Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 71 references

The Eos detector is built to prove that Cherenkov and scintillation light can be separated in a single instrument—via geometry, sub-nanosecond timing, and wavelength-sorting dichroicons—so that next-generation neutrino detectors can exploit

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Eos, a 4-ton hybrid optical detector at Berkeley, has been built and is taking calibration data to demonstrate simultaneous Cherenkov and scintillation detection for future neutrino detectors.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection A solid as-built instrumentation status report; the hybrid-detection capability claim is deferred to a companion paper, and the dichroicon geometry change from the validated bench setup is unquantified. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20285 v2 pith:UII745I2 submitted 2026-07-22 physics.ins-det

The Eos detector: a demonstrator of hybrid optical detection technology

Eos Collaboration: S. Arora , M. Askins , A. J. Bacon , Z. Bagdasarian , A. Baldoni , L. Bartoszek , M. Bergevin , Y. Bezawada
show 58 more authors
E. Blucher J. Boissevain R. Bonventre E. J. Callaghan D. F. Cowen K. DeHolton M. Diwan M. Dubnowski P. Englezos S. Gadamsetty C. Grant B. Harris M. R. Hebert S. Jeon T. Kaptanoglu A. Katt J. R. Klein T. Kroupova L. Lebanowski S. Lynch A. Mastbaum C. Mauger G. Mayers M. Miller J. Nachtman S. Naugle J. Newby M. Newcomer A. Nikolica G. D. Orebi Gann A. Phipps L. Pickard R. C. Pitelka L. Ren A. Rincon R. Rosero N. Rowe H. J. Ryoo J. Ryshkewitch J. Saba S. Schoppmann J. Shen M. Smiley H. Song H. Steiger B. Tam E. Tiras W. H. To M. R. Vagins R. Van Berg J. Wallig G. Wendel M. Wetstein M. Wurm G. Yang M. Yeh E. D. Zimmerman A. Zummo
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-det
keywords hybrid detectorCherenkov/scintillation separationdichroiconswater-based liquid scintillatorEos demonstratorphotosensorsneutrino detector R&Dcalibration sources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is the as-built design and data-taking plan for Eos, a roughly 4-tonne acrylic vessel surrounded by 241 photomultiplier tubes and enclosed in a 20-tonne water tank. Its central claim is that the detector can use Cherenkov and scintillation light together by separating the two components three ways: topologically, temporally, and spectrally, with 12 dichroicons representing the first wavelength-sorting implementation in a large-scale demonstrator. This matters because future neutrino detectors would gain directionality from Cherenkov light and high light yield/low threshold from scintillation light, and Eos is the integrated testbed meant to prove these technologies can work together and to calibrate them for scaling to much larger detectors. The paper argues that Eos will measure position, direction, and energy reconstruction performance in several target media, validate optical simulations, and guide the design of future hybrid detectors.

Core claim

Eos has the capability to utilize the combined Cherenkov/scintillation signatures by separating them topologically, through timing, and by wavelength. The wavelength separation is done by 12 dichroicons—cones lined with short-pass dichroic filters that send shorter-wavelength scintillation light to a rear PMT and concentrate longer-wavelength Cherenkov light on a front PMT. The paper argues that with sub-nanosecond PMTs, high photocathode coverage, and switchable target media (from pure water to water-based liquid scintillator to LAB/PPO), this makes Eos an integrated testbed that can measure position, direction, and energy reconstruction from sub-MeV to GeV, calibrate optical models, and gu

What carries the argument

The load-bearing optical element is the dichroicon: a light-collecting cone whose inner surface is formed from short-pass dichroic filters (cut-on at 450 nm) that reflect longer-wavelength Cherenkov light toward the aperture PMT while transmitting shorter-wavelength scintillation light to a rear PMT covered by an absorbing long-pass filter. Twelve dichroicons sit on the lower PMT array, pairing 8-inch fast PMTs with 10-inch PMTs behind them; the same array uses sub-nanosecond-timing PMTs and high photocathode coverage for the timing and topological separation axes, while the fluid-handling system allows the target medium to be changed.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that Eos can separate Cherenkov and scintillation light by wavelength rests on the dichroicon's filtering purity, but the as-built detector places the rear PMTs off the cone axis to increase acceptance, and the paper does not show how that changes purity relative to the bench-top demonstration.

