Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Long- and Short-Range Anion Order in SrTiO$_{3-x}$H$_x$ Perovskite Oxyhydrides: DFT+$U$ Sensitivity and HSE06 Cluster Expansion

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read In SrTiO3−xHx oxyhydrides, hydride ions strongly prefer to sit on adjacent anion sites, a cis O4H2 ordering that prior simulation studies overlooked.

desk verdict Worth a serious referee: the cis-pair stabilization is a real, well-argued effect, but the unvalidated HSE06 reference and the proxy-U fitting circularity keep the quantitative ~200 meV/H claim from being closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20885 v1 pith:QSNHYI6E submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords perovskiteoxyhydridesanionorderingclusterexpansionHSE06DFT+UO4H2cisconfigurationshort-rangeorderSrTiO3-xHx
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that hydride ions in the perovskite oxyhydride SrTiO3−xHx do not spread out randomly or stay isolated; instead, pairs of hydrides preferentially occupy first-nearest-neighbor anion sites around a titanium center, the O4H2 cis configuration. The preference is large—roughly 200 meV per hydride—and it persists even at dilute hydrogen content and in disordered high-temperature states. The authors also show that ordering energies vary by about 100 meV/anion depending on the DFT+U correction, and they identify U = 3.3 eV as a low-cost proxy that reproduces HSE06 hybrid-functional ordering energetics well enough to train a cluster expansion. If the cis preference is correct, models that assume isolated hydrides in supercells misrepresent the locally relevant configurations for diffusion and other properties.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is a cluster expansion (CE), a lattice Hamiltonian that writes the configurational energy of the O/H sublattice as a sum of interaction coefficients over clusters of anion sites, trained on HSE06 hybrid-functional energies. Because HSE06 is computationally expensive, the authors first demonstrate that PBE+U ordering energies swing by about 100 meV/anion as U varies, then select U = 3.3 eV as a proxy that best reproduces HSE06 ordering stability according to both absolute and pairwise deviation metrics. This proxy-U is used for active-learning structure selection, and a representative subset of 68 configurations is recalculated with HSE06 to train the final CE. The resulting

What would settle it

Recalculate the relative energies of the cis pair, trans pair, and isolated hydride at the dilute composition (e.g., Sr8Ti8O23H) with a method independent of semilocal and hybrid DFT self-interaction corrections, such as diffusion Monte Carlo or an embedded wavefunction approach. If the cis-trans energy difference drops below about 100 meV/H, or if the cis pair is not the lowest-energy local arrangement, the central ordering claim is undermined. On the experimental side, neutron pair distribution analysis of a sample near x = 0.6 that shows no excess of cis-like O4H2 octahedra would contradict

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that SrTiO3−xHx shows a consistent, composition-wide tendency for two hydride ions to occupy first-nearest-neighbor anion sites around the same Ti—the O4H2 cis octahedral configuration—rather than the trans arrangement or isolated hydrides. Evidence comes from three independent routes: the ground-state ordered structures all share a corner-sharing 'cis-stair' pattern; a tercile analysis shows low-energy configurations are dominated by high fractions of O4H2 cis octahedra; and Monte Carlo sampling of the cluster-expansion Hamiltonians at 350 K shows short-range order in disordered states, with O4H2 cis populations well above the random limit. At the dilute composition Sr8

