Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Crystallization of pristine cubic ice from liquid at ambient pressure

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pristine cubic ice Ic crystallizes directly from a confined THF–water liquid at ambient pressure, and is the only thermodynamically stable ice phase under those conditions.

desk verdict Liquid-based route to cubic ice that looks genuine, but the 'pristine' and 'thermodynamically stable' claims outrun the data at 3 nm crystallite size. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21872 v1 pith:S2NUY6N5 submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chenwei Zheng , Paul F. Henry , Aasim I. Shaffi , Sanghamitra Mukhopadhyay , Miroslava Novoveska , Milz L. Beaumont , Yidan Wang , Camilla Di Mino
show 6 more authors
Tom F. Headen Marta Falkowska Christopher A. Howard Adam J. Clancy Christoph G. Salzmann Neal T. Skipper
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords cubiciceIcpolymorphismnanoconfinedwatermesoporoussilicatetrahydrofuranclathrateformerstackingdisorderneutrondiffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a route to pristine cubic ice Ic, the diamond-structured water polymorph that has been sought in pure form since 1943. Cooling a 1:17 tetrahydrofuran–water solution inside the 3.7 nm cylindrical pores of mesoporous silica at atmospheric pressure produces a single crystalline ice phase whose neutron diffraction pattern indexes entirely to cubic ice Ic, with no resolvable hexagonal stacking. Control experiments in the same pores with neat water or with acetonitrile instead of THF yield hexagonal or stacking-disordered ice, which identifies the clathrate-forming molecule as the causal ingredient rather than confinement alone. The authors conclude that under these confined conditions cubic ice Ic is the only thermodynamically stable crystalline phase of water and is directly accessible from the liquid state. A sympathetic reader would care because this answers a long-open question and implies cubic ice may form in natural nanoporous environments such as mineral-dust aerosols, cirrus and polar-mesospheric clouds, and cometary grains.

What carries the argument

The central object is the combination of nanoconfinement and a clathrate-hydrate-forming organic solute. MCM-41 provides ordered cylindrical pores about 3.7 nm in diameter with silanol-rich walls that mimic hydrophilic mineral surfaces; tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 1:17 molar ratio with water is a structure-II clathrate former whose empty-cage water framework shares the same space group as cubic ice Ic. The proposed mechanism is that THF molecules, concentrated near the pore wall, steer the crystallizing water into the cubic diamond stacking sequence and suppress the hexagonal layer faults that normally produce ice Ih or stacking-disordered ice. The control experiments—neat water and a non-clath

What would settle it

Fit the same 150 K diffraction data with a stacking-fault model that returns a cubic/hexagonal stacking probability, or image the crystallites with cryogenic electron microscopy; if the best-fit stacking probability deviates from perfectly cubic, or a higher-resolution diffractometer resolves the hexagonal (100) reflection, the pristine-cubic claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At pore fillings up to 0.60 cm³ of liquid per gram of silica, every ice Bragg peak in the 150 K neutron diffraction pattern is index-matched solely to cubic ice Ic (space group Fd-3m, the diamond-cubic arrangement of water molecules). Rietveld refinement gives a good fit to a single cubic phase, and attempts to fit pure hexagonal ice or a cubic–hexagonal mixture leave no detectable hexagonal component within the instrument resolution. The cubic crystallites are roughly 3 nm in equatorial diameter and longer along the pore axis, and they coexist with a non-crystalline, THF-rich glassy layer at the silica wall. Differential scanning calorimetry shows only confined freezing at 225 K and melting

