Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 68 references

Excitonic effects in the photocarriers dynamics of two-dimensional materials

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Excitonic correlations, not free-carrier physics, determine the final carrier distribution in photoexcited WSe2.

desk verdict The mechanism is plausible and the SEPE reduction is a real internal check, but the thermalized-exciton claim rests on a 1.3 ps snapshot without convergence evidence; the paper deserves review but needs supporting details and a cleaner ARPES comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18183 v1 pith:N7SEODVC submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Carlos Betancur , Gianluca Stefanucci , Enrico Perfetto This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords excitonicBlochequationsWSe2monolayercarrierrelaxationintervalleyscatteringexciton-phononcouplingtime-resolvedARPESthermalizationBethe-Salpeterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that when electrons and holes are created in a semiconductor, treating them as independent quasiparticles misses the dominant relaxation channel. Using a two-particle framework built on excitonic Bloch equations, the authors compute the coupled evolution of electron-hole pair states in monolayer WSe2, including phonon scattering and exciton formation. They find that carriers quickly convert into bound excitons, which scatter strongly between valleys and settle into a correlated quasi-equilibrium whose momentum distribution is shaped by exciton wavefunctions rather than by Fermi–Dirac statistics. This explains why experimentally the Q valleys host more carriers than the K valleys, whereas single-particle Boltzmann-type simulations predict the opposite. The result implies that standard single-particle relaxation frameworks are inadequate for excitonic materials even at low excitation densities.

What carries the argument

The excitonic Bloch equations (XBE): a Markovian set of equations for the occupations of all electron-hole eigenstates of the finite-momentum Bethe–Salpeter equation, including both bound excitons and unbound pairs. The key ingredients are T-matrix vertex corrections to the Fan–Migdal electron-phonon self-energy, a decomposition of occupations into coherent (polarization) and incoherent parts, and auxiliary irreducible electron-hole occupations that prevent overscreening. The bridge to observable carrier distributions is the projection formula f_ck = sum_{λQv} N^{λQ} |A^{λQ}_{cvk}|^2, which maps the bosonic exciton occupations onto fermionic single-particle distributions.

What would settle it

Time-resolved ARPES at delays beyond a few picoseconds showing the K/Q valley ratio returning toward the single-particle prediction (K over Q), or a numerical test demonstrating that the XBE occupations depend on the initial excitation conditions instead of converging to the same Bose–Einstein distribution, would falsify the claim of an excitonic quasi-equilibrium steady state.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the long-time state of a photoexcited excitonic semiconductor is not a thermalized gas of independent electrons and holes. Within the excitonic Bloch equations, the occupation numbers of electron-hole eigenstates of the finite-momentum Bethe–Salpeter equation thermalize to a Bose–Einstein distribution at the lattice temperature; projecting these occupations onto single-particle states yields distributions that inherit the momentum-space structure of the lowest-energy exciton wavefunction. The paper further shows that when bound exciton states are neglected, the equations reduce exactly to conventional semiconductor electron-phonon (Boltzmann) equations, establishing

