Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 29 references

GaussianSeed: Hierarchical Gaussian Seeding for High-Resolution 3D Occupancy Prediction

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A coarse-to-fine hierarchy of Gaussian primitives lets camera-only occupancy prediction scale to 0.1m resolution at real-time speeds.

desk verdict Solid, clearly written sparse-occupancy paper with a credible Occ3D result and a promising hierarchical Gaussian scheme, but the 0.1 m dataset claim is under-supported by the annotation pipeline and a single-baseline evaluation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20071 v2 pith:LM7HHBIY submitted 2026-07-22 cs.CV

Xinzhuo Li , Xianghui Pan , Jiayuan Du , Wei Wei , Liuyi Wang , Chengju Liu , Qijun Chen This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 3DoccupancypredictionGaussianprimitivescoarse-to-finehierarchysparserepresentationcamera-onlyperceptionhigh-resolutionvoxelsreal-timeinferenceTJScenesdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

GaussianSeed aims to make high-resolution 3D occupancy prediction practical for vision-only systems. The paper argues that dense voxel grids and existing sparse schemes hit memory and compute walls as resolution increases, while a representation built from 3D Gaussian primitives organized in a coarse-to-fine hierarchy breaks that bottleneck. It reports that this hierarchy—where each query starts with one Gaussian and splits into finer offspring across decoder layers—scales to 0.1m resolution, reaching 34.12% mIoU at 41.2ms on Occ3D-nuScenes and, on the new TJScenes dataset, 12.37% mIoU at 66.7ms versus 7.87% at 97.8ms for a point-set baseline. The paper also introduces TJScenes, a six-camera, 0.1m-annotated dataset of off-road and sidewalk scenes, to stress-test high-resolution geometry. If right, the work provides a practical path to fine-grained scene geometry for autonomous driving and mobile robotics at real-time latency.

What carries the argument

The central object is the semantic 3D Gaussian primitive, parameterized by mean, scale, rotation quaternion, opacity, and semantic logit. Occupancy is computed by probabilistic accumulation: each voxel's occupancy is one minus the product of complement probabilities of intersecting Gaussians (Eq. 2), and semantics are opacity-weighted mixtures of Gaussian densities (Eq. 3). Three mechanisms carry the argument: Regression-Based Gaussian Initialization (RBGI) supervises Gaussian center positions with bidirectional Chamfer distance, anchoring primitives to valid geometry without depth priors; Hierarchical Gaussian Seed Devolution (HGSD) starts each query as one Gaussian and splits it into finer

What would settle it

Annotate a subset of TJScenes scenes manually (or with a dense multi-sensor reconstruction) at 0.1m and re-evaluate GaussianSeed and the point-set baseline. If the reported 12.37% vs 7.87% gap narrows substantially when labels are filled to complete surfaces, the high-resolution accuracy claim likely reflects label sparsity rather than geometric fidelity. Alternatively, measure the fraction of ground-truth occupied voxels that are isolated single-voxel hits, which would indicate that labels are sparse LiDAR points rather than dense surfaces.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

GaussianSeed's central claim is that fully sparse 3D Gaussian primitives, when seeded coarsely and progressively devolved to finer Gaussians across decoder layers, can represent occupancy at 0.1m resolution without the memory explosion of dense grids. The framework is camera-only and end-to-end: regression-based initialization anchors each Gaussian center near geometry via Chamfer-distance supervision, without depth priors; the hierarchical devolution propagates from one coarse Gaussian per query to multiple fine ellipsoids; and a parameter encoder passes previous-layer attributes into later queries for stable refinement. The rendered Gaussians are supervised per layer against dense occupanc