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the ice is pristine rests on the absence of resolvable hexagonal reflections in diffraction patterns of crystallites only about 3 nm across; at that size, stacking-disordered ice can also show a single broadened (111)-type peak, and the paper does not fit an explicit stacking-fault model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A practical, ambient-pressure route to pristine cubic ice Ic now exists: a simple THF–water solution in mesoporous silica, with no high-pressure precursor, cryogenic vacuum, or gas-hydrate intermediate.
  • Cubic ice Ic can be the first crystalline ice to form from liquid water in hydrophilic nanopores, so mineral-dust and organic aerosols at cirrus and polar-mesospheric-cloud temperatures become plausible natural sites for this phase.
  • The coexistence of cubic ice with a glassy THF–water interfacial layer provides a microphysical picture for mixed cubic/amorphous ice mantles on cometary and interstellar dust grains, and for the presence of THF on comet 67P.
  • Nanoconfinement suppresses clathrate-hydrate formation relative to bulk solution, a constraint relevant to clathrate management in pipelines and to models of cometary outgassing that couple amorphous ice, crystalline ice, and clathrate transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The generality of the strategy is an inference, not established: the paper tests one clathrate former (THF) and one pore architecture (MCM-41), so whether other cage-forming solutes or other hydrophilic hosts also yield pristine cubic ice remains to be shown.
  • The thermodynamic-stability claim is demonstrated for the specific 3.7 nm pore environment; extending it to bulk water, larger pores, or different surface chemistries would require new measurements, since confinement is part of the stabilising mechanism.
  • A testable extension would be to vary pore diameter, THF concentration, and cooling rate to map the cubic-ice stability window and find the limit at which hexagonal stacking intrudes; the paper's loading series already hints the axial crystallite size grows with loading before Ih appears at 0.70 cm³/g.
  • If the phase is genuinely thermodynamically stable rather than kinetically trapped, one would expect it to persist on long timescales and on annealing below 230 K; direct long-duration annealing experiments are an inference, not reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports that cooling a 1:17 THF–D2O solution confined in MCM-41 mesoporous silica at ambient pressure produces a solid whose neutron diffraction pattern matches cubic ice Ic (Fd-3m), with no resolvable hexagonal or stacking-disordered component. The claim is supported by Rietveld refinement, control experiments with neat D2O and acetonitrile–D2O, Raman spectroscopy, DSC, and QENS. The authors argue that this is the first liquid-based route to pristine cubic ice Ic and that this phase is the only thermodynamically stable crystalline phase under these conditions.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is a significant result: it would establish a simple, ambient-pressure route from the liquid state to pristine cubic ice Ic, which has long been sought. The control experiments are well designed: they show that the effect is specific to the clathrate-forming THF and not merely due to confinement. The paper also provides reproducibility data on a second instrument (OSIRIS) and uses contrast variation to separate water and THF contributions. These are clear strengths. However, the strongest claim—'pristine' zero-stacking-disorder cubic ice and its thermodynamic stability—rests on the absence of resolved hexagonal reflections at a crystallite size of only ~3 nm, where faulted ice Isd can produce a virtually identical, single broadened (111) envelope. Because no explicit stacking-fault model was fitted, the headline claim is not yet established at the reported resolution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2, Table 1, Extended Data Fig. 5] The conclusion that the confined solid is pristine cubic ice Ic with 'no detectable stacking disorder' is based on Rietveld refinements against pure Ic and an Ic/Ih mixture. This does not include a faulted ice I model (e.g., a stacking probability α in the ice I framework). With equatorial crystallite sizes of ~3 nm, the size broadening is comparable to the separation between the Ic (111) peak at 1.70 Å⁻¹ and the Ih (100)/(101) features at 1.61/1.82 Å⁻¹. A stacking-disordered ice Isd with moderate fault probability can produce a single broadened (111) envelope that is indistinguishable from the reported data. The phrase 'pristine' and the abstract's unambiguous claim therefore require an explicit stacking-disorder fit or a demonstrated sensitivity limit for α. This is the load-bearing point of the paper.
  2. [Extended Data Fig. 2] The OSIRIS contrast-variation difference pattern is fitted with a single Lorentzian in the region of the (111) peak. This is presented as evidence against Ih/Isd triplet features, but a single Lorentzian is not a stacking-disorder model. The fit does not quantify the maximum admissible stacking-fault probability that would still be consistent with the data. Please report the resolution limits of this measurement and the expected peak positions/shapes for Isd at 5 K, or fit a faulted-ice model to the full pattern.
  3. [Abstract and Main text, 'Summary' paragraph] The claim that cubic ice Ic is 'the only thermodynamically stable crystalline phase of water' under these conditions is stronger than the data support. The experiments show that, within the measured time/temperature window, only Ic is observed and that Ih appears only at higher loadings outside the pores. This is evidence of kinetic selectivity or metastable persistence, not of thermodynamic stability relative to Ih inside the pores. No free-energy measurement or long-term annealing study is presented. The wording should be qualified to 'the only crystalline phase observed' or 'stable within the confinement conditions studied' unless thermodynamic stability is demonstrated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Main text] The Summary line 'pristine cubic ice 1 c' contains a stray '1'. The abstract also uses 'unambiguously' where, given the resolution-limited stacking-disorder analysis, 'under the present experimental conditions' is more accurate.
  2. [Methods / Table 1] The Rietveld refinement uses only Polaris bank 3. The manuscript should state explicitly the d/Q resolution of the bank used and whether higher-resolution banks were examined. Also, the meaning of 'Equatorial size' and 'Axial size' should be defined (e.g., Scherrer-type or profile-shape parameters).
  3. [Extended Data Fig. 5c] The background comparison to an unfrozen sample at 260 K is described as 'consistent' with a vitrified interfacial THF–water phase. This is a qualitative comparison; please provide a quantitative goodness-of-fit or a model including the amorphous component to support the assignment.
  4. [General] The term 'stacking-disordered ice (Isd)' is used inconsistently: sometimes 'Ih/Isd' is treated as a single category, but the control experiments are described as showing 'hexagonal/stacking disorder' without a quantitative distinction. Clarify what distinguishes Ih from Isd in the controls.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the 'pristine cubic ice' claim is a resolution-limited experimental interpretation, not a derivation from its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental identification rather than a first-principles derivation. Cubic ice Ic is assigned from direct neutron diffraction Bragg positions (Q = 1.70, 2.78, 3.42, 4.28 Å⁻¹), Rietveld refinement against an Fd-3m model (Fig. 2, Table 1), and contrast-variation OSIRIS data (Extended Data Fig. 2). The Ic fingerprint is referenced to del Rosso et al. (ref. 25) and independently to Komatsu et al. (ref. 26) and Huang et al. (ref. 27); no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation. The 'no detectable stacking disorder' conclusion is model- and resolution-limited: the crystallites are only ~3 nm in equatorial size, and the paper explicitly qualifies the statement as 'within the instrument resolution.' This is a scientific limitation, not circularity, because the conclusion is not obtained by substituting fitted parameters into the claim or by invoking a self-authored uniqueness theorem. The attempted refinement against Ih and mixed Ic/Ih models (Extended Data Fig. 5) is a check, not a definition of Ic. Control experiments with neat D2O and acetonitrile/D2O empirically support the THF-specific effect. Some cited works involve coauthors, but they are used as corroborative fingerprints alongside independent external references and direct crystallographic modeling. Overreach in wording such as 'unambiguously' and 'only thermodynamically stable' is an evidentiary-strength concern, not a circular-derivation concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim is experimentally grounded; the fitted parameters are characterization outputs rather than inputs that force the conclusion. However, the 'pristine' and 'only thermodynamically stable' assertions depend on fitted phase fractions and a background model, and are not independently thermodynamically measured.

