Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 81 references

The paper claims that the bispectrum monopole gives an unbiased measurement of the BAO scale, that adding it to the power spectrum tightens constraints by about 30%, and that the difference between the two measurements can reveal the baryon

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:33 UTC pith:34IVQM6L

load-bearing objection The bispectrum-monopole BAO extraction is a genuinely useful and well-validated method; the relative-velocity 'diagnostic' is a plausible but unvalidated forecast that needs clearer framing and some numeric cleanup. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18384 v1 pith:34IVQM6L submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.CO

Bispectrum BAO and the baryon-dark matter relative velocity

Adriana Nadal-Matosas , H\'ector Gil-Mar\'in , Licia Verde This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords baryon acoustic oscillationsbispectrum monopolerelative velocity effectstreaming velocityBAO dilation parametergalaxy biasredshift-space distortionslarge-scale structure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish two things. First, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale can be extracted from the monopole of the galaxy bispectrum alone, using a template that suffers no bias and gives constraints comparable to the pre-reconstruction power spectrum; fitting it together with the power spectrum tightens the error on the BAO dilation parameter by roughly 30%. Second, the same three-point measurement, compared with the power spectrum, can detect the cosmological relative velocity between baryons and dark matter: the three bias parameters that describe this effect shift the recovered BAO scale differently in the two probes, up to 2% for b_v2 = ±0.05 and up to 20% for b_delta^bc ≤ −2. This matters because standard BAO analyses ignore this effect, so if it is present at even a low level it biases the distance scale; the bispectrum provides a way to see and remove that bias.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the redshift-space tree-level bispectrum, extended to include all relative-velocity terms (the b_v2, b_delta^bc, and b_theta^bc biases and their redshift-space counterparts), carries a BAO signal that can be isolated with a template-based fit to the monopole. The template writes the bispectrum in terms of power spectra and effective second-order kernels, with the BAO wiggle entering through P(k; alpha_iso). Validated on N-body simulations that do not include the streaming-velocity bias, the method returns alpha_iso unbiased and with precision comparable to the pre-reconstruction power spectrum; in combination with the power spectrum, the error shrinks by abo

What carries the argument

The central object is the redshift-space tree-level bispectrum monopole B^(0)(k1,k2,k3; alpha_iso), built from the linear and second-order kernels Z1 and Z2 that are extended to include the relative-velocity bias terms, paired with an isotropic BAO template in which each power-spectrum factor is split into a smooth broadband plus a damped BAO wiggle O_lin(k/alpha_iso). The relative-velocity terms enter through the transfer functions T_bc(k) and T_v(k), whose oscillations are phase-shifted relative to the BAO wiggle; that phase shift is what converts a real velocity bias into an alpha_iso shift, and it is the property that lets the power-spectrum and bispectrum measurements disagree in a diag

Load-bearing premise

The method's central bet is that the equations connecting galaxy clustering to the baryon–dark matter streaming velocity are correct; these equations were checked against simulations without that velocity, so a wrong phase or amplitude in the velocity terms would wipe out the predicted shifts and the claimed sensitivity to b_v2 and b_delta^bc.

