Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Macroscopic Polarization and Magnetization from Cavity Vacuum Fluctuations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that cavity vacuum fluctuations alone can induce macroscopic polarization and magnetization in materials that have neither in free space, and it maps out all the crystal symmetries for which this is possible.

desk verdict Useful symmetry map for cavity-induced polarization and magnetization, backed by consistent QEDFT checks; the symmetry classification is solid, but the quantitative Mn3Sn predictions inherit an uncontrolled downfolding approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19612 v1 pith:VGGBQ6PV submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jingkai Quan , Chongxiao Fan , Benshu Fan , I-Te Lu , Dante M. Kennes , Angel Rubio This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords cavityquantumelectrodynamicsvacuumfluctuationslight-mattercouplingsymmetryanalysispointgroupsmacroscopicpolarizationmagnetizationanomalousHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the vacuum fluctuations of a cavity's electromagnetic field — with no real photons and no driving light — can push a crystal into a state with nonzero macroscopic polarization or magnetization, even when the material has neither in free space. The central step is a symmetry analysis of the effective photon-free QED Hamiltonian, whose light-matter interaction is a quadratic term (Π̂·ε̃)²; this term preserves inversion and time reversal but breaks specific rotations, and the paper uses that to enumerate all crystallographic and magnetic point groups in which cavity-induced polarization (CIP) and cavity-induced magnetization (CIM) are allowed. The enumeration is confirmed by quantum-electrodynamical density functional theory (QEDFT) calculations: in α-quartz the induced polarization traces out a sinusoidal pattern as the cavity rotates, and in antiferromagnetic Mn₃Sn the cavity induces an out-of-plane magnetization together with an anomalous Hall conductivity component that is strictly forbidden outside the cavity. If the paper is right, an empty cavity becomes a continuous, symmetry-based knob for engineering electric and magnetic order without any applied field.

What carries the argument

The effective photon-free QED Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), obtained by downfolding the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian onto its zero-dressed-photon sector in the high-frequency/strong-coupling limit and long-wavelength approximation; the light-matter interaction reduces to −Σ_α(λ̃_α²/2ω̃_α²)(Π̂·ε̃_α)². Its symmetry is the engine of the paper: the term is invariant under inversion and time reversal, but a linearly polarized cavity mode breaks every rotation axis not parallel to ε̃, and breaks twofold rotations whose axes are neither parallel nor perpendicular to ε̃. From this, the paper derives the CIP tensor d and CIM tensor Λ in Voigt notation for all compatible point/magnetic point groups and uses QEDFT w

What would settle it

Measure the induced polarization in α-quartz as a function of cavity rotation angle at a well-characterized coupling ratio; if P_x(θ) does not follow the predicted (λ̃/ω̃)²d₁₁(cos²θ − sin²θ) pattern (with P_y = −2(λ̃/ω̃)²d₁₁ cosθ sinθ) across rotations, the paper's central mechanism is wrong. Alternatively, in Mn₃Sn, look for the predicted σ_xy ≈ 49 S/cm component under the (xz+y) cavity configuration and verify it vanishes when the cavity polarization plane is rotated to restore the protecting mirror symmetry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a dark cavity acts on a material as a quadratic momentum fluctuation term, −Σ_α(λ̃_α²/2ω̃_α²)(Π̂·ε̃_α)², which preserves inversion and time reversal but can break exactly those rotational symmetries that protect zero spontaneous polarization and zero net magnetization. Consequently, at leading order the cavity induces P_i = Σ_α(λ̃_α/ω̃_α)² d_ijk ε̃_j,α ε̃_k,α and M_i = Σ_α(λ̃_α/ω̃_α)² Λ_ijk ε̃_j,α ε̃_k,α, where d and Λ are third-rank response tensors whose independent elements are fixed by the material's point group. The paper enumerates the ten nonpolar point groups compatible with CIP and the complete list of non-ferromagnetic magnetic point groups compatible with

