Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Phase equilibria in MnSb2Te4-GeSb2Te4 system and magnetic properties of Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 solid solutions

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ge substitution succeeds across the full MnSb2Te4–GeSb2Te4 composition range

desk verdict A useful new composition series with systematic magnetic data, but the structural claim that Ge sits on Mn sites rests on a Vegard argument that appears to contradict known ionic radii and end-member lattice constants. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18925 v1 pith:GJM4Y6RI submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Fuad Safarov , Dunya Babanly , Jerome Robert , Elnur Orujlu , Elvin Ahmadov , Martin Bowen , Bohdan Kundys This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el MSC 82D40 PACS 75.30.Kz75.50.Gg75.60.Ej
keywords MnSb2Te4Gesolidsolutionphasediagramferrimagnetismspin-floptransitionnegativemagnetizationmagnetictopologicalinsulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that germanium can replace manganese in MnSb2Te4 over the entire composition range, producing homogeneous, single-phase solid solutions, and that this substitution continuously tunes the magnetic behavior. The authors construct the first T–x phase diagram for the MnSb2Te4–GeSb2Te4 system, showing peritectic melting, and map two magnetic transitions: a paramagnetic-to-ferrimagnetic ordering near 24 K plus a lower ferrimagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transition that peaks around x ≈ 0.32. Along the series, magnetization and effective moment decrease, while negative magnetization (x = 0, 0.12) and two spin-flop steps (x = 0.32, 0.55) appear as competing orderings develop. If correct, this gives a continuously tunable magnetic platform in a topological-insulator family, useful for future transport and surface-state studies.

What carries the argument

The Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 solid solution series itself, with Ge2+ and Mn2+ of similar ionic radius in the same rhombohedral septuple-layer structure. The load-bearing evidence is the T–x phase diagram built from DTA heating curves and PXRD indexing, the Vegard's-law analysis of lattice parameters (notably c and V), and ZFC/FC magnetization curves whose first derivatives locate the two magnetic transitions. The spin-flop features in dM/dH at 1.2–1.4 and 3.0–3.5 kOe serve as the fingerprints of competing magnetic orderings.

What would settle it

A single-crystal structure refinement or atom-resolved STEM mapping showing Ge preferentially on Sb sites, or the appearance of a second phase invisible to PXRD (e.g., Ge2Sb2Te5), would collapse the central claim that Ge substitutes at Mn sites and that the magnetic trends are pure dilution effects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, Ge substitution at Mn sites in MnSb2Te4 is successful across the entire range x = 0 to 1, as evidenced by qualitatively identical powder X-ray diffraction patterns and a linear increase in c and cell volume with x (Vegard's law). The phase diagram shows that all members melt via peritectic reactions and form homogeneous γ-phase solid solutions. Magnetically, Ge acts as a diluent that weakens intralayer ferromagnetic coupling, so the Curie temperature falls and the samples evolve from ferrimagnetic (up to x = 0.75) to paramagnetic (x ≈ 0.94); the low-temperature transition from ferrimagnetic to ferromagnetic follows a dome centered near x ≈ 0.32, and two sharp spin-flop

Load-bearing premise

The series is taken to be homogeneous and single-phase with Ge on Mn sites based on powder X-ray patterns that look alike and a linear increase in c and cell volume, but no measurement directly locates the Ge atoms in the crystal structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 is a continuous solid-solution platform, so magnetic dilution can be dialled to any level rather than only at discrete stoichiometries.
  • The phase diagram gives crystal growers the peritectic temperatures and composition windows needed to grow homogeneous single crystals of any intermediate x.
  • Magnetic order (ferrimagnetism) persists up to x = 0.75, so transport and topological studies can be performed in the ordered regime across most of the series.
  • The dome in the lower transition temperature identifies the x ≈ 0.32 composition as the point of strongest low-temperature ferromagnetic tendency.
  • Negative magnetization and exchange bias in low-x samples connect the series to the antisite-defect physics already known in MnSb2Te4.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Ge truly occupies Mn sites, this substitution offers an alternative knob to Mn–Sb antisite disorder for tuning the magnetic gap in this topological-insulator family; a single-crystal magnetotransport or ARPES study would test whether the series reaches a quantum anomalous Hall or axion regime.
  • The dome-like T(x) and the two spin-flop fields suggest a re-entrant competition between intralayer FM and AFM couplings; a random-dilution exchange model could predict where the dome peak should sit and whether it shifts under applied field.
  • The authors themselves state that the exact mechanism behind the dome 'requires a separate study'; a natural next step is to measure the same series with local probes (μSR, neutron diffraction) to see whether the lower transition really involves freezing of Mn-on-Sb moments, as proposed.
  • The absence of a systematic trend in a and b, alongside the increase in c and V, leaves open the possibility that some Ge enters Sb sites; a direct site-occupancy measurement would confirm whether the magnetic-dilution interpretation is complete or partly misassigned.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports synthesis, structural characterization, phase equilibria, and magnetization studies of Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 solid solutions across the full composition range. The authors claim that Ge substitutes on Mn sites, producing homogeneous single-phase samples, and construct the MnSb2Te4–GeSb2Te4 phase diagram from DTA data. Magnetic measurements show ferrimagnetic ordering up to x = 0.75, two magnetic transitions (paramagnetic-to-ferrimagnetic near 24 K and a lower-temperature ferrimagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transition with a dome-shaped composition dependence), negative magnetization in the ZFC curves of the x = 0 and x = 0.12 samples, and two spin-flop transitions around x = 0.32 and x = 0.55. The paper argues that Ge substitution progressively dilutes the Mn sublattice and tunes competing interactions, making the series a platform for future magnetic-topological studies.

