Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Multiplexed storage and interaction of Rydberg spinwaves via the gradient echo memory protocol

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A four-beam magic-angle scheme stores Rydberg light memories about ten times longer

desk verdict GEM plus Rydberg finally works—provided the four-photon loop really closes; the data are consistent and the limitations are honestly reported, so send it to referees. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22466 v1 pith:QDF575ER submitted 2026-07-24 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Bartosz Niewelt , Stanis{l}aw Kurzyna , Bartosz Kasza , Wojciech Wasilewski , Micha{l} Parniak This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords Rydbergspinwavesgradientechomemorymotionaldephasingwavevectorcancellationmultimodequantuminteractionsmicrowavecontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates a way to generate collective Rydberg excitations whose total momentum is nearly zero, so that the usual thermal-motion dephasing that destroys Rydberg spinwaves within about two microseconds is suppressed. The scheme adds two off-resonant driving beams, arranged so the wavevectors of all four light fields form a closed loop; the stored spinwave then survives about twenty microseconds, approaching the radiative lifetime limit. Because the interface remains off-resonant, it works together with the frequency-to-position mapping of a gradient echo memory, allowing several optical modes to be stored side by side as Rydberg spinwaves and manipulated with microwave pulses. The authors use this to control attenuation between stored modes via Rydberg-Rydberg interactions and to diffract a retrieved signal off a stored interaction grating.

What carries the argument

The key object is the four-photon Ń configuration: two auxiliary off-resonant beams (N1 and N2) crossed at angle α ≈ 36.4° are added to the counterpropagating probe and coupling beams so their wavevectors close a loop, leaving the collective ground-Rydberg coherence with near-zero wavevector. The GEM magnetic-field gradient maps spectral components to spatial positions along the ensemble, and a microwave field rotates the Rydberg coherence between neighboring states |s⟩ and |p⟩, acting as the interaction switch. Together these let the memory store multiple modes and turn on strong Rydberg-Rydberg interactions at chosen positions.

What would settle it

Measure retrieved echo efficiency versus storage time at two or more ensemble temperatures. If the spinwave momentum is truly near zero, the Gaussian decay time should be nearly temperature independent and set by the Rydberg radiative lifetime; a visible shortening at higher temperature would reveal a residual wavevector and weaken the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a four-photon 'Ń-shaped' excitation path—probe, two auxiliary drive beams crossed at a magic angle, and a coupling beam—creates a Rydberg spinwave with wavevector k_s = k_c + k_p − k_N1 + k_N2 ≈ 0, which is almost insensitive to atomic motion. The paper supports this with a measured Gaussian memory lifetime of τ = (20.7 ± 0.9) µs, compared with 2.3 µs for the standard two-photon ladder scheme, bringing storage times close to the 96 µs radiative limit of the Rydberg state. On that basis the authors claim the scheme reestablishes compatibility between Rydberg excitations and gradient echo memory, and they demonstrate two consequences: microwave-controlled attenuation

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the beam geometry satisfies k_s ≈ 0 closely enough that the residual wavevector is negligible; the paper infers this from the long Gaussian lifetime rather than measuring the spinwave momentum directly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stored Rydberg spinwaves can be read out after tens of microseconds, long enough for gradient echo rephasing and multi-pulse sequences.
  • Multiple temporal or spectral modes can be stored simultaneously and addressed separately, enabling multiplexed quantum memory with strong interactions.
  • Microwave pulses control which Rydberg state the stored coherence occupies, so interaction-induced decay between modes can be switched on and off.
  • About 100 control excitations at a density of roughly 196 mm^-3 attenuate a stored signal by 50% in 14 µs, a gate strength consistent with theory.
  • The same closed-loop wavevector idea transfers to other Rydberg ladder schemes in alkali atoms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication left implicit in the paper is that the near-zero-wavevector trick should make Rydberg-GEM memories viable in warm vapours, where thermal motion is much faster; the lifetime gain would be larger than in a cold atom trap.
  • The interaction-controlled diffraction amounts to a programmable time-domain grating; one could extend it to store a superposition of several gratings and perform linear-optics-style processing on the retrieved pulse.
  • If the residual wavevector is indeed the only long-time decay channel, raising the ensemble temperature should have almost no effect on the early Gaussian decay; measuring that scaling would directly test the zero-momentum assumption.
  • The demonstrated attenuation gate could, with single-photon-level control pulses, approach a deterministic photon-photon switch inside a quantum memory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental implementation of a four-photon 'Ń' excitation scheme in a cold 87Rb ensemble that couples a probe field to a Rydberg spinwave with nominally zero net wavevector. The authors report a storage lifetime of τ = 20.7 ± 0.9 µs, which they compare with a calculated two-photon thermal limit of 2.3 µs. They further use a GEM magnetic-field gradient to store multiple modes, apply microwave coupling to a neighboring Rydberg state to demonstrate interaction-controlled attenuation (single-excitation decay rate g1 = 0.63 ± 0.08 kHz, compared with a theory value 0.56 ± 0.13 kHz), and demonstrate interaction-controlled diffraction of a retrieved pulse. Simulations based on coupled optical-Bloch propagation equations are used throughout, and the data are deposited.

