Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Composition Anisotropy Drives Large Bulk Photovoltaic Fields Along the Non-polar Vertical Direction in 2D Hybrid Perovskite Ferroelectrics

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric shows a bulk photovoltaic field of 238 V/cm along its nonpolar vertical direction—two orders of magnitude above the polar in-plane direction—because absorbing inorganic layers sit atop an insulating orga

desk verdict A large vertical photovoltage in a 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric that is worth serious attention, but the BPE attribution and the series-resistance model need to be tightened before the bold claims hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22261 v1 pith:HQBXRTTA submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yuzhong Hu , Andrii Shcherbakov , Jonathan Zerhoch , Lars Schneider , Shangpu Liu , Xitao Liu , Fangping Zhuo , Lovro Fulanovic
show 2 more authors
Felix Deschler Martijn Kemerink
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords bulkphotovoltaiceffect2DhybridperovskiteferroelectricsshiftcurrentferroelectricphotovoltaicsphotovoltageanisotropyEA4Pb3Br10nonpolarphotoconductivityphotodetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that in the layered 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric EA4Pb3Br10 (EPB), the bulk photovoltaic field along the nonpolar vertical direction is 238 V/cm—about two orders of magnitude larger than the 8.8 V/cm measured along the polar in-plane direction. This goes against the usual expectation that the polar axis hosts the strongest bulk photovoltaic response. The authors explain the effect through composition anisotropy: the inorganic lead-bromide layers efficiently generate photocarriers via the shift-current mechanism, while the organic layers are insulator-like, so photoconductivity exists only in a thin illuminated surface region connected in series with a dark, poorly conducting bulk. They derive formulas showing that this series configuration makes the vertical photovoltage scale linearly with laser intensity and nonlinearly with crystal thickness, and they argue the same framework applies to other 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectrics.

What carries the argument

The central object is EA4Pb3Br10 (EPB), a layered Ruddlesden–Popper-type hybrid perovskite ferroelectric whose polarization lies in-plane while the vertical direction is nonpolar. The carrying mechanism is the shift-current bulk photovoltaic effect: oblique illumination drives a BPE photocurrent along the nonpolar vertical direction through the tensor element β_aac, which follows sin2θ and zero-offset behaviour. The governing identity is E_BPE = J_BPE/σ, with σ determined by the series combination of a thin photoconductive surface layer (absorption coefficient 1.06×10^5 cm^-1, penetration depth ~94 nm) and a dark, insulating organic-dominated bulk (σ_dark ≈ 10^-10 S/m). The paper's formulas

What would settle it

Replace the transparent top electrode with a different metal and illuminate from both top and bottom: a true shift-current BPE signal should persist and reverse with incidence angle (sin2θ), while an electrode or carrier-diffusion artifact would change magnitude or sign with contact metal and illumination side. Alternatively, measure the vertical photoconductivity profile directly on a cleaved cross-section and compute V = J_BPE ∫ dx/σ(x); if this does not reproduce the 5.4 V open-circuit voltage, the thickness-averaged series-resistance formula is the weak link.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' terms, the central discovery is that a 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric with in-plane polarization can produce its largest bulk photovoltaic field along the nonpolar out-of-plane direction, with E_BPE = 238 V/cm versus 8.8 V/cm along the polar direction. The field arises from a shift-current BPE photocurrent along the vertical direction—allowed by the tensor element β_aac under oblique illumination—combined with an extremely low out-of-plane dark conductivity. Because the optical penetration depth is only about 94 nm, the illuminated layer is a good photoconductor while the rest of the crystal acts as a dark resistor in series; the resulting voltage is then J_BPE/σ_dark, wh

