Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review

As of 4 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.22553.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.22553 v1

Coverage vector

measured 33 of 33 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z

measured 33 of 33 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-04T06:34:03.388597+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

33 of 33 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved33
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation f48863e8-3143-4857-9f7e-40e151e536bf · outbound

This paper cites A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.048263Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.048263Z digest=sha256:2232eebf814c8d8968293d3383345dcb80072ff7c842b0e9813dae7281e47713

Observation 8f031eb2-307d-425d-8850-2a5c4e9f06a6 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , url =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , url =

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.100131Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.100131Z digest=sha256:990a506f8e656c74b2e55953d2aa23cd3aa84cde993ce7e35db033122a696c0a

Observation 142b4344-ea87-4db5-9895-281df0fc8285 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , doi =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , doi =

Reference 3

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.173000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.173000Z digest=sha256:c40a8721dcecb9bbcdd3bfc9b77d3fe49401660a81b2df6c3179e0ee29c14381

Observation d000ce06-1f1e-4ca6-ae73-d299b2e176d8 · outbound

This paper cites 2024 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2024 , eprint =

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.246499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.246499Z digest=sha256:2f11d87594fd573ccdb3c7c4c21cc529b527d758088fb3bea1932ed165dd1d3c

Observation 8fe7d292-aed9-4275-bbce-4ee7dd587fd0 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of INLG 2020 , year =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of INLG 2020 , year =

Reference 5

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.356517Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.356517Z digest=sha256:48185fe6f72d4b8504e5a3d66ca0ea4dbe73ba9d8cb1185d3d572c9569e76b1a

Observation 3018704f-ac7b-4341-bf94-43cfff9beb78 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume =

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.488513Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.488513Z digest=sha256:64cc3fd40aecfb5fc22c8c7967ac7f9e31a3abd03e5481fb738080e137834c6a

Observation d4e37bbc-0a91-401c-bd01-968de156f989 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.604970Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.604970Z digest=sha256:c37ce46d36145ebedd2541f0e1466675f6a843c01c8f5a53ed5e1ed7a9f13203

Observation 1c323fdc-4d56-4d2f-b978-4eccca9bea24 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint =

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.715276Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.715276Z digest=sha256:21952224c91aa5c45a40d9331b9ce53f3eb3e93986eed38aff45d9fccf655368

Observation 6592163d-c79c-4f60-a397-d83a752ebca6 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of ACL 2025 (Long Papers) , year =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of ACL 2025 (Long Papers) , year =

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.848020Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.848020Z digest=sha256:a7b59a8c653d63b84d7e90b75e42ef560da0d67e75a243352634e0b98ddf09e0

Observation 921c3332-43f9-4db5-a634-5ebfd92cc4f1 · outbound

This paper cites Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.956460Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.956460Z digest=sha256:81b070b6fa3cd7fed7dd0862337c9d634a72972ecf4687b818ee50d021528dd8

Observation 184d1fc7-0313-427e-8e8e-cba0e47348c9 · outbound

This paper cites Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.030239Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.030239Z digest=sha256:e7c983417f835be9a063ae1746f8fb5ee11986bcce08d2296275ac519069dde4

Observation 221a042e-b85b-498a-bd5a-d54ff826dd97 · outbound

This paper cites NEJM AI , volume =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review NEJM AI , volume =

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.103844Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.103844Z digest=sha256:3eec55b77c6814f730aba77e7efbed3d422a41aa94e29b431126738ee0aff186

Observation 60f712bd-1bf0-4c8b-bd84-204fb1668612 · outbound

This paper cites AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.204073Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.204073Z digest=sha256:a6922a9dc8ee6a71085aa650068230e3e912b345bcf1b77d6b58c5b530b9b606

Observation 218d4d5e-2256-4175-8c93-5309df1970e6 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , eprint =

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.302769Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.302769Z digest=sha256:4c0751dd10a2dc9ddc09827f7a05eb48524f928c1626cc97a99d43c561648425

Observation 3320b049-02ff-40a7-9178-92aed793b4dc · outbound

This paper cites Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.403675Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.403675Z digest=sha256:eae70434aefa1b936faae2add62e2dd97a6e636ea26e3dd4daa9361f0688d326

Observation 3d4faac9-018d-42c0-91ee-68dcf3821c15 · outbound

This paper cites Scientometrics , volume=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Scientometrics , volume=

