Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Magneto-Caloric effect and Multiple magnetic phases in Al doped Ni2MnSn0.75Al0.25 Heusler Alloys

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Aluminum substitution at one-quarter of the tin sites in Ni2MnSn creates a magnetic ground state in which ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic regions coexist, freeze into an interacting cluster glass near 40 K, and produce a ~110 Oe exchang

desk verdict New Heusler composition with plausible cluster-glass and exchange-bias behavior, but the B2-disorder mechanism and a suspiciously high Curie temperature need hard evidence before the central claims can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21181 v1 pith:2YGQV3LP submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Satya Vijay Kumar , Simran , Madhusmita Jena , Mehroosh Fatema , Atul Gangwar , Srishti Dixit , Umashankar Rajput , Nisha Shahi
show 4 more authors
Chetna Gautam Sanjay Singh Anup K. Ghosh Sandip Chatterjee
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords HeusleralloymagnetocaloriceffectreentrantclusterglassexchangebiasmartensitictransformationAlsubstitutionNi2MnSnmagneticphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that Al substitution at the Sn site of Ni2MnSn enriches the alloy's magnetic phase diagram without destroying its two key phase transitions. It claims that Ni2MnSn0.75Al0.25 orders ferromagnetically at about 734 K, undergoes a first-order martensitic transformation near 263 K, and below about 40 K enters a reentrant cluster-glass state arising from competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic exchange. The evidence includes frequency-dependent AC susceptibility, relaxation that fits a power-law cluster model rather than a stretched exponential, and a field-cooled hysteresis loop shifted by roughly 110 Oe. If correct, this single composition offers both a magnetocaloric response and an exchange-bias effect, which would be useful for magnetic refrigeration and spintronic applications.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the Al-induced Mn–Mn exchange modification: replacing 25% of Sn with smaller Al produces partial L21-to-B2 disorder, bringing some Mn–Mn separations down to about 0.291 nm where direct or superexchange antiferromagnetic coupling can occur, competing with the ferromagnetic background. The paper's diagnostic toolkit is frequency- and field-dependent AC susceptibility plus remanent-magnetization relaxation; the analysis of those data (frequency shift, critical slowing down, failure of the Arrhenius law, success of the Vogel–Fulcher law and the Ulrich power-law relaxation) is used to characterize the low-temperature state as an interacting reentrant clu

What would settle it

A quantitative two-phase Rietveld refinement of the X-ray pattern combined with XPS depth profiling would settle it: if the B2 phase fraction is negligible, or if ion etching removes the ~40 K AC susceptibility peak and the 5 K loop shift, then the central attribution of the glassy dynamics and exchange bias to an intrinsic reentrant cluster-glass state would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Al substitution, by introducing partial B2-type atomic disorder and shortening some Mn–Mn distances, changes the magnetic exchange landscape of Ni2MnSn: a strongly ferromagnetic austenite (TC ≈ 734 K, θCW = 746.4 K, μeff = 6.82 μB) gives way at 263 K to a first-order martensitic transformation that raises the magnetization, and below ~40 K the system freezes into an interacting reentrant cluster-glass state rather than a conventional spin glass or superparamagnet. The paper supports this with the Mydosh parameter p = 0.0414, critical slowing-down parameters τ0 ≈ 1.7 × 10⁻⁸ s and zν = 4.01, a Vogel–Fulcher fit with T0 = 34.5 K, and a Tholence parameter of 0.13. A ~11

