Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Floquet time-convolutionless master equation for non-Markovian driven quantum systems

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Floquet time-local master equation shows that quasienergy crossings create almost decoherence-protected subspaces and sharp peaks of non-Markovianity in driven open systems.

desk verdict Solid Floquet-TCL derivation that explains HEOM non-Markovianity peaks via a clean degeneracy block structure; the linear-drive Fourier approximation is a real soft spot but does not sink the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24406 v1 pith:XBQRW5E7 submitted 2026-07-27 quant-ph

Pietro Follia , Heinz-Peter Breuer , Bassano Vacchini This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords Floquettheorytime-convolutionlessmasterequationnon-Markovianitydrivenopenquantumsystemsspin-bosonmodelquasienergydegeneracydissipativedecoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Periodically driven open quantum systems are usually treated with Markovian Floquet-Lindblad equations that break down near quasienergy degeneracies and cannot capture memory. This paper derives a time-local Floquet time-convolutionless master equation that keeps the driving exact while expanding the system-bath coupling only to second order and never invoking the Markov approximation. Applied to the driven spin-boson model, the equation reproduces strong information backflow and, in the long-time average, recovers the familiar Floquet-Lindblad limit. Its distinctive prediction is that quasienergy crossings produce sharp peaks in the trace-distance non-Markovianity measure: at those points the dissipator decouples into a two-dimensional Bloch subspace, leaving one direction almost protected from decoherence and thereby lengthening relaxation times enough for repeated distinguishability revivals. The result supplies both a practical non-Markovian tool for driven platforms and a microscopic explanation of how driving amplitude can be used to switch memory effects on and off.

What carries the argument

Floquet time-convolutionless (Floquet-TCL) master equation: the second-order TCL generator written in the Floquet basis, with rates fixed by Floquet-Fourier coefficients of the coupling operator and the bath correlation function. At degeneracy (and when the relevant coefficient is real) it collapses to a block-diagonal dynamical matrix that decouples one Bloch direction.

What would settle it

Compute the exact Floquet-Fourier coefficients (or run HEOM) for the linearly driven spin-boson model at the reported quasienergy-crossing amplitudes and check whether the trace-distance non-Markovianity still exhibits the predicted sharp peaks and whether one Bloch direction remains long-lived.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The Floquet time-convolutionless master equation, obtained by expressing the interaction-picture coupling operator in the Floquet basis and truncating the TCL generator at second order, describes strong non-Markovian dynamics of periodically driven two-level systems. At quasienergy degeneracies the Kossakowski matrix and Lamb-shift Hamiltonian reorganize so that dissipation is confined to a Bloch plane while the orthogonal direction is nearly decoherence-free; the resulting quasienergy-induced dissipative decoupling produces sharp peaks of the trace-distance non-Markovianity measure versus driving amplitude.

Load-bearing premise

For the linearly driven spin-boson example the Floquet-Fourier coefficients are replaced by a simple hand approximation valid only for strong resonant driving, and the decoupling structure further requires that coefficient to be essentially real; if either fails near the crossings the protected subspace and the non-Markovianity peaks need not appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Driving amplitude can be tuned through quasienergy crossings to switch strong memory effects on or off in spin-boson-type platforms.
  • Near those crossings an almost decoherence-protected Bloch direction becomes available for coherence-protection protocols.
  • The same Floquet-TCL construction extends immediately to other periodic drives, spectral densities and system-bath couplings once the Floquet-Fourier coefficients are known.
  • In the Markovian long-time average the equation reduces to Floquet-Lindblad, recovering standard damping rates away from degeneracies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same decoupling mechanism should appear in any periodically driven open system whose Floquet-Fourier coefficients become real (or purely imaginary) at a quasienergy crossing, not only the linear spin-boson case.
  • Because the protected direction is identified analytically from the Kossakowski matrix, the framework can be used to design driving waveforms that maximize the lifetime of a chosen coherence.
  • Comparing Floquet-TCL predictions against exact HEOM at intermediate coupling strengths would quantify how far the second-order truncation remains reliable once the peaks are present.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The authors combine the second-order time-convolutionless (TCL) projection operator technique with Floquet theory to derive a time-local master equation for a periodically driven two-level system coupled to a bosonic bath, without the Markov approximation (Sec. II, Eq. 14). The coupling operator is decomposed in the Floquet basis with quasienergies ±ε and periodic amplitudes c_±(t), c_z(t) (Eqs. 8-10), and the Kossakowski coefficients and Lamb shift are given explicitly in terms of these and the bath correlation function (Eqs. 16-19). In the degenerate limit ε→0, assuming c_+(t) real, the Kossakowski matrix acquires a block form (Eq. 26) in which dissipation is confined to the x-z plane of the Bloch sphere — the 'quasienergy-induced dissipative decoupling' — producing a slowly decaying direction and hence large trace-distance revivals. Applied to the linearly driven spin-boson model with a Lorentz-Drude bath, the authors recover the undriven TCL and Floquet-Lindblad limits (Secs. III.B, V.A) and compute the BLP non-Markovianity measure versus driving amplitude, finding sharp peaks at the quasienergy crossings Ω ≈ {2.68, 4.27, 5.88, 7.43, 9.00}ω₀ (Fig. 2), in agreement with prior HEOM results of Ref. [14].

