Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 148 references

Spin-Consistency Constraints in Noncollinear Tensor TDA

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Reconstructing the exchange-correlation kernel to obey spin-consistency constraints removes spin contamination in open-shell TDDFT, yielding unique spin-adapted excitation energies within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation.

desk verdict Solid, novel spin-consistent kernel reconstruction for tensor TDA; the uniqueness claim is underproven but the stress-test's alternative permutation doesn't hold up — worth serious peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19933 v1 pith:SZ6PEPPI submitted 2026-07-22 physics.chem-ph

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords time-dependentdensityfunctionaltheoryspincontaminationopen-shellsystemsTamm-Dancoffapproximationexchange-correlationkerneltensorzero-excitation-energytheoremspin-flip
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Open-shell TDDFT has long produced spin-contaminated excitation energies because the single-excitation space built on one Kohn-Sham determinant is not spin-complete. This paper shows that, for a doublet reference, the demand that the three spin-projection channels produce a consistent tensor structure reduces, via the zero-excitation-energy theorem, to a set of six constraints on the exchange-correlation kernel. Standard noncollinear functionals violate these constraints; the paper's reconstructed kernel, built from a single spin-unpolarized spin-flip reference kernel, satisfies them by construction and makes spin adaptation a natural consequence. If right, this means open-shell doublets and triplets can be computed with spin-pure excitation energies and without the artifact states that plague spin-flip TDDFT, while also treating ROKS target states in the same framework.

What carries the argument

The zero-excitation-energy theorem identity, 2Fz_pq = Σ_{u∈O} K^SF_{pq,uu}, expresses the spin-dependent Fock matrix through the spin-flip kernel, converting the spin-consistency constraints into kernel-only conditions. The two-step kernel reconstruction then evaluates all kernels at Dz=0 and replaces the antiparallel-spin block by −P̂K^SF (with P̂ the index permutation operator), rebuilding every block from the single reference kernel K^Ref = K^SF(Dz=0). This construction enforces the six constraints by construction and makes all spin channels mutually consistent.

What would settle it

For a test molecule such as O2, compute the 1Σ−u excitation energy with the published reconstruction and with a different index-permutation operator Q that also satisfies constraints (29a–c). If the two agree, spin consistency determines the result; if they differ, the consistency requirements alone do not fix the predictions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For an S=1/2 reference, the spin-tensor construction is overdetermined: the three Sz-adapted TDA blocks must map onto two target-spin sectors, and consistency requires the exchange-correlation kernel to satisfy a specific set of identities (Eqs. 21–26). Because standard functionals fail these identities, the paper proposes a two-step kernel reconstruction—evaluate the kernel at zero spin polarization (Dz=0) and impose the index-permutation replacement K↑↑,↓↓ → −P̂K^SF—so that all kernel blocks descend from one reference kernel. This enforces the constraints exactly, recovering a unique excitation energy expression; for S≥1 it removes artifact states such as the negative 1Σ−u excitation in O2

Load-bearing premise

The kernel reconstruction is imposed, not derived: the particular index-permutation choice K↑↑,↓↓ → −P̂K^SF is one of many ways to satisfy the constraints, and the method's predictive accuracy rests on that choice rather than on spin-consistency alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Doublet radicals: NT-TDA gives spin-pure doublet–doublet excitation energies with accuracy comparable to spin-conserving TDA and noncollinear spin-flip TDA while eliminating spin contamination (mean absolute errors 0.18–0.60 eV across tested functionals).
  • Triplet references: the artifact state responsible for a negative 1Σ−u excitation energy in O2 is removed; the computed value becomes 7.07 eV versus the experimental 6.12 eV.
  • Inverted singlet–triplet gaps: NT-TDA predicts negative E(S1)−E(T1) for all ten triangulene-derived INVEST molecules at B3LYP, with a mean absolute error of 0.06 eV, outperforming spin-conserving TDA and both collinear and noncollinear spin-flip TDA.
  • Fulvene conical intersections: NT-TDA reduces the residual S1/S0 energy splitting at conical-intersection geometries and shows weaker functional dependence than previous spin-adapted spin-flip TDDFT in the tested cases.
  • The reference open-shell OO component in the St=S−1 sector automatically appears as a zero-excitation-energy state and decouples, so no explicit projection is required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The index-permutation reconstruction is one of many possible completions of the constraints; if other completions yield different excitation energies, then spin consistency alone underdetermines NT-TDA and the specific choice is empirical rather than derived.
  • Extending the same kernel reconstruction to include the de-excitation (B) sector could deliver spin-consistent full TDDFT, but the paper notes this is not straightforward, so the current scope is limited to TDA.
  • Evaluating the kernel at Dz=0 while keeping F0 from the polarized ROKS solution is a formally inconsistent combination; the paper's numerical justification (Appendix B) suggests the scheme may be fragile in systems near response instabilities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the tensor TDA formulation for open-shell references from a noncollinear perspective. For an S = 1/2 ROKS reference, the authors derive a set of kernel constraints that must hold for the three ∆Sz channels to yield a spin-consistent St = 1/2 block. Observing that standard noncollinear functionals violate these constraints, they propose a two-step reconstruction: evaluate the kernel at Dz = 0 (Eq. 27) and impose the index-permutation replacement K↑↑,↓↓ → −P̂K^SF (Eq. 30), with all blocks then expressed through a single reference kernel K^Ref. The method is parameter-free, is implemented in the open-source NEST package, and is tested on ethylene torsion, fulvene, doublet radicals, naphthoquinone diradicals, INVEST molecules, and O2. The central claims are that the reconstruction restores spin consistency, eliminates the O2 artifact state, and yields a unique excitation-energy expression for S = 1/2.

