Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 291 references

A new model attributes JWST's bright high-redshift galaxies to bursty star formation in top-heavy, dense clouds.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 14:04 UTC pith:ILPFFYMS

load-bearing objection A genuinely new cloud-scale SAM framework with public code, worth refereeing, but the IMF-SFE coupling has a factor-of-epsilon bug and the 'required' claim outruns the evidence. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18868 v1 pith:ILPFFYMS submitted 2026-07-21 astro-ph.GA

Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn: A Cloud-Scale Star Formation Model Unifying Variable SFE, IMFs, and Stochasticity

Elie Cueto , Anne Hutter This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies: high-redshiftstar formationinitial mass functionstar formation efficiencyultraviolet luminosity functioncosmic dawnbursty star formationsemi-analytic models
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to show that the unexpectedly large number of UV-bright galaxies JWST finds at z>10 has a mundane explanation: star formation in early galaxies is quantised into bursts within dense, massive clouds. It proposes a new model that tracks individual clouds, letting the cloud's mass, density, and metallicity set both how many stars it makes and the stellar initial mass function. A top-heavy IMF and enhanced star formation efficiency in massive clouds amplify bursts, and the model argues that this short-term stochasticity is required to match the observed UV luminosity functions. If correct, no exotic cosmology is needed to explain cosmic dawn's bright galaxies.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the abundance of bright galaxies at z≃7–13 is controlled by parsec-scale physics rather than galaxy-scale or cosmological parameters. The model couples a dynamic IMF that becomes top-heavy at low metallicity and high redshift with an SFE that rises with cloud mass and density but is suppressed by top-heaviness through feedback. This coupling produces three star-formation regimes – feedback-limited in low-mass halos, cloud-mass-limited in intermediate halos, and continuous in massive halos – and, critically, it generates strong UV luminosity scatter. The model matches the bright end of the UV luminosity function only when this short-term

What carries the argument

The central object is the discrete star-forming cloud: at each timestep the model draws clouds from a scale-free cloud mass function, gives each a mass-dependent density and an SFE set by whichever feedback process dominates (photoionisation or radiation pressure), and assigns a dynamic IMF whose high-mass content is limited by the cloud's finite stellar mass. The coupled SFE-IMF relation - a linear correction to the radiation-pressure SFE that makes efficiency fall as the IMF becomes more top-heavy - is what converts cloud-scale physics into galaxy-scale burstiness. The machinery's work is to quantise star formation into stochastic events whose luminosity scatter lifts galaxies into the bri

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on one measured gradient – that star formation efficiency drops by 1/30 per unit change in the UV-to-mass ratio – being universal across all cloud conditions, so that a linear extrapolation of the IMF–SFE coupling drives the bright-end boost.