What would settle it

Generate a suite of N-body simulations that physically include the baryon–dark matter relative velocity, or use a galaxy sample where streaming velocities are known to matter, then run the same power-spectrum and bispectrum BAO fits. If the bispectrum monopole does not show the model's predicted phase-shifted oscillations at BAO scales, or if the measured alpha_iso difference between the power spectrum and bispectrum does not track b_v2 and b_delta^bc as predicted, the velocity-bias model is wrong even though the BAO extraction itself might remain useful.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A BAO distance measurement can be obtained from the bispectrum monopole alone, with no reconstruction step and no bias, at precision comparable to the standard pre-reconstruction power spectrum.
  • Jointly fitting the power-spectrum monopole plus quadrupole and the bispectrum monopole improves the alpha_iso constraint by roughly 30% relative to the pre-reconstruction power spectrum.
  • A measured difference between alpha_iso from the power spectrum and from the bispectrum is a signature of relative-velocity bias; the expected size is about 2% for |b_v2| = 0.05 and up to 20% for b_delta^bc ≤ −2.
  • The b_theta^bc parameter is harder to isolate because it moves the power-spectrum and bispectrum measurements in the same direction, so velocity-divergence bias is the least constrained of the three.
  • Standard BAO pipelines that do not model streaming velocities can be biased at the roughly 1% level, comparable to the error budget of next-generation surveys; the bispectrum measurement offers a cross-check.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the velocity-bias model holds, the same power-spectrum versus bispectrum alpha_iso comparison is a generic null test for any mechanism that imprints phase-shifted oscillations on the BAO scale, not just streaming velocities—dark-matter oscillations and isocurvature perturbations would produce analogous discrepancies.
  • For surveys where post-reconstruction is unavailable or unreliable, the bispectrum monopole could nearly substitute for the information reconstruction provides, since the joint pre-reconstruction fit closes much of the gap to post-reconstruction precision.
  • The steep divergence of the bispectrum alpha_iso for negative b_delta^bc suggests that even a single BAO measurement on real data could act as a strong prior on this bias parameter, potentially sharpening full-shape analyses that currently constrain it only weakly.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same alpha_iso-difference diagnostic to the anisotropic dilation parameter once higher-order bispectrum multipoles become cheap to measure; the velocity terms should shift those measurements differently as well.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops and tests a method to extract the isotropic BAO dilation parameter alpha_iso from the monopole of the galaxy bispectrum, using a template-based model that embeds the linear BAO wiggle template in the P(k1)P(k2) prefactor. It extends the redshift-space tree-level bispectrum model to include the baryon-dark matter relative-velocity bias terms b_v2, b_delta_bc, and b_theta_bc. The BAO extraction is validated against Quijote N-body mocks: the bispectrum-monopole fit returns an unbiased alpha_iso with constraining power comparable to the pre-reconstruction power spectrum, and a joint P+B fit tightens the constraint. The paper then uses noiseless synthetic data generated from its own velocity-bias model to show that the relative-velocity terms shift the recovered alpha_iso differently for power spectrum and bispectrum, and argues that the P-B difference can be used to detect and constrain b_v2 and b_delta_bc.