free parameters (3)
  • Ice Ih weight fraction in two-phase Rietveld fit = 0.009
    Used to conclude 'no detectable stacking disorder'; a fitted parameter with no reported uncertainty.
  • Crystallite size broadening parameters = equatorial ~3.5 nm; axial 6.7-12 nm
    Fitted size-broadening model; if incorrect, it could absorb stacking-fault broadening and affect the 'pristine' claim.
  • QENS dynamical parameters (τtrans, L, Dtrans, τrot) = various, Extended Data Fig. 9
    Descriptive of liquid dynamics; not load-bearing for the central ice-phase claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rietveld refinement with the assumed Fd-3m cubic model correctly separates Bragg and diffuse scattering.
    The background subtraction and diffuse scattering from a vitrified THF-water component are modeled as background; if the background treatment removed part of a stacking-disordered ice signal, the purity conclusion would fail. See Methods and Extended Data Fig. 5.
  • domain assumption Deuterated water (D2O) is a faithful proxy for H2O in the nucleation/crystallization behavior of the confined system.
    Most diffraction used D2O; isotope effects on ice polymorphism are assumed negligible (ref 41).
  • domain assumption Acetonitrile is an appropriate negative control because it is non-clathrate-forming, isolating the role of clathrate-forming ability.
    The causal role of THF is inferred from the acetonitrile control; if acetonitrile also affected water activity/nucleation in other ways, the mechanism claim would weaken.
  • domain assumption MCM-41 confinement plus THF is representative of atmospheric mineral-dust nanopores and cometary grains.
    The broader implications for natural clouds and comets rely on this analogy.
invented entities (1)
  • Interfacial vitrified THF-water component independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the diffuse scattering background and the Raman/QENS signatures of non-crystalline material adjacent to the ice Ic core.
    Supported by Raman band behavior, QENS EFWS inflection, and background matching (Extended Data Figs 5-8); it is inferred from data, not a purely ad hoc entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Crystallization of pristine cubic ice from liquid at ambient pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S2NUY6N5

