Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Physically Consistent Outflow Boundary Conditions for Global Stability Analysis of Bluff Body Wakes

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Classical zero-value or zero-derivative outlets cannot converge for globally stable but spatially amplifying bluff-body wakes; a Robin outlet from local linear stability theory closes the problem in small domains.

desk verdict Solid methodology paper: the Robin outlet genuinely improves global-mode convergence in truncated domains, especially low-Re stable wakes; but the BC's expansion point is under-specified and one table has a Re typo, so it needs revision, not rejection. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17864 v1 pith:T55PGT4M submitted 2026-07-20 physics.flu-dyn math-phmath.MP

Guangyao Cui , Amit Sigawi , Michael Karp This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynmath-phmath.MP
keywords globallinearstabilityanalysisoutflowboundaryconditionRobinbluffbodywakelocaltheorymatrix-formingeigenvaluemethodspatialamplificationeigenmodeconvergence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Global stability analysis of bluff-body wakes asks how an infinitesimal disturbance grows in space and time, and the answer can depend on where you cut off the computational box. The paper argues that the standard way to close the box—Neumann or Dirichlet conditions at the outlet—is fundamentally mismatched for the hardest case: low Reynolds numbers below the instability threshold, where the global eigenmode keeps growing downstream forever even after the wake has died out. In that regime, making the box longer does not help, because the mismatch is in the boundary condition, not the domain. The paper's proposed fix is a Robin condition that feeds local linear-stability information about the wake profile at the outlet into the eigenvalue solver; it demonstrates that this condition yields converged eigenvalues and clean pressure eigenmodes in substantially smaller domains, for both cylinder and airfoil wakes. If true, this makes global stability calculations cheaper and more reliable in precisely the regime where older boundary conditions mislead.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Robin outflow boundary condition built from a first-order Taylor expansion of the local dispersion relation ω(α) ≈ ω0 + c0(α − α0) about a neutral point, where c0 is the complex group velocity of the leading local linear-stability mode at the outlet profile. Discretizing the Fourier relation iα q̂ = ∂q̂/∂x turns this dispersion relation into a linear relation between the eigenfunction and its streamwise derivative at the outlet, which is inserted directly into the matrix-forming global eigenvalue problem. The group velocity is evaluated by a biorthogonality formula involving the direct and adjoint local eigenmodes, so no externally prescribed convection speed is nee

What would settle it

Compute the leading global mode for the Re = 40 cylinder wake in a box with outlet at x_o = 200 (or use a high-order spectral reference domain) and measure whether the Robin-C prediction matches the true spatial envelope all the way to the outlet; if the local linear-stability group velocity fails to reproduce the measured downstream growth rate, the Taylor assumption is the point that breaks. Equivalently, solve the full spatial Orr-Sommerfeld dispersion relation at x_o = 100 and compare its complex wavenumber with the Taylor estimate; a mismatch comparable to the reported eigenvalue variatio

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A wake eigenmode below the critical Reynolds number has negative temporal growth but positive spatial growth far downstream, because the two are linked by the downstream advection speed: near a uniform far-wake profile the dispersion relation gives ω_i ≈ U_c α_i, so a damped global mode must amplify in x. Classical outlet conditions assume the opposite—zero normal derivative, zero value, or zero stress at the outlet—so they either force the mode to stop growing and generate oscillations, or leave it unconstrained and become numerically sensitive. The paper's Robin outlet condition instead imposes a first-order relation between the eigenfunction and its streamwise derivative at the outlet, us