Significance. If correct, the paper would establish the bispectrum monopole as a practical, unbiased BAO ruler and as a diagnostic for relative-velocity systematics in current and future surveys. The validation of the BAO extraction is a genuine strength: it uses 15000 Quijote realizations, reports fits to 500 independent realizations, shows residuals mostly within 3 sigma, and gives quantitative error estimates in Table 1. The updated redshift-space bispectrum model with all relative-velocity terms is also a useful theoretical contribution. However, the central detectability claim rests on a velocity-bias model that is not validated against N-body simulations containing streaming velocities; the synthetic forecasts are self-consistency checks rather than independent predictions. The quantitative claims also contain internal inconsistencies that must be resolved before the results can be used reliably.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3 and Section 4, Figs. 4-5] The predicted Delta_alpha_iso shifts and the proposed P-B detectability of b_v2 and b_delta_bc are generated by constructing noiseless synthetic data with the paper's own model (Eqs. 2.7-2.9 and Appendix A) and then fitting with the same model's velocity terms set to zero. The Quijote validation in Appendices B-C uses mocks without streaming velocity, so it validates only the BAO extraction technique, not the velocity kernels. If the Z1/Z2 velocity terms or their oscillatory phases are incorrect, the central detection claim collapses. This is a load-bearing issue: either validate the velocity-bias model against N-body simulations that include the baryon-dark matter relative velocity, or explicitly reframe the forecast as a model-level self-consistency check and soften the detection claim.
  2. [Abstract vs. Section 4] The abstract states that systematic discrepancies reach 'up to 20% for b_delta_bc <= -2'. Section 4, however, states that for b_delta_bc < -2 the bispectrum fit rapidly degrades, that a shift of 10% on alpha_iso is reached for b_delta_bc < -5, and that the model cannot capture the bispectrum shape for extreme values. The conclusion again says 'up to a 20% difference'. These numbers and the associated parameter ranges must be reconciled, and the claim should be quoted only in the regime where the model is under control.
  3. [Section 3.2, Appendix C, Table 1] The claimed improvement in constraining power is reported inconsistently: the abstract and Section 3.2 say ~30%, while Appendix C and Table 1 show an improvement from 2.80% to 2.17%, i.e. 22%. Additionally, Appendix C's statement that the post-reconstruction measurement is 'about 30% more than the joint analysis' is ambiguous. The authors should use a single, precisely defined metric (e.g., ratio of standard deviations or variances) and report consistent numbers throughout.
  4. [Section 4 and Figure 5] The 'prescription to detect and constrain' the velocity-bias parameters is based on polynomial/sigmoid fits to noiseless model points, with error bars from a 500 (h^-1Gpc)^3 volume. No actual likelihood or expected-constraint calculation is presented for realistic survey volumes; the text itself notes that for a DESI-like volume of ~50 (h^-1Gpc)^3 the b_theta_bc difference is hidden in the statistical error. The claims of 'high sensitivity' and 'competitive constraints' are therefore not quantitatively demonstrated and should be backed by a forecast, e.g., a Fisher or MCMC analysis on the P-B difference statistic.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/Conclusion] Typo in the conclusion: 'b δbv >= 2' should presumably be 'b_delta_bc'. Please also standardize notation between b_delta_bc/b_theta_bc and b_bc^delta/b_bc^theta.
  2. [Section 2.3] The description of the triangle ordering says the x-axis is sorted ascending by k3, then k2, then k1, but Appendix C says triangles are ordered by ascending k1. Please clarify the convention.
  3. [Figure 5] The central panel's error bars are stated to be invisible due to the plot scale. This makes it difficult to assess the claimed sensitivity; consider plotting residuals or a separate panel with zoomed range.
  4. [Appendix C caption] Typo: 'ower spectrum' should be 'power spectrum'. Also Table 1 label appears as 'T able 1'.
  5. [References] Reference [23] duplicates [18]. Also 'commoving' should be 'comoving' in the introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the bispectrum BAO extraction is validated against independent N-body mocks; velocity-bias forecasts are explicitly synthetic-model calculations.

full rationale

The paper's central methodological claim—that the bispectrum monopole can yield an unbiased alpha_iso—is tested against Quijote N-body mocks (Sec. 3.3, App. B, App. C), independent of the analytic model being used. The reported improvement in constraining power comes from MCMC fits to those mocks, not from self-referential construction. The relative-velocity part of the paper is clearly labeled as synthetic: Section 2.3 states it constructs 'ideal synthetic noiseless measurements (i.e. using the theory model of sec. 2 and app. A)'; the resulting Delta_alpha_iso shifts in Fig. 4 are therefore forecasts conditional on that model, not fits that are then re-predicted. The effective kernels F_eff/G_eff from the authors' prior work [69,70] are load-bearing for the bispectrum template, but they were calibrated to N-body simulations and are here further validated on Quijote mocks; this is independent support under the review rules. No equation reduces algebraically to its input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The internal numerical inconsistencies (22% vs 30% improvement; 10% vs 20% shift for b_deltabc) and the lack of N-body validation of the velocity terms are correctness risks, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced. The model rests on the standard bias/SPT/RSD framework and on the assumption that the late-time streaming-velocity signal is fully described by Eq. 2.1 with three bias parameters. Most free parameters are fitted to N-body in earlier papers (aF/aG) or marginalized as BAO nuisance parameters; the velocity-bias amplitudes are chosen from the literature and varied by hand.