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry map and quantitative predictions assume that the effective photon-free QED Hamiltonian—the high-frequency, long-wavelength downfolding of the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian onto its zero-photon sector—faithfully describes the real cavity-modified ground state for each material studied, and that the pxLDA functional used in the QEDFT calculations correctly captures the coupling-driven change in the electronic structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In α-quartz, a Fabry-Pérot cavity with two orthogonal in-plane modes induces a polarization that varies continuously with rotation angle θ according to P_x = (λ̃²/ω̃²)d₁₁(cos²θ − sin²θ) and P_y = −2(λ̃²/ω̃²)d₁₁ cosθ sinθ; QEDFT matches this closed-form prediction.
  • In AFM-1 Mn₃Sn under the (xz+y) mode configuration, the cavity lifts the mirror symmetry that forbids σ_xy, producing an out-of-plane magnetization M_z = (λ̃²/ω̃²)Λ₃₅ and an anomalous Hall component σ_xy ≈ 49 S/cm at the Fermi level, while σ_xz remains zero.
  • The full enumeration gives a screening rule: any material belonging to one of the ten listed nonpolar point groups is a candidate for cavity-induced polarization, and any in the listed non-ferromagnetic magnetic point groups is a candidate for cavity-induced magnetization; the SM further extends the lists to polar and ferromagnetic cases.
  • Because the coupling is quadratic, both effects scale as (λ̃/ω̃)² and are invariant under reversing the cavity polarization direction, so they are controlled by the cavity mode geometry and coupling ratio rather than by the sign of the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This symmetry mechanism is generic, so the same tables likely apply to other parity/time-reversal-protected responses — e.g., toroidal moments or second-order magnetoelectric coefficients — making the point-group lists a screening guide for cavity-induced multipolar order.
  • The continuous angular dependence in α-quartz implies a practical, voltage-free switch: rotating the crystal by 90° reverses the induced polarization, so a nonpolar material in a dark cavity can act as a geometry-controlled ferroelectric.
  • The (λ̃/ω̃)² scaling points to an experimental path: smaller mode volume, higher finesse, and lower cavity frequency should push the predicted effects into measurable range, and the SM's estimates for Mn₃Sn provide concrete parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a symmetry-based framework for cavity-induced macroscopic polarization (CIP) and magnetization (CIM) from vacuum fluctuations. Starting from the effective photon-free QED Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), the authors derive leading-order response tensors (Eqs. 3–4), identify all crystallographic and magnetic point groups compatible with these effects (Table I; SM Tables S1–S2), and verify the predictions with QEDFT calculations. For α-quartz (point group D3), they predict and confirm a continuously rotatable polarization, Eqs. (6)–(8). For antiferromagnetic Mn3Sn, they predict a cavity-induced out-of-plane magnetization M_z and an anomalous Hall conductivity component σ_xy that is forbidden in free space (Eq. 10; Fig. 3). The symmetry analysis is internally consistent and the tensor forms are cross-checked against Bilbao tools and QEDFT for all ten CIP-compatible nonpolar point groups.