Significance. If the uniqueness claim were established, this would be a valuable contribution: a parameter-free, functional-independent route to spin-pure open-shell excitation energies within TDA, unifying spin-conserving and spin-flip channels and removing artifact states. The paper is commendable for its reproducible implementation, open data, and independent benchmarks (QUEST#4, XMS-CASPT2 geometries, CASPT2 gaps). No experimental data are fitted, and the tested predictions are falsifiable. However, the central theoretical claim of uniqueness is not proven: the kernel reconstruction is imposed rather than derived, and the manuscript does not show that spin consistency alone fixes the working equations. The numerical success is real but cannot, by itself, resolve this underdetermination. The contribution is therefore promising but needs a strengthening or reframing of its theoretical claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.4, Eqs. (27)–(32); Abstract and Introduction] The central uniqueness claim is not supported. The reconstruction K↑↑,↓↓ → −P̂K^Ref together with K↑↑,↑↑ = K↓↓,↓↓ = (1−P̂)K^Ref is imposed rather than derived. The residual constraints (29a–c) fix K↑↑,↓↓ only on the index classes (au,bu), (ui,uj), and (au,uj). Consequently, any symmetric homogeneous term H satisfying H_{au,bu}=H_{ui,uj}=H_{au,uj}=0 can be added to both K↑↑,↓↓ and K↑↑,↑↑/K↓↓,↓↓ without violating any of Eqs. (21)–(26). Such a term changes, for example, the CO–CO matrix element in Table 9 (it adds H_{ui,vj} for u≠v), so the resulting excitation energies are not determined by the spin-consistency constraints alone. I note that the specific alternative permutation Q proposed in the stress-test is actually identical to P̂ under the pair-swap symmetry K_{PQ,RS}=K_{RS,PQ}, so that particular counterexample does not land; however, the broader homogeneous ambiguity remains. The Ab
  2. [§2.4, Eq. (27); Appendix B] The first reconstruction step evaluates the kernel at Dz = 0 while retaining the F0 block from the spin-polarized ROKS reference. This mixed evaluation is not derived from the spin-consistency program; it is justified numerically in Appendix B (small effect for NO, stabilization for H), but no formal argument shows that this combination is the unique spin-consistent choice. Since the kernel constraints do not involve F0, this step is an additional, independent ansatz. It should either be accompanied by a principle that selects it (e.g., a well-defined reference-density construction) or be explicitly presented as part of the proposed approximation, with the 'unique' language adjusted accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (9) and (21)] The symbol 'X_{u∈O}' in Eq. (9) appears to be a typographical error for Σ_{u∈O}. More importantly, the derivation of Eq. (21) from Eqs. (20) and (9) is not shown: Eq. (9) gives a sum over the open-shell index, whereas Eq. (21) contains a single K^SF_{uu,ij} term. If an additional symmetry (e.g., degeneracy of open-shell orbitals) is being used, it should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Table S6 and Conclusion] The conclusion states that the scheme 'shows low sensitivity to the choice of functional,' but Table S6 shows MAE values ranging from 0.06 eV (B3LYP) to 0.36 eV (BHHLYP), with BHHLYP giving −0.82 eV for molecule 10 versus the TBE of −0.305 eV. This is a substantial functional dependence and should be described more cautiously.
  3. [Appendix D, Table 10] For O2, NT-TDA gives 7.07 eV for the 1Σ−u state versus the experimental 6.12 eV, an error of 0.95 eV. The text correctly emphasizes the removal of the artifact, but it should not imply that the reconstruction improves quantitative accuracy for this state beyond eliminating the spurious negative root.
  4. [Supporting Information] The placeholder '[URL]' for the Supporting Information should be completed before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ZEET self-citation is a legitimate algebraic dependency and no fitted value is relabeled as a prediction; the main caveat is underdetermination, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation runs from the noncollinear TDA working equation (Eqs. 1–4) to the spin-consistency constraints (Eqs. 21–26) by explicit algebra plus the zero-excitation-energy theorem (Eq. 9). Eq. 9 is cited to the authors' own Ref. 26; it is load-bearing because it eliminates F^z, but it is a parameter-free exact identity for an ROKS reference, not an empirical fit and not the target result, so citing it is legitimate dependency rather than circularity. The two-step kernel reconstruction (Eqs. 27 and 30) is transparently imposed, not derived: the paper says "we impose the index-permutation reconstruction." This makes the scheme an ansatz, and the absence of a uniqueness or optimality argument means the numerical predictions are underdetermined by the spin-consistency constraints alone (an alternative permutation also satisfies Eqs. 21–26). That is a rigor/validity concern, not a circular reduction: the working equations are not equivalent to their inputs by construction, no experimental data are fitted, and the applications are benchmarked against independent TBEs, XMS-CASPT2, and experiment. Therefore no step in the derivation reduces to its own input, and the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on three imported inputs: the authors' own ZEET (Eq. 9), the Clebsch–Gordan/tensor-TDA formalism (Refs. 21,28), and the ROKS high-spin reference. On top of these, two hand-chosen reconstruction steps (Eqs. 27 and 30) carry the burden normally assigned to free parameters; although not empirical, they are arbitrary choices needed for the derivation to close. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Spin-unpolarized kernel evaluation = Dz = 0
    The kernel is evaluated at the spin-unpolarized density (Dz→0) to enforce the spin-degeneracy condition (Eq. 26). This is a hand-chosen modeling step; although motivated by spin-tensor invariance, it is not proven and affects all numerical results (Appendix B).
  • Index-permutation operator P̂ = K↑↑,↓↓ → −P̂ K^SF
    The mixed-spin kernel is reconstructed by permuting the first two indices of the reference spin-flip kernel. This ansatz is imposed to satisfy constraints (29a–c); it is not unique, and no justification is given beyond satisfying the equations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Zero-excitation-energy theorem (Eq. 9): 2F^z_{pq} = Σ_{u∈O} K^SF_{pq,uu} for ROKS references.
    Taken from the authors' prior work (Ref. 26); used to eliminate F^z and derive constraints (21)–(26). If the theorem fails, the constraints and reconstruction collapse. It is not proven in this paper.
  • domain assumption The uncoupled Sz-adapted excitation space decomposes into target-spin sectors via Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, and the tensor TDA Hamiltonian blocks transform accordingly (Section 2.2, Appendix A).
    Adopted from Refs. 21,28. This gives the core relations like Eq. (17) and (18) used to derive the constraints. The method inherits this framework.
  • domain assumption The reference is a high-spin ROKS determinant with open-shell orbitals occupied by spin-up electrons; the collinear reference is valid even where UKS solutions break symmetry (Section 2.1).
    The formalism builds on ROKS, not UKS. The choice of ROKS avoids symmetry-broken solutions but also means the reference does not satisfy all Brillouin conditions (as the paper notes in Section 2.4), which is handled via the CV couplings.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic TDA and the multicollinear noncollinear spin-flip kernel evaluation (Refs. 8,9,26) are valid for the excited-state calculations.
    The method is restricted to TDA; the kernel is evaluated from the ground-state functional. Standard practice, but an assumption for the linear-response framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-Consistency Constraints in Noncollinear Tensor TDA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZ6PEPPI

