Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 77 references

First-principles electronic transport properties of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V for modeling ultrashort-pulse laser ablation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In simulations of ultrashort-pulse ablation of Ti-6Al-4V, the functional form of the electronic thermal conductivity shifts peak lattice temperature by up to 19% — more than the elemental-Ti versus alloy-specific distinction.

desk verdict Useful alloy-specific transport parameter set for Ti-6Al-4V with a credible G-κe compensation story, but the headline 19% claim sits on an unspecified high-temperature extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18085 v1 pith:7JYKRX7O submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Korbinian Hobmaier , Guillaume E. Allemand , Alberto Marmodoro , Matthieu J. Verstraete , Ján Minár , Heinz P. Huber , David Redka This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Ti-6Al-4Vultrashort-pulselaserablationtwo-temperaturemodelelectronicthermalconductivityelectron-phononcouplingKubo-GreenwoodcoherentpotentialapproximationMott-Ioffe-Regellimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the dominant source of error in two-temperature-model predictions of ultrashort-pulse laser ablation of Ti-6Al-4V is not the common practice of substituting elemental-titanium parameters, but the functional form chosen for the electronic thermal conductivity. It computes temperature-dependent electronic transport for both hcp Ti and the alloy from first principles, treating chemical and thermal disorder on equal footing. The central numerical discovery is that alloy-specific parameters and elemental-titanium parameters give nearly the same peak lattice temperatures (within about 1.4%), because reduced electron-phonon coupling offsets a 6.4-fold reduction in thermal conductivity. Replacing the first-principles conductivity with the widespread low-temperature Drude form shifts the peak lattice temperature by up to 19%, making the transport-model choice more consequential than the material-property choice. A sympathetic reader would care because most existing simulations use that Drude form, meaning their predictions carry a systematic error larger than the material-property uncertainty they are trying to correct.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electronic thermal conductivity map κe(Te, Tl), computed via Kubo-Greenwood linear response within a Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Green's function scheme that combines the coherent potential approximation for chemical disorder with an alloy-analogy model for thermal disorder. From the energy-resolved conductivity σ(E), generalized Onsager transport coefficients yield κe(Te, Tl) including the Seebeck correction. These maps feed a two-temperature model whose logarithmic sensitivity analysis isolates the influence of each parameter; the key mechanism is that the electron-phonon coupling G and the conductivity prefactor κe0 have opposite-sign sensitivities that cancel in the

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurement of the transient lattice temperature of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V after a 300-fs excitation pulse (for example, ultrafast electron or X-ray diffraction), compared side by side with two-temperature-model predictions using the first-principles κe map versus the Drude form; if the Drude form matches the measured temperature better, the central 19% claim would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper shows that for the workhorse titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, the accuracy of two-temperature-model simulations of ultrashort-pulse ablation is governed more by the functional form of the electronic thermal conductivity than by whether the parameters are taken from elemental Ti or from the alloy itself. First-principles Kubo-Greenwood calculations yield thermal conductivity maps that saturate and then decrease with electronic temperature, peaking near 2.97 kW m−1 K−1 for Ti but only 0.47 kW m−1 K−1 for Ti-6Al-4V. Despite that factor-of-6.4 difference, the alloy's lower electron-phonon coupling compensates, so peak lattice temperatures from the two parameter sets differ by only about 1.4%.