Significance. If the structural and magnetic claims are correct, the paper provides a potentially useful continuous composition platform in the MnSb2Te4 family, where Ge substitution tunes magnetic order while preserving the layered tetradymite structure. The EDS composition analysis, the attempted phase-diagram construction from DTA, and the systematic ZFC/FC and M(H) data set are valuable experimental contributions. The paper also documents unusual observations—negative magnetization and two spin-flop transitions—that merit further study. However, the central structural evidence for Ge-on-Mn substitution is currently not established to the standard required for the full-solubility claim, and the magnetic parameter trends are presented without uncertainties. The paper is measurement-based and does not dress fitted quantities as predictions; its weaknesses are evidentiary and analytical rather than circular.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 4] The central structural argument for full-range Ge-on-Mn substitution rests on an increasing c axis and unit-cell volume with x, attributed to a claimed larger ionic size of Ge2+ compared with Mn2+. This premise is inconsistent with standard Shannon radii (six-coordinate Ge2+ ≈ 0.73 Å vs high-spin Mn2+ ≈ 0.83 Å) and with published hexagonal end-member lattice parameters (GeSb2Te4: a ≈ 4.20 Å, c ≈ 40.6 Å; MnSb2Te4: a ≈ 4.22–4.25 Å, c ≈ 40.8 Å). Ge substitution should therefore shrink the cell and shift reflections to higher 2θ, not lower. If Fig. 4 genuinely shows increasing c, either the lattice-parameter refinement (performed against a MnSb2Te4 reference without site-occupancy refinement) is misindexed, the synthesized GeSb2Te4 end member is not the standard hexagonal phase, or the text/figure is in error. This directly undermines the Vegard-law evidence and the conclusion that Ge enters
  2. [§3.2, Table 1 and Conclusion] The claim of homogeneous single-phase full solid solutions is supported only by 'qualitatively indistinguishable' PXRD patterns and a roughly linear c(x) trend. No site-occupancy refinement is performed, so Ge is not shown to occupy the Mn 3a site; it could in principle occupy Sb sites, form interstitial defects, or be compensated by off-stoichiometry. The EDS-derived formulas in Table 1 show systematic Te deficiency (3.81–3.89 Te per formula unit), Sb excess, and a pristine composition Mn1.22Sb1.97Te3.81. These deviations are substantial enough to affect both lattice parameters and magnetism, yet they are dismissed as 'slight deviations' and not considered in the interpretation. The authors should quantitatively address phase purity (including PXRD detection limits), possible Ge/Sb mixing, and whether the c(x) trend tracks Ge content or the observed Te deficiency/vacancy variation.
  3. [§3.4, Figs. 7–9 and S6–S10] The magnetic parameters—Curie constants, Weiss temperatures, effective moments, transition temperatures TC and T*, and saturation magnetizations—are extracted from linear fits and derivative peaks, but no fitting ranges, goodness-of-fit values, or propagated uncertainties are reported. The paper's central magnetic claims (systematic decrease of μ_eff and Msat with x, and the dome-shaped T*(x) with a maximum near x = 0.32) require error bars to establish significance, especially for compositions with similar values (e.g., x = 0.32 vs 0.55). Please provide fit statistics, uncertainties on all extracted parameters, and, if possible, a description of how TC and T* were defined from the derivative curves.
  4. [§3.3, Fig. 5] The constructed T–x phase diagram is said to be based on interpretation of DTA heating curves, but no DTA curves, peak assignments, or invariant/monovariant temperature determinations are shown in the main text or described in enough detail to be independently assessed. The peritectic reactions (1) and (2) are inferred from prior binary phase diagrams, and the α and δ fields are drawn with dashed lines without presenting the underlying DTA evidence. For a paper whose title and abstract foreground phase equilibria, at least representative DTA data and the assignment of thermal events to the labeled phase fields should be included.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'MnSb2Te4GeS-b2Te4 phase diagram' should read 'MnSb2Te4–GeSb2Te4 phase diagram'.
  2. [§3.2 and Fig. 4] The term 'Rietveld refinement' is used, but only lattice parameters and cell volumes were refined against a reference pattern. If site occupancies and atomic coordinates were not refined, this is profile matching or a Le Bail-type fit; the terminology should be corrected.
  3. [Fig. 4] Lattice parameters are plotted without error bars and without the fitted Vegard line or its parameters. Adding these would make the linearity claim quantitatively assessable.
  4. [§3.1, Table S1] For the x = 0.55 sample, Si and C are detected in EDS but described as 'negligible' without quantified amounts. Please report the quantified values or remove the statement.
  5. [References] Reference [56] appears to be a preprint version of reference [20]; one of the two should be removed to avoid duplication.
  6. [§3.4, Fig. 6] The notation dχn/dT is not defined. It is presumably the derivative of molar susceptibility; please define it explicitly in the text or caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the results are direct measurements; self-cited binary phase-diagram data are external building blocks, not self-justifying inputs.