What would settle it

A robust measurement of dε★/dΨ_UV at a cloud mass of 10^8 Msun or at solar metallicity that disagrees with the linear −1/30 relation would invalidate the extrapolation, as would a JWST observation showing that UV scatter at fixed halo mass is far below the model's predicted ~2–3 magnitudes.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Matched to JWST data, the model implies that star formation at z≳10 is strongly bursty, with galaxies in low-mass halos alternating between bright starbursts and long quiescent phases.
  • The bright end of the UV luminosity function is a direct tracer of the IMF and of the maximum cloud mass; a lower maximum cloud mass truncates the bright end.
  • If the IMF becomes top-heavy in low-metallicity, high-redshift clouds, the same physics also produces the high N/O ratios seen in some JWST galaxies.
  • The model predicts a characteristic scatter in UV magnitudes at fixed halo mass, which can be compared with deep imaging to test the bursty scenario.
  • Short-term stochastic variability is an essential ingredient: smoothing it out removes the bright-end excess, so any successful model of cosmic dawn must include time-resolved star formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The load-bearing slope that couples SFE to the IMF is extrapolated from a single local calibration; if that slope is not universal across cloud masses, densities, and metallicities, the ranking of IMF vs SFE effects on the luminosity function could change.
  • By ignoring galaxy mergers and time-dependent global SFE caps, the model likely places a conservative lower limit on burstiness; including them would probably make the bright end even more pronounced.
  • The same cloud-based machinery could be extended to predict spatially resolved star-forming clumps and their ages, offering a direct observational test against JWST's resolved cluster populations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a new semi-analytic, cloud-based star formation model intended for high-redshift galaxies (z about 5 to 13). Instead of treating star formation as smooth and galaxy-averaged, the model draws discrete molecular clouds from a mass function, assigns each cloud a density, a star formation efficiency (SFE) regulated by photoionisation or radiation pressure, and an IMF that can depend on cloud mass, metallicity, and redshift. The model is embedded in analytic halo growth histories with gas accretion, supernova feedback, chemical enrichment, and dust attenuation. The authors identify three star formation regimes — feedback-dominated, cloud-mass-limited, and continuous — and compare the UV luminosity functions (LFs) at z = 7, 10, and 13 with JWST and pre-JWST data. Their central claim is that cloud-scale physics, particularly top-heavy dynamic IMFs and cloud-property-dependent SFE, boosts star formation burstiness and the bright end of the UV LF, and that short-term stochastic variability is required to match the observed abundance of bright galaxies at Cosmic Dawn. The code is publicly available.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a useful and timely contribution: it offers a physically motivated, cloud-scale explanation for the JWST bright-galaxy excess without invoking exotic cosmology, and it makes concrete predictions for UV luminosity scatter, burst/quiescent duty cycles, and LF shapes. The framework is original in combining stochastic cloud sampling with a dynamical IMF and an SFE–IMF coupling, and the public code is a strength. However, the quantitative conclusions depend on a few load-bearing technical choices. The internal inconsistency in the Taylor expansion of the IMF–SFE coupling (Section 2.5.2) and the redshift weighting of the halo mass function (Section 2.10) affect the quantitative LF predictions, so the results cannot be fully assessed until these are corrected or robustly justified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.5.2, Eqs. (24)–(29)] There is an internal inconsistency in the implementation of the Menon et al. (2024) slope. The text after Eq. (24) states that the sensitivity applies per unit change in chi, i.e. d(epsilon)/d(chi) = -1/30. But Eq. (26) implements epsilon(chi) = epsilon_0 * [1 - (chi-1)/30], whose derivative at chi=1 is -epsilon_0/30, not -1/30. With the stated slope, the correct first-order expansion is epsilon(chi) = epsilon_0 - (chi-1)/30, unless the intended slope is logarithmic, in which case Eq. (24) should read d ln(epsilon)/d(chi) = -1/30. The same factor epsilon_0 propagates into Eqs. (28)–(29). Since epsilon_0 ranges roughly 0.1–0.8 for the clouds in Fig. 1, the IMF-induced SFE suppression is weaker by a factor of 2–10 than the text claims. Because Section 4 identifies the IMF variant as the strongest driver of the UV LF, this error affects the quantitative LF comparison and the conclusion that