Load-bearing premise

The Markovian scattering rates in the excitonic Bloch equations drive the exciton occupations to a Bose–Einstein distribution at the fixed lattice temperature within the simulated 1–1.75 ps window, so the computed distributions are the true asymptotic state rather than a slowly evolving transient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-particle Boltzmann and semiconductor Bloch simulations of 2D semiconductors can qualitatively mispredict valley populations and the direction of intervalley transfer.
  • Long-time carrier distributions in excitonic materials cannot be fit by a Fermi–Dirac function at any temperature, so analyses assigning 'effective carrier temperatures' to such data are misleading.
  • Exciton formation begins reshaping the dynamics within a few hundred femtoseconds, i.e., during a typical pump pulse, not only at late times.
  • The XBE framework provides a route to directly compute momentum-resolved carrier populations that can be compared to time-resolved ARPES without ad-hoc thermal models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the thermalized state is indeed a Bose–Einstein distribution of dark excitons, then valley and momentum-resolved photoemission at late delays is effectively imaging the exciton wavefunction, suggesting a general spectroscopy of exciton structure in momentum space.
  • The paper's finding that the Q vs K imbalance is driven by phase-space multiplicity (six Q valleys vs two K) rather than band energies implies that valleytronic devices based on TMDs must account for excitonic scattering channels, not only single-particle phonon scattering.
  • The claimed independence of the final state from the excitation protocol (sudden vs pump) is a testable prediction: experiments varying pump photon energy and duration should still converge to the same non-thermal steady state within a few picoseconds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an excitonic Bloch equations (XBE) framework, based on the authors' prior work (Ref. 51), to describe phonon-driven carrier dynamics in photoexcited WSe2 monolayers. The central claims are: (i) XBE reduce to standard single-particle electron–phonon equations (SEPE) when bound exciton states are neglected, providing a consistency check; (ii) for non-resonant excitation at low density, excitonic correlations cause rapid intervalley scattering that populates Q valleys over K valleys, in agreement with time-resolved ARPES; and (iii) the long-time carrier distributions are shaped by exciton wavefunctions rather than Fermi–Dirac statistics, signaling a correlated quasi-equilibrium. The paper compares sudden-excitation and finite-pulse protocols, reporting a K-to-Q ratio of about 0.3 and nearly identical final distributions in both cases.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper challenges the standard single-particle relaxation picture for excitonic semiconductors, identifying exciton formation as a dominant relaxation channel even at low density and explaining the experimentally observed Q-valley population. The analytical reduction of XBE to SEPE when bound states are discarded is a genuine consistency check, and the qualitative mechanism — near-degenerate K/Q excitons combined with sixfold Q multiplicity — is clearly argued and plausible. The use of two excitation protocols (sudden and pump) and the explicit treatment of coherent and incoherent populations are additional strengths. However, the quantitative claims of thermalization and ARPES agreement require stronger numerical and methodological support. The paper is potentially significant but not yet fully convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 (sudden excitation); Eqs. (3)–(5), Fig. 3e–f] The central asymptotic claim is asserted but not demonstrated. After 'approximately 1 ps' the text says occupations are only 'evolving slowly toward their asymptotic values', yet Fig. 3f at 1.3 ps is presented as the steady state. No convergence study is shown, no detailed-balance check of the Markovian rates in Eq. (5) is provided, and no comparison is made with the Bose–Einstein fixed point at energies E^{λQ}. Until the integration is shown to have reached (or tightly approached) that fixed point, the exciton-wavefunction shape and the K-to-Q ratio ~0.3 could be transient relaxation features. I request a time-convergence analysis and a detailed-balance or fixed-point validation.
  2. [§4 (pump excitation); ARPES comparison] The stated quantitative agreement with time-resolved ARPES rests on an undocumented post-processing of Ref. 52. The paper reports a K-to-Q ratio of ~0.3 without specifying how populations were extracted from the experimental spectra — e.g., energy/momentum integration windows, background subtraction, valley assignment, spin/degeneracy factors, or experimental error bars. Without this information the 'quantitative agreement' claim cannot be evaluated. The authors should either provide the extraction procedure in detail or soften the claim to qualitative consistency.
  3. [§2, after Eq. (3)] The statement that 'the occupations N^{λQ} thermalize according to a Bose–Einstein distribution evaluated at the e–h energies E^{λQ}' is inherited from Ref. 51, but the conditions under which Eq. (5) has this fixed point — e.g., detailed balance of the Γ rates and conservation of total pair number — are not stated or verified. Since this fixed-point property is the basis for the claim that f^c_k and f^v_k take exciton-wavefunction shapes, it should be made explicit and checked numerically for the actual rates used.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The momentum argument in f^c_k uses A^{λQ}_{cvk-Q} while f^v_k uses A^{λQ}_{cvk}. Please clarify the convention, since this notation is potentially confusing.
  2. [§4, pump excitation] Typo: 'intead' should be 'instead'.
  3. [§4, first paragraph] The citation appears as 'Ref.,52'; should be 'Ref. [52]'.
  4. [Fig. 3e caption] The notation |Ψ^A_{e/h}(E)|² is used but not defined. Define it in the caption or main text.
  5. [Supporting Note 3] The XBE-to-SEPE reduction is a central result and is only cited to a Supporting Note. Please ensure this derivation is fully available and cross-referenced, as it underlies the interpretation of XBE–SEPE differences as bound-state effects.
  6. [Conclusions] The sentence 'the lowest-energy excitons are all dark' should be reconciled with the discussion of bright states in Eq. (4); a brief explanation of why dark excitons dominate the thermalized population would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main numerical predictions are emergent and externally benchmarked; only a minor reliance on the authors' prior XBE thermalization result.

