Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 8 minor 27 references

Fe-doping-induced band structure modification and cryogenic phase stability in Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals

T0 review · 5 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fe doping of Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals narrows the high-temperature band gap and damps cryogenic phase-transition strain.

desk verdict Real single-crystal trends under a better growth recipe, but the dual-function claim outruns unmeasured Fe occupancy and STE-only optics. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23456 v1 pith:D2OG4KM6 submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yanan Li , Xuejiao Wu , Jidong Deng , Jinbao Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 61.50.Ks78.55.-m61.72.U81.10.Dn
keywords Cs2AgBiBr6Fedopingdoubleperovskiteband-gapnarrowingphasetransitiontetragonalstrainphotoluminescencesinglecrystals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cs2AgBiBr6 is a lead-free double perovskite whose usefulness is limited by a wide band gap and by a structural transition near 125 K that can introduce lattice strain. This work grows high-quality single crystals with nominal half-substitution of Bi by Fe and shows that the same dopant does two things at once. Above the transition it red-shifts the photoluminescence, indicating a narrower gap; below the transition it reduces tetragonal strain and eliminates the transient PL peak splitting seen in the undoped crystal. The authors therefore present Fe incorporation, enabled by a modified hydrothermal growth protocol, as a practical route to a more stable, lower-gap material for low-temperature optoelectronics and spintronics.

What carries the argument

Site-selective Fe occupancy on the Bi site (preferentially along the c-axis in the I4/m phase), which contracts the lattice, reverses the Bi/Fe–Br bond-length inequality relative to the pristine crystal, and lowers the absolute tetragonal strain parameter |σ|.

What would settle it

A direct compositional assay (e.g., ICP or EDS) confirming actual Fe occupancy near 50 %, combined with thermal-cycling strain or device-level measurements that either reproduce or fail to show the claimed stability gain across the 125 K transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Nominal 50 % Fe-for-Bi substitution in Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals simultaneously narrows the optical gap in the cubic phase above ~125 K and suppresses the strain and spectral disorder that accompany the cubic-to-tetragonal transition below that temperature, without destroying the host structure or the transition itself.