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the first-order Taylor expansion of the local dispersion relation around a neutral point, with a constant group velocity, describes the far-wake global mode; the paper does not specify how (ω0, α0) is defined for a damped wake profile, so if the dispersion relation is not captured by this local form, the Robin outlet imposes an artificial structure instead of removing one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, classical Neumann and Dirichlet outlets should not be trusted at Reynolds numbers below the global-instability threshold; the paper's dispersion-relation argument says no domain length cures them.
  • The Robin outlet permits stable-wake global modes to be computed in small boxes (outlet at x_o = 10–20 rather than 50–100+), cutting the memory and time cost of matrix-forming eigenvalue problems.
  • Pressure eigenmode quality becomes a usable diagnostic: Robin produces pressure fields with no striped outlet pollution, a component that most previous global-stability studies did not examine.
  • The method transfers from cylinder wakes to airfoil wakes and from two-dimensional modes to spanwise-wavenumber (stationary and traveling) modes, so it likely applies across the family of incompressible bluff-body wakes.
  • Because the condition is cast in the matrix-forming finite-difference eigenvalue framework, the same Robin closure can be dropped into Floquet and compressible extensions, as the paper suggests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable corollary the paper leaves implicit: the spatial-amplification argument applies to any localized base flow with a nearly uniform far field, so the low-Reynolds-number failure of Neumann and Dirichlet outlets should be generic for wakes, jets, and mixing layers, not just cylinders and airfoils.
  • One could use Robin-C as a built-in consistency check: compare the envelope slope of the global eigenfunction with the local linear-stability prediction at every outlet; if they diverge for large x_o, the first-order Taylor description is failing and no boundary condition of this form can claim physical consistency.
  • A direct extension is to carry the Taylor expansion of the dispersion relation to second order in α, which would capture curvature of ω(α) and might reduce the residual outlet-position dependence seen at small x_o.
  • The appendix's sensitivity of sponge layers to tuning parameters suggests that the Robin outlet may also be preferable in nonlinear and time-stepping simulations of stable wakes, since it replaces an artificial damping coefficient with a locally computed group velocity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a matrix-forming, finite-difference global linear stability solver for incompressible bluff-body wakes and uses it to compare outflow boundary conditions (Dirichlet, Neumann, extrapolation, stress-free, sponge, and a Robin condition derived from local linear stability theory). The central claim is that the Robin condition yields eigenvalues and eigenfunctions that converge with respect to outlet location on significantly shorter domains, and that this is essential in the low-Reynolds-number globally stable regime where the global eigenmode amplifies spatially without bound. Two Robin variants are considered: Robin-R, which neglects the imaginary part of the group velocity, and Robin-C, which retains it. The solver is validated against published growth rates and frequencies for cylinder and NACA0015 airfoil wakes, and the Robin condition is shown to drastically reduce the required domain size, especially for the airfoil case at Re=200/220.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper makes a practically important contribution: it identifies a regime (low-Re stable wakes) where classical outlet conditions cannot be rescued by extending the domain, and it provides an OBC that is both physically motivated and compatible with matrix-forming eigenvalue solvers. The quantitative comparisons with independent literature values (Barkley 2006, Mittal 2010, He et al. 2017) are a genuine strength, as is the systematic comparison of the real and complex Robin variants. The paper also usefully documents that pressure eigenfunctions are far more sensitive to the outlet condition than velocity eigenfunctions. However, several load-bearing details of the Robin condition are underspecified, and one of the quantitative comparisons contains an inconsistency; these issues need to be resolved before the conclusions can be fully accepted.