full rationale

The central observable predictions—enhanced intervalley scattering, Q-valley dominance, and K/Q ≈ 0.3—are produced by numerically solving the XBE equations with first-principles WSe2 band structure and BSE exciton wavefunctions; they are not fitted to the ARPES data and are benchmarked against the independent experiment of Ref. 52. The XBE formalism is adopted from the authors' own Ref. 51, including the assertion that occupations N^λQ thermalize to a Bose–Einstein distribution at the lattice temperature; the paper does not re-derive this fixed point or show a detailed-balance/convergence check for its 1.3–1.75 ps snapshots. This is a genuine reliance on prior self-citation and a correctness concern, but it is not a definitional circularity: Eq. (3) is a projection formula, and the claim that the resulting distributions are exciton-wavefunction-shaped rather than Fermi–Dirac is a nontrivial consequence that the paper explicitly tests against Fermi–Dirac fits (Fig. 3f). No equation is defined in terms of the target result, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the equivalence between XBE and SEPE in the dilute limit is a self-consistency check rather than a circular inference. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular; the main weakness is an unverified imported thermalization assertion, not a reduction of the prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the target result (K/Q ≈ 0.3); the listed parameters are experimental-condition inputs chosen to match Ref 52. No invented entities ('bound' vs 'free' electrons are bookkeeping definitions from the BSE bound/continuum split). The load-bearing postulates are the inherited XBE framework (Ref 51), the noninteracting-pair treatment of the continuum, the accuracy of the GW-BSE exciton landscape, the fixed phonon reservoir, and convergence of the dynamics by ~1 ps.

free parameters (4)
  • Lattice temperature T_L = 70 K
    Hand-set to match the ARPES experiment; sets the quantitative envelopes of the final fe(E)/fh(E) but not the qualitative non-Fermi-Dirac shape, which derives from exciton degeneracy and valley multiplicity.
  • Excitation density n = 10^11 cm^-2
    Chosen to match Ref 52 and to justify the 'no lattice heating' approximation.
  • Pump photon energy and duration = 2.4 eV, 250 fs, fluence tuned to n
    Chosen to mirror the non-resonant conditions of Ref 52; not fitted to the target K/Q ratio.
  • Initial hot-carrier distribution width = not stated in main text
    A narrow Gaussian centered at 2.4 eV; the width is set in Supporting Note 4 and affects only the early transient (t < 100 fs).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The XBE of Ref 51 (Eq. 5) correctly capture coupled e-h + phonon dynamics under a Markovian T-matrix treatment, including the claimed thermalization of N^λQ to Bose–Einstein at the lattice temperature.
    The central dynamical equations and the long-time statement are inherited from the authors' prior paper (Ref 51) and are not re-derived in this manuscript.
  • domain assumption The e-h continuum is approximated as noninteracting pairs (A^λQ ≈ δ_{c,cλ} δ_{v,vλ} δ_{k,kλ}).
    Stated in 'Results and discussion'; enables the claimed exact reduction XBE→SEPE in the free-carrier limit, but fixes the free-carrier sector at single-particle (Fan–Migdal) accuracy by construction.
  • domain assumption The GW-BSE input is quantitatively accurate: ~40 meV Q–K conduction splitting, near-degenerate K/Q excitons, and all low-lying excitons dark.
    The Q-over-K prediction (factor ~3) follows from this near-degeneracy plus the sixfold Q-valley multiplicity; the simulation details are deferred to Supporting Note 4, absent from the provided text.
  • domain assumption The phonon bath remains at fixed T = 70 K (no lattice heating).
    Stated as an 'excellent approximation' at n = 10^11 cm^-2; the BE-at-T_L fixed point requires the reservoir to stay cold.
  • ad hoc to paper The 1–1.75 ps simulation window is close to the asymptotic fixed point of the rate equations.
    The text describes occupations at 1.3 ps as 'quasi-stationary, evolving slowly toward their asymptotic values'; the steady-state claim is therefore an extrapolation, with no convergence analysis shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Excitonic effects in the photocarriers dynamics of two-dimensional materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N7SEODVC

@misc{pith2026260718183,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Excitonic effects in the photocarriers dynamics of two-dimensional materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N7SEODVC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18183}
}
abstract

