Dynamical control of particle jets from a driven condensate in a one-dimensional lattice with double-well potential

L. Q. Lai; Z. Li

Dynamical control of particle jets from a driven condensate in a one-dimensional lattice with double-well potential

T0 review · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Moderate well-depth bias speeds up resonant particle jets from a driven Bose condensate; large bias or hopping imbalance slows them down.

desk verdict Clean incremental parameter study: moderate well bias and hopping imbalance give real control knobs over already-known resonant jets, inside a solid but narrow mean-field U=0 model. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23533 v1 pith:4KVTLGJN submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

Z. Li , L. Q. Lai This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

keywords Bose-Einsteincondensateone-dimensionallatticedouble-wellpotentialperiodicdrivingparticlejetsdepthasymmetryhoppingimbalanceatomtronics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows how to steer collective particle jets leaving a Bose-Einstein condensate held in a double-well site of a one-dimensional lattice. When the interactions are driven at the right frequency, atoms are pumped from the stable ground mode into an unstable excited mode and then stream out along the lattice leads. In a perfectly symmetric well the emission window is set by a clear competition between drive strength and hopping. Introducing a moderate depth difference between the two wells improves the resonance and raises the emission rate; a large depth difference detunes the system and suppresses the jets. Unequal hopping to the two leads further weakens or redirects the outflow. The authors argue that these knobs give concrete control over many-body transport and could guide the design of atomtronic devices that source directed matter-wave beams.

What carries the argument

Mean-field equations for the lattice amplitudes closed by a frequency-domain Green’s function of the leads, reduced via a two-mode ansatz and multiple-scale analysis to slow equations for the symmetric and antisymmetric amplitudes whose instability threshold is set by drive strength versus lead-induced damping.

What would settle it

Prepare a driven double-well condensate at the stated resonance, scan well-depth difference from zero through moderate to large values at fixed drive, and check whether the measured central-site decay rate first rises then falls exactly as predicted; a monotonic or absent peak falsifies the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under resonant modulation of the interaction, a Bose condensate in a lattice double well emits collective particle jets whose rate is tunable by geometry: moderate depth asymmetry enhances emission by hybridizing the symmetric and antisymmetric modes closer to resonance, while large asymmetry or finite hopping imbalance suppresses or redirects the jets.

Load-bearing premise

Replacing the quantum operators by ordinary numbers and setting the static interaction to zero still correctly describes the emission dynamics; any sizable static interaction can push the system into self-trapping and erase the claimed control window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Atomtronic sources can use a small intentional well tilt to boost jet brightness without raising drive power.
Large intentional tilt or hopping imbalance can serve as an off-switch that quenches unwanted emission.
Directionality of the jets can be steered by unequal hopping to the two leads.
The same resonance condition (drive frequency equal to twice the symmetric–antisymmetric splitting) remains the operating point when weak asymmetry is added.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the enhancement peak sits at moderate bias, real devices will need active stabilization of well depths to stay inside that window rather than drifting into the suppressed regime.
The same control map should apply to other driven bosonic junctions (e.g., ring or multi-well atomtronics) whenever a discrete mode pair couples to continuum leads.
Finite-temperature or quantum-fluctuation corrections that populate the antisymmetric mode before the drive is turned on would likely shrink the buildup time and shift the observed enhancement peak.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing worth knowing is that this is a controlled extension of the authors’ own resonant-jet work, not a new mechanism. They already had the symmetric double-well jets and the g-versus-J threshold; here they add depth bias ΔV and hopping imbalance ΔJ and show, numerically, that moderate bias (~0.4) speeds emission while large bias (~0.8) kills it, and that hopping imbalance can weaken or redirect the jets.

What they do well is the formal backbone. The Green-function stability windows (Eqs. 10–11) and the multiple-scale threshold (Eqs. 16–17) are derived cleanly and line up with the color maps in Figs. 2 and 4. The numerics for the asymmetric scans (Figs. 5–7) are internally consistent inside the model they chose. Self-citation is heavy but expected; they are building on their own baseline rather than reinventing it.

