Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Nitrospinics as a platform from orbital-torque memory to artificial intelligence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nitride materials, led by the two-dimensional MXene Cr2N, can generate the orbital currents that switch magnetic memory bits without needing a magnetic field, and the same platform extends toward neuromorphic and probabilistic computing har

desk verdict A clearly written perspective that repackages the group's own prior nitride orbital-torque results into a 'Nitrospinics' framework; the central Cr2N field-free switching claim is not yet tied to orbital torque. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19656 v1 pith:UXFSFD6K submitted 2026-07-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Prabhat Kumar , Gaurav Kumar Shukla , Yoshio Miura , Shinji Isogami This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Nitrospinicsorbitaltorquesspin-orbitCr2NMXeneHalleffectfield-freemagnetizationswitchingantiferromagneticnitridesneuromorphiccomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Orbital currents — flows of electron orbital angular momentum — can exert torques on magnets almost as effectively as the spin currents used in today's spintronics, and they do not require heavy metals with strong spin-orbit coupling. This paper argues that nitrides form a new materials platform — called 'Nitrospinics' — where nitrogen atoms intercalated in a transition-metal lattice provide both the symmetry breaking and the d-p orbital hybridization needed to generate and convert orbital currents efficiently. The prototype is Cr2N, a two-dimensional MXene grown by reactive sputtering, in which field-free current-induced magnetization switching (CIMS) has been demonstrated in Cr2N/[Co/Pt]3 bilayers, without the in-plane magnetic field normally required. First-principles calculations on Mn3PtN versus Mn3Pt show that adding nitrogen boosts the spin Berry curvature along specific k-lines, linking the enhanced torque to nitrogen's 2p orbitals. If the framework holds, nitrides offer a cheap, thermally stable, and tunable route from orbital-torque memory to AI hardware such as p-bits and neuromorphic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the orbital torque: an electric current generates an orbital current via the orbital Hall effect (OHE) or the orbital Rashba–Edelstein effect (OREE), and this orbital angular momentum is converted into spin angular momentum at the ferromagnet/nitride interface, captured by a conversion coefficient η_L-S^FM in the effective spin-Hall angle θ_SH^eff = (2e/ħ)(σ_SH^NM + σ_OH^NM η_L-S^FM)/σ_xx^NM. The paper's central object is Cr2N, a 2D MXene whose hexagonal lattice with nitrogen terminations supports this conversion, aided by nitrogen interstitials that break local inversion symmetry and by d-p hybridization that enhances spin Berry curvature. For antiperovskite ni

What would settle it

Measure the damping-like torque efficiency of a Cr2N/ferromagnet bilayer as a function of Cr2N thickness and compare with a control where Cr2N is replaced by pure Cr or where the [Co/Pt]3 multilayer is replaced by a single Co layer. If the switching signal and torque efficiency do not scale with Cr2N thickness or orbital-current expectations, or if field-free switching survives only with the Pt-containing multilayer, the orbital-torque mechanism is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that nitride materials, and 2D layered nitrides like Cr2N in particular, constitute a new conceptual and functional platform — 'Nitrospinics' — that can generate orbital currents and convert them into spin torques without relying on heavy elements. Nitrogen acts in two ways: interstitially, it breaks the local crystal symmetry of the transition-metal host (e.g., in antiperovskite X4N), and electronically, its 2p orbitals hybridize with the host's 3d orbitals, enhancing the spin Berry curvature responsible for charge-to-spin conversion. As evidence, the paper cites field-free CIMS observed in Cr2N/[Co/Pt]3, isotropic with respect to current direction, and first-pr