Load-bearing premise

The small drop in tetragonal strain and the cleaner low-temperature PL lineshape are taken as sufficient proof that the phase-transition instability has been meaningfully suppressed for real devices.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fe-doped CABB single crystals become a more practical platform for cryogenic optoelectronic and spintronic devices that must survive repeated passage through 125 K.
  • Band-gap tuning in the cubic phase can be achieved without destroying the double-perovskite framework or introducing a new structural distortion.
  • The same modified hydrothermal protocol may be transferable to other B-site dopants that target both electronic and strain properties.
  • Low-temperature X-ray detectors or spin-based sensors could exploit the reduced non-radiative pathways relative to earlier doped films while retaining structural robustness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the modest |σ| reduction truly tracks lower defect density, Fe doping may also lengthen carrier diffusion lengths enough to reopen thin-film photovoltaic interest despite the added non-radiative centers.
  • The preferential c-axis Fe alignment suggests a possible magnetically ordered ground state at still lower temperature that the present optical and XRD data do not probe.
  • The same growth protocol could be used to test whether other transition-metal substituents produce analogous dual electronic–structural benefits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports hydrothermal growth of pristine and nominally 50% Fe-substituted Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals and characterizes them by temperature-dependent single-crystal X-ray diffraction (100–225 K), steady-state and time-resolved photoluminescence (80–300 K), and near-room-temperature Raman spectroscopy. Both compositions undergo the known cubic (Fm-3m) to tetragonal (I4/m) transition near 125 K. The authors claim a dual function for Fe: (i) above Ts, a red-shifted PL peak is interpreted as band-gap narrowing, attributed to Fe-3d intermediate-band states; (ii) below Ts, a slightly smaller tetragonal strain parameter |σ| (0.3416 vs 0.3464 at 100 K), a reversal of the Bi/Fe–Br1 vs Bi/Fe–Br2 bond-length inequality, narrower PL linewidth, and the absence of the transient three-peak PL splitting seen in the pristine crystal are interpreted as suppression of detrimental phase-transition strain and antisite defects. The data are internally consistent across techniques in locating the ~125 K anomaly and in showing systematic differences between the two crystals. However, the central claims rest on a Fe content that is never measured, on a bond-length 'shortening' that Table I does not show, and on a gap-narrowing inference drawn from self-trapped-exciton PL without any absorption measurement.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result is of genuine interest to the halide double-perovskite community: a dopant that simultaneously tunes the optical response in the cubic phase and reduces tetragonal strain through the 125 K transition would be a useful design handle for lead-free optoelectronics operating over wide temperature ranges. The study's strengths are the temperature-resolved, single-crystal (not thin-film) characterization: SC-XRD at six temperatures on both compositions, steady-state PL from 80–300 K with lineshape analysis, tri-exponential TRPL, and supporting Raman — a self-consistent dataset in which the 125 K anomaly appears independently in c-axis, PL intensity/peak/FWHM, and τ2. The synthesis protocol is described in sufficient detail to be reproducible. The paper is, however, observational rather than mechanistic: the load-bearing interpretive steps (actual Fe content, gap narrowing vs. new emission channel, antisite suppression) currently rest on inference rather than direct measurement.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.2.2, Table I, Methods] The entire dual-function interpretation rests on the composition Cs2AgBi0.5Fe0.5Br6, i.e., 50% Bi→Fe replacement, but Fe content is never measured. There is no EDS, ICP-OES, or XPS, and — most importantly — no site-occupancy refinement of the SC-XRD data, even though Bi (Z=83) and Fe (Z=26) have very large X-ray scattering contrast, making an occupancy/refinement test essentially free on data already in hand. The only evidence offered for incorporation is a systematic c-axis contraction (Fig. 2), which is consistent with Fe doping but equally consistent with modest off-stoichiometry, vacancy disorder, or sample-to-sample variation. At minimum, the authors should (i) refine the Bi/Fe site occupancy at 100 K and 225 K and report the refined Fe fraction with esds, and (ii) provide an independent composition assay. If the refined/assayed Fe fraction is far below 50%, the stoichiometric formu
  2. [§2.2.2, Table I] The text claims a 'concomitant shortening of the average Bi/Fe–Br bond distance' as confirmation of Fe incorporation, but Table I shows the opposite of a statistically meaningful effect: the doped sample's Bi/Fe–Br1/Br2 distances are 2.821/2.812 Å versus 2.813(5)/2.823(5) Å for pristine — the averages (2.8165 vs 2.818 Å) are indistinguishable within the quoted esds, and substituting half the B-sites with high-spin Fe3+ (0.645 Å vs 1.03 Å for Bi3+) should produce a clearly resolvable contraction of the average metal–halide bond. Relatedly, the much-discussed 'reversed inequality' d'(Bi/Fe–Br1) > d'(Bi/Fe–Br2) rests on a 0.009 Å difference against combined esds of ~0.006 Å — roughly a 1.5σ effect — and one entry carries an implausible esd of zero, '2.821(0)'. Either the bond-length discussion should be removed, or the authors must demonstrate with proper error propagation that the differen
  3. [§2.3.1–2.3.2, Fig. 4b] The claim that Fe 'narrows the band gap' in the cubic phase is inferred solely from a red-shift of the photoluminescence peak above Ts. In Cs2AgBiBr6 the emission is a strongly Stokes-shifted self-trapped-exciton band (as the authors themselves note, §2.3.3, citing [19,20]); its peak position tracks STE relaxation energetics and defect channels, not the band edge. The authors' own data supply an obvious competing explanation: Fe introduces non-radiative centers (10× integrated-intensity quench, Fig. 4a; 10× reduction of τ2, Fig. 6), so a new lower-energy Fe/defect emission channel would produce exactly the observed red-shift without any gap change. This is also the finding of ref. [14], which the authors cite for the DFT intermediate-band picture while disagreeing with its experimental conclusion; the disagreement is attributed to crystal quality without independent evidence. A temperatu
  4. [§2.2.2] Two structural-mechanistic claims exceed the data. (a) 'The equivalence of the Ag–Br bond lengths between the two samples confirms that Fe substitution occurs exclusively at the Bi site, thereby suppressing the formation of Ag–Bi anti-site defects': with esds of 0.004–0.006 Å, bond-length equivalence constrains nothing about antisite occupancy, which would require refinement of mixed Ag/Bi site occupancies or a probe such as solid-state NMR (cf. ref. [9], which the authors cite for antisites). (b) 'Fe preferentially occupying Bi sites along the c-axis' is asserted from the reversed Br1/Br2 inequality (see comment 2) and offered to explain the strain reduction; in the I4/m double-perovskite structure the B-site sublattice does not have crystallographically distinct 'along-c' Bi positions in the Fm-3m-derived model, so this needs either a refinement demonstrating anisotropic Fe distributio
  5. [§2.2.2, Table I, Fig. 2] The reduction in |σ| from 0.3464 to 0.3416 is reported without error bars. Propagating the lattice-parameter esds in Table I (a: 0.002–0.006 Å; c: 0.005–0.008 Å) gives an uncertainty on each σ of order 0.001, so the difference is only marginally significant (~3σ under generous assumptions, less if the larger esds apply to both), and no information is given on whether the two crystals were measured on the same instrument/run protocol or whether the result is reproducible across multiple crystals. Since the strain reduction is the quantitative core of the 'cryogenic stability' claim, the authors should report σ with propagated uncertainties, state the number of crystals measured, and ideally show the full σ(T) curve from 100–125 K rather than a single 100 K point, especially given that the PL 'transient splitting' it is meant to explain occurs over 90–125 K.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Methods, §2.2.1] Methods state data were collected at 'a steady temperature of 99 K' while the text and Table I refer to 100 K; please reconcile. Also, 'Crystals refinement software' (§2.2.1 and Methods) presumably means CrysAlisPro; please use the correct product name.
  2. [Table I] Table I, Bi/Fe–Br1 entry '2.821(0)': an esd of exactly zero is not credible for a refined bond length; presumably a rounding or transcription error.
  3. [Fig. 1] Figure 1 is described in its caption as a 'phase diagram'; it is a furnace temperature program, not a phase diagram. Please relabel.
  4. [§2.3.4, Fig. 6] τ2 is described as the 'long-lived' component, yet three components τ1 < τ2 < τ3 (or some ordering) are fitted and the ordering is never stated explicitly; please give the typical magnitude and ordering of the three lifetimes and clarify why the intermediate component, rather than τ3, carries the radiative STE assignment.
  5. [Abstract, Conclusion] The abstract and Conclusion state that optical and X-ray studies 'establish' Fe doping and a narrowed gap; given the comments above, more cautious wording ('consistent with', 'indicates') is appropriate unless the additional measurements are provided.
  6. [§2.3.1, §2.3.3] The single-point 80 K anomaly in peak position and FWHM (Fig. 4b,c) is acknowledged as unexplained; since the multi-peak analysis (Fig. 5 insets) covers 90–125 K, please clarify whether the 80 K spectrum refits to a different component structure, which bears on the 'suppression of splitting' argument.
  7. [§2.3.4] The statement that τ2 of the Fe-doped sample 'remains comparable to, or even exceeds, the values reported in the literature' is vague; please give a numerical comparison with the cited works [2, 9, 23].
  8. [References] Reference [15] ('W. N. et al., Sci. Adv. 6, 262 (2020)') appears to have a malformed author list and possibly wrong page/article number; please check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: experimental comparison of pristine vs Fe-doped crystals; dual-function claim rests on independent SC-XRD/PL observables, not on self-defined or fitted quantities.