Significance. If the framework is sound, the complete point-group tables provide a practical and general guide for cavity materials engineering, and the α-quartz rotation curve is a falsifiable single-parameter functional prediction. The enumeration is a potentially valuable contribution. The main strengths are the transparent group-theoretic derivations, the consistency check with QEDFT for many point groups, and the explicit symmetry-based selection rules (e.g., σ_xz = 0 while σ_xy becomes allowed). However, the quantitative Mn3Sn predictions—M_z and σ_xy ≈ 49 S/cm—rest on the downfolding to the photon-free Hamiltonian and on an in-house, unpublished exchange-correlation functional. These material-specific numbers are not yet established at the same level of confidence as the symmetry map.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM Sec. I, Eq. (S5); Eq. (1)] The derivation of the photon-free Hamiltonian assumes the high-frequency or strong-coupling limit in which different dressed-photon sectors are off-resonant. For Mn3Sn, a gapless correlated metal, low-energy particle–hole excitations exist at all energies, so no finite cavity frequency can make all electronic excitations off-resonant. The truncation error is therefore uncontrolled, and no convergence or validity check is provided (e.g., fixing λ̃²/ω̃² while varying ω̃, or comparing with a model QED solver). Consequently, the quantitative predictions M_z (Eq. 10) and σ_xy ≈ 49 S/cm (Fig. 3(c)) are not established for the real material. Please either provide such a check or explicitly label these numbers as predictions of the model, not of Mn3Sn.
  2. [SM Eq. (S6); Sec. IV] All QEDFT results rely on the in-house pxLDA functional taken from an unpublished preprint (Ref. [65]). This functional is not independently benchmarked for a correlated 3d antiferromagnet, and the code is not shipped. Since the cavity-induced spin canting, M_z, and σ_xy are computed with this functional, the numerical results are not independently reproducible. Please benchmark pxLDA against established correlated methods (e.g., PBE+U or model QED calculations) or release the implementation and data. Without this, the quantitative QEDFT verification is weakened.
  3. [Table I; SM Tables S1–S2] The claim that Tables I/S1/S2 list 'all' compatible (M)PGs is central to the paper, but the enumeration procedure is not documented in the main text or SM beyond a reference to Bilbao tools. Please specify whether the tables were obtained by a systematic enumeration algorithm and state the compatibility criterion used for a given cavity configuration. This detail is necessary for readers to verify completeness, which is one of the paper's principal assertions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The Voigt contraction d_{l(i)m} ̄ε_m is not defined in the main text; please define the index l(i) and the factor-of-2 convention at first use (SM Table S3 does define it, but the main text should make it self-contained).
  2. [Fig. 2(d)] 'Full agreement' is not quantified; report residuals or a correlation metric between QEDFT points and Eq. (8).
  3. [Fig. 3(c)] State the k-grid and Wannier interpolation parameters in the caption or main text; they currently appear only in the SM.
  4. [References] Several references are unpublished arXiv preprints (e.g., Refs. 25, 26, 31, 47, 65). Please ensure they are accessible and correctly cited, or note their preprint status clearly.
  5. [SM Sec. VI] The statement 'applying other operations does not further reduce the elements' would be more transparent if the remaining generators that were checked were listed explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetry map and tensor forms are derived from external group theory (Bilbao benchmarks), and the one fitted coefficient d11 is used for a genuine angular functional-form prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the model level. Equations (3) and (4) are symmetry-adapted Taylor expansions of the response to the quadratic (Π̂·ε̃)² coupling in Eq. (1), not fits renamed as predictions. The point-group enumerations in Table I are obtained by applying Neumann's principle and are cross-checked against the Bilbao Crystallographic Server (SM Sec. IV), so the claim to have identified 'all' compatible groups is an external group-theory result rather than a self-citation. The α-quartz angular curve, Eq. (8), uses d11 that is openly fitted from one QEDFT configuration ('where d11 is fitted from the QEDFT results of Px(x+z) in Fig. 2(c)'), but the cos²θ−sin²θ and −2cosθsinθ forms are a nontrivial single-parameter prediction verified by independent QEDFT runs at other angles, so this is not statistically forced. The Mn3Sn M_z and σ_xy results are computed within the same QEDFT model, and their symmetry selection rules follow from the magnetic point group, not from a circular parameter. The main residual concern is physical rather than circular: the validity of the photon-free downfolded Hamiltonian, Eq. (1), and the pxLDA functional for a correlated metal like Mn3Sn rests partly on same-group citations (e.g., SM Sec. I, citing Refs. [1,4,5] of the SM, which correspond to main-text Refs. [34,66,53]). That is a quantitative reliability and reproducibility concern, not a definitional or fitting circularity: the symmetry statements would survive as statements about the model even if the extrapolation to real Mn3Sn were quantitatively unreliable.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, mediators, or forces are postulated; the dressed photon parameters (λ̃, ω̃, ε̃) are Bogoliubov renormalizations of physical cavity modes. The free parameters are response-tensor elements extracted from QEDFT plus one hand-chosen coupling ratio. The axioms are dominated by the model Hamiltonian and functional approximations inherited from prior (mostly same-group) work, plus standard group theory.