Load-bearing premise

The transport map is trusted at lattice temperatures above about 1.3 times the melting point, where the hcp crystal formalism formally breaks down; the paper linearly extrapolates the conductivity input to 2500 K and then uses it up to the phase-explosion regime near 8000–9600 K.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A complete first-principles parameter set for hcp Ti-6Al-4V—electronic heat capacity, electron-phonon coupling, and κe(Te, Tl)—is now available for two-temperature-model simulations without substituting elemental-titanium values.
  • Using alloy-specific parameters instead of elemental Ti changes predicted peak lattice temperatures by only about 1.4% at 300 fs, consistent with experimental ablation thresholds that differ by about 3%.
  • Replacing first-principles κe with the low-temperature Drude form raises the peak lattice temperature by 7% at the melting threshold and 19% at phase explosion, so the functional form dominates predictive error.
  • The near-identical lattice response of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V stems from opposite-sign sensitivities of G and κe that cancel; this compensation is strongest for sub-picosecond pulses and weakens at longer durations, predicting about a 9% higher ablation threshold for Ti in the nanosecond limit.
  • The experimentally observed high-temperature resistivity saturation of Ti is reproduced by the calculation and traced to loss of quasiparticle coherence, with mean free paths approaching the Mott-Ioffe-Regel limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 19% shift is representative, past and existing two-temperature-model studies of Ti-6Al-4V that adopt the linear Te/Tl conductivity may carry a systematic overestimate of peak lattice temperature, although relative comparisons between materials could remain valid since both are affected similarly.
  • The same first-principles machinery could be applied to other commercial alloys; a useful test would be whether the G-κe compensation observed here is a general feature of strongly chemically disordered metals or specific to Ti-6Al-4V.
  • Because the paper uses peak lattice temperature as a proxy for ablation threshold rather than an explicit spallation or phase-explosion criterion, combining the new parameter set with a hydrodynamic or molecular-dynamics ablation model and comparing crater-depth data would directly test the proxy's validity.
  • A clean falsifying experiment: measure the ablation-threshold ratio of Ti to Ti-6Al-4V at nanosecond pulses; if it does not approach the predicted ~1.09, the breakdown of G-κe compensation at long pulse durations is wrong.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the electronic transport properties of hcp Ti and the Ti-6Al-4V alloy using the KKR-CPA method with the alloy-analogy model and the Kubo-Greenwood formalism, obtaining temperature-dependent electronic thermal conductivity, electron-phonon coupling, and electronic heat capacity. These parameters are then used in one-dimensional two-temperature-model (TTM) simulations of ultrashort-pulse laser excitation. The principal claims are: (i) the Ti resistivity agrees with ab initio electron-phonon calculations and experiment, including the high-temperature saturation; (ii) Ti-6Al-4V and elemental Ti produce almost identical peak lattice temperatures in TTM despite large differences in transport parameters; and (iii) replacing the first-principles thermal conductivity with the commonly used low-temperature Drude form κ_e = κ_e0 T_e/T_l shifts the peak lattice temperature by up to 19%, so the functional form of κ_e matters more than the elemental/alloy distinction.

Significance. If the central 19% claim is correct, the paper makes a practically important point for modeling ultrafast laser ablation of Ti-6Al-4V: the choice of the κ_e(T_e,T_l) functional form is more consequential than whether one uses elemental Ti or alloy-specific parameters. The paper has clear strengths: the Ti resistivity benchmark against independent ABINIT electron-phonon calculations and experiment (Fig. 1a) is convincing; the comparison between the full generalized transport-coefficient result and the Drude-type approximations (Fig. 3b) is transparent; and the pulse-duration-dependent sensitivity analysis (Fig. 4c,d) provides useful physical insight. However, the quantitative 19% headline is currently not fully supported because it is obtained in a regime of lattice temperature far above the range for which the first-principles κ_e map is defined or documented. The alloy κ_e is also not independently validated, which weakens the 1.4% cancellation claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II B, II C and Fig. 4(b)] The central 19% claim is anchored in the phase-explosion regime, where the TTM reaches T_l,max ≈ 8.1 kK for Ti and ≈ 9.6 kK for the low-T model. The first-principles κ_e map, however, is computed only up to T_l = 2500 K (Sec. II B: “computed for a discrete set of lattice temperatures up to T_l = 2100 K and then linearly extrapolated to T_l = 2500 K”), and Sec. II C explicitly disclaims strict validity above ≈ 1.3 T_m. The manuscript never states how κ_e(T_e,T_l) is continued from 2500 K to 8–9.6 kK during the TTM integration. Since the comparison model κ_e = κ_e0 T_e/T_l has a strong 1/T_l dependence, the discrepancy between the two models at high T_l is not fixed without specifying the continuation of both consistently. The 19% overshoot could change materially if the first-principles map is clamped at 2500 K, extrapolated with a different functional form, or replaced by a liquid-metal
  2. [Sec. III C and Fig. 3(d)] The conclusion that Ti and Ti-6Al-4V give nearly identical lattice temperatures (1.4% difference) relies on the alloy-specific κ_e, whose peak value is a factor of 6.4 lower than in Ti. Unlike the elemental Ti resistivity, the alloy κ_e is not benchmarked against any independent calculation or measurement. The equilibrium resistivity comparison in Fig. 2(d) is a useful check of the CPA disorder model, but κ_e is an energy-integrated Onsager quantity and its alloy suppression depends on the detailed σ(E) shape, not just the residual resistivity. I recommend at least one independent verification of the alloy transport map (e.g., a Wiedemann–Franz check at low T_e, or a second method) or an explicit estimate of the uncertainty in the alloy κ_e before the 1.4% cancellation is used quantitatively.
  3. [Sec. II C and TTM setup] The phase-explosion threshold is defined as T_l,max = 0.9 T_crit with T_crit = 8980 K for titanium, and the simulated peak lattice temperatures in Fig. 4(b) are 8.1–9.6 kK. For the low-T model, T_l,max = 9638 K exceeds T_crit, while no phase change or liquid-state transport is included in the TTM. The authors acknowledge that mechanical response and phase change are not considered, and use T_l,max only as a proxy, but for the specific claim about the phase-explosion regime it would be important to clarify what physical meaning is assigned to T_l,max above T_crit and whether the liquid-state κ_e and C_l should not be used there. The first-principles κ_e from the crystalline hcp calculation is formally not applicable in this regime, and the assertion that the electronic DOS changes weakly upon melting [57] does not directly ensure that σ(E) or κ_e behaves the same way.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. III D] The abstract says “low-temperature Drude limit”, while the TTM comparison in Sec. III D replaces the first-principles conductivity with the linear form κ_e = κ_e0 T_e/T_l, which is the low-temperature limit of Eq. (13), not the full Drude scattering model including electron-electron scattering. Please use consistent terminology.
  2. [Sec. II A] State explicitly that “f-character” means angular momentum l = 3, and consider giving the angular-momentum cutoff convergence test in the main text rather than only in the Supplemental Material.
  3. [Data availability] The statement “data available from the corresponding authors upon request” is suboptimal for a first-principles dataset that is meant to be reusable. A repository link (e.g., Zenodo or a materials database) would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Fig. 3(c,d)] The caption says the κ_e maps are “interpolated ... from GTC calculations at four lattice temperatures”, but the interpolation method is not specified. State whether linear or spline interpolation is used and how the maps behave outside the 300–2500 K T_l range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GTC thermal conductivity is derived from first-principles σ(E) without TTM feedback; the calibrated Drude model is only a comparison baseline, and the co-author self-citations are methodological and cross-checked.