full rationale

The paper's claims are measurement-driven: successful Ge substitution is argued from SEM-EDS compositions, PXRD single-phase patterns and Vegard-type lattice trends; the phase diagram is constructed from the authors' own DTA heating curves 'taking into account ... literature data on phase equilibria' (refs 26, 40, 41); and the magnetic conclusions are extracted from SQUID data via standard Curie-Weiss fitting and dχ/dT derivatives. Refs 26 and 41 are self-citations of co-author Orujlu, but they are prior, externally checkable phase-equilibria results used as ingredients, not an imported uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the present full-solubility claim is not stated in them. No equation or fitted parameter is shown to reduce by construction to an input; effective moments, Curie temperatures, and transition fields come from measured data rather than from a parameter fitted to the same quantity then renamed as a prediction. The potentially problematic assumption that Ge2+ is larger than Mn2+ and hence expands c is a factual/interpretive risk, not a circularity: even if wrong, it would weaken the structural evidence but would not make the derivation self-referential. Since no circular step can be exhibited by quoting a reduction, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing assumptions are all experimental/structural: the site of Ge substitution, the validity of Curie–Weiss analysis, the assignment of derivative features to transitions, the portability of binary phase diagrams, and the antisite-defect model. There are no invented particles, forces, or conserved quantities.