Load-bearing premise

That the field-free magnetization switching observed in Cr2N/[Co/Pt]3 is caused by orbital torques generated in the Cr2N layer, rather than by other effects such as uncompensated interfacial magnetic moments from the adjacent ferromagnet — a possibility the paper itself explicitly raises.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nitrides give spintronics an alternative to expensive heavy metals (Pt, W, Ta) as torque sources, using earth-abundant transition metals plus nitrogen.
  • Field-free switching in Cr2N/[Co/Pt]3 removes the need for an applied in-plane magnetic field or symmetry-breaking stacks in SOT-MRAM, simplifying device integration.
  • Nitrogen content and layer thickness become engineering knobs: CrN and VN show opposite torque signs and tunable efficiencies, enabling sign control that pure metals do not offer.
  • The high thermal stability of Cr2N (no nitrogen desorption up to ~650 °C) supports CMOS-compatible back-end processing.
  • If the orbital-torque interpretation is right, the same materials class can drive neuromorphic and probabilistic computing devices that exploit tunable torque efficiency and thermal robustness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If orbital transport is genuinely the switching mechanism, other light interstitial elements (C, B, O) in transition-metal hosts may show analogous or stronger orbital-torque effects, making nitrogen only the first member of a broader family.
  • A direct torque-efficiency measurement on Cr2N (e.g., harmonic Hall or spin-torque FMR) would settle whether Cr2N's field-free switching comes from its own orbital currents or from the adjacent Co/Pt multilayer; the paper's Table I deliberately leaves this value 'N.A.'
  • The isotropic field-free switching, unlike the anisotropic behavior in symmetry-broken TMDCs, hints that interfacial magnetic moments rather than bulk crystal symmetry may be responsible; a test is to swap the Co/Pt multilayer for a single ferromagnet and see if the switching persists.
  • The thermal-orbitronic and optical computing proposals are speculative extensions; a concrete near-term step would be demonstrating a nitride-based p-bit with controlled probabilistic switching.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This perspective paper introduces 'Nitrospinics' as a proposed materials framework in which nitride compounds, especially the 2D MXene Cr2N, serve as sources of orbital currents and orbital torques for spintronic memory and AI hardware. The central experimental evidence is field-free current-induced magnetization switching (CIMS) in Al2O3//Cr2N(5 nm)/[Co(0.35 nm)/Pt(0.3 nm)]3/MgO, previously reported in the authors' own work, together with first-principles calculations of enhanced spin Berry curvature in Mn3PtN versus Mn3Pt. The paper also surveys torque efficiencies of various orbital-source materials, discusses the role of nitrogen in band structure and crystal symmetry, and outlines speculative applications in neuromorphic, probabilistic, thermal-orbitronic, and optical computing. The central claim is that nitride materials provide a distinct and functional platform for orbital-torque devices.