free parameters (5)
  • b_v2 (relative velocity bias) = varied over [-0.05, 0.05]
    Coefficient of the v_bc^2 term in Eq. 2.1; the P-B discrepancy forecast is mapped as a function of this parameter.
  • b_delta_bc (relative density bias) = restricted post hoc to [-5, 5] (95% CI from Beutler et al. 2017)
    Forecast shifts for b_delta_bc <= -2 rely on extrapolating fits outside the validated range; the broad [-20, 20] range was declared unphysical.
  • b_theta_bc (relative velocity divergence bias) = varied over [-500, 500]
    Divergence bias coefficient; forecasts show little sensitivity for a DESI-like volume.
  • aF, aG effective kernel parameters = aF=[0.484,0.392,0.128,3.740,1.013,-0.722,-0.849,-0.575,-0.926]; aG=[3.599,-3.588,5.022,-3.879,0.336,-3.104,0.518,7.431,-
    18 parameters in F_eff/G_eff fitted to N-body simulations in [69,70]; fixed in this paper's bispectrum model.
  • BAO nuisance parameters = not reported individually
    B_p, beta, Sigma_parallel, Sigma_perp, A_p,i for P; B_b, Sigma_nl^B, beta_F, beta_G, beta_mu, C1, C2, A_b,i and FoG sigma's are marginalized in fits; needed for unbiased alpha_iso but not tabulated.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The relative velocity effect on galaxy clustering is fully captured by Eq. 2.1 with bias parameters b_v2, b_delta_bc, b_theta_bc and transfer functions T_bc, T_v.
    Basis for all velocity terms; adopted from [52-54,59] and not independently tested here.
  • domain assumption Redshift-space tree-level bispectrum and Kaiser/RSD/FoG model remains valid up to k ~ 0.3 h/Mpc for the chosen halo sample.
    B0 model is validated against Quijote without velocity bias; validity with velocity terms added is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The same linear BAO template O_lin(k/alpha_iso) used for the power spectrum can be embedded in P(k1)P(k2) to extract alpha_iso from the bispectrum monopole.
    Phenomenological model in Eqs. 3.6-3.7; not derived from first principles, but empirically validated in Appendix C for mocks without velocity bias.
  • standard math Local Lagrangian bias relation b_s2 = -4/7(b1-1) and standard SPT/TNS kernels describe the matter density and velocity fields.
    Used in the power spectrum model of Appendix A; standard assumptions in the field.
  • domain assumption Quijote FoF halos at z=0.5 with M ~ 2e13 h^-1 M_sun and nbar ~ 5.1e-5 (h/Mpc)^-3 represent DESI LRG clustering and provide a reliable covariance for 500 (h^-1 Gpc)^3.
    The validation of alpha_iso extraction relies on this mock ensemble and on the effective-volume rescaled covariance.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 24038 in / 18953 out tokens · 156995 ms · 2026-08-01T15:33:35.250495+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We evaluate the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) signal in the bispectrum as a tool to detect and characterize the relative velocity effect. We extend the existing framework by presenting an updated model for the redshift-space tree-level bispectrum that comprehensively incorporates all relative velocity terms. We introduce a novel, unbiased technique to extract the isotropic BAO dilation parameter ($\alpha_{\rm iso}$) solely from the bispectrum monopole. Validated against N-body simulations, this template-based extraction successfully recovers the acoustic scale and enhances the statistical constraining power by $\sim30\%$, when analyzed in tandem with the pre-reconstruction power spectrum, offering a powerful complement to standard post-reconstruction pipelines. We quantify how individual relative velocity components distort both two- and three-point statistics. We find that these effects induce distinct systematic shifts in the extracted $\alpha_{\rm iso}$ between the two probes. We find systematic discrepancies of up to $2\%$ for $b_{v^2}=\pm0.05$ and up to $20\%$ for $b_{\delta^{bc}}\le-2$. This differences demonstrate that a direct comparison of independent power spectrum and bispectrum BAO measurements can break parameter degeneracies and isolate the amplitude of these biases. Finally, we provide a concrete prescription to detect and constrain the three associated relative velocity bias parameters, showing that a joint analysis is highly sensitive to the $b_{v^2}$ and $b_{\delta^{bc}}$ amplitudes. This establishes the bispectrum BAO as a robust cosmological probe for current and next-generation galaxy surveys, serving both as a cross-check for standard analyses and a crucial diagnostic tool against systematic biases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 74 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Eisenstein, H