@misc{pith2026260719933,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-Consistency Constraints in Noncollinear Tensor TDA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZ6PEPPI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19933}
}
read the original abstract

TDDFT for open-shell systems, whether spin-conserving or spin-flip, has long suffered from spin contamination. This problem arises because the single-excitation space built upon a single Kohn-Sham determinant is not spin-complete. Adopting spin tensor reference states therefore offers an elegant and promising route to resolving this issue. In this work, we revisit the tensor TDDFT equations within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA) from a noncollinear perspective. We show that, for S = 1/2 reference states, the internal consistency of the spin tensor formulation can, with the aid of the zero-excitation-energy theorem, be recast as a set of constraints that the exchange-correlation kernel must satisfy. Standard noncollinear functionals, however, generally fail to meet these constraints. To address this, we propose a kernel reconstruction scheme that is independent of the specific functional form and free of empirical parameters. This scheme enforces the required constraints, restoring internal consistency in the full spin tensor structure, with spin adaptation following as a natural consequence. Furthermore, when extended to tensor reference states with other values of S, such as S = 1 for the oxygen molecule, the scheme eliminates the so-called artifact states, namely solutions with severely underestimated excitation energies. In addition, the scheme allows the target states that ROKS reference states aim to describe to be expressed and computed, at the TDA level, within the same unified framework as other states, a capability that spin-adapted spin-conserving TDDFT has so far lacked.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19933 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the uncoupled Sz-adapted states for the C-to-O (CO) excitation on a triplet reference. A key point we wish to emphasize is that the status of this transformation depends critically on the spin of the reference, as summarized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Transformation between Sz-adapted and St-adapted TDA Hamiltonian blocks. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the uncoupled Sz-adapted states for the CO excitation on a doublet reference. Equation (21) is the CO–CO consistency condition. Among the 16 blocks of the A matrix generated by the four excitation classes CO, CV, OO, and OV, only 10 are independent after hermiticity is taken into account. The OO excitation space is already spin complete; there￾fore, after applying the zero excitation energy… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Torsional potential energy curves of ethylene calculated using collinear spin-flip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of calculated singlet–triplet energy gaps ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1964 , journal =

    Inhomogeneous Electron Gas , author =. 1964 , journal =

  2. [2]

    Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =

  3. [3]

    WIREs Comput

    From Collinear to Noncollinear Spin Density Functionals: The Multicollinear Approach , author =. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. , volume =. doi:10.1002/wcms.70063 , copyright =

  4. [4]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Random Phase Approximation and Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. I. Theory , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  5. [5]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. II. Theory and Pilot Application , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  6. [6]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. III. An Even Better and Simpler Formulation , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  7. [7]