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the 0.1m TJScenes ground-truth voxels, derived from LiDAR scans, are complete and accurate enough to supervise and evaluate dense occupancy; the paper gives no annotation pipeline, point-density figures, or hole-filling protocol.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, camera-only systems can predict occupancy at 0.1m resolution in real time (roughly 40–70ms), enabling planning to see curbs, cones, and small obstacles.
  • The hierarchical representation offers an interpretable coarse-to-fine geometry: early layers produce a structural skeleton and later layers add fine ellipsoids, which could help debugging and downstream planning.
  • The sparse Gaussian formulation avoids the memory explosion that blocks dense baselines at 0.1m, extending the practical resolution frontier of occupancy prediction.
  • The new TJScenes benchmark provides a challenging 0.1m, six-camera testbed for off-road, sidewalk, and campus navigation, complementing road-centric benchmarks.
  • The method's end-to-end camera-only training (no depth or LiDAR priors) means it can be applied to novel camera rigs and datasets more easily than approaches that rely on LSS-based initialization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coarse-to-fine curriculum is what makes training stable and fast, a natural extension is even finer resolution (0.05m) or continuous scale adaptation per region, which the hierarchy could support with minimal added cost.
  • The reported advantage over point-set methods on dynamic objects is attributed to anisotropic Gaussian shapes; this suggests a general design principle for sparse dense-prediction tasks: let primitives adapt their extent and orientation rather than use fixed-size points.
  • The 0.1m TJScenes result depends on the completeness of LiDAR-derived labels; if the ground truth is sparse points rather than filled surfaces, the mIoU numbers may partly reflect how well each method matches sensor hits, not true geometry. An independent check of label density would settle this.
  • The Chamfer-distance position loss, which pulls Gaussian centers to voxel-cluster centroids, might be replaceable by a surface-aware distance that uses label confidence; this could test whether position regularization or the Gaussian rendering is the main contributor to accuracy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. GaussianSeed proposes a sparse, hierarchical 3D Gaussian representation for vision-centric occupancy prediction. Queries are initialized by regression, then refined through coarse-to-fine 'seed devolution' across decoder layers, with a Gaussian Parameter Encoder propagating information between layers. Gaussians are rendered into voxel occupancy via a probabilistic superposition and trained with NLL, Lovasz, BCE, and Chamfer losses. The paper also introduces TJScenes, a 0.1 m resolution six-camera occupancy dataset built from Livox Mid-360 LiDAR. On Occ3D-nuScenes, GaussianSeed reports 34.12% mIoU at 41.2 ms, the best accuracy and lowest latency among the fully sparse baselines compared. On TJScenes at 0.1 m, it reports 12.37% mIoU at 66.7 ms versus OPUS's 7.87% at 97.8 ms. Ablations show that both HGSD and GSPE contribute gains on both benchmarks.

Significance. If the high-resolution results are trustworthy, the paper makes a useful contribution: it shows that a sparse Gaussian representation can avoid dense memory scaling and reach 0.1 m voxel resolution with competitive accuracy and latency. The method is clearly specified, the Occ3D sparse-method comparison uses the same backbone and image size, and the architecture ablations are internally consistent. The central claim, however, rests heavily on the new TJScenes benchmark, whose annotation protocol and quality are not documented. The significance is therefore conditional on the dataset being a valid, complete 0.1 m occupancy ground truth.