full rationale

The paper's central transport quantity, κe(Te,Tl), is obtained from the generalized Onsager transport coefficients (Sec. II B, Eqs. 2–4) using the Kubo–Greenwood conductivity σ(E) computed within SPR-KKR–CPA–AAM. No TTM output is fed back into this calculation, so the functional-form comparison is not self-referential. The low-temperature Drude model (Eq. 13) has Bep fixed to reproduce the equilibrium conductivity — 'Bep = γe vF^2/(3κe0), with vF = ... is fixed by requiring Eq. (13) to recover the equilibrium conductivity at Te = Tl' — but this model is explicitly used as a comparison baseline, not as the first-principles prediction. The claimed 19% shift in peak lattice temperature is a genuine TTM outcome, not an input. The same holds for the 1.4% Ti/alloy difference. Co-author self-citations appear in the methodology (SPR-KKR [26], AAM [39], composition-weighted G following Ref. [17]), but they are not used to forbid alternatives, and key inputs are independently benchmarked: the Ti resistivity is compared with abinit electron–phonon calculations and experiment, and λ⟨ω²⟩ agrees with abinit to about 11%. The acknowledged limitation that σ(E) is computed only up to Tl = 2100 K, linearly extrapolated to 2500 K, and that the KKR/AAM treatment is formally valid only below about 1.3Tm, is a validity risk for the high-temperature phase-explosion results, not a circularity: the extrapolation is not chosen to reproduce the 19% number. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained; score 2 reflects only the presence of minor methodological self-citations that are not load-bearing for the central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculations are free-standing in that the GTC transport integrals use only σ(E) from the KKR-CPA calculation; no target transport coefficient is fitted. However, the paper depends on several external inputs: λ and Debye temperatures (partially checked against abinit for Ti), the AAM construction of thermal disorder, a frozen self-consistent potential, a Debye-spectrum approximation for α²F(ω), and a composition-weighted λ for the alloy. The TTM adds further modeling assumptions: peak-lattice-temperature proxy, no phase change, fixed optical constants. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • λ_Ti-6Al-4V (electron-phonon mass-enhancement parameter) = 0.388 (composition-weighted estimate)
    Used in Eq. (8) to compute G(Te). Constructed from composition-weighted elemental data following Ref. [17]; no independent alloy-specific calculation or measurement is provided.
  • B_ep (electron-phonon scattering coefficient in Drude model, Eq. 13) = B_ep = γ_e v_F²/(3κe0), fixed to recover equilibrium κe0 ≈ 14 W/m/K
    Calibrated to the Wiedemann–Franz room-temperature value; affects only the comparison Drude model, not the GTC-derived transport map.
  • Debye temperatures Θ_mech^D and Θ_th^D = 385 K and 415 K
    Taken from Chen/Sundman and Sandia references; enter the AAM thermal-displacement calculation and the G(Te) prefactor through the Debye-spectrum estimate of ⟨ω²⟩.
  • Effective melting threshold 1.4Tm in TTM = 1.4 × Tm
    Defined in Section III D because the Gaussian-smoothed latent heat centered at 1.3Tm requires exceeding the nominal criterion to fully absorb the heat of fusion; a model choice.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Kubo–Greenwood Fermi-surface term (Eq. 2) is sufficient; the full Kubo–Bastin term is neglected.
    Invoked in Section II B; standard for metallic transport but excludes Fermi-sea contributions.
  • domain assumption Alloy-analogy model with 18 isotropic displacement directions and isotropic mean-square displacement maps thermal disorder onto substitutional disorder.
    Section II A; test calculations are reported to show <5% anisotropy in MSD, with details in the supplemental material.
  • domain assumption The self-consistent potential of the undistorted, 0 K structure is used at all Te and Tl; thermal expansion and displaced potentials are not self-consistently recomputed.
    Section II A; initial tests are said to show only marginal changes in resistivity, details in the supplemental material.
  • domain assumption α²F(ω) is approximated by a Debye spectrum with frequency-independent matrix elements, giving ⟨ω²⟩ = 0.5(kBΘ_th^D/ℏ)².
    Section II C, following Lin et al.; the product λ⟨ω²⟩ is checked against abinit only for elemental Ti, not for the alloy.
  • ad hoc to paper Composition-weighted λ for Ti-6Al-4V (0.388) approximates alloy electron-phonon coupling.
    Section II C; no independent alloy-specific λ calculation is provided.
  • domain assumption KKR/AAM treatment remains a first-order approximation for Tl above ≈1.3Tm, up to 2500 K (and implicitly in TTM up to several kK).
    End of Section II C; the authors explicitly flag the strict-domain violation and retain the data as a first-order approximation.
  • domain assumption Peak lattice temperature serves as a proxy for the ablation threshold.
    Section III D; explicitly acknowledged as a proxy, with quantitative comparison to measured thresholds requiring an explicit ablation criterion.
  • domain assumption TTM neglects mechanical/hydrodynamic response and phase change; optical constants are fixed at 300 K values.
    Section II C; stated as limitations of the TTM model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-principles electronic transport properties of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V for modeling ultrashort-pulse laser ablation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7JYKRX7O