What would settle it

Deploy the 90Sr Cherenkov source in the water-filled detector and measure the ratio of light seen by the dichroicon's aperture PMT versus its rear PMT; if the fraction of Cherenkov-tagged photons in the aperture channel falls substantially below the >90% bench-top purity, or if known Cherenkov rings leak into the rear (scintillation) channel, the wavelength-separation claim is not realized in Eos. The same test repeated with 374, 408, 442, and 510 nm laser light would isolate wavelength-dependent sorting.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If Eos performs as claimed, hybrid Cherenkov/scintillation detection moves from bench-top demonstrations to a working integrated detector, establishing that the technologies can coexist in one vessel.
  • The calibration program—isotropic laserball, barrel fibers, thorium, AmBe, PuBe, 137Cs, directional beta sources, and Cherenkov sources—will yield position, direction, and energy reconstruction performance from sub-MeV to GeV energies in several target media.
  • Results will validate and refine the detector simulation framework, allowing reliable extrapolation to kiloton-scale detector designs.
  • Demonstrating wavelength- and time-based separation in water-based liquid scintillator would support particle identification and background rejection in future neutrino detectors, including reactor monitoring and supernova-neutrino searches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The as-built offset of the rear 10-inch PMTs relative to the dichroicon axis is not analyzed in this paper; a direct simulation or measurement comparing centered versus offset geometry would be needed to confirm that the >90% Cherenkov purity from bench-top prototypes carries over to Eos.
  • If the separation is confirmed, the same detector concept could be tuned for different physics goals—e.g., low-energy solar or reactor neutrinos with high scintillator loading versus directional supernova neutrinos with low loading—simply by swapping the target medium.
  • Pile-up of Cherenkov and prompt scintillation photons on the same PMT is the practical limit at the current 500 MS/s digitization rate; a testable extension is to quantify separation efficiency as a function of digitizer bandwidth or with analog feature-extraction readout.
  • One could use the directional beta source's Cherenkov ring in a WbLS fill to directly measure the Cherenkov/scintillation ratio as a function of radius from the source, testing the wavelength-sorting purity in situ.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports the as-built design, construction, commissioning status, and calibration programme of Eos, a ~4-tonne acrylic-vessel demonstrator at UC Berkeley that integrates water-based liquid scintillator (WbLS), fast PMTs, and a 12-unit dichroicon array for spectral photon sorting. The stated goal (Sec. 2) is to demonstrate hybrid Cherenkov/scintillation detection by separating the two components topologically, by timing, and by wavelength, and to use an extensive radioactive and optical source suite to characterize position, direction, and energy reconstruction in water and WbLS. The manuscript describes the mechanical structures, PMT electronics, fluid handling, cover gas system, muon veto, trigger/DAQ, slow controls, simulation framework, deployment record, and future upgrade/redeployment options. Quantitative integrated-detector performance results are not included in this paper; they are deferred to a companion paper [47].