Soft spots are real but proportional. Everything sits on mean-field c-numbers plus U=0. Appendix A itself shows that U ≳ 1 already moves the stability windows and can produce self-trapping, so the claimed control knobs are fragile once interactions are realistic. No error bars, no finite-size or lead-length checks, no code, and the atomtronics payoff is a closing sentence rather than a concrete device proposal. None of that sinks the calculation; it just caps the claim.

This is for people already working on driven BECs, Josephson junctions in lattices, or atomtronic transport who want concrete knobs. A serious referee should see it. I would not bring it to a general reading group, and I am unlikely to cite it unless I am writing specifically on parametric emission control. Still, the math is honest and the parameter maps are useful within their stated regime. Send it to review.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: analytics are standard multiple-scale/Green’s-function derivations checked against independent ODE numerics; asymmetry claims are new parameter scans, not redefinitions of prior fits.

self citation load bearing [Sec. I, paragraph on prior studies]
"In the previous studies, we uncovered a variety of particle-emission phenomena in a parametrically driven Bose-Einstein condensate, including resonantly enhanced emission [36], drive-imbalance effects [37], interference-induced suppression of the emission [57] and intermittent jet formation [58], while mainly focusing on the symmetric lattice geometries with homogeneous hopping amplitudes."

Routine author self-citation establishing baseline symmetric phenomenology. Not load-bearing for the new asymmetric results: those follow from fresh numerical integration of Eqs. (2)–(5) with ΔV, ΔJ ≠ 0 and are not forced by the cited works. Included only as the sole minor self-reference; does not raise the score above 1.

full rationale

The paper’s derivation chain is self-contained. The frequency-domain Green’s function (App. B, Eq. B11) is obtained from the lead tight-binding resolvent; the symmetric/antisymmetric stability windows (Eqs. 10–11) follow by substituting the two-mode zeroth-order energies into that resolvent; the emission threshold Ω_as ≶ g χ² (Eqs. 16–17 / App. C) is a standard multiple-scale reduction of the driven two-mode system. All three are compared to direct integration of the mean-field ODEs (Figs. 2, 4), which constitutes an independent numerical check rather than a tautology. The central new claims—moderate depth asymmetry enhances emission while large asymmetry suppresses it, and hopping imbalance redirects jets (Sec. III.B, Figs. 5–7)—are obtained by scanning ΔV and ΔJ in the same ODEs; they are not fitted inputs renamed as predictions, nor forced by a uniqueness theorem. Self-citations [36,37,57,58] only supply the authors’ prior symmetric-lattice phenomenology as background; they are not used to forbid alternatives or to define the asymmetric observables. The U=0 and mean-field assumptions are stated limitations, not circular steps. Overall circularity is negligible (score 1 solely for routine self-reference that is not load-bearing).

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the mean-field Gross-Pitaevskii reduction, the two-mode truncation, the U=0 idealization, and an infinite-lead continuum bath. These are standard domain assumptions in the driven-BEC literature; no new particles or forces are postulated. Free parameters are the usual microscopic hoppings, well depths and drive amplitude, all chosen by hand to lie inside the analytically derived instability window.

free parameters (3)

drive strength g = 0.1–0.4 (Jh=1 units)
Chosen by hand (typical values 0.1–0.4) to sit inside or outside the parametric instability region; not fitted to external data.
hopping amplitudes J, Jb, Jc, Jl = Jl=1, J~0.1–0.3
Set by hand (Jl=1, J~0.1–0.3) to realize the desired stability windows; control the emission threshold.
well depths Vb, Vc (or ΔV) = V≈−2, |ΔV|≤0.8
Tuned by hand around V=−2 to satisfy |εs|>2Jl>|εas|; the asymmetry ΔV is the main control knob explored.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Mean-field replacement of bosonic operators by c-number amplitudes φμ,j
Invoked at the start of Sec. II to obtain the discrete Gross-Pitaevskii equations (2)–(5); standard for large-N condensates but uncontrolled for the low-density jets.
ad hoc to paper On-site interaction U set identically to zero
Stated in Sec. II and justified in Appendix A by noting that U≳1 already alters stability; simplifies analytics but restricts experimental relevance.
domain assumption Infinite-lead continuum with only nearest-neighbor hopping Jl and no interactions outside the wells
Built into Hamiltonian (1) and used to derive the frequency-domain Green function G11 (Appendix B).
domain assumption Two-mode truncation retaining only the local symmetric and antisymmetric modes
Used in Sec. III.A and Appendix C to obtain the analytic threshold Eqs. (16)–(17).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical control of particle jets from a driven condensate in a one-dimensional lattice with double-well potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4KVTLGJN