free parameters (4)
  • d11 (α-quartz CIP tensor element) = not quoted in main text (slope of P_x vs λ̃²/ω̃² for x+z modes)
    Fitted from QEDFT results (Fig 2(c)) and used to predict the rotation curve Eq. (8) and the other configurations in Fig 2(c)-(d). The paper states this fit transparently.
  • d14 (α-quartz CIP tensor element) = not quoted in main text
    Appears in the D3 CIP tensor Eq. (5) and in the consistency relation Eq. (7); determined from QEDFT slopes of the (xz+y) and (yz+x) configurations.
  • Λ11, Λ12, Λ13, Λ35 (Mn₃Sn CIM tensor elements) = not quoted in main text (slopes in Fig 3(b))
    Fitted from QEDFT magnetization curves; Λ35 sets the headline M_z = (λ̃²/ω̃²)Λ35 and the in-plane combination sets M_x in Eq. (10).
  • dressed coupling ratio λ̃²/ω̃² = 0.007 = 0.007 (both demonstrations)
    Hand-chosen operating point for the illustrated cases. For Mn₃Sn it maps to N_cell ≈ 340³ and a 0.17 μm³ sample (SM Sec. VII); it is an experimental knob, not derived.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Effective photon-free QED Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) faithfully describes cavity-modified ground states in the strong-coupling/high-frequency limit
    All symmetry rules and QEDFT results inherit this; downfolded from the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian in SM Sec. I and cited mostly to same-group work (Refs 34, 53, 66; independent support Refs 63, 89).
  • domain assumption Validity of the zero-dressed-photon downfolding for the specific materials studied, including metallic correlated Mn₃Sn
    SM Sec. I; no benchmark for metals or correlated magnets is cited or presented, which is the principal regime risk.
  • domain assumption pxLDA electron-photon functional (Eq. S6) gives quantitatively reliable ground states
    SM Sec. IV; in-house implementation described in an unpublished same-group preprint (Ref 65). Magnitudes, not selection rules, depend on this.
  • standard math Neumann's principle constrains response tensors under point-group / magnetic point-group symmetry
    Used throughout SM Secs. III and VI to derive tensor forms from the character tables and symmetry operations.
  • standard math Zero macroscopic polarization requires a polar point group; zero magnetization is protected by T, PT, and rotational combinations listed in the main text
    Main text symmetry-analysis section; standard crystallographic facts per Refs 54 and 68.
  • domain assumption Dipole / long-wavelength approximation: cavity mode is spatially uniform and fully characterized by polarization direction ε and coupling λ
    Eq. (1); the outlook acknowledges that going beyond it would break inversion and unlock more phenomena.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Macroscopic Polarization and Magnetization from Cavity Vacuum Fluctuations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VGGBQ6PV

@misc{pith2026260719612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Macroscopic Polarization and Magnetization from Cavity Vacuum Fluctuations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VGGBQ6PV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19612}
}
abstract

Cavity light-matter interaction has recently emerged as a new avenue for manipulating material properties without driving fields. Here, we demonstrate that cavity vacuum fluctuations can induce macroscopic polarization (magnetization), even in materials that lack spontaneous polarization (net magnetization) in free space. Starting from the effective photon-free quantum-electrodynamics Hamiltonian, we identify all crystallographic (magnetic) point groups that allow such cavity-induced responses. We derive the form of the corresponding response tensors based on symmetry analysis, whose elements can be obtained by quantum electrodynamical density functional theory (QEDFT) calculations. As representative examples, we show that the cavity-induced polarization in $\alpha$-quartz can be continuously controlled by rotating the cavity. For antiferromagnetic Mn$_3$Sn, we demonstrate that cavity-induced symmetry breaking generates an out-of-plane magnetization, accompanied by an anomalous Hall conductivity component that is forbidden outside the cavity. Our work establishes symmetry as a guiding principle for cavity materials engineering and provides a route for controlling polarization and magnetization through quantum vacuum fluctuations, i.e., cavity materials engineering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19612 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of cavity-induced symmetry breaking and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Illustration of the crystal structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Crystal structure of AFM-1 Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry Rules for Cavity Materials Engineering with Linearly Polarized Vacuum Fields

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a dark cavity with linear polarization, the effective electron-photon coupling is quadratic in momentum, so each point group reduces to the subgroup preserving the polarization axis; the paper classifies this for a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L. W. Martin and A. M. Rappe, Thin-film ferroelectric materials and their applications, Nature Reviews Mate- rials2, 16087 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Fert, Nobel lecture: Origin, development, and fu- ture of spintronics, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1517 (2008)

    A. Fert, Nobel lecture: Origin, development, and fu- ture of spintronics, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1517 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Tokura, S

    Y. Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Multiferroics of spin origin, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 076501 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Keimer and J