Significance. If realized, Eos would be the first large-scale integrated testbed combining WbLS, sub-ns PMTs, and dichroicons, and it would provide valuable engineering and calibration data for Theia-scale hybrid detectors. Strengths of the manuscript include its unusually detailed as-built documentation (dimensions, materials, part numbers), a well-designed calibration source suite (laserball, barrel fibres, thorium, AmBe, PuBe, 137Cs, directional beta, and Cherenkov sources), and an explicit deployment record covering water and two WbLS phases. The paper also cites independent bench-top validations of PMT performance [41] and dichroicon spectral sorting [39]. The principal caveat is that the central capability claim is not yet supported by integrated measurements reported in this manuscript; the paper defers to [47] and, in one important case, the as-built geometry differs from the geometry that was bench-top validated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2.3 / Fig. 11] The 'by wavelength' pillar of the central claim (Sec. 2) is not established for the as-built detector. The text cites >90% Cherenkov purity from a prototype dichroicon measurement [39], but the as-built array places the rear 10-inch PMTs offset from the dichroicon axis 'to increase photon acceptance' (Fig. 11 caption), and the rendering shows the PMT centered only 'for illustrative purposes.' No ray-trace, simulation, or measurement is provided for the effect of this offset on the spectral purity of the 8-inch Cherenkov channel or the 10-inch scintillation channel; the complementary scintillation purity is also not reported. Since the offset changes the angular distribution of light accepted by the short-pass/long-pass filter system, it can affect wavelength-sorting purity. Please add a quantitative assessment (simulation or a planned in-situ LIS calibration) of the as-built sorting perf
  2. [Secs. 3.2.1, 3.2.3 / Fig. 10] The as-built PMT inventory is internally inconsistent. Section 3.2.1 states 204 R14688-100 PMTs, with 168 on the barrel and 'the remaining 36 installed on the bottom dish'; Section 3.2.3 says 12 of those 36 have dichroicons. Figure 10, however, is captioned 'The lower dish with 16 R14688-100 8-inch PMTs and 12 dichroicons installed,' which would give 28 lower-dish PMTs and a total of 196 + 24 + 13 = 233, not the stated 241. Please reconcile the text and figure; this is essential for a paper whose purpose is to document the as-built detector.
  3. [Sec. 7 (and Sec. 2)] The timing pillar of the central claim is qualified by the paper's own readout discussion. Section 7 states that with 500 MS/s digitizers the 250 MHz Nyquist bandwidth limits the ability to resolve pulses that pile up, 'reducing the ability to distinguish a Cherenkov photon from prompt scintillation light recorded on the same channel.' Given the stated goal of separating Cherenkov and scintillation by timing, this limitation should be quantified or the Sec. 2 claim should be scoped to what the current readout can achieve (e.g., first-photon timing rather than per-channel pulse separation). Without this, the 'through timing' separation claim overstates the demonstrated capability.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 11 caption] The caption should state the actual offset distance and direction of the 10-inch PMT relative to the dichroicon axis, and the rendering should show the as-built geometry rather than a centered PMT labeled as illustrative.
  2. [Sec. 2 / Sec. 3.2.2] The phrase 'latest sub-ns photomultiplier tubes' in Sec. 2 applies to the R14688-100 but not to all deployed PMTs; the R11780 top-dish PMTs are not sub-ns. Please attribute the sub-ns timing claim to the specific channel types that satisfy it.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.1] State explicitly whether the quoted sub-ns FWHM refers to transit time spread or pulse width, to avoid ambiguity with the 'timing resolution below 1 ns' requirement in Sec. 2.
  4. [Sec. 3.3.3 / Fig. 21] The absorbance spectrum is labelled '1% WbLS' while the deployment record (Sec. 6) describes increasing WbLS concentration to 2%. Please clarify which formulation the spectrum represents and whether the text's 'final WbLS formulation' refers to 1% or 2%.
  5. [References] References [39] and [48] are the same paper (Kaptanoglu et al., Phys. Rev. D 101, 072002) and should be merged to avoid duplication.
  6. [Sec. 4.6] The self-triggering efficiency of the directional beta sources is quoted as ~50% without uncertainty or measurement method; please add a reference or a short description of how this was determined.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation; the paper is a hardware/calibration description and its performance claims rest on independent bench-top measurements and a disclosed validation loop.