@misc{pith2026260723533,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical control of particle jets from a driven condensate in a one-dimensional lattice with double-well potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4KVTLGJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23533}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the nonlinear dynamics of a Bose-Einstein condensate trapped in a double-well potential of a one-dimensional lattice, where the interatomic interactions are periodically modulated in time. In the typical case of a symmetric double-well, we observe collective particle emission under resonant driving, where the excitation regimes are explicitly constrained by the interplay between the drive strength and the hopping amplitude. By introducing a depth asymmetry between the wells, we find that moderate bias specifically enhances the emission rate, while large asymmetry suppresses it. The particle jets can be further controlled by modulating the hopping amplitudes, where the emission is weakened for finite hopping imbalances. These results outline the roles of asymmetry and external driving in precisely manipulating quantum many-body transport, and may offer insights into the design of atomtronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23533 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Total particle number of the condensate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Number of excited particles ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Decay of the particle number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of the excited particle number under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Number of particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008). 8

2008
[2]

C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

2010
[3]

Gati and M

R. Gati and M. K. Oberthaler, A bosonic Josephson junc- tion, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.40, R61 (2007)

2007
[4]

G. J. Milburn, J. Corney, E. M. Wright, and D. F. Walls, Quantum dynamics of an atomic Bose-Einstein conden- sate in a double-well potential, Phys. Rev. A55, 4318 (1997)

1997
[5]

Ananikian and T

D. Ananikian and T. Bergeman, Gross-Pitaevskii equa- tion for Bose particles in a double-well potential: Two- mode models and beyond, Phys. Rev. A73, 013604 (2006)

2006
[6]

Giovanazzi, A

S. Giovanazzi, A. Smerzi, and S. Fantoni, Josephson Ef- fects in Dilute Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4521 (2000)

2000
[7]

Y. Shin, M. Saba, A. Schirotzek, T. A. Pasquini, A. E. Leanhardt, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Distillation of Bose-Einstein Condensates in a Double-Well Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 150401 (2004)

2004
[8]

Giovanazzi, J

S. Giovanazzi, J. Esteve, and M. K. Oberthaler, Effec- tive parameters for weakly coupled Bose-Einstein con- densates, New J. Phys.10, 045009 (2008)

2008

Show all 60 references

[9]

Juli´ a-D ´ ıaz, J

B. Juli´ a-D ´ ıaz, J. Martorell, M. Mel´ e-Messeguer, and A. Polls, Beyond standard two-mode dynamics in bosonic Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. A82, 063626 (2010)

2010
[10]

Y. Y. Qian, M. Gong, and C. W. Zhang, Quantum trans- port of bosonic cold atoms in double-well optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A84, 013608 (2011)

2011
[11]

Susanto, J

H. Susanto, J. Cuevas, and P. Kr¨ uger, Josephson tun- nelling of dark solitons in a double-well potential, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.44, 095003 (2011)

2011
[12]

Zhang, L.-B

D.-W. Zhang, L.-B. Fu, Z. D. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Josephson dynamics of a spin-orbit-coupled Bose- Einstein condensate in a double-well potential, Phys. Rev. A85, 043609 (2012)

2012
[13]

Zheng and Q

H.-L. Zheng and Q. Gu, Dynamics of Bose-Einstein con- densates in a one-dimensional optical lattice with double- well potential, Front. Phys.8, 375 (2013)