@misc{pith2026260721872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Crystallization of pristine cubic ice from liquid at ambient pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S2NUY6N5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21872}
}
read the original abstract

The phase diagram of frozen water is famously rich: to date, over twenty crystalline polymorphs have been identified. Of the low-pressure 'ice I' family, hexagonal (Ih) is the principal form on Earth, while cubic (Ic) is much more elusive. Fundamental questions remain open as to whether cubic ice Ic can form directly from the liquid state, its thermodynamic stability and natural occurrence. Here we show that pristine cubic ice Ic can be formed at atmospheric pressure simply by cooling an aqueous solution confined within mesoporous silica. Using primarily neutron scattering, we show unambiguously that under these conditions, cubic ice Ic forms reproducibly and is the only thermodynamically stable crystalline phase of water. The discovery that cubic ice Ic is directly accessible from the liquid state, and stable at atmospheric pressure, strongly suggests that this polymorph plays a much more significant role in natural and synthetic processes than previously thought.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Hansen, T. C. The everlasting hunt for new ice phases. Nat. Commun. 12, 3161 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Lee, Y .-H. et al. Multiple freezing–melting pathways of high-density ice through ice XXI phase at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 25, 302–309 (2026)

    2026

  3. [3]

    Eine kubische Eismodifikation

    König, H. Eine kubische Eismodifikation. Z. Kristallogr. 105, 279–286 (1943)

    1943

  4. [4]

    & Debenedetti, P

    Haji-Akbari, A. & Debenedetti, P. G. Direct calculation of ice homogeneous nucleation rate for a molecular model of water. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10582–10588 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    F., Sippel, C., Falenty, A

    Kuhs, W. F., Sippel, C., Falenty, A. & Hansen, T. C. Extent and relevance of stacking disorder in ‘ice Ic’. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21259–21264 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Malkin, T. L. et al. Stacking disorder in ice I. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 60–76 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    & Molinero, V

    Hudait, A. & Molinero, V . What determines the ice polymorph in clouds? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8958–8967 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Salzmann, C. G. et al. Is there H₂O stacking disordered ice I in the Solar System? Icarus 410, 115897 (2024)

    2024

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Cubic ice in nature

    Whalley, E. Cubic ice in nature. J. Phys. Chem. 87, 4174–4179 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    J., Knopf, D

    Murray, B. J., Knopf, D. A. & Bertram, A. K. The formation of cubic ice under conditions relevant to Earth's atmosphere. Nature 434, 202–205 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Gao, R. S. et al. Evidence that nitric acid increases relative humidity in low- temperature cirrus clouds. Science 303, 516–520 (2004)

    2004

  4. [12]

    Murray, B. J. et al. Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions. Nat. Geosci. 3, 233–237 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Extraterrestrial Ice