major comments (3)
  1. [TJScenes Dataset section; Table 2] The 0.1 m ground-truth labels are described only as 'high-quality 3D semantic occupancy annotations, derived from Livox Mid-360 LiDAR scans.' No annotation pipeline, LiDAR point density, registration procedure, hole-filling/cleaning protocol, or independent quality check is given. A single Livox Mid-360 scan has angular resolution that at 10-20 m is comparable to or coarser than 0.1 m, so voxel labels produced by projection or dilation are likely sparse surface shells. Against such labels, GaussianSeed's anisotropic Gaussians can be shaped to hug the shell, while OPUS's discrete point queries may be penalized for filling possibly unobserved interior or adjacent voxels. The reported 12.37% vs. 7.87% gap in Table 2 may therefore reflect label incompleteness rather than superior geometric fidelity. The authors must document the annotation pipeline, report completeness versus distance and pe
  2. [TJScenes Dataset section; Experiments; Tables 1-3] The dataset section states only that TJScenes has 7 scenes and 27,911 annotated samples; it does not specify the train/validation/test scene split or the number of samples in each. Without a fixed split, the TJScenes results cannot be reproduced or compared by other groups, and the possibility of selection bias in choosing evaluation scenes cannot be ruled out. In addition, all results in Tables 1-3 are single runs with no error bars. The Occ3D sparse-method margin (34.12% vs. 33.27%) is small enough that run-to-run variation could change the ranking. Please provide the exact split and report mean and standard deviation over at least three seeds, or otherwise justify why single-run results are reliable.
  3. [Method; Table 2] The paper claims to 'circumvent the memory bottlenecks inherent in dense representations' and scale to 0.1 m, but it does not describe how the Gaussian-to-voxel rendering is performed at that resolution without instantiating the full dense grid. The perceptual range is [±20 m, ±20 m, -2 m to 4.4 m], which at 0.1 m implies a 400×400×64 grid; the memory figures in Table 2 are reported but the measurement protocol is not. The paper should state explicitly whether rendering is done densely, with sparse voxel lists, or via a rasterization/splatting pass, and how the memory numbers are measured. Relatedly, key hyperparameters (loss weights λ_nll, λ_lov, λ_bce, λ_cd, decoder depth, and the expansion schedule R_l) are not given, which impedes reproduction of the claimed efficiency and accuracy trade-off.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Experiments] The abstract calls 41.2 ms 'real-time'; at 30 FPS the budget is 33.3 ms. Please define the real-time criterion used, or soften the claim.
  2. [Table 1] The image size column lists '256×704' for sparse methods whereas the Implementation Details says inputs are resized and cropped to '704×256'. Please make the width/height convention consistent.
  3. [Table 2] The claim that GaussianSeed 'matches OPUS in reconstructing static backgrounds' is not directly supported by the table, since only overall mIoU and dynamic mIoU are reported. Please report static category mIoU or per-class IoU.
  4. [TJScenes Dataset section] No public URL or release plan is given for the TJScenes dataset, although the code repository is listed. A dataset contribution should state how the data, annotations, and splits will be distributed.
  5. [Eqs. (3)-(4)] The conversion from continuous occupancy outputs to hard voxel labels for mIoU computation is not described. Please specify the discretization/thresholding procedure used in both benchmarks.
  6. [Related Work] The comparison with GaussianFormer-2 on TJScenes is excluded because of its 'dataset-specific distribution initialization pipeline.' Since GaussianFormer-2 is the closest related method, please provide a concrete description of what prevents a fair adaptation and, if possible, give at least a reference-point experiment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central results are anchored to the external Occ3D-nuScenes benchmark; self-citations and the self-built TJScenes are not used as derivation inputs.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the model renders occupancy from Gaussian primitives via the standard probabilistic accumulation in Eqs. (1)-(4), and is trained with NLL, Lovasz, BCE, and Chamfer losses in Eq. (9). None of these losses or architectural components takes the reported mIoU, latency, or high-resolution success as an input; supervision is against ground-truth voxel labels, and evaluation is on held-out benchmarks. The main accuracy and latency claims are independently checkable on Occ3D-nuScenes, an external benchmark. The self-citations to GenerOcc (Pan et al. 2024) and SparseWorld-TC (Du et al. 2026) appear only in contextual related-work sentences and are not load-bearing for any derivation. The self-built TJScenes dataset does weaken the independence of the 0.1 m claim, and the annotation procedure is under-specified (only 'derived from Livox Mid-360 LiDAR scans' is stated), so label incompleteness is a genuine validity/correctness risk. But that is not circularity: no equation or fitted parameter reduces the prediction to the labels, and the dataset is not generated by the model. There is no invoked uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation, and no renaming of a known result as a new derivation. Under the rule that non-findings are expected when warranted, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four sets of assumptions: the sparsity of real scenes, the fidelity of Gaussian-to-voxel rendering, the completeness of the new 0.1 m labels, and the adequacy of Chamfer-distance positional supervision. No new physical entities are introduced; the Gaussian primitives and structural anchors are representational devices rather than postulated external objects.

free parameters (4)
  • Query count and Gaussian budget (Q=800, G_total=28800) = Q=800; G_total=28800
    Selected by ablation on Occ3D-nuScenes (Table 4); not derived from a first-principles budget.
  • Loss weights λ_nll, λ_lov, λ_bce, λ_cd = not specified
    Weights in Eq. 9 are not reported; set by hand. Without them the training objective is under-specified.
  • Decoder depth and Gaussian expansion schedule R_l = not stated
    The hierarchy (number of layers, offspring counts per layer) is a design choice not specified; the final 28800 Gaussians arise from undisclosed per-layer expansion.
  • Input crop 704×256 and temporal window of 8 frames = 704×256, 8 frames
    Choices that affect latency and accuracy; borrowed from prior work but still task-specific.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Real driving/campus scenes are mostly empty, so a sparse primitive set can represent dense occupancy.
    Used throughout to justify sparse Gaussians; implicit in Related Work and Method.
  • domain assumption The probabilistic Gaussian-to-voxel accumulation (Eqs. 1–4) from GaussianFormer-2 is an accurate differentiable proxy for occupancy.
    Adopted without re-derivation; the framework's output quality depends on this rendering assumption.
  • domain assumption LiDAR-derived 0.1m annotations in TJScenes are complete enough to serve as ground truth for dense occupancy.
    The dataset section describes scans but not labeling completeness, hole-filling, or human correction; the high-resolution claim depends on it.
  • domain assumption Chamfer distance loss with K≫G_l pulls centers to cluster centroids and is a valid positional supervisor.
    Eq. 6; no guarantee against spreading centers inside large empty voxels; relies on ground-truth points being representative.
  • domain assumption Standard cross-attention query decoding can learn geometry without depth priors.
    RBGI assumes regression plus CD loss suffices; no theoretical guarantee, only empirical.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GaussianSeed: Hierarchical Gaussian Seeding for High-Resolution 3D Occupancy Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LM7HHBIY