    Zero Excitation Energy Theorem and the Spin-Flip Kernel , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  8. [8]

    Spin-Adapted Spin-Flip-down Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

Show all 148 references
  1. [9]

    Relativistic Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Using Hybrid Functionals and Noncollinear Spin Magnetization , author =. Int. J. Quantum Chem. , volume =. doi:10.1002/qua.22065 , copyright =

  2. [10]

    On the Challenge to Improve the Density Response with Unusual Gradient Approximations , author =. Eur. Phys. J. B , volume =

  3. [11]

    Many Recent Density Functionals Are Numerically Ill-Behaved , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  4. [12]

    Reproducibility of Density Functional Approximations: How New Functionals Should Be Reported , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  5. [13]

    1984 , journal =

    Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems , author =. 1984 , journal =

  6. [14]

    , editor =

    Casida, Mark E. , editor =. Time-Dependent Density Functional Response Theory for Molecules , booktitle =. 1995 , volume =

  7. [15]

    Single-Reference Ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules , author =. Chem. Rev. , volume =

  8. [16]

    , title =

    Ullrich, Carsten A. , title =. 2012 , pages =

  9. [17]

    2003 , journal =

    The Spin--Flip Approach within Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: Theory and Applications to Diradicals , author =. 2003 , journal =

  10. [18]

    Doublet-Quartet Transitions , author =

    Critical Assessment of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: II. Doublet-Quartet Transitions , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  11. [19]

    Doublet--Doublet Transitions , author =

    Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I. Doublet--Doublet Transitions , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  12. [20]

    Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals? , author =. Chem. Rev. , volume =

  13. [21]

    Performance of the Spin-Flip and Multireference Methods for Bond Breaking in Hydrocarbons:\, A Benchmark Study , author =. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume =

  14. [22]

    Addressing the High-Throughput Screening Challenges of Inverted Singlet--Triplet Materials by MRSF-TDDFT , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  15. [23]

    Inverted Singlet--Triplet Gaps and Their Relevance to Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence , author =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , volume =

  16. [24]

    A Spin-Complete Version of the Spin-Flip Approach to Bond Breaking: What Is the Impact of Obtaining Spin Eigenfunctions? , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  17. [25]

    The Spin-Flip Extended Single Excitation Configuration Interaction Method , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  18. [26]

    On the Nature of Electronic Transitions in Radicals:\, An Extended Single Excitation Configuration Interaction Method , author =. J. Phys. Chem. , volume =

  19. [27]

    Propagator Corrections to Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory Linear Response Theory , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  20. [28]

    Optimizing Conical Intersections by Spin-Flip Density Functional Theory: Application to Ethylene , author =. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume =

  21. [29]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Spin-Flip Time Dependent Density Functional Theory Applied to Excited States with Single, Double, or Mixed Electron Excitation Character , author =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

  22. [30]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: Towards a Simple and Accurate Method for Spin-Flip-down Excitations , author =. Mol. Phys. , volume =

  23. [31]

    Spin-Flip, Tensor Equation-of-Motion Configuration Interaction with a Density-Functional Correction: A Spin-Complete Method for Exploring Excited-State Potential Energy Surfaces , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  24. [32]

    Eliminating Spin-Contamination of Spin-Flip Time Dependent Density Functional Theory within Linear Response Formalism by the Use of Zeroth-Order Mixed-Reference (MR) Reduced Density Matrix , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  25. [33]

    Investigating the Effects of Electron Correlation and Methylation on the S1/S0 Conical Intersection Seam of Fulvene , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  26. [34]

    OpenQP: A Quantum Chemical Platform Featuring MRSF-TDDFT with an Emphasis on Open-Source Ecosystem , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  27. [35]

    2026 , url =

    OpenQP , howpublished =. 2026 , url =

  28. [36]

    Nonadiabatic Dynamics of the Molecular Tully Models with the Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory , author =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , volume =

  29. [37]

    and Wang, Xue-Bin and Borden, Weston Thatcher , year = 2018, journal =

    Hrovat, David A. and Wang, Xue-Bin and Borden, Weston Thatcher , year = 2018, journal =. Calculations of the Relative Energies of the Low-Lying Electronic States of 2,7-Naphthoquinodimethane and 2,7-Naphthoquinone. Substitution of Oxygen for CH2 Is Predicted to Increase the Si...

  30. [38]

    Calculations on 1,8-Naphthoquinone Predict That the Ground State of This Diradical Is a Singlet , author =. J. Comput. Chem. , volume =. doi:10.1002/jcc.25551 , copyright =

  31. [39]

    Negative Ion Photoelectron Spectroscopy Confirms the Prediction of the Relative Energies of the Low-Lying Electronic States of 2,7-Naphthoquinone , author =. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume =

  32. [40]

    Negative Ion Photoelectron Spectroscopy Confirms the Prediction of a Singlet Ground State for the 1,8-Naphthoquinone Diradical , author =. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume =

  33. [41]

    Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density Functional Methods for Excited State Properties , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  34. [42]

    Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Gradients in the Amsterdam Density Functional Package: Geometry Optimizations of Spin-Flip Excitations , author =. Theor. Chem. Acc. , volume =

  35. [43]

    Analytic Energy Gradients of Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  36. [44]

