Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 102 references

Spectroscopy shows NGC 7492 has real tidal tails that only look mixed with the Sagittarius stream.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-30 11:02 UTC pith:4XRQRUWW

load-bearing objection Solid spectroscopic confirmation of NGC 7492’s tidal tails and clean separation from Sgr; the ~17-star extra-tidal sample is real enough, but purity is unquantified. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23829 v1 pith:4XRQRUWW submitted 2026-07-26 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Neighbors, Not Kin: Kinematic evidence for tidal tails from NGC 7492 along the Sagittarius stream

Camila Navarrete , \'Alvaro Rojas-Arriagada , Andr\'es E. Piatti , Julio A. Carballo-Bello , Luca Sbordone , Richa Kundu , Vasily Belokurov , Sergey E. Koposov
show 3 more authors
Eduardo Vitral Pierre Boldrini Pedro A. Palicio
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords globular clusterstidal tailsNGC 7492Sagittarius streamradial velocitiesstellar kinematicsMilky Way halochemical abundances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Outer-halo globular cluster NGC 7492 sits on the sky at the same distance as the Sagittarius stream, so photometry alone could not settle whether it has tidal tails. This paper takes multi-object spectra in ten fields along the expected tails, measures radial velocities and metallicities for hundreds of stars, and combines those with Gaia proper motions and colors. It finds a sparse population that matches the cluster in motion and chemistry out to at least 1.8 degrees, while Sagittarius stars in the same fields are clearly separated by proper motion, velocity, and higher metallicity. The extra-tidal stars also line up with particle-spray models of the cluster coming apart. A sympathetic reader cares because faint cluster debris can still be isolated inside a major halo stream, which matters for how we count stars shed by disrupted clusters into the Milky Way halo.

Core claim

Cluster and extra-tidal stars selected jointly on proper motion, radial velocity, and metallicity extend at least about 1.8 degrees from NGC 7492, confirming the tidal tails previously seen only in photometry. Their sky positions match particle-spray models of the cluster’s disruption. The Sagittarius stream is recovered in the same fields through different proper motions, different radial velocities, and a more metal-rich population, so the two structures overlap in projection but are physically unrelated.

What carries the argument

Blind-ish multi-parameter membership: loose proper-motion windows, a wide radial-velocity cut around the cluster mean, CMD proximity to a cluster isochrone, and metallicity consistency for higher-S/N spectra, then compared with particle-spray debris models and Sagittarius stream models.

Load-bearing premise

The claim assumes that stars passing those wide simultaneous cuts are mostly true cluster debris, not chance halo interlopers at the low surface density of the tails.

What would settle it

A control field off the proposed tails, or a larger sample with precise distances or high-resolution abundances, that shows a similar density of stars passing the same velocity, proper-motion, and metallicity cuts without following the spray-model track.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Faint tidal tails around outer-halo clusters can be confirmed kinematically even when they sit on top of a major stream like Sagittarius.
  • The Sagittarius and NGC 7492 populations at this sky position are separable in 6D phase space and chemistry despite similar distance.
  • Particle-spray models that match the confirmed stars can guide searches at larger angular extent and fainter magnitudes.
  • The dataset supplies public radial velocities and metallicities for cluster and Sagittarius candidates for follow-up work.
  • Broad tail morphology and an eccentric polar orbit remain consistent with an accreted outer-halo origin rather than an in-situ or Sagittarius origin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If similar multi-parameter spectroscopy is applied to other photometrically claimed outer-halo tails on stream sightlines, some disputed features may split into true debris versus stream or field contaminants.
  • The recovered velocity and distance gradients along the tails offer a practical prior for targeting main-sequence stars too faint for the present metallicity sample.
  • A confirmed extra-tidal RRc candidate, if verified as a cluster member, would be a rare variable tracer of debris beyond the Jacobi radius for this system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The authors present a GIRAFFE/FLAMES spectroscopic campaign of ten fields along the photometrically claimed tidal tails of the outer-halo globular cluster NGC 7492, obtaining radial velocities for 718 stars and FERRE-based metallicities (calibrated to the Gaia-ESO scale) for 484 of them. Applying simultaneous cuts in radial velocity (±35 km/s around the cluster mean), proper motion (a loose ±2 mas/yr window), and position in the color–magnitude diagram (±0.2 mag about a 12 Gyr, [M/H]=−1.7 isochrone), they identify 20 cluster stars inside the Jacobi radius and ~17–18 extra-tidal candidates extending to 1.78 deg from the cluster center. They cleanly separate the Sagittarius stream population, which overlaps the tails on the sky and in distance, via its distinct proper motions, radial velocities (trailing arm at ≈−80 km/s, leading arm at ≈+80 km/s, matching Vasiliev et al. 2021), and more metal-rich chemistry (median [M/H]≈−1.03 vs −1.89 for the cluster). The extra-tidal candidates follow the N17 photometric track and the locus of particle-spray models (Chen et al. 2025b), with a measured RV gradient (12.1 km/s/deg vs 16.7 km/s/deg in the model) and a model-derived distance gradient of 1.08 kpc/deg. The authors conclude the tails are real, kinematically confirmed, and physically unrelated to Sgr.

