Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-01T08:46:17.594637Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 6 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 54 of 54 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.21010.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-01T08:46:17.594637Z
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-05T06:32:48.257954+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
54 of 54 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Observation ba862811-772a-4f4e-b97d-8401b36248bd · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers A comprehensive survey on legal summarization: Challenges and future directions
Reference 1
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4517b5ee-256d-4809-98e2-046cbb1cefde · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Large language models robustness against perturbation: S
Reference 2
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 79f977dd-d613-41a7-929e-e0a1eac5cea5 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Using llm (large language model) to improve efficiency in literature review for undergraduate research
Reference 3
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4c16b665-e324-4179-a1d2-9e266f785d28 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Robust tests for the equality of variances
Reference 4
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7d7d2ada-1917-4f51-a68e-cdf0e061cb7b · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Efficient inference for noisy llm-as-a-judge evaluation
Reference 5
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5d7adfc0-191e-41c0-84f9-cc58b96d029e · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 419922fc-7cf8-43b4-83f8-35130c2586e0 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets
Reference 7
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 35c44920-4697-49da-99a8-8f8c807b6887 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Applicability of large language models and generative models for legal case judgement summarization
Reference 8
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 34c92790-8a86-4ac3-94c8-19b2a16735ec · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Explainability meets text summarization: A survey, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Natural Language Generation Conference, pp
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation cabed90e-9dca-40e7-9d8c-2ea4f23e8236 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Consistency Evaluation of News Article Summaries Generated by Large (and Small) Language Models
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 809600eb-c6dd-4c0b-8520-469eb2391571 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 11
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5fb3496f-d1c1-427d-8a82-5f6890f80ebc · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 12
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation aba51b5b-1f25-4649-91a3-294785f454d0 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
Reference 13
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d060040c-c398-43a2-bf95-9d03be857d02 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 14
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 95f74450-44a6-4caf-a246-cc60b71ae1ab · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Consistency analysis of chatgpt, in: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp
Reference 15
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c3386394-0a16-4ba4-85ab-2f6af86a7628 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Context-Aware Sports Highlight Generation Leveraging Large Language Models
Reference 16
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7bd3b05b-7ab4-400f-8a84-06ac5f5d09a7 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 17
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 126b27e8-6410-4740-b003-af20fc2c6b6e · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Llms cannot reliably judge (yet?): A comprehensive assessment on the robustness of llm-as-a-judge
Reference 18
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e9df35f9-1f64-44ac-add0-315d9a909051 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Do not abstain! identify and solve the uncertainty, in: Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (V olume 1: Long Papers), pp
Reference 19
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4b6ac1fc-ceec-4945-83a1-0f0c3c5671c6 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Sumsurvey: An abstractive dataset of scientific survey papers for long document summarization, in: Findings of the ACL 2024, pp
Reference 20
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 343ff456-85ca-420d-abde-9d4959a2f7d4 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Low-resource court judgment summarization for common law systems
Reference 21
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e3b93c37-3db2-4232-a37d-e3c3a644c50d · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 22
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 10f62dba-8f8e-4273-a3e8-f9a326ee90f8 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Tools in the Loop: Quantifying Uncertainty of LLM Question Answering Systems That Use Tools
Reference 23
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f824fb54-7766-4edd-aa89-b918c519da33 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Effectiveness in retrieving legal precedents: exploring text summarization and cutting-edge language models toward a cost-efficient approach
Reference 24
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 06d89a72-c36d-4ab3-972a-98e481ec4533 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers State of what art? a call for multi-prompt llm evaluation
Reference 25
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b0193b8d-9fdb-48fd-922e-c76541e7a415 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence rnns and beyond, in: Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL conference on computational natural language learning, pp
Reference 26
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 202d3509-ebfc-412a-9779-072afd236e84 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Evaluating Variance in Visual Question Answering Benchmarks
Reference 27
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 974951f5-4266-4556-ab26-7c495e28da2b · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 28
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2f8529f4-8b82-46e4-a21f-bd02679036bd · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of llms, in: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp
Reference 29
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7cc65411-dfe0-4a9b-ba71-48ab1b18503e · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 30
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e60734a2-dc61-4c68-952b-2471bbe58cd7 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Leveraging large language models on the traditional scientific writing workflow, in: 2024 Conference on AI, Science, Engineering, and Technology (AIxSET), IEEE
Reference 31
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7ae50f9e-85e8-4705-b520-83a86618b120 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 32
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 16d23be8-631b-4a6b-8395-42dc8c138b97 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers How resilient are language models to text perturbations?, in: International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, Springer
Reference 33
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7de55c08-2825-4751-9ff4-6e4fcd5c413a · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Can You Trust LLM Judgments? Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 34
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 16003fb3-6a20-4e28-a272-1381f5281c10 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers A coin flip for safety: Llm judges fail to reliably measure adversarial robustness
Reference 35
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2d827d14-b1c1-4bd3-928a-5498c3224a70 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting
Reference 36
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b067281a-a2b1-40b2-8680-38783516dc41 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 37
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 03ef4978-01b3-4b3d-bb78-18fa5c883a29 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Robustness of large language models to perturbations in text
Reference 38
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation edb6d993-40e4-4486-88d7-22a441d7efb7 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Legal text summarization via judicial syllogism with large language models
Reference 39
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c3afb610-bf4a-44da-995a-d0367277be74 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Artificial intelligence risk management framework (ai rmf 1.0).(2023)
Reference 40
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3fe07b83-615a-413d-a7cb-e1c110969d97 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Evaluating the factual consistency of large language models through news summarization, in: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pp
Reference 41
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation aaf3ebbc-c2ec-49e6-a647-898ea236ded5 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 42
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 43e5511e-d97d-4d8b-89df-5a7c1429c8dd · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Prompt engineering in consistency and reliability with the evidence-based guideline for llms
Reference 43
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a1ea5236-7a7f-46ce-9374-8b81b6d1da4c · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Using llm-supported lecture summarization system to improve knowledge recall and student satisfaction
Reference 44
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ed5ebf97-8d16-4988-b3a8-d53c42bc02a2 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Comparisons of various types of normality tests
Reference 45
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4e76288c-eb55-4ac2-a35f-b22e8972999a · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Event-based evaluation of abstractive news summarization, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM2), pp
Reference 46
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9e5fd6cd-414d-4bc3-bcf3-e01497129cb9 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Alignscore: Evaluating factual consistency with a unified alignment function, in: Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the ACL (V olume 1: Long Papers), pp
Reference 47
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d92b3102-aed1-4c81-9747-fbfc74587ea9 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers A systematic survey of text summarization: From statistical methods to large language models
Reference 48
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 84908382-9703-49db-9ac0-85d915a637cf · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT
Reference 49
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation dc0fea92-c0bd-4775-8685-7f08ff666f63 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Benchmarking large language models for news summarization
Reference 50
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8dbd9767-522a-4ddd-89e7-84bfdc68063f · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Trustworthy evaluation of large language models
Reference 51
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5146d519-3232-4e64-a9ca-5721081d5061 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers A comprehensive survey on process-oriented automatic text summarization with exploration of llm-based methods
Reference 52
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 451aec2d-0551-4685-a02b-cbde61db5322 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Assessing the accuracy of artificial intelligence-generated clinical summaries from ambulatory glaucoma subspecialty clinical encounters
Reference 53
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b4f7f642-9430-4782-96af-eb8d3d58dd67 · outbound
Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers Unresolved cited work
Reference 54
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.