@misc{pith2026260718085,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-principles electronic transport properties of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V for modeling ultrashort-pulse laser ablation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7JYKRX7O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18085}
}
read the original abstract

Predictive modeling of ultrashort-pulse laser ablation requires temperature-dependent material parameters derived from the electronic structure, namely the electronic thermal conductivity, electron--phonon coupling, and heat capacity. These parameters are well documented for elemental metals but remain sparsely documented for alloys, apart from application-relevant exceptions such as stainless steels. The technologically important titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V is a prominent example, which is still modeled using elemental-titanium values. We compute the electronic transport of hcp Ti and Ti-6Al-4V from first principles, using the Kubo--Greenwood formalism within the Korringa--Kohn--Rostoker coherent-potential-approximation framework, treating chemical and thermal disorder on equal footing. For elemental Ti, the calculated electrical resistivity agrees with independent \textsc{abinit} electron--phonon calculations and experiment, and also reproduces the high-temperature saturation near the Mott--Ioffe--Regel limit. Under electron--phonon nonequilibrium, the electronic thermal conductivity saturates and then decreases with electronic temperature, reaching a maximum of about \SI{2.97}{\kilo\watt\per\metre\per\kelvin} in Ti but only \SI{0.47}{\kilo\watt\per\metre\per\kelvin} in Ti-6Al-4V, a factor of 6.4 lower. In two-temperature-model simulations the alloy and elemental parameter sets yield peak lattice temperatures differing by only about 1.4\%, consistent with reported experimental ablation thresholds that differ by about 3\%, well within their measurement uncertainties. Replacing the first-principles thermal conductivity with the low-temperature Drude limit shifts the peak lattice temperature by up to 19\%, showing that the functional form of the transport model is even more important than the elemental vs alloy distinction for predictive accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18085 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electronic transport and Fermi surface of hcp Ti from first-principles calculations. (a) Temperature-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of electronic structure and transport between hcp Ti and hcp Ti-6Al-4V. (a, b) BSF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electronic properties of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V under electron–phonon nonequilibrium. (a) Orbital-resolved density of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-temperature dynamics and parameter sensitivity. (a, b) Calculated electron and lattice temperatures, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [57]

    W. Jank, C. Hausleitner, and J. Hafner, Electronic struc- ture of the liquid 3d and 4d transition metals, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter3, 4477 (1991)

    1991

  2. [1]

