Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 201 references

Systematic Parameter Optimization of Quantum Molecular Dynamics Models for Hadron Therapy Using Multi-Ion Fragmentation Data

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Systematically calibrating three quantum molecular dynamics parameters against fragmentation data yields better agreement with measured fragment yields and distributions than the original models and cascade alternatives.

desk verdict A useful calibration study of QMD parameters for hadron therapy, but the headline performance claim and the energy-dominance interpretation rest on in-sample, unquantified comparisons. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24034 v1 pith:KQHSO2DO submitted 2026-07-27 nucl-th

Akihiro Haga , Yoshi-hide Sato , Daiyu Fujiwara , Dousatsu Sakata , Yuki Tominaga , David Bolst , Edward C. Simpson , Susanna Guatelli This is my paper
classification nucl-th
keywords QMDparameteroptimizationhadrontherapynuclearfragmentationwave-packetwidthmaximumevolutiontimeimpactfragmentproductioncrosssectionsionMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the predictive power of quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) models for ion-beam therapy can be substantially improved by systematic, data-driven calibration of three parameters: the Gaussian wave-packet width, the maximum evolution time, and the impact-parameter envelope. Using proton, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, neon, and magnesium projectile data from 30 to 400 MeV/u, the authors fit compact sigmoid parameterizations of the latter two quantities and show that the optimized models agree better with measured fragment production, angular, and energy distributions than the original light-ion QMD model and two intranuclear-cascade models. The paper's physical finding is that the optimal QMD evolution time depends mainly on incident energy, increasing from about 40 to 80 fm/c over the studied range, and only weakly on the masses of the collision partners. If this holds, the transition from the dynamical reaction stage to statistical decay is set by collision energy, which would simplify modeling and make fragment transport, dose, and LET calculations more reliable for hadron therapy.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the three-parameter optimization pipeline. L, the squared wave-packet width, is set by a mass-dependent form L = a A^(2/3) + b fitted to experimental charge radii from helium to lead. The maximum impact parameter is bmax = benv * sqrt(sigma_R / pi), with sigma_R from standard reaction-cross-section models and benv a fitted envelope factor; the maximum evolution time Tm is a free stopping point before statistical de-excitation. benv and Tm are each written as bounded sigmoids of the average mass number and incident energy per nucleon, and their coefficients are obtained by minimizing normalized mean-absolute-error maps built from fragment production and differential

What would settle it

Take a fixed reaction system and vary only the statistical de-excitation model (for example, changing the cluster algorithm or decay code) while re-fitting Tm; if the optimal Tm shifts substantially, it is compensating for the statistical part rather than isolating a physical transition. Alternatively, extend the Tm grid to 120 fm/c for a 400 MeV/u system: if the best agreement keeps improving beyond 80 fm/c, the paper's energy trend is an artifact of its upper bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that one calibration scheme—mass-dependent wave-packet widths fixed by charge radii, plus bounded energy/mass parameterizations of maximum evolution time and impact-parameter envelope—lets QMD models with the Skyrme SLy4 and SkM* interactions and the relativistic mean-field NS2 interaction reproduce measured fragmentation across the therapy energy range. The load-bearing result is the evolution time: it rises steeply with incident energy and barely with system size, implying the switch from dynamical evolution to statistical de-excitation is set mainly by collision energy. The envelope factor differed by interaction, NS2 needing larger peripheral contributions for light

Load-bearing premise

The physical interpretation rests on the fitted Tm carrying the true dynamical-to-statistical transition; if Tm is instead compensating for deficiencies in the statistical de-excitation or clustering models, or for the imposed 40–80 fm/c bounds, the energy-dependence conclusion does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At higher incident energies, QMD evolution must continue longer (toward 80 fm/c) before statistical decay models take over; the same Tm works for light and heavy systems at a given energy.
  • Using a mass-dependent wave-packet width removes a source of systematic size error in the initial nuclei, improving fragments for light and heavy targets alike.
  • The parameterization is a continuous function of energy and system mass, so it can be applied to reaction systems not in the fitting database within the studied range.
  • The Skyrme-model versions outperform the two cascade models on most fragment production, angular, and energy-distribution comparisons, so they are preferable for secondary-particle transport in therapy simulations.
  • Because angular and energy distributions were improved even when not used in the fit, the tuning is not just chasing production yields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Tm is truly energy-dominated, then the commonly used mass-dependent stopping times of intranuclear-cascade models encode a different assumption about when reactions equilibrate; a direct comparison on the same observables would test which view is transferable outside the fitted data.
  • Near-unity benv for the Skyrme models suggests the baseline reaction-cross-section radii already capture the collision geometry, whereas the NS2 deviations imply that interaction- or surface-related effects alter what 'peripheral' means; this could be checked against the NS2 equation of state's surface properties.
  • The hard upper bound at 80 fm/c may be artificially capping Tm for high-energy, heavy systems, so extending the range and refitting is the fastest way to see if the energy trend saturates or keeps climbing.
  • A sensitivity analysis separating L, benv, and Tm (called for but not performed in the paper) would tell whether the gains come from initialization, geometry, or evolution time—useful before embedding the parameterization in treatment planning.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper calibrates three QMD parameters—Gaussian wave-packet width L, maximum evolution time Tm, and impact-parameter envelope factor benv—for NS2, SLy4, and SkM* interactions. L is fitted to experimental charge radii; Tm and benv are parameterized as bounded sigmoid functions of the average system mass Abar and incident energy Ek, and fitted jointly to fragment production cross sections (PCS), differential cross sections (DCS), and double-differential cross sections (DDCS) for H-, C-, N-, O-, Ne-, and Mg-induced reactions over 30–400 MeV/u. The optimized models are compared with the original LiQMD, BIC, and INCL. The central claims are: (i) the optimized Tm depends strongly on incident energy but only weakly on system mass, so the dynamical-to-statistical transition is mainly energy-driven; (ii) benv shows model-dependent, generally modest adjustments; and (iii) the optimized parameterizations improve agreement with fragmentation data, with the Skyrme-based models outperforming the cascade models for most datasets. Independent consistency checks include O+C angular distributions at 400 MeV/u and C-beam fragment energy distributions at 50 and 95 MeV/u.