Load-bearing premise

The paper's load-bearing premise is that HSE06 hybrid-DFT correctly captures the ordering energetics of SrTiO3−xHx; the authors explicitly state there is currently no direct evidence that hybrid functionals yield the most accurate ordering stability in these oxyhydrides, and both the proxy-U calibration and the headline cis-preference claim lean on HSE06 as the reference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dilute-limit supercells containing a single isolated hydride miss a stabilization on the order of 200 meV/H from forming nearest-neighbor cis pairs, so computed energetics for hydride-related processes should be re-examined.
  • Hydride migration may not be describable as a single ion hopping between equivalent sites: moving a hydride out of a stable cis pair changes the local ordering energy, potentially making diffusion cooperative or correlated.
  • Short-range order persists in the disordered state at 350 K, so even nominally disordered SrTiO3−xHx is not a random anion mixture; local octahedral statistics deviate clearly from the random limit.
  • DFT+U studies of anion ordering in reduced titanium perovskites should report U sensitivity, since the identity and stability ordering of ground states shift by more than 100 meV/anion across U = 0 to 6 eV.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cis-pair mechanism plausibly operates in BaTiO3−xHx and CaTiO3−xHx, whose prior simulation studies also assumed isolated hydrides; this is an extension beyond the paper's explicit claim.
  • The proxy-U strategy—fitting a cheap DFT+U to hybrid-functional ordering energetics for structure selection before a smaller set of expensive hybrid calculations—could transfer to other systems where electron over-delocalization corrupts configurational energetics, though the fitted U is a numerical proxy rather than a physically universal Hubbard parameter.
  • A concrete experimental test would be neutron total scattering or pair distribution function analysis of SrTiO2.4H0.6 looking for an excess of corner-sharing O4H2 cis octahedra relative to a random anion model; such data could corroborate or refute the predicted short-range order.
  • Because the cis preference rests on HSE06 as the reference, a future recalculation of the 68 key configurations with a method beyond hybrid DFT would quantify how much of the preference is functional-dependent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a cluster expansion (CE) framework for anion ordering in SrTiO3−xHx, using HSE06 hybrid-DFT energetics as the reference. The authors first show that ordering stability and ground states are highly sensitive to the choice of DFT+U on Ti, with variations on the order of 100 meV/anion. They fit U = 3.3 eV as an HSE06 proxy using MAD/MAPD metrics, use this proxy to perform active-learning structure selection, and then compute HSE06 energies for 68 key configurations to build a final CE (CE2). On this basis they report a strong preference for the O4H2 cis configuration: ground-state orderings U, V, and W all contain cis-type motifs; dilute-limit calculations at Sr8Ti8O23H give roughly 200 meV/H stabilization of a cis H2 pair over isolated H; and Monte Carlo sampling of the CE models shows short-range order favoring cis octahedra at 350 K. The paper explicitly acknowledges that HSE06 has not been independently validated for this ordering problem and that CE2 has limited fit quality, but the Abstract and Conclusion nonetheless present the cis preference as a robust finding.

Significance. If correct, the central result is important: it would overturn the common isolated-H picture for modeling ATiO3−xHx and imply that anion ordering must be included in studies of hydride migration, polaron formation, and other properties. The paper has clear strengths: the direct dilute-limit cis/trans binding-energy comparison is a clean, selection-independent DFT test; the DFT+U sensitivity analysis is systematic and useful to the community; and the proposed hybrid-DFT CE construction workflow, combining a proxy functional with active learning, is a practical methodological contribution. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly flagging the main caveat about HSE06 reliability. However, the quantitative claim of ~200 meV/H and the qualitative claim of a 'strong preference' are conditioned on the accuracy of HSE06 ordering energetics, which is not independently established. In addition, the HSE06 training set is selected using a proxy fitted to HSE06, and the final CE has a 5-fold CV error of 28.1 meV/anion—comparable to kT at the Monte Carlo temperature used for the short-range-order predictions. These issues make the paper suitable for publication only after substantial revis