    NAC-TDDFT: Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Nonadiabatic Couplings , author =. Acc. Chem. Res. , volume =

  37. [45]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.26594 , archiveprefix =

    Analytic First Order Nonadiabatic Coupling Matrix Elements of Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.26594 , archiveprefix =. 2605.26594 , primaryclass =

  38. [46]

    Restricted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory with Perturbative Spin--Orbit Coupling: Inclusion of Spin-Flip-down States , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  39. [47]

    Combining Spin-Adapted Open-Shell TD-DFT with Spin--Orbit Coupling , author =. Mol. Phys. , volume =

  40. [48]

    Noncollinear and Spin-Flip TDDFT in Multicollinear Approach , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  41. [49]

    Analytic Gradient for Spin-Flip TDDFT Using Noncollinear Functionals in the Multicollinear Approach , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  42. [50]

    Spin-Flip Configuration Interaction Singles with Exact Spin-Projection: Theory and Applications to Strongly Correlated Systems , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  43. [51]

    Time-Dependent Projected Hartree-Fock , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  44. [52]

    Tensor Equations of Motion for the Excitations of Rotationally Invariant or Charge-Independent Systems , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =

  45. [53]

    General SCF Operator Satisfying Correct Variational Condition , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  46. [54]

    WIREs Comput

    QUESTDB: A Database of Highly Accurate Excitation Energies for the Electronic Structure Community , author =. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. , volume =. doi:10.1002/wcms.1517 , copyright =

  47. [55]

    Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Method with Double Electron-Attaching Operators: Theory, Implementation, and Benchmarks , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  48. [56]

    Size-Consistent Wave Functions for Bond-Breaking: The Equation-of-Motion Spin-Flip Model , author =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , volume =

  49. [57]

    Analytic Nonadiabatic Derivative Couplings Using Noncollinear Spin-Flip TDDFT , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  50. [58]

    Noncollinear Spin-Flip TDDFT for Potential Energy Surface Crossings: Conical Intersections and Spin Crossings , author =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =

  51. [59]

    New Implementation of Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory and Application to Molecules with Variable Diradical Character and Conical Intersections , author =

  52. [60]

    The Simplest Possible Approach for Simulating S0--S1 Conical Intersections with DFT/TDDFT: Adding One Doubly Excited Configuration , author =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , volume =

  53. [61]

    Heptazine, Cyclazine, and Related Compounds: Chemically-Accurate Estimates of the Inverted Singlet--Triplet Gap , author =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , volume =

  54. [62]

    2026 , url =

    NEST (Noncollinear Electronic Structure Theory) , howpublished =. 2026 , url =

  55. [63]

    WIREs Comput

    PySCF: The Python-Based Simulations of Chemistry Framework , author =. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. , volume =. doi:10.1002/wcms.1340 , copyright =

  56. [64]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.14155 , archiveprefix =

    The Python Simulations of Chemistry Framework: 10 Years of an Open-Source Quantum Chemistry Project , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.14155 , archiveprefix =. 2603.14155 , primaryclass =

  57. [65]

    1988 , journal =

    Density-Functional Exchange-Energy Approximation with Correct Asymptotic Behavior , author =. 1988 , journal =

  58. [66]

    , year =

    Lee, Chengteh and Yang, Weitao and Parr, Robert G. , year =. Development of the. Phys. Rev. B , volume =

  59. [67]

    The M06 Suite of Density Functionals for Main Group Thermochemistry, Thermochemical Kinetics, Noncovalent Interactions, Excited States, and Transition Elements: Two New Functionals and Systematic Testing of Four M06-Class Functionals and 12 Other Functionals , author =. Theor....

  60. [68]

    2004 , journal =

    A New Hybrid Exchange--Correlation Functional Using the Coulomb-Attenuating Method (CAM-B3LYP) , author =. 2004 , journal =

  61. [69]

    J Phys Chem , volume =

    Ab Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Density Functional Force Fields , author =. J Phys Chem , volume =

  62. [70]

    A New Mixing of Hartree--Fock and Local Density-functional Theories , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  63. [71]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =

  64. [72]

    Toward Reliable Density Functional Methods without Adjustable Parameters: The

    Adamo, Carlo and Barone, Vincenzo , year =. Toward Reliable Density Functional Methods without Adjustable Parameters: The. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  65. [73]

    Dirac, P. A. M. , year =. Note on Exchange Phenomena in the. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. , volume =

  66. [74]

    1980 , journal =

    Accurate Spin-Dependent Electron Liquid Correlation Energies for Local Spin Density Calculations: A Critical Analysis , author =. 1980 , journal =

  67. [75]

    2003 , journal =

    Climbing the Density Functional Ladder: Nonempirical Meta--Generalized Gradient Approximation Designed for Molecules and Solids , author =. 2003 , journal =

  68. [76]

    , year =

    Dunning, Jr., Thom H. , year =. Gaussian Basis Sets for Use in Correlated Molecular Calculations. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  69. [77]

    Systematic Basis Sets and Wave Functions , author =

    Electron Affinities of the First-row Atoms Revisited. Systematic Basis Sets and Wave Functions , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  70. [78]

    Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy , author =. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , volume =

  71. [79]