2013
[14]

J. P. Hou, X.-W. Luo, K. Sun, T. Bersano, V. Gokhroo, S. Mossman, P. Engels, and C. W. Zhang, Momentum- Space Josephson Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 120401 (2018)

2018
[15]

Ying and H.-B

Y.-J. Ying and H.-B. Li, Dynamics of Bose-Einstein con- densation in an asymmetric double-well potential, Acta Phys. Sin.72, 130303 (2023)

2023
[16]

Sicks and H

J. Sicks and H. Rieger, Double-well Bose-Hubbard model with nearest-neighbor and cavity-mediated long-range in- teractions, Phys. Rev. A109, 033317 (2024)

2024
[17]

D. A. Hamza and J. Chwede´ nczuk, Metrology us- ing atoms in an array of double-well potentials, arXiv:2507.11395

arXiv
[18]

Pitaevskii and S

L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Thermal vs Quantum De- coherence in Double Well Trapped Bose-Einstein Con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 180402 (2001)

2001
[19]

Y. Shin, M. Saba, T. A. Pasquini, W. Ketterle, D. E. Pritchard, and A. E. Leanhardt, Atom Interferometry with Bose-Einstein Condensates in a Double-Well Poten- tial, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 050405 (2004)

2004
[20]

Raghavan, A

S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S. R. Shenoy, Coherent oscillations between two weakly coupled Bose- Einstein condensates: Josephson effects,πoscillations, and macroscopic quantum self-trapping, Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999)

1999
[21]

A. N. Salgueiro, A.F.R. de Toledo Piza, G. B. Lemos, R. Drumond, M. C. Nemes, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Quantum dynamics of bosons in a double-well potential: Josephson oscillations, self-trapping and ultralong tunneling times, Eur. Phys. J. D44, 537 (2007)

2007
[22]

W. Wang, L. B. Fu, and X. X. Yi, Effect of decoher- ence on the dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates in a double-well potential, Phys. Rev. A75, 045601 (2007)

2007
[23]

S. K. Adhikari, Josephson oscillation and induced col- lapse in an attractive Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A72, 013619 (2005)

2005
[24]

M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, F. Piazza, D. M. Jezek, and A. Smerzi, Phase slips and vortex dynamics in Josephson oscillations between Bose-Einstein conden- sates, EPL109, 40005 (2015)

2015
[25]

Y. D. van Nieuwkerk, J. Schmiedmayer, and F. H. L. Essler, Josephson oscillations in split one-dimensional Bose gases, SciPost Phys.10, 090 (2021)

2021
[26]

Gillet, M

J. Gillet, M. A. Garcia-March, Th. Busch, and F. Sols, Tunneling, self-trapping, and manipulation of higher modes of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a double well, Phys. Rev. A89, 023614 (2014)

2014
[27]

Zibold, E

T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, C. Gross, and M. K. Oberthaler, Classical Bifurcation at the Transition from Rabi to Josephson Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 204101 (2010)

2010
[28]

R. Roy, B. Chakrabarti, and A. Trombettoni, Quantum dynamics of few dipolar bosons in a double-well potential, Eur. Phys. J. D76, 24 (2022)

2022
[29]

Smerzi, S

A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S. R. Shenoy, Quantum Coherent Atomic Tunneling between Two Trapped Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950 (1997)

1997
[30]

M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and D. M. Jezek, Phase slippage and self-trapping in a self-induced bosonic Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. A84, 035601 (2011)

2011
[31]

Albiez, R

M. Albiez, R. Gati, J. F?lling, S. Hunsmann, M. Cris- tiani, and M. K. Oberthaler, Direct Observation of Tun- neling and Nonlinear Self-Trapping in a Single Bosonic Josephson Junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010402 (2005)

2005
[32]

Z?llner, H.-D

S. Z?llner, H.-D. Meyer, and P. Schmelcher, Tunneling dynamics of a few bosons in a double well, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013621 (2008)