Significance. If the near-zero momentum transfer claim is established, this is a valuable advance: it addresses the main obstacle to combining Rydberg excitations with GEM and offers a route to multimode Rydberg quantum memories with controllable interactions. The paper's concrete strengths include a direct measurement of the interaction-induced attenuation rate with an independent theory value (C3 taken from the ARC library rather than fitted to the data), a GEM-based mode-multiplexing sequence, a deposited dataset, and a clear path toward spatially controlled Rydberg interactions. The interaction-controlled attenuation measurement is internally consistent and does not rely on circular parameter adjustment, since the predicted g1 is not fitted to the measured value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1 / Eq. (1)] The central claim that the stored spinwave has near-zero wavevector rests on Eq. (1) and on a single Gaussian lifetime fit at one crossing angle. The residual k_s is never measured; the long-time decay is attributed in the text to 'small misalignment of N1 and N2 beams' without a quantitative bound. Alternative mechanisms (magnetic-field inhomogeneity across the 5 mm cloud, AC-Stark gradients from the intense N1/N2 beams, or a distribution of k_s from the diverging beam geometry) can produce similar 20 µs decays. I request a control experiment: scan the N1–N2 crossing angle and show the lifetime peaks at the closed-loop condition, or measure k_s directly (e.g., phase-sensitive/heterodyne readout), or at least provide a quantitative alignment bound showing k_s is as small as claimed. Without this, the 'near-zero momentum transfer' assertion is underdetermined.
  2. [Abstract / Fig. 1e] The 'almost tenfold' lifetime extension is quoted relative to a calculated thermal limit τ_th = 2.3 µs, not relative to a measured two-photon spinwave lifetime in the same apparatus. The two-photon baseline could differ from the ideal value because of the finite Rabi frequencies, magnetic fields, and beam geometry used here. Please either measure the unmodified (two-photon) spinwave decay under identical experimental conditions or explicitly state that the improvement factor is relative to the modeled thermal limit rather than to a measured baseline.
  3. [Sec. 4.3 / Eqs. (2), (5)] The simulated readout in Fig. 3d depends on at least two inputs that are not specified as independently determined: a 'small relative phase between these pulses, which results from a nonzero four-photon detuning' and an exponential readout decay with τe = 3 µs 'which reflects the additional observed decay during readout.' As written, these are free parameters that can shape the predicted sideband structure. Please state how they were obtained (e.g., fit, independent calibration) and show the sensitivity of the simulated diffraction pattern to them, for instance by varying τe and the phase over their plausible ranges.
  4. [Sec. 2 / Eq. (1)] The sign convention in Eq. (1) is ambiguous. The text defines the probe wavevector as k_p = -k_p \hat z and states that the two-photon spinwave wavevector is k_s = k_c - k_p, yet Eq. (1) is written as k_s = k_c + k_p - k_N1 + k_N2. With the signed definition this is consistent, but a reader taking magnitudes will misread the loop condition. Moreover, the text says N1 and N2 are 'crossed at an angle α≈36.4° in the atomic ensemble' and earlier 'at an angle α to the z-axis' without specifying the orientation of their transverse components. Since α is the 'magic angle' on which the closed-loop condition depends, please define all wavevectors as signed vectors and derive α explicitly from Eq. (1).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, configuration III] The sentence 'we observe that the signal pulse (1st) follows the Rabi oscillation of the gating pulse (2nd)' appears to invert the order described in the sequence (gating pulse is first, signal second). Please correct the pulse numbering.
  2. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 5] Typos: 'couter-propagates' should be 'counter-propagates' and 'adress' should be 'address'.
  3. [Sec. 4.1] Please report the fit range and goodness-of-fit (e.g., reduced χ²) for the Gaussian decay, and show residuals if possible; the text notes a long-time acceleration, so the single-Gaussian fit quality is relevant.
  4. [Sec. 2.1 vs Sec. 4.2] The text states reversal and rephasing take about 16.9 µs, while t_int = 14 µs is used for the interaction-induced decay. Please clarify what portion of the sequence is included in the 14 µs interaction time.