    D.J. Eisenstein, H. Seo and M. White,On the robustness of the acoustic scale in the low-redshift clustering of matter,The Astrophysical Journal664(2007) 660

    2007

  2. [2]

    Blake and K

    C. Blake and K. Glazebrook,Probing Dark Energy Using Baryonic Oscillations in the Galaxy Power Spectrum as a Cosmological Ruler, ApJ594(2003) 665 [astro-ph/0301632]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    Seo and D.J

    H.-J. Seo and D.J. Eisenstein,Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations from Future Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys, ApJ598(2003) 720 [astro-ph/0307460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    J.E. Bautista et al.,The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic correlation function between redshifts 0.6 and 1, MNRAS500(2020) 736 [2007.08993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Gil-Marín, J.E

    H. Gil-Marín, J.E. Bautista, R. Paviot, M. Vargas-Magaña, S. de la Torre, S. Fromenteau et al., The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0, MNRAS498(2020) 2492 [2007.08994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    DESI Collaboration et al.,DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.03000 [2404.03000]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Abdul Karim, J

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C. Allende Prieto et al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083515 [2503.14738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Scoccimarro, H.A

    R. Scoccimarro, H.A. Feldman, J.N. Fry and J.A. Frieman,The Bispectrum of IRAS Redshift Catalogs, ApJ546(2001) 652 [astro-ph/0004087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  9. [9]

    Gil-Marín, J

    H. Gil-Marín, J. Noreña, L. Verde, W.J. Percival, C. Wagner, M. Manera et al.,The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies - I. Bias and gravity, MNRAS451 (2015) 539 [1407.5668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Gil-Marín, L

    H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Noreña, A.J. Cuesta, L. Samushia, W.J. Percival et al.,The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies - II. Cosmological interpretation, MNRAS452(2015) 1914 [1408.0027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Gil-Marín, W.J

    H. Gil-Marín, W.J. Percival, L. Verde, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies, MNRAS 465(2017) 1757 [1606.00439]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Philcox and M.M

    O.H.E. Philcox and M.M. Ivanov,BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology:ΛCDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 043517 [2112.04515]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Ivanov, O.H.E

    M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, G. Cabass, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmology with the galaxy bispectrum multipoles: Optimal estimation and application to BOSS data, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083515 [2302.04414]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    D’Amico, Y

    G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,The BOSS bispectrum analysis at one loop from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 059 [2206.08327]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Novell-Masot, H

    S. Novell-Masot, H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey et al.,Full-Shape analysis of the power spectrum and bispectrum of DESI DR1 LRG and QSO samples, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 005 [2503.09714]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Novell-Masot, H

    S. Novell-Masot, H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi et al.,Cosmological – 23 – constraints from the DESI DR1 joint power spectrum and bispectrum analysis,arXiv e-prints (2026) arXiv:2603.19356 [2603.19356]

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Tseliakhovich and C

    D. Tseliakhovich and C. Hirata,Relative velocity of dark matter and baryonic fluids and the formation of the first structures, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 083520 [1005.2416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [19]

    J. Yoo, N. Dalal and U. Seljak,Supersonic relative velocity effect on the baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2011(2011) 018 [1105.3732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [20]

    Dalal, U.-L

    N. Dalal, U.-L. Pen and U. Seljak,Large-scale BAO signatures of the smallest galaxies, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2010(2010) 007 [1009.4704]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [21]

    Slepian and D.J

    Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,On the signature of the baryon-dark matter relative velocity in the two- and three-point galaxy correlation functions, MNRAS448(2015) 9 [1411.4052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [22]

    Blazek, J.E

    J.A. Blazek, J.E. McEwen and C.M. Hirata,Streaming Velocities and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Scale, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 121303 [1510.03554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [23]

    Tseliakhovich, R

    D. Tseliakhovich, R. Barkana and C.M. Hirata,Suppression and spatial variation of early galaxies and minihaloes, MNRAS418(2011) 906 [1012.2574]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [24]