Significance. If the optimization is statistically robust, this is a practically valuable step for hadron-therapy Monte Carlo simulations: it provides a parameterized, multi-ion-tested QMD option for fragment production, angular, and energy distributions that feed dose, LET, and RBE calculations. The paper is also commendable for testing on published multi-institution data, for including independent holdout-style checks (O+C angular distributions, Fig. 6/Table 4; C DDCS energy distributions, Fig. 7), and for explicitly listing limitations regarding parameter-range saturation and the lack of a component-wise sensitivity analysis. However, the headline performance claim is presently supported only by point-estimate MAEs without statistical uncertainties, and the physical interpretation of Tm as 'governed mainly by collision energy' goes beyond what the fitting procedure alone can establish.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Table 3; §3.3, Table 4] The comparative performance claim rests on point estimates with no uncertainty quantification. Many differences are small relative to the reported MAE scale: for p-O, SLy4 gives 3.68 vs INCL 3.64; for C-95-H, SLy4 gives 0.28 vs LiQMD 0.29; for C-400-Cu, SkM* gives 25.50 vs LiQMD 25.17. Table 4 likewise reports MAE/χ² for the O+C holdout without error bars. Without bootstrap confidence intervals, replicate-run variability, or a statistical test on MAE differences, the statement that the optimized QMD models 'outperform the cascade models for most datasets' is not established. Please add uncertainty estimates and significance tests for the key comparisons.
  2. [§2.4, §3.2; Table 3 vs Appendix A] Most datasets in Table 3 were used to fit Tm and benv, so improvements on those rows are in-sample and expected. The only fully independent checks are one angular distribution (O+C at 400 MeV/u) and the DDCS improvement ratios, which are not aggregated into an overall out-of-sample score. To support the general claim, I recommend a systematic out-of-sample protocol, e.g., leave-one-dataset-out cross-validation, with the aggregate performance reported for held-out datasets. This is load-bearing because the contribution is explicitly a comparative performance claim.
  3. [§2.3, Eqs. (4)–(7); §4] The physical interpretation that 'Tm is governed mainly by collision energy' is not uniquely determined by the fits. The sigmoid bounds (Tmin,Tmax)=(40,80) fm/c and (bmin,bmax)=(1.0,1.3) are fixed ad hoc, and the paper itself notes both that several high-energy datasets saturate the upper Tm bound and that the relative contributions of L, Tm, and benv were not quantified (final Discussion paragraph). Tm could be compensating for deficiencies in the clustering algorithm, the de-excitation model, or the Glauber–Gribov/Barashenkov baseline bmax. Please add a sensitivity analysis: vary the sigmoid bounds, hold out datasets, or replace the de-excitation/clustering step, and report whether the fitted Tm energy dependence is preserved.
  4. [Appendix A, Tables A2–A5; §2.6] The proton-induced reference cross sections are not direct measurements: they are values extracted from fitted experimental energy dependences, and no uncertainties from those fits are propagated into the MAE metric. Since Table 3 includes many p-induced rows, the optimization and the benchmark comparison treat these interpolated values as exact ground truth. Please provide the uncertainties on the reference cross sections, or at least perform a sensitivity analysis with alternative interpolation choices, to ensure the reported MAEs are not dominated by reference-extraction errors.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] SLy4 and SkM* are reported with identical optimized (a,b) values (0.038, 0.89). State whether this is a coincidence or a consequence of the charge-radius fit, and give the fit residuals for each model.
  2. [§2.6, Eq. (8)] The normalization of each MAE map by its maximum value, before summation over reaction systems, is a nonstandard weighting choice. Please explain why normalization by the maximum is preferred over normalization by the mean or by experimental uncertainty, and how the fitted parameters depend on this choice.
  3. [§2.3] The optimization algorithm for the coefficients w_b,i and w_T,i is not described: no minimizer, initial guesses, stopping criteria, or number of grid points for the (benv,Tm) scans. Add enough detail for reproducibility.
  4. [§2.4, §3.2] The labels in Figure 5 (e.g., 'C-290-H PCS') are defined only in prose. Include a legend or table column explicitly mapping dataset abbreviations to projectile, energy, target, and observable, since Table 3 is dense.
  5. [General] Minor typographical issues: affiliation 4 lists 'Tsukua' (should be 'Tsukuba'); 'Li`ege' is used inconsistently. Also, 'LiQMD' is used both for the original model and for the Geant4 class; clarify in the text when referring to the original versus optimized variants.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: parameter calibration is explicit, and independent holdout evaluations provide non-circular evidence.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. L is calibrated to IAEA charge radii, and the charge-radius comparison (Fig. 2) is a calibration check, not an independent prediction. Tm and benv are explicitly fit by minimizing the normalized MAE loss over the fragmentation datasets (Eqs. 4-8, §2.3, §2.6); reporting lower MAE on those same datasets is an in-sample optimization result, but the paper does not disguise it as an independent prediction, and it separately evaluates held-out 16O+C 400 MeV/u angular distributions (Table 4) and 50/95 MeV/u carbon DDCS energy distributions (Fig. 7). The physical statement that Tm is primarily energy-dependent is an interpretation of the fitted sigmoid coefficients; since the ansatz included both mass and energy terms with free coefficients, the resulting dependence was not forced by the functional form. No load-bearing claim is justified only by a self-citation: prior group work is cited for model construction and earlier validation, but the benchmark performance against LiQMD, BIC, and INCL is computed in this paper under common conditions. The absence of error bars and the in-sample nature of many MAE comparisons are statistical-evidence limitations, not circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 15 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on empirically fitted parameters (L, Tm, benv), a sigmoid functional form with hand-set bounds, and assumptions that the Geant4 reaction cross-section models and statistical de-excitation stage are correct enough for the fitted parameters to carry physical meaning. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (15)
  • L slope a (SLy4) = 0.038
    Fitted to reproduce experimental charge radii via L = a A^(2/3) + b (Table 1, §2.2).
  • L intercept b (SLy4) = 0.89
    Fitted to reproduce experimental charge radii (Table 1, §2.2).
  • L slope a (SkM*) = 0.038
    Fitted to reproduce experimental charge radii (Table 1, §2.2).
  • L intercept b (SkM*) = 0.89
    Fitted to reproduce experimental charge radii (Table 1, §2.2).
  • L slope a (NS2) = 0.035
    Fitted to reproduce experimental charge radii (Table 1, §2.2).
  • L intercept b (NS2) = 0.90
    Fitted to reproduce experimental charge radii (Table 1, §2.2).
  • benv sigmoid coefficients w_b,i (NS2) = 4.4661, -5.5658, 0.0904, -12.3550
    Fitted by minimizing normalized MAE over fragmentation data (Eqs. 4-5, Table 2).
  • benv sigmoid coefficients w_b,i (SLy4) = -1.4118, 3.7204, 0.1797, -0.9302
    Fitted by minimizing normalized MAE over fragmentation data (Eqs. 4-5, Table 2).
  • benv sigmoid coefficients w_b,i (SkM*) = -1.7512, 3.9339, 0.2645, -0.9835
    Fitted by minimizing normalized MAE over fragmentation data (Eqs. 4-5, Table 2).
  • Tm sigmoid coefficients w_T,i (NS2) = -15.3361, -2.6952, 30.6721, 5.3904
    Fitted by minimizing normalized MAE over fragmentation data (Eqs. 6-7, Table 2).
  • Tm sigmoid coefficients w_T,i (SLy4) = -16.0591, -3.2840, 32.1246, 6.5699
    Fitted by minimizing normalized MAE over fragmentation data (Eqs. 6-7, Table 2).
  • Tm sigmoid coefficients w_T,i (SkM*) = -15.0899, -3.0206, 28.9999, 14.0617
    Fitted by minimizing normalized MAE over fragmentation data (Eqs. 6-7, Table 2).
  • benv bounds (b_min, b_max) = (1.0, 1.3)
    Hand-chosen bounds for the sigmoid parameterization; not fitted (§2.3).
  • Tm bounds (T_min, T_max) = (40, 80) fm/c
    Hand-chosen bounds; several high-energy fits saturate at 80 fm/c, acknowledged as a limitation (§2.3, §4).
  • Empirical weighting factor for 50/95 MeV carbon DCS = 5
    Applied to balance dataset influence; changes the fitted parameterization (§2.6).
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Tm and benv vary smoothly and monotonically with A and E according to a bounded sigmoid.
    Eqs. (4)-(7) impose this functional form without physical derivation; if wrong, the fitted maps and the energy-dependence conclusion change.
  • domain assumption Glauber-Gribov and Barashenkov reaction cross sections provide a correct baseline for bmax.
    bmax = benv * sqrt(sigma_R/pi) (Eq. 3). If the baseline cross sections are biased, benv absorbs the error.
  • domain assumption Alpha-cluster initialization remains valid for nuclei with Z,N up to 30.
    The paper extends the LiQMD alpha-cluster ansatz to heavier nuclei (§2.2) without case-by-case validation.
  • domain assumption Statistical de-excitation models after Tm are accurate enough that the fitted Tm reflects the physical QMD-to-statistical transition.
    The physical interpretation in §4 assumes Tm is not compensating for errors in the later de-excitation stage.
  • domain assumption Proton reference cross sections extracted from fitted experimental energy dependences are reliable ground truth.
    Tables A2-A5 use fitted curves from compiled proton datasets; these curves are optimization targets.
  • domain assumption Experimental charge radii from the IAEA database are accurate.
    L is fit to these radii (§2.2); any systematic bias propagates into L.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Systematic Parameter Optimization of Quantum Molecular Dynamics Models for Hadron Therapy Using Multi-Ion Fragmentation Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KQHSO2DO