Load-bearing premise

The low-temperature frequency-dependent freezing and the exchange-bias shift are assumed to come from the bulk alloy's intrinsic Al-induced ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic disorder, not from surface oxides or an unquantified secondary Pm-3m/B2 phase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The alloy is magnetocaloric at both ~263 K and ~734 K, with field exponents n ≈ 0.784 and 1.07, so it could serve as a refrigerant working across the martensitic-transition region.
  • The exchange-bias effect at 5 K (~110 Oe) demonstrates that FM/AFM interfaces are present and could be exploited in spin-valve-like devices.
  • The low-temperature magnetic state is an interacting cluster glass, not a conventional spin glass; the zero-field freezing temperature extrapolates to about 42.8 K from the de Almeida–Thouless fit.
  • The coexistence of L21 and B2 order means the magnetic ground state is tunable through Al content or annealing, providing a practical lever for adjusting the competing exchange interactions.
  • The strong magnetostructural coupling is confirmed by DSC, which shows a first-order endothermic anomaly near 272 K on heating, close to the magnetic signature at 263 K.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is a composition series Ni2MnSn1−xAlx: if the model is right, the exchange-bias field and cluster-glass freezing temperature should vary systematically with x as the B2-disorder fraction changes.
  • The de Almeida–Thouless fit implies that modest dc fields suppress the cluster-glass freezing, which is a testable prediction for field-dependent AC susceptibility and could matter for applications that operate under applied fields.
  • Since the paper reports surface oxidation in the XPS data, ion-etching the surface and repeating the low-field AC susceptibility and hysteresis-loop measurements would determine whether the ~110 Oe exchange bias is intrinsic to the bulk or partly surface-driven.
  • The magnetocaloric exponent n ≈ 0.784 near the martensitic transition is close to values seen in systems with critical fluctuations; combining the Maxwell-relation entropy change with direct specific-heat measurement under field would test whether the reported ΔSM is thermodynamically consistent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental investigation of the Heusler alloy Ni2MnSn0.75Al0.25, combining XRD, XPS, SEM/EDX, DC magnetization, DSC, AC susceptibility, magnetic relaxation, isothermal M(H), magnetocaloric, and exchange-bias measurements. The central claims are that Al substitution produces an L21 matrix with possible B2-type disorder; a second-order paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transition at TC ≈ 734 K; a first-order martensitic transformation near 263 K; coexisting FM and AFM interactions; an interacting reentrant cluster-glass state below about 40 K; an exchange-bias field of ~110 Oe at 5 K; and a magnetocaloric response across the martensitic and Curie transitions. The abstract's load-bearing statement is that the magnetic investigations 'establish the formation of an interacting reentrant cluster glass state accompanied by an exchange-bias effect.'

Significance. If the claims are fully substantiated, the paper would be a useful contribution to Ni-Mn-based Heusler research, showing that a single Al substitution can produce a composition with multiple coupled magnetic phases, strong magnetostructural coupling, a tunable cluster-glass ground state, and magnetocaloric response. The manuscript's strengths are its multi-technique approach and the internal consistency of the main low-temperature observations: ZFC/FC bifurcation, frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peak, non-saturating M(H) loops, and clear loop shift after field cooling. These are appropriate data for diagnosing glassy dynamics and exchange bias. However, several load-bearing quantitative supports are missing: the B2 disorder fraction is not quantified, no numerical ΔSM values are reported, the Raman claim appears only in the conclusion without any data, and the glassy-state fits lack uncertainties and are based on a very narrow frequency window. The significance of the central claims is therefore conditional on completing these missing analyses.