    Marin and A

    E. Marin and A. Lanzutti, Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review, Materials 17, 114 (2023)

    2023

  3. [2]

    Abd-Elaziem, M

    W. Abd-Elaziem, M. A. Darwish, A. Hamada, and W. M. Daoush, Titanium-Based alloys and composites for or- thopedic implants Applications: A comprehensive re- view, Materials & Design241, 112850 (2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    Z. Liu, B. He, T. Lyu, and Y. Zou, A Review on Ad- ditive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys for Aerospace Applications: Directed Energy Deposition and Beyond Ti-6Al-4V, JOM73, 1804 (2021)

    2021

  5. [4]

    Yin and O

    L. Yin and O. Umezawa, Crystal plasticity analysis of temperature-sensitive dwell fatigue in Ti-6Al-4V tita- nium alloy for an aero-engine fan disc, International Jour- nal of Fatigue156, 106688 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    Srivastava, V

    M. Srivastava, V. Jayakumar, Y. Udayan, S. M, M. S M, P. Gautam, and A. Nag, Additive manufacturing of Ti- tanium alloy for aerospace applications: Insights into the process, microstructure, and mechanical properties, Ap- plied Materials Today41, 102481 (2024)

    2024

  7. [6]

    Ezugwu, J

    E. Ezugwu, J. Bonney, and Y. Yamane, An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys, Journal of Mate- rials Processing Technology134, 233 (2003)

    2003

  8. [7]

    S. Ozan, S. Kasman, I. C. Ucar, and C. Wen, Laser sur- face texturing for enhanced implant biocompatibility and osseointegration: A critical review of its effects on surface properties, Clinical Biomechanics126, 106540 (2025)

    2025

Show all 77 references
  1. [8]

    Cunha, O

    A. Cunha, O. F. Zouani, L. Plawinski, A. M. Botelho Do Rego, A. Almeida, R. Vilar, and M.-C. Durrieu, Hu- man Mesenchymal Stem Cell Behavior on Femtosecond Laser-Textured Ti-6Al-4V Surfaces, Nanomedicine10, 725 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Y. Liu, Z. Rui, W. Cheng, L. Song, Y. Xu, R. Li, and X. Zhang, Characterization and evaluation of a femtosecond laser-induced osseointegration and an anti- inflammatory structure generated on a titanium alloy, Regenerative Biomaterials8, rbab006 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    Gnilitskyi, L

    I. Gnilitskyi, L. Dolgov, A. Tamm, A. M. Fer- raria, K. Diedkova, S. Kopanchuk, Y. Tsekhmister, S. Veiksina, V. Polewczyk, and M. Pogorielov, En- hanced osteointegration and osteogenesis of osteoblast cells by laser-induced surface modification of Ti implants, Nanomedicine: Na...

    2024

  4. [11]

    Garc ´ ıa-Hern´ andez, C

    C. Garc ´ ıa-Hern´ andez, C. Garc ´ ıa-Cabez´ on, F. Gonz´ alez- Diez, M. Ampudia, D. Juanes-Gusano, J. C. Rodriguez- Cabello, and F. Mart ´ ın-Pedrosa, Effect of processing on microstructure, mechanical properties, corrosion and bio- compatibility of additive manufacturing Ti...

    2025

  5. [12]

    S. I. Anisimov, B. L. Kapeliovich, and T. L. Perel- man, Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses, Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki66, 776 (1974), aDS Bibcode: 1974ZhETF..66..776A

    1974

  6. [13]

    Rethfeld, D

    B. Rethfeld, D. S. Ivanov, M. E. Garcia, and S. I. Anisimov, Modelling ultrafast laser ablation, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 193001 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    P. B. Allen, Theory of thermal relaxation of electrons in metals, Physical Review Letters59, 1460 (1987)

    1987

  8. [15]

    Z. Lin, L. V. Zhigilei, and V. Celli, Electron-phonon cou- pling and electron heat capacity of metals under condi- tions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium, Physical Review B77, 075133 (2008)

    2008

  9. [16]

    Y. V. Petrov, N. A. Inogamov, S. I. Anisimov, K. P. Migdal, V. A. Khokhlov, and K. V. Khishchenko, Ther- mal conductivity of condensed gold in states with the strongly excited electron subsystem, Journal of Physics: Conference Series653, 012087 (2015)

    2015

  10. [17]

    Winter, J

    J. Winter, J. Sotrop, S. Borek, H. P. Huber, and J. Min´ ar, Temperature dependent determination of electron heat capacity and electron-phonon factor for Fe0.72Cr0.18Ni0.1, Physical Review B93, 165119 (2016), arXiv:1506.05760 [cond-mat]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    B´ evillon, J