@misc{pith2026260724034,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Systematic Parameter Optimization of Quantum Molecular Dynamics Models for Hadron Therapy Using Multi-Ion Fragmentation Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KQHSO2DO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24034}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) models are widely used to simulate nuclear fragmentation in hadron therapy, but their predictive accuracy depends strongly on parameters that are often selected empirically. We developed an optimized QMD framework by systematically calibrating three parameters for a relativistic mean-field model with the NS2 parameter set and Skyrme models with the SLy4 and SkM* parameter sets: the wave-packet width L, maximum evolution time Tm, and impact-parameter envelope factor benv. The wave-packet width was determined from experimental charge radii, whereas Tm and benv were parameterized as functions of incident kinetic energy and reaction-system mass and optimized using proton- and heavy-ion-induced fragmentation data over 30-400 MeV/u. Performance was compared with the original LiQMD, Binary Cascade, and Liege Intranuclear Cascade models. The optimized Tm depended strongly on incident energy but only weakly on system mass, indicating that the transition from the dynamical QMD stage to statistical de-excitation is governed mainly by collision energy. In contrast, benv showed model-dependent behavior: NS2 favored larger peripheral-collision contributions for lighter systems at low energies, whereas the Skyrme models showed relatively weak energy and mass dependence. The optimized parameterizations improved agreement with experimental fragment production cross sections, angular distributions, and energy distributions. The optimized Skyrme models achieved the best overall performance and outperformed the cascade models for most datasets. This framework provides a physically consistent description of nuclear fragmentation across multiple observables and may improve calculations of secondary-particle transport, dose deposition, and linear energy transfer in hadron therapy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24034 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the QMD framework and parameter optimization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of calculated nuclear charge radii with experimental data for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Maps of benv calculated using Eq. (4) with the optimized parameters: (a) NS2 parameter set in the relativistic mean-field model, (b) SLy4 parameter set, and (c) SkM* parameter set in the non-relativistic Skyrme model. Circles indicate the reaction systems for which experimental data are available. over all reaction systems and parameter-grid points simultaneously. Because the 50 and 95 MeV/u carbon-ion datasets prov… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Maps of Tm calculated using Eq. (6) with the optimized parameters for (a) NS2, (b) SLy4, and (c) SkM*. Circles indicate the reaction systems for which experimental data are available. remaining around 1.1–1.2. Thus, the RMF model (NS2) showed a stronger system dependen…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Heat map of the MAE ratio relative to the original LiQMD model for all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Angular distributions of He, Li, Be, B, C, and N fragments produced in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Improvement ratio for fragment energy distributions relative to the original [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Masuda, Takamitsu and Koto, Masashi and Ikawa, Hiroaki and Takei, Hideyuki and Aoki, Katsumi and Nakaji, Taku and Kasamatsu, Koki and Inaniwa, Taku , title =. Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adc5d6 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adc5d6 2025

  2. [2]

    and Arsini, Lorenzo and Bagulya, Alexander and Bolst, David and Brown, Jeremy M

    Arce, Pedro and Archer, Jay W. and Arsini, Lorenzo and Bagulya, Alexander and Bolst, David and Brown, Jeremy M. C. and Caccia, Barbara and Chacon, Andrew and Cirrone, Giuseppe Antonio Pablo and Cortés-Giraldo, Miguel Antonio and Cutajar, Dean and Cuttone, Giacomo and Dondero, Paolo and Dotti, Andrea and Faddegon, Bruce and Fattori, Serena and Fedon, Chris...