Significance. If the orbital-torque mechanism in Cr2N were firmly established, the proposal of Nitrospinics as a materials platform would be a useful conceptual contribution, broadening the design space beyond heavy metals and providing a sustainable alternative for SOT-MRAM and related devices. The paper's strengths include its clear assembly of previously published data (often the authors' own peer-reviewed work) into a coherent narrative, explicit thermal-stability measurements, and a thoughtful discussion of the role of nitrogen p–d hybridization. However, the manuscript is a perspective rather than a primary experimental or computational study: the key field-free CIMS result is reproduced from Ref. [24] without new measurements, no torque efficiency is reported for Cr2N, and the DFT evidence is a spin Berry curvature calculation, not an orbital Hall or orbital-torque calculation. The overarching platform claim therefore rests on an attribution that the manuscript itself acknowledges is not uniquely established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Fig. 5, Table I] The central claim—that field-free CIMS in Cr2N/[Co/Pt]3 is driven by orbital torques from Cr2N—is not supported by the evidence presented. Table I lists no torque efficiency for Cr2N (entry 'N.A.'), and Fig. 5 shows only anomalous Hall switching loops. Section 3.2 explicitly states that the isotropic switching 'may be attributed to an isotropic switching mechanism distinct from crystal-symmetry-driven effects, such as uncompensated interfacial magnetic moments induced by the adjacent ferromagnetic layer.' Since the FM stack contains Pt, a canonical spin Hall metal, conventional SOT from Pt or Oersted fields could explain the switching. No Pt-free control, harmonic-Hall measurement, or orbital-torque-specific measurement is provided. As written, the inference from field-free CIMS to Cr2N orbital torques is not load-bearing; the prototype demonstration of Nitrospinics is therefore undemons
  2. [Section 2.2, Fig. 3] The first-principles argument is presented as support for orbital-torque generation, but Fig. 3(b) shows the spin Berry curvature Ω_y_xz(k, EF) in Mn3PtN versus Mn3Pt. This is a spin-transport quantity, not an orbital Hall conductivity or an orbital-torque efficiency. Even if enhanced spin Berry curvature is present, it does not directly substantiate orbital-current generation or orbital-to-spin conversion in Cr2N, which is a different material. The paper should clarify the logical step between Mn3PtN spin Berry curvature and Cr2N orbital torques, or replace/strengthen this evidence with orbital Hall conductivities or orbital-torque calculations.
  3. [Section 3.2, paragraph 4] The manuscript says 'the mechanisms distinct from those operating in conventional TMDC systems are considered responsible for the field-free CIMS observed in Cr2N.' The word 'considered' is an admission of hypothesis, not demonstration. Given that the paper's abstract and conclusion assert that 'nitrogen contributes to... orbital torque generation' and 'field-free CIMS' are achieved 'by the breaking of local crystal symmetry in nitrides,' the manuscript overstates certainty. The text itself (Section 3.2) offers an alternative (uncompensated interfacial moments). This internal inconsistency between the stated claim and the admitted alternatives requires resolution in a revision, either by adding decisive experiments or by explicitly labeling the mechanism as an open question throughout.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract uses 'exploits nitride materials' and 'prototype system' in a way that suggests demonstrated functionality; consider softening to 'proposed framework' and 'candidate prototype' if the orbital-torque attribution is not established.
  2. [Section 1, near Eq. (1)] Typo: 'transition mentals' should be 'transition metals.' Also 'spin tronic' in the same paragraph should be 'spintronic.'
  3. [Reference list] Several reference formatting issues: Ref. [13] contains a duplicated journal name ('J. Appl. Phys. 105, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07C928 (2009)'), and Ref. [9] has a misformat 'Y. Liuand' (likely 'Y. Liu').
  4. [Section 3.1] The notation 'Cr2N 2D-MXene' is used inconsistently; elsewhere it appears as Cr2N MXene. Please standardize.
  5. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says the projection figures are 'Reproduced with permission from Ref. [25],' but the text in Section 2.2 says 'we performed a projection analysis.' Please clarify which parts are original and which are reproduced, and provide the computational method (e.g., exchange-correlation functional, plane-wave cutoff) if the analysis is original.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the orbital-torque reading of Cr2N field-free CIMS is an acknowledged attribution gap, not a reduction of the claim to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper is a perspective that assembles previously reported experiments and DFT calculations into a proposed materials framework, rather than deriving a quantitative prediction from inputs. The Cr2N field-free CIMS data are cited to the authors' prior published work (Ref. [24]), and the orbital-torque interpretation is itself tentative: Section 3.2 states that the isotropic field-free switching 'may be attributed to an isotropic switching mechanism distinct from crystal-symmetry-driven effects, such as uncompensated interfacial magnetic moments induced by the adjacent ferromagnetic layer [41]', while Table I lists the Cr2N torque efficiency as 'N.A.'. These are explicit limitations/falsifiability gaps, not a circular reduction: no equation or measured quantity is relabeled as a prediction. The DFT support (Section 2.2) reports spin Berry curvature for Mn3PtN vs Mn3Pt reproduced from Ref. [25]; this is a parameter-free first-principles result, not a parameter fitted to the switching data. Eq. (1) is a literature formula used for qualitative discussion, not solved to produce the central claim. The many self-citations ([12,23,24,25,26,27,41,59]) point to independently published, externally falsifiable experiments and calculations, so they constitute real evidence rather than a self-referential derivation chain. I therefore find no step in which the claimed result reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters are introduced because the paper is a perspective. Its central claims depend on trust in prior DFT calculations, the applicability of an established orbital-to-spin conversion model, and an untested symmetry-breaking mechanism.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT with standard functionals reliably predicts spin Berry curvature and orbital hybridization in Mn3PtN vs Mn3Pt.
    The DFT results in Fig. 3 are reproduced from Ref. [25] without method details or error bars; the calculation is assumed trustworthy.
  • domain assumption The linear combination formula for the effective spin-Hall angle (Eq. 1) holds for Cr2N/FM bilayers.
    Eq. (1) is taken from Ref. [8] and assumes independent spin and orbital channels with a conversion coefficient eta_L-S^FM, which is not directly measured for the Cr2N system.
  • ad hoc to paper Interstitial nitrogen breaks local symmetry sufficiently to enable field-free CIMS through orbital torques.
    The paper uses this to explain field-free switching, but also acknowledges uncompensated interfacial magnetic moments as an alternative cause (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption Observed magnetization switching is not dominated by heating or other non-torque artifacts.
    The CIMS loops are interpreted as current-induced switching, but no control experiments ruling out thermal effects are shown in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nitrospinics as a platform from orbital-torque memory to artificial intelligence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXFSFD6K