major comments (6)
  1. [3.1 Rietveld Refined XRD / Conclusion] The paper attributes the FM/AFM coexistence, cluster-glass state, and exchange bias to Al-induced B2-type atomic disorder. However, the only structural evidence is the statement that a 'Possible minor contribution from Pm-3m phase may also exist' (Section 3.1). No two-phase Rietveld refinement, B2 phase fraction, or antisite occupancies are provided. Since the entire mechanism rests on this disorder, the authors must quantify the B2 contribution (including site occupancies and an R-factor comparison with and without the B2 model). Without this, the intrinsic, Al-induced origin of the low-temperature magnetic ground state is not established.
  2. [Conclusion] The conclusion states that 'Temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy further reveals pronounced phonon anomalies near ~263 K and the Curie temperature (~734 K), confirming strong spin-phonon coupling.' No Raman data, experimental details, or analysis appear anywhere else in the manuscript. This claim is unsupported as written. Either the Raman measurements and their analysis must be presented, or the claim should be removed. This matters because the spin-phonon coupling is invoked as evidence for magnetostructural coupling in the conclusion.
  3. [Magnetocaloric Effect] The MCE section presents Eqs. (12)-(14) and Figures 11-12, but the text never reports a numerical value for the magnetic entropy change ΔSM at either transition, nor its sign, nor the magnetic field at which the peak occurs. Reporting only the power-law exponent n (0.784 and 1.07) does not quantify the MCE. The claim of an 'appreciable magnetocaloric response' is therefore unsupported. The authors should give peak ΔSM values (with uncertainties) at both transitions and state the sign convention explicitly.
  4. [AC Susceptibility Measurement] The cluster-glass classification relies on fits of the critical slowing-down law, Eq. (3), and the Vogel-Fulcher law, Eq. (6), to the frequency-dependent freezing temperature. However, the data cover only 97-748 Hz (apparently five discrete frequencies), and the fits involve three free parameters each. No uncertainties are reported for τ0, Tg, zν, T0, or Ea/kB, and the method by which Tg was 'obtained by extrapolating the τ-Tf relation to f=0' is not described. With only five points and no error analysis, the confidence in zν ≈ 4.01 and τ0 ≈ 10^-8 s is not established. The authors should provide the number of frequencies, the fitting procedure, error bars, and ideally a broader frequency range or a robustness check.
  5. [Exchange bias] The exchange-bias measurement is not fully specified. The text says the sample was cooled 'under both ZFC and FC conditions (-50 kOe)', but then refers to 'application of a +5T field' and states the FC loop is 'shifted toward the positive field direction.' These statements are ambiguous and potentially contradictory. The authors should state the cooling field magnitude and direction, define the exchange-bias field convention, and provide the raw loop shift (with ZFC and FC loops overlaid) so that the reported ~110 Oe can be verified. They should also clarify whether the shift is opposite to the cooling-field direction as is conventional.
  6. [X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy] The XPS section explicitly notes surface oxidation of Ni and Al. Because the low-temperature cluster-glass and exchange-bias signatures are relatively weak (frequency shift over ~100-750 Hz, exchange bias ~110 Oe), the possible contribution of surface oxide phases or of the unquantified secondary Pm-3m/B2 phase to the observed magnetic response should be addressed. At minimum, the authors should explain why the surface oxidation is negligible for bulk magnetic measurements, or provide a control measurement (e.g., on a freshly polished or annealed surface) to rule out spurious contributions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] There are several typographical and formatting issues: 'Fig.3(c)' should refer to the inverse susceptibility panel (likely Fig. 4(c)); 'FCC' is used for 'FCW' in the text near Fig. 4(a); 'M-µ0H' and 'χ'' symbols are inconsistently formatted. Please proofread carefully.
  2. [D.C. Magnetization Study] The phrase 'paramagnetic-to-weak-ferromagnetic transition' is unusual for a Heusler alloy and is not used consistently elsewhere. Clarify whether this is the usual ferromagnetic transition and avoid the qualifier 'weak' unless the magnetization value justifies it.
  3. [AC magnetic susceptibility (H)] The AT-line extrapolation yields Tf(0) ≈ 42.79 K, while the frequency-dependent analysis gives Tg = 37.6 K and Tf ≈ 39 K. Calling these 'nearly identical' is an overstatement. Please reconcile or explain the difference.
  4. [Magnetocaloric Effect] The statement that n = 1.07 'confirms that the system is in the ferromagnetic phase' is not adequately justified, especially near the Curie transition where critical fluctuations produce non-trivial exponents. Provide a reference or a supporting argument for this interpretation.
  5. [References] The reference list includes some entries that seem tangential (e.g., Refs. [28], [29], [55]) and a few in-text citations are incorrectly placed or incomplete. Please check all citations against the text and ensure the numbered list is complete and accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claim is an experimental interpretation, not a derivation from its own outputs.