Significance. If the result holds, this is the first spectroscopic confirmation of tidal tails around NGC 7492 and a clean demonstration that globular-cluster debris can be disentangled from a major overlapping halo substructure using 6D phase-space plus chemistry — a relevant proof of concept for stream work in crowded regions of the halo. The manuscript has concrete technical strengths: the RV pipeline is validated against Gaia DR3 and Keck/DEIMOS (median offset 0.85 km/s, robust MAD 2.4 km/s, App. A.1); the metallicity scale is calibrated to GES with null bias and 0.106 dex scatter (Fig. 3); the Sgr stream is recovered in PM–RV space in quantitative agreement with Vasiliev et al. (2021), including the trailing-to-leading arm ratio (Fig. 5); the cluster's own median RV (−174.9±0.5 km/s) and velocity dispersion (1.6±0.3 km/s) agree with and improve on literature values (App. E); and the extra-tidal structure is independently corroborated by astrometric samples (Ibata et al. 2024; 8 overlapping candidates from Chen et al. 2025a) and by one extra-tidal star with a consistent Gaia DR3 RV. The model comparison makes falsifiable predictions (RV gradient amplitude, ±2 kpc distance gradient), and the

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Fig. 7] The central claim — spectroscopic confirmation of the tidal tails — rests on only ~17 stars beyond the Jacobi radius passing three simultaneous cuts (RV ±35 km/s; PM ±2 mas/yr, i.e. 10× the bound-cluster ellipse; CMD ±0.2 mag). No control field, shifted-window test, or contamination model is presented, so the expected number of chance halo interlopers passing all three cuts is unknown. This is feasible with the data in hand: the 766-star parent sample covers the full PM–RV–CMD space, and applying the identical selection at RV centers offset from the cluster (e.g., ±70, ±105 km/s, avoiding the Sgr peaks at ∓80 km/s) or at PM centers offset from (0.7, −2.3) mas/yr would directly bound the interloper rate as a function of angular separation. Given the small sample, if even 4–6 of the 17 are interlopers the 'kinematic signature clearly detected' language (Abstract; §6) needs to be softened a
  2. [§4.3, Fig. 8, Table D.1] The claim that extra-tidal metallicities are 'consistent' with the cluster is not uniformly supported by the authors' own table. The extra-tidal dispersion is 0.39 dex versus 0.18 dex for the inner sample, and Table D.1 retains extra-tidal candidates at [M/H] = −0.77, −0.94, −1.33, and −1.42, near the Sgr/field mean rather than the cluster's −1.89. Most of these have large individual errors and are excluded from Fig. 8 by the σ[M/H]≤0.1 dex cut, but the star at r=72.9′ (source 2406438363126723968) has [M/H]=−1.42±0.01 at S/N=116: it cannot be attributed to low S/N and sits ~0.5 dex above the cluster median. Only the single [M/H]=−0.73 outlier was excised (§4.3). The authors should either (i) apply an explicit, uniform metallicity-membership criterion and report how many extra-tidal candidates it removes, or (ii) discuss the metal-rich retained stars individually (e.g., are they consisten
  3. [§5.1, App. H] The RV window of ±35 km/s was explicitly chosen to accommodate the ±30 km/s gradient predicted by the simulation (§4.2), so the amplitude of the recovered RV gradient (Fig. 10; App. H) is partially bounded by construction — candidates cannot display ΔRV outside the window. The sign and fitted slope (12.1 vs 16.7 km/s/deg from the model) remain informative, and the distance-gradient argument is independent, but the text should state clearly that the gradient amplitude comparison is conditioned on a window sized from the same model. A useful robustness test would be to refit the gradient excluding stars within, say, 5 km/s of the window edges, or to verify the gradient is significant within an inner RV sub-window that does not reference the model amplitude.
minor comments (7)
  1. [App. G vs §5.1/Fig. 10] The stream-aligned coordinate definitions appear swapped relative to their use: Appendix G states that 'ϕ1 measures the perpendicular displacement from the stream, and ϕ2 increases along the stream,' yet the stream extends ±2 deg in ϕ1 in Figs. 10 and H.1, and the RV and distance gradients are measured along ϕ1 (dD/dϕ1 = 1.08 kpc/deg). Please reconcile the definitions with the usage.
  2. [§4.3, §6, Table D.1] The extra-tidal star count is inconsistent across the text: §4.3 refers to 18 stars outside the tidal radius ('eleven stars out of 18'), §6 reports 17, and Table D.1 contains 18 rows beyond the tidal radius (38 total). Presumably 17 reflects the excision of the [M/H]=−0.73 star, but please state this explicitly and reconcile. Related: the excised star is given as [M/H]=−0.73 with source ID 2410110457085084288 (§4.3 and footnote 6), but that source ID does not appear in Table D.1, which instead lists a star at [M/H]=−0.77 (2409598183450835584, r=34.3′). Clarify which star was removed and whether Table D.1 includes the excised star.
  3. [§4.2 vs App. E] The selection window is centered on the Baumgardt & Hilker (2018) mean RV of −176.7 km/s, but the paper's own cluster measurement is −174.9±0.5 km/s (App. E). The 1.8 km/s offset is harmless given the ±35 km/s window, but the choice should be stated in one place with the rationale (e.g., consistency with the literature prior to this analysis).
  4. [Fig. 4, §5.1, §4.2, §1, §6] Typographical/notation items: '12 Gry' twice in the Fig. 4 caption (should be Gyr); 'galav1.9.1' (§5.1) presumably means 'gala v1.9.1'; 'To asses' (§5.1); 'the same are of the sky' (§4.2, should be 'area'); 'in Chen et al. (2025a) were more than 90 stars' (§1, should be 'where'); 'for 766 of stars' (§6).
  5. [Fig. 5] Fig. 5, middle panel: the boxcar smoothing is applied only to the Carballo-Bello et al. (2018) histogram and not to this work's; the caption should say so explicitly (the text does, but the caption is silent). Also, the normalization factors (×5, ×0.2) differ between panels and deserve a one-line justification.
  6. [App. B] Table B.2 is described in the text as listing 'three stars' from Ramos et al. (2022) not passing the PM cut, but the preceding sentence says four; one (2409573650597520512) is reassigned to the cluster sample. Please make the accounting explicit.
  7. [§5.1, Fig. 9] Fig. 9 states there are no stars in common with Ibata et al. (2024) because the three apparent overlaps are separated by >1 arcsec; given Gaia astrometric precision, stating the actual separations (or a cross-match radius) would strengthen this. The eight confirmed overlaps with Chen et al. (2025a) are a genuinely useful independent check and could be highlighted in the abstract or conclusions.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Observational membership selection and external-model comparison; no derivation that forces the tails by construction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2.1 / Fig. 1; Aims and Introduction (N17)]
    "To trace the potential tidal tails emerging from NGC 7492, we followed the contours outlined in N17 and selected several fields along the tails to obtain spectra for as many stars as possible in each field."