@misc{pith2026260719656,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nitrospinics as a platform from orbital-torque memory to artificial intelligence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXFSFD6K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19656}
}
read the original abstract

The exploration of energy-efficient and functional spintronics has attracted considerable attention. Orbital transport has opened new pathways for current-induced torque generation beyond the conventional spin transport based on the spin Hall effect. In addition, artificial intelligence computing has been demonstrated using spintronic devices. Further progress of these devices can be anticipated through the development of unique and functional materials beyond the existing heavy metals and topological systems with strong spin-orbit coupling. The nitride materials exhibit unique chemical, magnetic, and structural versatility, including antiferromagnetism, high thermal stability, and compatibility with diverse device architectures. Here, we propose Nitrospinics as a conceptual and functional framework that exploits nitride materials for applications ranging from orbital-torque-based spintronic devices to artificial intelligence hardware. Using Cr2N, a two-dimensional nitride MXene with an atomic layered structure, as a prototype system, we discuss how nitrogen contributes to the structural stability, the orbital torque generation, and the interfacial orbital and spin conversion. We further outline key challenges and opportunities toward establishing nitride-based materials for next-generation computing technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references

  1. [24]

    Kumar, Y

    P. Kumar, Y. Miura, Y. Kotani, A. Sumiyoshiya, T. Nakamura, G. K Shukla, S. Isogami, Small 21, 2500626 (2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  3. [2]

    Bihlmayer, P

    G. Bihlmayer, P. Noël, D. V. Vyalikh, E. V. Chulkov, and A. Manchon, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 642 (2022)

    2022

  4. [3]

    H. An, Y. Kageyama, Y. Kanno, N. Enishi, K. Ando, Nat. Commun. 7, 13069 (2016)

    2016

  5. [4]

    D. Go, D. Jo, T. Gao, K. Ando, S. Blügel, H.-W Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, Phys. Rev. B 103, L121113 (2021)

    2021

  6. [5]

    J. Kim, D. Go, H. Tsai, D. Jo, K. Kondou, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Otani, Phys. Rev. B 103, L020407 (2021)

    2021

  7. [6]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  8. [7]

    Salemi, and P

    L. Salemi, and P. M. Oppeneer, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 095001 (2022)

    2022

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Go, and H.-W

    D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013177 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    Liuand, and Q

    Y. Liuand, and Q. Shao, ACS Nano 14, 9389 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    E. C. Ahn, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 4, 17 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    S. N. Kajale, J. Hanna, K. Jang, and D. Sarkar, Nano Res. 17, 748 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Kumar, Y

    P. Kumar, Y . Miura, Y . Kotani, A . Sumiyoshiya, T . Nakamura, G. K. Shukla, and S . Isogami, Small 21, 2500626 (2025)

    2025

  6. [13]

    Komasaki, M

    Y. Komasaki, M . Tsunoda, S . Isogami, M . Takahashi, J. Appl. Phys. 105, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07C928 (2009)

    2009

  7. [14]

    Isogami, M

    S. Isogami, M. Tsunoda, Y. Komasaki, A. Sakuma, M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Express 3, 103002 (2010)

    2010

  8. [15]

    Tsunoda, Y

    M. Tsunoda, Y. Komasaki, S. Kokado, S. Isogami, C.C. Chen, M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Express 2, 083001 (2009)

    2009

  9. [16]

    Isogami, M

    S. Isogami, M. Tsunoda, M. Oogane, A. Sakuma, M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Express 6, 063004 (2013)

    2013

  10. [17]

    Isogami, M

    S. Isogami, M. Ohtake, and Y.K. Takahashi, J. Appl. Phys. 131, 073904 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    Isogami and T

    S. Isogami and T. Owada, IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 9 (S1), S73 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    Kokado, N