full rationale

The paper is a measurement-and-fit study: it reports XRD, XPS, DC/AC magnetization, relaxation, and MCE data and analyzes them with standard diagnostics. No equation in the paper is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to establish; the Curie-Weiss, critical slowing-down, Vogel-Fulcher, Tholence, AT-line, Maxwell, and power-law fits all estimate parameters from the measured data and compare them with external literature ranges. For example, the cluster-glass classification uses the Mydosh parameter p=0.0414 and tau0 ~ 1e-8 s against literature values; the fitted tau0 is not a prediction of an independent quantity. The exchange-bias and FM/AFM coexistence are inferred from loop shift and M-H shape, which are direct observations, not constructed from the conclusion. The one self-citation (ref. [34], Chatterjee et al., on reentrant spin glass in Ni2Mn1.36Sn0.64) is cited alongside refs [33,35-37] and is not load-bearing: the RSG classification rests on the present AC susceptibility analysis and standard comparison values. The paper's weak point is evidential, not circular: the B2/Pm-3m disorder is only mentioned as 'Possible minor contribution ... may also exist' and never quantified by two-phase refinement, and the XPS section admits surface oxidation; but an unquantified structural minority phase is a gap in support for the intrinsic origin of the glassy state, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. No equation of the paper reduces to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 1 reflects the minor self-citation; no actual circularity is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on standard fitting laws (Curie-Weiss, AC susceptibility scaling, Maxwell relation) and on the assumption that the unquantified B2-type disorder is the cause of the magnetic ground state. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (7)
  • Curie-Weiss θCW = 746.4 K
    Fitted to inverse susceptibility for T>757 K; used to claim FM predominance.
  • Curie-Weiss μeff = 6.82 μB
    Same fit; used to claim Mn-moment-dominated magnetism.
  • Mydosh parameter p = 0.0414
    Computed from Tf shift between 97 and 748 Hz; used to classify cluster glass.
  • Critical slowing-down τ0, Tg, zν = 1.678e-8 s, 37.6 K, 4.01
    Fit of AC susceptibility peak maxima to Eq. 4; long τ0 used to infer cluster (not atomic) spin freezing.
  • Vogel-Fulcher τ0, T0, EA/kB = ~1e-8 s, 34.5 K, 2197 K (Arrhenius) / 51.12 K (C)
    Fits to Eqs. 5-7; physical unreasonableness of Arrhenius parameters used to argue interacting clusters.
  • MCE power-law exponent n = 0.784 (263 K), 1.07 (734 K)
    Fitted ΔSM = aH^n; compared to known limits to infer FM vs AFM/PM behavior.
  • Exchange-bias field H_EB = ~110 Oe
    Measured from FC hysteresis loop shift; used as evidence of FM/AFM interface.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Curie-Weiss law
    Used in Eq. 1 to extract θCW and μeff from high-T susceptibility.
  • standard math Maxwell relation for magnetic entropy change
    Used in Eqs. 12-14 to compute ΔSM from M(H,T) isotherms.
  • domain assumption Critical slowing-down power law
    Assumes spin-glass dynamics described by τ = τ0 (Tf/Tg - 1)^(-zν); standard model for SG/CG.
  • domain assumption Vogel-Fulcher law
    Used to model interacting clusters with empirical T0.
  • domain assumption De Almeida-Thouless line
    Assumes H^(2/3) dependence of Tf for SG/CG; used to extrapolate Tf(0)=42.79 K.
  • domain assumption B2 disorder creates short Mn-Mn AFM exchange
    The paper invokes Mn-Mn distance ~0.291 nm in B2 vs 0.411 nm in L21 (from ref [7]) to explain competing interactions, but the B2 fraction is not quantitatively refined in this sample.
  • domain assumption 734 K anomaly is paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transition
    Identified from dM/dT minimum and DSC peak; accepted as Curie temperature though high relative to literature for parent Ni2MnSn.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magneto-Caloric effect and Multiple magnetic phases in Al doped Ni2MnSn0.75Al0.25 Heusler Alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2YGQV3LP

@misc{pith2026260721181,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magneto-Caloric effect and Multiple magnetic phases in Al doped Ni2MnSn0.75Al0.25 Heusler Alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2YGQV3LP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21181}
}
read the original abstract

Among Heusler compounds,Ni based alloys have been extensively investigated because they exhibit desirable properties such as high Curie temperatures, which are advantageous for advanced magnetic and spintronic devices.The effect of Al substitution on the magnetic ground state of Ni2MnSn was investigated using the Ni2MnSn0.75Al0.25 Heusler alloy.Temperature-dependent magnetisation measurements identify a second-order paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition at TC is 734K,followed by a first-order martensitic transformation near 263K,demonstrating strong magnetostructural coupling.Curie Weiss analysis yields a positive Weiss temperature theta CW is 746.4K and an effective magnetic moment of 6.82muB,confirming the predominance of ferromagnetic exchange interactions. The bifurcation between the ZFC and FCW magnetization curves,together with non saturating hysteretic M vs H loops, indicates the coexistence of competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions.Further magnetic investigations establish the formation of an interacting reentrant cluster glass state accompanied by an exchange-bias effect.The observed magnetic behavior is attributed to the modification of Mn Mn exchange interactions induced by Al substitution and the associated atomic disorder,resulting in a complex magnetic ground state.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Magnetocrystalline anisotropy and its electric-field-assisted switching of Heusler-compound-based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions,

    Z. Bai et al., “Magnetocrystalline anisotropy and its electric-field-assisted switching of Heusler-compound-based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions,” New J. Phys., vol. 16, 2014, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103033

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103033 2014

  2. [2]

    Introduction to Half‐Metallic Heusler Alloys: Electronic Structure and Magnetic Properties,

    I. Galanakis, P. Mavropoulos, and P. H. Dederichs, “Introduction to Half‐Metallic Heusler Alloys: Electronic Structure and Magnetic Properties,” ChemInform, vol. 37, no. 12, 2006, doi: 10.1002/chin.200612255

    work page doi:10.1002/chin.200612255 2006

  3. [3]