major comments (4)
  1. [Introduction; Fig. 7c] The central quantitative result (~200 meV/H cis stabilization) and the broad 'strong preference' claim rest on HSE06 as the reference, but the authors state in the Introduction that 'there is currently no direct evidence that hybrid functionals necessarily yield the most accurate ordering stability in ATiO3−xHx.' Plain PBE shows a 'less pronounced' cis stabilization, so the magnitude and possibly the existence of the preference are functional-dependent. This is a load-bearing point, not a minor caveat. Please add an independent check—for example, RPA or DMC calculations for a few anion orderings, or HSE calculations with a different exact-exchange mixing fraction—or explicitly reframe the Abstract and Conclusion so that the cis preference is presented as conditional on hybrid-functional accuracy rather than as an established physical tendency.
  2. [HSE06 and Proxy-U Cluster Expansion; Fig. 6a,b] The HSE06 training set was selected using the proxy-U CE1, and U = 3.3 eV was itself fitted to HSE06 ordering stability (Eqs. 3–4). The agreement between proxy-U and HSE06 in Fig. 6a,b (MAD 7.3 meV/anion) is therefore not an independent validation of the proxy: the 68 structures are biased toward configurations that proxy-U already identifies as important. The direct dilute-limit binding calculation escapes this circularity, but the ground-state hull (U, V, W) and the MC sampling do not. Please quantify the selection bias—for example, by computing HSE06 energies for a D-optimal-only or random subset and showing that the proxy-U selection does not change the hull/CE—or explicitly restrict the proxy-U reliability claim to the dilute-limit binding energy.
  3. [HSE06 CE fitting, Fig. 6c and Fig. 8] CE2 has a 5-fold CV error of 28.1 meV/anion (Fig. 6c), and the text notes that CE2 predicts additional nearly degenerate ground states that 'deepen the hull slightly' but were not recalculated with HSE06. At the MC temperature of 350 K, kT is about 30 meV/anion, so the CE2 fitting error is comparable to the thermal energy governing the disordered-state octahedral populations reported in Fig. 8. The qualitative agreement between CE1 and CE2 is reassuring, but the quantitative SRO values (e.g., the cis population relative to O5H1) may lie within the model uncertainty. Please report the magnitude of the missed hull deepening, provide error estimates on the MC SRO quantities from ECI resampling or an equivalent uncertainty propagation, and state explicitly whether the 'strong preference' conclusion is robust to these uncertainties.
  4. [DFT+U Sensitivity, Eqs. (3)–(4)] The choice of U = 3.3 eV as the HSE06 proxy is based on only two compositions, Sr2Ti2O5H and SrTiO2H (Fig. 4e,f). The later comparison on 68 structures is broader, but that comparison is affected by the selection bias described above. Since the proxy-U is used to select the HSE06 training set and to guide the MC simulations, its domain of validity should be tested on a composition-diverse set not involved in the fitting—for example, by leave-one-composition-out cross-validation. This would strengthen the claim that proxy-U is a reliable structure-selection tool across the full composition range x = 0 to 1.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 3] There is a typo in Eq. (2): 'tans c' should be 'trans c'. Also, please clarify in the caption or text how the rows of the C-matrix correspond to the cluster labels in Fig. 3, since the current notation is dense.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption lists panels (d) and (e) as 'Sr2Ti2O5H and SrTiO2H differences...' while the main text refers to panels (d), (e), and (f) with overlapping descriptions. Please harmonize the panel numbering and in-text references.
  3. [Fig. 7c] The binding-energy definition is described verbally but not given algebraically. Please state explicitly how E_b for the cis and trans H2 pairs is computed from the total energies of the 2×2×2 and 2×2×4 supercells, so the reader can verify the -200 meV/H value.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusion] The Abstract says '200 meV per hydride' while the body says 'nearly 200 meV/H under proxy-U and exceeds 200 meV/H with HSE06.' Please make the quantitative statement consistent and indicate which functional the Abstract value refers to.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Proxy-U is fitted to HSE06 and then used to select the HSE06 CE training set, making the proxy-U/HSE06 hull agreement partly a selection artifact; the dilute-limit cis binding energies are independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, Fig. 2 caption; 'DFT+U Sensitivity and HSE06 Proxy' Eqs. (3)-(4); 'HSE06 and Proxy-U Cluster Expansion', Fig. 6a]
    "This framework first yields an intermediate output CE1 trained on the ordering energetics of 531 structures ... with DFT+U (U=3.3 eV on Ti, also denoted as proxy-U where convenient) used as an HSE06 proxy determined in the preliminary stage. Representative subset selection is then performed to identify key configurations for the HSE06 CE fitting, yielding the final output CE2 trained with HSE06 energetics. ... We observe that, across this entire HSE06 convex hull, which includes an extensive set of structures beyond those used in the proxy-U fitting step of the preliminary stage, the low-cost"