    Field placement and the photometric structure being “confirmed” are taken from Navarrete et al. (2017a) by the same lead author. This is minor and not load-bearing: the new claim rests on independent GIRAFFE RVs, metallicities, Gaia PMs, and external spray/Sgr models, not on N17 alone. Flagged only as ordinary self-citation that guided targeting.

full rationale

The paper’s central claim is spectroscopic confirmation of extra-tidal stars around NGC 7492 and their kinematic separation from the Sagittarius stream. Membership is obtained by wide supervised windows centered on the known cluster mean PM, mean RV, and a fixed isochrone (Sec. 4.2; Fig. 7), then checked against metallicity, spatial alignment with N17’s photometric contour, and independent particle-spray (Chen et al. 2025b) and Sgr (Vasiliev et al. 2021) models. That is standard catalog selection, not a self-definitional or fitted-input “prediction.” Field placement followed the lead author’s prior photometric map (N17), which is ordinary self-citation and not load-bearing for the new RV/metallicity evidence. The RV window (±35 km s⁻¹) was chosen wide enough to admit an expected stream gradient; recovering a gradient inside that window is weakly assisted by the cut size but is not equivalent to the input by construction (slope and spatial locus remain independent). No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of a known result appears. Score 1 reflects only the minor N17 self-reference for targeting; the kinematic confirmation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational confirmation paper. Load-bearing inputs are standard Galactic-dynamics and stellar-spectroscopy assumptions plus literature cluster parameters and external N-body/stream models used for comparison, not new physics entities. Free parameters are the hand-chosen selection window widths and the adopted MW/cluster potentials in the spray and orbit integrations.