  5. [Fig. 1e caption] The solid line labeled 'Rydberg spinwave decay without the lifetime extension protocol' appears to be a calculated curve; please indicate explicitly in the caption that this is a theoretical/model curve rather than measured data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central lifetime and interaction results are direct measurements; the same-group citation [52] is corroborative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain, the central results are direct measurements rather than predictions forced by their inputs. The lifetime extension is a measured Gaussian decay (τ=20.7±0.9 µs) compared with the standard two-photon thermally limited decay; Eq. (1) is a geometric closure condition used to design the beam angles, not a quantity fitted to the lifetime data. The controlled-attenuation result is likewise a direct measurement of retrieved photons fitted to an exponential decay, with the extracted single-excitation rate g1=(0.63±0.08) kHz compared with an independent estimate g1,theory=2Q/V based on C3 from the external ARC library [59]. The same-group preprint [52] supplies the analytic form of the interaction-induced decay and the comparison model, but the attenuation observation and diffraction sidebands do not reduce to that citation: the simulations are driven by independently stated physical parameters, and the only explicit post-fit is the acknowledged rescaling and readout-decay exponential. The paper's own limitation—that the residual k_s is inferred from a single-angle lifetime fit and attributed to misalignment—is an under-determination of the zero-momentum interpretation, not a definitional circularity: the paper never defines the predicted lifetime in terms of the measured one, nor fits Eq. (1) to the data. Thus no circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity; the only mild concern is the same-group citation [52], which is not load-bearing for the central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement rests mainly on the wavevector geometry and a standard Gaussian dephasing model; the interaction demonstrations additionally rely on the dephasing model of [52] and on fitted exponential/scaling adjustments in the diffraction simulation. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • g1 (interaction-decay rate per Rydberg excitation) = 0.63 ± 0.08 kHz
    Extracted from the fit of retrieved signal photons vs MW rotation angle (Fig. 2c,d). Compared to g1,theory=0.56±0.13 kHz, so it is an experimental result rather than a model input.
  • τe (readout decay time constant in diffraction simulation) = 3 µs
    Ad hoc exponential multiplier applied to the simulated readout to match the observed 'additional decay during readout' (Sec. 4.3, Fig. 3d).
  • Readout amplitude scale factor = not specified
    Simulated readout curves are 'scaled' to match experimental counts (Sec. 4.3, Fig. 3d); the scale factor is not quantified.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Adiabatic elimination plus first-order expansion in probe Rabi frequency describes the effective four-photon dynamics (Appendix A).
    Yields Eqs. (2) and (5); requires intermediate-state populations to remain small.
  • domain assumption Motional dephasing of a spinwave with wavevector k_s follows η_th(t)=exp[-(t/τ_th)^2] with τ_th=(v_th k_s)^-1.
    Used in Sec. 2 to define the 2.3 µs thermal limit against which the lifetime gain is quoted.
  • domain assumption GEM frequency-to-position mapping is δ(z)=βz and reversing the gradient rephases the stored coherence.
    Standard GEM model (Sec. 2.1); underpins the temporal-multiplexing and diffraction demonstrations.
  • domain assumption Rydberg interaction-induced dephasing is γrr = 2Q n(z)|ρgp|^2/V with Q=(4π²/9)√3 C3/ℏ (Appendix B).
    Two-particle excluded-volume dephasing model taken from same-group preprint [52]; used to simulate attenuation and diffraction.
  • domain assumption The number of stored excitations n̄1 is inferred by dividing readout counts by storage efficiency (Sec. 4.2).
    Needed to convert attenuation data to per-excitation rate g1; sensitive to the independently estimated efficiency.
  • domain assumption The four-photon transition is driven through far-off-resonant virtual states, so intermediate-state decay and GEM broadening do not spoil the process (Secs. 2 and 3).
    Justifies the closed-loop excitation scheme's compatibility with GEM; relies on the detunings being large compared to the memory bandwidth.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiplexed storage and interaction of Rydberg spinwaves via the gradient echo memory protocol." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDF575ER