    S. Kokado, N. Fujima, K. Harigaya, H. Shimizu, and A. Sakuma, Phys. Rev. B 73, 172410 (2006)

    2006

  13. [20]

    Nakanishi, M

    K. Nakanishi, M. Kakoki, K. Ohwada, K. Kuroda , K. Sumida, H. Sato, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, S. Isogami, K. Masuda, Y. Sakuraba, and A. Kimura, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023257 (2026). 18

    2026

  14. [21]

    H. Li, G. Wang, D. Li, P. Hu, W. Zhou, X. Ma, S. Dang, S. Kang, T. Dai, F. Yu, X. Zhou, S. Wu, and S. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 092402 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    H. Bai, T. Xu, Y. Dong, H.-A. Zhou, and W . Jiang, Adv. Electron. Mater. 8, 2100772 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    Shukla, P

    G.K. Shukla, P. Kumar, and S. Isogami, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035166 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Tripathi, S.K

    N. Tripathi, S.K. Mishra, Y. Miura, and S. Isogami, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224406 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Isogami, Y

    S. Isogami, Y. Shiokawa, A. Tsumita, E. Komura, Y. Ishitani, K. Hamanaka, T. Taniguchi, S. Mitani, T. Sasaki, and M. Hayashi, Sci. Rep. 11, 16676 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Isogami and Y.K

    S. Isogami and Y.K. Takahashi, Adv. Electron. Mater. 9, 2200515 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    E. Kren, G. Gadar, L. Pal, J. Solyom, and P. Szabo, Phys. Lett. 20, 331 (1966)

    1966

  21. [29]

    Yamaguchi, H

    Y. Yamaguchi, H. Yasui, S. Funahashi, M. Yamada, M. Ohashi, and T. Kanekoa, Phys. B Condens. Matter 180–181 (1992)

    1992

  22. [30]

    Khazaei, M

    M. Khazaei, M. Arai, T. Sasaki, C.-Y. Chung, N. S. Venkataramanan, M. Estili, Y. Sakka, and Y. Kawazoe, Adv. Func. Mater. 23, 2185 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Driscoll, A

    N. Driscoll, A. G. Richardson, K. Maleski, B. Anasori, O. Adewole, P. Lelyukh, L. Escobedo, D. K. Cullen, T. H. Lucas, Y. Gogotsi, and F. Vitale, ACS Nano 12, 10419 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Zhang, N

    J. Zhang, N. Kong, S. Uzun, A. Levitt, S. Seyedin, P. A. Lynch, S. Qin, M. Han, W. Yang, J. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Gogotsi, and J. M. Razal, Adv. Mater. 32, 2001093 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Ahn, T.-H.Han, K

    S. Ahn, T.-H.Han, K. Maleski, J. Song, Y.-H. Kim,M.-H. Park,H. Zhou, S. Yoo, Y. Gogotsi, and T.-W. Lee, Adv. Mater. 32, 2000919 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    S. Zhao, X. Meng, K. Zhu, F. Du, G. Chen, Y. Wei, Y. Gogotsi, and Y. Gao, Energy Storage Mater. 8, 42 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    S. J. Gutiérrez-Ojeda, R . Ponce-Pérez, D . Maldonado-Lopez, D. M. Hoat, J. Guerrero- Sánchez, and M. G. Moreno-Armenta, ACS Omega 7, 33884 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    H. Wu, J. Nance, S. A. Razavi, D. Lujan, B. Dai, Y. Liu, H. He, B. Cui, D. Wu, K. Wong, K. Sobotkiewich, X. Li, G. P. Carman, and K. L. Wang, Nano Lett. 21, 515 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Fukami, C

    S. Fukami, C. Zhang, S. D. Gupta, A. Kurenkov, and H. Ohno, Nat. Mater. 15, 535 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Grimaldi, V

    E. Grimaldi, V . Krizakova, G . Sala, F. Yasin, S . Couet, G. S. Kar, K. Garello, and P . Gambardella, Nat. Nanotech. 15, 111 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. M. Stiehl, M. H. D. Guimaraes, R. A. Buhrman, J. Park, and D. C. Ralph, Nat. Phys. 13, 300 (2017). 19

    2017

  32. [40]