  3. [3]

    and Bolst, D

    Arce, P. and Bolst, D. and Bordage, M.-C. and Brown, J. M. C. and Cirrone, P. and Cortés-Giraldo, M. A. and Cutajar, D. and Cuttone, G. and Desorgher, L. and Dondero, P. and Dotti, A. and Faddegon, B. and Fedon, C. and Guatelli, S. and Incerti, S. and Ivanchenko, V. and Konstantinov, D. and Kyriakou, I. and Latyshev, G. and Le, A. and Mancini-Terracciano,...

  4. [4]

    Barashenkov, V. S. and Mashnik, S. G. , title =. 2001 , url =

    2001

  5. [5]

    , title =

    Grichine, Vladimir M. , title =. The European Physical Journal C , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  6. [6]

    and Beltran, Chris J

    Parisi, Alessio and Furutani, Keith M. and Beltran, Chris J. , title =. Medical Physics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17755 , url =. https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/mp.17755 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.17755

  7. [7]

    and Frank, Steven J

    Ebner, Daniel K. and Frank, Steven J. and Inaniwa, Taku and Yamada, Shigeru and Shirai, Toshiyuki , TITLE=. Frontiers in Oncology , VOLUME=. 2021 , URL=. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.624786 , ISSN=

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Radiation Research , number =

    Jeannette Jansen and Olga Sokol and Yolanda Prezado and Marco Durante , title =. Radiation Research , number =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

Show all 201 references
  1. [9]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Inaniwa, Taku and Kanematsu, Nobuyuki and Shinoto, Makoto and Koto, Masashi and Yamada, Shigeru , title =. Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac29cc , url =

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    and Joiner, Michael C

    Chen, Zhe and Dominello, Michael M. and Joiner, Michael C. and Burmeister, Jay W. , TITLE=. Frontiers in Oncology , VOLUME=. 2023 , URL=. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1133909 , ISSN=

    2023

  3. [11]

    Ramaekers and Madelon Pijls-Johannesma and Manuela A

    Bram L.T. Ramaekers and Madelon Pijls-Johannesma and Manuela A. Joore and Piet. Systematic review and meta-analysis of radiotherapy in various head and neck cancers: Comparing photons, carbon-ions and protons , journal =. 2011 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2010....

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    Extension of the Li\`ege intranuclear-cascade model to reactions induced by light nuclei , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054602 , url =

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Quantum molecular dynamics model based on relativistic mean field theory for light nucleus fragmentation in hadron therapy , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/cbkv-ltx7 , url =

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    and others , title =

    Fontes, P. and others , title =. Physical Review C , volume =. 1977 , doi =

    1977

  7. [15]

    and others , title =

    Fontes, P. and others , title =. Nuclear Physics A , volume =. 1971 , doi =

    1971

  8. [16]

    and others , title =

    Panin, V. and others , title =. Physics Letters B , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  9. [17]

    and Lal, D

    Honda, M. and Lal, D. , title =. Nuclear Physics , volume =

  10. [18]

    Dickson, J. M. and Randle, T. C. , title =. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A , volume =

  11. [19]

    and others , title =

    Gauvin, H. and others , title =. Nuclear Physics , volume =. 1962 , doi =

    1962

  12. [20]

    and others , title =

    Brun, C. and others , title =. Journal de Physique et le Radium , volume =. 1962 , doi =

    1962

  13. [21]

    Aleksandrov, V. N. and others , title =. Voprosy Atomnoy Nauki i Tekhniki, Seriya Yadernaya Fizika Issledovaniya , volume =

  14. [22]

    and others , title =

    Matsushita, K. and others , title =. Nuclear Physics A , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  15. [23]

    and others , title =

    Horst, F. and others , title =. Physics in Medicine and Biology , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  16. [24]

    Davids, C. N. and others , title =. Physical Review C , volume =. 1970 , doi =

    1970

  17. [25]

    and others , title =

    Akagi, T. and others , title =. Radiation Measurements , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  18. [26]

    Measday, D. F. , title =. Nuclear Physics , volume =. 1966 , doi =

    1966

  19. [27]

    Whitehead, A. B. and Foster, J. S. , title =. Canadian Journal of Physics , volume =

  20. [28]

    Vdovin, A. I. and others , title =. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Fizicheskaya , volume =. 1979 , note =

    1979

  21. [29]

    , title =

    Dittrich, B. , title =

  22. [30]

    and others , title =

    Dittrich, B. and others , title =

  23. [31]

    Sisterson, J. M. and others , title =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  24. [32]

    and others , title =

    Michel, R. and others , title =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  25. [33]

    and Gauvin, H

    Bimbot, R. and Gauvin, H. , title =. Comptes Rendus de l'Acad

  26. [34]

    and others , title =

    Valentin, L. and others , title =. Physics Letters , volume =

  27. [35]

    Foley, K. J. and others , title =. Nuclear Physics , volume =. 1962 , doi =

    1962

  28. [36]

    , title =

    Valentin, L. , title =. Nuclear Physics , volume =

  29. [37]

    and others , title =

    Masuda, T. and others , title =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  30. [38]

    Titarenko, Yu. E. and others , title =. Physics of Atomic Nuclei , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  31. [39]

    and others , title =

    Leya, I. and others , title =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  32. [40]

    Khandaker, M. U. and others , title =. Journal of the Korean Physical Society , volume =

  33. [41]

    Kuznetsova, M. Ja. and others , title =. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , year =

  34. [42]

    Steyn, G. F. and others , title =. Applied Radiation and Isotopes , volume =

  35. [43]

    Al-Saleh, F. S. and others , title =. Radiochimica Acta , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  36. [44]

    and others , title =

    Garrido, E. and others , title =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =

  37. [45]

