Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with Maxwell boundary conditions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Kinetic Fokker-Planck solutions with mixed-reflection boundary conditions are Hölder continuous with sharp exponent (3/π) arccos(α/2)−1 up to the grazing set.

desk verdict Genuinely important result, but the printed proof chain has a load-bearing typo in Proposition 5.7 that needs a one-line fix before the paper is ready. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20076 v1 pith:ZJYTM2X5 submitted 2026-07-22 math.AP

Kyeongbae Kim , Marvin Weidner This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q8435B6582C40
keywords kineticFokker-PlanckMaxwellboundaryconditionHölderregularitygrazingsetaccommodationcoefficientLiouvilletheoremsuper-elasticreflection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper resolves the boundary-regularity question for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations under Maxwell reflection boundary conditions, which mix diffuse and specular reflection through an accommodation coefficient α∈(0,1). The main result is that every weak solution is Hölder continuous up to the grazing set—the boundary points where particles move tangent to the wall—with the explicit exponent λ_α = (3/π) arccos(α/2) − 1, and that this exponent cannot be improved. The same argument also yields Hölder regularity with a smaller exponent when coefficients are only bounded and measurable. A unified version covers super-elastic reflection laws, where the exponent λ_{α,b} is defined by a trigonometric equation, and the authors show the whole theory is sharp by an explicit example.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the explicit one-dimensional solution φ_{α,b}(x,v), defined through confluent hypergeometric functions and homogeneous of degree λ_{α,b}; its boundary trace satisfies φ(0,v)=α φ(0,−bv), and the number λ_{α,b} is the intrinsic regularity exponent because any blow-up of a solution near the grazing set must be a constant multiple of φ_{α,b}. To reach that conclusion, the paper proves a boundary Harnack-type principle and a maximum principle in the half-space, plus a 1D Liouville classification of all polynomial-growth stationary solutions. Around this central object sits a kinetic Caccioppoli inequality at the boundary, a De Giorgi iteration scheme for local boundedne

What would settle it

Find a nontrivial, polynomially growing solution of v∂_x h − ∂_vv h=0 on {x>0} with h(0,v)=α h(0,−bv) for v>0 that is not a multiple of φ_{α,b} (a numerical search over the spectral problem would suffice); alternatively, construct a weak solution of the full kinetic equation with smooth data whose Hölder exponent at the grazing set exceeds λ_{α,b}.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the optimal Hölder exponent at the grazing set is not one of the endpoint values from earlier work (1/2 for diffuse reflection, C^{4,1}-type regularity for specular reflection) but a continuous function λ_α = (3/π) arccos(α/2) − 1 that decreases from 1/2 to 0 as α goes from 0 to 1. For smooth coefficients and data, solutions belong to C^{λ_α} up to and including the grazing set, with a quantitative estimate (Theorem 1.1(ii)); Example 7.4 proves sharpness by exhibiting a solution that lies in C^{λ_α} but in no C^{λ_α+ε}. For merely bounded measurable coefficients, the paper proves C^β regularity for some β∈(0,1), and the same method yiel