    E. B´ evillon, J. P. Colombier, B. Dutta, and R. Stoian, Ab Initio Nonequilibrium Thermodynamic and Trans- port Properties of Ultrafast Laser Irradiated 316L Stain- less Steel, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C119, 11438 (2015)

    2015

  12. [19]

    G. D. Samolyuk, S. Mu, A. F. May, B. C. Sales, S. Wim- mer, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, and G. M. Stocks, Tem- perature dependent electronic transport in concentrated solid solutions of the 3 d -transition metals Ni, Fe, Co and Cr from first principles, Physical Review B98, 165141 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    G. D. Samolyuk, L. K. B´ eland, G. M. Stocks, and R. E. Stoller, Electron–phonon coupling in Ni-based binary al- loys with application to displacement cascade modeling, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter28, 175501 (2016). 13

    2016

  14. [21]

    Medvedev, Stainless steel in an electronically excited state, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 425301 (2025)

    N. Medvedev, Stainless steel in an electronically excited state, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 425301 (2025)

    2025

  15. [22]

    Kiran Kumar, G

    K. Kiran Kumar, G. L. Samuel, and M. S. Shunmugam, Theoretical and experimental investigations of ultra- short pulse laser interaction on Ti6Al4V alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology263, 266 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    L. Peng, M. Li, P. Wang, X. Li, Y. Zhang, M. He, C. Zhou, H. Zhang, and S. Chen, Numerical simulation and investigation of ultra-short pulse laser ablation on Ti6Al4V and stainless steel, AIP Advances13, 065018 (2023)

    2023

  17. [24]

    Y. Chen, H. Sun, G. Lin, S. Song, and P. Ji, Multi- physics modeling femtosecond laser ablation of Ti6Al4V with material transient properties, Journal of Alloys and Compounds1002, 175360 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    M. Li, P. Ji, B. Gao, and X. Li, Electromagnetic, thermal and hydrodynamic investigation of LIPSS formation on Ti6Al4V induced by femtosecond laser processing, Optics & Laser Technology187, 112825 (2025)

    2025

  19. [26]

    Ebert, D

    H. Ebert, D. K¨ odderitzsch, and J. Min´ ar, Calculat- ing condensed matter properties using the KKR-Green’s function method—recent developments and applications, Reports on Progress in Physics74, 096501 (2011)

    2011

  20. [27]

    D. A. Greenwood, The Boltzmann Equation in the The- ory of Electrical Conduction in Metals, Proceedings of the Physical Society71, 585 (1958)

    1958

  21. [28]

    M. J. Verstraete, J. Abreu, G. E. Allemand, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, M. Azizi, L. Baguet, C. Barat, L. Bas- togne, R. B´ ejaud, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, A. Blanchet, F. Bottin, J. Bouchet, J. Bouquiaux, E. Bousquet, J. Boust, F. Brieuc, V. Brousseau-Couture, N. Brouwer, F. Brun...

    2025

  22. [29]

    Korringa, On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal, Physica13, 392 (1947)

    J. Korringa, On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal, Physica13, 392 (1947)

    1947

  23. [30]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  24. [31]

    L¨ utjering and W

    G. L¨ utjering and W. James C.,Titanium, Engineering Materials, Processes (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    2007

  25. [32]

    Lonardelli, N

    I. Lonardelli, N. Gey, H.-R. Wenk, M. Humbert, S. Vogel, and L. Lutterotti, In situ observation of texture evolution during alpha-beta and beta-alpha phase transformations in titanium alloys investigated by neutron diffraction, Acta Materialia55, 5718 (2007)

    2007

  26. [33]

    R. M. Wood, The Lattice Constants of High Purity Alpha Titanium, Proceedings of the Physical Society80, 783 (1962)

    1962

  27. [34]

    Montanari, G

    R. Montanari, G. Costanza, M. Tata, and C. Testani, Lattice expansion of Ti–6Al–4V by nitrogen and oxygen absorption, Materials Characterization59, 334 (2008)

    2008

  28. [35]

    A. K. Swarnakar, O. Van Der Biest, and B. Baufeld, Thermal expansion and lattice parameters of shaped metal deposited Ti–6Al–4V, Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds509, 2723 (2011)

    2011

  29. [36]

    Z. C. Xu and H. Kriegel, The Martensitic Transformation in Ti-6Al-4V, Materials Science Forum914, 140 (2018)

    2018

  30. [37]

    Chen and B

    Q. Chen and B. Sundman, Calculation of debye temper- ature for crystalline structures—a case study on Ti, Zr, and Hf, Acta Materialia49, 947 (2001)