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.3.2, Eqs. (8)–(14)] The Robin condition is constructed from a Taylor expansion about a 'neutral point' (ω0, α0), but the manuscript never states how (ω0, α0) is selected for a damped wake profile. For Re<Re_cr there is no obvious neutral mode, so the expansion center is not self-evident. Eq. (14) requires α0 through the inner products, and Fig. 4 reconstructs α from the global eigenvalue using the same expansion. If α0 is inferred from the global spectrum, the BC inherits the answer it is meant to produce; if it is chosen ad hoc, the convergence comparisons in Figs. 2 and 9 may reflect a favorable tuning parameter. The authors must state the procedure for determining (ω0, α0) for each outlet and Reynolds number and provide a sensitivity study over that choice.
  2. [§3.2.1, Eqs. (9)–(11), Fig. 4] The validation of the local spatial growth rate is partly circular. In Fig. 4, α_r and α_i are recovered from the global eigenvalue using the same Taylor expansion, Eqs. (9) and (11), that defines the Robin BC. Figure 5 then compares the global mode's spatial slope with the α_i obtained in this way. To be an independent check, the authors should compare the global mode's spatial growth with roots of the local Orr–Sommerfeld dispersion relation computed at each outlet without invoking Eqs. (8)–(11) as both construction and diagnosis. Without this, the agreement in Fig. 5 does not establish that the local LST description is the correct one at the outlet.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (16)] The pressure-error metric ε_p is anchored to the Robin-C condition itself: p_ref is defined as the pressure mode obtained with Robin-C, so ε_p=0 for Robin-C by construction. This does not measure absolute accuracy; it measures agreement with the advocated method. The qualitative conclusion that Robin-C produces smoother pressure fields is supported by the contour plots, but the quantitative claim '0.06' and '0.17' etc. should be replaced or supplemented by an error relative to an independent reference, e.g., a solution on a much larger domain or with a different discretization.
  4. [Table 2 / §3.4] There is a Reynolds-number inconsistency: the text and Fig. 11 state the NACA0015 case is Re=200, while Table 2 is captioned Re=220 and compares with Table 7 of He et al. The convergence comparison in Table 2 is a central quantitative claim ('three orders of magnitude smaller'), but it is not clear whether the present computation was done at Re=200 or Re=220. The authors must correct the inconsistency and ensure that the comparison with the literature is made at the same Reynolds number.
  5. [§2.3.2, Eq. (12)] The claim that global eigenfunctions amplify indefinitely as x→∞ relies on the approximation ω=αU_c−i k^2/Re≈αU_c, i.e., neglect of the viscous term. For Re=40, the lowest Reynolds number considered, this approximation is not obviously valid unless |α|^2 ≪ Re|ω|. Since this approximation underpins the conclusion that 'further extension of the domain will not facilitate convergence' for low-Re stable wakes, the authors should quantify the neglected term for the parameters used, or provide a more careful asymptotic argument that the growing root of the full quadratic has positive spatial growth even when the viscous term is retained.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4] Typo: 'less affective' should be 'less effective' in the Conclusions.
  2. [Fig. 4] Please label the axes explicitly and state what α_r and α_i represent (units are presumably D^-1; the current caption is terse).
  3. [Table 2] The dashes for missing entries are not explained in the caption; state that the corresponding data are not available from the cited reference or were not computed.
  4. [Eq. (15)] The notation ⟨q†,N q⟩ is confusing because N is both the operator and the inner-product bracket; please use a clearer notation, e.g., ⟨q†, N q⟩ with explicit definitions of the operators.
  5. [Appendix C] The discussion of the sponge layer shows strong sensitivity to σ0, which is good, but please also state whether the sponge is applied to both velocity and pressure, and whether the damping profile is applied in the same way as in Mani (2012).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Two supporting comparisons are built from the Robin-C construction, but the central convergence claim is externally benchmarked.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, Eq. (16) and Fig. 3 caption]
    "where ∥·∥2 denotes the L2 norm, p̂o represents the pressure mode at the outlet for different OBCs, and p̂_ref_o denotes the pressure mode corresponding to the Robin-C condition, which is defined as a reference."