    Aleksandrov, V. N. and others , title =. Soviet Atomic Energy , volume =

  38. [46]

    Mills, S. J. and others , title =. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part A. Applied Radiation and Isotopes , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    1992

  39. [47]

    and others , title =

    Shahid, M. and others , title =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =

  40. [48]

    Graves, S. A. and others , title =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =

  41. [49]

    Fox, M. B. and others , title =. Physical Review C , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  42. [50]

    2020 , doi =

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  43. [51]

    2025 , publisher=

    Akihiro Haga , title=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  44. [52]

    New potentialities of the Li

    Boudard, Alain and Cugnon, Joseph and David, J-C and Leray, Sylvie and Mancusi, Davide , journal=. New potentialities of the Li. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  45. [53]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    Statistical multifragmentation of nuclei , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  46. [54]

    Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology , volume=

    Recent developments in pre-equilibrium and de-excitation models in Geant4 , author=. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology , volume=

  47. [55]

    A simulation program for the evaporation and the fission process of an excited nucleus , author=

    The GEM code. A simulation program for the evaporation and the fission process of an excited nucleus , author=. 2001 , institution=

    2001

  48. [56]

    Effect of isospin-dependent cluster recognition on the observables in heavy ion collisions , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.051602 , url =

    2012 doi

  49. [57]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Deviations of the energy-momentum tensor from equilibrium in the initial state for hydrodynamics from transport approaches , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  50. [58]

    Zeitschrift f

    Nuclear ground-state properties in a relativistic Meson-Field theory , author=. Zeitschrift f. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  51. [59]

    Nuclear Physics A , volume=

    Relativistic mean field study of light nuclei , author=. Nuclear Physics A , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  52. [60]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    New parametrization for the Lagrangian density of relativistic mean field theory , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  53. [61]

    Lalazissis and S

    G.A. Lalazissis and S. Karatzikos and R. Fossion and D. Pena Arteaga and A.V. Afanasjev and P. Ring , abstract =. The effective force NL3 revisited , journal =. 2009 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.070 , url =

    2009 doi

  54. [62]

    Physics Letters B , volume=

    Rho meson coupling in the relativistic mean field theory and description of exotic nuclei , author=. Physics Letters B , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  55. [63]

    Nuclear Physics A , volume=

    Relativistic mean-field theory for unstable nuclei with non-linear and terms , author=. Nuclear Physics A , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  56. [64]

    Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics , volume=

    New effective interactions in relativistic mean field theory with nonlinear terms and density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling , author=. Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  57. [65]

    Horowitz and Brian D

    C.J. Horowitz and Brian D. Serot , abstract =. The relativistic two-nucleon problem in nuclear matter , journal =. 1987 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90370-8 , url =

    1987 doi

  58. [66]

    Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories: Volume 3 , pages=

    Relativistic nuclear many-body theory , author=. Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories: Volume 3 , pages=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  59. [67]

    Ring , keywords =

    P. Ring , keywords =. Relativistic mean field theory in finite nuclei , journal =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(96)00054-3 , url =

    1996 doi

  60. [68]

    Poincaré invariant Hamiltonian dynamics: Modelling multi-hadronic interactions in a phase space approach , journal =

    Heinz Sorge and Horst Stöcker and Walter Greiner , abstract =. Poincaré invariant Hamiltonian dynamics: Modelling multi-hadronic interactions in a phase space approach , journal =. 1989 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(89)90136-X , url =

    1989 doi

  61. [69]

    Huang and N

    Tomoyuki Maruyama and S.W. Huang and N. Ohtsuka and Guoqiang Li and Amand Faessler and J. Aichelin , abstract =. Lorentz-covariant description of intermediate energy heavy-ion reactions in relativistic quantum molecular dynamics , journal =. 1991 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/...

    1991 doi

  62. [70]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics , year=

    Relativistic Effects in Transverse Flow in the Molecular Dynamics Framework , author=. Progress of Theoretical Physics , year=

  63. [71]

    Cluster formation in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024611 , url =

    2018 doi

  64. [72]

    Relativistic effects in simulations of the fragmentation process with the microscopic framework , journal =

    Tomoyuki Maruyama and Toshiki Maruyama and Koji Niita , abstract =. Relativistic effects in simulations of the fragmentation process with the microscopic framework , journal =. 1995 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(95)00976-R , url =

    1995 doi

  65. [73]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Consequences of a covariant description of heavy-ion reactions at intermediate energies , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  66. [74]

    Correlation of the hyperon potential stiffness with hyperon constituents in neutron stars and heavy-ion collisions , journal =

    Si-Na Wei and Zhao-Qing Feng and Wei-Zhou Jiang , keywords =. Correlation of the hyperon potential stiffness with hyperon constituents in neutron stars and heavy-ion collisions , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138658 , url =

    2024

  67. [75]

    Medical physics , volume=

    Report on G4-Med, a Geant4 benchmarking system for medical physics applications developed by the Geant4 Medical Simulation Benchmarking Group , author=. Medical physics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  68. [76]

    Medical Physics , year=

    Results of a Geant4 benchmarking study for bio-medical applications, performed with the G4-Med system , author=. Medical Physics , year=

  69. [77]

    Sensitivity of the excitation functions of collective flow to relativistic scalar and vector meson interactions in the relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model RQMD.RMF

    Nara, Yasushi and Stoecker, Horst. Sensitivity of the excitation functions of collective flow to relativistic scalar and vector meson interactions in the relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model RQMD.RMF. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054902. arXiv:1906.03537

    2019 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Momentum-dependent potential and collective flows within the relativistic quantum molecular dynamics approach based on relativistic mean-field theory , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024913 , url =

    2020 doi

  71. [79]

    and Aichelin, J

    Marty, R. and Aichelin, J. , journal =. Molecular dynamics description of an expanding q /. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034912 , url =

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    Constraint formalism of classical mechanics , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1978 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1881 , url =

    1978 doi

  73. [81]

    Interacting relativistic particles , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1978 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1887 , url =

    1978 doi

  74. [82]

    Space-time orbits for interacting relativistic particles: Syntactic versus semantic observables , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1978 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3617 , url =

    1978 doi

  75. [83]

    Buss and T

    O. Buss and T. Gaitanos and K. Gallmeister and H. Transport-theoretical description of nuclear reactions , journal =. 2012 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.12.001 , url =