    2001

  31. [38]

    Kerley,Equations of state for titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy., Tech

    G. Kerley,Equations of state for titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy., Tech. Rep. SAND2003-3785, 918300 (2003)

    2003

  32. [39]

    Ebert, S

    H. Ebert, S. Mankovsky, K. Chadova, S. Polesya, J. Mi- nar, and D. Koedderitzsch, Calculating linear response functions for finite temperatures on the basis of the al- loy analogy model, Physical Review B91, 165132 (2015), arXiv:1412.1988 [cond-mat]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [40]

    S´ olyom,Fundamentals of the physics of solids (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    J. S´ olyom,Fundamentals of the physics of solids (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    2009

  34. [41]

    K¨ odderitzsch, K

    D. K¨ odderitzsch, K. Chadova, and H. Ebert, Linear re- sponse Kubo-Bastin formalism with application to the anomalous and spin Hall effects: A first-principles ap- proach, Physical Review B92, 184415 (2015)

    2015

  35. [42]

    Jonson and G

    M. Jonson and G. D. Mahan, Mott’s formula for the ther- mopower and the Wiedemann-Franz law, Physical Re- view B21, 4223 (1980)

    1980

  36. [43]

    Ricci, W

    F. Ricci, W. Chen, U. Aydemir, G. J. Snyder, G.-M. Rignanese, A. Jain, and G. Hautier, An ab initio elec- tronic transport database for inorganic materials, Scien- tific Data4, 170085 (2017)

    2017

  37. [44]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  38. [45]

    Van Setten, M

    M. Van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Ver- straete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Com- puter Physics Communications226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  39. [46]

    G. E. Allemand, M. Giantomassi, and M. J. Verstraete, First-principles calculations of transport coefficients in the Weyl semimetal TaAs, Physical Review B112, 125122 (2025), publisher: American Physical Society

    2025

  40. [47]

    Brunin, H

    G. Brunin, H. P. C. Miranda, M. Giantomassi, M. Royo, M. Stengel, M. J. Verstraete, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hautier, Electron-Phonon beyond Fr¨ ohlich: Dy- namical Quadrupoles in Polar and Covalent Solids, Phys- ical Review Letters125, 136601 (2020)

    2020

  41. [48]

    Brunin, H

    G. Brunin, H. P. C. Miranda, M. Giantomassi, M. Royo, M. Stengel, M. J. Verstraete, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rig- nanese, and G. Hautier, Phonon-limited electron mobility in Si, GaAs, and GaP with exact treatment of dynamical quadrupoles, Physical Review B102, 094308 (2020)

    2020

  42. [49]

    Paltauf and P

    G. Paltauf and P. E. Dyer, Photomechanical Processes and Effects in Ablation, Chemical Reviews103, 487 (2003)

    2003

  43. [50]

    Wu and L

    C. Wu and L. V. Zhigilei, Microscopic mechanisms of laser spallation and ablation of metal targets from large- scale molecular dynamics simulations, Applied Physics A 114, 11 (2014)

    2014

  44. [51]

    P. B. Allen, Neutron Spectroscopy of Superconductors, Physical Review B6, 2577 (1972)

    1972

  45. [52]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition Temperature of Strong- Coupled Superconductors, Physical Review167, 331 14 (1968)

    1968

  46. [53]

    Johnson and R

    P. Johnson and R. Christy, Optical constants of transi- tion metals: Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Pd, Physical Review B9, 5056 (1974)

    1974

  47. [54]

    Winter, M

    J. Winter, M. Spellauge, J. Hermann, C. Eulenkamp, H. P. Huber, and M. Schmidt, Ultrashort single-pulse laser ablation of stainless steel, aluminium, copper and its dependence on the pulse duration, Optics Express29, 14561 (2021)

    2021

  48. [55]

    COMSOL Multiphysics (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    Rethfeld, K

    B. Rethfeld, K. Sokolowski-Tinten, D. Von Der Linde, and S. I. Anisimov, Ultrafast thermal melting of laser- excited solids by homogeneous nucleation, Physical Re- view B65, 092103 (2002)

    2002

  50. [58]

    E. A. Bel’skaya, An Experimental Investigation of the Electrical Resistivity of Titanium in the Temperature Range from 77 to 1600 K, High Temperature43, 546 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    Kontrym-Sznajd and S

    G. Kontrym-Sznajd and S. B. Dugdale, How to esti- mate isotropic distributions and mean values in crys- talline solids, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter27, 435501 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    H. C. Robarts, T. E. Millichamp, D. A. Lagos, J. Lave- rock, D. Billington, J. A. Duffy, D. O’Neill, S. R. Giblin, J. W. Taylor, G. Kontrym-Sznajd, M. Samsel-Czeka la, H. Bei, S. Mu, G. D. Samolyuk, G. M. Stocks, and S. B. Dugdale, Extreme Fermi Surface Smearing in a Maxi- mal...

