Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 141 references

A power-law estimator built from emission measure and neutral hydrogen turns Faraday rotation data into galaxy magnetic field maps accurate to about a tenth of a dex.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:46 UTC pith:LNF53U7P

load-bearing objection Solid simulation-based calibration of DM estimators for RM-derived B-fields, with honest caveats; the 0.1 dex accuracy is in-sample, so treat as lower limit until validated on independent simulations. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20985 v1 pith:LNF53U7P submitted 2026-07-23 astro-ph.GA

Accurate Extragalactic Magnetic Fields from Faraday Rotation with Optimal Dispersion Measure Estimators

Hilay Shah , Mark Krumholz , Naomi McClure-Griffiths , Zipeng Hu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Faraday rotation measuredispersion measuregalactic magnetic fieldsemission measureneutral hydrogen column densityMHD simulationsradiative transferLMC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that an observer with reasonably accurate measurements of emission measure (EM) and, optionally, neutral hydrogen column density can convert Faraday rotation measures into electron-density-weighted magnetic field strengths with RMS errors of roughly 0.1 dex. This is achieved by a simple power-law estimator, DM = K·EM^α·N_Hi^β, with environment-dependent coefficients α ≈ 0.2–0.4 and β ≈ 0–0.1. The result matters because dispersion measures are usually not directly measurable for extragalactic sources, yet they are required to turn rotation measures into magnetic fields. If the claim holds, next-generation polarimetric surveys can produce accurate extragalactic magnetic field maps without direct DM measurements, using only EM and 21-cm data.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the electron column density needed to convert a Faraday rotation measure into a magnetic field can be predicted from emission measure and neutral hydrogen column density via a power law. Using radiative-transfer post-processing of three MHD galaxy simulations—an isolated Milky Way-like spiral, an isolated LMC-like dwarf, and a dwarf undergoing ram-pressure stripping—the authors fit the exponents and find α ≈ 0.2–0.4 and β ≈ 0–0.1 depending on environment (galaxy centre vs outskirts, dwarf vs spiral). The resulting predicted electron-density-weighted line-of-sight magnetic fields have RMS errors σ_χ ≈ 0.05–0.11 dex when both EM and N_Hi are used, a

What carries the argument

The central object is the double power-law DM estimator, DM = K·EM^α·N_Hi^β, equivalently expressed as a predicted field B_s,pred = (RM)/(k_RM·K·EM^α·N_Hi^β). The coefficients α, β, and K are fit to simulated galaxies; α ≈ 0.2–0.4, β ≈ 0–0.1, and K is related to the clumping factor, path length, and electron density. This estimator carries the argument: it turns a known RM plus easily observed EM and N_Hi into a field estimate, and its fitted exponent α encodes the balance between changes in total electron column and changes in electron clumping along sightlines.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the three simulated galaxies—an isolated spiral, an isolated dwarf, and a stripped dwarf—are representative of real galaxies targeted by RM observers in their magnetic field geometry, ionisation structure, and gas clumping; if real galaxies differ in these properties, the fitted exponents and the claimed accuracies will not transfer.