free parameters (5)
  • Curie–Weiss Curie constant C(x) = per sample, from linear χ^{-1}(T) fits in 100–300 K (pristine gives μ_eff 5.42 μB)
    Obtained by least-squares fitting to susceptibility; feeds directly into the effective-moment trend claimed in the abstract.
  • Weiss temperature θ(x) = per sample; negative for all (e.g., −18.26 K for pristine, dome-shaped peak near x=0.55)
    Fitted intercept of the same Curie–Weiss lines; central to the claim that AFM interactions weaken with Ge substitution.
  • Effective moment μ_eff(x) = decreases from 5.42 μB (x=0) toward lower values; no error bars
    Computed from C via μ_eff²=3k_B C/(N_A μ_B²); presented as the key 'paramagnetism strengthened / moment reduced' trend.
  • Magnetic transition temperatures TC(x) and T*(x) = TC ≈ 24 K decreasing with x; T* dome-shaped peaking at x≈0.32
    Extracted as peaks of dχ/dT on ZFC/FC curves; used to build the TC–x phase diagram Fig. 7.
  • Saturation magnetization Msat(x) = 1.99 μB/f.u. (x=0) down to 0.33 μB/f.u. (x=0.94) at 7 T and 5 K
    Read from M(H) loops at the maximum 7 T field; the authors note true saturation requires ~60 T, so these are low-field proxy values.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ge2+ substitutes on the Mn 3a site rather than Sb 6c sites
    Invoked in §3.2 to interpret the c-axis expansion and in the Conclusion ('confirm the successful incorporation of Ge into Mn sites'); never tested by site-occupancy refinement, so the magnetic-dilution story depends on it.
  • domain assumption Curie–Weiss law applies in 100–300 K for all samples
    Used in §3.4 to extract C and θ; the linearity of the inverse susceptibility plots is asserted via Figs S6–S7, but no goodness-of-fit statistics are reported.
  • domain assumption Peaks in dχ/dT mark thermodynamic magnetic transitions (TC and T*)
    The entire two-transition phase diagram (Fig. 7) rests on assigning derivative features to PM–FIM and FIM–FM transitions without supporting probes (e.g., neutron diffraction, μSR, heat capacity).
  • domain assumption Prior binary phase diagrams (MnTe–GeTe [40], MnTe–Sb2Te3 [26], GeTe–Sb2Te3 [41]) transfer to the quaternary pseudo-binary section
    The constructed T–x diagram in §3.3 interprets DTA peaks using reaction types and invariant temperatures borrowed from these literature systems.
  • domain assumption Mn–Sb antisite defect model and its magnetic couplings [22–24,45] apply to the Ge-substituted samples
    Used to explain negative magnetization, reduced saturation moment, and the low-temperature FIM–FM transition; the defect concentration and its Ge dependence are not measured in this work.
  • domain assumption Vegard's law holds for cell volume along the series
    The roughly linear c and V increase with x (Fig. 4) is taken as evidence of solid-solution formation; a and b show no trend, and no fit uncertainties are given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase equilibria in MnSb2Te4-GeSb2Te4 system and magnetic properties of Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 solid solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GJM4Y6RI

@misc{pith2026260718925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase equilibria in MnSb2Te4-GeSb2Te4 system and magnetic properties of Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 solid solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GJM4Y6RI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18925}
}
read the original abstract

As a sister compound of the antiferromagnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, MnSb2Te4 is also a candidate for exotic magnetic topological phases. On the other hand, the structurally analogous but nonmagnetic phase-change material GeSb2Te4 is also known to exhibit nontrivial band topology. Motivated by their shared crystal structure, the similar ionic radii of Mn2+ and Ge2+, and the opportunity to explore the interplay between magnetism and topology, here we investigate the effects of Ge substitution at Mn sites in MnSb2Te4. The Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 solid solutions were synthesized via high-temperature solid-state reaction and characterized for composition, structure, phase behavior, and magnetism using SEM-EDS, PXRD, DTA, and SQUID. Ge substitution was successful across the full composition range, producing homogeneous, single-phase samples that melt via peritectic reactions, as confirmed by the MnSb2Te4GeS-b2Te4 phase diagram. Ge substitution strengthens the sample's paramagnetism, but with ferrimagnetic ordering up to x = 0.75, with both effective moment and saturation magnetization decreasing with increasing Ge content. Two distinct magnetic transitions - high-temperature paramagnetic to ferrimagnetic and low-temperature ferrimagnetic to ferromagnetic - were identified, with a dome-like shape dependence of the low-temperature magnetic transition on Ge substitution. A negative magnetization was observed in the pristine MnSb2Te4 and x = 0.12 substituted samples, while two distinct spin-flop transitions appeared in the samples with x = 0.32 and x = 0.55 Ge substitutions as a result of competing magnetic orderings. These findings facilitate future selective single-crystal growth of homogeneous, magnetic phases, paving the way for magneto-transport and topological surface states investigations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18925 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Temperature profile applied during synthesis of the MGST-124 samples. A ramp rate of 7.5 K/min was used. Temperature is given in Kelvin (K), while time is expressed in hours (h). F. Safarov et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 645 (2026) 173969 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Crystal structure of the parent compound MnSb2Te4. The unit cell is outlined in dark black. Blue, red, and green spheres represent Mn, Sb, and Te atoms, respectively. The hexagonal or in-plane view is shown in (a), while the rhombohedral or out-of-plane view is indicated in (b). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) F. Safar… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Room-temperature PXRD patterns of the MGST-124 samples with different Ge substitutions (x). The intensity is given in arbitrary units (a.u.), while the angle is expressed in 2θ. F. Safarov et al. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Lattice parameters a, b, (a = b) and c, along with the unit cell volume V in the Mn1-xGexSb2Te4 samples as functions of Ge substitution (x). Lattice parameters are given in ångstroms (Å), while the unit cell volume is expressed in cubic ångstr ¨ oms (Å ¨ 3 ) [PITH_FUL…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: T–x phase diagram of the MnSb2Te4 – GeSb2Te4 system. The tempera￾ture is given in Kelvin (K), and the composition is expressed in mol % of GeSb2Te4. The region labeled L corresponds to the liquid phase, while the α, δ, and γ phases indicate solid solutions based on MnT…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ZFC and FC curves of molar susceptibility as functions of temperature for the MGST-124 samples with different Ge substitutions (x). Molar susceptibility is given in emu/(mol⋅Oe), while temperature is expressed in Kelvin (K). * C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ). Both the ZFC and FC inverse molar susceptibility vs temperature data fit well to the linearized equation of the Curie-Weiss law in the high temperature range from 100 K to 300 K, as depicted in Figs. S6 and S7. The inverse molar susceptibility increases with increas…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The extracted Weiss temperature and the calculated effective moment as functions of Ge substitution (x) for both ZFC and FC runs. The former is given in Kelvin (K), while the latter is expressed in Bohr magnetons (μB) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ZFC isothermal field-dependent magnetization loops at 5 K for the MGST-124 samples with different Ge substitutions (x). The left y axis shows the magnetization (M) in Bohr magnetons per formula unit (μB/f.u.), while the right y axis displays the first derivative of mag…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hasan, C.L