    B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, The physics of quantum materials, Nature Physics13, 1045 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Giustino, J

    F. Giustino, J. H. Lee, F. Trier, M. Bibes, S. M. Win- ter, R. Valent ´ ı, Y.-W. Son, L. Taillefer, C. Heil, A. I. Figueroa,et al., The 2021 quantum materials roadmap, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 042006 (2020)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization, nature426, 55 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    A. Fert, R. Ramesh, V. Garcia, F. Casanova, and M. Bibes, Electrical control of magnetism by electric field and current-induced torques, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 015005 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Narita and M

    F. Narita and M. Fox, A review on piezoelectric, mag- netostrictive, and magnetoelectric materials and de- vice technologies for energy harvesting applications, Ad- vanced Engineering Materials20, 1700743 (2018)

    2018

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    M. C. Sekhar, E. Veena, N. S. Kumar, K. C. B. Naidu, A. Mallikarjuna, and D. B. Basha, A review on piezoelec- tric materials and their applications, Crystal Research and Technology58, 2200130 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    J. M. Kim, M. F. Haque, E. Y. Hsieh, S. M. Nahid, I. Zarin, K.-Y. Jeong, J.-P. So, H.-G. Park, and S. Nam, Strain engineering of low-dimensional materi- als for emerging quantum phenomena and functionalities, Advanced Materials35, 2107362 (2023). 6

    2023

  3. [11]

    S. B. Ogale, Dilute doping, defects, and ferromagnetism in metal oxide systems, Advanced materials22, 3125 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    De La Torre, D

    A. De La Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    A. S. Disa, T. F. Nova, and A. Cavalleri, Engineering crystal structures with light, Nature Physics17, 1087 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Mankowsky, M

    R. Mankowsky, M. F¨ orst, and A. Cavalleri, Non- equilibrium control of complex solids by nonlinear phononics, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 064503 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    A. Zong, B. R. Nebgen, S.-C. Lin, J. A. Spies, and M. Zuerch, Emerging ultrafast techniques for studying quantum materials, Nature Reviews Materials8, 224 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nature Reviews Physics4, 33 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Ru- bio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature 606, 41 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    H. M. Bretscher, L. Graziotto, M. H. Michael, A. Mon- tanaro, I.-T. Lu, A. Grankin, J. W. McIver, J. Faist, D. Fausti, M. Eckstein, M. Ruggenthaler, A. Rubio, D. N. Basov, M. Hafezi, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Fluctuation engineering in cavity quan- tum mater...

    2026 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Flick, M

    J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 3026 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Ruggenthaler, N

    M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, J. Flick, H. Ap- pel, and A. Rubio, From a quantum-electrodynamical light–matter description to novel spectroscopies, Nature Reviews Chemistry2, 0118 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    H¨ ubener, U

    H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, C. Sch¨ afer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nature Materials20, 438 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. Kamper Svendsen, S. Latini, H. H¨ ubener, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cavity en- gineering of solid-state materials without external driv- ing, Advances in Optics and Photonics17, 441 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang, J. Xu, D. Sun, B. S. Kim, D. Shin, S. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Pereira,et al., Cavity- altered superconductivity, Nature650, 864 (2026)

    2026

  18. [26]

    H. Xu, A. Baydin, Q. Yi, I.-T. Lu, N. Zhu, T. E. Kritzell, J. Doumani, D. Kim, F. Tay, A. Rubio,et al., Vacuum-dressed superconductivity in NbN observed in a high-Qterahertz cavity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08191 (2026)

    2026

  19. [27]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic,et al., Cavity-mediated ther- mal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS 2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum hall effect, Sci- ence375, 1030 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, F. Appugliese, V. Rokaj, J. Wang, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Rubio, and J. Faist, Testing the renormalization of the von klitzing constant by cavity vacuum fields, Phys- ical Review X14, 021038 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Bori¸ ci, F. Appugliese, C. Re- ichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quantum hall phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Graziotto, J

    L. Graziotto, J. Enkner, S. Chattopadhyay, J. B. Cur- tis, E. Koskas, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, E. Demler, and J. Faist, Cavity quantum electrodynam- ics control of quantum hall stripes, Nature Physics , 1 (2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    Ruggenthaler, J