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 5.4 V vertical signal is a genuine bulk photovoltaic response obeying V = J_BPE/σ with σ taken as the thickness-averaged conductivity; if the signal is an electrode, carrier-diffusion, or thermal artifact, or if the series resistance of the non-uniformly illuminated crystal should instead be computed from ∫dx/σ(x), the 238 V/cm value does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The vertical bulk photovoltaic field of 238 V/cm is two orders of magnitude larger than the polar-direction field in the same crystal and the largest reported among 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectrics.
  • Along the nonpolar vertical direction, the photovoltage rises almost linearly with laser intensity, unlike the intensity-independent photovoltage of conventional photoferroelectrics, because dark conductivity dominates the series resistance.
  • The photovoltage scales nonlinearly with crystal thickness instead of linearly, matching the paper's Eq. 12, and this thickness dependence can be used to tune device output.
  • The model predicts that any polar system with a strongly absorbing thin layer on an insulating bulk can exhibit a similar nonpolar EBPE enhancement, so the design principle extends beyond this specific compound.
  • The high in-plane BPE coefficient (βL ≈ 39 µA/mW) shows the inorganic framework is an efficient shift-current generator, making these 2D hybrids promising for voltage-readout photodetectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model implies a testable design rule: reducing the dark conductivity along the vertical direction (for example by lengthening the organic spacer) or increasing the absorption coefficient should raise E_BPE further; the paper does not itself propose this optimization.
  • Because the crystal is never poled along the vertical axis, the large vertical field is not switchable by an external vertical field; if vertical readout is desired, the in-plane polarization would have to be the memory state and the vertical photovoltage the readout channel, a coupling the paper notes but does not explore.
  • The near-linear VBPE–I0 dependence suggests that at sufficiently high intensity, photoconductivity should overtake dark conductivity and the curve should bend toward saturation; measuring the crossover intensity would provide a quantitative check of Eq. 13.
  • A similar series-resistance argument could apply to ferroelectric heterostructures or domain-engineered films with a thin absorbing layer on an insulating substrate, potentially transferring the effect beyond hybrid perovskites.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports bulk photovoltaic effect (BPE) measurements on EA4Pb3Br10 (EPB), a 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric with in-plane spontaneous polarization. It claims that the out-of-plane nonpolar direction exhibits a bulk photovoltaic field EBPE = 238 V/cm, stated to be two orders of magnitude higher than the in-plane polar direction (8.8 V/cm) and higher than benchmark photoferroelectrics. The authors attribute this emergent anisotropy to the combination of high in-plane photoelectric efficiency, low out-of-plane dark conductivity, and strong optical absorption, and they propose formulas describing an intensity-dependent and thickness-dependent photovoltage. The paper includes polarization-angle and incidence-angle dependence, switchable photocurrent for the in-plane polarization, and photoconductivity anisotropy measurements.