We investigate the role of excitonic correlations in shaping the ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited carriers in semiconductors. Conventional approaches describe relaxation within single-particle frameworks, where electron-electron and electron-phonon scattering drive thermalization toward Fermi-Dirac distributions, neglecting electron-hole correlations that dominate near band edges. We introduce a two-particle framework based on excitonic Bloch equations (XBE) that captures carrier-phonon scattering and explicitly accounts for exciton formation. Applying this approach to non-resonantly photoexcited WSe$_2$ monolayers, we reveal qualitatively different carrier relaxation pathways: in contrast to state-of-the-art methods, XBE predict enhanced intervalley scattering and dominant carrier population in Q valleys over K valleys, in agreement with time-resolved ARPES experiments. Moreover, the momentum distribution of thermalized carriers is shaped by exciton wavefunctions rather than by Fermi-Dirac statistics, signaling the formation of a correlated nonequilibrium state. These results establish excitonic correlations as a key mechanism governing photocarrier dynamics in excitonic materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18183 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Panel a: Schematic of carrier dynamics following above-bandgap photoexcitation. Photoexcited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Density plot of the momentum-resolved conduction-band occupation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Carrier dynamics following the sudden excitation. Panel a: Time-dependent carrier populations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density plot of the momentum-resolved conduction-band occupation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Carrier dynamics following the pump excitation. Panel a: Time-dependent carrier populations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Caruso, F. et al. The 2025 roadmap to ultrafast dynamics: frontiers of theoretical and computational modeling.Journal of Physics: Materials2025,9, 012501

    2025

  2. [2]

    Ponseca, C. S. J.; Chábera, P.; Uhlig, J.; Persson, P.; Sundström, V. Ultrafast Electron Dynamics in Solar Energy Conversion.Chemical Reviews2017,117, 10940–11024

  3. [3]

    J.; Tang, J

    Ma, J.; Miao, T. J.; Tang, J. Charge carrier dynamics and reaction intermediates in heterogeneous photocatalysis by time-resolved spectroscopies.Chem. Soc. Rev.2022,51, 5777–5794

    2022

  4. [4]

    The charge carrier dynamics, efficiency and stability of two-dimensional material-based perovskite solar cells.Chem

    Wang, B.; Iocozzia, J.; Zhang, M.; Ye, M.; Yan, S.; Jin, H.; Wang, S.; Zou, Z.; Lin, Z. The charge carrier dynamics, efficiency and stability of two-dimensional material-based perovskite solar cells.Chem. Soc. Rev.2019,48, 4854–4891

    2019

  5. [5]

    From Ultrafast to Ultraslow: Charge-Carrier Dynamics of Perovskite Solar Cells.Joule2018,2, 879–901

    Shi, J.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Luo, Y.; Wu, H.; Meng, Q. From Ultrafast to Ultraslow: Charge-Carrier Dynamics of Perovskite Solar Cells.Joule2018,2, 879–901

  6. [6]

    B.; Richter, C.; Schmuttenmaer, C

    Baxter, J. B.; Richter, C.; Schmuttenmaer, C. A. Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics in Nanostructures for Solar Fuels.Annual Review of Physical Chemistry2014,65, 423–447

  7. [7]

    W.Quantum Theory of the Optical and Electronic Properties of Semiconductors; World Scientific: Singapore, 1994

    Haug, H.; ; Koch, S. W.Quantum Theory of the Optical and Electronic Properties of Semiconductors; World Scientific: Singapore, 1994

    1994

  8. [8]

    W.; Kira,M.; Khitrova,G.; Gibbs,H

    Koch,S. W.; Kira,M.; Khitrova,G.; Gibbs,H. M.Semiconductorexcitonsin newlight.Nature Materials 2006,5, 523–531

    2006

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Many-body correlations and excitonic effects in semiconductor spectroscopy.Progress in Quantum Electronics2006,30, 155–296

    Kira, M.; Koch, S. Many-body correlations and excitonic effects in semiconductor spectroscopy.Progress in Quantum Electronics2006,30, 155–296

  2. [10]

    Li, M.; Fu, J.; Xu, Q.; Sum, T. C. Slow Hot-Carrier Cooling in Halide Perovskites: Prospects for Hot-Carrier Solar Cells.Advanced Materials2019,31, 1802486

  3. [11]

    Pogna, E. A. A. et al. Hot-Carrier Cooling in High-Quality Graphene Is Intrinsically Limited by Optical Phonons.ACS Nano2021,15, 11285–11295

  4. [12]

    W.; Shen, Z.; Prezhdo, O

    Nie, Z.; Long, R.; Sun, L.; Huang, C.-C.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, Q.; Hewak, D. W.; Shen, Z.; Prezhdo, O. V.; Loh, Z.-H. Ultrafast carrier thermalization and cooling dynamics in few-layer MoS2.ACS nano2014, 8, 10931–10940

  5. [13]

    How many-particle interactions develop after ultrafast excitation of an electron–hole plasma.Nature2001,414, 286–289