    Q. Xie, W. Lin, S. Sarkar, X. Shu, S. Chen, L. Liu, T. Zhao, C. Zhou, H. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Gradecak, and J. Chena, APL Mater. 9, 051114 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Kumar, S

    P. Kumar, S. Tsuda, K. Yaji, and S. Isogami, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 26, 2551484 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    C. F. Pai, L. Liu, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 122404 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Hao, and G

    Q. Hao, and G. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 034009 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Nakanishi, M

    K. Nakanishi, M. Kakoki, K. Ohwada, K. Kuroda, K. Sumida, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, S. Isogami, K. Masuda, Y. Sakuraba, H. Sato, and A . Kimura, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023257 (2026)

    2026

  37. [45]

    Kokado, N

    S. Kokado, N. Fujima, K. Harigaya, H. Shimizu, A. Sakuma , Phys. Rev. B 73, 172410 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    Komasaki, M

    Y. Komasaki, M. Tsunoda, S. Isogami, M. Takahashi, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07C928 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Tsunoda, Y

    M. Tsunoda, Y. Komasaki, S. Kokado, S. Isogami, C.-C. Chen, and M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Express 2, 083001 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    C. H. Marrows, J. Barker, T. A. Moore, and T. Moorsom, npj Spintronics 2, 12 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Grollier, D

    J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, K. Y. Camsari, K. Everschor -Sitte, S. Fukami, and M. D. Stiles, Nat. Electron. 3, 360 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    B. R. Zink, Y. Lv, D. Lyu, B. Dixit, Y.-C. Chen, S. Rangaprasad, Q. Jia, Y. Yang, and J.- P. Wang, Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 047001 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    J.-Y. Yoon, N. Cacoilo, A. Madhavan, J. J. McClelland, S. Kanai, and H. Ohno, S. Fukami, and W. A. Borders, IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 47, 1482 (2026)

    2026

  44. [52]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Nature 619, 52 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Zhang, H

    D. Zhang, H. Wei, J. Duan, J. Chen, J. Chen, D. Yue, W. Gong, P. Liu, Y. Yang, J. Gou, J. Yan, K. Zhai, P. Wang, S. Hu, Z. Jia, W. Jiang, L. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Li, and Y. Jiang, Nat. Commun. 16, 7047 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    X. Liu, F. Liu, C. Jiang, JMMM. 610, 172585 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Lee, M.-G

    S. Lee, M.-G. Kang, D. Go, D. Kim, J.-H. Kang, T. Lee, G.-H. Lee, J. Kang, N. J. Lee, Y. Mokrousov, S. Kim, and K.-J. Kim, K.-J. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Commun. Phys. 4, 234 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Gupta, C

    R. Gupta, C. Bouard, F. Kammerbauer, J. O. L.-Martin, A. Bose, I. Kononenko, S. Martin, P. Usé, G. Jakob, M. Drouard, and M. Kläui, Nat. Commun. 16, 130 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    Y. Yang, P. Wang, J. Chen, D. Zhang, C. Pan, S. Hu, T. Wang, W. Yue, C. Chen, W. Jiang, L. Zhu, X. Qiu, Y. Yao, Y. Li, W. Wang, and Y. Jiang, Nat. Commun. 15, 8645 (2024). 20

    2024

  50. [58]

    Ding, M.-G

    S. Ding, M.-G. Kang, W. Legrand, and P . Gambardella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236702 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    G. K. Shukla, Y. Miura, M. K. Singh, and S. Isogami, arXiv:2601.01115 (2026)

    2026

  52. [60]

    Nabei, C

    Y. Nabei, C. Yang, H. Sun, H. Jones, T. Mai, T. Wang, R. Bodin, B. Pandey, Z. Wang, Y. Xiong, A. H. Comstock, B. Ewing, J. Bingen, R. Sun, D. Smirnov, W. Zhang, A. Hoffmann, R. Rao, M. Hu, Z. V. Vardeny, B. Yan, X. Li, J. Zhou, J. Liu, D. Sun, Nat. Phys. 22, 245 (2026)

    2026

  53. [61]

    Sakaguchi, S

    H. Sakaguchi, S. Isogami, M. Niimi, and T. Ishibashi, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 56, 365002 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.