What would settle it

Compare the estimator's predicted magnetic fields against directly measured fields in a real galaxy where pulsar DMs exist, e.g., the LMC: measure RM and EM toward many background sources, apply the paper's recommended α, β, K for an isolated dwarf, and compute the RMS scatter between predicted and true B_s (true B_s from RM/DM using pulsar DMs). If the scatter significantly exceeds ~0.1 dex, or if the best-fit α differs from the recommended value by more than the fitting uncertainty, the calibration is not portable.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Observers with EM data can recover electron-density-weighted line-of-sight magnetic fields with RMS errors below about 0.1 dex using the recommended parameters in Table 8.
  • When EM is available, N_Hi adds essentially no accuracy (β ≈ 0) and can be ignored; without EM, N_Hi gives roughly 0.2 dex accuracy, mainly in galaxy outskirts.
  • In regions where neither EM nor N_Hi is available, adopting a fixed mean DM (α=β=0) yields roughly 0.3 dex accuracy, still better than several commonly used literature models.
  • Literature estimators such as DM ∝ N_Hi or DM ∝ EM/N_Hi fail badly because their assumptions of well-mixed phases or fully ionised skins are not satisfied in the simulations.
  • If a few direct DM measurements are available along sightlines, calibrating K instead of adopting the simulated values improves accuracy further.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fitted exponents are computed in-sample on the same simulations used to derive them, so the claimed ~0.1 dex accuracy may not hold out of sample; an independent calibration on a real galaxy with pulsar DMs would be a sharper test.
  • The exponent α is physically interpretable as a measure of how strongly the electron clumping factor correlates with emission measure; if real galaxies have very different clumping behaviour, α will shift and the recommended parameters will need revision.
  • The same power-law machinery could be inverted: given RM maps and independent field estimates (e.g., from synchrotron polarisation), one could measure the clumping factor of the ionised medium, extending the method from field recovery to ISM structure diagnostics.
  • Since RM and DM are both line-of-sight integrals, the estimator might also help separate Milky Way foreground contributions from extragalactic signals in fast radio burst dispersion measure budgets, although the paper does not address this.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses three MHD simulations (an isolated Milky Way-like galaxy, an isolated LMC-like dwarf, and an LMC-like dwarf undergoing ram-pressure stripping) to calibrate power-law estimators that convert Faraday rotation measures (RM) into electron-density-weighted magnetic field strengths by predicting the dispersion measure (DM). The proposed estimator has the form DM = K EM^alpha N_HI^beta, with exponents alpha ~ 0.2–0.4 and beta ~ 0–0.1 depending on galactic environment. The authors compute mock emission measures, H I column densities, 21 cm optical depths, and spin temperatures through radiative transfer, fit the free parameters with scipy.optimize.curve_fit, and report RMS scatters in the recovered magnetic field of sigma_chi ~ 0.05–0.1 dex for the free-alpha/beta model. They also compare against five existing literature recipes, present a physical interpretation of alpha in terms of clumping factors, and provide a 'recommended practice' table (Table 8) for observers. The central claim is that observers can recover electron-density-weighted magnetic fields to ~0.1 dex using the calibrated power-law estimator.

Significance. If the claimed accuracy transfers to real galaxies, this would be a genuinely useful, immediately actionable calibration for upcoming RM surveys (SKA, POSSUM). The paper's strengths include a well-documented mock-observation pipeline, a physically motivated interpretation of the fit exponents in terms of clumping factors and path lengths (Section 4.1), and a robustness appendix (Appendix A) that checks resolution, inclination, and sample size. The simulation data are publicly available, and the comparison against traditional recipes (Section 4.3) is tangible. However, the headline accuracy figures are computed on the same sightlines used to fit the model, and the transferability to real galaxies is not validated. The paper's own Section 4.5 states that the uncertainties are 'lower limits' and that the simulations lack a realistic CGM in two of three cases. The physical interpretation of alpha is plausible but relies on the same in-sample fits.