    Huber, R.; Tauser, F.; Brodschelm, A.; Bichler, M.; Abstreiter, G.; Leitenstorfer, A. How many-particle interactions develop after ultrafast excitation of an electron–hole plasma.Nature2001,414, 286–289

  6. [14]

    Real-TimeGW: Toward an Ab Initio Description of the Ultrafast Carrier and Exciton Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Materials.Phys

    Perfetto, E.; Pavlyukh, Y.; Stefanucci, G. Real-TimeGW: Toward an Ab Initio Description of the Ultrafast Carrier and Exciton Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Materials.Phys. Rev. Lett.2022,128, 016801

    2022

  7. [15]

    Theory of ultrafast screening ofUin driven charge- transfer insulators: A time-resolved x-ray absorption study.Phys

    Golež, D.; Paprotzki, E.; Werner, P.; Eckstein, M. Theory of ultrafast screening ofUin driven charge- transfer insulators: A time-resolved x-ray absorption study.Phys. Rev. B2025,111, 045147

  8. [16]

    M.; Petek, H

    Hase, M.; Kitajima, M.; Constantinescu, A. M.; Petek, H. The birth of a quasiparticle in silicon observed in time–frequency space.Nature2003,426, 51–54 11

  9. [17]

    Novelli, F. et al. Witnessing the formation and relaxation of dressed quasi-particles in a strongly corre- lated electron system.Nature Communications2014,5, 5112

  10. [18]

    Direct Observation of Ultrafast Exciton Formation in a Monolayer of WSe2.Nano Letters2017,17, 1455–1460

    Steinleitner, P.; Merkl, P.; Nagler, P.; Mornhinweg, J.; Schüller, C.; Korn, T.; Chernikov, A.; Huber, R. Direct Observation of Ultrafast Exciton Formation in a Monolayer of WSe2.Nano Letters2017,17, 1455–1460

  11. [19]

    Z.; Zhao, H

    Ceballos, F.; Cui, Q.; Bellus, M. Z.; Zhao, H. Exciton formation in monolayer transition metal dichalco- genides.Nanoscale2016,8, 11681–11688

  12. [20]

    H.; Sim, S.; Park, J.; Heo, H.; Jo, M.-H.; Choi, H

    Cha, S.; Sung, J. H.; Sim, S.; Park, J.; Heo, H.; Jo, M.-H.; Choi, H. 1s-intraexcitonic dynamics in monolayer MoS2 probed by ultrafast mid-infrared spectroscopy.Nature Communications2016,7, 10768

  13. [21]

    E.; Comegys, O.; Quintanar, L

    Eroglu, Z. E.; Comegys, O.; Quintanar, L. S.; Azam, N.; Elafandi, S.; Mahjouri-Samani, M.; Boules- baa, A. Ultrafast dynamics of exciton formation and decay in two-dimensional tungsten disulfide (2D- WS2) monolayers.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2020,22, 17385–17393

    2020

  14. [22]

    and Selig, Malte and Yao, Kaiyuan and Borrego-Varillas, Rocio and Scotognella, Francesco and Kriegel, Ilka and Yan, Aiming and Zettl, Alex and Schuck, P

    Trovatello, Chiara and Katsch, Florian and Borys, Nicholas J. and Selig, Malte and Yao, Kaiyuan and Borrego-Varillas, Rocio and Scotognella, Francesco and Kriegel, Ilka and Yan, Aiming and Zettl, Alex and Schuck, P. James and Knorr, Andreas and Cerullo, Giulio and Dal Conte, S...

  15. [23]

    Momentum-Resolved Observation of Exciton Formation Dynamics in Monolayer WS2.Nano Letters2021,21, 5867–5873

    Wallauer, R.; Perea-Causin, R.; Münster, L.; Zajusch, S.; Brem, S.; Güdde, J.; Tanimura, K.; Lin, K.- Q.; Huber, R.; Malic, E.; Höfer, U. Momentum-Resolved Observation of Exciton Formation Dynamics in Monolayer WS2.Nano Letters2021,21, 5867–5873

  16. [24]

    F.; Tuniz, M.; Puntel, D.; Bronsch, W.; Cilento, F.; Pagliara, S

    Gosetti, V.; Cervantes-Villanueva, J.; Mor, S.; Sangalli, D.; García-Cristóbal, A.; Molina-Sánchez, A.; Agekyan, V. F.; Tuniz, M.; Puntel, D.; Bronsch, W.; Cilento, F.; Pagliara, S. Unveiling the exciton formation in time, energy and momentum domain in layered van der Waals se...