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the one-dimensional Liouville classification: every polynomial-growth solution of v∂_x h − ∂_vv h = 0 in the half-line with the reflection rule h(0,v)=α h(0,−bv) must be a constant multiple of the explicit function φ_{α,b}.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full range α∈(0,1) of Maxwell boundary conditions is now covered for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations; as α→0 the exponent recovers the known 1/2, and as α→1 it degenerates to 0, showing that specular regularity is a singular limit.
  • The quantitative C^{λ_α} estimate holds uniformly as α↘0 and degrades as α↗1, matching the optimality of the exponent and explaining why the intermediate regime requires new techniques.
  • For merely measurable coefficients, the De Giorgi-style C^β estimate is new for Maxwell conditions and gives a first step toward conditional regularity and continuation arguments in bounded domains.
  • The same framework yields sharp regularity for super-elastic and partial-specular reflection laws with exponent λ_{α,b}, including the mass-conserving case α=b².
  • Away from the grazing set, solutions are smooth whenever coefficients and data are smooth (Theorem 1.1(i)); all loss of regularity concentrates exactly at the grazing set.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One can test the predicted exponent numerically: simulate the Kolmogorov equation in a half-space with Maxwell reflection and measure the Hölder modulus along curves approaching the grazing set; it should scale like r^{λ_α}.
  • The same blow-up-plus-Liouville strategy could be transplanted to other hypoelliptic equations with anisotropic boundary operators, where the optimal exponent would emerge from a similar eigenvalue equation.
  • The exponent formula suggests a continuum of critical thresholds: as α approaches 1, attainable regularity tends to 0, so conditional-regularity results for Landau or Boltzmann equations in bounded domains will need more structure than plain Hölder continuity at the grazing set.
  • The paper proves local boundedness for bounce-back reflection but leaves its optimal exponent open; a natural testable conjecture is that a similar homogeneous solution exists with an exponent governed by an analogue of the trigonometric equation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops boundary regularity theory for linear kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with Maxwell-type boundary conditions, covering the intermediate accommodation regime α∈(0,1). The main results are: (i) Hölder continuity for merely bounded measurable coefficients (Theorem 1.2); (ii) sharp Hölder regularity of order λ_α = (3/π) arccos(α/2) − 1 up to the grazing set for sufficiently smooth coefficients (Theorem 1.1), with an explicit example showing optimality; and (iii) extensions to super-elastic and generalized reflection conditions (Theorem 1.3). The proof combines a De Giorgi iteration with boundary Caccioppoli-type inequalities, a boundary Harnack principle, a 1D Liouville classification, and a blow-up argument. The paper is ambitious and contains a substantial amount of new machinery, but several load-bearing steps are deferred to companion papers and one key statement contains a typo that affects the claimed proof.

Significance. If the gaps identified below are repaired, this is a significant contribution. It provides the first boundary regularity theory for the full Maxwell interpolation regime, identifies a new explicit sharp exponent λ_α, and shows with an explicit construction that the exponent is optimal at the grazing set. The unified framework for super-elastic reflections is also novel and likely to be useful. The explicit solution φ_{α,b}, the spectral characterization of λ_{α,b}, and the verifiable sharpness example are clear strengths. However, the manuscript as submitted is not self-contained at several central points: the regularity of the nonlocal term Nf is only sketched by reference to a companion paper, and the 1D Liouville theorem is misstated in a way that breaks the proof chain.