@misc{pith2026260722466,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiplexed storage and interaction of Rydberg spinwaves via the gradient echo memory protocol},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDF575ER}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22466}
}
read the original abstract

Collective Rydberg excitations offer strong and controllable interactions for quantum information processing, sensing, and nonlinear quantum optics, but their integration with temporally or spectrally multiplexed schemes, such as the Gradient Echo Memory (GEM) protocol, is hindered by rapid motional dephasing caused by the large spinwave wavevector. We demonstrate a new type of multi-photon addressing and interfacing scheme (with levels following the shape of the letter \'{N}) that allows us to generate collective Rydberg excitations with near-zero momentum transfer, extending the Rydberg spinwave lifetime almost tenfold. The scheme relies on two additional off-resonant driving fields arranged at a magic angle, forming a closed wavevector loop while remaining compatible with GEM-induced inhomogeneous broadening. This enables storage and manipulation of long-lived Rydberg spinwaves in a multimode quantum memory. Using microwave coupling between neighboring Rydberg states, we can control the attenuation between stored excitation modes by interaction-induced decay and demonstrate interaction-controlled diffraction of a retrieved optical signal. Our results reestablish compatibility between Rydberg excitations and GEM, providing a route toward multimode quantum memories with controllable long-range interactions and applications in quantum networking, sensing, and quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22466 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Energy levels structure of 87Rb relevant in the experiment for the Rydberg GEM interface, (b) Simplified scheme of the experimental setup for storing Rydberg co￾herence in the GEM. (c) Geometrical representation of the beams’ wavevectors used to instantaneously create the spin￾wave with reduced wavevector. Grey dashed arrow represents uncompensated spinwave wavevector ks in a typical ladder￾type scheme. (d) Simp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Controlled attenuation of the readout for different rotation angles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Interaction-induced diffraction. (a) Sequence of operations (upper plot) and the simulation of the memory contents, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Observation of rydberg blockade between two atoms

    E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isen- hower, D. D. Yavuz, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman. “Observation of rydberg blockade between two atoms”. Nature Physics5, 110– 114 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Observation of collective excitation of two individual atoms in the ryd- berg blockade regime

    Alpha Gaëtan, Yevhen Miroshnychenko, Tatjana Wilk, Amodsen Chotia, Matthieu Viteau, Daniel Comparat, Pierre Pillet, Antoine Browaeys, and Philippe Grangier. “Observation of collective excitation of two individual atoms in the ryd- berg blockade regime”. Nature Physics5, 115– 118 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Demonstration of a neutral atom controlled-not quantum gate

    L. Isenhower, E. Urban, X. L. Zhang, A. T. Gill, T. Henage, T. A. Johnson, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman. “Demonstration of a neutral atom controlled-not quantum gate”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010503 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multi- qubit gates with neutral atoms

    Harry Levine, Alexander Keesling, Giulia Se- meghini, Ahmed Omran, Tout T. Wang, Sepehr Ebadi, Hannes Bernien, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, Hannes Pichler, and Mikhail D. Lukin. “Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multi- qubit gates with neutral atoms”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170503 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum com- puter

    Simon J. Evered, Dolev Bluvstein, Marcin Kali- nowski, Sepehr Ebadi, Tom Manovitz, Hengyun Zhou, Sophie H. Li, Alexandra A. Geim, Tout T. Wang, Nishad Maskara, Harry Levine, Giulia Se- meghini, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. Lukin. “High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum com- puter”. Nature622, 268–272 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    All-optical quantum information processing using rydberg gates

    D. Paredes-Barato and C. S. Adams. “All-optical quantum information processing using rydberg gates”. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 040501 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays

    Dolev Bluvstein, Simon J. Evered, Alexan- dra A. Geim, Sophie H. Li, Hengyun Zhou, Tom Manovitz, Sepehr Ebadi, Madelyn Cain, MarcinKalinowski, DominikHangleiter, J.Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Nishad Maskara, Iris Cong, Xun Gao, Pedro Sales Rodriguez, Thomas Karolyshyn, Giulia Semeghini, Michael J. Gul- lans, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. Lukin...