    Visbal, R

    E. Visbal, R. Barkana, A. Fialkov, D. Tseliakhovich and C.M. Hirata,The signature of the first stars in atomic hydrogen at redshift 20, Nature487(2012) 70 [1201.1005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [25]

    C. Popa, S. Naoz, F. Marinacci and M. Vogelsberger,Gas-rich and gas-poor structures through the stream velocity effect, MNRAS460(2016) 1625 [1512.06862]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [26]

    Conaboy, I.T

    L. Conaboy, I.T. Iliev, A. Fialkov, K.L. Dixon and D. Sullivan,Relative baryon-dark matter velocities in cosmological zoom simulations, MNRAS525(2023) 5479 [2207.11614]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [27]

    Barron, D

    J. Barron, D. Curtin, H. Liu, J. Munoz and S. Roy,Constraining Dark Acoustic Oscillations with the High-Redshift UV Luminosity Function,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2512.01998 [2512.01998]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu and H.-B. Yu,Hidden charged dark matter, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2009(2009) 004 [0905.3039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [29]

    Kaplan, G.Z

    D.E. Kaplan, G.Z. Krnjaic, K.R. Rehermann and C.M. Wells,Atomic dark matter, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2010(2010) 021 [0909.0753]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [30]

    Cyr-Racine and K

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson,Cosmology of atomic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 103515 [1209.5752]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [31]

    Cyr-Racine, R

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, R. de Putter, A. Raccanelli and K. Sigurdson,Constraints on large-scale dark acoustic oscillations from cosmology, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 063517 [1310.3278]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [32]

    X. Chen, S. Hannestad and R.J. Scherrer,Cosmic microwave background and large scale structure limits on the interaction between dark matter and baryons,arXiv e-prints(2002) astro [astro-ph/0202496]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  32. [33]

    Boddy, V

    K.K. Boddy, V. Gluscevic, V. Poulin, E.D. Kovetz, M. Kamionkowski and R. Barkana,Critical assessment of CMB limits on dark matter-baryon scattering: New treatment of the relative bulk velocity, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 123506 [1808.00001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [34]

    Slatyer and C.-L

    T.R. Slatyer and C.-L. Wu,Early-Universe constraints on dark matter-baryon scattering and their implications for a global 21 cm signal, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 023013 [1803.09734]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [35]

    Boddy and V

    K.K. Boddy and V. Gluscevic,First cosmological constraint on the effective theory of dark matter-proton interactions, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083510 [1801.08609]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [36]

    Short, J.L

    K. Short, J.L. Bernal, K.K. Boddy, V. Gluscevic and L. Verde,Dark matter-baryon scattering effects on temperature perturbations and implications for cosmic dawn,arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2203.16524 [2203.16524]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [37]

    Chluba, J

    J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S.P. Patil,Features and new physical scales in primordial observables: Theory and observation,International Journal of Modern Physics D24(2015) 1530023 [1505.01834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [38]

    Slosar, X

    A. Slosar, X. Chen, C. Dvorkin, D. Meerburg, B. Wallisch, D. Green et al.,Scratches from the Past: Inflationary Archaeology through Features in the Power Spectrum of Primordial Fluctuations, BAAS51(2019) 98 [1903.09883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [39]

    Stahl, D

    C. Stahl, D. Werth and V. Poulin,Primordial sharp features through the nonlinear regime of structure formation, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 123514 [2502.02571]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Flauger, L

    R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal and G. Xu,Oscillations in the CMB from axion monodromy inflation, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2010(2010) 009 [0907.2916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [41]

    Schutz, E.I

    K. Schutz, E.I. Sfakianakis and D.I. Kaiser,Multifield inflation after Planck: Isocurvature modes from nonminimal couplings, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 064044 [1310.8285]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [42]

    Pineda and L.O

    F. Pineda and L.O. Pimentel,Isocurvature-induced features in multifield Higgs-R2 inflation, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 103541 [2512.14455]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [43]