Significance. If the vertical 5.4 V response is truly BPE, this is a significant result: it would demonstrate that a nonpolar direction can host a larger bulk photovoltaic field than the polar direction in a 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric, with potential for voltage-readout photodetection. The strength of the paper is the combination of in-plane switching, polarization-angle and incidence-angle dependence, and the very high βL ~39 µA/mW extracted for the in-plane direction. However, the quantitative claim is overstated, the model uses an incorrect series-resistance treatment, and the vertical response lacks the key ferroelectric switching test. These issues are load-bearing and require additional experiments and model revision before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §3 (vertical BPE characterization)] The central claim that the out-of-plane EBPE (238 V/cm) is 'two orders of magnitude higher' than the in-plane value (8.8 V/cm) is contradicted by the quoted numbers: 238/8.8 ≈ 27, i.e., a factor of about 27, not 100. The same factor applies to the photovoltages (5.4 V vs 0.2 V). Please correct the abstract and main text to 'more than an order of magnitude', or provide measured data that actually show a factor ≥100 in some comparison.
  2. [Eqs. (8)–(12)] The model uses V_BPE = J_BPE / σ with a thickness-averaged photoconductivity σ_phe-eff = (1/d)∫σ dx. For a nonuniformly illuminated slab, the correct open-circuit voltage is V = ∫₀ᵈ J_shift(x)/σ(x) dx (equivalently, the series resistance is ∫ dx/σ(x), not d/[(1/d)∫σ dx]). Because the light penetration depth is ~94 nm and J_shift is confined near the illuminated surface, the local field is not homogeneous. The extraction of a uniform 'EBPE = 238 V/cm' from V/d, and the V(d) and V(I0) scaling laws derived from Eqs. (11)–(12), are therefore not physically established. Please revise the model using the local balance J(x) = J_shift(x) + σ(x)E(x) and integrate E(x) over the thickness.
  3. [Fig. 3 and §3 (vertical BPE origin)] The vertical photovoltage is not demonstrated to be of BPE origin. The φ- and θ-dependence is consistent with Eq. (2), but no ferroelectric switching or poling experiment is reported for the vertical geometry. The statement that the above-bandgap photovoltage 'further confirms its BPE origin' is insufficient, because photovoltages of this magnitude can also arise from photo-Dember, thermoelectric, or electrode-related effects. A polarization-reversal test that flips the in-plane polarization and shows a corresponding reversal of the out-of-plane photocurrent/photovoltage is needed to exclude these artifacts.
  4. [Eq. (13) and Fig. 3e] Equation (13), V_BPE = (β_L / σ_dark) I0, is presented as explaining the emergent linear V(I0) behavior, but β_L and σ_dark are measured on the same material; this is a consistency check rather than a parameter-free prediction. Moreover, the β_L used is extracted from the in-plane measurement, while the out-of-plane BPE coefficient (β_aac in Eq. (2)) is not reported. The V(d) fit in Fig. 3e uses four fitted constants (a3, b3, c1, d) and therefore does not independently test the model. Please provide the measured out-of-plane β_aac and, if possible, a parameter-free comparison with Eq. (13) and the V(d) data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Entire manuscript] The notation for the BPE current is inconsistent: both J_BPE and JBPE appear. Please unify.
  2. [§3 and Fig. 3e] The comparison of EBPE with benchmark materials in Fig. 3f should specify the sample thickness used for each entry, because the nonlinear V(d) relation makes EBPE thickness-dependent in this material.
  3. [Eq. (12)] The equation contains an awkward typesetting with '×1/d d'; please clarify the intended fractional form.
  4. [Throughout] Please check for typos such as 'electric conductivity' (should be 'electrical conductivity') and ensure the acronym for EA4Pb3Br10 is consistently 'EPB'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: measured beta_L, sigma_dark, and symmetry data carry the derivation; model fits are not presented as forced predictions.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which a claimed prediction is identical by construction to an input. The vertical BPE tensor analysis (Eq. 2) is a symmetry ansatz tested against independent phi- and theta-dependent photocurrent data, not an output of the model. The intensity dependence is obtained from Eq. 13, V ≈ (beta_L/sigma_dark) I0, where beta_L and sigma_dark are directly measured quantities (Fig. 2d and the dark-slope in Fig. 3c) and the observed linear V(I0) relation is a separate data set; this is a consistency check, not a re-used fit. The thickness scaling in Fig. 3e is explicitly presented as a fit to Eq. 12 with free constants ("a fit of VBPE magnitude = c1 + d/(a3 + b3 x 1/d), c.f. Eq. 12"), so it is a model fit and not an independent prediction; this weakens its confirmatory power but is not a circular reduction. The out-of-plane voltage is never poled, so its BPE origin is less secured than the in-plane case, but the absence of a control experiment is an experimental gap, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. 1 and 43) appear only for context and for the Hecht fitting functions; they are not load-bearing. The use of thickness-averaged conductivity in Eqs. 8-12 is physically questionable for a series circuit, but a modeling error is not a self-referential derivation. Overall: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central result rests on measured material parameters (β_L, α, σ_dark, µτ) and on a series of modeling assumptions connecting them; no new entities are introduced. The most fragile input is the averaged-conductivity relation used to build Eqs 8–12.