    U=3.3 eV is chosen by minimizing MAD/MAPD between PBE+U and HSE06 ordering energies on an initial structure set (Eqs. 3-4). This fitted proxy-U is then the Hamiltonian used in active-learning and D-optimal selection of the 68 'key configurations' that become the HSE06 CE2 training set. Consequently, the statement that proxy-U 'predictions still agree well with the HSE06 results' on the Fig. 6 hull is not an out-of-sample validation: the HSE06 hull structures were preselected because proxy-U already placed them on/near its convex hull. The agreement is partly a selection artifact. This does not fully determine the cis-preference claim, because the dilute-limit cis/trans binding energies (Fig. 7c) are direct supercell DFT comparisons independent of the CE fits.

full rationale

The only substantive circularity concern is the proxy-U workflow: a U value is fitted to HSE06 ordering stability, then used to select the HSE06 CE training set, and the subsequent proxy-U/HSE06 hull agreement is cited as evidence of consistency. This is a genuine selection-bias issue in the validation logic, but it is transparently described and does not by itself force the central physical claim. The dilute-limit cis binding energy (Fig. 7c) is a direct HSE06 and proxy-U supercell comparison that does not depend on the cluster-expansion fit, giving the cis-preference conclusion independent grounding. No load-bearing self-citation was found: refs. 39 and 73 are self-citations but serve as supporting examples or methodological references, and the C-matrix formalism is standard. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that HSE06 accuracy for ordering stability is not directly validated; that is an accuracy/functional-sensitivity risk rather than a circularity, because HSE06 energies are independently computed first-principles quantities rather than outputs fitted to the target claim. Overall, the paper is partially circular in its proxy-validation narrative but not in its main dilute-limit prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on (1) the unvalidated assumption that HSE06 is the correct reference for oxyhydride ordering energetics—explicitly flagged in the paper itself; (2) a 3.3 eV U value fitted to HSE06; (3) a truncated cluster basis whose incompleteness shows up in CE2's high CV and appearance of extra near-degenerate ground states upon prediction; and (4) a truncated supercell search space. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • U_eff on Ti (proxy-U) = 3.3 eV
    Chosen to minimize MAD/MAPD of ordering stability vs HSE06 at Sr2Ti2O5H and SrTiO2H (Eq. 3–4); used as HSE06 proxy for structure selection.
  • CE hyperparameters (cluster cutoffs, LASSO regularization, importance weights) = Not reported numerically
    Tuned via Optuna automl (TPE + CMA-ES) and manual assignment for CE1/CE2; these choices affect ECI values, convex hull, and MC SRO, and are not unique.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption HSE06 hybrid functional provides accurate reference ordering energetics for SrTiO3−xHx
    Stated in Introduction: 'there is currently no direct evidence that hybrid functionals necessarily yield the most accurate ordering stability in ATiO3−xHx'; the entire benchmarking treats HSE06 as ground truth without experimental validation.
  • domain assumption The 354,328-configuration supercell search space (≤40 atoms) spans relevant ground-state and SRO configurations
    Configuration space truncated by supercell size; no convergence test vs larger cells reported.
  • ad hoc to paper Cluster basis with triplets/quadruplets only up to next-nearest-neighbor is sufficient for CE2
    Cutoffs reduced based on proxy-U ECI behavior; CE2 CV = 28.1 meV/anion and additional near-degenerate configurations appeared when CE2 was used to predict, indicating basis incompleteness.
  • standard math C-matrix transformation (Eq. 2) correctly maps cluster correlations to octahedral probabilities
    Equation 2 converts octahedral probabilities to cluster correlations; the authors double-checked by direct counting of MC snapshots in several cases.
  • domain assumption Ferromagnetic initial magnetic moments on Ti are sufficient; AFM/NM configurations are not lower in energy
    Stated in Methodology: 'Initial magnetic moments on Ti were assigned in ferromagnetic configurations, while nonmagnetic and antiferromagnetic configurations were tested and found not to lower the energy.' Non-collinear orders were not exhausted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long- and Short-Range Anion Order in SrTiO$_{3-x}$H$_x$ Perovskite Oxyhydrides: DFT+$U$ Sensitivity and HSE06 Cluster Expansion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QSNHYI6E