    Inhomogeneous Electron Gas

    Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864--B871

  72. [80]

    Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133--A1138

  73. [81]

    Runge, E.; Gross, E. K. U. Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 997--1000

  74. [82]

    Casida, M. E. In Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods ; Chong, Delano P , Ed.; World Scientific, 1995; Vol. Volume 1; pp 155--192

  75. [83]

    Ullrich, C. A. Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory: Concepts and Applications ; Oxford University Press, 2012; pp 439--444

  76. [84]

    Shao, Y.; Head-Gordon , M.; Krylov, A. I. The Spin--Flip Approach within Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: Theory and Applications to Diradicals. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 4807--4818

  77. [85]

    Single-Reference Ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules

    Dreuw, A.; Head-Gordon , M. Single-Reference Ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4009--4037

  78. [86]

    Q.; Xiao, Y

    Li, H.; Pu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Gao, Y. Q.; Xiao, Y. Noncollinear and Spin-Flip TDDFT in Multicollinear Approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 2270--2281

  79. [87]

    Q.; Xiao, Y

    Li, H.; Sun, Q.; Gao, Y. Q.; Xiao, Y. Analytic Gradient for Spin-Flip TDDFT Using Noncollinear Functionals in the Multicollinear Approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2025, 21, 3010--3031

  80. [88]

    Critical Assessment of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: II

    Li, Z.; Liu, W. Critical Assessment of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: II. Doublet-Quartet Transitions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 2517--2527

  81. [89]

    Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I

    Li, Z.; Liu, W. Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I. Doublet--Doublet Transitions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 238--260

  82. [90]

    Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals? Chem

    Stuyver, T.; Chen, B.; Zeng, T.; Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F.; Hoffmann, R. Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals? Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 11291--11351

  83. [91]

    A.; Nemukhin, A

    Golubeva, A. A.; Nemukhin, A. V.; Klippenstein, S. J.; Harding, L. B.; Krylov, A. I. Performance of the Spin-Flip and Multireference Methods for Bond Breaking in Hydrocarbons:\, A Benchmark Study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 13264--13271

  84. [92]

    Inverted Singlet--Triplet Gaps and Their Relevance to Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence

    de Silva , P. Inverted Singlet--Triplet Gaps and Their Relevance to Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 5674--5679

  85. [93]

    Spin-Flip Time Dependent Density Functional Theory Applied to Excited States with Single, Double, or Mixed Electron Excitation Character

    Rinkevicius, Z.; Vahtras, O.; gren, H. Spin-Flip Time Dependent Density Functional Theory Applied to Excited States with Single, Double, or Mixed Electron Excitation Character. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 133, 114104

  86. [94]

    Minezawa, N.; Gordon, M. S. Optimizing Conical Intersections by Spin-Flip Density Functional Theory: Application to Ethylene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 12749--12753

  87. [95]

    S.; Sherrill, C

    Sears, J. S.; Sherrill, C. D.; Krylov, A. I. A Spin-Complete Version of the Spin-Flip Approach to Bond Breaking: What Is the Impact of Obtaining Spin Eigenfunctions? J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 9084--9094

  88. [96]

    On the Nature of Electronic Transitions in Radicals:\, An Extended Single Excitation Configuration Interaction Method

    Maurice, D.; Head-Gordon , M. On the Nature of Electronic Transitions in Radicals:\, An Extended Single Excitation Configuration Interaction Method. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 6131--6137

  89. [97]

    The Spin-Flip Extended Single Excitation Configuration Interaction Method

    Casanova, D.; Head-Gordon , M. The Spin-Flip Extended Single Excitation Configuration Interaction Method. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 064104

  90. [98]

    J.; Ngo-Trong , C

    Rowe, D. J.; Ngo-Trong , C. Tensor Equations of Motion for the Excitations of Rotationally Invariant or Charge-Independent Systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1975, 47, 471--485

  91. [99]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Random Phase Approximation and Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Li, Z.; Liu, W. Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Random Phase Approximation and Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. I. Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 064106

  92. [100]

    Zhang, X.; Herbert, J. M. Spin-Flip, Tensor Equation-of-Motion Configuration Interaction with a Density-Functional Correction: A Spin-Complete Method for Exploring Excited-State Potential Energy Surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 234107

  93. [101]

    S.; Visscher, L

    Chibueze, C. S.; Visscher, L. Spin-Adapted Spin-Flip-down Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 163, 094111

  94. [102]

    Casida, M. E. Propagator Corrections to Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory Linear Response Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 054111

  95. [103]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Li, Z.; Liu, W. Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. III. An Even Better and Simpler Formulation. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 194106

  96. [104]

    Q.; Xiao, Y

    Wang, T.; Li, H.; Gao, Y. Q.; Xiao, Y. Zero Excitation Energy Theorem and the Spin-Flip Kernel. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2025, 21, 6905--6921

  97. [105]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: Towards a Simple and Accurate Method for Spin-Flip-down Excitations

    Zhao, H.; Li, Z. Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: Towards a Simple and Accurate Method for Spin-Flip-down Excitations. Mol. Phys. 2026, 0, e2631735

  98. [106]

    Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Li, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Suo, B. Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. II. Theory and Pilot Application. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 134101

  99. [107]