free parameters (7)
  • In-plane BPE coefficient β_L = 39 µA/mW at 405 nm, I0=6.4 mW/cm²
    Measured as JBPE/I0 (Fig.2) and used as the shift-current source in Eqs 3–13; acts as empirical input, not derived.
  • Absorption coefficient α = 1.06×10^5 cm^-1 (penetration depth 94 nm)
    Extracted from spin-coated thin film transmission; controls the exponential photoconductivity profile in Eqs 5–10.
  • Mobility-lifetime product µτ (in-plane) = 1.38×10^-4 cm²/V
    From Hecht-equation fit to in-plane J-V curve (Eq14, Fig.4c).
  • Mobility-lifetime product µτ (out-of-plane) = 2.53×10^-8 cm²/V
    From Hecht-equation fit to vertical J-V curve (Eq15, Fig.4c).
  • Dark conductivity σ_dark (out-of-plane) = 1.59×10^-10 S/m
    From dark current slope (Fig.3c); underpins the σ_dark-dominated regime in Eq13.
  • Fit constants a3, b3, c1, d for VBPE(d) = not reported
    Four-parameter fit to the thickness dependence in Fig.3e, used to claim Eq12 describes the data.
  • Effective electrode area for current density = electrode length × light penetration depth
    Ad hoc choice to convert measured current to JBPE; light penetration depth is taken from a thin film, not on the single-crystal device.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption C2v point-group symmetry and shift-current tensor form for EPB
    Eqs1–2 and Supplementary Note assume this symmetry; it determines which tensor components are probed.
  • domain assumption Net polarization is purely in-plane; vertical projections cancel
    Structural projection argument (Fig.1, Supplementary Fig.2); the 'nonpolar vertical' label is load-bearing for the anisotropy claim and is not directly measured by poling or pyroelectric tests.
  • standard math Beer-Lambert exponential absorption and constant quantum yield φ
    Eqs5–6; assumes no saturation, no inhomogeneous refractive index, and no depth-dependent quantum yield.
  • domain assumption Local photoconductivity σ_x = n e µ with n = g_x τ
    Eq7; assumes trap-free, bimolecular-free recombination and constant mobility in depth.
  • ad hoc to paper V_BPE can be computed as J_BPE/σ using a thickness-averaged σ
    Eqs8–12; for a series circuit with depth-varying σ the correct relation is V=J∫dx/σ(x), so the average-conductivity form is a modeling choice, not a derived Ohm's-law result.
  • domain assumption Thick crystals are σ_dark-dominated along vertical
    Inferred from similar dark and illuminated J-V slopes (Fig.3c); this controls the predicted V∝I0 regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Composition Anisotropy Drives Large Bulk Photovoltaic Fields Along the Non-polar Vertical Direction in 2D Hybrid Perovskite Ferroelectrics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HQBXRTTA

@misc{pith2026260722261,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Composition Anisotropy Drives Large Bulk Photovoltaic Fields Along the Non-polar Vertical Direction in 2D Hybrid Perovskite Ferroelectrics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HQBXRTTA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22261}
}
read the original abstract

The photovoltaic electric field of the bulk photovoltaic effect (BPE) reflects the intrinsic ability of ferroelectrics to separate photoexcited excitons into electrons and holes, and are essential parameters for applications such as voltage-readout photodetectors. Because polarization defines the cation-anion displacement and noncentrosymmetric axis, the polar direction is generally one of the orientations exhibiting strong bulk photovoltaic field (EBPE). Here, we report emergent BPE behavior in 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectrics (HPFs), where EBPE can be two orders of magnitude higher along the vertical nonpolar direction than along the polar in-plane direction. Its magnitude is up to orders of magnitude higher than that of benchmark photoferroelectrics across different material systems and is the highest among 2D HPFs reported so far. This strong BPE response with emergent directional anisotropy originates from the unique coupling among the shift-current BPE mechanism, an efficient photocarrier-generating inorganic part, and an insulator-like organic part, a combination that is conflicting or inaccessible in traditional photoferroelectrics. This composition and anisotropy also produce basic BPE behavior distinct from that of typical photoferroelectrics, including a laser intensity dependent photovoltage and a nonlinear scaling of photovoltage with material dimension. We analyze and develop a series of formulas to describe the emergent photovoltage phenomena, which should be applicable to this novel 2D ferroelectrics family and to polar systems with similar anisotropy and robust photoelectric response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22261 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1. Crystal structure and ferroelectric properties of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bulk photovoltaic characterization of EPB along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bulk photovoltaic characterization along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y . Gong, R. Duan, Y . Hu, Y . Wu, S. Zhu, X. Wang, Q. Wang, S.P . Lau, Z. Liu, B.K. Tay , Reconfigurable and nonvolatile ferroelectric bulk photovoltaics based on 3R -WS2 for machine vision, Nat. Commun., 16 (2025) 230

    2025

  2. [2]

    Wang, X.-G

    Z.-X. Wang, X.-G. Chen, X.-J. Song, Y .-L. Zeng, P .-F . Li, Y .-Y . Tang, W.-Q. Liao, R.-G. Xiong, Domain memory effect in the organic ferroics, Nat. Commun., 13 (2022) 2379