  17. [25]

    V.Progress in Ultrafast Intense Laser Science: Volume V; Springer, 2009; pp 23–46

    Ishioka, K.; Misochko, O. V.Progress in Ultrafast Intense Laser Science: Volume V; Springer, 2009; pp 23–46

    2009

  18. [26]

    Trovatello, C. et al. Strongly Coupled Coherent Phonons in Single-Layer MoS2.ACS Nano2020,14, 5700–5710

  19. [27]

    J.; Genco, A.; Trovatello, C.; Conte, S

    Sayers, C. J.; Genco, A.; Trovatello, C.; Conte, S. D.; Khaustov, V.; Cervantes-Villanueva, J.; San- galli, D.; Molina-Sanchez, A.; Coletti, C.; Gadermaier, C.; others Strong Coupling of Coherent Phonons to Excitons in Semiconducting Monolayer MoTe _2.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302...

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    E.; Ernstor- fer, R

    Vasileiadis, T.; Waldecker, L.; Foster, D.; Da Silva, A.; Zahn, D.; Bertoni, R.; Palmer, R. E.; Ernstor- fer, R. Ultrafast Heat Flow in Heterostructures of Au Nanoclusters on Thin Films: Atomic Disorder Induced by Hot Electrons.ACS Nano2018,12, 7710–7720

  21. [29]

    K.; Cui, Y.; Din, N

    Chang, H.-T.; Guggenmos, A.; Cushing, S. K.; Cui, Y.; Din, N. U.; Acharya, S. R.; Molesky, I. J. P.; Kleineberg, U.; Turkowski, V.; Rahman, T. S.; Neumark, D. M.; Leone, S. R. Electron thermalization and relaxation in laser-heated nickel by few-femtosecond core-level transient...

  22. [30]

    Stefanucci, G.; van Leeuwen, R.Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems: A Modern Introduction; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2013

    2013

  23. [31]

    P.; Baym, G

    Kadanoff, L. P.; Baym, G. A.Quantum statistical mechanics: Green’s function methods in equilibrium and nonequilibirum problems; Benjamin, 1962

    1962

  24. [32]

    In and Out-of-Equilibrium Ab Initio Theory of Electrons and Phonons.Phys

    Stefanucci, G.; van Leeuwen, R.; Perfetto, E. In and Out-of-Equilibrium Ab Initio Theory of Electrons and Phonons.Phys. Rev. X2023,13, 031026 12

  25. [33]

    Time-linear scaling nonequi- librium Green’s function methods for real-time simulations of interacting electrons and bosons

    Pavlyukh, Y.; Perfetto, E.; Karlsson, D.; van Leeuwen, R.; Stefanucci, G. Time-linear scaling nonequi- librium Green’s function methods for real-time simulations of interacting electrons and bosons. I. For- malism.Phys. Rev. B2022,105, 125134

  26. [34]

    Time-linear scaling nonequilib- rium Green’s function method for real-time simulations of interacting electrons and bosons

    Pavlyukh, Y.; Perfetto, E.; Karlsson, D.; van Leeuwen, R.; Stefanucci, G. Time-linear scaling nonequilib- rium Green’s function method for real-time simulations of interacting electrons and bosons. II. Dynamics of polarons and doublons.Phys. Rev. B2022,105, 125135

  27. [35]

    Real-Time GW-Ehrenfest-Fan-Migdal Method for Nonequilibrium 2D Ma- terials.Nano Letters2023,23, 7029–7036

    Perfetto, E.; Stefanucci, G. Real-Time GW-Ehrenfest-Fan-Migdal Method for Nonequilibrium 2D Ma- terials.Nano Letters2023,23, 7029–7036

  28. [36]

    Semiconductor electron-phonon equations: A rung above Boltzmann in the many-body ladder.SciPost Phys.2024,16, 073

    Stefanucci, G.; Perfetto, E. Semiconductor electron-phonon equations: A rung above Boltzmann in the many-body ladder.SciPost Phys.2024,16, 073

    2024

  29. [37]

    Hot-electron relaxation: An exactly solvable model and improved quantum kinetic equations.Phys

    Meden, V.; Wöhler, C.; Fricke, J.; Schönhammer, K. Hot-electron relaxation: An exactly solvable model and improved quantum kinetic equations.Phys. Rev. B1995,52, 5624–5636

  30. [38]

    Microscopic theory of absorption and ultrafast many- particle kinetics in graphene.Phys

    Malic, E.; Winzer, T.; Bobkin, E.; Knorr, A. Microscopic theory of absorption and ultrafast many- particle kinetics in graphene.Phys. Rev. B2011,84, 205406