    2024

  8. [8]

    Quantum nonlinear op- tics — photon by photon

    Darrick E. Chang, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. Lukin. “Quantum nonlinear op- tics — photon by photon”. Nature Photonics8, 685–694 (2014)

    2014

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Attractive photons in a 7 quantum nonlinear medium

    Ofer Firstenberg, Thibault Peyronel, Qi-Yu Liang, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Vladan Vuletić. “Attractive photons in a 7 quantum nonlinear medium”. Nature502, 71– 75 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Hong-ou- mandel interference between two deterministic collective excitations in an atomic ensemble

    Jun Li, Ming-Ti Zhou, Bo Jing, Xu-Jie Wang, Sheng-Jun Yang, Xiao Jiang, Klaus Mølmer, Xiao-Hui Bao, and Jian-Wei Pan. “Hong-ou- mandel interference between two deterministic collective excitations in an atomic ensemble”. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 180501 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Entangle- ment between light and an optical atomic exci- tation

    L. Li, Y. O. Dudin, and A. Kuzmich. “Entangle- ment between light and an optical atomic exci- tation”. Nature498, 466–469 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Cooperative atom-light interaction in a block- aded rydberg ensemble

    J. D. Pritchard, D. Maxwell, A. Gauguet, K. J. Weatherill, M. P. A. Jones, and C. S. Adams. “Cooperative atom-light interaction in a block- aded rydberg ensemble”. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 193603 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Enhancement of rydberg-mediated single-photon nonlinearities by electrically tuned förster resonances

    H. Gorniaczyk, C. Tresp, P. Bienias, A. Paris- Mandoki, W. Li, I. Mirgorodskiy, H. P. Büchler, I. Lesanovsky, and S. Hofferberth. “Enhancement of rydberg-mediated single-photon nonlinearities by electrically tuned förster resonances”. Nature Communications7, 12480 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Strongly inter- acting rydberg excitations of a cold atomic gas

    Y. O. Dudin and A. Kuzmich. “Strongly inter- acting rydberg excitations of a cold atomic gas”. Science336, 887–889 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Accu- rate mapping of multilevel rydberg atoms on in- teracting spin-1/2particles for the quantum sim- ulation of ising models

    Sylvain de Léséleuc, Sebastian Weber, Vincent Lienhard, Daniel Barredo, Hans Peter Büchler, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys. “Accu- rate mapping of multilevel rydberg atoms on in- teracting spin-1/2particles for the quantum sim- ulation of ising models”. Phys. Rev. Lett.1...

    2018

  8. [16]

    Coherent excitation transfer in a spin chain of three rydberg atoms

    Daniel Barredo, Henning Labuhn, Sylvain Ravets, Thierry Lahaye, Antoine Browaeys, and Charles S. Adams. “Coherent excitation transfer in a spin chain of three rydberg atoms”. Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 113002 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Towards quantum simu- lation with circular rydberg atoms

    T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cor- tiñas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dot- senko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, Th. Joli- coeur, and M. Brune. “Towards quantum simu- lation with circular rydberg atoms”. Phys. Rev. X8, 011032 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Quantum simulation of 2d antiferro- magnets with hundreds of rydberg atoms

    Pascal Scholl, Michael Schuler, Hannah J. Williams, Alexander A. Eberharter, Daniel Barredo, Kai-Niklas Schymik, Vincent Lienhard, Louis-Paul Henry, Thomas C. Lang, Thierry Lahaye, Andreas M. Läuchli, and Antoine Browaeys. “Quantum simulation of 2d antiferro- magnets with hund...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Quantum kibble–zurek mech- anism and critical dynamics on a programmable rydberg simulator

    Alexander Keesling, Ahmed Omran, Harry Levine, Hannes Bernien, Hannes Pichler, Soon- won Choi, Rhine Samajdar, Sylvain Schwartz, Pietro Silvi, Subir Sachdev, Peter Zoller, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. Lukin. “Quantum kibble–zurek mech- anism an...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two-dimensional rydberg gas