    2022

  3. [3]

    Grinberg, D.V

    I. Grinberg, D.V. West, M. Torres, G. Gou, D.M. Stein, L. Wu, G. Chen, E.M. Gallo, A.R. Akbashev, P .K. Davies, J.E. Spanier, A.M. Rappe, Perovskite oxides for visible-light-absorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials, Nature, 503 (2013) 509-512

    2013

  4. [4]

    S. Y . Yang, J. Seidel, S.J. Byrnes, P . Shafer, C.H. Yang, M.D. Rossell, P . Yu, Y .H. Chu, J.F . Scott, J.W. Ager, L.W. Martin, R. Ramesh, Above-bandgap voltages from ferroelectric photovoltaic devices, Nature Nanotechnology, 5 (2010) 143-147

    2010

  5. [5]

    Pusch, U

    A. Pusch, U. Römer, D. Culcer, N.J. Ekins -Daukes, Energy Conversion Efficiency of the Bulk Photovoltaic Effect, PRX Energy, 2 (2023) 013006

    2023

  6. [6]

    F . Wang, T. Zhang, R. Xie, Z. Wang, W. Hu, How to characterize figures of merit of two - dimensional photodetectors, Nat. Commun., 14 (2023) 2224

    2023

  7. [7]

    Paillard, G

    C. Paillard, G. Geneste, L. Bellaiche, J. Kreisel, J. Kreisel, M. Alexe, B. Dkhil, Photovoltaics in Ferroelectric Materials: Origin, Challenges and Opportunities, Emerging Photovoltaic Materials2018, pp. 103 -140

  8. [8]

    S. Liu, F . Zheng, A.M. Rappe, Giant Bulk Photovoltaic Effect in Vinylene -Linked Hybrid Heterocyclic Polymer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 121 (2017) 6500 -6507

    2017

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Glass, D

    A.M. Glass, D. von der Linde, D.H. Auston, T.J. Negran, Excited state polarization, bulk photovoltaic effect and the photorefractive effect in electrically polarized media, J. Electron. Mater., 4 (1975) 915-943

    1975

  2. [10]

    Nakamura, S

    M. Nakamura, S. Horiuchi, F . Kagawa, N. Ogawa, T. Kurumaji, Y . Tokura, M. Kawasaki, Shift current photovoltaic effect in a ferroelectric charge -transfer complex, Nat. Commun., 8 (2017) 281

    2017

  3. [11]

    Cuono, S

    G. Cuono, S. Bandyopadhyay, A. Droghetti, S. Picozzi, Bulk photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric and antiferroelectric phases of antimony sulphoiodide investigated by means of of Physical Review Materials, 9 (2025) 064412

    2025

  4. [12]

    Schirmer, M

    O.F . Schirmer, M. Imlau, C. Merschjann, Bulk photovoltaic effect of LiNbO${}_{3}$:Fe and its small-polaron-based microscopic interpretation, Phys. Rev. B, 83 (2011) 165106. 18

    2011

  5. [13]

    Muddam, L.K

    R.S. Muddam, L.K. Jagadamma, Ferroelectric polarization in 2D halide hybrid perovskites: influence on bulk crystals, thin films, and applications, J. Mater. Chem. C, 13 (2025) 10488 -10506

    2025

  6. [14]

    Mu, H.-Y

    X. Mu, H.-Y . Zhang, L. Xu, Y .-Y . Xu, H. Peng, Y .-Y . Tang, R.-G. Xiong, Ferroelectrochemistry, APL Materials, 9 (2021) 051112

    2021

  7. [15]

    M. -M. Yang, Z. -D. Luo, D.J. Kim, M. Alexe, Bulk photovoltaic effect in monodomain BiFeO3 thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett., 110 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Mistewicz, M

    K. Mistewicz, M. Nowak, D. Stróż, A Ferroelectric-Photovoltaic Effect in SbSI Nanowires, Nanomaterials, 9 (2019) 580

    2019

  9. [17]

    H. Xu, X. Hu, F . Sun, J. Sun, W. Guo, Y . Liu, W. Liu, X. Fu, J. Luo, Z. Sun, Visible-Photoactive Ferroelectric Semiconductor Incorporating Aromatic Dynamic Spacer Enables Optoelectronic Synaptic Plasticity, Adv. Mater., 37 (2025) 2504953