    M. Ruggenthaler, J. Flick, C. Pellegrini, H. Appel, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory, Physical Review A90, 012508 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Flick, C

    J. Flick, C. Sch¨ afer, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Ab initio optimized effective potentials for real molecules in optical cavities: Photon contributions to the molecular ground state, ACS photonics5, 992 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Sch¨ afer, F

    C. Sch¨ afer, F. Buchholz, M. Penz, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Making ab initio QED functional(s): Non- perturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2110464118 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, E. F. Kjønstad, A. Rubio, and H. Koch, Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states, Physical Review X 10, 041043 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    McTague and J

    J. McTague and J. J. Foley, Non-Hermitian cavity quan- tum electrodynamics–configuration interaction singles approach for polaritonic structure with ab initio molecu- lar Hamiltonians, The Journal of Chemical Physics156 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    A. E. DePrince, Cavity-modulated ionization potentials and electron affinities from quantum electrodynamics coupled-cluster theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics 154(2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    N. Vu, D. Mejia-Rodriguez, N. P. Bauman, A. Panyala, E. Mutlu, N. Govind, and J. J. Foley IV, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics complete active space configuration interaction theory, Journal of Chemical Theory and Com- putation20, 1214 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and E. Demler, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with hyperbolic van der Waals materi- als, Physical Review Letters130, 216901 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Rom´ an-Roche,´A

    J. Rom´ an-Roche,´A. G´ omez-Le´ on, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Linear response theory for cavity QED materials at ar- bitrary light-matter coupling strengths, Physical Review B111, 035156 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Castagnola, R

    M. Castagnola, R. R. Riso, Y. El Moutaoukal, E. Ronca, and H. Koch, Strong coupling quantum electrodynamics Hartree–Fock response theory, The Journal of Physical 7 Chemistry A129, 4447 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Science Advances4, eaau6969 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, S. Latini, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Ru- bio, Cavity-enhanced superconductivity in MgB 2 from first-principles quantum electrodynamics (QEDFT), Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2415061121 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Lin, H.-C

    Z. Lin, H.-C. Chan, W. Yang, Y. Sha, C. Xiao, S. Zhang, and W. Yao, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking of Cavity Vacuum and Emergent Gyrotropic Effects in Embedded Moir´ e Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 046903 (2026)

    2026

  37. [45]

    Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A

    E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A. Sriram, M. Claassen, and A. Rubio, Controlling the magnetic state of the proximate quantum spin liquidα-RuCl 3 with an optical cavity, npj Compu- tational Materials9, 202 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    C. Fan, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, X. Cheng, L. Grunwald, Z. Zhang, D. M. Kennes, D. N. Basov, and A. Rubio, Cavity control of multiferroic order in single-layer NiI 2, npj Computational Materials12, 205 (2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    Yarmohammadi, L

    M. Yarmohammadi, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. K. Freericks, Cavity-induced coherent magnetization and polaritons in altermagnets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16248 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    C. B. Dag and V. Rokaj, Engineering topology in graphene with chiral cavities, Physical Review B110, L121101 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G

    B. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G. Platero, and ´A. G´ omez-Le´ on, Quantum origin of anomalous Floquet phases in cavity- QED materials, Communications Physics7, 419 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Shin, I.-T

    D. Shin, I.-T. Lu, B. Fan, E. V. Bostr¨ om, H. Liu, M. K. Svendsen, S. Latini, P. Tang, and A. Rubio, Multiple photon field-induced topological states in bulk HgTe, Sci. Adv.12, eaea5823 (2026)

    2026

  43. [51]

    X. Wang, E. Ronca, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum electrodynamical Chern insulator: Towards light-induced quantized anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 235156 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    C. Wei, L. Yang, and Q.-D. Jiang, Cavity-vacuum- induced chiral spin liquids in kagome lattices: Tuning and probing topological quantum phases via cavity quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review Letters135, 236901 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    H. Liu, F. Troisi, H. H¨ ubener, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Cavity-mediated electron-electron interactions: Renor- malizing Dirac states in graphene, Science Advances11, eadz1855 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    2007

  47. [56]

    P. G. Radaelli, Breaking symmetry with light: Ultrafast ferroelectricity and magnetism from three-phonon cou- pling, Physical Review B97, 085145 (2018)