    2012 doi

  76. [84]

    Origin of transverse momentum in relativistic heavy-ion collisions: Microscopic study , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 1991 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.43.2728 , url =

    1991 doi

  77. [85]

    Angeli and K.P

    I. Angeli and K.P. Marinova , keywords =. Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update , journal =. 2013 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006 , url =

    2013 doi

  78. [86]

    The European Physical Journal A-Hadrons and Nuclei , volume=

    The binary cascade , author=. The European Physical Journal A-Hadrons and Nuclei , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  79. [87]

    Medical physics , volume=

    The relative biological effectiveness for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ion beams using passive and scanning techniques evaluated with fully 3D silicon microdosimeters , author=. Medical physics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  80. [88]

    Physics in Medicine and Biology , abstract =

    M De Napoli and C Agodi and G Battistoni and A A Blancato and G A P Cirrone and G Cuttone and F Giacoppo and M C Morone and D Nicolosi and L Pandola and V Patera and G Raciti and E Rapisarda and F Romano and D Sardina and A Sarti and A Sciubba and V Scuderi and C Sfienti and S...

    doi

  81. [89]

    International journal of radiation oncology* biology* physics , volume=

    Results of carbon ion radiotherapy in 152 patients , author=. International journal of radiation oncology* biology* physics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  82. [90]

    Cancer , volume=

    Clinical results and risk factors of proton and carbon ion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma , author=. Cancer , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  83. [91]

    Radiation oncology , volume=

    Hypofractionated carbon ion therapy delivered with scanned ion beams for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma--feasibility and clinical response , author=. Radiation oncology , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  84. [92]

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics , volume=

    Multi-institutional study of carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan carbon-ion radiation oncology study group (J-CROS) study 1403 pancreas , author=. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  85. [93]

    Reviews of modern physics , volume=

    Heavy-ion tumor therapy: Physical and radiobiological benefits , author=. Reviews of modern physics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  86. [94]

    International journal of radiation biology , volume=

    Biological characteristics of carbon-ion therapy , author=. International journal of radiation biology , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  87. [95]

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics , volume=

    Quantification of the relative biological effectiveness for ion beam radiotherapy: direct experimental comparison of proton and carbon ion beams and a novel approach for treatment planning , author=. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics , volume=. 2010...

    2010

  88. [96]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    RBE and related modeling in carbon-ion therapy , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  89. [97]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    On the clinical spatial resolution achievable with protons and heavier charged particle radiotherapy beams , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  90. [98]

    New journal of physics , volume=

    Secondary beam fragments produced by 200 MeV u- 1 12C ions in water and their dose contributions in carbon ion radiotherapy , author=. New journal of physics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  91. [99]

    The European Physical Journal D , volume=

    Ion beam transport calculations and treatment plans in particle therapy , author=. The European Physical Journal D , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  92. [100]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Experimental characterization of lateral profiles of scanned proton and carbon ion pencil beams for improved beam models in ion therapy treatment planning , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  93. [101]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume=

    Improved integrated nucleus-nucleus inelastic cross sections for light nuclides in Geant4 , author=. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  94. [102]

    Advances in Space Research , volume=

    Nuclear fragmentation of high-energy heavy-ion beams in water , author=. Advances in Space Research , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  95. [103]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Influence of fragment reaction of relativistic heavy charged particles on heavy-ion radiotherapy , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  96. [104]

    Radiation protection dosimetry , volume=

    Experimental fragmentation studies with 12C therapy beams , author=. Radiation protection dosimetry , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  97. [105]

    Journal of radiation research , volume=

    Irradiation system for HIMAC , author=. Journal of radiation research , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  98. [106]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Double-differential fragmentation cross-section measurements of 95 MeV/nucleon 12 C beams on thin targets for hadron therapy , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  99. [107]

    and Colin, J

    Divay, C. and Colin, J. and Cussol, D. and Finck, Ch. and Karakaya, Y. and Labalme, M. and Rousseau, M. and Salvador, S. and Vanstalle, M. , journal =. Differential cross section measurements for hadron therapy: 50 MeV/nucleon ^. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044602 , url =

    2017 doi

  100. [108]

    and Guetersloh, S

    Zeitlin, C. and Guetersloh, S. and Heilbronn, L. and Miller, J. and Fukumura, A. and Iwata, Y. and Murakami, T. , journal =. Fragmentation cross sections of 290 and 400 MeV/nucleon ^. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014911 , url =

    2007 doi

  101. [109]

    and Miller, J

    Zeitlin, C. and Miller, J. and Guetersloh, S. and Heilbronn, L. and Fukumura, A. and Iwata, Y. and Murakami, T. and Blattnig, S. and Norman, R. and Mashnik, S. Fragmentation of 14-N, 16-O, 20-Ne, and 24-Mg Nuclei at 290 to 1000 MeV/nucleon. Phys. Rev. C. 2011. doi:10.1103/Phys...

    2011 arXiv

  102. [110]

    and Toppi, M

    Ridolfi, R. and Toppi, M. and Mengarelli, A. and Dondi, M. and Alexandrov, A. and Alpat, B. and Ambrosi, G. and Argir\`o, S. and Barbanera, M. and Bartosik, N. and Battistoni, G. and Bisogni, M. G. and Boccia, V. and Cavanna, F. and Cerello, P. and Ciarrocchi, E. and De Gregor...