full rationale

The paper does not present a derivation whose output is equivalent to its input. Its central claim (Sec. 2) is that the as-built detector has the capability to separate Cherenkov and scintillation light 'topologically, through timing, and by wavelength.' This is a design assertion, not a derived prediction; the wavelength-sorting evidence is explicitly external: 'Bench-top measurements of prototype dichroicon performance have shown promising results with greater than 90% Cherenkov purity' [39], a published measurement by authors overlapping with the collaboration but externally reproducible against a prototype. No parameter in this paper is fitted to the target quantity and then renamed as a prediction. Section 5 states that simulated optical properties are 'fine-tuned with an extensive in-situ calibration campaign [47]'; that is a standard, disclosed validation loop used to check reconstruction against data, and the present paper makes no claim to predict the water-phase results from the same data. The as-built dichroicon offset noted in the Fig. 11 caption ('the 10-inch PMTs are deployed in an offset position relative to the dichroicons to increase photon acceptance') is a potential performance-vs-geometry gap, but it is a correctness/validation limitation, not circularity: the paper does not claim that the offset geometry's spectral purity was derived or fitted. The many self-citations ([46], [47], and author papers such as [39], [41]) are not load-bearing in the sense of a self-referential uniqueness argument; they cite independent measurements or companion data. Therefore no specific reduction by construction is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper postulates no new physical entities; its assumptions are engineering/material-physics transfer assumptions. The central claim rests on the reliability of component-level measurements at scale.

free parameters (2)
  • Dichroicon cut-on wavelength = 450 nm
    Selected in Sec 3.2.3 as 'optimal for separating Cherenkov and scintillation photons' for the deployed formulations; no closed-form optimization or fit is shown.
  • WbLS scintillator concentrations = 1%, then 2%
    Operationally chosen loadings in Sec 6; not fitted to data.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption RAT-PAC2 (Geant4) simulations accurately model photon propagation, PMT response, and source collimation for Eos.
    Invoked in Sec 4.6 for beta collimation angles and Sec 5 for detector simulation; not independently verified within this paper.
  • domain assumption Bench-top measurements of PMTs ([41]) and dichroicons ([39]) transfer to the integrated in-water Eos configuration.
    Sec 3.2.1 and 3.2.3 assert sub-ns timing and >90% Cherenkov purity on this basis; the offset PMT placement is a stated deviation (Fig. 11).
  • domain assumption The optical properties of WbLS formulations can be maintained at 4-ton scale (stability of SRA/LS mixtures).
    Sec 6 describes degradation and recovery of the water+SRA mixture after procedural changes; the final WbLS performance is not quantified here.
  • domain assumption The 450 nm dichroic cut-on is optimal for separating the Cherenkov and scintillation spectra of the deployed formulations.
    Sec 3.2.3 states this is optimal without showing the spectral overlap calculation in this paper.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Eos detector: a demonstrator of hybrid optical detection technology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UII745I2

@misc{pith2026260720285,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Eos detector: a demonstrator of hybrid optical detection technology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UII745I2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20285}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Eos is an R&D testbed for hybrid detector technologies, featuring state-of-the-art sub-ns photosensors, the first implementation of dichroicons in a large-scale demonstrator, and the deployment of novel detection media such as water-based liquid scintillator (WbLS). By separating Cherenkov and scintillation light, Eos leverages the benefits of both to explore the potential of next-generation neutrino technologies. An extensive radioactive source calibration program enables the characterization of position, direction, and energy reconstruction performance of a variety of target materials. Furthermore, Eos will provide data to refine optical models and inform the development and simulation of future neutrino experiments. This paper describes the as-built design and data-taking plan of Eos, outlining its scientific motivations and role in the development of future detector technologies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [2]

    [3]The NOvAcollaboration,Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment,Phys

    G.C.Branco,R.GonzalezFelipeandF.Joaquim,LeptonicCPViolation,Rev.Mod.Phys.84(2012). [3]The NOvAcollaboration,Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment,Phys. Rev. D.106(2022)

    2012

  2. [4]

    Wilczek,Majorana returns,Nature Phys5(2009) 614–618

    F. Wilczek,Majorana returns,Nature Phys5(2009) 614–618

    2009

  3. [5]