    M.Z. Hasan, C.L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 3045–3067, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 2010

  2. [2]

    Qi, S.-C

    X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 1057–1110, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1057 2011

  3. [3]

    Moore, The birth of topological insulators, Nature 464 (2010) 194–198, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08916

    J.E. Moore, The birth of topological insulators, Nature 464 (2010) 194–198, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08916

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08916 2010

  4. [4]

    Pesin, A.H

    D. Pesin, A.H. MacDonald, Spintronics and pseudospintronics in graphene and topological insulators, Nat. Mater. 11 (2012) 409–416, https://doi.org/10.1038/ nmat3305. F. Safarov et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 645 (2026) 173969 8

    2012

  5. [5]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.- L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science 340 (2013) 167–170, https://doi.org/10....

    doi:10.1126/science.1234414 2013

  6. [6]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 (2019) 126–143, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-018-0011-5

    doi:10.1038/s42254-018-0011-5 2019

  7. [7]

    X.-L. Qi, T.L. Hughes, S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 195424, https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.78.195424

    2008

  8. [8]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, Quantized anomalous hall effect in magnetic topological insulators, Science 329 (2010) 61–64, https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1187485

    doi:10.1126/science.1187485 2010

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Chen, J.-H

    Y.L. Chen, J.-H. Chu, J.G. Analytis, Z.K. Liu, K. Igarashi, H.-H. Kuo, X.L. Qi, S. K. Mo, R.G. Moore, D.H. Lu, M. Hashimoto, T. Sasagawa, S.C. Zhang, I.R. Fisher, Z. Hussain, Z.X. Shen, Massive Dirac fermion on the surface of a magnetically doped topological insulator, Science...

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Luo, X.-L

    W. Luo, X.-L. Qi, Massive Dirac surface states in topological insulator/magnetic insulator heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 085431, https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.085431

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    P. Li, J. Yu, J. Xu, L. Zhang, K. Huang, Topological-magnetic proximity effect in Sb2Te3/CrI3 heterostructures, Phys. B Condens. Matter 573 (2019) 77–80, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.08.009

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    M. Mogi, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, Y. Kozuka, N. Shirakawa, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, A magnetic heterostructure of topological insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator, Nat. Mater. 16 (2017) 516–521, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4855

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    D. Xiao, J. Jiang, J.-H. Shin, W. Wang, F. Wang, Y.-F. Zhao, C. Liu, W. Wu, M.H. W. Chan, N. Samarth, C.-Z. Chang, Realization of the Axion insulator state in quantum anomalous hall Sandwich Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 056801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevL...