    2018

  48. [57]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nature Communications10, 405 (2019)

    2019

  49. [58]

    Neufeld, M

    O. Neufeld, M. E. Tzur, G. Lerner, O. Kfir, A. Fleischer, and O. Cohen, Light symmetry, chirality, and their role in nonlinear optics and ultrafast phenomena, Advances in Optics and Photonics18, 160 (2026)

    2026

  50. [59]

    B. Fan, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, S. Zhou, W. Duan, A. Rubio, and P. Tang, Floquet optical selec- tion rules in black phosphorus, Sci. Adv.11, eadw2744 (2025)

    2025

  51. [60]

    Fragkos, B

    S. Fragkos, B. Fan, U. De Giovannini, D. Descamps, S. Petit, H. H¨ ubener, A. Rubio, and S. Beaulieu, Symmetry-driven Floquet engineering in multivalley SnS, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2603.11878 (2026)

    2026

  52. [61]

    Y. Ke, Z. Song, and Q.-D. Jiang, Vacuum-induced sym- metry breaking of chiral enantiomer formation in chem- ical reactions, Physical Review Letters131, 223601 (2023)

    2023

  53. [62]

    Jayachandran, B

    A. Jayachandran, B. Patrahau, J. G. Ricca, M. Mahato, Y. Pang, K. Nagarajan, A. Thomas, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, A phenomenological symmetry rule for chem- ical reactivity under vibrational strong coupling, Ange- wandte Chemie , e202503915 (2025)

    2025

  54. [63]

    Pantazopoulos, J

    P.-A. Pantazopoulos, J. Feist, A. Kamra, and F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, Electrostatic nature of cavity-mediated in- teractions between low-energy matter excitations, Phys- ical Review B109, L201408 (2024)

    2024

  55. [64]

    I.-T. Lu, M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, S. La- tini, M. Penz, and A. Rubio, Electron-photon exchange- correlation approximation for quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory, Physical Review A109, 052823 (2024)

    2024

  56. [66]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Sch¨ afer, U. De Giovan- nini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO 3: Cavity materials engineering, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2105618118 (2021)

    2021

  57. [67]

    The Supplementary Material also contains Refs

    See Supplementary Material at URL for more informa- tion. The Supplementary Material also contains Refs. [68, 76–89]

  58. [68]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. de la Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bil- bao crystallographic server, Bulg. Chem. Commun43, 183 (2011)

    2011

  59. [69]

    Ballato, Basic material quartz and related innovations, inPiezoelectricity: Evolution and Future of a Technology (Springer, 2008) pp

    A. Ballato, Basic material quartz and related innovations, inPiezoelectricity: Evolution and Future of a Technology (Springer, 2008) pp. 9–35

    2008

  60. [70]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, H. Yang, J. ˇZelezn` y, S. P. Parkin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Strong anisotropic anomalous Hall effect and spin Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnetic compounds Mn 3X (X= Ge, Sn, Ga, Ir, Rh, and Pt), Physical Review B95, 075128 (2017)

    2017

  61. [71]

    V. T. N. Huyen, Y. Yanagi, and M.-T. Suzuki, Anisotropic piezomagnetism in noncollinear antiferro- magnets, Physical Review B112, 104421 (2025)

    2025

  62. [72]

    Kuroda, T

    K. Kuroda, T. Tomita, M.-T. Suzuki, C. Bareille, A. Nu- groho, P. Goswami, M. Ochi, M. Ikhlas, M. Nakayama, S. Akebi,et al., Evidence for magnetic Weyl fermions in a correlated metal, Nature Materials16, 1090 (2017)

    2017

  63. [73]

    Ikhlas, S

    M. Ikhlas, S. Dasgupta, F. Theuss, T. Higo, S. Kittaka, B. Ramshaw, O. Tchernyshyov, C. Hicks, and S. Nakat- suji, Piezomagnetic switching of the anomalous Hall ef- fect in an antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature Physics18, 1086 (2022)

    2022

  64. [74]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- 8 tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  65. [75]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Physical Review X12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  66. [76]

    S. V. Gallego, J. Etxebarria, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, and J. M. Perez-Mato, Automatic calculation of symmetry- adapted tensors in magnetic and non-magnetic materials: a new tool of the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Foun- dations of Crystallography75, 438 (2019)