    Influence of annealing on martensitic transformation and magnetic entropy change in Ni37.7Co12.7Mn40.8Sn8.8 magnetic shape memory alloy ribbon,

    F. Chen, W. L. Liu, Y . G. Shi, and P. Müllner, “Influence of annealing on martensitic transformation and magnetic entropy change in Ni37.7Co12.7Mn40.8Sn8.8 magnetic shape memory alloy ribbon,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 377, pp. 137–141, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.077

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.077 2015

  4. [4]

    Large magnetocaloric and magnetoresistance effects during martensitic transformation in Heusler-type Ni44Co6Mn37In13 alloy,

    T. Zheng, K. Liu, H. Chen, and C. Wang, “Large magnetocaloric and magnetoresistance effects during martensitic transformation in Heusler-type Ni44Co6Mn37In13 alloy,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 563, no. September, p. 170034, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170034

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Metamagnetic transition and magnetocaloric properties of Ni45Mn42In13 Heusler alloy,

    M. Şaşmaz, “Metamagnetic transition and magnetocaloric properties of Ni45Mn42In13 Heusler alloy,” Phase Transitions, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 289–297, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01411594.2021.1931691

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Room-temperature tetragonal non-collinear Heusler antiferromagnet Pt 2 MnGa,

    S. Singh et al., “Room-temperature tetragonal non-collinear Heusler antiferromagnet Pt 2 MnGa,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, no. May, pp. 1–6, 2016, doi: 10.1038/ncomms12671

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms12671 2016

  7. [7]

    Coexisting ferro- and antiferromagnetism in Ni 2MnAl Heusler alloys,

    M. Acet, E. Duman, E. F. Wassermann, L. Mañosa, and A. Planes, “Coexisting ferro- and antiferromagnetism in Ni 2MnAl Heusler alloys,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 3867–3871, 2002, doi: 10.1063/1.1504498

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1504498 2002

  8. [8]

    Structural-induced antiferromagnetism in Mn-based full Heusler alloys: The case of Ni2 MnAl,

    I. Galanakis and E. Şaşoǧlu, “Structural-induced antiferromagnetism in Mn-based full Heusler alloys: The case of Ni2 MnAl,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 2011– 2014, 2011, doi: 10.1063/1.3565246

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3565246 2011

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Slater-Pauling behavior and origin of the half-metallicity of the full-Heusler alloys,

    I. Galanakis, P. H. Dederichs, and N. Papanikolaou, “Slater-Pauling behavior and origin of the half-metallicity of the full-Heusler alloys,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 66, no. 17, pp. 1–9, 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.174429

    2002 doi

  2. [10]

    Magnetocaloric effect and its relation to shape- memory properties in ferromagnetic Heusler alloys,

    A. Planes, L. Mãosa, and M. Acet, “Magnetocaloric effect and its relation to shape- memory properties in ferromagnetic Heusler alloys,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 21, no. 23, 2009, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/23/233201

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    Heusler alloys for metal spintronics,

    A. Hirohata and D. C. Lloyd, “Heusler alloys for metal spintronics,” MRS Bull., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 593–599, 2022, doi: 10.1557/s43577-022-00350-1

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Simple rules for the understanding of Heusler compounds,

    T. Graf, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, “Simple rules for the understanding of Heusler compounds,” Prog. Solid State Chem., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    Phase transformation and magnetocaloric properties of Ni–Co–Mn–In alloy particles fabricated by conventional ball milling,

    D. L. Chen, F. Chen, F. H. Chen, M. Zarinejad, and Y . X. Tong, “Phase transformation and magnetocaloric properties of Ni–Co–Mn–In alloy particles fabricated by conventional ball milling,” Curr. Appl. Phys., vol. 59, no. December 2023, pp. 33–38, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2023.12.014

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    A strategy of optimizing magnetism and hysteresis simultaneously in Ni–Mn-based metamagnetic shape memory alloys,

    H. Le Yan et al., “A strategy of optimizing magnetism and hysteresis simultaneously in Ni–Mn-based metamagnetic shape memory alloys,” Intermetallics, vol. 130, no. June 2020, p. 107063, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2020.107063

    2020

  7. [15]

    Magnetic and structural properties of antiferromagnetic Mn2VSi alloy films grown at elevated temperatures,

    H. Wu, G. Vallejo-Fernandez, and A. Hirohata, “Magnetic and structural properties of antiferromagnetic Mn2VSi alloy films grown at elevated temperatures,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., vol. 50, no. 37, pp. 6–10, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa80d5