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Nomura, N

    K. Nomura, N. Nagaosa, Surface-quantized anomalous hall current and the magnetoelectric effect in magnetically disordered topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 166802, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.166802

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    J. Wang, B. Lian, X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, Quantized topological magnetoelectric effect of the zero-plateau quantum anomalous hall state, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 081107, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.081107

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    M. Mogi, M. Kawamura, A. Tsukazaki, R. Yoshimi, K.S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, Tailoring tricolor structure of magnetic topological insulator for robust axion insulator, Sci. Adv. 3 (2017) eaao1669, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv. aao1669

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Otrokov, I.I

    M.M. Otrokov, I.I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, D. Estyunin, A. Zeugner, Z.S. Aliev, S. Gaß, A.U.B. Wolter, A.V. Koroleva, A.M. Shikin, M. Blanco-Rey, M. Hoffmann, I. P. Rusinov, A.Y. Vyazovskaya, S.V. Eremeev, Y.M. Koroteev, V.M. Kuznetsov, F. Freyse, J. S´anchez-Barriga, I.R. A...

    2019

  10. [18]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M.Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X.H. Chen, Y. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4, Science 367 (2020) 895–900, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8156

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    C. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. Li, K. He, Y. Xu, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 19 (2020) 522–527, https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41563-019-0573-3

    2020

  12. [20]

    Wimmer, J

    S. Wimmer, J. S´anchez-Barriga, P. Küppers, A. Ney, E. Schierle, F. Freyse, O. Caha, J. Michalicka, M. Liebmann, D. Primetzhofer, M. Hoffmann, A. Ernst, M. M. Otrokov, G. Bihlmayer, E. Weschke, B. Lake, E.V. Chulkov, M. Morgenstern, G. Bauer, G. Springholz, O. Rader, Mn-rich M...

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Eremeev, M.M

    S.V. Eremeev, M.M. Otrokov, E.V. Chulkov, Competing rhombohedral and monoclinic crystal structures in MnPn 2Te4: an ab-initio study, J. Alloys Compd. 709 (2017) 172–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.121

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Murakami, Y

    T. Murakami, Y. Nambu, T. Koretsune, G. Xiangyu, T. Yamamoto, C.M. Brown, H. Kageyama, Realization of interlayer ferromagnetic interaction in MnSb 2Te4 toward the magnetic Weyl semimetal state, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 195103, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195103

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Xiong, Y.-H

    J. Xiong, Y.-H. Peng, J.-Y. Lin, Y.-J. Cen, X.-B. Yang, Y.-J. Zhao, High concentration intrinsic defects in MnSb 2Te4, Materials 16 (2023) 5496, https://doi.org/10.3390/ ma16155496

    2023

  16. [24]

    Liu, L.-L

    Y. Liu, L.-L. Wang, Q. Zheng, Z. Huang, X. Wang, M. Chi, Y. Wu, B. C. Chakoumakos, M.A. McGuire, B.C. Sales, W. Wu, J. Yan, Site mixing for engineering magnetic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021033, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021033

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Nurmamat, K

    M. Nurmamat, K. Okamoto, S. Zhu, T.V. Menshchikova, I.P. Rusinov, V. O. Korostelev, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, T. Miyashita, X. Wang, Y. Ishida, K. Sumida, E.F. Schwier, M. Ye, Z.S. Aliev, M.B. Babanly, I.R. Amiraslanov, E.V. Chulkov, K. A. Kokh, O.E. Tereshchenko, K. Shimada, S. ...

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Orujlu, Z

    E. Orujlu, Z. Aliev, I. Amiraslanov, M. Babanly, Phase equilibria of the MnTe- Sb2Te3 system and synthesis of novel ternary layered compound – MnSb4Te7, Phys. Chem. Solid State 22 (2021) 39–44, https://doi.org/10.15330/pcss.22.1.39-44

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Y. Luo, J. Wang, J. Yang, D. Mao, J. Cui, B. Jia, X. Liu, K. Nielsch, X. Xu, J. He, Microstructural iterative reconstruction toward excellent thermoelectric performance in MnTe, Energy Environ. Sci. 16 (2023) 3743–3752, https://doi.org/ 10.1039/D3EE01902K

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    M.N. Mamontov, Optimization of thermodynamic data on liquidus of Mn-Te phase diagram in associated-solution model; Termodinamicheskoe soglasovanie dannykh po likvidusu fazovoj diagrammy sistemy Mn-Te s pomoshch’yh modeli assotsiirovannykh rastvorov, Neorg. Mater. 32 (1996). ht...