full rationale

This is a standard experimental materials paper. The load-bearing claims (cubic-phase PL red-shift interpreted as gap narrowing; smaller |σ|, reversed Bi/Fe–Br inequality, and suppressed PL peak splitting below Ts interpreted as strain suppression) are direct comparisons of newly measured lattice parameters, bond lengths, PL peak positions, FWHM, multi-peak fits, and TRPL lifetimes between two crystals. None of these observables is defined in terms of the dual-function conclusion, fitted from a subset and then re-predicted, or forced by a uniqueness theorem. The self-citation to the authors’ prior hydrothermal protocol [10] only describes the growth recipe; the dual-function result does not reduce to that citation. The external DFT/THG reference [14] is used only for mechanistic color (Fe-3d intermediate band), not to define or force the measured PL shift or strain values. Validity concerns (unassayed Fe occupancy, STE vs band-edge PL, tiny |σ| difference) are correctness/evidence-strength issues, not circularity. Derivation chain is self-contained against the paper’s own data; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Standard experimental condensed-matter paper. No new physical entities. Load-bearing background assumptions are conventional assignments (PL peak ≈ effective gap proxy, STE origin of long τ2, strain formula σ = 2(a−c)/(a+c), site occupancy from bond-length trends) plus the unverified nominal stoichiometry Cs2AgBi0.5Fe0.5Br6.