major comments (3)
  1. [5.3, Proposition 5.7] As printed, the boundary condition in (5.17) reads h(0,v)=α φ_{α,b}(0,−bv), which is a prescribed Dirichlet datum and does not couple h to itself. All auxiliary results used in the proof — Lemma 5.3, Lemma 5.4, Lemma 5.5, Lemma 5.6, and Proposition 5.2 — concern the α-reflection condition h(0,v)=α h(0,−bv). Under the printed hypothesis, the Harnack-type ratio estimates for h/φ cannot be invoked, and the conclusion h=mφ does not follow. Since Proposition 5.7 is the Liouville classification used in Theorem 5.8 and then in the blow-up limit in Proposition 6.2 (Eq. (6.16)), this is a load-bearing internal inconsistency. The natural correction h(0,v)=α h(0,−bv) is almost certainly what was intended — it is the condition in (5.1) and in Theorem 5.8 — but the statement must be corrected and the proof checked under the corrected condition.
  2. [7.1, Lemma 7.2] Lemma 7.2 is the key step establishing regularity of the nonlocal reflection term Nf, and Theorem 7.1 (hence Theorem 1.1) relies on it. The proof is not contained in the manuscript: after describing the inductive scheme in (7.8), the text says 'Since many parts of the proof closely follow from the same arguments as in [KW26a], we omit the corresponding details and refer the reader to [KW26a].' The actual estimates (7.12)–(7.16) and the reduction to Lemma 7.3 are either quoted or only sketched. For a journal submission, the Maxwell case cannot rest on a companion preprint in this way. Please include the full proof, or at least a complete statement with all constants, hypotheses, and exact reductions.
  3. [5.2, Proposition 5.2] Proposition 5.2 is the boundary Harnack estimate that is the main input to Proposition 5.7. Its proof is deferred: 'the proof is exactly the same as in the proof of [KW26a, Proposition 3.6] with R0=1.' Because the present problem involves the α-reflection condition h(0,v)=α h(0,−bv), which is not the diffuse case treated in [KW26a], this is not a purely cosmetic referral. The adaptation of the barrier, maximum principle, and covering arguments to the α-reflection condition should be written out at least in sufficient detail for the reader to verify the comparability of h/φ.
minor comments (5)
  1. [7.1, Lemma 7.2] The first bullet of Lemma 7.2 states 'Fix p≥1/2', while Theorem 7.1 and the surrounding text use p≥2. This inconsistency should be fixed.
  2. [1.2, Theorem 1.3] The statement begins 'Let Ω be a bounded domain for some ε>0'; it should read 'C^{2,ε} domain', as used later in the theorem.
  3. [4.2, before Lemma 4.6] There is an incomplete sentence: 'Since the reflection operator' is followed immediately by the lemma. Please complete or delete this fragment.
  4. [6, proof of Proposition 6.2] The display defining \tilde G_m has ambiguous parentheses and denominator placement. Please rewrite the expression so that the scaling is unambiguous.
  5. [References] The reference [KW26b] lists 'K. Kim and W. Weidner'; the second author should be 'M. Weidner'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the optimal exponent is derived from a spectral equation and an explicit solution, not assumed; self-citations are prior independent technical lemmas.

full rationale

No significant circularity. The central new content is the optimal Holder exponent lambda_alpha = (3/pi) arccos(alpha/2) - 1. It is not assumed: it is defined by the spectral equation (5.3), and Lemma 5.1 constructs an explicit phi_{alpha,b} solving the 1D equation and boundary condition, proving the lower bound phi in C^{lambda_alpha,b} \setminus C^{lambda_alpha,b+epsilon}. The upper bound is proved by blow-up (Proposition 6.2) and the Liouville classification (Theorem 5.8), neither of which uses the claimed Holder exponent as a fitted input; the expansion (6.4) is derived, not postulated. The self-citations [RW25], [KW26a], [KW26b] supply technical lemmas (in-flow regularity, transfer estimates, boundary Harnack-type arguments). These are prior independent results, not redefinitions of the present target, and no prediction reduces by construction to earlier fitted data. I do flag one non-circular correctness concern: Proposition 5.7 is printed with h(0,v) = alpha phi_{alpha,b}(0,-bv), whereas its proof invokes Proposition 5.2, whose reflection condition is h(0,v) = alpha h(0,-bv); the blow-up limit in (6.16) also satisfies the reflection condition. This appears to be a typographical error in a load-bearing statement, but it is a proof gap, not an equivalence of output to input, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on: (i) the physical boundary model, (ii) standard analytical tools, and (iii) the explicit solution φ_{α,b}, which is a mathematical construction, not an ad hoc entity. No free parameters are fitted to data; the exponent λ_{α,b} is the unique solution of a transcendental equation, derived from the boundary condition.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Uniform ellipticity Λ^{-1}I ≤ A ≤ ΛI and boundedness |B| ≤ Λ (equation (1.1) and §2).
    Standard assumptions ensuring the kinetic Fokker-Planck equation is well-posed in the energy class; not fitted.
  • domain assumption Domain Ω bounded C^{2,ε} and boundary γ split into incoming/outgoing/grazing sets (§1, §2).
    Geometric setup; regularity of the flattening map needed in §7.1.
  • domain assumption Maxwell-type reflection with α∈(0,1), b∈(0,1], α/b²≤1 and the weight M satisfying ∫ M(v)(v·n)_+ dv=1 (equations (1.2),(1.4)).
    The physical boundary model; dissipativity in L¹ used in (1.7)/Lemma 4.3.
  • standard math Known interior regularity and trace results: [Sil22, Prop. 4.2/4.3], [RW25, Lemma 2.25], [KW26a] (Lemma 2.3, Lemma 2.4).
    Background results imported from the literature; the paper does not reprove them but states them as lemmas.
  • standard math Fractional Sobolev trace embedding [DNPV12, Thm 8.2] used in Lemma 3.2 (3.8).
    Needed to control the boundary measure after extension across {x_n=0}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with Maxwell boundary conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJYTM2X5