  2. [Section 2.5.2, Eq. (24), and Section 4] The IMF–SFE coupling is calibrated from a single RHD simulation point (M0 = 10^6 solar masses, Z = 10^-2 solar metallicity, Sigma0 = 3 x 10^3 solar masses per pc^2) and then linearly extrapolated to all cloud masses, densities, metallicities, and IMF variants, with Xi proportional to Psi_UV assumed. The paper acknowledges that this is locally calibrated and reliable only for modest chi deviations, but the IMF variant is the model ingredient that most strongly changes the UV LF. It would be helpful to present a sensitivity study (e.g., varying the slope by a factor of 2–3, or using a logarithmic rather than a linear dependence) to show whether the ranking of IMF versus SFE versus cloud-mass effects, and the resulting bright-end LF, is robust. As it stands, the headline result is not yet demonstrated to be insensitive to this extrapolation.
  3. [Section 2.10 and Fig. 7] The UV LF comparisons at z = 7, 10, and 13 are produced by weighting each simulated galaxy trajectory by the halo mass function evaluated at the trajectory's z = 4.5 halo mass. These are not equal to the weights that would make the trajectory population representative at the output redshift. A halo of a given mass at z = 7 has a different z = 4.5 descendant mass, and the relative abundance of low-mass versus high-mass systems evolves with redshift. Since the bright-end enhancement in Fig. 7 is driven by low-mass halos scattering upward and high-mass halos populating the bright bins, using a single z = 4.5 HMF weight could bias both the normalization and the shape of the predicted LFs. Please reweight by the HMF at each output redshift, or explain and test why the z = 4.5 weighting is equivalent for z = 5–13.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.5.2, Eq. (24)] Psi_UV and its fiducial value Psi_UV,0 are not defined with units. Since the slope d(epsilon)/d(Psi_UV) is a dimensional quantity, please state the definitions explicitly.
  2. [Section 2.2.1, Eq. (9)] The term M_vir/10^4 in the maximum cloud mass expression has implicit units. Please write the expression with explicit units or define the dimensionless ratio being used.
  3. [Section 2.5.4, page 6] Typo: 'leading to a an SFE difference' should be 'leading to an SFE difference'.
  4. [Section 5, page 15] Typo: 'our could-based star formation model' should be 'our cloud-based star formation model'.
  5. [Section 4, Fig. 7] The statement that one model 'falls below the observational data' is qualitative. A quantitative residual or goodness-of-fit measure (especially at the bright end) would strengthen the comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the UV LF predictions are forward outputs of a model calibrated to external RHD simulations, not fits to the target LF data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense prohibited here. The cloud-scale SFE and IMF–SFE coupling are adopted from external radiation-hydrodynamic calibrations (Kim et al. 2018; Menon et al. 2024), and the UV luminosity functions at z = 7–13 are forward predictions after fixing the model parameters; the paper does not fit its parameters to the observed LFs it compares against. The central claim that short-term stochastic variability is required to match bright galaxies is supported by a controlled model comparison (Fiducial vs. Smooth SF), not by construction: Smooth SF removes stochastic cloud sampling and the bright end drops, while the fiducial stochastic model matches better. Self-citations to Cueto et al. (2024) and Hutter et al. (2025) supply the adopted IMF and feedback recipes as explicit inputs, but the headline result is a sensitivity analysis over model variants, so the self-citations are not load-bearing in the sense of forcing the conclusion. The manuscript also contains an internal derivative inconsistency in Eq. (26): the stated input d eps_star/d