    Bast, R.; Jensen, H. J. A.; Saue, T. Relativistic Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Using Hybrid Functionals and Noncollinear Spin Magnetization. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2009, 109, 2091--2112

  100. [108]

    General SCF Operator Satisfying Correct Variational Condition

    Hirao, K.; Nakatsuji, H. General SCF Operator Satisfying Correct Variational Condition. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 1457--1462

  101. [109]

    GitHub repository, 2026; https://github.com/NonDFT/NEST, accessed 2026-07-15

    NonDFT NEST (Noncollinear Electronic Structure Theory). GitHub repository, 2026; https://github.com/NonDFT/NEST, accessed 2026-07-15

  102. [110]

    C.; Blunt, N

    Sun, Q.; Berkelbach, T. C.; Blunt, N. S.; Booth, G. H.; Guo, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; McClain, J. D.; Sayfutyarova, E. R.; Sharma, S.; Wouters, S.; Chan, G. K.-L. PySCF: The Python-Based Simulations of Chemistry Framework. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1340

  103. [111]

    R.; Wu, X.; Zhai, H.; Zhang, X.; Ahmed, A

    Sun, Q.; Hermes, M. R.; Wu, X.; Zhai, H.; Zhang, X.; Ahmed, A. M.; Aucar, J. J.; Backhouse, O. J.; Banerjee, S.; Bao, P.; Bogdanov, N. A.; Bystrom, K.; Chapoton, F.; Chen, N.-Y.; Chernyshov, I. Y.; Clifford, H. S.; Cohen-Janes , S.; Cui, Z.-H.; Damour, Y. D.; Dattani, N.; Ditt...

  104. [112]

    Teh, H.-H.; Subotnik, J. E. The Simplest Possible Approach for Simulating S0--S1 Conical Intersections with DFT/TDDFT: Adding One Doubly Excited Configuration. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 3426--3432

  105. [113]

    Q.; Xiao, Y

    Zhang, X.; Wang, T.; Gao, Y. Q.; Xiao, Y. Noncollinear Spin-Flip TDDFT for Potential Energy Surface Crossings: Conical Intersections and Spin Crossings. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2025, 21, 11550--11561

  106. [114]

    Chakraborty, A.; Pei, Z.; Shao, Y.; Krylov, A. I. New Implementation of Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory and Application to Molecules with Variable Diradical Character and Conical Intersections. ChemRxiv preprint, DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.150025...

  107. [115]

    Becke, A. D. Density-Functional Exchange-Energy Approximation with Correct Asymptotic Behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098--3100

  108. [116]

    Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785--789

  109. [117]

    Q.; Xiao, Y

    Jing, Y.; Qin, W.; Fan, C.; Wang, T.; Pu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Gao, Y. Q.; Xiao, Y. Analytic Nonadiabatic Derivative Couplings Using Noncollinear Spin-Flip TDDFT. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2026, 22, 6076--6092

  110. [118]

    Krylov, A. I. Size-Consistent Wave Functions for Bond-Breaking: The Equation-of-Motion Spin-Flip Model. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 338, 375--384

  111. [119]

    Dunning, T. H., Jr. Gaussian Basis Sets for Use in Correlated Molecular Calculations. I . T he Atoms Boron through Neon and Hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007--1023

  112. [120]

    A.; Dunning, T

    Kendall, R. A.; Dunning, T. H., Jr.; Harrison, R. J. Electron Affinities of the First-row Atoms Revisited. Systematic Basis Sets and Wave Functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 6796--6806

  113. [121]

    Nonadiabatic Dynamics of the Molecular Tully Models with the Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Huang, H.; Zhang, J.; Hu, D.; Liu, Y.-J. Nonadiabatic Dynamics of the Molecular Tully Models with the Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025, 16, 13038--13045

  114. [122]

    Segarra-Mart \'i , J.; Bearpark, M. J. Investigating the Effects of Electron Correlation and Methylation on the S1/S0 Conical Intersection Seam of Fulvene. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2026, 22, 477--487

  115. [123]

    Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy

    Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297--3305

  116. [124]

    J.; Devlin, F

    Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. Ab Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Density Functional Force Fields. J Phys Chem 1994, 98, 11623--11627

  117. [125]

    Becke, A. D. A New Mixing of Hartree--Fock and Local Density-functional Theories. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372--1377

  118. [126]

    P.; Handy, N

    Yanai, T.; Tew, D. P.; Handy, N. C. A New Hybrid Exchange--Correlation Functional Using the Coulomb-Attenuating Method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 51--57

  119. [127]

    Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. The M06 Suite of Density Functionals for Main Group Thermochemistry, Thermochemical Kinetics, Noncovalent Interactions, Excited States, and Transition Elements: Two New Functionals and Systematic Testing of Four M06-Class Functionals and 12 Other Funct...

  120. [128]

    Mironov, V.; Komarov, K.; Li, J.; Gerasimov, I.; Nakata, H.; Mazaherifar, M.; Ishimura, K.; Park, W.; Lashkaripour, A.; Oh, M.; Huix-Rotllant , M.; Lee, S.; Choi, C. H. OpenQP: A Quantum Chemical Platform Featuring MRSF-TDDFT with an Emphasis on Open-Source Ecosystem. J. Chem....