Significance. If the mechanism holds up under the requested validation, the paper is a useful and timely contribution: it supplies the first genuinely non-Markovian microscopic explanation of the quasienergy-crossing peaks previously seen only in HEOM numerics, and it does so with explicit analytic coefficients (Appendix B), checked reduction limits (undriven TCL in Sec. III.B; Floquet-Lindblad rates in Eq. 59-60), and a concrete, falsifiable structural prediction (the protected Bloch-sphere direction at degeneracy, Fig. 1 bottom). The framework is general enough to apply beyond the spin-boson example. The peak phenomenon itself has independent support from [14]; the paper's added value is the decoupling interpretation, which is precisely the part that currently rests on an unverified approximation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.D, Eq. (49)-(50); Sec. II.D] The decoupling structure of Eq. (26) requires c_+(t) real (Re >> Im), and the concrete model replaces the Floquet-Fourier coefficients by c^n_+ = delta_{n,0}, c^n_z = (1/5)(delta_{n,1}+delta_{n,-1}), imported from [14] for Omega >~ omega. Yet Sec. III.D states the coefficients are computed numerically 'by standard techniques', and no comparison between exact and approximate coefficients, and no error bound, is given — in particular at the crossings Omega ~ {2.68, 4.27, ...} omega_0 in Fig. 2, the first of which sits at Omega/omega = 2.68, only marginally in the stated regime. The phase of c_+ is decisive: the paper itself notes that almost-purely-imaginary c_+ flips the protected plane (x-z to y-z), and the resonant RWA solution (Eq. 47) gives c_+ = i sin(omega t), purely imaginary. Since Fig. 2 is computed at exact resonance, which regime the exact Floquet states realize is asserted, no
  2. [Sec. V.B, Fig. 2] The agreement with the HEOM results of [14] is described as 'striking', but it is not demonstrated: no HEOM data are overlaid in Fig. 2, and peak positions and heights are not compared quantitatively. Since this agreement is the principal external validation of the Floquet-TCL approach, the manuscript should show the HEOM non-Markovianity curve on the same axes (or tabulate peak positions/heights) and state the level of quantitative agreement, including any discrepancies attributable to the second-order truncation or to Eq. (49).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. V.A, Eq. (60)] Eq. (60) gives b_zz = (2/25) J(omega)(1+n(omega)), but since b_zz = a_zz and Eq. (59) gives a_zz = (2/25) J(omega)(1+2n(omega)), the factor (1+n(omega)) appears to be a typo for (1+2n(omega)). Relatedly, the text just below uses N(omega) where n(omega) is meant.
  2. [Sec. III.D, Eq. (50)] Eq. (50) prints c_z(t) = (2 sqrt(2)/5) cos(omega t), but Eq. (49) implies c_z(t) = (2/5) cos(omega t) — consistent with the 4/25 prefactor in Eq. (B3). Please remove the spurious sqrt(2) or clarify.
  3. [Sec. II.C / Sec. V.B] Second-order TCL generators are not completely positive in general. A brief remark on whether positivity of the evolved states is preserved (or monitored) in the simulated parameter regime would strengthen the non-Markovianity analysis of Sec. V.
  4. [Sec. III.B; Sec. V.B] Sec. III.B: 'it straightforward to compute' should read 'it is straightforward to compute'. Sec. V.B: 'accurately faithfully captures' is redundant.
  5. [Fig. 1 caption] Fig. 1: please state the units of the time axis and confirm that epsilon = 0.167 is in units of omega_0; also indicate how the maximizing pairs were found (sampling of Sec. IV is described only in Sec. V.B).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Floquet-TCL is an independent second-order derivation; self-citation to prior HEOM work and the imported Floquet-Fourier ansatz support but do not force the non-Markovianity peaks.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Sec. III.D, Eq. (49)–(50); used in Sec. V and Fig. 2]
    "we therefore compute both the quasienergies and the Floquet-Fourier coefficients numerically by standard techniques. For simplicity, we assume a driving frequency close to resonance, ω∼ω0, and restrict our attention to the case in which Ω≳ω, where the Floquet-Fourier coefficients can be accurately approximated by [14] cn+ =δn,0, cnz =1/5(δn,1 +δn,−1). Substituting these coefficients into Eq. (10) yields c±(t)=1, cz(t)=2/√2 /5 cos(ωt), so that in particular c+(t) is well approximated by a real quantity."