Psi_UV ~ -1/30 is implemented as d eps/d chi = -eps0/30, i.e., multiplied by an extra eps0 factor. This is a calibration/correctness concern that could affect the relative ranking of IMF versus SFE effects, but it is not a circular reduction — the slope is an external fitted input, and the prediction is not equivalent to that input by construction. Similarly, the acknowledged local calibration and extrapolation of the Menon et al. (2024) slope (§2.5.2) is a limitation, not circularity. Overall, the paper's main chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no demonstrated circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced. The 'clouds' are empirically motivated objects, and the 'smooth star-formation mode' and 'cloud-mass-limited IMF' are algorithmic choices, not new physical postulates. The model's freedom is concentrated in the free parameters listed above, most of which are calibrated to ranges rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (9)
  • n_s = 5×10^5
    Dimensionless calibration factor in Eq. (10) mapping the ambient virial gas density to the cloud volume density n0; chosen so most cloud densities fall within the adopted [10^3,10^5] cm^-3 range.
  • f_max = 12
    Calibration factor in Eq. (9) that sets the Jeans-like upper bound on cloud mass relative to halo mass and redshift.
  • M_max_cl = 10^8 Msun (fiducial; 10^7 in Cloud variant)
    Global hard cap on cloud mass; directly controls the bright end of the LF.
  • T_smooth = 0.006
    Threshold in Eq. (13) for switching from stochastic cloud sampling to the averaged 'smooth' star-formation mode at high gas mass.
  • f★
    Free normalization of the galaxy-wide maximum SFE (Eq. 35); sets when massive halos saturate star formation.
  • f_w
    Fraction of SN energy coupled to gas, used in the ejection-limited SN efficiency (Eq. 34).
  • epsilon_ej,turb = 0.13
    Prompt turbulent gas-loss fraction adopted from Raskutti et al. (2016); enters both the photoionisation and radiation-pressure SFE models.
  • a = 2.3
    Sharpness of the smooth transition between photoionisation-limited and radiation-pressure-limited SFE (Eq. 31).
  • dSFE/dPsi_UV slope = -1/30 per unit chi
    Constant slope of SFE versus ionising output (Eq. 24), measured locally by Menon et al. (2024) at one cloud property point and linearly extrapolated to all clouds (Eq. 26).
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Baryons trace dark matter, so gas accretion follows the cosmic baryon fraction (Eq. 2)
    Assumes smooth cosmological accretion with no recycling or merger-driven gas flows; used throughout the model.
  • domain assumption Halo growth follows the analytic Correa et al. (2015) mass-assembly formula with beta in [-0.95,-0.55] (Eq. 1)
    Replaces full merger trees; no stochastic accretion or mergers. The authors acknowledge this limitation in §5.
  • domain assumption Star formation occurs only in discrete self-gravitating clouds drawn from a scale-free CMF with alpha=2 between M_min=10^4 Msun and a Jeans-scaled upper bound (Eqs. 8-9)
    The quantization of star formation into clouds is the paper's core premise, motivated by observations and simulations but not derived here.
  • domain assumption The cloud SFE is set by a photoionisation-to-radiation-pressure balance with a smooth v_esc/c_i transition (Eqs. 15-31)
    The two-regime SFE model and its calibration are adopted from Kim et al. (2018) and parameterised further in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The IMF–SFE coupling is linear with slope -1/30 per unit normalized ionising photon yield (Eqs. 24-26)
    A single local slope from Menon et al. (2024) is extrapolated globally; the paper notes the correction is only reliable for modest deviations from chi=1.
  • standard math Starburst99 SPS spectra fitted by piecewise power laws (Appendix A) provide the UV and ionising outputs
    The fitting functions are the model's rendering of a standard stellar-population synthesis tool.
  • domain assumption Dust and gas are uniformly mixed in a slab geometry with a fixed dust radius law (Eqs. 38-39)
    Attenuation model from Hutter et al. (2023); affects the normalization of the predicted UV LF.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 32305 in / 14560 out tokens · 128811 ms · 2026-08-01T14:04:48.854610+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