  31. [39]

    Marini, A. Competition between the electronic and phonon–mediated scattering channels in the out–of–equilibrium carrier dynamics of semiconductors: an ab-initio approach.Journal of Physics: Con- ference Series2013,427, 012003

  32. [40]

    Complete collisions approximation to the Kadanoff-Baym equation: a first- principles implementation.Journal of Physics: Conference Series2015,609, 012006

    Sangalli, D.; Marini, A. Complete collisions approximation to the Kadanoff-Baym equation: a first- principles implementation.Journal of Physics: Conference Series2015,609, 012006

  33. [41]

    Mocatti, S.; Marini, G.; Volpato, G.; Cudazzo, P.; Calandra, M. Nonequilibrium photocarrier and phonon dynamics from first principles: a unified treatment of carrier-carrier, carrier-phonon, and phonon-phonon scattering.npj Computational Materials2026,

  34. [42]

    Ultrafast photoluminescence in metals: Theory and its application to silver.Phys

    Ono, S.; Suemoto, T. Ultrafast photoluminescence in metals: Theory and its application to silver.Phys. Rev. B2020,102, 024308

  35. [43]

    Toward precise simulations of the coupled ultrafast dynamics of electrons and atomic vibrations in materials.Phys

    Tong, X.; Bernardi, M. Toward precise simulations of the coupled ultrafast dynamics of electrons and atomic vibrations in materials.Phys. Rev. Res.2021,3, 023072

    2021

  36. [44]

    J.; Woodward, C

    Yao, J.; Maliyov, I.; Gardner, D. J.; Woodward, C. S.; Bernardi, M. Advancing simulations of cou- pled electron and phonon nonequilibrium dynamics using adaptive and multirate time integration.npj Computational Materials2025,11, 256

  37. [45]

    Nonequilibrium Lattice Dynamics in Monolayer MoS2.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters2021,12, 1734–1740

    Caruso, F. Nonequilibrium Lattice Dynamics in Monolayer MoS2.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters2021,12, 1734–1740

  38. [46]

    Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model to the time-dependent Boltzmann equation.Advances in Physics: X2022,7, 2095925

    Caruso, F.; Novko, D. Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model to the time-dependent Boltzmann equation.Advances in Physics: X2022,7, 2095925

  39. [47]

    Fast Green’s Function Method for Ultrafast Electron-Boson Dynamics.Phys

    Karlsson, D.; van Leeuwen, R.; Pavlyukh, Y.; Perfetto, E.; Stefanucci, G. Fast Green’s Function Method for Ultrafast Electron-Boson Dynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett.2021,127, 036402

    2021

  40. [48]

    M.; Kuhn, T

    Siantidis, K.; Axt, V. M.; Kuhn, T. Dynamics of exciton formation for near band-gap excitations.Phys. Rev. B2001,65, 035303

  41. [49]

    Dynamics of exciton formation and relaxation in photoexcited semicon- ductors.Phys

    Janković, V.; Vukmirović, N. Dynamics of exciton formation and relaxation in photoexcited semicon- ductors.Phys. Rev. B2015,92, 235208

  42. [50]

    Exciton Relaxation Cascade in two-dimensional Transi- tion Metal Dichalcogenides.Scientific Reports2018,8, 8238

    Brem, S.; Selig, M.; Berghaeuser, G.; Malic, E. Exciton Relaxation Cascade in two-dimensional Transi- tion Metal Dichalcogenides.Scientific Reports2018,8, 8238

  43. [51]

    Excitonic Bloch equations from first principles.SciPost Phys.2025,18, 009 13

    Stefanucci, G.; Perfetto, E. Excitonic Bloch equations from first principles.SciPost Phys.2025,18, 009 13

    2025

  44. [52]

    Madéo, J.; Man, M. K. L.; Sahoo, C.; Campbell, M.; Pareek, V.; Wong, E. L.; Al-Mahboob, A.; Chan, N. S.; Karmakar, A.; Mariserla, B. M. K.; Li, X.; Heinz, T. F.; Cao, T.; Dani, K. M. Directly vi- sualizing the momentum-forbidden dark excitons and their dynamics in atomically t...