    Peter Schauß, Marc Cheneau, Manuel Endres, Takeshi Fukuhara, Sebastian Hild, Ahmed Om- ran, Thomas Pohl, Christian Gross, Stefan Kuhr, and Immanuel Bloch. “Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two-dimensional rydberg gas”. Nature491, 87–91 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Collectively encoded rydberg qubit

    Nicholas L. R. Spong, Yuechun Jiao, Oliver D. W. Hughes, Kevin J. Weatherill, Igor Lesanovsky, and Charles S. Adams. “Collectively encoded rydberg qubit”. Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 063604 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Continuous wideband microwave-to-optical converter based on room-temperature rydberg atoms

    Sebastian Borówka, Uliana Pylypenko, Mateusz Mazelanik, and Michał Parniak. “Continuous wideband microwave-to-optical converter based on room-temperature rydberg atoms”. Nature Photonics18, 32–38 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Rydberg atom reception of a handheld uhf frequency-modulated two-way radio

    Noah Schlossberger, Tate McDonald, Nikunjku- mar Prajapati, and Christopher L. Holloway. “Rydberg atom reception of a handheld uhf frequency-modulated two-way radio”. Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 024031 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    Warm rydberg atom-based quadrature amplitude-modulated receiver

    Jan Nowosielski, Marcin Jastrzębski, Pavel Halavach, Karol Łukanowski, Marcin Jarzyna, Mateusz Mazelanik, Wojciech Wasilewski, and Michał Parniak. “Warm rydberg atom-based quadrature amplitude-modulated receiver”. Opt. Express32, 30027–30039 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Rydberg-atom-based system for benchmarking millimeter-wave automotive radar chips

    Sebastian Borówka, Wiktor Krokosz, Mateusz Mazelanik, Wojciech Wasilewski, and Michał Parniak. “Rydberg-atom-based system for benchmarking millimeter-wave automotive radar chips”. Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 034067 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Efficient microwave-to-optical con- version using rydberg atoms

    Thibault Vogt, Christian Gross, Jingshan Han, Sambit B. Pal, Mark Lam, Martin Kiffner, and Wenhui Li. “Efficient microwave-to-optical con- version using rydberg atoms”. Phys. Rev. A99, 023832 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Quantum-enabled millimetre wave to optical transduction using neutral atoms

    Aishwarya Kumar, Aziza Suleymanzade, Mark Stone, Lavanya Taneja, Alexander Anferov, David I. Schuster, and Jonathan Simon. “Quantum-enabled millimetre wave to optical transduction using neutral atoms”. Nature615, 614–619 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Evidence for coherent collective rydberg excitation in the strong block- ade regime

    Rolf Heidemann, Ulrich Krohn, Vera Bend- kowsky, Björn Butscher, Robert Löw, Luis San- tos, and Tilman Pfau. “Evidence for coherent collective rydberg excitation in the strong block- ade regime”. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 163601 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Many- body decoherence dynamics and optimized oper- ation of a single-photon switch

    C R Murray, A V Gorshkov, and T Pohl. “Many- body decoherence dynamics and optimized oper- ation of a single-photon switch”. New Journal of Physics18, 092001 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Certification of high-dimensional entanglement and einstein- 8 podolsky-rosen steering with cold atomic quan- tum memory

    Michał Dąbrowski, Mateusz Mazelanik, Michał Parniak, Adam Leszczyński, Michał Lipka, and Wojciech Wasilewski. “Certification of high-dimensional entanglement and einstein- 8 podolsky-rosen steering with cold atomic quan- tum memory”. Phys. Rev. A98, 042126 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Long-distance quantum communica- tion with atomic ensembles and linear optics

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller. “Long-distance quantum communica- tion with atomic ensembles and linear optics”. Nature414, 413–418 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    Multicell atomic quan- tum memory as a hardware-efficient quantum re- peater node

    C. Li, S. Zhang, Y.-K. Wu, N. Jiang, Y.-F. Pu, and L.-M. Duan. “Multicell atomic quan- tum memory as a hardware-efficient quantum re- peater node”. PRX Quantum2, 040307 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Precision spectral manipulation of optical pulses using a coherent photon echo memory

    B. C. Buchler, M. Hosseini, G. Hétet, B. M. Sparkes, and P. K. Lam. “Precision spectral manipulation of optical pulses using a coherent photon echo memory”. Opt. Lett.35, 1091– 1093 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Gradient echo memory in an ultra-high optical depth cold atomic ensemble