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (21) and Tables 3–6] The sigma_chi values reported in Tables 3–6 are in-sample residuals: the same sightlines that are fed to scipy.optimize.curve_fit to determine alpha, beta, and log K are then used to evaluate the RMS deviation of log|B_s| from log|B_s,pred|. Thus the claim of '~0.1 dex accuracy' is a measure of goodness-of-fit, not predictive accuracy. The intended use—applying Table 8 to real galaxies—requires out-of-sample validation, e.g., leave-one-galaxy-out cross-validation across MW-I, LMC-I, and LMC-W, or at least bootstrap resampling to report parameter uncertainties. Without such tests, the error bars on the headline accuracy figure are not established.
  2. [Tables 3, 5, 8; Section 4.4] The best-fit parameters alpha, beta, and log K are reported with no uncertainties. Appendix A3 shows that the sigma_chi minimum is broad in alpha (roughly ±0.05) and very flat near beta = 0; this lack of quoted parameter covariance means an observer cannot assess how sensitive the recommended values are to the choice of environment class (central vs. outskirts, spiral vs. dwarf vs. interacting). The 'recommended practice' in Table 8 is stated as a fixed recipe, but the paper provides no error bars on the coefficients themselves, making it impossible to evaluate the robustness of the recommended values.
  3. [Section 4.5 and Section 2.1] The transferability of the calibration rests on three simulations, two of which lack a circumgalactic medium. The paper itself states that MW-I and LMC-I 'were not designed to be accurate far from the galactic centre' and that MW-I has a 'sharp edge' leading to poor outskirts sampling. Since the recommended parameters differ between central and outskirts regions and the CGM is expected to dominate at large radii, the sigma_chi values for the outskirts (especially MW-I) are based on a small, potentially unrepresentative sample. This is explicitly acknowledged in Section 4.5, but the abstract and conclusions do not carry this caveat when stating the 'few tenths of a dex' accuracy. The authors should either add an independent simulation with a realistic CGM or restrict the accuracy claim to environments that are simulated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Equation (1)] In the integral vector, 'true Hicolumn density' is associated with n_H0, but the text later describes n_H0 as 'free atomic, neutral hydrogen'. The notation is confusing: n_H0 usually denotes neutral atomic hydrogen density, while the text speaks of 'true Hicolumn'. Clarify the definition (e.g., use n_HI explicitly).
  2. [Section 2.2.3] The sentence 'We take a fairly conservative approach to this culling process' is clear, but the thresholds for EM and N_HI are stated without a single table; a small table summarizing the adopted detection limits would improve readability.
  3. [Section 3.2, text near Eq. (20)] The units of K in Eq. (20) are written as 'pc^{1-alpha} cm^{6alpha+2beta-3}', but the following text says 'in conventional units' without fully defining the normalization of N_HI (10^20 cm^-2) in the same line. The normalization is clear from Eq. (20), but a short parenthetical would help.
  4. [Appendix A, Figure A3] The contour plots show sigma_chi as a function of alpha and beta for a fixed log K optimized per grid point, but the caption does not state whether the optimization uses Eq. (A2) with the same data as the main fits. This should be made explicit.
  5. [Various] There are a few typographical slips: 'extrgalactic' in the Introduction, 'carry out carries out' in Appendix A, and 'whey' in Section 4.3. A final proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Claimed ~0.1 dex accuracy is the in-sample residual of the same fit that sets α, β, and K; no out-of-sample or cross-simulation validation supports transfer to real galaxies.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2 (Eqs. 20–21, Tables 3–6); abstract; Section 4.4]
    "The remaining task then is to measure the free parameters α, β, and log K of the model. For this purpose we use scipy.optimize.curve_fit to find the best non-linear least squares fit for the model given by Equation 20, using as input data the true values of B_s and the observables RM, EM, and N_Hi,obs. ... For each model variation, in addition to reporting the best-fit parameters, we also quantify how well that model performs by computing the RMS error σχ = [1/N_LOS Σ (log B_s − log B_s,pred)^2]^{1/2}, where N_LOS is the number of sightlines fit."