To investigate the origins of the high abundance of UV-bright galaxies at z > 10, we present a new semi-analytic model that bridges the gap between small-scale star formation physics and large-scale galaxy evolution by explicitly tracking discrete star-forming clouds within smoothly evolving dark matter potentials. Unlike conventional semi-analytic models, our approach naturally captures the stochasticity of star formation, allowing us to isolate how cloud properties, star formation efficiencies (SFEs), and stellar initial mass functions (IMFs) shape the star-formation burstiness of early galaxies. Clouds are drawn sequentially from a cloud mass distribution, assigned an SFE and IMF depending on cloud mass, metallicity, and redshift, and evolve under the influence of short-timescale stellar feedback. We identify three distinct star formation regimes arising from the interplay between cloud masses, densities, and feedback timescales: a stochastic, feedback-limited regime in low-mass halos with long quiescent phases; a bursty regime regulated by the cloud mass distribution; and a smooth, continuous regime in massive halos. Our fiducial model adopts a dynamic IMF, an SFE linked to cloud properties and the IMF, and massive, moderately dense clouds. Varying assumptions reveals that top-heavy IMFs and enhanced SFEs in massive clouds amplify burstiness, while altering the upper cloud mass or density normalisation is secondary. Among model ingredients, the IMF most strongly impacts the UV luminosity function (LF), while switching to a constant SFE boosts the faint end, and reducing the maximum cloud mass decreases the bright end. These results demonstrate that cloud-scale physics critically shape early galaxy UV luminosity distributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18868 by Anne Hutter, Elie Cueto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Star formation efficiency as a function of 𝑀cl and 𝑓massive with the Cloud Mass Limited evolving IMF. Left: 𝜖★ with 𝑍 = 0.1𝑍⊙ and 𝑛0 = 104 cm−3 . Contours show lines of constant SFE. Right: Difference in SFE from the left panel for smaller and larger (left and right columns) metallicity and density (top and bottom rows). Contours show the SFE for these values of 𝑍 and 𝑛0. The bottom of each panel, with 𝑓ma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Median duration of starbursts as a function of halo mass and redshift for the Fiducial model. Right: Fractional change in median starburst duration between the Fiducial model and the four variation models, 𝑡sb/𝑡sb,Fiducial. 18 15 12 9 6 Redshift 8 9 10 11 l o g 1 0 Mvir = M ¯ Fiducial 0 5 10 15 20 25 tq [Myr] 8 9 10 11 Cloud IMF 18 15 12 9 6 8 9 10 11 SFE 18 15 12 9 6 Density 1 2 3 tq=tq; Fiducial Re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Median duration of quiescent periods as a function of halo mass and redshift for the Fiducial model. Right: Fractional change in median quiescent duration between the Fiducial model and the four variation models, 𝑡q/𝑡q,Fiducial. identify three distinct evolutionary regimes across the halo mass - redshift space: (1) Feedback-dominated regime (𝑀vir ≲ 108.5 M⊙): Because 𝑡form > 𝑡SN, individual starburst… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Wavelet power spectra of SFR, summed over all galaxies in the models, weighted by the halo mass function. Left: The fiducial model, for all halos (top), and for halos during time steps when their halo masses are 𝑀vir < 109M⊙ (bottom left), 109M⊙ ≤ 𝑀vir < 1010M⊙ (bottom center), and 1010M⊙ ≤ 𝑀vir ≤ 1011M⊙ (bottom right). Right: All galaxies in each of the variation models. Note that the vertical feature aro… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The star formation history and UV luminosity of a halo in the fiducial model. both the cloud onset delay (𝑡sf,0) and the active star-forming window (𝑡sf), which accelerates the entire star-formation cycle. The variability of the SFH directly reflects the physical “clock” gov￾erning cloud assembly, gas consumption, and feedback disruption. While the Fiducial model features a smooth gradient of timescales th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: 1𝜎 scatter in luminosity as a function of redshift and halo mass. Contours show median luminosities. Right: Difference in luminosity scatter between the variation models and the Fiducial model, so blue signifies the model has greater scatter in luminosity than the Fiducial model, and vice versa for red. changes the UV scatter (Δ𝜎𝑀UV ) relative to the Fiducial model, highlighting how cloud-scale physi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: UV luminosity functions at 𝑧 = 7, 10, and 13, for our five model variations as well as a Smooth SF model. Dashed lines show intrinsic UV LFs, while solid and dash-dotted lines show dust attenuated UVLFs. Light gray points show pre-JWST observational results from (Atek et al. 2015; Bouwens et al. 2015, 2016, 2021; Calvi et al. 2016; Finkelstein et al. 2015; Ishigaki et al. 2018; Livermore et al. 2017; McLur… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