    2019

  67. [78]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Physical Review X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  68. [80]

    Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Physical Review B—Condensed Mat- ter and Materials Physics88, 085117 (2013)

    D. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Physical Review B—Condensed Mat- ter and Materials Physics88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  69. [81]

    M. J. Van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rig- nanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 ele- ment optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Computer Physics Communications226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  70. [82]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review let- ters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  71. [84]

    Vanderbilt,Berry phases in electronic structure the- ory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topo- logical insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry phases in electronic structure the- ory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topo- logical insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  72. [86]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune,et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  73. [87]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials1(2013)

    2013

  74. [88]

    D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Foundations of Crystal- lography33, 279 (1977)

    1977

  75. [89]

    Macroscopic Polarization and Magnetization from Cavity Vacuum Fluctuations

    M. K. Svendsen, M. Ruggenthaler, H. H¨ ubener, C. Sch¨ afer, M. Eckstein, A. Rubio, and S. Latini, Ef- fective equilibrium theory of quantum light-matter in- teraction in cavities for extended systems and the long wavelength approximation, Communications Physics8, 425 (2025). ...

    2025

  76. [90]

    Sch¨ afer, F

    C. Sch¨ afer, F. Buchholz, M. Penz, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Making ab initio QED functional(s): Nonperturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2110464118 (2021)

    2021

  77. [91]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. Kamper Svendsen, S. Latini, H. H¨ ubener, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving, Advances in Optics and Photonics17, 441 (2025)

    2025

  78. [92]

    I.-T. Lu, M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, S. Latini, M. Penz, and A. Rubio, Electron-photon exchange-correlation approximation for quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory, Physical Review A109, 052823 (2024)

    2024

  79. [93]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Sch¨ afer, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO3: Cavity materials engineering, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2105618118 (2021)

    2021

  80. [94]

    H. Liu, F. Troisi, H. H¨ ubener, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Cavity-mediated electron-electron interactions: Renormalizing Dirac states in graphene, Science Advances11, eadz1855 (2025)

    2025

  81. [95]

    Fan, I.-T

    B. Fan, I.-T. Lu, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Unified ab initio quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory for cavity-modified electron-phonon-photon coupling in solids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.24095 (2026). 12

    2026 arXiv

  82. [96]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter(Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    2007

  83. [97]

    S. V. Gallego, J. Etxebarria, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, and J. M. Perez-Mato, Automatic calculation of symmetry-adapted tensors in magnetic and non-magnetic materials: a new tool of the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Foundations of Crys- tallography75, 438 (2019)

    2019

  84. [98]

    H. F. Jones,Groups, representations and physics(CRC Press, 2020)

    2020

  85. [99]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder,et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1(2013)

    2013

  86. [100]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. de la Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bilbao crystallographic server, Bulg. Chem. Commun43, 183 (2011)

    2011

  87. [101]

    Elcoro, J

    L. Elcoro, J. Etxebarria, J. M. Perez-Mato, and E. S. Tasci, Automatic calculation of symmetry-adapted tensors under spin-group symmetry. STENSOR, a new tool of the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01140 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  88. [102]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Physical Review X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  89. [103]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf` a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. De Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino,et al., Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale, The Journal of chemical physics152(2020)

    2020

  90. [104]

    Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mate- rials Physics88, 085117 (2013)

    D. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mate- rials Physics88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  91. [105]

    M. J. Van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Computer Physics Communications226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  92. [106]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  93. [107]

    King-Smith and D

    R. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Physical Review B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  94. [108]

    Vanderbilt,Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  95. [109]

    X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Ab initio calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 195118 (2006)

    2006

  96. [110]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  97. [111]

    M. K. Svendsen, M. Ruggenthaler, H. H¨ ubener, C. Sch¨ afer, M. Eckstein, A. Rubio, and S. Latini, Effective equilibrium theory of quantum light-matter interaction in cavities for extended systems and the long wavelength approximation, Communications Physics8, 425 (2025)

    2025

  98. [112]

    D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Foundations of Crystallography33, 279 (1977)

    1977

  99. [113]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  100. [114]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review X12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.