    Capozzi et al.,Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,Phys

    F. Capozzi et al.,Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,Phys. Rev. D.111(2025)

    2025

  4. [6]

    Esteban et al.,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,J

    I. Esteban et al.,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,J. High Energ. Phys.2024(2024)

    2024

  5. [7]

    Navas et al.,Review of Particle Physics,Phys

    S. Navas et al.,Review of Particle Physics,Phys. Rev. D.110(2024) . [8]The Kamiokandecollaboration,Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN1987A, Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987)

    2024

  6. [9]

    Bethe and J.R

    H.A. Bethe and J.R. Wilson,Revival of a stalled supernova shock by neutrino heating,Astrophysical Journal295(1985) 14

    1985

  7. [10]

    Janka et al.,Theory of core-collapse supernovae,Physics Reports442(2007) 38

    H.T. Janka et al.,Theory of core-collapse supernovae,Physics Reports442(2007) 38. [11]The Super-Kamiokandecollaboration,Diffuse supernova neutrino background search at Super-Kamiokande,Phys. Rev. D.104(2021)

    2007

  8. [12]

    Vinyoles et al.,A New Generation of Standard Solar Models,ApJ835(2017)

    N. Vinyoles et al.,A New Generation of Standard Solar Models,ApJ835(2017) . [13]The KamLANDcollaboration,Abundances of Uranium and Thorium Elements in Earth Estimated by Geoneutrino Spectroscopy,Geophysical Research Letters49(2022) . [14]The Borexinocollaboration,Observation of Geo-Neutrinos,Phys.Lett.B.687(2010) 299. [15]The SNO+collaboration,Measurement...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [16]

    Carr et al.,Sensitivity of seismically cued antineutrino detectors to nuclear explosions,Phys

    R. Carr et al.,Sensitivity of seismically cued antineutrino detectors to nuclear explosions,Phys. Rev. Applied10(2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    Bernstein et al.,Colloquium: Neutrino detectors as tools for nuclear security,Rev

    A. Bernstein et al.,Colloquium: Neutrino detectors as tools for nuclear security,Rev. Mod. Phys.92 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Formaggio and G.P

    J.A. Formaggio and G.P. Zeller,From eV to EeV: Neutrino Cross Sections Across Energy Scales, Rev. Mod. Phys.84(2012) . [19]The Super-Kamiokandecollaboration,The Super-Kamiokande detector,Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A.501 (2003) 2. [20]The Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors1805.04163(2018) . [21]The Supe...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [30]

    J.R. Alonso et al.,Advanced Scintillator Detector Concept (ASDC): A Concept Paper on the Physics Potential of Water-Based Liquid Scintillator,arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors1409.5864 (2014)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [31]

    M. Yeh, S. Hans, W. Beriguete, R. Rosero, L. Hu, R. Hahn et al.,A new water-based liquid scintillator and potential applications,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A660(2011) 51

    2011

  14. [32]

    Biller, E.J

    S.D. Biller, E.J. Leming and J.L. Paton,Slow Fluors for Highly Effective Separation of Cherenkov Light in Liquid Scintillators,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A972(2020) 164106

    2020

  15. [33]

    Guo and Z

    Z. Guo and Z. Wang,Slow Liquid Scintillator for Scintillation and Cherenkov Light Separation, Springer Proc. Phys.213(2018) 173. [34]The Theiacollaboration,THEIA: an advanced optical neutrino detector,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 416

    2018

  16. [35]

    Caravaca, F.B

    J. Caravaca, F.B. Descamps, B. Land, J. Wallig, M. Yeh and G.D. Orebi Gann,Experiment to demonstrate separation of Cherenkov and scintillation signals,Phys. Rev. C95(2017) 055801

    2017

  17. [36]

    Callaghan et al.,Measurement of proton light yield of water-based liquid scintillator,Eur

    E.J. Callaghan et al.,Measurement of proton light yield of water-based liquid scintillator,Eur. Phys. J. C.83(2023)

    2023

  18. [37]