free parameters (3)
  • nominal Fe fraction x = 0.5 = 0.5 (nominal)
    Target Bi:Fe = 1:1 precursor ratio; actual lattice occupancy never assayed by EDS/ICP/XRF and is only inferred from average lattice contraction.
  • Gaussian / multi-Gaussian PL peak parameters
    Peak position, FWHM and integrated intensity used for all doping comparisons are obtained from Gaussian fits; number of components (2 vs 3) is chosen by eye below Ts.
  • tri-exponential TRPL lifetimes τ1,τ2,τ3
    Decay curves forced to three exponentials; only τ2 is interpreted as intrinsic STE; amplitudes and exact partitioning are fit parameters.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PL peak energy is a reliable proxy for effective band-gap narrowing caused by Fe-3d intermediate bands
    Used throughout §2.3; mechanism taken from external DFT in ref. [14] rather than measured absorption or the authors’ own electronic-structure calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Tetragonal strain σ = 2(a−c)/(a+c) quantifies ‘detrimental’ structural instability relevant to device cycling
    Introduced in §2.2.2; a ~1.4 % relative change in |σ| is taken as evidence that Fe ‘suppresses’ cryogenic instability without fatigue or device data.
  • domain assumption Long TRPL component τ2 is bulk self-trapped-exciton recombination; τ1 and τ3 are defect-related
    Standard assignment in the double-perovskite literature, adopted in §2.3.4 to claim crystal quality remains competitive after doping.
  • domain assumption Equality of Ag–Br bond lengths implies Fe substitutes exclusively on Bi sites and thereby suppresses AgBi/BiAg antisites
    §2.2.2 structural discussion; plausible but not independently verified by local probes (NMR, EXAFS, etc.).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fe-doping-induced band structure modification and cryogenic phase stability in Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D2OG4KM6

@misc{pith2026260723456,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fe-doping-induced band structure modification and cryogenic phase stability in Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D2OG4KM6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23456}
}
read the original abstract

Despite its promise as a lead-free alternative, the practical application of Cs2AgBiBr6 in optoelectronics is limited by its wide band gap and detrimental intrinsic defects. To overcome these challenges, we synthesized Cs2AgBi0.5Fe0.5Br6 single crystals via a modified hydrothermal method. While both pristine and Fe-doped crystals undergo a structural phase transition near 125 K, Fe incorporation fundamentally alters its impact. The dopant simultaneously narrows the band gap in the high-temperature phase and suppresses the associated cryogenic structural instability. Our optical and X-ray structural studies establish Fe doping as a powerful strategy for tailoring the properties of Cs2AgBiBr6 , advancing its potential for high-performance, low-temperature optoelectronic and spintronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23456 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Phase diagram illustrating the synthesis conditions for single crystal growth of Cs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the c-axis lattice parameter obtained from single-crystal X-ray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature-dependent steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra of (a) pristine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of the PL spectra analysis for (a) integrated peak intensity, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The striking transient peak splitting was observed in the pristine sample immediately below the phase transition (90–125 K), shown in Figure 5a, which vanished upon further cooling to 80 K. This feature was entirely absent in the Fe-doped sample (Figure 5b). We attribu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Multi-peak Gaussian fitting of the PL spectra at 100 K for (a) Cs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temperature-dependent lifetimes ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a, b) Temperature-dependent Raman spectra near room temperature for (a) Cs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references

  1. [14]

    B. A. Rosales, L. Men, S. D. Cady, M. P. Hanrahan, A. J. Rossini, and J. Vela, Chem. Mater. 28, 6848 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    Keshavarz, E

    M. Keshavarz, E. Debroye, M. Ottesen, C. Martin, H. Zhang, E. Fron, R. K¨ uchler, J. A. Steele, M. Bremholm, J. V. Vondel, H. I. Wang, M. Bonn, M. B. J. Roeffaers, S. Wiedmann, and J. Hofkens, Adv. Mater.32, 2001878 (2020)

    2020

  3. [1]

    INTRODUCTION The search for environmentally stable and lead-free perovskites has positioned the double perovskite Cs 2AgBiBr6 (CABB) as a promising candidate for optoelectronic applications [1–3]. However, its practical performance is fundamentally limited by a wide energy gap, which restricts its spectral response, and the presence of intrinsic point def...

    arXiv 2026

  4. [2]

    Crystal Synthesis To obtain high-quality single crystals, their growth was carefully optimized

    RESUL TS AND DISCUSSION 2.1. Crystal Synthesis To obtain high-quality single crystals, their growth was carefully optimized. While the initial synthesis followed our previous hydrothermal method [1, 10, 13], a key modification was introduced: a five-step furnace program (Figure 1, left). This protocol was designed to optimize crystal formation through con...

  5. [3]

    CONCLUSION This study establishes Fe doping as a powerful, dual-functional strategy for engineering lead-free double perovskite Cs 2AgBiBr6. We demonstrate that our Fe-doped crystals (nom- inal Cs 2AgBi0.5Fe0.5Br6) simultaneously suppress the intrinsic structural instability below the 125 K phase transition and reduce the band gap above it. Critically, Fe...