291 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Chemical Evolution of the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/180 , archivePrefix =. 1210.3968 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    N-enhancement in GN-z11: First evidence for supermassive stars nucleosynthesis in proto-globular clusters-like conditions at high redshift?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346410 , archivePrefix =. 2303.07955 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational Fragmentation in Turbulent Primordial Gas and the Initial Mass Function of Population III Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/110 , archivePrefix =. 1006.1508 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    JADES: The star-formation and chemical enrichment history of a luminous galaxy at z -0.5ex 9.43 probed by ultra-deep JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.02575 , archivePrefix =. 2407.02575 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.02575

  5. [5]

    Grids of stellar models with rotation. VI. Models from 0.8 to 120 M _ at a metallicity Z = 0.006. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141222 , archivePrefix =. 2201.12262 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    Massive star modelling and nucleosynthesis. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.617765 , adsurl =

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    2024 , eprint=

    New Ionization Models and the Shocking Nitrogen Excess at z > 5 , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Impacts of stellar wind and supernovae on star cluster formation: Origins of extremely high N/O ratios and multiple stellar populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psae074 , archivePrefix =. 2404.10535 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Massive star evolution: rotation, winds, and overshooting vectors in the mass-luminosity plane. I. A calibrated grid of rotating single star models. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834123 , archivePrefix =. 1811.12190 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Stellar wind yields of very massive stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2537 , archivePrefix =. 2308.10941 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    JWST Identification of Extremely Low C/N Galaxies with [N/O] 0.5 at z 6-10 Evidencing the Early CNO-cycle Enrichment and a Connection with Globular Cluster Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be , archivePrefix =. 2307.00710 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    GA-NIFS: An extremely nitrogen-loud and chemically stratified galaxy at $z\sim 5.55$

    GA-NIFS: An extremely nitrogen-loud and chemically stratified galaxy at z 5.55. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.04148 , archivePrefix =. 2404.04148 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.04148

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Rapid Chemical Enrichment by Intermittent Star Formation in GN-z11. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1 , archivePrefix =. 2308.15583 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Presupernova Evolution and Explosive Nucleosynthesis of Rotating Massive Stars in the Metallicity Range -3 [Fe/H] 0. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aacb24 , archivePrefix =. 1805.09640 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Extreme N-emitters at high redshift: Possible signatures of supermassive stars and globular cluster or black hole formation in action. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347411 , archivePrefix =. 2307.04234 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Multiple Channels for Nitrogen Pollution by Metal-enriched Supermassive Stars and Implications for GN-z11. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd550 , archivePrefix =. 2304.05013 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  17. [17]

    Low [O/Fe] Ratio in a Luminous Galaxy at the Early Cosmic Epoch ($z>10$): Signature of Short Delay Time or Bright Hypernovae/Pair-Instability Supernovae?

    Low [O/Fe] Ratio in a Luminous Galaxy at the Early Cosmic Epoch ( z>10 ): Signature of Short Delay Time or Bright Hypernovae/Pair-Instability Supernovae?. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.14470 , archivePrefix =. 2407.14470 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.14470

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Fast-rotating massive Population III stars as possible sources of extreme N enrichment in high-redshift galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348866 , archivePrefix =. 2405.11235 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    High N/O ratio at high redshift as a result of a strong burst of star formation and differential galactic winds. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453275 , archivePrefix =. 2412.05363 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    GN-z11 in Context: Possible Signatures of Globular Cluster Precursors at Redshift 10. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e , adsurl =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Building up the Population III initial mass function from cosmological initial conditions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1728 , archivePrefix =. 1603.09475 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    2024 , eprint=

    What can we learn from the Nitrogen abundance of High-z galaxies? , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  23. [23]

    Stellar Yields of Rotating First Stars. II. Pair-instability Supernovae and Comparison with Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab95f , archivePrefix =. 1803.06630 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Rapidly rotating Population III stellar models as a source of primary nitrogen. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449156 , archivePrefix =. 2404.16512 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Deep Rest-UV JWST/NIRSpec Spectroscopy of Early Galaxies: The Demographics of C IV and N-emitters in the Reionization Era. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada95c , archivePrefix =. 2407.19009 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Very massive stars and nitrogen-emitting galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347827 , archivePrefix =. 2310.10725 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    A Study of Primordial Very Massive Star Evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acac91 , archivePrefix =. 2212.09629 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    EMPRESS. XIII. Chemical Enrichment of Young Galaxies Near and Far at z 0 and 4 10: Fe/O, Ar/O, S/O, and N/O Measurements with a Comparison of Chemical Evolution Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad13ff , archivePrefix =. 2305.02078 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    EAS2024 , year = 2024, month = jul, eid =

    Puzzlingly High N/O and N/C Galaxies at z 6-10: Any Mechanisms for Insufficient C and O Enrichments. EAS2024 , year = 2024, month = jul, eid =

    2024

  30. [30]