    2025

  103. [111]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume=

    Validation of Geant4 physics models for nuclear beams in extended media , author=. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  104. [112]

    Medical physics , volume=

    Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls , author=. Medical physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  105. [113]

    Physica medica , volume=

    PET iterative reconstruction incorporating an efficient positron range correction method , author=. Physica medica , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  106. [114]

    Frontiers of Physics , volume=

    Progress of quantum molecular dynamics model and its applications in heavy ion collisions , author=. Frontiers of Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  107. [115]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Benchmarking geant4 nuclear models for hadron therapy with 95 MeV/nucleon carbon ions , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  108. [116]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Sato, Yoshi-Hide and Sakata, Dousatsu and Bolst, David and Simpson, Edward C and Guatelli, Susanna and Haga, Akihiro , title =. Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a9a , url =

    2022 doi

  109. [117]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Experimental study of nuclear fragmentation of 200 and 400 MeV/u 12C ions in water for applications in particle therapy , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  110. [118]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , volume=

    Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for heavy ion therapy , author=. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  111. [119]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Benchmarking nuclear models of FLUKA and GEANT4 for carbon ion therapy , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  112. [120]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Comparative study of alternative Geant4 hadronic ion inelastic physics models for prediction of positron-emitting radionuclide production in carbon and oxygen ion therapy , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  113. [121]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Assessment and improvements of Geant4 hadronic models in the context of prompt-gamma hadrontherapy monitoring , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  114. [122]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Stability of nuclei in peripheral collisions in the JAERI quantum molecular dynamics model , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  115. [123]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Improved quantum molecular dynamics model and its applications to fusion reaction near barrier , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  116. [124]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Analysis of the (N, xN') reactions by quantum molecular dynamics plus statistical decay model , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  117. [125]

    1999 , institution=

    Development of JQMD (JAERI quantum molecular dynamics) code , author=. 1999 , institution=

    1999

  118. [126]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Further development of the improved quantum molecular dynamics model and its application to fusion reactions near the barrier , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  119. [127]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Skyrme interaction and nuclear matter constraints , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  120. [128]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Elliptic flow and system size dependence of transition energies at intermediate energies , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  121. [129]

    Physics Letters B , volume=

    Constraints on nucleon effective mass splitting with heavy ion collisions , author=. Physics Letters B , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  122. [130]

    Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions , pages=

    Perturbation Scheme for the Effective Nuclear Force , author=. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions , pages=

  123. [131]

    Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses , pages=

    Nuclear ground-state properties from mean-field calculations , author=. Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses , pages=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  124. [132]

    Annals of Nuclear Energy , volume=

    A study on ground-state energies of nuclei by using neural networks , author=. Annals of Nuclear Energy , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  125. [133]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=

    Dynamics of clusters and fragments in heavy-ion collisions , author=. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  126. [134]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Nuclear-interaction correction of integrated depth dose in carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  127. [135]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Nuclear-interaction correction for patient dose calculations in treatment planning of helium-, carbon-, oxygen-, and neon-ion beams , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  128. [136]

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , volume=

    Antisymmetrized molecular dynamics and its applications to cluster phenomena , author=. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  129. [137]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics , volume=

    Near-and far-side contributions to ejectile polarization , author=. Progress of Theoretical Physics , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  130. [138]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Dipole excitation of Li 6 and Be 9 studied with an extended quantum molecular dynamics model , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  131. [139]

    2006 , publisher=

    Pattern recognition and machine learning , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  132. [140]

    Spherical description , author=

    Nuclear ground-state properties and self-consistent calculations with the Skyrme interaction:(I). Spherical description , author=. Nuclear Physics A , volume=. 1975 , publisher=

    1975

  133. [141]

    Nuclear Physics A , volume=

    Towards a better parametrisation of Skyrme-like effective forces: A critical study of the SkM force , author=. Nuclear Physics A , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  134. [142]

    Accuracy of the mean-field theory in describing ground-state properties of light nuclei , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2023 , month =

    2023

  135. [143]

    Heavy Ion Physics and Its Applications , chapter =

    Toshiki Maruyama and Koji Niita and Akira Iwamoto , title =. Heavy Ion Physics and Its Applications , chapter =. doi:10.1142/9789814447195_0014 , abstract =

    doi

  136. [144]

    ``Soft'' interaction parameter sets in the extended quantum molecular dynamics model , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054621 , url =

    2024 doi

  137. [145]

    International Journal of Particle Therapy , year=

    VALIDATION OF THE LIGHT ION QMD MODEL FOR 12C ION THERAPY IN GEANT4 , author=. International Journal of Particle Therapy , year=

  138. [146]

    Nuclei far from stabilities , author=

    A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabilities , author=. Nuclear Physics A , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  139. [147]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Effect of isospin-dependent cluster recognition on the observables in heavy ion collisions , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  140. [148]

    RMF , author=

    Sensitivity of the excitation functions of collective flow to relativistic scalar and vector meson interactions in the relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model RQMD. RMF , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  141. [149]

    Physical Review C , volume=

    Momentum-dependent potential and collective flows within the relativistic quantum molecular dynamics approach based on relativistic mean-field theory , author=. Physical Review C , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  142. [150]

    Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , volume=

    Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update , author=. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  143. [151]

    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION , title =

    Kalyanmoy Deb and Amrit Pratap and Sameer Agarwal and T Meyarivan , issue =. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION , title =

  144. [152]

    Kalyanmoy Deb , title =

  145. [153]

    A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications , volume =

    Nyoman Gunantara , doi =. A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications , volume =. Cogent Engineering , month =

  146. [154]

    A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems , year =

    Christian von Lücken and Benjamín Barán and Carlos Brizuela , doi =. A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems , year =. Computational Optimization and Applications , month =

  147. [155]

    Agostinelli and J

    S. Agostinelli and J. Allison and K. Amakoet, et al. , doi =. Geant4—a simulation toolkit , volume =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , month =

  148. [156]

    Allison and K

    J. Allison and K. Amako and J. Apostolakiset, et al. , doi =. Geant4 developments and applications , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science , month =

  149. [157]

    Allison and K

    J. Allison and K. Amako and J. Apostolakiset, et al. , doi =. Recent developments in Geant4 , volume =. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , month =

  150. [158]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Chacon, Andrew and Rutherford, Harley and Hamato, Akram and Nitta, Munetaka and Nishikido, Fumihiko and Iwao, Yuma and Tashima, Hideaki and Yoshida, Eiji and Akamatsu, Go and Takyu, Sodai and Kang, Han Gyu and Franklin, Daniel R and Parodi, Katia and Yamaya, Taiga and Rosenfel...

    2024 doi

  151. [159]

    In Beam PET Acquisition on 75 MeV

    Lestand, Loïc and Montarou, Gérard and Force, Paul and Joly, Baptiste and Lambert, Daniel and Magne, Magali and Martin, Franck and Rozes, Arnaud and Vert, Pierre Etienne and Chadelas, Robert , journal=. In Beam PET Acquisition on 75 MeV. 2017 , volume=

    2017

  152. [160]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Measurement of PET isotope production cross sections for protons and carbon ions on carbon and oxygen targets for applications in particle therapy range verification , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  153. [161]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Hofmann, T and Pinto, M and Mohammadi, A and Nitta, M and Nishikido, F and Iwao, Y and Tashima, H and Yoshida, E and Chacon, A and Safavi-Naeini, M and Rosenfeld, A and Yamaya, T and Parodi, K , title =. Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1088/1...