@misc{pith2026260720885,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long- and Short-Range Anion Order in SrTiO$_3-x$H$_x$ Perovskite Oxyhydrides: DFT+$U$ Sensitivity and HSE06 Cluster Expansion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QSNHYI6E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20885}
}
abstract

Anion ordering in perovskite oxyhydrides can remain significant even in disordered states, particularly at non-dilute hydrogen concentrations. Nevertheless, hydride substitution poses challenges for accurate simulations based on density functional theory due to configurational complexity and Ti 3$d$ reduction. Here, we develop a cluster expansion (CE) framework for SrTiO$_{3-x}$H$_x$ incorporating HSE06 hybrid-DFT energetics. We first demonstrate that calculated mixing energies and ordering stability are highly sensitive to the choice of DFT+$U$, with maximum variations on the order of 100 meV/anion. We benchmark ordering energetics against HSE06 calculations and identify $U$ = 3.3 eV as an HSE06 proxy, which enables extensive configurational exploration while limiting costly HSE06 calculations to key configurations for efficient learning of ordering energetics. Together, ground-state orderings, correlations between octahedral configurations and structural stability, and MC sampling of CE models all support a strong preference for the O$_4$H$_2$ cis configuration in SrTiO$_{3-x}$H$_x$, in which two hydride ions occupy first-nearest-neighbor anion sites. This cis-type preference was overlooked in previous ATiO$_{3-x}$H$_x$ studies, despite its sizable stabilization of ~200 meV per hydride comparable to reported anion-migration and polaron-formation energies. This study addresses both the previously underexplored sensitivity of CE-based ordering analyses to DFT+$U$ and anion-ordering in perovskite oxyhydrides.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20885 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Anion configurational complexity and the associated DFT+ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Workflow for resolving DFT+U sensitivity and constructing converged CE with HSE06 energetics. This framework first yields an intermediate output CE1 trained on the ordering energetics of 531 structures with diverse configurations, selected by active learning from a configuration space of 354,326 structures, with DFT+U (U = 3.3 eV on Ti, also denoted as proxy-U where convenient) used as an HSE06 proxy determined in t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the clusters included in Equation 2. The sites included in each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: PBE+U Sensitivity on ordering stability and HSE06 proxy derivation. (a) Convex hull construction over the composition range from O to O2H (with the lowest-energy O2H ordering as the H-rich side reference) constructed by the default CE approach using ATAT and plain PBE …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The proxy-U CE results. (a) DFT convex hull and CE predictions, with the correct orderings on the hull reproduced and a 10-fold CV score of 13.0 meV/anion. The blue dotted line indicates the mixing energy of random configurations at each composition predicted by the CE…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HSE06 results, with (a) the convex hull compared with proxy- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Anion ordering analysis. (a) The Ti-H and Ti-O bonding framework of ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MC sampling octahedral probabilities from both proxy- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The histogram of the average for the octahedral fraction for structures classified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Nature materials , volume=

    An oxyhydride of BaTiO3 exhibiting hydride exchange and electronic conductivity , author=. Nature materials , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  2. [2]

    Inorganic chemistry , volume=

    Oxyhydrides of (Ca, Sr, Ba) TiO3 Perovskite Solid Solutions , author=. Inorganic chemistry , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  3. [3]

    Nature communications , volume=

    Expanding frontiers in materials chemistry and physics with multiple anions , author=. Nature communications , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  4. [4]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Titanium-based hydrides as heterogeneous catalysts for ammonia synthesis , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    Advanced Energy Materials , volume=

    Metal-dependent support effects of oxyhydride-supported Ru, Fe, Co catalysts for ammonia synthesis , author=. Advanced Energy Materials , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  6. [6]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=