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Structure and magnetic properties of Ni-Al and Ni-Mn-Al compound produced by arc melting,

    B. Soegijono, H. A. Notonegoro, and J. Setiawan, “Structure and magnetic properties of Ni-Al and Ni-Mn-Al compound produced by arc melting,” UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. B Chem. Mater. Sci., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 259–266, 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Acceleration of B2/L21 order-disorder transformation in Ni2MnAl Heusler alloys by in-magnetic- field annealing,

    R. Kobayashi, Y . Mitsui, R. Y . Umetsu, K. Takahashi, and K. Koyama, “Acceleration of B2/L21 order-disorder transformation in Ni2MnAl Heusler alloys by in-magnetic- field annealing,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 547, no. October 2021, p. 168908, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168908

    2021

  10. [18]

    Phase Evolution by Annealing of Mechanically Activated Ni, Mn, and Sn Elemental Powders Mixture with the Ni2MnSn Heusler Compound Ratio,

    F. Popa, A. T. A. Man, T. F. Marinca, and I. Chicinaș, “Phase Evolution by Annealing of Mechanically Activated Ni, Mn, and Sn Elemental Powders Mixture with the Ni2MnSn Heusler Compound Ratio,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ma18245642

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Half-metallic Ni2MnSn Heusler alloy prepared by rapid quenching,

    M. Nazmunnahar et al., “Half-metallic Ni2MnSn Heusler alloy prepared by rapid quenching,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 386, pp. 98–101, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.066

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Investigation of multi-mode spin-phonon coupling and local B-site disorder in Pr2CoFeO6 by Raman spectroscopy and correlation with its electronic structure by XPS and XAS studies,

    A. Pal et al., “Investigation of multi-mode spin-phonon coupling and local B-site disorder in Pr2CoFeO6 by Raman spectroscopy and correlation with its electronic structure by XPS and XAS studies,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 31, no. 27, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab144f

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel metal and oxides,

    A. P. Grosvenor, M. C. Biesinger, R. S. C. Smart, and N. S. McIntyre, “New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel metal and oxides,” Surf. Sci., vol. 600, no. 9, pp. 1771–1779, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.041

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    Structural, optical, XPS, and magnetic properties of Sn–O nanoparticles,

    M. V . Kuznetsov and A. V . Safonov, “Structural, optical, XPS, and magnetic properties of Sn–O nanoparticles,” Mater. Chem. Phys., vol. 302, no. April, p. 127739, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127739

    2023

  15. [23]

    XPS study from a clean surface of Al2O3 single crystals,

    T. TAGO, N. KATAOKA, H. TANAKA, K. KINOSHITA, and S. KISHIDA, “XPS study from a clean surface of Al2O3 single crystals,” Procedia Eng., vol. 216, pp. 175–181, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.081

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    Multiple magnetic phases , spin – phonon coupling , and magnetocaloric effect in the non-centrosymmetric,

    M. Lee and E. S. Choi, “Multiple magnetic phases , spin – phonon coupling , and magnetocaloric effect in the non-centrosymmetric,” pp. 0–13, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    The impact of disorder on the 4O-martensite of Ni–Mn–Sn Heusler alloy,

    M. Friák et al., “The impact of disorder on the 4O-martensite of Ni–Mn–Sn Heusler alloy,” Intermetallics, vol. 151, no. September, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2022.107708

    2022

  18. [26]

    Effect of pressure and high magnetic field on phase transitions and magnetic properties of Ni1.92Mn1.56Sn0.52 and Ni2MnSn Heusler compounds,

    J. Kaštil, J. Kamarád, O. Isnard, Y . Skourski, M. Míšek, and Z. Arnold, “Effect of pressure and high magnetic field on phase transitions and magnetic properties of Ni1.92Mn1.56Sn0.52 and Ni2MnSn Heusler compounds,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 650, pp. 248–255, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j...