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.497340Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.497340Z digest=sha256:b912cbdd77007e09bf43aed7e3eab84d324738cbc64f28b34cefd81d0b96f4c7

Observation 06b8d714-d5f1-40f4-aabe-b65160d11e62 · outbound

This paper cites ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.592032Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.592032Z digest=sha256:95a785d39216ef810a29242a4cc198ec6f6fd6515c42aa557cb116680ceee377

Observation 7b2e4ab8-f058-4f91-b414-8188302a566a · outbound

This paper cites GPT-4 Technical Report.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review GPT-4 Technical Report

Reference 18

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.689782Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.689782Z digest=sha256:0e9123ef6c67f7cadf20d20f8f550abbc330a1f070eaa85661bb6d262bfc76a9

Observation b8fdf81d-baff-413d-9ea8-afd54faf37b0 · outbound

This paper cites 2020 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2020 , eprint=

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.768931Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.768931Z digest=sha256:391468d65c9099e1b8467e6d747c54993b7dc0e4b462e828e180ec5e8ae17f77

Observation cdc0819f-9030-43a4-8419-1b7e6bfce616 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.852005Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.852005Z digest=sha256:b89328fb0097b47479dc693cdff39ea038be6ec29d2abcfeb8d5a6058deb286f

Observation 4c517e97-f21a-402e-ac1a-b67584e792b6 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 21

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.950203Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.950203Z digest=sha256:b162dc4b29b2b8b094fe9e20a33ea727b14c8fa4f7fee02a3fa6fcebd1c0d554

Observation 88a74259-182e-4420-b07e-1871cc35b76d · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =

Reference 22

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.017291Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.017291Z digest=sha256:706e7e8ca448204973ba53dd0fe8aaff784596ccc31e8db4c6920b814d0844f2

Observation 510e1560-dec0-4b0c-b852-900e5606af50 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.084455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.084455Z digest=sha256:e583ea4fc0819a98038344fe60e7acac948682f2c0b50875a73bed00214477c5

Observation 424146ee-b0ea-4c87-8e86-7d4c02411234 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 24

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.160767Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.160767Z digest=sha256:db9fe89371eeda2590800d21369e730a4bfe80add2b2adf7a2def1f3e92f15c9

Observation d4621ba5-f5ea-463d-a14e-b00a277bb5b8 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work , articleno =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work , articleno =

Reference 25

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.227216Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.227216Z digest=sha256:bd0885af77e95a152fe216d4161ce0341befc69c46c010e58f060655346c118e

Observation c0fe434d-bc41-4d11-b1ff-6cbb50c66a9e · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 26

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.337936Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.337936Z digest=sha256:4af72153d0fa8d000284a22233073b7dd7cbc360cf93acb8d4b1f74df2a14308

Observation d4f0ced2-e864-4036-85ec-333106b71273 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 27

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.405857Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.405857Z digest=sha256:0ad2e24c4ae8ef6ce80a82413f63267202fc95ff14ea80da065a838bc097eada

Observation c0e69f67-88a1-467f-a933-919543d11566 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 28

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.469618Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.469618Z digest=sha256:40fb65f7425fee11e5323224067ad65b1f91b17cc300fa3a27e25e602698f277

Observation 1c0740d2-13e7-4bd7-8d6d-f73de55bf546 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 29

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.542924Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.542924Z digest=sha256:d77f0fb3604e3d1c655dc6b8394b1d26c679bc406840efeb3c499da2f031f338

Observation 367ddb12-929c-48f7-92c4-84ee8da3871d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.610284Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.610284Z digest=sha256:2cec3ef25e0c7fb9ef474aabaae49372c7e5f06303ef32d4844d3bc541752fa5

Observation 201d7f7a-574f-4cd3-bbbe-0f76523a25db · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.701399Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.701399Z digest=sha256:1bf2ec483f2ed08823cb71efa2db9a771708e45e017a4c1058a1df8afd885b0c

Observation 88dd7e9c-e8f5-4d27-87fb-53f7422f6697 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , journal =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , journal =

Reference 32

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.786083Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.786083Z digest=sha256:609946d4f57715cbbaf763c4adacea02b9867e0d5c6071593d5a4ef8fed21748

Observation fe10538f-a9ed-4cf3-920f-0a37c91fbd55 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen3 Technical Report.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Qwen3 Technical Report

Reference 33

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z digest=sha256:b9447aa7fc8d163d1527dc4c2df1f4c3d3ae4112413ac1b9afefeba41480f20e

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.