    The concrete linearly driven numerics (and the reality of c+ that selects the x–z dissipative plane) rest on a coefficient ansatz imported from the authors’ prior paper [14], not re-derived or error-bounded in-paper against the numerical Floquet solution they say is available. This is a mild ansatz-via-citation step: it shapes which protected direction appears, but N[Φ] is still computed from the resulting TCL generator rather than fitted to equal the HEOM peaks, so the central claim is not forced by construction.

full rationale

The master equation is obtained from the standard second-order TCL generator written in the Floquet interaction picture (Secs. II.A–C, Eqs. 11–19). The structural simplification at quasienergy degeneracy (block Kossakowski matrix, quasienergy-induced dissipative decoupling) follows algebraically from setting ε=0 and taking c_+(t) real (Sec. II.D, Eqs. 24–27, 35); it is not defined in terms of the non-Markovianity measure. Non-Markovianity is then computed by integrating the homogeneous Bloch equation for the difference vector and maximizing revivals (Secs. IV–V, Eqs. 56–57); the peaks in Fig. 2 are outputs of that integration, not fitted inputs. Agreement with HEOM peaks from the authors’ prior Ref. [14] is presented as external corroboration, and [14]’s Markovian Floquet-Lindblad interpretation is explicitly noted to predict zero memory—so the present non-Markovian generator is not circularly identical to that citation. The only mild circularity-adjacent element is the hand approximation for the linearly driven Floquet-Fourier coefficients (Eq. 49), taken from [14] and used for the concrete spin-boson numerics; that is a modeling ansatz that could affect correctness near crossings, but it is not a fit of the target N[Φ] nor a definitional identity between input and claimed prediction. Score 2 reflects that limited self-citation/ansatz import without load-bearing reduction of the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on standard open-systems perturbation (second-order TCL, factorized initial state, traceless Hermitian coupling), Floquet theory for periodic HS(t), a Lorentz-Drude thermal bosonic bath, and model-specific approximations for Floquet-Fourier coefficients and reality of c_+(t) that enable the decoupling structure. No new physical constants are fitted to force the peaks; drive and bath parameters are chosen in the weak-coupling structured-bath regime where TCL is expected to apply.