    Heinrich and M

    C. Heinrich and M. Schmittfull,BAO modulation as a probe of compensated isocurvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063503 [1904.00024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [44]

    Akrami, F

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, A&A641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [45]

    Stacy, V

    A. Stacy, V. Bromm and A. Loeb,Effect of Streaming Motion of Baryons Relative to Dark Matter on the Formation of the First Stars, ApJ730(2011) L1 [1011.4512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [46]

    Maio, L.V.E

    U. Maio, L.V.E. Koopmans and B. Ciardi,The impact of primordial supersonic flows on early structure formation, reionization and the lowest-mass dwarf galaxies, MNRAS412(2011) L40 [1011.4006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [47]

    O’Leary and M

    R.M. O’Leary and M. McQuinn,The Formation of the First Cosmic Structures and the Physics of the z~20 Universe, ApJ760(2012) 4 [1204.1344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [48]

    Fialkov, R

    A. Fialkov, R. Barkana, D. Tseliakhovich and C.M. Hirata,Impact of the relative motion between the dark matter and baryons on the first stars: semi-analytical modelling, MNRAS424 (2012) 1335 [1110.2111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  48. [49]

    S. Naoz, N. Yoshida and N.Y. Gnedin,Simulations of Early Baryonic Structure Formation with Stream Velocity. II. The Gas Fraction, ApJ763(2013) 27 [1207.5515]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [50]

    Richardson, E

    M.L.A. Richardson, E. Scannapieco and R.J. Thacker,Hybrid Cosmological Simulations with Stream Velocities, ApJ771(2013) 81 [1305.3276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [51]

    Asaba, K

    S. Asaba, K. Ichiki and H. Tashiro,Effect of supersonic relative motion between baryons and dark matter on collapsed objects, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 023518 [1508.07719]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [52]

    Yoo and U

    J. Yoo and U. Seljak,Signatures of first stars in galaxy surveys: Multitracer analysis of the supersonic relative velocity effect and the constraints from the BOSS power spectrum measurements, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 103520 [1308.1401]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [53]

    Slepian, D.J

    Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, J.A. Blazek, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, H. Gil-Marín et al., Constraining the baryon-dark matter relative velocity with the large-scale three-point correlation function of the SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS474(2018) 2109 [1607.06098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [54]

    Beutler, U

    F. Beutler, U. Seljak and Z. Vlah,Constraining the relative velocity effect using the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, MNRAS470(2017) 2723 [1612.04720]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [55]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram,The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (class). part ii: Approximation schemes,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011(2011) 034

    2011

  55. [56]

    McDonald and A

    P. McDonald and A. Roy,Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2009(2009) 020 [0902.0991]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  56. [57]

    Taruya, T

    A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi and S. Saito,Baryon acoustic oscillations in 2D: Modeling redshift-space power spectrum from perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 063522 [1006.0699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [58]

    Saito, T

    S. Saito, T. Baldauf, Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, T. Okumura and P. McDonald,Understanding higher-order nonlocal halo bias at large scales by combining the power spectrum with the bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 123522 [1405.1447]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [59]

    Schmidt,Effect of relative velocity and density perturbations between baryons and dark matter on the clustering of galaxies, Phys

    F. Schmidt,Effect of relative velocity and density perturbations between baryons and dark matter on the clustering of galaxies, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 063508 [1602.09059]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [60]

    Scoccimarro, H.M.P

    R. Scoccimarro, H.M.P. Couchman and J.A. Frieman,The Bispectrum as a Signature of Gravitational Instability in Redshift Space, ApJ517(1999) 531 [astro-ph/9808305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  60. [61]

    cosmological parameters,A&A641(2020) A6

    Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results - vi. cosmological parameters,A&A641(2020) A6

    2018

  61. [62]

    Beutler, S

    F. Beutler, S. Saito, H.-J. Seo, J. Brinkmann, K.S. Dawson, D.J. Eisenstein et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: testing gravity with redshift space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles, MNRAS443(2014) 1065 [1312.4611]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [63]