    2025

  10. [18]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.xxx.xxxxxx for additional information on methods, BPE photocurrent density calculation, AFM and more specific photoelectric results. , DOI

    doi

  11. [19]

    S. Wang, X. Liu, L. Li, C. Ji, Z. Sun, Z. Wu, M. Hong, J. Luo, An Unprecedented Biaxial Trilayered Hybrid Perovskite Ferroelectric with Directionally Tunable Photovoltaic Effects, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 141 (2019) 7693 -7697

    2019

  12. [20]

    Sha, Y .-A

    T.-T. Sha, Y .-A. Xiong, Q. Pan, X.-G. Chen, X.-J. Song, J. Yao, S.-R. Miao, Z.-Y . Jing, Z.-J. Feng, Y.-M. You, R.-G. Xiong, Fluorinated 2D Lead Iodide Perovskite Ferroelectrics, Adv. Mater., 31 (2019) 1901843

    2019

  13. [21]

    W.-Q. Liao, D. Zhao, Y .-Y . Tang, Y . Zhang, P .-F . Li, P .-P . Shi, X.-G. Chen, Y .-M. You, R.-G. Xiong, A molecular perovskite solid solution with piezoelectricity stronger than lead zirconate titanate, Science, 363 (2019) 1206 -1210

    2019

  14. [22]

    Sturman, V

    B. Sturman, V. Fridkin, Photovoltaic and photo-refractive effects in noncentrosymmetric materials, Routledge1992

  15. [23]

    Z. Xu, X. Dong, L. Wang, H. Wu, Y . Liu, J. Luo, M. Hong, L. Li, Precisely Tailoring a FAPbI3- Derived Ferroelectric for Sensitive Self-Driven Broad-Spectrum Polarized Photodetection, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 145 (2023) 1524 -1529

    2023

  16. [24]

    W. Guo, H. Xu, Y . Ma, Y . Liu, B. Wang, L. Tang, L. Hua, J. Luo, Z. Sun, The Unprecedented Highest-Layer-Number Ferroelectric Semiconductor of 2D Homologous Single -Phase Perovskites Tailored by Regulating Thickness of Inorganic Frameworks, Adv. Funct. Mater., 32 (2022) 2207854

    2022

  17. [25]

    S. Y . Yang, L.W. Martin, S.J. Byrnes, T.E. Conry, S.R. Basu, D. Paran, L. Reichertz, J. Ihlefeld, C. Adamo, A. Melville, Y .H. Chu, C.H. Yang, J.L. Musfeldt, D.G. Schlom, J.W. Ager, III, R. Ramesh, Photovoltaic effects in BiFeO3, Appl. Phys. Lett., 95 (2009) 062909

    2009

  18. [26]

    Hung, C.S

    C.M. Hung, C.S. Tu, W.D. Yen, L.S. Jou, M.D. Jiang, V.H. Schmidt, Photovoltaic phenomena in BiFeO3 multiferroic ceramics, J. Appl. Phys., 111 (2012) 07D912

    2012

  19. [27]

    Sheng, I

    Y . Sheng, I. Fina, M. Gospodinov, A.M. Schankler, A.M. Rappe, J. Fontcuberta, Bulk photovoltaic effect in hexagonal LuMnO3 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B, 104 (2021) 184116

    2021

  20. [28]

    Lopez-Varo, L

    P . Lopez-Varo, L. Bertoluzzi, J. Bisquert, M. Alexe, M. Coll, J. Huang, J.A. Jimenez-Tejada, T. Kirchartz, R. Nechache, F . Rosei, Y . Yuan, Physical aspects of ferroelectric semiconductors for photovoltaic solar energy conversion, Physics Reports, 653 (2016) 1-40. 19

    2016

  21. [29]

    W. Li, Y . Ma, Y . Liu, H. Xu, W. Guo, Q. Fan, L. Tang, H. Rong, J. Luo, Z. Sun, Halogen substitution strategy of spacer cations in two -dimensional perovskite ferroelectrics gives giant anomalous photovoltaic effect, Nat. Commun., 16 (2025) 7535

    2025

  22. [30]