  6. [4]

    A. D. Wright, L. R. V. Buizza, K. J. Savill, G. Longo, H. J. Snaith, M. B. Johnston, and L. M. Herz, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 3352 (2021)

    2021

  7. [5]

    S. N. Rahane, G. K. Rahane, A. Mandal, Y. Jadhav, A. Godha, A. Rokade, S. Shah, Y. Hase, A. Waghmare, N. G. Saykar, A. Roy, K. N. Salgaonkar, D. Dubal, S. K. Makineni, N. Y. Dzade, S. R. Jadkar, and S. R. Rondiya, ACS Phys. Chem Au4, 476 (2024)

    2024

  8. [6]

    Ebadi, K

    F. Ebadi, K. Meraji, M. A. T. Cachafeiro, F. Wolf, M. T. Sirtl, T. Bein, and W. Tress, Adv. Energy Mater.15, 2500758 (2025)

    2025

Show all 27 references
  1. [7]

    F. K. Alshammari, A. Jebnouni, M. Bouzidi, S. B. Khalifa, and M. B. Bechir, J. Cryst. Growth 670, 128331 (2025)

    2025

  2. [8]

    Schade, A

    L. Schade, A. D. Wright, R. D. Johnson, M. Dollmann, B. Wenger, P. K. Nayak, D. Prab- hakaran, L. M. Herz, R. Nicholas, H. J. Snaith, and P. G. Radaelli, ACS Energy Lett.4, 299 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    E. T. McClure, M. R. Ball, W. Windl, and P. M. Woodward, Chem. Mater.28, 1348 (2016). 17

    2016

  4. [11]

    C. B. Simmons, A. J. Akey, J. P. Mailoa, D. Recht, M. J. Aziz, and T. Buonassisi, Adv. Funct. Mater.24, 2852 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    D. J. Kubicki, M. Saski, S. MacPherson, K. Galkowski, J. Lewi´ nski, D. Prochowicz, J. J. Titman, and S. D. Stranks, Chem. Mater.32, 8129 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Y. Li, L. Yang, X. Wu, J. Deng, and J. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C127, 16061 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Y. P. et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 4873–4878 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Li, X. Xia, Z. Wang, Z. Huang, B. Lei, and Y. Gao, Nat. Commun.13, 3397 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    G. Liu, Z. Zhang, C. Wu, Y. Zhang, X. Li, W. Yu, G. Yao, S. Liu, J. Shi, K. Liu, Z. Chen, L. Xiao, and B. Qu, Adv. Funct. Mater.32, 2109891 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    W. N. et al., Sci. Adv.6, 262 (2020)

    2020

  11. [20]

    W. Yu, Y. Zou, H. Wang, B. Qu, Z. Chen, and L. Xiao, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 5310 (2023)

    2023

  12. [21]

    Demazeau and A

    G. Demazeau and A. Largeteau, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.641, 159 (2015)

    2015

  13. [22]

    S. Li, J. Luo, J. Liu, and J. Tang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 1999 (2019)

    1999

  14. [23]

    B. Ke, R. Zeng, Z. Zhao, Q. Wei, X. Xue, K. Bai, C. Cai, W. Zhou, Z. Xia, and B. Zou, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 340 (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    A. H. Slavney, T. Hu, A. M. Lindenberg, and H. I. Karunadasa, J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 2138 (2016)

    2016

  16. [25]

    S. J. Zelewski, J. M. Urban, A. Surrente, D. K. Maude, A. Kuc, L. Schade, R. D. John- son, M. Dollmann, P. K. Nayak, H. J. Snaith, P. Radaelli, R. Kudrawiec, R. J. Nicholas, P. Plochocka, and M. Baranowski, J. Mater. Chem. C7, 8350 (2019)

    2019

  17. [26]

    Thawarkar, S

    S. Thawarkar, S. R. Rondiya, N. Y. Dzade, N. Khupse, and S. Jadkar, Chem. Eur. J.27, 7408 (2021)

    2021

  18. [27]

    J. A. Steele, P. Puech, M. Keshavarz, R. Yang, S. Banerjee, E. Debroye, C. W. Kim, H. Yuan, N. H. Heo, J. Vanacken, A. Walsh, J. Hofkens, and M. B. J. Roeffaers, ACS Nano12, 8081 (2018). 18

    2018

  19. [28]

    Pistor, M

    P. Pistor, M. Meyns, M. Guc, H.-C. Wang, M. A. L. Marques, X. Alcob´ e, A. Cabot, and V. Izquierdo-Roca, Scr. Mater.184, 24 (2020). 19

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.