@misc{pith2026260720076,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with Maxwell boundary conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJYTM2X5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20076}
}
abstract

We develop the boundary regularity theory for solutions to linear kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with Maxwell boundary conditions. These conditions interpolate between diffuse and specular reflection via an accommodation coefficient $\alpha \in [0,1]$. While existing literature is restricted to the extreme cases $\alpha = 0$ and $\alpha = 1$, we resolve the entire intermediate regime $\alpha \in (0,1)$. Specifically, we show that solutions are H\"older continuous if the coefficients are merely uniformly elliptic. Furthermore, for sufficiently smooth coefficients, we establish boundary regularity of order $\frac{3}{\pi} \arccos(\frac{\alpha}{2}) - 1$ up to the grazing set. This exponent is optimal. Beyond Maxwell conditions, we develop a unified approach that extends to a broad class of reflection boundary conditions, including super-elastic collisions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sharp kinetic trace theory

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Natural kinetic traces hold on half-spaces unrestricted, fail for unrestricted Gaussian when p<2 on every bounded C^{1,1} domain, and for bounded velocities are sharp exactly at boundary regularity α_p=1/(p+1).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , TITLE =

    Pagani, C. , TITLE =. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 1975 , NUMBER =

    1975

  2. [2]

    and Talenti, G

    Pagani, C. and Talenti, G. , TITLE =. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 1971 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/BF02415041 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/bf02415041 1971

  3. [3]

    Baouendi, M. S. and Grisvard, P. , TITLE =. J. Functional Analysis , FJOURNAL =. 1968 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/0022-1236(68)90012-8 , URL =

    doi:10.1016/0022-1236(68)90012-8 1968

  4. [4]

    Marshall, T. W. and Watson, E. J. , TITLE =. J. Phys. A , FJOURNAL =. 1985 , NUMBER =

    1985

  5. [5]

    and Protopopescu, V

    Beals, R. and Protopopescu, V. , TITLE =. J. Statist. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 1983 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01008957 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/bf01008957 1983

  6. [6]

    Burschka, M. A. and Titulaer, U. M. , TITLE =. J. Statist. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 1981 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01010804 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/bf01010804 1981

  7. [7]

    McKean, Jr., H. P. , TITLE =. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. , FJOURNAL =. 1963 , PAGES =. doi:10.1215/kjm/1250524936 , URL =

    arXiv 1963

  8. [8]

    , TITLE =

    Goldman, M. , TITLE =. Ann. Math. Statist. , FJOURNAL =. 1971 , PAGES =

    1971

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Sinai, Y. G. , TITLE =. Teoret. Mat. Fiz. , FJOURNAL =. 1992 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01036528 , URL =

    1992 doi

  2. [10]

    and Watanabe, S

    Isozaki, Y. and Watanabe, S. , TITLE =. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 1994 , NUMBER =

    1994

  3. [11]

    and Jongbloed, G

    Groeneboom, P. and Jongbloed, G. and Wellner, J. , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/aop/1022677447 , URL =

    1999

  4. [12]