free parameters (5)
  • RV membership window half-width = ±35 km/s
    Stars kept if |RV − (−176.7 km/s)| ≤ 35 km/s; width chosen by hand to allow stream gradients over ~4 deg (Sec. 4.2).
  • Proper-motion membership ellipse scale = 10× ellipse (~±2 mas/yr)
    PM cut set to 10× the bound-cluster PM ellipse, ~±2 mas/yr about the Vasiliev & Baumgardt mean (Sec. 4.2).
  • CMD isochrone tolerance = ±0.2 mag
    ±0.2 mag about a fixed PARSEC isochrone ([M/H]=−1.7, 12 Gyr, E(B−V)=0) without folding photometric errors into the cut (Sec. 4.2).
  • S/N and [M/H] error thresholds = S/N≥10, σ≤0.1 dex
    Metallicity used only for S/N≥10 and σ_[M/H]≤0.1 dex; discards a large fraction of the sample (App. A.2).
  • MilkyWayPotential / cluster Plummer parameters in spray model = M_h=5.4e11 M⊙, M_GC=2e4 M⊙, etc.
    Halo mass, disk, bulge, and M_GC=2e4 M⊙, b≈8.11 pc adopted from literature for Chen+25b particle spray and galpy orbit (Sec. 5.1–5.2).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 astrometry and parallaxes sufficiently separate foreground dwarfs when parallax>0.5 mas and extreme PMs are cut.
    Target selection and foreground cleaning (Sec. 2.1); residual disk dwarfs still appear in the Kiel diagram.
  • domain assumption FERRE full-spectrum fits on HR21 CaT spectra, after quadratic calibration to GES, yield [M/H] on an astrophysical scale to ~0.1 dex for S/N≥10.
    Sec. 3.2 and Fig. 3 calibration; BHB stars excluded as grid-edge failures.
  • domain assumption Vasiliev et al. (2021) Sgr particle model and Chen et al. (2025b) spray DF correctly predict local PM/RV structure for comparison.
    Used to define Sgr PM corridor and expected tail morphology/gradients (Secs. 4.1, 5.1).
  • domain assumption Literature cluster mean distance, tidal/Jacobi radii, and mean PM/RV are accurate enough to center membership windows.
    Baumgardt & Hilker, Vasiliev & Baumgardt, Zhang+22, etc., cited throughout Secs. 4–5.
  • standard math Standard cross-correlation and spectrum-fitting mathematics (CCF, χ² template matching, spline normalization).
    Sec. 3 RV and FERRE analysis.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 34553 in / 3604 out tokens · 88100 ms · 2026-07-30T11:02:48.246701+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The formation, extension, and morphology of extra-tidal stars around globular clusters depend on the internal kinematics of the host cluster and the Galactic potential. Tracing the kinematics of faint tidal tails sheds light on their formation and contribution to the Milky Way halo. NGC 7492 is an outer halo globular cluster with conflicting evidence regarding the presence of tidal tails. If present, the tails are expected to be faint and overlap on the sky with the Sagittarius stream, located at a similar heliocentric distance but with distinct kinematics. We carried out a GIRAFFE spectroscopic follow-up of ten fields covering the expected tidal tails of NGC 7492. Gaia parallaxes were used to remove foreground contaminants, while only loose proper-motion constraints were applied in the target selection. Radial velocities and metallicities were derived for more than 700 stars, from the red giant branch to the upper main sequence. Cluster and extra-tidal stars were identified from their proper motions, radial velocities, and metallicities. This population extends at least 1.8 deg from the cluster center, confirming the tidal tails previously detected only photometrically, with positions consistent with particle-spray models of the cluster disruption. The Sagittarius stream is clearly identified through its distinct proper motions, radial velocities, and more metal-rich population. Despite the low spatial density of the extra-tidal stars, their kinematic signature is clearly detected, demonstrating that the tidal tails overlap on the sky with the Sagittarius stream but are physically unrelated. This spectroscopic dataset provides a robust basis for future studies of the tails at larger angular extents and fainter magnitudes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23829 by \'Alvaro Rojas-Arriagada, Andr\'es E. Piatti, Camila Navarrete, Eduardo Vitral, Julio A. Carballo-Bello, Luca Sbordone, Pedro A. Palicio, Pierre Boldrini, Richa Kundu, Sergey E. Koposov, Vasily Belokurov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spatial distribution of Gaia DR3 sources following the trace of the tidal tails from N17 (dashed grey contour). The center of the clus￾ter is shown with a black plus symbol. Each of the FLAMES pointings is marked as dashed blue circles, while the preliminary extra-tidal can￾didates, based on the CMD and isochrone of the cluster, are shown as orange points. The observed targets are shown as grey dots. 2. Da… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of the sky subtraction. Top panel: The extracted spec￾trum for a star with S/N = 12 (Gmag = 19.3 mag, orange line) and the associated median sky spectrum for the field, from the median average of the individual sky spectra (blue line). Bottom panel: Co-added stellar spectrum after