    Caravaca, B.J

    J. Caravaca, B.J. Land, M. Yeh and G.D. Orebi Gann,Characterization of water-based liquid scintillator for Cherenkov and scintillation separation,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 867

    2020

  19. [38]

    Onken, F

    D.R. Onken, F. Moretti, J. Caravaca, M. Yeh, G.D. Orebi Gann and E.D. Bourret,Time response of water-based liquid scintillator from x-ray excitation,Mater. Adv.1(2020) 71

    2020

  20. [40]

    Photomultiplier Tube R14688/R14688-100

    Hamamatsu, “Photomultiplier Tube R14688/R14688-100.” https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/ 99_SALES_LIBRARY/etd/R14688_R14688-100_TPMH1385E.pdf, 2022

    2022

  21. [41]

    T.Kaptanoglu, A.Rincon, M.Duce, S.Kaplan, J.Koplowitz, S.Lynchetal.,Characterizationofthe Hamamatsu 8-inch R14688-100 PMT,JINST19(2024) P02032

    2024

  22. [42]

    Xiang et al.,Design, construction, and operation of a 1-ton Water-based Liquid scintillator detector at Brookhaven National Laboratory,JINST19(2024)

    X. Xiang et al.,Design, construction, and operation of a 1-ton Water-based Liquid scintillator detector at Brookhaven National Laboratory,JINST19(2024) . – 41 –

    2024

  23. [43]

    S. Andrede et al.,Design, construction, and operation of a 30-ton Water-based Liquid scintillator detector at Brookhaven National Laboratory,arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors2603.20019 (2026) . [44]The Buttoncollaboration,The BUTTON-30 detector at Boulby,JINST21(2026) P03008. [45]The ANNIEcollaboration,Deployment of Water-based Liquid Scintillator in t...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [48]

    Kaptanoglu, M

    T. Kaptanoglu, M. Luo, B. Land, A. Bacon and J. Klein,Spectral Photon Sorting For Large-Scale Cherenkov and Scintillation Detectors,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 072002

    2020

  25. [49]

    72000 Series Standard Cycle Harsh Process Gate Valves.https://www.vacuumvalves.com

  26. [50]

    Reynolds Polymer Technology.https://www.reynoldspolymer.com

  27. [51]

    Brack, B

    J. Brack, B. Delgado, J. Dhooghe, J. Felde, B. Gookin, S. Grullon et al.,Characterization of the Hamamatsu R11780 12 in. Photomultiplier Tube,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A712(2013) 162

    2013

  28. [52]

    Large Area Photocathode Photomultiplier Tubes

    Hamamatsu, “Large Area Photocathode Photomultiplier Tubes.” https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/ 99_SALES_LIBRARY/etd/LARGE_AREA_PMT_TPMH1376E.pdf, 2022. [53]The LBNEcollaboration,The Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) Water Cherenkov Detector (WCD) Conceptual Design Report (CDR),arXiv: Instrumentation and Detec...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [54]

    Knight optical 450 nm dichroic shortpass filters

    Knight Optical, “Knight optical 450 nm dichroic shortpass filters.”https://www. knightoptical.com/stock/shortpass-dichroic-filter-450nm-25mmdia-x-1-1mmthk, 2025

    2025

  30. [55]

    Knight optical acrylic longpass filters

    Knight Optical, “Knight optical acrylic longpass filters.” https://www.knightoptical.com/stock/filters/acrylic-colour-filters, 2025

    2025

  31. [56]

    Förster,Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz,Ann

    T. Förster,Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz,Ann. Phys.437(1948) 55

    1948

  32. [57]

    https://www.xylem.com/en-us/brand/goulds-water-technology/

    Goulds Water Technology. https://www.xylem.com/en-us/brand/goulds-water-technology/

  33. [58]

    Sanitron Germicidal Ultraviolet Water Purifiers.https://d163axztg8am2h.cloudfront.net/ static/doc/3a/d5/09bc85d16b387ac1854dcba91c01.pdf