    The same sightlines that are fed to scipy.optimize.curve_fit to determine α, β, and log K also constitute the N_LOS used in Eq. 21. B_s,pred is Eq. 20 evaluated at the best-fit parameters on those same sightlines, so σχ is the training residual of a least-squares fit, minimized by construction with respect to the fitted parameters. The abstract's headline accuracy ('accurate to a few tenths of a dex') therefore reduces to the in-sample scatter of the calibrated model, not an independent predictive accuracy. No held-out sightlines, cross-simulation parameter transfer, or external magnetic-field benchmark is used to validate the quoted errors; Appendix A re-fits parameters on additional simulations rather than testing fixed parameters, and Section 4.5 only notes the errors are 'lower limits'

full rationale

The derivation chain is: B_s = RM/(k_RM DM) (Eq. 17); DM is modeled as K EM^α N_HI^β (Eq. 18); α, β, and K are fit by least squares to the true B_s and observables on each simulation; and the reported accuracy σχ (Eq. 21) is computed over the same sightlines. Thus the central numerical claim—'accurate to a few tenths of a dex'—is the training error of the proposed estimator, not a validated out-of-sample prediction. The Appendix A robustness tests re-fit the model on additional simulations and therefore do not test transfer of a fixed parameter set. The comparison to literature models in Section 4.3 is more independent, but the best-practice parameters in Table 8 are tuned in-sample. Section 4.5 explicitly flags several caveats: it calls the uncertainties 'lower limits' and asks other theorists to test the scaling relations, acknowledging the lack of external validation. These limitations do not make the paper circular in the sense of self-definition or self-citation; the physical interpretation of α via the clumping factor is a post-hoc consistency check, and the simulations are legitimate independent inputs. However, the quoted accuracy is statistically forced by being the residual of the same fit that defines the model, warranting a partial-circularity score of 6 rather than a clean bill of health.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central model has three fitted parameters (alpha, beta, logK) calibrated on simulation data. The main assumptions are that the simulated galaxies and the radiative-transfer post-processing faithfully represent real observables, and that the power-law form is sufficient. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (EM exponent) = 0.22-0.44 (varies by galaxy and region)
    Fitted to simulated DM vs EM and N_Hi data; central driver of DM prediction accuracy.
  • beta (N_Hi exponent) = -0.14 to 0.17 (near zero when EM available)
    Fitted to simulated data; captures marginal additional predictive power of N_Hi.
  • logK (normalisation) = 1.29 to 2.10 (in conventional units)
    Fitted per galaxy and region; sets absolute DM scale.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The gizmo MHD simulations (MFM, Grackle chemistry, Cloudy post-processing) produce realistic ISM magnetic fields and ionisation structure.
    Central to all mock observables; Section 2.1 describes the setup, but the transfer to real galaxies is assumed.
  • domain assumption The radiative transfer post-processing approximations (constant T=10^4 K for EM inversion, optically thin 21 cm, no dust extinction for H-alpha) are adequate for deriving mock observables.
    Section 2.2.2 and Section 4.5; affects the fidelity of EM and N_Hi estimates.
  • domain assumption The power-law model DM=K EM^alpha N_Hi^beta is sufficiently flexible to capture the DM-proxy relation.
    Assumed in Section 3.2; the paper tests limited special cases but does not justify the functional form beyond empirical fit quality.
  • standard math The clumping factor relation DM = f_c^{-1/2} L_p^{1/2} EM^{1/2} (Gnedin & Ostriker 1997) is used for physical interpretation.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 to interpret alpha; an established relation.
  • domain assumption The simulated LMC and MW analogues are representative of their real counterparts.
    Section 4.5 acknowledges CGM is missing in two simulations; without representativeness the recommended coefficients do not generalise.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 32665 in / 10840 out tokens · 115679 ms · 2026-08-01T08:46:36.550270+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Faraday rotation measures (RMs) are one of our few observational tools for measuring magnetic field strengths in extragalactic systems, but converting an RM to a magnetic field estimate requires knowledge of the electron column density -- the dispersion measure (DM) -- to the RM source. Because DMs are difficult to measure for most extragalactic radio galaxies, observers have adopted a range of strategies to estimate them from more easily measured quantities, but the accuracy of these approaches is poorly known. To address this, we carry out simulated observations of high-resolution magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a range of galactic environments to explore the performance of various possible DM estimators. We obtain the best results using an estimator $\mathrm{DM} \propto \mathrm{EM}^{\alpha} \ N_\mathrm{Hi}^{\beta}$, where EM is the emission measure and $N_\mathrm{Hi}$ is the atomic hydrogen column density, with exponents $\alpha \approx 0.2-0.4$ and $\beta \approx 0-0.1$ depending on galactic environment (e.g., galaxy centres versus outskirts, and dwarfs versus spirals). We show that the variation of these exponents with environment can be understood in terms of simple physical arguments. Based on our tests, we provide recommended best practices for extracting galactic magnetic fields from RM data as a function of galactic environment and of proxy data availability, and show that using these methods one can obtain field measurements that are accurate to a few tenths of a dex. This work therefore represents an important step toward making use of RM data from next-generation surveys with the SKA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20985 by Hilay Shah, Mark Krumholz, Naomi McClure-Griffiths, Zipeng Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ionisation fractions 𝑋𝑒 of all sightlines through different galaxies – MW-I, LMC-I, and LMC-W (columns) – as a function of the deprojected radius. The blue line shows the average ionisation fraction in bins of 100 data points when sorted from minimum to maximum deprojected radii. The red vertical line indicates the deprojected radius at which the linearly interpolated average ionisation fraction is 0.6, ou… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Scatter plots of DM versus EMfb,obs, EMff,obs, 𝑁H i,obs, 𝑇spin,min, and 𝜏max (columns, left to right) for the galaxies MW-I, LMC-I, and LMC-W (rows, top to bottom). Black points show sightlines through the central ISM, and red points show sightlines through the outskirts. Green vertical bands mark the range of parameter values that we consider detectable (see Section 2.2.3). The panel text lists the total … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: True LOS-averaged magnetic field strength |𝐵𝑠 | versus predicted strength |𝐵𝑠,pred | using best-fitting values of the fit parameters 𝛼, 𝛽, and 𝐾, for our three different simulations (MW-I, LMC-I, LMC-W– top to bottom rows) and for three sets of inputs (true EM and H i column, left; optical-derived EMfb and observationally-inferred H i column 𝑁H i,obs, middle; radio-derived EMff and observationally-inferred… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relationship between emission measure EM and clumping factor 𝑓𝑐 for all sightlines. The three columns show each of our three simulations, while the top and bottom rows show the central and outskirts regions, respectively. Annotations in each panel indicate the best linear fit and the Spearman rank correlation of the data shown, and the grey dashed lines show the best linear fit. MW-I-central, 0.34 for LMC-… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Neutral hydrogen density (or mass) weighted magnetic field (Equation 24) versus electron density weighted magnetic fields (Equation 16) for the three simulations (columns left to right). Black (red) points show values from central (outskirts) sightlines. The grey dashed lines show the one-to-one relation. spiral structure. In this case the model predicts an electron density 𝑛𝑒 (𝑟, 𝑧) = 𝑛0 sech2 𝑟 20 kpc se… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: True simulation magnetic fields (y-axis) versus magnetic fields predicted by five literature models (x-axis; outlined in Section 4.3) when applied to our simulations. The title of each panel displays the unscaled 𝜎𝜒-error (left of arrow) and the best possible 𝜎𝜒-error for that model (right of arrow), which is obtained by scaling the predicted magnetic fields by a factor 𝑐. outskirts based on (in decreasing… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability

  2. [2]

    doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00007 , eid =

    2019 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00007 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1902.02557 , journal =

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2601 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2601 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2601

  4. [4]

    arXiv , author =:2504.09701 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451477 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2504.09701 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2811 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2811 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2811

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Polarized dust emission in Arp220: magnetic fields in the core of an ultraluminous infrared Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae107 , archivePrefix =. 2412.14770 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Submillimetre observations of the two-component magnetic field in M82

    Kate Pattle and Walter Gear and Matt Redman and Smith, \ Matthew W.L.\ and Jane Greaves. Submillimetre observations of the two-component magnetic field in M82. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1300

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1300 2021

  8. [8]

    and Ntormousi, Evangelia and Tassis, Konstantinos and Dale, Daniel A

    Lopez-Rodriguez, Enrique and Mao, Sui Ann and Beck, Rainer and Borlaff, Alejandro S. and Ntormousi, Evangelia and Tassis, Konstantinos and Dale, Daniel A. and Roman-Duval, Julia and Subramanian, Kandaswamy and Martin-Alvarez, Sergio and Marcum, Pamela M. and Clark, Susan E. and Reach, William T. and Harper, Doyal A. and Zweibel, Ellen G. , title =. The As...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7f9d 2022

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    The magnetized disk-halo transition region of M 51. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037847 , archivePrefix =. 2007.00702 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    2019 , month = may, publisher =

    Suoqing Ji and S Peng Oh and Phillip Masterson , title =. 2019 , month = may, publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1248 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1248 2019

  11. [11]

    The effect of magnetic fields on properties of the circumgalactic medium , journal =

    Freeke van de Voort and Rebekka Bieri and R\". The effect of magnetic fields on properties of the circumgalactic medium , journal =. 2021 , month = jan, publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3938 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3938 2021

  12. [12]

    2023 , month = oct, publisher =

    Hitesh Kishore Das and Max Gronke , title =. 2023 , month = oct, publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3125 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3125 2023

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Understanding gas mixing in the circumgalactic medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1066 , archivePrefix =. 2505.21980 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    , title =

    Zweibel, Ellen G. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4984017 , url =

    doi:10.1063/1.4984017 2017

  15. [15]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Thomas, Timon and Pfrommer, Christoph and Enßlin, Torsten , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7237 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7237 2020

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Effects of Magnetic Fields on Gas Dynamics and Star Formation in Nuclear Rings. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc250 , archivePrefix =. 2303.04206 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Modified angular momentum transport and feedback

    The impact of magnetic fields on cosmological galaxy mergers - II. Modified angular momentum transport and feedback. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2680 , archivePrefix =. 2301.13208 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , author=

    Role of magnetic field in star formation , volume=. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , author=. 2018 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S1743921319003909 , number=

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921319003909 2018

  19. [19]

    Wood and Paul J

    Amit Seta and Anvar Shukurov and Toby S. Wood and Paul J. Bushby and Andrew P. Snodin , title =. 2017 , month = oct, publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2606 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2606 2017