  45. [53]

    Thränhardt, A.; Kuckenburg, S.; Knorr, A.; Meier, T.; Koch, S. W. Quantum theory of phonon-assisted exciton formation and luminescence in semiconductor quantum wells.Phys. Rev. B2000,62, 2706–2720

  46. [54]

    An ab-initio approach to describe coherent and non-coherent exciton dynamics.The European Physical Journal B2018,91, 171

    Sangalli, D.; Perfetto, E.; Stefanucci, G.; Marini, A. An ab-initio approach to describe coherent and non-coherent exciton dynamics.The European Physical Journal B2018,91, 171

  47. [55]

    Exciton-phonon interaction calls for a revision of the “exciton” concept.Phys

    Paleari, F.; Marini, A. Exciton-phonon interaction calls for a revision of the “exciton” concept.Phys. Rev. B2022,106, 125403

  48. [56]

    First-principles ultrafast exciton dynamics and time-domain spectroscopies: Dark-exciton mediated valley depolarization in monolayerWSe2.Phys

    Chen, H.-Y.; Sangalli, D.; Bernardi, M. First-principles ultrafast exciton dynamics and time-domain spectroscopies: Dark-exciton mediated valley depolarization in monolayerWSe2.Phys. Rev. Res.2022, 4, 043203

    2022

  49. [57]

    B.; Naik, M

    Chan, Y.-h.; Haber, J. B.; Naik, M. H.; Louie, S. G.; Neaton, J. B.; da Jornada, F. H.; Qiu, D. Y. Exciton thermalization dynamics in monolayerMoS2: A first-principles Boltzmann equation study.Phys. Rev. B2025,111, 184305

  50. [58]

    Theory of Line-Shapes of the Exciton Absorption Bands.Progress of Theoretical Physics 1958,20, 53–81

    Toyozawa, Y. Theory of Line-Shapes of the Exciton Absorption Bands.Progress of Theoretical Physics 1958,20, 53–81

    1958

  51. [59]

    Antonius, G.; Louie, S. G. Theory of exciton-phonon coupling.Phys. Rev. B2022,105, 085111

  52. [60]

    First-principles description of the exciton-phonon interaction: A cumulant approach.Phys

    Cudazzo, P. First-principles description of the exciton-phonon interaction: A cumulant approach.Phys. Rev. B2020,102, 045136

  53. [61]

    Exciton-Phonon Interaction and Relaxation Times from First Principles.Phys

    Chen, H.-Y.; Sangalli, D.; Bernardi, M. Exciton-Phonon Interaction and Relaxation Times from First Principles.Phys. Rev. Lett.2020,125, 107401

    2020

  54. [62]

    Lin, K.-Q. et al. Narrow-band high-lying excitons with negative-mass electrons in monolayer WSe2. Nature Communications2021,12, 5500

  55. [63]

    Deilmann, T.; Thygesen, K. S. Finite-momentum exciton landscape in mono- and bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides.2D Materials2019,6, 035003

  56. [64]

    Intervalley scattering in MoS2 imaged by two-photon photoemission with a high-harmonic probe.Applied Physics Letters2016,109, 162102

    Wallauer, R.; Reimann, J.; Armbrust, N.; Güdde, J.; Höfer, U. Intervalley scattering in MoS2 imaged by two-photon photoemission with a high-harmonic probe.Applied Physics Letters2016,109, 162102

  57. [65]

    W.; Xian, R

    Dong, S.; Puppin, M.; Pincelli, T.; Beaulieu, S.; Christiansen, D.; Hübener, H.; Nicholson, C. W.; Xian, R. P.; Dendzik, M.; Deng, Y.; others Direct measurement of key exciton properties: Energy, dynamics, and spatial distribution of the wave function.Natural Sciences2021, e10010

  58. [66]

    Momentum-resolved view of electron-phonon coupling in multilayer WSe 2.Physical Review Letters 2017,119, 036803

    Waldecker,L.; Bertoni,R.; Hübener,H.; Brumme,T.; Vasileiadis,T.; Zahn,D.; Rubio,A.; Ernstorfer,R. Momentum-resolved view of electron-phonon coupling in multilayer WSe 2.Physical Review Letters 2017,119, 036803

    2017

  59. [67]

    K.; Madéo, J.; Sahoo, C.; Xie, K.; Campbell, M.; Pareek, V.; Karmakar, A.; Wong, E

    Man, M. K.; Madéo, J.; Sahoo, C.; Xie, K.; Campbell, M.; Pareek, V.; Karmakar, A.; Wong, E. L.; Al- Mahboob, A.; Chan, N. S.; others Experimental measurement of the intrinsic excitonic wave function. Science Advances2021,7, eabg0192

  60. [68]

    Dong, S. et al. Direct measurement of key exciton properties: Energy, dynamics, and spatial distribution of the wave function.Natural Sciences2021,1, e10010 14

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.