    B. Wang, W. Guo, Y . Liu, H. Xu, Q. Fan, L. Hua, L. Tang, S. Han, J. Luo, Z. Sun, Exceptionally Strong Self -Powered Polarization Behaviors Involving with Bulk Photovoltaics in Highly Anisotropic 2D Hybrid Perovskite Ferroelectric Crystals, Chem. Mater., 35 (2023) 4007-4014

    2023

  23. [31]

    X. Liu, S. Wang, P . Long, L. Li, Y . Peng, Z. Xu, S. Han, Z. Sun, M. Hong, J. Luo, Polarization- Driven Self -Powered Photodetection in a Single -Phase Biaxial Hybrid Perovskite Ferroelectric, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 58 (2019) 14504 -14508

    2019

  24. [32]

    S. Han, Y . Ma, L. Hua, L. Tang, B. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Luo, Soft Multiaxial Molecular Ferroelectric Thin Films with Self -Powered Broadband Photodetection, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144 (2022) 20315 -20322

    2022

  25. [33]

    Bube, Photoelectronic properties of semiconductors, Cambridge University Press1992

    R.H. Bube, Photoelectronic properties of semiconductors, Cambridge University Press1992

  26. [34]

    W. Li, J. Cui, D. Zheng, W. Wang, S. Wang, S. Song, H. Liu, Y . Kong, J. Xu, Fabrication and Characteristics of Heavily Fe-Doped LiNbO3/Si Heterojunction, Materials, 12 (2019) 2659

    2019

  27. [35]

    Sebastián-Vicente, J

    C. Sebastián-Vicente, J. Imbrock, S. Laubrock, O. Caballero-Calero, A. García-Cabañes, M. Carrascosa, All -Optical Domain Inversion in LiNbO3 Crystals by Visible Continuous - Wave Laser Irradiation, ACS Photonics, 11 (2024) 2624-2636

    2024

  28. [36]

    D.V. Kuzenko, Frequency -Dependent Temperature Activation of Conductivity and Dielectric Constant of Magnetoelectric BiFeO3, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics, 88 (2024) S13-S18

    2024

  29. [37]

    Singh, Z.R

    A. Singh, Z.R. Khan, P .M. Vilarinho, V. Gupta, R.S. Katiyar, Influence of thickness on optical and structural properties of BiFeO3 thin films: PLD grown, Mater. Res. Bull., 49 (2014) 531-536

    2014

  30. [38]

    Blázquez Martínez, P

    A. Blázquez Martínez, P . Grysan, S. Girod, S. Glinsek, T. Granzow, Direct evidence for bulk photovoltaic charge transport in a ferroelectric polycrystalline film, Scripta Mater., 211 (2022) 114498

    2022

  31. [39]

    Swaminathan, S.S

    V. Swaminathan, S.S. Pramana, T.J. White, L. Chen, R. Chukka, R.V. Ramanujan, Microwave Synthesis of Noncentrosymmetric BaTiO3 Truncated Nanocubes for Charge Storage Applications, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2 (2010) 3037-3042

    2010

  32. [40]

    Basu, L.W

    S.R. Basu, L.W. Martin, Y .H. Chu, M. Gajek, R. Ramesh, R.C. Rai, X. Xu, J.L. Musfeldt, Photoconductivity in BiFeO3 thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (2008) 091905

    2008

  33. [41]

    Zhang, M.-M

    H.-B. Zhang, M.-M. Yang, M. Alexe, Boosting the Photocurrent in BiFeO3 Thin Films via a Domain-Wall-Defect Interaction, Advanced Photonics Research, 4 (2023) 2200189

    2023

  34. [42]

    H. Wei, Y . Fang, P . Mulligan, W. Chuirazzi, H.-H. Fang, C. Wang, B.R. Ecker, Y . Gao, M.A. Loi, L. Cao, J. Huang, Sensitive X -ray detectors made of methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite single crystals, Nature Photonics, 10 (2016) 333-339

    2016

  35. [43]

    Y . Hu, H. Lu, S.B. Masood, C. Göhler, S. Liu, A. Gruverman, M. Alexe, A 2D hybrid perovskite ferroelectric with switchable polarization and photoelectric robustness down to monolayer, Nat. Commun., 16 (2025) 3028

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.