2008
[33]

Z?llner, H.-D

S. Z?llner, H.-D. Meyer, and P. Schmelcher, Few-Boson Dynamics in Double Wells: From Single-Atom to Cor- related Pair Tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 040401 (2008)

2008
[34]

Chatterjee, I

B. Chatterjee, I. Brouzos, S. Z?llner, and P. Schmelcher, Few-boson tunneling in a double well with spatially mod- ulated interaction, Phys. Rev. A82, 043619 (2010)

2010
[35]

Maraj, J.-B

M. Maraj, J.-B. Wang, J.-S. Pan, and W. Yi, Interaction- modulated tunneling dynamics in a mixture of Bose- Einstein condensates, Eur. Phys. J. D71, 300 (2017)

2017
[36]

L. Q. Lai, Y. B. Yu, and E. J. Mueller, Resonant enhance- ment of particle emission from a parametrically driven condensate in a one-dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033302 (2022)

2022
[37]

L. Q. Lai and Z. Li, Effects of drive imbalance on the particle emission from a Bose-Einstein condensate in a one-dimensional lattice, Chin. Phys. B33, 030308 (2024)

2024
[38]

F. S. Cataliotti, S. Burger, C. Fort, P. Maddaloni, F. Minardi, A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, and M. Inguscio, Josephson Junction Arrays with Bose-Einstein Conden- 9 sates, Science293, 843 (2001)

2001
[39]

Morsch and M

O. Morsch and M. Oberthaler, Dynamics of Bose- Einstein condensates in optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 179 (2006)

2006
[40]

S. I. Mistakidis, A. G. Volosniev, R. E. Barfknecht, T. Fogarty, Th. Busch, A. Foerster, P. Schmelcher, and N. T. Zinner, Few-body Bose gases in low dimensions—A laboratory for quantum dynamics, Phys. Rep.1042, 1 (2023)

2023
[41]

Schumm, S

T. Schumm, S. Hofferberth, L. M. Andersson, S. Wilder- muth, S. Groth, I. Bar-Joseph, J. Schmiedmayer, and P. Kr¨ uger, Matter-wave interferometry in a double well on an atom chip, Nat. Phys.1, 57 (2005)

2005
[42]

Theocharis, P

G. Theocharis, P. G. Kevrekidis, D. J. Frantzeskakis, and P. Schmelcher, Symmetry breaking in symmetric and asymmetric double-well potentials, Phys. Rev. E74, 056608 (2006)

2006
[43]

B. V. Hall, S. Whitlock, R. Anderson, P. Hannaford, and A. I. Sidorov, Condensate Splitting in an Asymmetric Double Well for Atom Chip Based Sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 030402 (2007)

2007
[44]

H. M. Cataldo and D. M. Jezek, Dynamics in asymmetric double-well condensates, Phys. Rev. A90, 043610 (2014)

2014
[45]

S. J. Kim, H. Yu, S. T. Gang, D. Z. Anderson, and J. B. Kim, Controllable asymmetric double well and ring po- tential on an atom chip, Phys. Rev. A93, 033612 (2016)

2016
[46]

Gavrilov and J

M. Gavrilov and J. Bechhoefer, Erasure without Work in an Asymmetric Double-Well Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 200601 (2016)

2016
[47]

J. G. Cosme, M. F. Andersen, and J. Brand, Interaction blockade for bosons in an asymmetric double well, Phys. Rev. A96, 013616 (2017)

2017
[48]

S. K. Haldar and O. E. Alon, Many-body quantum dy- namics of an asymmetric bosonic Josephson junction, New J. Phys.21, 103037 (2019)

2019
[49]

D. R. Lindberg, N. Gaaloul, L. Kaplan, J. R. Williams, D. Schlippert, P. Boegel, E.-M. Rasel, and D. I. Bondar, Asymmetric tunneling of Bose-Einstein condensates, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.56, 025302 (2023)

2023
[50]

Korshynska and S

K. Korshynska and S. Ulbricht, Generalized Josephson effect in an asymmetric double-well potential at finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. A109, 043321 (2024)