    Klinger, J. Extraterrestrial Ice. A review. J. Phys. Chem. 87, 4209–4214 (1983)

    1983

  6. [14]

    & Bar-Nun, A

    Notesco, G., Kleinfeld, I., Laufer, D. & Bar-Nun, A. Gas release from comets. Icarus 89, 411–413 (1991)

    1991

  7. [15]

    & Jewitt, D

    Prialnik, D. & Jewitt, D. Amorphous ice in comets: evidence and consequences. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05907 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    & Hallbrucker, A

    Mayer, E. & Hallbrucker, A. Cubic ice from liquid water. Nature 325, 601–602 (1987)

    1987

  9. [17]

    & Uematsu, H

    Morishige, K., Yasunaga, H. & Uematsu, H. Stability of cubic ice in mesopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 3056–3061 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    P., Finch, E

    Arnold, G. P., Finch, E. D., Rabideau, S. W. & Wenzel, R. G. Neutron-diffraction study of ice polymorphs. III. Ice Ic. J. Chem. Phys. 49, 4365–4369 (1968). 18

    1968

  11. [19]

    F., Bliss, D

    Kuhs, W. F., Bliss, D. V . & Finney, J. L. High-resolution neutron powder diffraction study of ice Ic. J. Phys. Colloq. 48, C1-631–C1-636 (1987)

    1987

  12. [20]

    Dowell, L. G. & Rinfret, A. P. Low-Temperature Forms of Ice as Studied by X-Ray Diffraction. Nature 188, 1144–1148 (1960)

    1960

  13. [21]

    McMillan, J. A. & Los, S. C. Vitreous Ice: Irreversible Transformations During Warm-Up. Nature 206, 806–807 (1965)

    1965

  14. [22]

    F., Genov, G., Staykova, D

    Kuhs, W. F., Genov, G., Staykova, D. K. & Hansen, T. Ice perfection and onset of anomalous preservation of gas hydrates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 4917–4920 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    G., Vishwakarma, G

    Ghosh, J., Bhuin, R. G., Vishwakarma, G. & Pradeep, T. Formation of Cubic Ice via Clathrate Hydrate, Prepared in Ultrahigh Vacuum under Cryogenic Conditions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 26–32 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    & Kuhs, W

    Falenty, A. & Kuhs, W. F. ‘Self-Preservation’ of CO2 Gas Hydrates: Surface Microstructure and Ice Perfection. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 15975–15988 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    del Rosso, L. et al. Cubic ice Ic without stacking defects obtained from ice XVII. Nat. Mater. 19, 663–668 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Komatsu, K. et al. Ice Ic without stacking disorder by evacuating hydrogen from hydrogen hydrate. Nat. Commun. 11, 464 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Huang, X. et al. Tracking cubic ice at molecular resolution. Nature 617, 86–91 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Adebiyi, A. et al. A review of coarse mineral dust in the Earth system. Aeolian Res. 60, 100849 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    B., Fitzner, M

    Davies, M. B., Fitzner, M. & Michaelides, A. Routes to cubic ice through heterogeneous nucleation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2025245118 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    C., Dore, J

    Steytler, D. C., Dore, J. C. & Wright, C. J. Neutron diffraction study of cubic ice nucleation in a porous silica network. J. Phys. Chem. 87, 2458–2459 (1983)

    1983

  23. [31]

    K., Maheshwari, P., Kolay, S., Yusuf, S

    Dutta, D., Bera, A. K., Maheshwari, P., Kolay, S., Yusuf, S. M. & Pujari, P. K. High cubicity of D₂O ice inside spherical nanopores of MIL-101(Cr) framework: a neutron diffraction study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 11872–11881 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Giesselmann, N. C. et al. The structure of ice under confinement in periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs). J. Chem. Phys. 161, 034508 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    C., Webber, J

    Seyed-Yazdi, J., Farman, H., Dore, J. C., Webber, J. B. W. & Findenegg, G. H. Structural characterization of water/ice formation in SBA-15 silicas: III. The triplet profile for 86 Å pore diameter. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 205108 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Thangswamy, M. et al. Evolution of confined ice nanostructures at different levels of pore filling: a synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 14309–14317 (2020). 19