@misc{pith2026260720071,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GaussianSeed: Hierarchical Gaussian Seeding for High-Resolution 3D Occupancy Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LM7HHBIY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20071}
}
abstract

Vision-centric 3D occupancy prediction provides dense scene representations essential for autonomous driving and robotic navigation, yet existing methods struggle to scale to high voxel resolutions due to prohibitive computational costs. To address this, we introduce GaussianSeed, a progressive multi-scale Gaussian occupancy prediction framework that organizes primitives into a coarse-to-fine hierarchy. Benefiting from this hierarchical design, GaussianSeed effectively circumvents the memory bottlenecks inherent in dense representations, successfully scaling to a $0.1\text{m}$ spatial resolution while maintaining real-time inference capabilities. To comprehensively evaluate high-resolution geometric perception, we further construct TJScenes, a panoramic six-camera occupancy dataset with highly detailed $0.1\text{m}$ annotations. Extensive experiments on Occ3D-nuScenes and TJScenes demonstrate that GaussianSeed delivers the lowest latency among all evaluated methods while maintaining highly competitive accuracy, advancing the efficiency-quality frontier of high-resolution 3D occupancy prediction. Codes are available at https://github.com/Athameral/GUSD

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20071 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The same scene represented in different resolu￾tions. Voxels of 0.4m fall short to describe the curbs clearly, while a fine-grained resolution of 0.1m can accurately pre￾serve such subtle topological boundaries. where fine-grained, small objects are easily pruned as back￾ground by mistake. The latter bypasses space grids via point coordinate regression, yet the number of required points es￾calates cubically with hig… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The overall architecture of the GaussianSeed framework. At each decoder layer, queries are progressively refined leveraging multi-scale image features. These refined queries are subsequently decoded into 3D Gaussian primitives and rendered into the voxel space, where the dense occupancy ground truth is applied for direct supervision. three synergistic components: (i) Regression-Based Gaus￾sian Initialization (RBGI),… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. By decoupling center estimation from downstream [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Progressive refinement in HGSD. Early decoder layers anchor large-scale Gaussians onto reliable spatial po￾sitions (middle), while later layers utilize finer Gaussians to capture intricate geometric details. To alleviate this structural bottleneck, we present a Hi￾erar…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example panoramic images and associated ground truth voxels in TJScenes. This representative sample captures a plaza-like off-road environment, highlighting a critical scenario that is largely absent from current mainstream autonomous driving datasets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison on TJScenes. Top row: at a crossroad, our method successfully captures small and distant objects such as traffic cones and streetlamps, and correctly detects dynamic objects like bicycles. Bottom row: in an off-road playground scenario, our metho…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The customized platform for data collection. across 13 standard semantic categories, as illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Visualizing the hierarchical evolution of HGSD. From left to right, we observe the progressive refinement of Gaussian primitives. Early stages construct the rough geometric layout of a vehicle, while subsequent stages devolve into finer, highly-adapted ellipsoids to ca…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

    Tri-Perspective View for Vision-Based 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction , author =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages =

  2. [2]

    MonoScene: Monocular 3D Semantic Scene Completion , year =

    Cao, Anh-Quan and de Charette, Raoul , booktitle =. MonoScene: Monocular 3D Semantic Scene Completion , year =

  3. [3]

    Li, Zhiqi and Yu, Zhiding and Austin, David and Fang, Mingsheng and Lan, Shiyi and Kautz, Jan and Alvarez, Jose M , journal =

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , month =

    Chen, Dubing and Fang, Jin and Han, Wencheng and Cheng, Xinjing and Yin, Junbo and Xu, Chenzhong and Khan, Fahad Shahbaz and Shen, Jianbing , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , month =

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17118 , year =

    Fully sparse 3d panoptic occupancy prediction , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17118 , year =

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Opus: occupancy prediction using a sparse set , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17429 , year =