    The pressure-quality metric is defined with the Robin-C mode as the reference, so ε_p for Robin-C is zero by construction, as reported in Fig. 3 ('0 (o)'). Using this metric to claim that the Robin-C pressure field is 'less distorted' or higher quality is self-referential: it only measures how far other BCs are from Robin-C, not how accurate Robin-C is against an independent truth.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.2.1, Figure 5; eqs. (8), (9b), (13)]
    "The local streamwise wavenumber can be obtained from eqs. (9) and (11), for the Robin-C and Robin-R OBCs, respectively. ... The red lines mark the maximum magnitude of the mode û within 30≤x≤100 in figure 3(m), with x_o=100, and its slope represents the local spatial growth of the global mode. The slopes of the short lines are identical to −α_i, evaluated at the corresponding x_o locations of the local analysis, which should ideally match the slope of the red line."

    The Robin-C outlet condition, Eq. (13), is the Fourier relation q_x = iα q combined with the Taylor dispersion relation Eq. (8). Thus the global mode computed with Robin-C has its outlet slope constrained by that same local-LST relation. In Fig. 5, α_i is recovered from the resulting global ω via Eq. (9b), so the match between the envelope slope and −α_i is a consistency check of the solver, not an independent validation of the local-LST prediction.

full rationale

The central claim—that Robin outlet conditions give converged global modes on truncated domains—is not circular. The eigenvalue convergence data in Figs. 2, 6, 8, 9 and 11, and Table 2 are benchmarked against independent literature values (Barkley, Mittal, He et al.) and against large-domain references, so the main result is not fitted to the conclusion. I found no load-bearing self-citation: the cited local-LST tools (Gaster, Ehrenstein & Gallaire, Alizard & Robinet) are external prior work, and the paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem by the authors. However, two supporting comparisons are partly built from the Robin-C construction: the ε_p metric takes Robin-C as its reference, and the Fig. 5 'agreement' uses a global mode produced with the same Robin-C dispersion relation. These are partial circularities in auxiliary validations, not in the central convergence result. I also note that the paper never states how the neutral point (ω0, α0) required by Eq. (8) is selected for a damped wake outlet; that is a reproducibility gap, but the text does not show that these parameters are inferred from the target eigenvalue, so I do not count it as demonstrated circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the local LST expansion and its neutral-point selection, which is the least documented part of the method. No new physical entities are introduced; the free parameters are method parameters rather than fitted physical constants. The base-flow symmetry assumption for Re>Re_cr is standard in this literature but still an assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • Robin expansion point (ω0, α0) = not reported
    The Taylor expansion in eq. (8) requires a neutral-point frequency and wavenumber for each outlet; the paper does not describe how these are computed or chosen for the damped far-wake profile. This choice enters the boundary-condition operator.
  • Sponge damping coefficient σ0 = 0.05–1.5 (swept)
    Appendix C shows the sponge result depends strongly on σ0; because the paper ultimately rejects sponge layers, this parameter is not central to the main claim.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Flow is governed by the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and perturbations by the linearized NSE (eq. 2).
    This is the standard governing model for the wake flows considered.
  • domain assumption The local LST ansatz qhat(y) exp(i(αx+βz−ωt)) is valid at every outlet position.
    The Robin boundary condition is derived from this ansatz and from local dispersion relations; its validity at a truncated wake outlet is assumed without direct verification.
  • ad hoc to paper A Taylor expansion ω−ω0 = c0(α−α0) around a real neutral point applies to the outlet profile, with c0i negligible in Robin-R and complex in Robin-C.
    Eqs. (8)-(13) import the boundary-layer neutral-point expansion into wake flows; the paper does not prove that a neutral point exists for the damped near-uniform far-wake profile.
  • ad hoc to paper For x→∞ the base flow is uniform and ω = αU_c − i k^2/Re ≈ αU_c, so the viscous contribution is neglected when concluding indefinite spatial amplification.
    Eq. (12) drops the k^2/Re term to argue that −α_i > 0 ad infinitum; for Re=40 this approximation may be questionable and is not quantified.
  • domain assumption For Re≥47, a symmetric steady base flow is obtained by solving only the upper half-domain and mirroring; this artificial base flow is the relevant state for stability analysis.
    Used in §3.3 to suppress vortex shedding and obtain a steady base flow above the critical Reynolds number; the physical relevance of this base flow for global instability is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physically Consistent Outflow Boundary Conditions for Global Stability Analysis of Bluff Body Wakes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T55PGT4M

@misc{pith2026260717864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physically Consistent Outflow Boundary Conditions for Global Stability Analysis of Bluff Body Wakes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T55PGT4M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17864}
}
abstract