sky removal, with S/N = 17. Most of the sky lines are effectively removed, particularly the ones around 8650 Å. bottom … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the Teff vs log(g) diagram for our entire sam￾ple. Only results for stars with spectra with SNR≥ 10 are color coded by calibrated metallicity. This threshold is defined based on the large [M/H] error obtained for spectra having lower SNR, see Appendix A.2. The range covered by the three synthetic spectral grids are depicted with colored areas. Hot stars, such as BHB stars, were recovered at the edge … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: RV distribution of our sample. Top panel: Gaia DR3 proper mo￾tions of our stars (colored based on the heliocentric RV), and for Sgr stream particles (Vasiliev et al. 2021, blue dots) within 5 deg from the cluster center. The median proper motion of the cluster and the Sgr component are marked with a black ellipse and a blue solid line, re￾spectively. Middle panel: RV distribution (orange line) for the obse… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Heliocentric RVs for the simulated Sgr particles from Vasiliev et al. (2021) located up to 15 degrees from the cluster center (black dots) as a function of the Sgr stream longitude Λe⊙. The trailing arm is the most prominent branch of the Sgr stream at this position, while the model predicts as well an older leading arm (at RV ∼100 km s−1 ) and trailing arm (RV ∼ −250 km s−1 ). Sgr stream stars up to 15 de… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of the observed (grey circles), Sgr stream candidates (blue circles) and extra-tidal star candidates. In each subpanel, the extra￾tidal star candidates are selected differently. Top left: Angular distance versus RV, showing the selected candidates passing the CMD and PM cuts as orange circles. The vertical line corresponds to the tidal radius. The dashed orange lines define the RV cut. Star sy… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spray particle distribution for the cluster stars (Chen et al. 2025b). The NGC 7492 cluster and extra-tidal stars are shown as purple circles (or purple stars for BHB stars), while the stars from the stream #84 from Ibata et al. (2024) and the stars from Chen et al. (2025a) are shown as light blue circles and green crosses, respectively. The inner orange circle corresponds to the tidal radius of the cluste… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Metallicity from the FERRE analysis of the spectra. Top panel: RV and metallicity for a subsample of stars, having spectra with S/N ≥ 10 and [M/H] errors≤0.1 dex. Stars associated to the cluster (inside and outside the Jacobi radius) are marked with violet unfilled and filled circles, respectively, while stars likely associated with the Sgr stream are marked with blue circles. The horizontal lines correspo… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: RV and distance variations along the tidal tails. Top panel: RV difference with respect to the mean RV of the cluster for the stream par￾ticles from the Chen et al. (2025b) distribution function (background points) and the observed extra-tidal candidates (circles and stars). Bot￾tom panel: Distance difference from the particles and stars. kpc from the mean distance of the cluster (24.39 kpc). This is equi… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Galactocentric coordinates for the integrated orbit of the clus￾ter (black lines). The corresponding distribution of spray particles is included as grey dots, while the cluster and extra-tidal candidate stars adopting the corresponding distance based on the distance gradient are shown violet circles. The BHB stars are shown as star symbols. NGC 7492 do not provide compelling evidence for such a sce￾nario,… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d , archivePrefix =. 1804.08657 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Exploring the formation mechanisms of tidal structures in globular clusters of extragalactic origin. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557628 , archivePrefix =. 2601.01110 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Globular Cluster Streams as Galactic High-Precision Scales the Poster Child Palomar 5. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/80 , archivePrefix =. 1502.02658 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    The devil is in the tails: the role of globular cluster mass evolution on stream properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2708 , archivePrefix =. 1702.02543 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    The structure of accreted stellar streams. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac238 , archivePrefix =. 2201.11045 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Butterfly in a Cocoon, Understanding the Origin and Morphology of Globular Cluster Streams: The Case of GD-1. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2e07 , archivePrefix =. 1903.08141 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  7. [7]