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic-Ray-driven Outflows from the Large Magellanic Cloud: Contributions to the LMC Filament. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa3 , archivePrefix =. 1911.02021 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  21. [21]

    Radiation-magnetohydrodynamics simulations of cosmic ray feedback in disc galaxies , journal =

    Marion Farcy and Joakim Rosdahl and Yohan Dubois and J. Radiation-magnetohydrodynamics simulations of cosmic ray feedback in disc galaxies , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1196 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1196

  22. [22]

    apj , keywords =

    The Impact of Cosmic Rays on the Kinematics of the Circumgalactic Medium. apj , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ebd , archivePrefix =. 2106.14889 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Girma, Eden and Teyssier, Romain , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3640 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3640 2023

  24. [24]

    and Spitzer, L., Jr , title =

    Mestel, L. and Spitzer, L., Jr , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 1956 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/116.5.503 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/116.5.503 1956

  25. [25]

    and Adams, Fred C

    Shu, Frank H. and Adams, Fred C. and Lizano, Susana. Star Formation in Molecular Clouds: Observation and Theory. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.000323

    arXiv 1987

  26. [27]

    and McKee, Christopher F

    Krumholz, Mark R. and McKee, Christopher F. and Bland-Hawthorn, Joss. Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430 2019

  27. [28]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Dobbs, C L and Wurster, J , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab150 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab150 2021

  28. [29]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Yaghoobi, A and Tabatabaei, F and Rosdahl, J and Commercon, B and Sheikhnezami, S and Calura, F , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1249 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1249 2025

  29. [30]

    Gaensler and R

    B.M. Gaensler and R. Beck and L. Feretti , abstract =. The origin and evolution of cosmic magnetism , journal =. 2004 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2004.09.003 , url =

    doi:10.1016/j.newar.2004.09.003 2004

  30. [31]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Wang, Peng and Abel, Tom , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/96 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/96 2009

  31. [32]

    probing the role of the magnetic field in the formation of structure in molecular clouds , author=

    Planck intermediate results-xxxv. probing the role of the magnetic field in the formation of structure in molecular clouds , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  32. [33]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    On the universality of interstellar filaments: theory meets simulations and observations , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  33. [34]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Gómez, Gilberto C and Vázquez-Semadeni, Enrique and Zamora-Avilés, Manuel , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2018 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2018 2018

  34. [35]

    VERSCHUUR, G. L. , year =. Further Measurements of Magnetic Fields in Interstellar Clouds of Neutral Hydrogen , volume =. Nature , publisher =. doi:10.1038/223140a0 , number =

    work page doi:10.1038/223140a0

  35. [36]

    , year = 1969, month = jun, volume =

    Measurements of Magnetic Fields in Interstellar Clouds of Neutral Hydrogen. , year = 1969, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1086/150020 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/150020 1969

  36. [37]

    Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies , year = 2009, editor =

    Zeeman splitting in the diffuse interstellar medium-The Milky Way and beyond. Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies , year = 2009, editor =. doi:10.1017/S174392130903141X , adsurl =

    doi:10.1017/s174392130903141x 2009

  37. [38]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Shah, Hilay and Krumholz, Mark R and McClure-Griffiths, N M , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1003 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1003 2025

  38. [39]

    , keywords =

    On the limitations of H luminosity as a star formation tracer in spatially resolved observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2241 , archivePrefix =. 2406.11155 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [40]

    The sub-critical illusion: synthetic Zeeman effect observations from galactic zoom-in simulations , volume =

    Hu, Zipeng and Wibking, Benjamin D and Krumholz, Mark R , year =. The sub-critical illusion: synthetic Zeeman effect observations from galactic zoom-in simulations , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad931 , number =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad931

  40. [41]

    , keywords =

    The global structure of magnetic fields and gas in simulated Milky Way-analogue galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2648 , archivePrefix =. 2105.04136 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [42]

    , keywords =

    A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv195 , archivePrefix =. 1409.7395 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [43]

    and Raives, Matthias J

    Hopkins, Philip F. and Raives, Matthias J. , year =. Accurate, meshless methods for magnetohydrodynamics , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2180 , number =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2180

  43. [44]

    , year =

    Hopkins, Philip F. , year =. A constrained-gradient method to control divergence errors in numerical MHD , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1578 , number =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1578

  44. [45]