    Karabash, I. M. , TITLE =. Spectral theory in inner product spaces and applications , SERIES =. 2009 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8911-6\_9 , URL =

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    , TITLE =

    Hou, M. , TITLE =. J. Differential Equations , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2025.113794 , URL =

    2026

  6. [14]

    arXiv:2505.11943 , doi =

    Optimal regularity for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations in domains. arXiv:2505.11943 , doi =

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    and Hwang, H

    Guo, Y. and Hwang, H. and Jang, J. and Ouyang, Z. , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-020-01496-5 , URL =

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    and Guo, Y

    Dong, H. and Guo, Y. and Yastrzhembskiy, T. , TITLE =. Kinet. Relat. Models , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.3934/krm.2022003 , URL =

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    , TITLE =

    Zhu, Y. , TITLE =. Ann. H. Lebesgue , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , PAGES =

    2024

  10. [18]

    , TITLE =

    Villani, C. , TITLE =. Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics,. 2002 , ISBN =. doi:10.1016/S1874-5792(02)80004-0 , URL =

    2002 doi

  11. [19]

    and Villani, C

    Desvillettes, L. and Villani, C. , TITLE =. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2001 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1002/1097-0312(200101)54:1<1::AID-CPA1>3.0.CO;2-Q , URL =

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    and Villani, C

    Desvillettes, L. and Villani, C. , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2005 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-004-0389-9 , URL =

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    and Silvestre, L

    Guillen, N. and Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. Acta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/acta.2025.v234.n2.a2 , URL =

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    , TITLE =

    Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. Ars Inven. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , PAGES =

    2022

  15. [23]

    and Silvestre, L

    Imbert, C. and Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/jams/986 , URL =

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    and Silvestre, L

    Imbert, C. and Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. Anal. PDE , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/apde.2021.14.171 , URL =

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    and Silvestre, L

    Imbert, C. and Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4171/jems/928 , URL =

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    and Snelson, S

    Henderson, C. and Snelson, S. , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-019-01465-7 , URL =

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    and Imbert, C

    Golse, F. and Imbert, C. and Mouhot, C. and Vasseur, A. , TITLE =. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , NUMBER =

    2019

  20. [28]

    and Silvestre, L

    Cameron, S. and Silvestre, L. and Snelson, S. , TITLE =. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2017.07.001 , URL =

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    and Mouhot, C

    Imbert, C. and Mouhot, C. , TITLE =. Ann. H. Lebesgue , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , PAGES =. doi:10.5802/ahl.75 , URL =

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    and Kim, C

    Guo, Y. and Kim, C. and Tonon, D. and Trescases, A. , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-016-0670-8 , URL =

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    and Snelson, S

    Henderson, C. and Snelson, S. and Tarfulea, A. , TITLE =. Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =

    2025

  24. [32]

    and Ros-Oton, X

    Fern\'andez-Real, X. and Ros-Oton, X. and Weidner, M. , TITLE =. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05356-9 , URL =

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    and Silvestre, L

    Imbert, C. and Silvestre, L. and Villani, C. , title =. Inventiones mathematicae , year =. doi:10.1007/s00222-025-01376-3 , url =

    doi

  26. [34]

    and Jang, J

    Hwang, H. and Jang, J. and Vel\'azquez, J. , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-014-0758-5 , URL =

    2014 doi

  27. [35]

    and Jang, J

    Hwang, H. and Jang, J. and Jung, J. , TITLE =. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1512/iumj.2015.64.5679 , URL =

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    and Jang, J

    Hwang, H. and Jang, J. and Jung, J. , TITLE =. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1137/16M1109928 , URL =

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    arXiv:2509.02536 , doi =

    Sharp boundary regularity properties for hypoelliptic kinetic equations. arXiv:2509.02536 , doi =

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    arXiv:2407.08785 , doi =

    A kinetic Nash inequality and precise boundary behavior of the kinetic Fokker-Planck equation. arXiv:2407.08785 , doi =