    Models from 1.7 to 500 M _ at metallicity Z = 10 ^ ‑5

    Grids of stellar models with rotation: VIII. Models from 1.7 to 500 M _ at metallicity Z = 10 ^ ‑5. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450180 , archivePrefix =. 2407.06739 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    A stochastically sampled IMF alters the stellar content of simulated dwarf galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3331 , archivePrefix =. 1811.00022 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Calibrated, cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with variable IMFs I: method and effect on global galaxy scaling relations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1826 , archivePrefix =. 1804.09079 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Protostars and Planets V , year = 2007, editor =

    The Origin of the Initial Mass Function. Protostars and Planets V , year = 2007, editor =

    2007

  34. [34]

    Mass-size and mass- distributions of early-type galaxies: bulge fraction drives kinematics, mass-to-light ratio, molecular gas fraction and stellar initial mass function

    The ATLAS ^ 3D project - XX. Mass-size and mass- distributions of early-type galaxies: bulge fraction drives kinematics, mass-to-light ratio, molecular gas fraction and stellar initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt644 , archivePrefix =. 1208.3523 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Transition of the initial mass function in the metal-poor environments. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2497 , archivePrefix =. 2103.04997 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Chemoarchaeological downsizing in a hierarchical universe: impact of a top-heavy IGIMF. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2272 , archivePrefix =. 1402.3296 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Chemodynamics of a simulated disc galaxy: initial mass functions and Type Ia supernova progenitors. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1709 , archivePrefix =. 1408.5135 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Mapping the core mass function to the initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv872 , archivePrefix =. 1411.2979 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    The necessity of feedback physics in setting the peak of the initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw315 , archivePrefix =. 1510.05040 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Protostellar feedback in turbulent fragmentation: consequences for stellar clustering and multiplicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx725 , archivePrefix =. 1610.00772 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Universal scaling relations in scale-free structure formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty920 , archivePrefix =. 1707.05799 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Isothermal Fragmentation: Is there a low-mass cut-off?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1847 , archivePrefix =. 1804.08574 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Simulating a metallicity-dependent initial mass function: consequences for feedback and chemical abundances. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2688 , archivePrefix =. 1710.04222 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    A Possible Solution for the M/L-[Fe/H] Relation of Globular Clusters in M31. II. The Age-Metallicity Relation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6719 , archivePrefix =. 1703.04635 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Magnetic processes in a collapsing dense core. II. Fragmentation. Is there a fragmentation crisis?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078310 , archivePrefix =. 0709.2887 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    What Is the Role of Stellar Radiative Feedback in Setting the Stellar Mass Spectrum?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbfab , archivePrefix =. 2010.03539 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [48]

    Quasar-like objects to test for a variable stellar initial mass function

    The formation of ultra compact dwarf galaxies and massive globular clusters. Quasar-like objects to test for a variable stellar initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731240 , archivePrefix =. 1708.07127 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [49]

    , keywords =

    Impact of metallicity and star formation rate on the time-dependent, galaxy-wide stellar initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833055 , archivePrefix =. 1809.04603 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [50]

    , keywords =

    The cosmic microwave background and the stellar initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2123 , archivePrefix =. 1809.03502 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [51]

    , keywords =

    The Magellanic Bridge Cluster NGC 796: Deep Optical AO Imaging Reveals the Stellar Content and Initial Mass Function of a Massive Open Cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab609 , archivePrefix =. 1801.01490 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    The big problems in star formation: The star formation rate, stellar clustering, and the initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001 , archivePrefix =. 1402.0867 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [53]

    , keywords =

    Early star formation and the evolution of the stellar initial mass function in galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02045.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9808145 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 1998

  53. [54]

    , keywords =

    Thermal physics, cloud geometry and the stellar initial mass function. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08881.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0412357 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2005

  54. [55]

    , keywords =

    The minimum Jeans mass or when fragmentation must stop. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/176.2.367 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/176.2.367

  55. [57]

    , keywords =

    IMF&ndashMetallicity: A Tight Local Relation Revealed by the CALIFA Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/2/L31 , archivePrefix =. 1506.00638 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  56. [58]