    The outer envelopes of globular clusters. II. NGC 1851, NGC 5824 and NGC 1261 ^ *. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2353 , archivePrefix =. 1709.02915 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Characterization and history of the Helmi streams with Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834769 , archivePrefix =. 1812.00846 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Tidal tails of star clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15690.x , archivePrefix =. 0909.2619 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Destruction of the Galactic Globular Cluster System. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/303441 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9603042 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Internal dynamics of globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s001590050008 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9610076 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Stellar Escape from Globular Clusters. I. Escape Mechanisms and Properties at Ejection. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbcc1 , archivePrefix =. 2211.16523 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical evolution of star clusters in tidal fields. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06286.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0211471 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    The Keck/DEIMOS Stellar Archive. I. Uniform Velocities and Metallicities for 78 Milky Way Dwarf Galaxies and Globular Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae290d , archivePrefix =. 2602.10200 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Dynamical Masses and Metallicities for a Uniform Sample of Milky Way Satellites

    The Keck/DEIMOS Stellar Archive: II. Dynamical Masses and Metallicities for a Uniform Sample of Milky Way Satellites. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.10202 , archivePrefix =. 2602.10202 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10202

  16. [16]

    Galactic Globular Cluster Metallicity Scale from the Ca II Triplet I. Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/133958 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9707067 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Specific processing and validation of all-sky RR Lyrae and Cepheid stars: The RR Lyrae sample

    Gaia Data Release 3. Specific processing and validation of all-sky RR Lyrae and Cepheid stars: The RR Lyrae sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243964 , archivePrefix =. 2206.06278 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202347338

    The Galactic bulge exploration - I. The period–absolute magnitude–metallicity relations for RR Lyrae stars for GBP, V, G, GRP, I, J, H, and Ks passbands using Gaia DR3 parallaxes , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202347338", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347338", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347338

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    The PGPUC horizontal branch evolutionary tracks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555099 , archivePrefix =. 2506.16562 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Variable Stars in Galactic Globular Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/323719 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0108024 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Clean catalogues of blue horizontal-branch stars using Gaia EDR3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040074 , archivePrefix =. 2108.05172 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [23]

    , keywords =

    S ^ 5 : New insights from deep spectroscopic observations of the tidal tails of the globular clusters NGC 1261 and NGC 1904. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451930 , archivePrefix =. 2411.08991 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  23. [24]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [25]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [28]

    , keywords =

    A geometric distance measurement to the Galactic center black hole with 0.3\. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 , archivePrefix =. 1904.05721 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  27. [29]