Global linear stability analysis of bluff body wake flows is performed using the matrix-forming method based on finite-difference discretization. Particular emphasis is placed on the influence of outflow boundary conditions, with the aim of minimizing the required computational domain size without degrading accuracy or inducing spurious oscillations near the outlet. This study focuses on incompressible wakes behind bluff bodies such as cylinders and airfoils at high angle of attack, especially in regimes where global modes exhibit downstream spatial amplification. It is shown that below the critical Reynolds number -- where the global mode remains linearly stable -- significant spatial growth can persist far downstream, even when the wake is nearly absent. This behavior underscores the importance of imposing a physical boundary condition at the outlet. Several commonly used outflow boundary conditions are evaluated, including Dirichlet, Neumann, extrapolation, stress-free, sponge layer, and the Robin condition that incorporates predictions from local linear stability analysis at the outlet. The results demonstrate that, for different $Re$ cases, the Robin condition enables robust convergence of global modes within substantially truncated domains, thereby improving the efficiency of global stability analysis. These findings highlight the broader applicability of the matrix-forming approach for complex stability analyses, including Floquet analysis of time-periodic flows and extensions to compressible configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17864 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the computational domain for a flow past a circular cylinder of diameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Real (a) and imaginary (c) parts of the least stable eigenvalue from the global stability analysis for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Real part of the least stable global eigenmode of the flow past a circular cylinder at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of 𝛼 estimated in eq. (9) and eq. (11), for Robin-R condition (gray) and Robin-C condition (black). The eigenvalue 𝜔 was obtained from global analysis. The significant improvement associated with the Robin BC is observed in the eigenmod…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of local spatial growth rates of the streamwise velocity component of the global mode, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same caption as figure 2 for 𝑅𝑒 = 70 in the current plots. Different boundary conditions are denoted by different colors: Dirichlet (magenta), Neumann (black), and Robin-C (red). the flow becomes globally unstable at the higher Reynolds number, consistent with the resu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real part of the most unstable global eigenmode of the flow past a circular cylinder at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Growth rate, 𝜔𝑖 , and (b) Strouhal number, 𝑆𝑡 = 𝜔𝑟 /2𝜋, variation with Reynolds number in the cylinder wake flow. Red: Barkley [3]; blue: Mittal [16]; black: present study [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the least stable eigenvalue of global stability analysis for NACA0015 airfoil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Real part of the least stable eigenmode, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Growth rate, 𝜔𝑖 , and (b) Strouhal number, 𝑆𝑡, of the least stable modes of NACA0015 airfoil at 𝑅𝑒=200 and angle of attack of 18◦ . Blue: He et al. [14] with time stepping method (Nektar++) and domain (𝑥o, 𝑦max ) = (50, 15); red: He et al. [14] with matrix-forming…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references

  1. [1]

    T.vonKármán, Überdenmechanismusdeswiderstandes, deneinbewegterkörperineiner flüssigkeit erfährt, Nachr. Von Ges. Wiss. Göttingen Math.-Phys. Kl. 11 (1911) 509–517

    1911

  2. [2]

    Barkley, R

    D. Barkley, R. D. Henderson, Three-dimensional Floquet stability analysis of the wake of a circular cylinder, J. Fluid Mech. 322 (1996) 215–241

    1996

  3. [3]

    D.Barkley, Linearanalysisofthecylinderwakemeanflow, Europhys.Lett.75(2006)750

    2006

  4. [4]

    C. H. Williamson, Oblique and parallel modes of vortex shedding in the wake of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 206 (1989) 579–627

    1989

  5. [5]

    R. L. Sani, P. M. Gresho, Résumé and remarks on the open boundary condition minisym- posium, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 18 (1994) 983–1008

    1994

  6. [6]

    Liu, Open and traction boundary conditions for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equa- tions, J

    J. Liu, Open and traction boundary conditions for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equa- tions, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 7250–7267

    2009

  7. [7]

    Guermond, P

    J.-L. Guermond, P. Minev, J. Shen, Error analysis of pressure-correction schemes for the time-dependent Stokes equations with open boundary conditions, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2005) 239–258

    2005

  8. [8]

    21 (1976) 251–269

    I.Orlanski, Asimpleboundaryconditionforunboundedhyperbolicflows, J.Comput.Phys. 21 (1976) 251–269

    1976

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Ruith, P

    M. Ruith, P. Chen, E. Meiburg, Development of boundary conditions for direct numerical simulations of three-dimensional vortex breakdown phenomena in semi-infinite domains, Comput. Fluids 33 (2004) 1225–1250

    2004

  2. [10]

    G. Jin, M. Braza, A nonreflecting outlet boundary condition for incompressible unsteady navier-stokes calculations, J. Comput. Phys. 107 (1993) 239–253

    1993

  3. [11]

    T. C. Papanastasiou, N. Malamataris, K. Ellwood, A new outflow boundary condition, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 14 (1992) 587–608

    1992

  4. [12]

    S. Dong, G. E. Karniadakis, C. Chryssostomidis, A robust and accurate outflow boundary condition for incompressible flow simulations on severely-truncated unbounded domains, J. Comput. Phys. 261 (2014) 83–105

    2014

  5. [13]

    Giannetti, P

    F. Giannetti, P. Luchini, Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 581 (2007) 167–197

    2007

  6. [14]

    W. He, R. Gioria, J. M. Pérez, V. Theofilis, Linear instability of low Reynolds number massively separated flow around three NACA airfoils, J. Fluid Mech. 811 (2017) 701–741

    2017

  7. [15]

    B. R. Noack, K. Afanasiev, M. Morzyński, G. Tadmor, F. Thiele, A hierarchy of low- dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake, J. Fluid Mech. 497 (2003) 335–363