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    Realization of spin gapless semiconductors: The Heusler compound Mn 2CoAl,

    S. Ouardi, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, and J. Kübler, “Realization of spin gapless semiconductors: The Heusler compound Mn 2CoAl,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 2–6, 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.100401

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    Temperature dependent phonon Raman scattering of Heusler alloy Co 2Mn xFe 1-xAl/GaAs films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy,

    Z. Zhan, Z. Hu, K. Meng, J. Zhao, and J. Chu, “Temperature dependent phonon Raman scattering of Heusler alloy Co 2Mn xFe 1-xAl/GaAs films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy,” RSC Adv., vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 9899–9903, 2012, doi: 10.1039/c2ra21255b

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    Spin-lattice coupling mediated giant magnetodielectricity across the spin reorientation in C a2FeCo O5,

    G. Sharma et al., “Spin-lattice coupling mediated giant magnetodielectricity across the spin reorientation in C a2FeCo O5,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.024436

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    Anomalous vibrational effects in nonmagnetic and magnetic Heusler alloys,

    A. T. Zayak, P. Entel, K. M. Rabe, W. A. Adeagbo, and M. Acet, “Anomalous vibrational effects in nonmagnetic and magnetic Heusler alloys,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.054113

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    Emergence of metamagnetic transition, re-entrant cluster glass and spin phonon coupling in Tb2CoMnO6,

    K. Anand et al., “Emergence of metamagnetic transition, re-entrant cluster glass and spin phonon coupling in Tb2CoMnO6,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 33, no. 27, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/abfe94

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    B-site disorder driven multiple-magnetic phases: Griffiths phase, re- entrant cluster glass, and exchange bias in Pr2CoFeO6,

    A. Pal et al., “B-site disorder driven multiple-magnetic phases: Griffiths phase, re- entrant cluster glass, and exchange bias in Pr2CoFeO6,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 114, no. 25, pp. 0–5, 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5094905

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Low temperature cluster glass behavior in Nd 5Ge 3,

    B. Maji, K. G. Suresh, and A. K. Nigam, “Low temperature cluster glass behavior in Nd 5Ge 3,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 23, no. 50, 2011, doi: 10.1088/0953- 8984/23/50/506002

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    Reentrant-spin-glass state in Ni2Mn1.36Sn0.64 shape-memory alloy ,

    S. Chatterjee, S. Giri, S. K. De, and S. Majumdar, “ Reentrant-spin-glass state in Ni2Mn1.36Sn0.64 shape-memory alloy ,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 1–4, 2009, doi: 10.1103/physrevb.79.092410

    2009 doi

  27. [35]

    Observation of reentrant spin glass behavior in LaCo0.5Ni 0.5 O3,

    M. Viswanathan and P. S. A. Kumar, “Observation of reentrant spin glass behavior in LaCo0.5Ni 0.5 O3,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.012410

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    Reentrant Spin Glass Behavior in Cr-Doped Perovskite Manganite,

    J. Dho, W. S. Kim, and N. H. Hur, “Reentrant Spin Glass Behavior in Cr-Doped Perovskite Manganite,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.027202

    2002 doi

  29. [37]

    Chaos in the Ferromagnetic Phase of a Reentrant Ferromagnet,

    K. Jonason, J. Mattsson, and P. Nordblad, “Chaos in the Ferromagnetic Phase of a Reentrant Ferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 2562–2565, 1996, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2562

    1996 doi

  30. [38]

    Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduction,

    J. a. Mydosh, “Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduction,” Taylor Fr., 1993, [Online]. Available: http://books.google.com/books?id=lRpmQgAACAAJ&pgis=1

    1993

  31. [39]

    Frequency and field dependence of the ac susceptibility of the AuMn spin-glass,

    C. A. M. Mulder, A. J. Van Duyneveldt, and J. A. Mydosh, “Frequency and field dependence of the ac susceptibility of the AuMn spin-glass,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 515–518, 1982, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.515

    1982 doi

  32. [40]

    Susceptibility of the Cu Mn spin-glass: Frequency and field dependences,

    C. A. M. Mulder, A. J. Van Duyneveldt, and J. A. Mydosh, “Susceptibility of the Cu Mn spin-glass: Frequency and field dependences,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1384–1396, 1981, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.1384

    1981 doi

  33. [41]

    Phase coexistence and exchange-bias effect in LiM n2 O4 nanorods,

    X. K. Zhang et al., “Phase coexistence and exchange-bias effect in LiM n2 O4 nanorods,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.104405

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    Cluster spin glass behavior in geometrically frustrated Zn3V3O8,

    T. Chakrabarty, A. V . Mahajan, and S. Kundu, “Cluster spin glass behavior in geometrically frustrated Zn3V3O8,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 26, no. 40, 2014, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/26/40/405601

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Dynamics of spin clusters in amorphous Fe2O3,

    M. D. Mukadam, S. M. Yusuf, P. Sharma, S. K. Kulshreshtha, and G. K. Dey, “Dynamics of spin clusters in amorphous Fe2O3,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 72, no. 17, pp. 1–7, 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.174408