    B M Sparkes, J Bernu, M Hosseini, J Geng, Q Glorieux, P A Altin, P K Lam, N P Robins, and B C Buchler. “Gradient echo memory in an ultra-high optical depth cold atomic ensemble”. New Journal of Physics15, 085027 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    High efficiency co- herent optical memory with warm rubidium vapour

    M. Hosseini, B. M. Sparkes, G. Campbell, P. K. Lam, and B. C. Buchler. “High efficiency co- herent optical memory with warm rubidium vapour”. Nature Communications2, 174 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Spatial-mode storage in a gradient- echo memory

    D. B. Higginbottom, B. M. Sparkes, M. Rancic, O. Pinel, M. Hosseini, P. K. Lam, and B. C. Buchler. “Spatial-mode storage in a gradient- echo memory”. Phys. Rev. A86, 023801 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Entanglement distribution with wavevector-multiplexed quantum memory

    Michał Lipka, Mateusz Mazelanik, and Michał Parniak. “Entanglement distribution with wavevector-multiplexed quantum memory”. New Journal of Physics23, 053012 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Wavevector multi- plexed atomic quantum memory via spatially- resolved single-photon detection

    Michał Parniak, Michał Dąbrowski, Mateusz Mazelanik, Adam Leszczyński, Michał Lipka, and Wojciech Wasilewski. “Wavevector multi- plexed atomic quantum memory via spatially- resolved single-photon detection”. Nature Com- munications8, 2140 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Spatial spin-wave modulator for quantum- memory-assisted adaptive measurements

    MichałLipka, AdamLeszczyński, MateuszMaze- lanik, Michał Parniak, and Wojciech Wasilewski. “Spatial spin-wave modulator for quantum- memory-assisted adaptive measurements”. Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 034049 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Quantum optics of spin waves through ac stark modulation

    Michał Parniak, Mateusz Mazelanik, Adam Leszczyński, Michał Lipka, Michał Dąbrowski, and Wojciech Wasilewski. “Quantum optics of spin waves through ac stark modulation”. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 063604 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Optical-domain spectral super- resolution via a quantum-memory-based time- frequency processor

    Mateusz Mazelanik, Adam Leszczyński, and Michał Parniak. “Optical-domain spectral super- resolution via a quantum-memory-based time- frequency processor”. Nature Communications 13, 691 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Spectrum- to-position mapping via programmable spatial dispersion implemented in an optical quantum memory

    Marcin Jastrzębski, Stanisław Kurzyna, Bar- tosz Niewelt, Mateusz Mazelanik, Wojciech Wasilewski, and Michał Parniak. “Spectrum- to-position mapping via programmable spatial dispersion implemented in an optical quantum memory”. Phys. Rev. A109, 012418 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Exper- imental implementation of the optical fractional fourier transform in the time-frequency domain

    Bartosz Niewelt, Marcin Jastrzębski, Stanisław Kurzyna, Jan Nowosielski, Wojciech Wasilewski, MateuszMazelanik, andMichałParniak. “Exper- imental implementation of the optical fractional fourier transform in the time-frequency domain”. Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 240801 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Photonic time-frequency fourier transform and temporal double slit using quantum-compatible atomic memory

    Ankit Papneja, Jesse Everett, Cameron Trainor, AaronD.Tranter, andBenC.Buchler. “Photonic time-frequency fourier transform and temporal double slit using quantum-compatible atomic memory”. Optica Quantum4, 162–168 (2026)

    2026

  37. [45]

    Hybrid quantum memory leveraging slow light and gra- dient echo duality

    Stanisław Kurzyna, Mateusz Mazelanik, Woj- ciech Wasilewski, and Michał Parniak. “Hybrid quantum memory leveraging slow light and gra- dient echo duality”. Phys. Rev. A (2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    Coherence enhancement of rydberg polaritons

    Xiao-Feng Shi, Yan Lu, Yuechun Jiao, and Jian- ming Zhao. “Coherence enhancement of rydberg polaritons”. Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044028 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Quantum memory with strong and controllable rydberg-level interac- tions

    Lin Li and A. Kuzmich. “Quantum memory with strong and controllable rydberg-level interac- tions”. Nature Communications7, 13618 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Long-lived coherence between ground and rydberg levels in a magic-wavelength lattice