    Metal cooling in simulations of cosmic structure formation , volume =

    Smith, Britton and Sigurdsson, Steinn and Abel, Tom , year =. Metal cooling in simulations of cosmic structure formation , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12922.x , number =

    arXiv 2008

  45. [46]

    and Bryan, Greg L

    Smith, Britton D. and Bryan, Greg L. and Glover, Simon C. O. and Goldbaum, Nathan J. and Turk, Matthew J. and Regan, John and Wise, John H. and Schive, Hsi-Yu and Abel, Tom and Emerick, Andrew and O’Shea, Brian W. and Anninos, Peter and Hummels, Cameron B. and Khochfar, Sadegh , year =. grackle: a chemistry and cooling library for astrophysics , volume =....

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3291

  46. [47]

    , keywords =

    The 2023 Release of Cloudy. , keywords =. doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12 , archivePrefix =. 2308.06396 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [48]

    , year = 1998, month = jul, volume =

    CLOUDY 90: Numerical Simulation of Plasmas and Their Spectra. , year = 1998, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/316190 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/316190 1998

  48. [49]

    Radiative Transfer in a Clumpy Universe. IV. New Synthesis Models of the Cosmic UV/X-Ray Background. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125 , archivePrefix =. 1105.2039 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2039

  49. [50]

    , keywords =

    Neutral Atomic Phases of the Interstellar Medium in the Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/368016 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0207098 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [51]

    , keywords =

    The Effect of the Interstellar Model on Star Formation Properties in Galactic Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/523889 , archivePrefix =. 0709.1972 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1972

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    How to model supernovae in simulations of star and galaxy formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty674 , archivePrefix =. 1707.07010 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [53]

    and Kereš, Dušan and Oñorbe, José and Faucher-Giguère, Claude-André and Quataert, Eliot and Murray, Norman and Bullock, James S

    Hopkins, Philip F. and Kereš, Dušan and Oñorbe, José and Faucher-Giguère, Claude-André and Quataert, Eliot and Murray, Norman and Bullock, James S. , year =. Galaxies on FIRE (Feedback In Realistic Environments): stellar feedback explains cosmologically inefficient star formation , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =....

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1738

  53. [54]

    The life cycle of the Central Molecular Zone – I

    Armillotta, Lucia and Krumholz, Mark R and Di Teodoro, Enrico M and McClure-Griffiths, N M , year =. The life cycle of the Central Molecular Zone – I. Inflow, star formation, and winds , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2880 , number =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2880

  54. [55]

    The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later , year = 2005, editor =

    The Initial Mass Function: From Salpeter 1955 to 2005. The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later , year = 2005, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-3407-7_5 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0409465 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1955

  55. [56]

    and Fumagalli, Michele and da Silva, Robert L

    Krumholz, Mark R. and Fumagalli, Michele and da Silva, Robert L. and Rendahl, Theodore and Parra, Jonathan , year =. SLUG – stochastically lighting up galaxies – III. A suite of tools for simulated photometry, spectroscopy, and Bayesian inference with stochastic stellar populations , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher ...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1374

  56. [57]

    and Fumagalli, Michele and Krumholz, Mark , year =

    da Silva, Robert L. and Fumagalli, Michele and Krumholz, Mark , year =. SLUG—STOCHASTICALLY LIGHTING UP GALAXIES. I. METHODS AND VALIDATING TESTS , volume =. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/145 , number =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/145

  57. [58]

    Back to the Galaxy , year = 1993, editor =

    The warm ionized medium. Back to the Galaxy , year = 1993, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.44005 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.44005 1993

  58. [59]

    , year =

    Black, John H. , year =. Heating and Cooling of the Interstellar Gas , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3861-8_27 , booktitle =

    doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3861-8_27

  59. [60]

    Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

  60. [61]

    Stil, J. M. and Israel, F. P. , year =. Neutral hydrogen in dwarf galaxies: I. The spatial distribution of HI , volume =. Astronomy amp; Astrophysics , publisher =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020352 , number =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020352

  61. [62]

    On estimating the atomic hydrogen column density from the H<scp>i</scp> 21cm emission spectra , volume =

    Saha, Preetha and Roy, Nirupam and Bhattacharya, Mukul , year =. On estimating the atomic hydrogen column density from the H<scp>i</scp> 21cm emission spectra , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly139 , number =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly139