    2003

  8. [16]

    Mittal, Stability of flow past a cylinder: Energy budget of eigenmodes, Int

    S. Mittal, Stability of flow past a cylinder: Energy budget of eigenmodes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 63 (2010) 533–547. 26

    2010

  9. [17]

    S. Sen, S. Mittal, G. Biswas, Flow past a square cylinder at low Reynolds numbers, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 67 (2011) 1160–1174

    2011

  10. [18]

    D. Sipp, A. Lebedev, Global stability of base and mean flows: a general approach and its applications to cylinder and open cavity flows, J. Fluid Mech. 593 (2007) 333–358

    2007

  11. [19]

    Fluid Mech

    D.Canuto,K.Taira, Two-dimensionalcompressibleviscousflowaroundacircularcylinder, J. Fluid Mech. 785 (2015) 349–371

    2015

  12. [20]

    Ehrenstein, F

    U. Ehrenstein, F. Gallaire, On two-dimensional temporal modes in spatially evolving open flows: the flat-plate boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 536 (2005) 209–218

    2005

  13. [21]

    Alizard, J

    F. Alizard, J. Robinet, Spatially convective global modes in a boundary layer, Phys. Fluids 19 (2007) 114105

    2007

  14. [22]

    Fasel, U

    H. Fasel, U. Rist, U. Konzelmann, Numerical investigation of the three-dimensional devel- opment in boundary-layer transition, AIAA J. 28 (1990) 29–37

    1990

  15. [23]

    M.P.Juniper,A.Hanifi,V.Theofilis, Modalstabilitytheory: lecturenotesfromtheFLOW- NORDITA summer school on advanced instability methods for complex flows, Stockholm, Sweden, 2013, Appl. Mech. Rev. 66 (2014) 024804

    2013

  16. [24]

    P. J. Schmid, D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows, Springer, New York, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    Theofilis, Global linear instability, Annu

    V. Theofilis, Global linear instability, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 (2011) 319–352

    2011

  18. [26]

    R. B. Lehoucq, D. C. Sorensen, C. Yang, ARPACK users’ guide: solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods, SIAM, 1998

    1998

  19. [27]

    T. D. Economon, F. Palacios, S. R. Copeland, T. W. Lukaczyk, J. J. Alonso, SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design, AIAA J. 54 (2016) 828–846

    2016

  20. [28]

    Theofilis, The linearized pressure Poisson equation for global instability analysis of incompressible flows, Theor

    V. Theofilis, The linearized pressure Poisson equation for global instability analysis of incompressible flows, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 31 (2017) 623–642

    2017

  21. [29]

    Theofilis, Advances in global linear instability analysis of nonparallel and three- dimensional flows, Prog

    V. Theofilis, Advances in global linear instability analysis of nonparallel and three- dimensional flows, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39 (2003) 249–315

    2003

  22. [30]

    A.Mani, Analysisandoptimizationofnumericalspongelayersasanonreflectiveboundary treatment, J. Comput. Phys. 231 (2012) 704–716

    2012

  23. [31]

    Fluids 18 (2006)

    F.Chedevergne,G.Casalis,T.Feraille, Bigloballinearstabilityanalysisoftheflowinduced by wall injection, Phys. Fluids 18 (2006)

    2006

  24. [32]

    Gaster, A note on the relation between temporally-increasing and spatially-increasing disturbances in hydrodynamic stability, J

    M. Gaster, A note on the relation between temporally-increasing and spatially-increasing disturbances in hydrodynamic stability, J. Fluid Mech. 14 (1962) 222–224

    1962

  25. [33]

    A. H. Nayfeh, A. Padhye, Relation between temporal and spatial stability in three- dimensional flows, AIAA J. 17 (1979) 1084–1090. 27

    1979

  26. [34]

    A. Tumin, The biorthogonal eigenfunction system of linear stability equations: A survey of applications to receptivity problems and to analysis of experimental and computational results, in: 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 2011, p. 3244

    2011

  27. [35]

    A. G. Tomboulides, Direct and large eddy simulation of wake flows: Flow past a sphere, Princeton University, 1993

    1993

  28. [36]

    J. D. Anderson, Computational fluid dynamics: the basics with applications, McGraw-Hill New York, 2002. 28

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.