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    and Hou, M

    Avelin, B. and Hou, M. , TITLE =. Potential Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s11118-025-10242-z , URL =

    2026 doi

  32. [40]

    and Ros-Oton, X

    Fall, M. and Ros-Oton, X. , TITLE =. J. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2022.109523 , URL =

    2022

  33. [41]

    and Serra, J

    Ros-Oton, X. and Serra, J. , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2016 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/00127094-3476700 , URL =

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    and Armstrong, S

    Albritton, D. and Armstrong, S. and Mourrat, J.-C. and Novack, M. , TITLE =. Anal. PDE , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/apde.2024.17.1953 , URL =

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    and Lee, H.-S

    Kim, K. and Lee, H.-S. and Nowak, S. , title = ". arXiv:2502.09366 , archivePrefix =. 2502.09366 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    and Stegun, I

    Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. , TITLE =. 1964 , PAGES =

    1964

  37. [45]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

  38. [46]

    Litsg. The. J. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109226 , URL =

    2021

  39. [47]

    arXiv:2603.04121 , doi =

    Sharp regularity near the grazing set for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations. arXiv:2603.04121 , doi =

  40. [48]

    and Mouhot, C

    Guerand, J. and Mouhot, C. , TITLE =. J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , PAGES =. doi:10.5802/jep.203 , URL =

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    , TITLE =

    Mischler, S. , TITLE =. Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , NUMBER =. doi:10.24033/asens.2132 , URL =

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    and Carrapatoso, K

    Bernou, A. and Carrapatoso, K. and Mischler, S. and Tristani, I. , TITLE =. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4171/aihpc/44 , URL =

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    , TITLE =

    Zhu, Y. , TITLE =. Pure Appl. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/paa.2024.6.977 , URL =

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    , TITLE =

    Cercignani, C. , TITLE =. 2000 , PAGES =

    2000

  45. [53]

    and Silvestre, L

    Ouyang, Z. and Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-024-02002-x , URL =

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Conditional appearance of decay for the non-cutoff Boltzmann equation in a bounded domain. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.04368 , archivePrefix =. 2501.04368 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    , TITLE =

    Bouchut, F. , TITLE =. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , FJOURNAL =. 2002 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/S0021-7824(02)01264-3 , URL =

    2002 doi

  48. [56]

    and Polidoro, S

    Pascucci, A. and Polidoro, S. , TITLE =. Commun. Contemp. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2004 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S0219199704001355 , URL =

    2004 doi

  49. [57]

    and Palatucci, G

    Di Nezza, E. and Palatucci, G. and Valdinoci, E. , TITLE =. Bull. Sci. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004 , URL =

    2012 doi

  50. [58]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The non-cutoff Boltzmann equation in bounded domains. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2308.00494 , archivePrefix =. 2308.00494 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    and Jang, J

    Hwang, H. and Jang, J. and Vel\'azquez, J. , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1299-0 , URL =

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    and Jang, J

    Hwang, H. and Jang, J. and Vel\'azquez, J. , TITLE =. Quart. Appl. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/qam/1507 , URL =

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    , TITLE =

    Silvestre, L. , TITLE =. 2023 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34089-5\_3 , URL =

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    and Trizac, E

    Barrat, A. and Trizac, E. and Fuchs, J. , title =. European Physical Journal E , volume =. 2001 , doi =

    2001

  55. [63]

    and P\"oschel, T

    Brilliantov, N. and P\"oschel, T. , TITLE =. 2004 , PAGES =. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198530381.001.0001 , URL =

    2004

  56. [64]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Boundary Harnack estimates of optimal order for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.10185 , archivePrefix =. 2606.10185 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    , title =

    Maxwell, J. , title =. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London , volume =. 1879 , publisher =

  58. [66]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Strong diffusive limit of the Boltzmann equation with Maxwell boundary condition. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1809.06763 , archivePrefix =. 1809.06763 , primaryClass =

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.