free parameters (2)
  • Floquet-Fourier weight 1/5 for c^n_z (n=±1) = 1/5
    In Sec. III.D the linear-drive coefficients are replaced by cn_+=δn,0 and cn_z=(1/5)(δn,1+δn,-1) for Ω≳ω, attributed to prior numerics [14] rather than derived here for each Ω; the non-Markovianity scan uses this fixed form.
  • Bath and drive simulation parameters (α, Λ, β, ω=ω0) = α=0.1ω0, Λ=1.2ω0, β=1.0ω0
    Chosen by hand to keep weak coupling and allow memory (α=0.1ω0, Λ=1.2ω0, β=1.0ω0); they set the scale of rates and peaks but are not fitted to match HEOM peak heights in this manuscript.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Second-order time-convolutionless expansion with factorized initial state ρS⊗ρE and vanishing first moment of bath operators yields the exact reduced dynamics up to O(coupling²).
    Sec. II.C, Eqs. 11–13; standard TCL premise; fails if coupling is not weak or initial correlations matter.
  • standard math Periodic HS(t) admits a Floquet decomposition US(t)=∑|un(t)⟩⟨un(0)|e^{-iεn t} with periodic Floquet states.
    Sec. II.A, Eq. 5; classical Floquet theory.
  • domain assumption At quasienergy degeneracy ε=0 with c_+(t) real (or Re c_+ ≫ Im c_+), the Kossakowski matrix reduces to the block form Eq. 26 (dissipation in x–z, coherence along y).
    Sec. II.D; structural step that defines quasienergy-induced dissipative decoupling.
  • domain assumption Bath is thermal bosonic with Lorentz-Drude spectral density J(ϖ)=αϖΛ/(ϖ²+Λ²), giving the closed correlation function in Appendix A.
    Sec. III.A; model choice enabling analytic coefficients.
  • domain assumption Non-Markovianity is quantified by the Breuer-Laine-Piilo trace-distance measure maximized over orthogonal pure pairs on the Bloch sphere.
    Sec. IV, Eqs. 53–57; standard but definition-dependent notion of memory.
invented entities (1)
  • quasienergy-induced dissipative decoupling independent evidence
    purpose: Name the structural simplification of the Floquet-TCL dissipator and Lamb shift at quasienergy degeneracy that isolates an almost decoherence-protected Bloch direction.
    Introduced in Sec. II.D and used to explain non-Markovianity peaks; it is a named mechanism deduced from the master-equation algebra, not a new particle or force. Independent handle is the predicted peak locations at known quasienergy crossings and the protected Bloch direction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet time-convolutionless master equation for non-Markovian driven quantum systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XBQRW5E7

@misc{pith2026260724406,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet time-convolutionless master equation for non-Markovian driven quantum systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XBQRW5E7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24406}
}
read the original abstract

We study the dynamics of open quantum systems driven by an external time-periodic force. Combining Floquet theory and the time-convolutionless projection operator technique we derive a time-local quantum master equation which exactly takes into account the periodic driving, while treating the system-environment interaction within second order in the coupling strength without performing the Markov approximation. The resulting equation of motion for the reduced density matrix is called Floquet time-convolutionless master equation. Employing the example of the driven spin-boson system, we demonstrate that this master equation is capable of describing strong non-Markovian effects, while yielding the Floquet-Lindblad master equation in the Markovian limit. A characteristic feature of memory effects in such driven dissipative systems is the emergence of sharp peaks of the trace-distance based non-Markovianity measure as a function of the driving amplitude, which can be traced back to quasienergy crossings leading to almost decoherence-protected subspaces through a quasienergy-induced dissipative decoupling mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24406 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: Trace distance for a pair of states maximizing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Non-Markovianity (top) and quasienergies (bottom) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [14]

    P. M. Follia, B. Vacchini, and H.-P. Breuer, Control of mem- ory effects in a spin-boson system by periodic driving, Physical Review A113, 022203 (2026)

    2026

  2. [1]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  3. [2]

    Vacchini,Open Quantum Systems: Foundations and Theory, Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    B. Vacchini,Open Quantum Systems: Foundations and Theory, Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    Rivas, S

    A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non- Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection, Reports On Progress in Physics77, 094001 (2014)

    2014

  5. [4]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini,Colloquium : Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  6. [5]

    Chru ´sci´nski, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Phys

    D. Chru ´sci´nski, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Phys. Rep.992, 1 (2022)

    2022

  7. [6]

    Bl ¨umel, A

    R. Bl ¨umel, A. Buchleitner, R. Graham, L. Sirko, U. Smilan- sky, and H. Walther, Dynamical localization in the microwave interaction of Rydberg atoms: The influence of noise, Physical Review A44, 4521 (1991)

    1991

  8. [7]

    Grifoni and P

    M. Grifoni and P. H ¨anggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Physics Reports304, 229 (1998)

    1998

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    Farina and V

    D. Farina and V . Giovannetti, Open-quantum-system dynamics: Recovering positivity of the redfield equation via the partial sec- ular approximation, Phys. Rev. A100, 012107 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Mozgunov and D

    E. Mozgunov and D. A. Lidar, Completely positive master equation for arbitrary driving and small level spacing, Quantum 4, 227 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    Huang, P

    Z. Huang, P. S. Mundada, A. Gyenis, D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, and J. Koch, Engineering dynamical sweet spots to pro- tect qubits from 1/fnoise, Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 034065 (2021). 12

    2021

  4. [11]

    Hausinger and M

    J. Hausinger and M. Grifoni, Dissipative two-level system un- der strong ac driving: A combination of Floquet and Van Vleck perturbation theory, Physical Review A81, 022117 (2010)