    Highly Correlated Hydride Ion Tracer Diffusion in SrTiO3--x H x Oxyhydrides , author=. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  7. [7]

    polaron: vibrational motion and chemical expansion of hydride ions as signatures for the electronic character in oxyhydride barium titanate , author=

    Band vs. polaron: vibrational motion and chemical expansion of hydride ions as signatures for the electronic character in oxyhydride barium titanate , author=. Journal of Materials Chemistry A , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  8. [8]

    Unraveling the electronic control of hydride-ion diffusivity in oxyhydrides from model studies on BaTiO _

    Fine, Lucas and Karlsson, Maths and Panas, Itai and Koza, Michael Marek , journal=. Unraveling the electronic control of hydride-ion diffusivity in oxyhydrides from model studies on BaTiO _. 2025 , publisher=

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Nature chemistry , volume=

    Anion order in perovskite oxynitrides , author=. Nature chemistry , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  2. [10]

    Physical Review , volume=

    An approximate theory of order in alloys , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1950 , publisher=

  3. [11]

    Physical Review , volume=

    Short-and long-range order parameters in disordered solid solutions , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1960 , publisher=

  4. [12]

    npj Computational Materials , volume=

    Anion order in oxysulfide perovskites: origins and implications , author=. npj Computational Materials , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  5. [13]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=

    Generalized cluster description of multicomponent systems , author=. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

  6. [14]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    First-principles statistical mechanics of structural stability of intermetallic compounds , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

  7. [15]

    Solid state physics , volume=

    Cluster approach to order-disorder transformations in alloys , author=. Solid state physics , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

  8. [16]

    Journal of Phase Equilibria , volume=

    Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations , author=. Journal of Phase Equilibria , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  9. [17]

    Calphad , volume=

    The alloy theoretic automated toolkit: A user guide , author=. Calphad , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  10. [18]

    Advanced Theory and Simulations , volume=

    ICET--a Python library for constructing and sampling alloy cluster expansions , author=. Advanced Theory and Simulations , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  11. [19]

    Proceedings of the 25th

    Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework , author=. Proceedings of the 25th

  12. [20]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00772 , year=

    The CMA evolution strategy: A tutorial , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00772 , year=

  14. [22]

    Physical review , volume=

    Inhomogeneous electron gas , author=. Physical review , volume=. 1964 , publisher=

  15. [23]

    Physical review , volume=

    Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects , author=. Physical review , volume=. 1965 , publisher=

  16. [24]

    Physical review B , volume=

    Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems , author=. Physical review B , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

  17. [25]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume=

    First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+ U method , author=. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  18. [26]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    First-principles prediction of redox potentials in transition-metal compounds with LDA+ U , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

  19. [27]

    Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=

    Some fundamental issues in ground-state density functional theory: A guide for the perplexed , author=. Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  20. [28]

    International Journal of Quantum Chemistry , volume=

    Hubbard-corrected DFT energy functionals: The LDA+ U description of correlated systems , author=. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  21. [29]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Perspective: Treating electron over-delocalization with the DFT+ U method , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  22. [30]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Mott transition and suppression of orbital fluctuations in orthorhombic 3 d 1 perovskites , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

  23. [31]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Oxygen Vacancy Clustering and Electron Localization in Oxygen-Deficient SrTiO 3: LDA+ U Study , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  24. [32]

    Physical Review Materials , volume=

    Peierls-like distortion drives anion ordering in rutile TiOF , author=. Physical Review Materials , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  25. [33]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

  26. [34]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

  27. [35]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  28. [36]

    JOM , volume=

    Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD) , author=. JOM , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  29. [37]

    npj Comput

    The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies , author=. npj Comput. Mater. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  30. [38]

    APL Mater

    Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation , author=. APL Mater. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  31. [39]

    Computational Materials Science , volume=

    AFLOW: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery , author=. Computational Materials Science , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  32. [40]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Local environment dependent GGA+ U method for accurate thermochemistry of transition metal compounds , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  33. [41]