    1996

  21. [29]

    Bletskan, Phase equilibrium in the system AIV-BVI - part II: systems germanium- chalcogen, J

    D. Bletskan, Phase equilibrium in the system AIV-BVI - part II: systems germanium- chalcogen, J. Ovonic Res. 1 (2005) 53–60

    2005

  22. [30]

    Sol´e, C

    S. Sol´e, C. Schmetterer, K.W. Richter, A revision of the Sb-Te binary phase diagram and crystal structure of the modulated γ-phase field, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 43 (2022) 648–659, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-022-00958-5

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    J.-Q. Yan, S. Okamoto, M.A. McGuire, A.F. May, R.J. McQueeney, B.C. Sales, Evolution of structural, magnetic, and transport properties in MnBi2-xSbxTe4, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 104409, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.104409

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    Agaev, A.G

    K.A. Agaev, A.G. Talybov, Electron-diffraction analysis of structure of GeSb 2Te4, Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. USSR 11 (1966) 400

    1966

  25. [33]

    Izzatli, E.N

    S.B. Izzatli, E.N. Orujlu, Y.I. Jafarov, M.B. Babanly, Phase relations and tunable solid solutions in the pseudoternary system MnTe– Sb2Te3–Bi2Te3, J. Chem. Eng. Data 70 (2025) 1759–1768, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00711

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    X. Xu, D. Mao, M.O. Liedke, M. Butterling, J. Cui, J. Wang, Y. Luo, Z. Ge, E. Hirschmann, A. Wagner, J. He, K. Nielsch, R. He, Advancing carriers mobility in MnSb 2Te4 thermoelectrics via tailored textures and vacancy modification, Adv. Energy Mater. 15 (2025) 2500838, https:/...

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    H. Li, Y. Li, Y. Lian, W. Xie, L. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, S. Fan, Glassy magnetic ground state in layered compound MnSb 2Te4, Sci. China-Mater. 65 (2022) 477–485, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-021-1738-9

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    T. Yu, T. Zhang, X. Qu, N. Qi, D. Yuan, X. Su, G. Tan, X. Tang, Z. Chen, Significant enhancement in the thermoelectric performance of the MnSb 2Te4 topological insulator through vacancy regulation and lattice-softening strategies, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17 (2025) 14229–14...

    2025

  29. [37]

    Sahoo, I.J

    M. Sahoo, I.J. Onuorah, L.C. Folkers, E.V. Chulkov, M.M. Otrokov, Z.S. Aliev, I. R. Amiraslanov, A.U.B. Wolter, B. Büchner, L.T. Corredor, C. Wang, Z. Salman, A. Isaeva, R. De Renzi, G. Allodi, Ubiquitous order-disorder transition in the Mn antisite sublattice of the (MnBi 2Te...

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Journal, E

    E.B.P. Journal, E. Orujlu, Phase equilibria in the SnBi 2Te4-MnBi2Te4 system and characterization of the Sn1-xMnxBi2Te4 solid solutions, Phys. Chem. Solid State 21 (2020) 113–116, https://doi.org/10.15330/pcss.21.1.113-116

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    H. Li, Y. Li, Y.-K. Lian, W. Xie, L. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, S. Fan, Spin glass state in layered compound MnSb2Te4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.00898

    2021 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    Johnston, D.E

    W.D. Johnston, D.E. Sestrich, The MnTe-GeTe phase diagram, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 19 (1961) 229–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(61)80111-5

    1961 doi

  33. [41]

    Orujlu, Reinvestigation of the GeTe- Sb2Te3 pseudobinary phase diagram, Azerbaijan Chem

    Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, E.N. Orujlu, Reinvestigation of the GeTe- Sb2Te3 pseudobinary phase diagram, Azerbaijan Chem. J. 0 (2025) 95–103, https://doi.org/10.32737/0005-2531-2025-2-95-103

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    Coey, Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Cambridge University Press, 2010

    J.M.D. Coey, Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  35. [44]

    Sahoo, Z

    M. Sahoo, Z. Salman, G. Allodi, A. Isaeva, L. Folkers, A. Wolter, B. Büchner, R. De Renzi, Impact of Mn-Pn intermixing on magnetic properties of an intrinsic magnetic topological insulator: the μSR perspective, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2462 (2023) 012040, https://doi.org/10.1088/17...