    , keywords =

    Vertical waves in the solar neighbourhood in Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2813 , archivePrefix =. 1809.03507 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [30]

    , keywords =

    Local kinematics and the local standard of rest. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x , archivePrefix =. 0912.3693 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2010

  29. [31]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    StarStream on Gaia: Stream discovery and mass loss rate of globular clusters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  30. [32]

    , keywords =

    Robust Data-driven Metallicities for 175 Million Stars from Gaia XP Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acd53e , archivePrefix =. 2302.02611 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [33]

    , keywords =

    Probing the nature of dark matter with accreted globular cluster streams. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3597 , archivePrefix =. 2005.12919 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [34]

    , keywords =

    New Constraints on the Dark Matter Density Profiles of Dwarf Galaxies from Proper Motions of Globular Cluster Streams. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca6e5 , archivePrefix =. 2201.03571 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  33. [35]

    , keywords =

    The chemo-dynamical groups of Galactic globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1145 , archivePrefix =. 2202.00591 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [36]

    , keywords =

    The DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey Data Release 2. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac78eb , archivePrefix =. 2203.16565 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [37]

    , keywords =

    An all-sky proper-motion map of the Sagittarius stream using Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937145 , archivePrefix =. 2001.10012 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  36. [38]

    , keywords =

    A fork in the Sagittarius trailing debris. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3255 , archivePrefix =. 1612.06829 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [39]

    , keywords =

    Precession of the Sagittarius stream. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1862 , archivePrefix =. 1301.7069 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [40]

    , keywords =

    The Sagittarius Streams in the Southern Galactic Hemisphere. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/80 , archivePrefix =. 1111.7042 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [41]

    , keywords =

    The Field of Streams: Sagittarius and Its Siblings. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/504797 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0605025 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [42]

    A Two Micron All Sky Survey View of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy. I. Morphology of the Sagittarius Core and Tidal Arms. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/379504 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0304198 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [43]

    , keywords =

    Galactic Halo Substructure in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Ancient Tidal Stream from the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/318894 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0004255 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [44]

    , keywords =

    Globular cluster number density profiles using Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz651 , archivePrefix =. 1901.08072 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  43. [45]

    , keywords =

    Chemical Cartography of the Sagittarius Stream with Gaia. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad187b , archivePrefix =. 2307.08730 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [46]

    First CaT metallicities for twenty clusters

    Homogeneous metallicities and radial velocities for Galactic globular clusters. First CaT metallicities for twenty clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118138 , archivePrefix =. 1202.1304 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [47]

    , keywords =

    Using the Ca ii triplet to trace abundance variations in individual red giant branch stars in three nearby galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04785.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0107022 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2001

  46. [48]

    Photometric content and validation

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. Photometric content and validation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039587 , archivePrefix =. 2012.01916 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [49]

    , keywords =

    Proper motions and dynamics of the Milky Way globular cluster system from Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz171 , archivePrefix =. 1807.09775 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [50]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Orbits of 152 globular clusters of the MilkyWay galaxy constructed from Gaia DR2. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/7/173 , archivePrefix =. 2008.13624 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [51]

    , keywords =

    The orbital evolution of UFDs and GCs in an evolving Galactic potential. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3391 , archivePrefix =. 2011.12535 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [52]

    , keywords =

    DELVE-ing into the Milky Way's Globular Clusters: Assessing Extratidal Features in NGC 5897, NGC 7492, and Testing Detectability with Deeper Photometry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae07e0 , adsurl =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae07e0

  51. [53]

    , keywords =

    Outer density profiles of 19 Galactic globular clusters from deep and wide-field imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19663.x , archivePrefix =. 1108.4018 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2011

  52. [54]

    , keywords =

    PARSEC: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x , archivePrefix =. 1208.4498 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2012

  53. [55]

    , keywords =

    A survey for dwarf galaxy remnants around 14 globular clusters in the outer halo. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty539 , archivePrefix =. 1802.09255 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [56]

    , keywords =

    A search for stellar tidal debris of defunct dwarf galaxies around globular clusters in the inner Galactic halo. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1949 , archivePrefix =. 1409.7390 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [57]