    Physical Review Materials , volume=

    Anomalous reversal of stability in Mo-containing oxides: A difficult case exhibiting sensitivity to DFT+ U and distortion , author=. Physical Review Materials , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  34. [42]

    Acs Catalysis , volume=

    Performance of DFT+ U approaches in the study of catalytic materials , author=. Acs Catalysis , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  35. [43]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Formation enthalpies by mixing GGA and GGA+ U calculations , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  36. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21056 , year=

    Better without U: Impact of Selective Hubbard U Correction on Foundational MLIPs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21056 , year=

  37. [45]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Cation and vacancy ordering in Li x CoO 2 , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  38. [46]

    Advanced Energy Materials , volume=

    Computational design and preparation of cation-disordered oxides for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries , author=. Advanced Energy Materials , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  39. [47]

    Nature communications , volume=

    Hidden structural and chemical order controls lithium transport in cation-disordered oxides for rechargeable batteries , author=. Nature communications , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  40. [48]

    ACS nano , volume=

    Screening Na-Excess Cation-Disordered Rocksalt Cathodes with High Performance , author=. ACS nano , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  41. [49]

    2019 , publisher=

    Ouyang, Bin and Chakraborty, Tanmoy and Kim, Namhoon and Perry, Nicola H and Mueller, Tim and Aluru, Narayana R and Ertekin, Elif , journal=. 2019 , publisher=

  42. [50]

    AIP conference proceedings , volume=

    Jacob’s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy , author=. AIP conference proceedings , volume=. 2001 , organization=

  43. [51]

    The journal of physical chemistry letters , volume=

    Accurate and numerically efficient r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation , author=. The journal of physical chemistry letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  44. [52]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  45. [53]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  46. [54]

    Martin, Richard M. , year=. Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods , publisher=

  47. [55]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Hybrid density functional calculations of redox potentials and formation energies of transition metal compounds , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  48. [56]

    Electronic Structure , volume=

    Fast hybrid density-functional computations using plane-wave basis sets , author=. Electronic Structure , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  49. [57]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Localization and Delocalization Errors in Density Functional Theory and Implications for Band-Gap Prediction , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  50. [58]

    Science , volume=

    Insights into current limitations of density functional theory , author=. Science , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  51. [59]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    SrTiO 3 and BaTiO 3 revisited using the projector augmented wave method: Performance of hybrid and semilocal functionals , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  52. [60]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Strain effects on the electronic structure of SrTiO 3: Toward high electron mobilities , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  53. [61]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Modeling of the cubic and antiferrodistortive phases of SrTiO 3 with screened hybrid density functional theory , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  54. [62]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume=

    Neutral defects in SrTiO3 studied with screened hybrid density functional theory , author=. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  55. [63]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=

    Structural phase transitions of the metal oxide perovskites SrTiO 3, LaAlO 3, and LaTiO 3 studied with a screened hybrid functional , author=. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  56. [64]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals , author=. Phys. Rev. B , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

  57. [65]

    Computational materials science , volume=

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set , author=. Computational materials science , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  58. [66]

    Physical review B , volume=

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set , author=. Physical review B , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  59. [67]

    Physical review B , volume=

    Projector augmented-wave method , author=. Physical review B , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

  60. [68]

    Physical review b , volume=

    From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method , author=. Physical review b , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  61. [69]

    Available pseudopotentials , howpublished =

  62. [70]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  63. [71]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

  64. [72]

    1991 , publisher=

    Alloy theory and its applications to long period superstructure ordering in metallic alloys and high-temperature superconductors , author=. 1991 , publisher=

  65. [73]

    1992 , publisher=

    Cluster expansion of fcc Pd-V intermetallics , author=. 1992 , publisher=

  66. [74]

    Short-Range Order and Li _

    Liu, Tzu-chen and Torrisi, Steven B and Wolverton, Chris , journal=. Short-Range Order and Li _. 2026 , publisher=

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.