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    Y. Lai, L. Ke, J. Yan, R.D. McDonald, R.J. McQueeney, Defect-driven ferrimagnetism and hidden magnetization in MnBi 2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 184429, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184429

    2021 doi

  37. [46]

    Z. Zang, M. Xi, S. Tian, R. Guzman, T. Wang, W. Zhou, H. Lei, Y. Huang, Y. Ye, Exchange Bias effects in ferromagnetic MnSb2Te4 down to a monolayer, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 4 (2022) 3256–3262, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c00568

    2022 doi

  38. [47]

    X. Hu, X. He, Z. Guo, T. Kamiya, J. Wu, Antisite-defects control of magnetic properties in MnSb2Te4, ACS Nano 18 (2024) 738–749, https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsnano.3c09064

    2024

  39. [48]

    X. Yang, J. Pan, X. He, D. Chu, Critical behavior, magnetic phase diagram, and magnetic entropy change of MnSb2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) 094408, https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.094408

    2024 doi

  40. [49]

    M. Xi, F. Chen, C. Gong, S. Tian, Q. Yin, T. Qian, H. Lei, Relationship between antisite defects, magnetism, and band topology in MnSb2Te4 crystals with TC ≈ 40 K, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13 (2022) 10897–10904, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. jpclett.2c02775

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    D.Y. Yan, M. Yang, P.B. Song, Y.T. Song, C.X. Wang, C.J. Yi, Y.G. Shi, Site mixing induced ferrimagnetism and anomalous transport properties of the Weyl semimetal candidate MnSb2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 224412, https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.103.224412

    2021

  42. [51]

    S. Huan, D. Wang, H. Su, H. Wang, X. Wang, N. Yu, Z. Zou, H. Zhang, Y. Guo, Magnetism-induced ideal Weyl state in bulk van der Waals crystal MnSb2Te4, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021) 192105, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047438. F. Safarov et al. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma...

    2021 doi

  43. [52]

    W. Ge, P.M. Sass, J. Yan, S.H. Lee, Z. Mao, W. Wu, Direct evidence of ferromagnetism in MnSb2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 134403, https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.134403

    2021 doi

  44. [53]

    Z. Zang, Y. Zhu, M. Xi, S. Tian, T. Wang, P. Gu, Y. Peng, S. Yang, X. Xu, Y. Li, B. Han, L. Liu, Y. Wang, P. Gao, J. Yang, H. Lei, Y. Huang, Y. Ye, Layer-number- dependent antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic behavior in MnSb2Te4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 017201, https://doi...

    2022 doi

  45. [54]

    J.-Q. Yan, Z. Huang, W. Wu, A.F. May, Vapor transport growth of MnBi 2Te4 and related compounds, J. Alloys Compd. 906 (2022) 164327, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164327

    2022

  46. [55]

    Tamanna, A

    A.N. Tamanna, A. Lakra, X. Ding, E. Buzi, K. Park, K. Sobczak, H. Deng, G. Sharma, S. Tewari, L. Krusin-Elbaum, Transport chirality generated by a tunable tilt of Weyl nodes in a van der Waals topological magnet, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 9830, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53319-w

    2024 doi

  47. [56]

    Wimmer, J

    S. Wimmer, J. S´anchez-Barriga, P. Küppers, A. Ney, E. Schierle, F. Freyse, O. Caha, J. Michalicka, M. Liebmann, D. Primetzhofer, M. Hoffmann, A. Ernst, M. Otrokov, G. Bihlmayer, E. Weschke, B. Lake, E. Chulkov, M. Morgenstern, G. Bauer, O. Rader, Ferromagnetic MnSb2Te4: a top...

    2020

  48. [57]

    S.-K. Bac, K. Koller, F. Lux, J. Wang, L. Riney, K. Borisiak, W. Powers, M. Zhukovskyi, T. Orlova, M. Dobrowolska, J.K. Furdyna, N.R. Dilley, L. P. Rokhinson, Y. Mokrousov, R.J. McQueeney, O. Heinonen, X. Liu, B.A. Assaf, Topological response of the anomalous hall effect in Mn...

    2022 doi

  49. [58]

    Lujan, J

    D. Lujan, J. Choe, M. Rodriguez-Vega, Z. Ye, A. Leonardo, T.N. Nunley, L.-J. Chang, S.-F. Lee, J. Yan, G.A. Fiete, R. He, X. Li, Magnons and magnetic fluctuations in atomically thin MnBi 2Te4, Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 2527, https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-022-29996-w

    2022 doi

  50. [59]

    O.J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S.C. Fromage, C.J.B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R.B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempaský, J.H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R.P. Campion, A.W. Rushforth, K.W. Edmonds, S.S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, P. Wadley, Nanosc...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.