    , keywords =

    Fornax 3D project: a two-dimensional view of the stellar initial mass function in the massive lenticular galaxy FCC 167. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935360 , archivePrefix =. 1903.10514 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  57. [59]

    , keywords =

    Fornax 3D project: Assessing the diversity of IMF and stellar population maps within the Fornax Cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141348 , archivePrefix =. 2107.14243 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [60]

    , keywords =

    The IMF and multiplicity of stars from gravity, turbulence, magnetic fields, radiation, and outflow feedback. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2338 , archivePrefix =. 2106.06521 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [61]

    , keywords =

    Theory of Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602 , archivePrefix =. 0707.3514 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [62]

    , keywords =

    On the Origin of the Salpeter Slope for the Initial Mass Function. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L46 , archivePrefix =. 1108.2287 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  61. [63]

    , keywords =

    Low-metallicity Star Formation: Prestellar Collapse and Protostellar Accretion in the Spherical Symmetry. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1793 , archivePrefix =. 1008.4262 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [64]

    Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =

    Universality of the Stellar Initial Mass Function. Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =

    1997

  63. [65]

    , keywords =

    The Stellar Initial Mass Function from Turbulent Fragmentation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341790 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0011465 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [66]

    , keywords =

    The influence of a top-heavy integrated galactic IMF and dust on the chemical evolution of high-redshift starbursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa848 , archivePrefix =. 1908.06832 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  65. [67]

    , keywords =

    SDSS-IV MaNGA: the spatially resolved stellar initial mass function in 400 early-type galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty785 , archivePrefix =. 1803.08515 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [68]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    EDGE: The sensitivity of ultra-faint dwarfs to a metallicity-dependent initial mass function. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  67. [69]

    , keywords =

    Do fragmentation and accretion affect the stellar initial mass function?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa787 , archivePrefix =. 2003.07639 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  68. [70]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =

    Stellar initial mass function over a range of redshifts. Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =. doi:10.1002/asna.202113897 , archivePrefix =. 2010.07692 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  69. [71]

    , keywords =

    MUSE observations of M87: radial gradients for the stellar initial-mass function and the abundance of sodium. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1092 , archivePrefix =. 1711.08980 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [75]

    Science , keywords =

    An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.aan0106 , archivePrefix =. 1801.03107 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [76]

    , keywords =

    The importance of magnetic fields for the initial mass function of the first stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1926 , archivePrefix =. 2002.11502 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  72. [77]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic field amplification in accretion discs around the first stars: implications for the primordial IMF. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab531 , archivePrefix =. 2007.02678 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  73. [78]

    , keywords =

    When did the initial mass function become bottom-heavy?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2921 , archivePrefix =. 2107.08634 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [79]

    , keywords =

    Thermal Regulation and the Star-forming Main Sequence. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab66b7 , archivePrefix =. 1909.12303 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  75. [80]

    The Stellar Initial Mass Function in Early-type Galaxies from Absorption Line Spectroscopy. III. Radial Gradients. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7135 , archivePrefix =. 1611.09859 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [81]

    , keywords =

    The galaxy-wide initial mass function of dwarf late-type to massive early-type galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1806 , archivePrefix =. 1309.6634 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [82]

    Observational tests and the publicly available GalIMF code

    The optimally sampled galaxy-wide stellar initial mass function. Observational tests and the publicly available GalIMF code. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730987 , archivePrefix =. 1707.04260 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [83]

    , keywords =

    SDSS-IV MaNGA: stellar initial mass function variation inferred from Bayesian analysis of the integral field spectroscopy of early-type galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz764 , archivePrefix =. 1811.09799 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [84]

    A Possible Solution for the M/L-[Fe/H] Relation of Globular Clusters in M3. I. A Metallicity- and Density-dependent Top-heavy IMF. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/89 , archivePrefix =. 1605.04913 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [85]

    , keywords =

    Bound star clusters observed in a lensed galaxy 460 Myr after the Big Bang. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07703-7 , archivePrefix =. 2401.03224 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.