  34. [59]

    https://www.thermalcare.com/assets/files/EQ%20Specification%2014.pdf

    Accuchiller EQ Series. https://www.thermalcare.com/assets/files/EQ%20Specification%2014.pdf

    2014

  35. [60]

    html?filter[model-family]=M800%20Process&filter[model-family]=M800%20Water

    M800 Multi-channel Transmitter.https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/products/ Process-Analytics/transmitter/multi-parameter-digital-transmitter-M800. html?filter[model-family]=M800%20Process&filter[model-family]=M800%20Water

  36. [61]

    Asurity Flood Detector.https://www.asurityhvacr.com/wet-switch-flood-detector

  37. [62]

    UV-2600i Plus.https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/pim/pim_ document_file/brochures/25086/c101-e184.pdf

  38. [63]

    Shimadzu.https://www.shimadzu.com. – 42 –

  39. [64]

    Finish Thompson Inc.https://www.finishthompson.com/products/sp10/

  40. [65]

    Iwaki America.https://iwakiamerica.com

  41. [66]

    AMI Model 2001RS.https://www.amio2.com/oxygen-analyzers/ trace-oxygen-analyzers/model-2001rs/#technical-specs

  42. [67]

    https://assets.dwyeromega.com/pdf/test-and-measurement-equipment/pressure/ pressure-transducers/PX409_Series.pdf

    High Accuracy Pressure Transducers. https://assets.dwyeromega.com/pdf/test-and-measurement-equipment/pressure/ pressure-transducers/PX409_Series.pdf

  43. [68]

    https://www.predig.com/sites/default/files/documents/LDS6602.pdf

    PD6600 Loop Leader Loop-Powered Process Meters. https://www.predig.com/sites/default/files/documents/LDS6602.pdf

  44. [69]

    G7 Series Solenoid Valves.https://www.parker.com/content/dam/Parker-com/ Literature/Fluid-Control-Division/Catalogs/Parker_FCD_Catalog-G7.pdf

  45. [70]

    Bieser et al.,The STAR Trigger,Nucl

    F.S. Bieser et al.,The STAR Trigger,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A.499(2003)

    2003

  46. [71]

    Muller and J

    B. Muller and J. Nagle,Results from the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56(2006) 93

    2006

  47. [72]

    The ToolDAQ DAQ Software Framework & Its Use In The Hyper-K & ANNIE Detectors

    B. Richards, “The ToolDAQ DAQ Software Framework & Its Use In The Hyper-K & ANNIE Detectors.”https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921401022

    arXiv

  48. [73]

    WbLSDAQ

    B. J. Land, “WbLSDAQ.”http://github.com/BenLand100/WbLSdaq

  49. [74]

    CAEN A7030 Specifications.https://www.caen.it/products/a7030/

  50. [75]

    CAEN V1730 Specifications.https://www.caen.it/products/v1730/

  51. [76]

    CAEN A3818 Specifications.https://www.caen.it/products/a3818/

  52. [77]

    Montanari et al.,Performance and results of the LBNE 35 ton membrane cryostat prototype, Physics Procedia67(2015) 308 – 313

    D. Montanari et al.,Performance and results of the LBNE 35 ton membrane cryostat prototype, Physics Procedia67(2015) 308 – 313. [78]The DUNEcollaboration,First results on ProtoDUNE-SP liquid argon time projection chamber performance from a beam test at the CERN Neutrino Platform,JINST15P12004

    2015

  53. [79]

    Machado, O

    P.A. Machado, O. Palamara and D.W. Schmitz,The short-baseline neutrino program at fermilab, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science69(2019) 363

    2019

  54. [80]

    https://www.enclustra.com/en/products/system-on-chip-modules/mercury-xu5

    Enclustra Mercury Specifications. https://www.enclustra.com/en/products/system-on-chip-modules/mercury-xu5

  55. [81]