  121. [129]

    GitHub repository, 2026; https://github.com/Open-Quantum-Platform/openqp, accessed 2026-05-29

    Open-Quantum-Platform OpenQP. GitHub repository, 2026; https://github.com/Open-Quantum-Platform/openqp, accessed 2026-05-29

  122. [130]

    QUESTDB: A Database of Highly Accurate Excitation Energies for the Electronic Structure Community

    V \'e ril, M.; Scemama, A.; Caffarel, M.; Lipparini, F.; Boggio-Pasqua , M.; Jacquemin, D.; Loos, P.-F. QUESTDB: A Database of Highly Accurate Excitation Energies for the Electronic Structure Community. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2021, 11, e1517

  123. [131]

    Toward Reliable Density Functional Methods without Adjustable Parameters: The PBE0 Model

    Adamo, C.; Barone, V. Toward Reliable Density Functional Methods without Adjustable Parameters: The PBE0 Model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158--6170

  124. [132]

    P.; Staroverov, V

    Tao, J.; Perdew, J. P.; Staroverov, V. N.; Scuseria, G. E. Climbing the Density Functional Ladder: Nonempirical Meta--Generalized Gradient Approximation Designed for Molecules and Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 146401

  125. [133]

    A.; Hou, G.-L.; Borden, W

    Yang, Z.; Hrovat, D. A.; Hou, G.-L.; Borden, W. T.; Wang, X.-B. Negative Ion Photoelectron Spectroscopy Confirms the Prediction of the Relative Energies of the Low-Lying Electronic States of 2,7-Naphthoquinone. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 4838--4844

  126. [134]

    A.; Hou, G.-L.; Borden, W

    Yang, Z.; Hrovat, D. A.; Hou, G.-L.; Borden, W. T.; Wang, X.-B. Negative Ion Photoelectron Spectroscopy Confirms the Prediction of a Singlet Ground State for the 1,8-Naphthoquinone Diradical. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 3142--3148

  127. [135]

    A.; Wang, X.-B.; Borden, W

    Hrovat, D. A.; Wang, X.-B.; Borden, W. T. Calculations of the Relative Energies of the Low-Lying Electronic States of 2,7-Naphthoquinodimethane and 2,7-Naphthoquinone. Substitution of Oxygen for CH2 Is Predicted to Increase the Singlet-Triplet Energy Difference ( EST). J. Phys...

  128. [136]

    A.; Wang, X.-B.; Borden, W

    Hrovat, D. A.; Wang, X.-B.; Borden, W. T. Calculations on 1,8-Naphthoquinone Predict That the Ground State of This Diradical Is a Singlet. J. Comput. Chem. 2019, 40, 119--126

  129. [137]

    Dirac, P. A. M. Note on Exchange Phenomena in the Thomas Atom. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 1930, 26, 376--385

  130. [138]

    H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M

    Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Accurate Spin-Dependent Electron Liquid Correlation Energies for Local Spin Density Calculations: A Critical Analysis. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200--1211

  131. [139]

    P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865--3868

  132. [140]

    Heptazine, Cyclazine, and Related Compounds: Chemically-Accurate Estimates of the Inverted Singlet--Triplet Gap

    Loos, P.-F.; Lipparini, F.; Jacquemin, D. Heptazine, Cyclazine, and Related Compounds: Chemically-Accurate Estimates of the Inverted Singlet--Triplet Gap. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 11069--11075

  133. [141]

    Lashkaripour, A.; Park, W.; Mazaherifar, M.; Choi, C. H. Addressing the High-Throughput Screening Challenges of Inverted Singlet--Triplet Materials by MRSF-TDDFT. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2025, 21, 5661--5668

  134. [142]

    Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density Functional Methods for Excited State Properties

    Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Adiabatic Time-Dependent Density Functional Methods for Excited State Properties. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 7433--7447

  135. [143]

    Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Gradients in the Amsterdam Density Functional Package: Geometry Optimizations of Spin-Flip Excitations

    Seth, M.; Mazur, G.; Ziegler, T. Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Gradients in the Amsterdam Density Functional Package: Geometry Optimizations of Spin-Flip Excitations. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2011, 129, 331--342

  136. [144]

    Analytic Energy Gradients of Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W. Analytic Energy Gradients of Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 164109

  137. [145]

    NAC-TDDFT: Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Nonadiabatic Couplings

    Wang, Z.; Wu, C.; Liu, W. NAC-TDDFT: Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Nonadiabatic Couplings. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 3288--3297

  138. [146]

    Analytic First Order Nonadiabatic Coupling Matrix Elements of Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, W. Analytic First Order Nonadiabatic Coupling Matrix Elements of Spin-Adapted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.26594, 2026

  139. [147]

    Combining Spin-Adapted Open-Shell TD-DFT with Spin--Orbit Coupling

    Li, Z.; Suo, B.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, W. Combining Spin-Adapted Open-Shell TD-DFT with Spin--Orbit Coupling. Mol. Phys. 2013, 111, 3741--3755

  140. [148]

    S.; Visscher, L

    Chibueze, C. S.; Visscher, L. Restricted Open-Shell Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory with Perturbative Spin--Orbit Coupling: Inclusion of Spin-Flip-down States. J. Chem. Phys. 2026, 164, 024101 mcitethebibliography

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.