2024
[51]

Trenkwalder, G

A. Trenkwalder, G. Spagnolli, G. Semeghini, S. Coop, M. Landini, P. Castilho, L. Pezz` e, G. Modugno, M. Ingus- cio, A. Smerzi, and M. Fattori, Quantum phase transi- tions with parity-symmetry breaking and hysteresis, Nat. Phys.12, 826 (2016)

2016
[52]

C. P. Rubbo, S. R. Manmana, B. M. Peden, M. J. Hol- land, and A. M. Rey, Resonantly enhanced tunneling and transport of ultracold atoms on tilted optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A84, 033638 (2011)

2011
[53]

C. Sias, A. Zenesini, H. Lignier, S. Wimberger, D. Ciampini, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Resonantly En- hanced Tunneling of Bose-Einstein Condensates in Peri- odic Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 120403 (2007)

2007
[54]

Zenesini, C

A. Zenesini, C. Sias, H. Lignier, Y. Singh, D. Ciampini, O. Morsch, R. Mannella, E. Arimondo, A. Tomadin, and S. Wimberger, Resonant tunneling of Bose-Einstein con- densates in optical lattices, New J. Phys.10, 053038 (2008)

2008
[55]

A. S. Buyskikh, L. Tagliacozzo, D. Schuricht, C. A. Hoo- ley, D. Pekker, and A. J. Dale, Resonant two-site tunnel- ing dynamics of bosons in a tilted optical superlattice, Phys. Rev. A100, 023627 (2019)

2019
[56]

Bhowmik and O

A. Bhowmik and O. E. Alon, Longitudinal and transver- sal resonant tunneling of interacting bosons in a two- dimensional Josephson junction, Sci. Rep.12, 627 (2022)

2022
[57]

L. Q. Lai and Z. Li, Interference-induced suppression of particle emission from a Bose-Einstein condensate in lat- tice with time-periodic modulations, Chin. Phys. B33, 100303 (2024)

2024
[58]

L. Q. Lai, Z. Li, Q. H. Liu, and Y. B. Yu, Intermittent Emission of Particles from a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a 1D Lattice, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)536, 2300365 (2024)

2024
[59]

L. W. Clark, A. Gaj, L. Feng, and C. Chin, Collective emission of matter-wave jets from driven Bose–Einstein condensates, Nature551, 356 (2017)

2017
[60]

H. Fu, L. Feng, B. M. Anderson, L. W. Clark, J. Z. Hu, J. W. Andrade, C. Chin, and K. Levin, Density Waves and Jet Emission Asymmetry in Bose Fireworks, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 243001 (2018)

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008). 8

2008

[2] [2]

C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

2010

[3] [3]

Gati and M

R. Gati and M. K. Oberthaler, A bosonic Josephson junc- tion, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.40, R61 (2007)

2007

[4] [4]

G. J. Milburn, J. Corney, E. M. Wright, and D. F. Walls, Quantum dynamics of an atomic Bose-Einstein conden- sate in a double-well potential, Phys. Rev. A55, 4318 (1997)

1997

[5] [5]

Ananikian and T

D. Ananikian and T. Bergeman, Gross-Pitaevskii equa- tion for Bose particles in a double-well potential: Two- mode models and beyond, Phys. Rev. A73, 013604 (2006)

2006

[6] [6]

Giovanazzi, A

S. Giovanazzi, A. Smerzi, and S. Fantoni, Josephson Ef- fects in Dilute Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4521 (2000)

2000

[7] [7]

Y. Shin, M. Saba, A. Schirotzek, T. A. Pasquini, A. E. Leanhardt, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Distillation of Bose-Einstein Condensates in a Double-Well Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 150401 (2004)

2004

[8] [8]

Giovanazzi, J

S. Giovanazzi, J. Esteve, and M. K. Oberthaler, Effec- tive parameters for weakly coupled Bose-Einstein con- densates, New J. Phys.10, 045009 (2008)

2008