    Datasheet: RTD Probes with M12 Molded Connectors

    Dwyer Omega, “Datasheet: RTD Probes with M12 Molded Connectors.” https://assets.dwyeromega.com/pdf/test-and-measurement-equipment/ temperature/sensors/rtds/PR-22.pdf

  56. [82]

    Datasheet: Adafruit 4965

    Adafruit, “Datasheet: Adafruit 4965.” https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/product-files/4965/Datasheet.pdf

  57. [83]

    Datasheet: A02YYUW Waterproof Ultrasonic Sensor

    DFRobot, “Datasheet: A02YYUW Waterproof Ultrasonic Sensor.”https: //mm.digikey.com/Volume0/opasdata/d220001/medias/docus/201/SEN0311_Web.pdf

  58. [84]

    User Manual: Arduino Mega 2560 Rev3

    Arduino, “User Manual: Arduino Mega 2560 Rev3.” https://docs.arduino.cc/resources/datasheets/A000067-datasheet.pdf

  59. [85]

    Datasheet: LS25-150 Series

    TDK Lambda, “Datasheet: LS25-150 Series.” https://product.tdk.com/system/files/dam/doc/product/power/switching-power/ ac-dc-converter/catalog/ls25-150_e.pdf. – 43 –

  60. [86]

    Redis: Open Source

    Redis, “Redis: Open Source.”https://redis.io/open-source/

  61. [87]

    uthash: a hash table for C structures

    T.D. Hanson and A. O’Dwyer, “uthash: a hash table for C structures.” https://troydhanson.github.io/uthash/

  62. [88]

    Hdf5-version 1.12.0

    T.H. Group and Q. Koziol, “Hdf5-version 1.12.0.” [Computer Software] https://doi.org/10.11578/dc.20180330.1, 2, 2020. 10.11578/dc.20180330.1

    doi:10.11578/dc.20180330.1 2020

  63. [89]

    ctypes— A foreign function library for Python

    Python Software Foundation, “ctypes— A foreign function library for Python.” https://docs.python.org/3/library/ctypes.html. [90]The SNO+collaboration,The SNO+ experiment,JINST16(2021) P08059 [2104.11687]. [91]The SNO+collaboration, “GitHub Repository: snoplus/minard.” https://github.com/snoplus/minard

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [92]

    Flask Documentation

    Pallets, “Flask Documentation.”https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/stable/

  65. [93]

    https://www.nktphotonics.com/products/pulsed-diode-lasers/pilas/

    NKT Photonics. https://www.nktphotonics.com/products/pulsed-diode-lasers/pilas/

  66. [94]

    Eckert & Ziegler.https://ezag.com

  67. [95]

    Spectrum Techniques.https://www.spectrumtechniques.com/

  68. [96]

    RAT User Guide

    S. Seibert et al., “RAT User Guide.”https://rat.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, 2014

    2014

  69. [97]

    Bolton,The Braidwood Reactor Anitneutrino Experiment,Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements149(2005) 166 – 169

    T. Bolton,The Braidwood Reactor Anitneutrino Experiment,Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements149(2005) 166 – 169

    2005

  70. [98]

    Wang,MiniCLEAN Dark Matter Experiment,arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors1711.02117 (2017)

    J. Wang,MiniCLEAN Dark Matter Experiment,arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors1711.02117 (2017) . [99]The DEAPcollaboration,Search for dark matter with a 231-day exposure of liquid argon using DEAP-3600 at SNOLAB,Phys. Rev. D.100(2019) . [100]GEANT4collaboration,GEANT4–a simulation toolkit,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250. [101]The SNO+collaboration,Dev...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [102]

    [103]The COHERENTcollaboration,Simulating the neutrino flux from the Spallation Neutron Source for the COHERENT experiment,Phys

    CAEN V1742 Specifications.https://www.caen.it/products/v1742/. [103]The COHERENTcollaboration,Simulating the neutrino flux from the Spallation Neutron Source for the COHERENT experiment,Phys. Rev. D.106(2022) 032003. – 44 –

    2022

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.