    Alcock and B

    C. Alcock and B. Paczynski,An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant, Nature 281(1979) 358

    1979

  63. [64]

    Gagrani and L

    P. Gagrani and L. Samushia,Information Content of the Angular Multipoles of Redshift-Space Galaxy Bispectrum, MNRAS467(2017) 928 [1610.03488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [65]

    Pearson and L

    D.W. Pearson and L. Samushia,A Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation features in the SDSS BOSS DR12 Galaxy Bispectrum, MNRAS478(2018) 4500 [1712.04970]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [66]

    Child, Z

    H.L. Child, Z. Slepian and M. Takada,A Physical Picture of Bispectrum Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Interferometric Basis,arXiv e-prints(2018) arXiv:1811.12396 [1811.12396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [67]

    Child, M

    H.L. Child, M. Takada, T. Nishimichi, T. Sunayama, Z. Slepian, S. Habib et al.,Bispectrum as baryon acoustic oscillation interferometer, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 123521 [1806.11147]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [68]

    Behera, M

    J. Behera, M. Rezaie, L. Samushia and J. Ereza,Modelling the BAO feature in bispectrum, MNRAS531(2024) 3326 [2312.05942]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [69]

    Gil-Marín, C

    H. Gil-Marín, C. Wagner, F. Fragkoudi, R. Jimenez and L. Verde,An improved fitting formula for the dark matter bispectrum, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2012(2012) 047 [1111.4477]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [70]

    Gil-Marín, C

    H. Gil-Marín, C. Wagner, J. Noreña, L. Verde and W. Percival,Dark matter and halo bispectrum in redshift space: theory and applications, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2014 (2014) 029 [1407.1836]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [71]

    Villaescusa-Navarro et al.,The Quijote Simulations, ApJS250(2020) 2 [1909.05273]

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro et al.,The Quijote Simulations, ApJS250(2020) 2 [1909.05273]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [72]

    C.P. Ahn, R. Alexandroff, C. Allende Prieto, S.F. Anderson, T. Anderton, B.H. Andrews et al., The Ninth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, ApJS203(2012) 21 [1207.7137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [73]

    White, M

    M. White, M. Blanton, A. Bolton, D. Schlegel, J. Tinker, A. Berlind et al.,The Clustering of Massive Galaxies at z~0.5 from the First Semester of BOSS Data, ApJ728(2011) 126 [1010.4915]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [74]

    Anderson, E

    L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, A.S. Bolton et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic – 26 – oscillations in the Data Release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample, MNRAS427(2012) 3435 [1203.6594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  74. [75]

    Slepian, D.J

    Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, F. Beutler, C.-H. Chuang, A.J. Cuesta, J. Ge et al.,The large-scale three-point correlation function of the SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS468 (2017) 1070 [1512.02231]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [76]

    K.C. Chan, R. Scoccimarro and R.K. Sheth,Gravity and large-scale nonlocal bias, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 083509 [1201.3614]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [77]

    Baldauf, U

    T. Baldauf, U. Seljak, V. Desjacques and P. McDonald,Evidence for quadratic tidal tensor bias from the halo bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 083540 [1201.4827]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  77. [78]

    Nishimichi and A

    T. Nishimichi and A. Taruya,Baryon acoustic oscillations in 2D. II. Redshift-space halo clustering in N-body simulations, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 043526 [1106.4562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  78. [79]

    Peebles and E.J

    P.J.E. Peebles and E.J. Groth,Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. V. Three-point correlation function for the galaxy distribution in the Zwicky catalog., ApJ196 (1975) 1

    1975

  79. [80]

    Catelan and L

    P. Catelan and L. Moscardini,Kurtosis as a Non-Gaussian Signature of the Large-Scale Velocity Field, ApJ436(1994) 5 [astro-ph/9403035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  80. [81]

    Verde, A.F

    L. Verde, A.F. Heavens, S. Matarrese and L. Moscardini,Large-scale bias in the Universe - II. Redshift-space bispectrum, MNRAS300(1998) 747 [astro-ph/9806028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

Showing first 80 references.