    2020

  53. [61]

    J. M. Luttinger, Fermi Surface and Some Simple Equi- librium Properties of a System of Interacting Fermions, Physical Review119, 1153 (1960)

    1960

  54. [62]

    Souvatzis, O

    P. Souvatzis, O. Eriksson, and M. I. Katsnelson, Anoma- lous Thermal Expansion inα-Titanium, Physical Review Letters99, 015901 (2007)

    2007

  55. [63]

    E. A. Belskaya, Emissivity and electrical resistivity of ti- tanium alloys with aluminum and vanadium, High Tem- perature50, 475 (2012)

    2012

  56. [64]

    C. D. Woodgate, H. J. Naguszewski, D. Redka, J. Min´ ar, D. Quigley, and J. B. Staunton, Emergent B2 chemi- cal orderings in the AlTiVNb and AlTiCrMo refractory high-entropy superalloys studied via first-principles the- ory and atomistic modelling, Journal of Physics: Mate- ri...

    2025

  57. [65]

    Samolyuk, A

    G. Samolyuk, A. Shyam, and M. Yoon, A first princi- ples approach for determining solute effect on electrical resistivity of Aluminum solid solution, Scripta Materialia 274, 117138 (2026)

    2026

  58. [66]

    J. J. Quinn and R. A. Ferrell, Electron Self-Energy Ap- proach to Correlation in a Degenerate Electron Gas, Physical Review112, 812 (1958)

    1958

  59. [67]

    Pecker, S

    S. Pecker, S. Eliezer, D. Fisher, Z. Henis, and Z. Zina- mon, A multiphase equation of state of three solid phases, liquid, and gas for titanium, Journal of Applied Physics 98, 043516 (2005)

    2005

  60. [68]

    Mannion, J

    P. Mannion, J. Magee, E. Coyne, G. O’Connor, and T. Glynn, The effect of damage accumulation behaviour on ablation thresholds and damage morphology in ul- trafast laser micro-machining of common metals in air, Applied Surface Science233, 275 (2004)

    2004

  61. [69]

    Maharjan, W

    N. Maharjan, W. Zhou, Y. Zhou, and Y. Guan, Ablation morphology and ablation threshold of Ti-6Al-4V alloy during femtosecond laser processing, Applied Physics A 124, 519 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    T. Endo, S. Tani, H. Sakurai, and Y. Kobayashi, Prob- ing thermal dissipation dimensionality to laser ablation in the pulse duration range from 300 fs to 1µs, Optics Express31, 36027 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    L. V. Zhigilei, Z. Lin, and D. S. Ivanov, Atomistic Model- ing of Short Pulse Laser Ablation of Metals: Connections between Melting, Spallation, and Phase Explosion, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C113, 11892 (2009)

    2009

  64. [72]

    Casas, N

    J. Casas, N. M. K´ eita, and S. G. Steinemann, Sound Velocity in Liquid Titanium, Vanadium and Chromium, Physics and Chemistry of Liquids14, 155 (1984)

    1984

  65. [73]

    P. B. Corkum, F. Brunel, N. K. Sherman, and T. Srinivasan-Rao, Thermal Response of Metals to Ultrashort-Pulse Laser Excitation, Physical Review Let- ters61, 2886 (1988)

    1988

  66. [74]

    Redka, J

    D. Redka, J. Winter, C. Gadelmeier, A. Djuranovic, U. Glatzel, J. Min´ ar, and H. P. Huber, Control of ultra- fast laser ablation efficiency by stress confinement due to strong electron localization in high-entropy alloys, Ap- plied Surface Science594, 153427 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Ivanov and B

    D. Ivanov and B. Rethfeld, The effect of pulse dura- tion on the interplay of electron heat conduction and electron–phonon interaction: Photo-mechanical versus photo-thermal damage of metal targets, Applied Surface Science255, 9724 (2009)

    2009

  68. [76]

    B. N. Chicbkov, C. Momma, and S. Nolte, Femtosecond, picosecond and nanosecond laser ablation of solids, Ap- plied physics A63(1996)

    1996

  69. [77]

    Wellershoff, J

    S.-S. Wellershoff, J. Hohlfeld, J. G¨ udde, and E. Matthias, The role of electron–phonon coupling in femtosecond laser damage of metals:, Applied Physics A Materials Sci- ence & Processing69, S99 (1999)

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.