    2010

  5. [12]

    Mori, Floquet States in Open Quantum Systems, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics14, 35 (2023)

    T. Mori, Floquet States in Open Quantum Systems, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics14, 35 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    Mickiewicz, V

    K. Mickiewicz, V . Link, and W. T. Strunz, Benchmarking flo- quet master equations for periodically driven open quantum systems (2026), arXiv:2606.06341 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Shibata, Y

    F. Shibata, Y . Takahashi, and N. Hashitsume, A generalized stochastic liouville equation. Non-Markovian versus memory- less master equations, J. Stat. Phys.17, 171 (1977)

    1977

  8. [16]

    Chaturvedi and F

    S. Chaturvedi and F. Shibata, Time-convolutionless projection operator formalism for elimination of fast variables. Appli- cation to Brownian motion, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik B35, 297 (1979)

    1979

  9. [17]

    H. P. Breuer, K. Dietz, and M. Holthaus, The role of avoided crossings in the dynamics of strong laser field — matter inter- actions, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 8, 349 (1988)

    1988

  10. [18]

    H. P. Breuer, K. Dietz, and M. Holthaus, Strong laser fields interacting with matter I, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters10, 13 (1988)

    1988

  11. [19]

    Y . B. Zeldovich, The Quasienergy of a Quantum-mechanical System Subjected to a Periodic Action, Sov. Phys. JETP24, 1006 (1967)

    1967

  12. [20]

    J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schr ¨odinger Equation with a Hamiltonian Periodic in Time, Physical Review138, B979 (1965)

    1965

  13. [21]

    V . I. Ritus, Shift and Splitting of Atomic Energy Levels by the Field of an Electromagnetic Wave, Sov. Phys. JETP24, 1041 (1967)

    1967

  14. [22]

    Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum- Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Physical Review A 7, 2203 (1973)

    H. Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum- Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Physical Review A 7, 2203 (1973)

    1973

  15. [23]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically Driven Quantum Sys- tems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields, Physical Review X4, 031027 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 013001 (2015)

    M. Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 013001 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion, Progress of Theoretical Physics20, 948 (1958)

    S. Nakajima, On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion, Progress of Theoretical Physics20, 948 (1958)

    1958

  18. [26]

    Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility, the journal of chemical physics33, 1338 (1960)

    R. Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility, the journal of chemical physics33, 1338 (1960)

    1960

  19. [27]

    Clos and H.-P

    G. Clos and H.-P. Breuer, Quantification of memory effects in the spin-boson model, Phys. Rev. A86, 012115 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Haikka and S

    P. Haikka and S. Maniscalco, Non-markovian dynamics of a damped driven two-state system, Phys. Rev. A81, 052103 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Xie and W

    Q. Xie and W. Hai, Analytical results for a monochromatically driven two-level system, Phys. Rev. A82, 032117 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Schmidt, J

    H.-J. Schmidt, J. Schnack, and M. Holthaus, Floquet theory of the analytical solution of a periodically driven two-level system, Applicable Analysis100, 992 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Ma and S.-M

    T. Ma and S.-M. Li, Floquet system, bloch oscillation, and stark ladder (2007), arXiv:0711.1458

    2007 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Follia and B

    P. Follia and B. Vacchini, Analytical connection between exact and approximate solutions of the periodically driven two-level system starting from the heun equation (2026), arXiv:2607.01030 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open sys- tems, Physical Review Letters103, 210401 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    Hayashi,Quantum Information(Springer Berlin, 2010)

    M. Hayashi,Quantum Information(Springer Berlin, 2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    Megier, A

    N. Megier, A. Smirne, and B. Vacchini, Entropic bounds on information backflow, Physical Review Letters127, 030401 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Wißmann, A

    S. Wißmann, A. Karlsson, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H.-P. Breuer, Optimal state pairs for non-Markovian quantum dy- namics, Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics86, 062108 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Wißmann, H.-P

    S. Wißmann, H.-P. Breuer, and B. Vacchini, Generalized trace-distance measure connecting quantum and classical non- Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A92, 042108 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Grad, Asymptotic theory of the Boltzmann equation, Physics of Fluids6, 147 (1963)

    H. Grad, Asymptotic theory of the Boltzmann equation, Physics of Fluids6, 147 (1963)

    1963

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.