    2019 doi

  154. [162]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Pinto, M and Bajard, M and Brons, S and Chevallier, M and Dauvergne, D and Dedes, G and De Rydt, M and Freud, N and Krimmer, J and La Tessa, C and Létang, J M and Parodi, K and Pleskač, R and Prieels, D and Ray, C and Rinaldi, I and Roellinghoff, F and Schardt, D and Testa, E ...

    2014 doi

  155. [163]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =

    Dedes, G and Pinto, M and Dauvergne, D and Freud, N and Krimmer, J and Létang, J M and Ray, C and Testa, E , title =. Physics in Medicine & Biology , abstract =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/7/1747 , url =

    2014 doi

  156. [164]

    2023 , Journal =

    Simultaneous quantitative imaging of two PET radiotracers via the detection of positron-electron annihilation and prompt gamma emissions , Author =. 2023 , Journal =. doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01060-y , Number =

    2023 doi

  157. [165]

    Journal of Instrumentation , volume=

    Prompt- production of 220 MeV/u 12C ions interacting with a PMMA target , author=. Journal of Instrumentation , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  158. [166]

    Prompt-gamma fall-off estimation with C-ion irradiation at clinical energies, using a knife-edge slit camera: A Monte Carlo study , journal =

    Andrea Missaglia and Aicha Bourkadi-Idrissi and Francesco Casamichiela and Davide Mazzucconi and Marco Carminati and Stefano Agosteo and Carlo Fiorini , keywords =. Prompt-gamma fall-off estimation with C-ion irradiation at clinical energies, using a knife-edge slit camera: A ...

    2023

  159. [167]

    N. D. Birell and P. C. W. Davies , year = 1982, title =

    1982

  160. [168]

    R. P. Feynman. Phys.\ Rev. 1954

    1954

  161. [169]

    Einstein and Yu Podolsky and N

    A. Einstein and Yu Podolsky and N. Rosen. Phys.\ Rev. 1935

    1935

  162. [170]

    G. P. Berman, Jr. and F. M. Izrailev, Jr. Stability of nonlinear modes. Physica D. 1983

    1983

  163. [171]

    E. B. Davies and L. Parns. Trapped modes in acoustic waveguides. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1988

    1988

  164. [172]

    Edward Witten. 2001. hep-th/0106109

    2001 arXiv

  165. [173]

    E. Beutler. Williams Hematology. 1994

    1994

  166. [174]

    Donald E. Knuth. Fundamental Algorithms. 1973b 1973

    1973

  167. [175]

    J. S. Smith and G. W. Johnson. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 2005

    2005

  168. [176]

    W. J. Smith and T. J. Johnson and B. G. Miller. Surface chemistry and preferential crystal orientation on a silicon surface. 2010

    2010

  169. [177]

    V. K. Smith and K. Johnson and M. O. Klein. Surface chemistry and preferential crystal orientation on a silicon surface. 2010

    2010

  170. [178]

    Lower Bounds for Wishful Research Results

    Ulrich \" U nderwood and Ned \ N et and Paul \= P ot. Lower Bounds for Wishful Research Results

  171. [179]

    M. P. Johnson and K. L. Miller and K. Smith. 2007

    2007

  172. [180]

    AIP Conf. Proc. 2007

    2007

  173. [181]

    Fifteenth Annual

    Proc. Fifteenth Annual

  174. [182]

    Y. Burstyn. Proceedings of the 5th International Molecular Beam Epitaxy Conference, Santa Fe, NM. 2004

    2004

  175. [183]

    Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, Portland, OR, 12-16 May 2005. 2001

    2003

  176. [184]

    A. G. Agarwal. Proceedings of the Fifth Low Temperature Conference, Madison, WI, 1999. Semiconductors. 2001

    1999

  177. [185]

    R. Smith. Hummingbirds are our friends. 2001

    2001

  178. [186]

    J. Smith. Proc. SPIE. 2007

    2007

  179. [187]

    An O(n n / \! n) Sorting Algorithm

    Tom T \' e rrific. An O(n n / \! n) Sorting Algorithm

  180. [188]

    Mastering Thesis Writing

    \' E douard Masterly. Mastering Thesis Writing

  181. [189]

    S. R. Kawa and S.-J. Lin. J. Geophys. Res. 2003

    2003

  182. [190]

    Phidias Phony-Baloney

    F. Phidias Phony-Baloney. Fighting Fire with Fire: Festooning F rench Phrases

  183. [191]

    Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1973c 1981

    1981

  184. [192]

    Jill C. Knvth. The Programming of Computer Art

  185. [194]

    Ballagh and C.M

    R. Ballagh and C.M. Savage. Bose-Einstein condensation: from atomic physics to quantum fluids. Proceedings of the 13th Physics Summer School. 2000. cond-mat/0008070

    2000 arXiv

  186. [195]

    Opechowski and R

    W. Opechowski and R. Guccione. Introduction to the Theory of Normal Metals. Magnetism. 1965

    1965

  187. [196]

    J. M. Smith. Molecular Dynamics. 1980

    1980

  188. [197]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat. Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1971

    1971

  189. [198]

    Daniel D. Lincoll. Semigroups of Recurrences. High Speed Computer and Algorithm Organization

  190. [199]

    Oaho and Jeffrey D

    Alfred V. Oaho and Jeffrey D. Ullman and Mihalis Yannakakis. On Notions of Information Transfer in VLSI Circuits. Proc. Fifteenth Annual ACM

  191. [200]

    The Definitive Computer Manual

    Larry Manmaker. The Definitive Computer Manual

  192. [201]

    we need reference here

  193. [202]

    Sakata, et al., Evaluation of early radiation DNA damage in a fractal cell nucleus model using Geant4-DNA, Phys

    D. Sakata, et al., Evaluation of early radiation DNA damage in a fractal cell nucleus model using Geant4-DNA, Phys. Med. 62 (2019) 152--157

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.