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    Dynamics of an interacting particle system: Evidence of critical slowing down,

    C. Djurberg, P. Svedlindh, and P. Nordblad, “Dynamics of an interacting particle system: Evidence of critical slowing down,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 79, no. 25, pp. 5154– 5157, 1997, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5154

    1997 doi

  37. [45]

    The spin glass behavior in the Heusler alloy Cu2V Al,

    W. Zhang et al., “The spin glass behavior in the Heusler alloy Cu2V Al,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 589, pp. 230–233, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.201

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Cluster-glass behavior in the two- dimensional triangular lattice Ising-spin compound Li2Mn3 O7,

    R. Kumar, P. Yanda, and A. Sundaresan, “Cluster-glass behavior in the two- dimensional triangular lattice Ising-spin compound Li2Mn3 O7,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, no. 21, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.214427

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Spin glass behavior in the disordered half-Heusler compound IrMnGa,

    J. Kroder et al., “Spin glass behavior in the disordered half-Heusler compound IrMnGa,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 99, no. 17, p. 174410, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.174410

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Magnetic properties around quantum critical point of CePt1 - x Rhx,

    I. Kawasaki et al., “Magnetic properties around quantum critical point of CePt1 - x Rhx,” Phys. B Condens. Matter, vol. 404, no. 19, pp. 2908–2911, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2009.07.139

    2009 doi

  41. [49]

    Time-dependent phenomena in a short-range ising spin-glass, Fe0.5Mn0.5TiO3,

    A. Ito, H. Aruga, E. Torikai, M. Kikuchi, Y . Syono, and H. Takei, “Time-dependent phenomena in a short-range ising spin-glass, Fe0.5Mn0.5TiO3,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 483–486, 1986, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.483

    1986 doi

  42. [50]

    Slow relaxation in ferromagnetic nanoparticles: Indication of spin-glass behavior,

    J. Rivas, M. Ulrich, A. Bunde, and J. García-Otero, “Slow relaxation in ferromagnetic nanoparticles: Indication of spin-glass behavior,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.024416

    2003 doi

  43. [51]

    Origin of low temperature memory and aging effects in spin glass like La0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3 nanomanganite,

    S. Karmakar, B. K. Chaudhuri, C. L. Chan, and H. D. Yang, “Origin of low temperature memory and aging effects in spin glass like La0.7 Ca0.3 MnO3 nanomanganite,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 0–8, 2010, doi: 10.1063/1.3505793

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    Reentrant spin-glass state and magnetodielectric effect in the spiral magnet BiMnFe2 O6,

    S. Ghara, B. G. Jeon, K. Yoo, K. H. Kim, and A. Sundaresan, “Reentrant spin-glass state and magnetodielectric effect in the spiral magnet BiMnFe2 O6,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024413

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    Probing the Griffiths like phase, unconventional dual glassy states, giant exchange bias effects and its correlation with its electronic structure in Pr2- xSrxCoMnO6,

    A. Pal et al., “Probing the Griffiths like phase, unconventional dual glassy states, giant exchange bias effects and its correlation with its electronic structure in Pr2- xSrxCoMnO6,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 32, no. 21, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1361- 648X/ab5326

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    The magnetic, electronic and optical properties of HoRhGe,

    S. Gupta, K. G. Suresh, A. K. Nigam, Y . V . Knyazev, Y . I. Kuz’Min, and A. V . Lukoyanov, “The magnetic, electronic and optical properties of HoRhGe,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., vol. 47, no. 36, 2014, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/36/365002

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    Relation between Kitaev magnetism and structure in α-RuCl 3,

    A. Glamazda, P. Lemmens, S. H. Do, Y . S. Kwon, and K. Y . Choi, “Relation between Kitaev magnetism and structure in α-RuCl 3,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 95, no. 17, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.174429

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    Structural, magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties of the multiferroic host double perovskite compound Pr2FeCrO6,

    D. Mazumdar and I. Das, “Structural, magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties of the multiferroic host double perovskite compound Pr2FeCrO6,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 5596–5606, 2021, doi: 10.1039/d0cp06447e

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    Effect of structural, magnetic, magnetocaloric, and electrical polarization properties for multiferroic double perovskite Lu2CoCrO6 compound,

    S. Chatterjee, A. Dutta, and I. Das, “Effect of structural, magnetic, magnetocaloric, and electrical polarization properties for multiferroic double perovskite Lu2CoCrO6 compound,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 136, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0216931

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.