  62. [63]

    , keywords =

    H ^ + _ 3 in Diffuse Interstellar Clouds: A Tracer for the Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/523036 , archivePrefix =. 0709.1114 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    An iterative method for the construction of N-body galaxy models in collisionless equilibrium , volume =

    Yurin, Denis and Springel, Volker , year =. An iterative method for the construction of N-body galaxy models in collisionless equilibrium , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1421 , number =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1421

  64. [65]

    and Ceverino, Daniel and Choi, Jun-Hwan and Feldmann, Robert and Keller, Ben W

    Kim, Ji-hoon and Agertz, Oscar and Teyssier, Romain and Butler, Michael J. and Ceverino, Daniel and Choi, Jun-Hwan and Feldmann, Robert and Keller, Ben W. and Lupi, Alessandro and Quinn, Thomas and Revaz, Yves and Wallace, Spencer and Gnedin, Nickolay Y. and Leitner, Samuel N. and Shen, Sijing and Smith, Britton D. and Thompson, Robert and Turk, Matthew J...

    2016

  65. [66]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Springel, Volker and di Matteo, Tiziana and Hernquist, Lars , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x , url =

    arXiv 2005

  66. [67]

    , keywords =

    Observation of Turbulent Fluctuations in the Interstellar Plasma Density and Magnetic Field on Spatial Scales of 0.01 to 100 Parsecs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/176803 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/176803

  67. [68]

    , keywords =

    Ram Pressure Stripping of the Large Magellanic Cloud's Disk as a Probe of the Milky Way's Circumgalactic Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/77 , archivePrefix =. 1507.07935 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [69]

    , keywords =

    Magnetizing the circumgalactic medium of disc galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2530 , archivePrefix =. 1911.11163 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  69. [70]

    , keywords =

    Detection of magnetic fields in the circumgalactic medium of nearby galaxies using Faraday rotation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346008 , archivePrefix =. 2302.06617 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [71]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic fields in elliptical galaxies: using the Laing-Garrington effect in radio galaxies and polarized emission from background radio sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2500 , archivePrefix =. 2108.12793 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [72]

    and Kim, Woong-Tae , title =

    Kim, Chang-Goo and Ostriker, Eve C. and Kim, Woong-Tae , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/64 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/64 2014

  72. [73]

    Kaczmarek, J. F. and Purcell, C. R. and Gaensler, B. M. and McClure-Griffiths, N. M. and Stevens, J. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx206 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx206 2017

  73. [74]

    Astrophysics From Antarctica , year = 1998, editor =

    The WHAM H alpha Survey. Astrophysics From Antarctica , year = 1998, editor =

    1998

  74. [75]

    Haffner, L. M. and Reynolds, R. J. and Tufte, S. L. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1086/322867 , url =

    doi:10.1086/322867 2001

  75. [76]

    and McClure-Griffiths, Naomi and Gibson, Steven J

    Dickey, John M. and McClure-Griffiths, Naomi and Gibson, Steven J. and Gómez, José F. and Imai, Hiroshi and Jones, Paul and Stanimirović, Snežana and Van Loon, Jacco Th. and Walsh, Andrew and Alberdi, A. and et al. , year=. GASKAP—The Galactic ASKAP Survey , volume=. doi:10.1017/pasa.2012.003 , journal=

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2012.003 2012

  76. [77]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Nguyen, Hiep and McClure-Griffiths, N M and Dempsey, James and Dickey, John M and Lee, Min-Young and Lynn, Callum and Murray, Claire E and Stanimirović, Snežana and Busch, Michael P and Clark, Susan E and Dawson, J R and Dénes, Helga and Gibson, Steven and Jameson, Katherine and Joncas, Gilles and Kemp, Ian and Leahy, Denis and Ma, Yik Ki and Marchal, Ant...

    2024

  77. [78]

    The WSRT wide-field H I survey. II. Local Group features. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034423 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0312323 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [79]

    The Westerbork Hydrogen Accretion in LOcal GAlaxieS (HALOGAS) survey. I. Survey description and pilot observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015938 , archivePrefix =. 1012.0816 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [80]

    , keywords =

    THINGS: The H I Nearby Galaxy Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563 , archivePrefix =. 0810.2125 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [81]

    , keywords =

    MHONGOOSE: A MeerKAT nearby galaxy H I survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348297 , archivePrefix =. 2404.01774 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.