    GaussianFormer: Scene as Gaussians for Vision-Based 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17429 , year =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04384 , year =

    GaussianFormer-2: Probabilistic Gaussian Superposition for Efficient 3D Occupancy Prediction , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04384 , year =

    arXiv

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision , year =

    Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3D , author =. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision , year =

  2. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03991 , year =

    Openoccupancy: A large scale benchmark for surrounding semantic occupancy perception , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03991 , year =

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14365 , year =

    Occ3D: A Large-Scale 3D Occupancy Prediction Benchmark for Autonomous Driving , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14365 , year =

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , year =

    SSCBench: A Large-Scale 3D Semantic Scene Completion Benchmark for Autonomous Driving , author =. 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , year =

    2024

  5. [13]

    3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering , journal =

    Kerbl, Bernhard and Kopanas, Georgios and Leimk. 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering , journal =. 2023 , url =

    2023

  6. [14]

    2017 , eprint =

    Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection , author =. 2017 , eprint =

    2017

  7. [15]

    2023 , eprint =

    SparseBEV: High-Performance Sparse 3D Object Detection from Multi-Camera Videos , author =. 2023 , eprint =

    2023

  8. [16]

    2026 , eprint =

    GaussianOcc3D: A Gaussian-Based Adaptive Multi-modal 3D Occupancy Prediction , author =. 2026 , eprint =

    2026

  9. [17]

    2026 , eprint =

    GaussianFormer3D: Multi-Modal Gaussian-based Semantic Occupancy Prediction with 3D Deformable Attention , author =. 2026 , eprint =

    2026

  10. [18]

    Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transport , url =

    Cuturi, Marco , booktitle =. Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transport , url =

  11. [19]

    Berman, Maxim and Rannen Triki, Amal and Blaschko, Matthew B , booktitle =. The Lov

  12. [20]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =

    Achieving Speed-Accuracy Balance in Vision-based 3D Occupancy Prediction via Geometric-Semantic Disentanglement , volume =. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i3.32358 , abstractnote =

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =

    ProtoOcc: Accurate, Efficient 3D Occupancy Prediction Using Dual Branch Encoder-Prototype Query Decoder , volume =. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i4.32450 , abstractnote =

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformers

    Li, Zhiqi and Wang, Wenhai and Li, Hongyang and Xie, Enze and Sima, Chonghao and Lu, Tong and Qiao, Yu and Dai, Jifeng , booktitle =. BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformers. , url =

  15. [23]

    SurroundOcc: Multi-Camera 3D Occupancy Prediction for Autonomous Driving , year =

    Wei, Yi and Zhao, Linqing and Zheng, Wenzhao and Zhu, Zheng and Zhou, Jie and Lu, Jiwen , booktitle =. SurroundOcc: Multi-Camera 3D Occupancy Prediction for Autonomous Driving , year =

  16. [24]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages =

    Panoocc: Unified occupancy representation for camera-based 3d panoptic segmentation , author =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages =

  17. [25]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Ma, Qihang and Tan, Xin and Qu, Yanyun and Ma, Lizhuang and Zhang, Zhizhong and Xie, Yuan , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2024 , pages =

    2024

  18. [26]

    2024 , eprint =

    Vision-based 3D occupancy prediction in autonomous driving: a review and outlook , author =. 2024 , eprint =

    2024

  19. [27]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Sun, Pei and Kretzschmar, Henrik and Dotiwalla, Xerxes and Chouard, Aurelien and Patnaik, Vijaysai and Tsui, Paul and Guo, James and Zhou, Yin and Chai, Yuning and Caine, Benjamin and Vasudevan, Vijay and Han, Wei and Ngiam, Jiquan and Zhao, Hang and Timofeev, Aleksei and Etti...

  20. [28]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Du, Jiayuan and Zhao, Yiming and Guo, Zhenglong and Pan, Yong and Hou, Wenbo and Hao, Zhihui and Zhan, Kun and Chen, Qijun , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2026 , pages =

    2026

  21. [29]

    GenerOcc: Self-supervised Framework of Real-time 3D Occupancy Prediction for Monocular Generic Cameras , year =

    Pan, Xianghui and Du, Jiayuan and Su, Shuai and Zong, Wenhao and Wang, Xiao and Liu, Chengju and Chen, Qijun , booktitle =. GenerOcc: Self-supervised Framework of Real-time 3D Occupancy Prediction for Monocular Generic Cameras , year =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.