    2020

  27. [35]

    Conrad, H. et al. Tetrahydrofuran clathrate hydrate formation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 218301 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    M., Yamashita, K., del Rosso, L., Celli, M

    Tonauer, C. M., Yamashita, K., del Rosso, L., Celli, M. & Loerting, T. Enthalpy change from pure cubic ice Ic to hexagonal ice Ih. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 5055–5060 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    H., Jähnert, S., Akcakayiran, D

    Findenegg, G. H., Jähnert, S., Akcakayiran, D. & Schreiber, A. Freezing and melting of water confined in silica nanopores. ChemPhysChem 9, 2651–2659 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Giacovazzo, C. et al. Fundamentals of Crystallography, 3rd Edition, (IUCr/Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Toby, B. H. & von Dreele, R. B. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all- purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 544–549 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    M., Höltzel, A., Seidel-Morgenstern, A

    Melnikov, S. M., Höltzel, A., Seidel-Morgenstern, A. & Tallarek, U. A molecular dynamics study on the partitioning mechanism in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6251–6254 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Finney, J. L. & Soper, A. K. Solvent structure and perturbations in solutions of chemical and biological importance. Chem. Soc. Rev. 23, 1–10 (1994)

    1994

  34. [42]

    The Raman OH stretching bands of liquid water

    Sun, Q. The Raman OH stretching bands of liquid water. Vib. Spectrosc. 51, 213–217 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    & Jhe, W

    Shin, D., Hwang, J. & Jhe, W. Ice-VII-like molecular structure of ambient water nanomeniscus. Nat. Commun. 10, 286 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    H., Cade, N., Michette, A

    Erko, M., Findenegg, G. H., Cade, N., Michette, A. G. & Paris, O. Confinement- induced structural changes of water studied by Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. B 84, 104205 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    Carr, T. H. G., Shephard, J. J. & Salzmann, C. G. Spectroscopic signature of stacking disorder in ice I. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2469–2473 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Jimenez, J. L. et al. Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere. Science 326, 1525–1529 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Hervig, M. E. & Gordley, L. L. Temperature, shape, and phase of mesospheric ice from Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, D15208 (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    Hänni, N. et al. Oxygen-bearing organic molecules in comet 67P’s dusty coma: First evidence for abundant heterocycles. Astron. Astrophys. 678, A22 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Sloan, E. D. & Koh, C. A. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, 3rd Edition, (CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, 2008). 20

    2008

  42. [50]

    & Fray, N

    Marboeuf, U., Schmitt, B., Petit, J.-M., Mousis, O. & Fray, N. A cometary nucleus model taking into account all phase changes of water ice: amorphous, crystalline, and clathrate. Astron. Astrophys. 542, A82 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Smith, R. I. et al. The upgraded Polaris powder diffractometer at the ISIS neutron source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 115101 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    & Markvardsen, A

    Mukhopadhyay, S., Hewer, B., Howells, S. & Markvardsen, A. A modern approach to QENS data analysis in Mantid. Physica B Condens. Matter 563, 41–49 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Teixeira, J., Bellissent-Funel, M.-C., Chen, S. H. & Dianoux, A. J. Experimental determination of the nature of diffusive motions of water molecules at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1913–1917 (1985)

    1913

  46. [54]

    Sears, V . F. Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections. Neutron News 3, 26–37 (1992)

    1992

  47. [55]

    & Sloan, E

    Subramanian, S. & Sloan, E. D. Trends in vibrational frequencies of guests trapped in clathrate hydrate cages. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 4348–4355 (2002)

    2002

  48. [56]

    & Halle, B

    Qvist, J., Schober, H. & Halle, B. Structural dynamics of supercooled water from quasielastic neutron scattering and molecular simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 144508 (2011). 21 Table 1. Structural parameters of ice Ic and Ih as obtained by the Rietveld refinement to neutron d...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.