    , keywords =

    A catalogue of masses, structural parameters, and velocity dispersion profiles of 112 Milky Way globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1057 , archivePrefix =. 1804.08359 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [58]

    , keywords =

    Gaia EDR3 view on galactic globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1475 , archivePrefix =. 2102.09568 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [59]

    , keywords =

    Was the progenitor of the Sagittarius stream a disc galaxy?. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00921.x , archivePrefix =. 1007.1485 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2010

  58. [60]

    , keywords =

    The Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy: A Model for Evolution in a Triaxial Milky Way Halo. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/229 , archivePrefix =. 1003.1132 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [61]

    , keywords =

    Tango for three: Sagittarius, LMC, and the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3673 , archivePrefix =. 2009.10726 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  60. [62]

    , keywords =

    The Sagittarius stream in Gaia Early Data Release 3 and the origin of the bifurcations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142830 , archivePrefix =. 2112.02105 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [63]

    , keywords =

    Analysis and calibration of Ca II triplet spectroscopy of red giant branch stars from VLT/FLAMES observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12532.x , archivePrefix =. 0710.0798 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2007

  62. [64]

    , keywords =

    Existence of tidal tails for the globular cluster NGC 5824. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243976 , archivePrefix =. 2208.05197 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [65]

    , keywords =

    The eye of Gaia on globular clusters structure: tidal tails. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1209 , archivePrefix =. 2004.13754 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  64. [66]

    , keywords =

    Using Gaia DR2 to detect extratidal structures around the Galactic globular cluster NGC 362. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz962 , archivePrefix =. 1904.02177 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  65. [67]

    , keywords =

    The tidal tails of Milky Way globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037994 , archivePrefix =. 2004.11747 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  66. [68]

    , keywords =

    Variations in the Width, Density, and Direction of the Palomar 5 Tidal Tails. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5afe , archivePrefix =. 1910.00592 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  67. [69]

    Feeling the Pull: a Study of Natural Galactic Accelerometers. I. Photometry of the Delicate Stellar Stream of the Palomar 5 Globular Cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1512.03054 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [70]

    , keywords =

    The Extended Tails of Palomar 5: A 10 Arc of Globular Cluster Tidal Debris. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/378601 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0307446 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [71]

    , keywords =

    Detection of Massive Tidal Tails around the Globular Cluster Palomar 5 with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319095 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0012311 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [72]

    , keywords =

    A search for stellar structures around nine outer halo globular clusters in the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac751 , archivePrefix =. 2111.09072 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [73]

    NGC 7089 (M2)

    The outer envelopes of globular clusters - I. NGC 7089 (M2). , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1561 , archivePrefix =. 1606.05949 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [74]

    , keywords =

    A 500 Parsec Halo Surrounding the Galactic Globular NGC 1851. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1570 , archivePrefix =. 0909.1755 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [75]

    , keywords =

    Properties of globular clusters formed in dark matter mini-halos. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244530 , archivePrefix =. 2112.01265 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [76]

    , keywords =

    Embedding globular clusters in dark matter minihaloes solves the cusp-core and timing problems in the Fornax dwarf galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa011 , archivePrefix =. 1909.07404 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  75. [77]

    , keywords =

    Development of multiple tidal tails around globular clusters and dwarf satellite galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2318 , archivePrefix =. 1409.2157 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [78]

    , keywords =

    Tidal Tails around Globular Clusters: Are They a Good Tracer of Cluster Orbits?. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/512114 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0611204 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [79]

    New discoveries and physical parameter determination

    Variable stars in the globular cluster NGC 7492. New discoveries and physical parameter determination. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220824 , archivePrefix =. 1305.4837 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [80]

    Charting the Galactic Acceleration Field. II. A Global Mass Model of the Milky Way from the STREAMFINDER Atlas of Stellar Streams Detected in Gaia DR3. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad382d , archivePrefix =. 2311.17202 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [81]

    , keywords =

    galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , archivePrefix =. 1412.3451 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [82]

    JOSS , keywords =

    Gala: A Python package for galactic dynamics. JOSS , keywords =. doi:10.21105/joss.00388 , adsurl =

    doi:10.21105/joss.00388

Showing first 80 references.