    J. Lampen, H. Nguyen, L. Li, P. R. Berman, and A. Kuzmich. “Long-lived coherence between ground and rydberg levels in a magic-wavelength lattice”. Phys. Rev. A98, 033411 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Long-lived collective Rydberg excita- tions in atomic gas achieved via ac-Stark lattice modulation

    Stanisław Kurzyna, Bartosz Niewelt, Mateusz Mazelanik, Wojciech Wasilewski, and Michał Parniak. “Long-lived collective Rydberg excita- tions in atomic gas achieved via ac-Stark lattice modulation”. Quantum8, 1431 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Suppression of motional dephasing using state mapping

    Yuechun Jiao, Changcheng Li, Xiao-Feng Shi, Jiabei Fan, Jingxu Bai, Suotang Jia, Jianming Zhao, and C. Stuart Adams. “Suppression of motional dephasing using state mapping”. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053604 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Dynamical zeroing of spin-wave mo- mentum to suppress motional dephasing in an atomic-ensemble quantum memory

    Yan Jiang, Jun Rui, Xiao-Hui Bao, and Jian- Wei Pan. “Dynamical zeroing of spin-wave mo- mentum to suppress motional dephasing in an atomic-ensemble quantum memory”. Phys. Rev. A93, 063819 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Microwave-field quantum metrology with inherent robustness against detection losses enabled by rydberg interactions

    Stanisław Kurzyna, Bartosz Niewelt, Ma- teusz Mazelanik, Wojciech Wasilewski, Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański, and Michał Par- niak. “Microwave-field quantum metrology with inherent robustness against detection losses enabled by rydberg interactions” (2025). arXiv:2505.01506

    2025

  45. [53]

    Doppler-free rydberg spectroscopy in a warm vapor

    Jeremy Glick, Brielle E. Anderson, T. Nathan Nunley, Josiah Bingaman, Jian Jun Liu, David H. Meyer, and Paul Kunz. “Doppler-free rydberg spectroscopy in a warm vapor”. Phys. Rev. A112, 063726 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Three-photon rydberg-atom-based 9 radio-frequency sensing scheme with narrow linewidth

    Stephanie M. Bohaichuk, Fabian Ripka, Vi- jin Venu, Florian Christaller, Chang Liu, Matthias Schmidt, Harald Kübler, and James P. Shaffer. “Three-photon rydberg-atom-based 9 radio-frequency sensing scheme with narrow linewidth”. Phys. Rev. Appl.20, L061004 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Continuous protection of a collective state from inhomogeneous dephasing

    R. Finkelstein, O. Lahad, I. Cohen, O. David- son, S. Kiriati, E. Poem, and O. Firstenberg. “Continuous protection of a collective state from inhomogeneous dephasing”. Phys. Rev. X11, 011008 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Coherent optical pulse sequencer for quantum applications

    Mahdi Hosseini, Ben M. Sparkes, Gabriel Hétet, Jevon J. Longdell, Ping Koy Lam, and Ben C. Buchler. “Coherent optical pulse sequencer for quantum applications”. Nature461, 241– 245 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    Imaging a chain of strongly cor- related rydberg excitations enabled by förster- resonance-enhanced interaction

    Jinjin Du, Thibault Vogt, Ningxuan Zheng, and Wenhui Li. “Imaging a chain of strongly cor- related rydberg excitations enabled by förster- resonance-enhanced interaction”. Optica12, 1213–1219 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Experimental and simulated readout of interacting Rydberg spinwaves in a gradient echo memory

    Bartosz Niewelt, Stanisław Kurzyna, Bartosz Kasza, Wojciech Wasilewski, and Michał Par- niak. “Experimental and simulated readout of interacting Rydberg spinwaves in a gradient echo memory”. Dane Badawcze UW (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms

    N. Šibalić, J.D. Pritchard, C.S. Adams, and K.J. Weatherill. “Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms”. Computer Physics Communications220, 319– 331 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Xmds2: Fast, scalable sim- ulation of coupled stochastic partial differential equations

    Graham R. Dennis, Joseph J. Hope, and Mat- tias T. Johnsson. “Xmds2: Fast, scalable sim- ulation of coupled stochastic partial differential equations”. Computer Physics Communications 184, 201–208 (2013). 10 A Atom-light interface To model the system, we utilize an atomic semi...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.