REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 123 references
About one in five infrared bow shocks around massive stars also lights up in H-alpha, and radiation pressure can help hold them up.
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · grok-4.5
2026-07-31 12:00 UTC pith:XIHFU45Y
load-bearing objection Solid first targeted Hα survey of IR bow shocks; detection stats and morphology offsets hold up, while the radiation-vs-wind classifications are only illustrative. the 3 major comments →
An Halpha survey of infrared bow-shocks around OB-type stars
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
A targeted H-alpha survey of 78 infrared bow-shock candidates around OB stars detects clear arc-shaped ionized nebulae in 15 objects (plus one serendipitous find). The H-alpha and mid-infrared morphologies trace the same large-scale structures, yet infrared arcs usually lie slightly closer to the star and appear broader. Several systems match radiation-supported bow shocks, bow waves, or dust waves; others remain consistent with classical wind-supported bow shocks. No clear link is found between H-alpha detection and stellar parameters.
What carries the argument
Morphological classification via stand-off distance: observed arc–star separations are compared with theoretical R0 values for wind-supported bow shocks, radiation-supported bow shocks, radiation-supported bow waves, and dust waves, using stellar luminosity, wind momentum efficiency, and adopted ambient ISM density ranges.
Load-bearing premise
The regime assigned to each bow rests on rough ambient-density ranges chosen from how the local H-alpha sky looks, plus mass-loss rates that can be badly overestimated for weaker-wind stars.
What would settle it
Optical spectroscopy that measures density, temperature, and kinematics of the H-alpha arcs, or independent ambient-density and mass-loss measurements that move the predicted stand-off distances out of the assigned regime.
If this is right
- Ionized-gas counterparts exist for a non-negligible fraction of infrared bow-shock candidates and can be imaged with modest ground-based facilities.
- Radiation pressure must be included alongside wind ram pressure when interpreting stand-off distances and deriving mass-loss rates from bow arcs.
- Objects dark in H-alpha are also generally dark at radio wavelengths in the small overlapping sample, suggesting a joint non-detection trend worth testing.
- Surface-brightness and emission-measure values supplied for ten detections give lower limits on expected thermal free–free emission at 6 GHz for radio follow-up.
- Some arcs may still be reflection nebulae; continuum or multi-line imaging is needed to confirm pure recombination emission.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If Vink mass-loss rates are systematically high, more of the sample will shift into radiation-supported regimes, raising the true fraction of radiation-supported bows.
- The systematic offset of infrared arcs inward of H-alpha arcs is a ready test of grain–gas decoupling models once multi-wavelength grain-size diagnostics exist.
- Weather-vane (externally driven) cases flagged by misaligned proper-motion vectors may dominate the HII-region subsample and should be separated before runaway statistics are drawn.
- A uniform deeper H-alpha campaign on the 28 non-detections could reveal whether the true detection rate is set by sensitivity or by genuinely dust-only waves.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The authors present the first targeted narrow-band Hα imaging survey of 78 infrared bow-shock candidates around OB-type stars, selected from the van Buren, Brown & Bomans, E-BOSS, and Kobulnicky catalogues and observed with five ground-based facilities, complemented by archival Spitzer/WISE imaging. They report clear arc-shaped Hα nebulae in 15 objects plus one serendipitous detection (N1), diffuse background emission in 35, and non-detections in 28. For the 16 detections they measure arc geometry (stand-off distance R0, width, length, eccentricity) in both Hα and MIR, finding IR arcs systematically closer to the star and broader than the Hα arcs, only partly attributable to resolution differences. For ten objects they derive SHASSA-calibrated Hα surface brightnesses, emission measures, EM-based ISM density estimates, and predicted 6 GHz free-free brightnesses. Finally, they classify the bows into the Henney & Arthur (2019) regimes (WBS/RBS/RBW/DW) by comparing measured stand-off distances to theoretical predictions over adopted ISM density ranges, concluding that both wind momentum and radiation pressure can support these structures.
Significance. This is the first targeted Hα imaging survey of infrared bow-shock candidates around OB stars, and it fills a genuine observational gap: prior optical work rested on shallow all-sky data (SHASSA/VTSS). The paper's strengths are concrete and useful to the community: a homogeneous 78-target sample drawn from the major IR catalogues; measured arc geometries in both Hα and MIR with repeated-fit uncertainties (Table 2); SHASSA-cross-calibrated surface brightnesses with a fully documented procedure and conservative error budget (Appendix C); EM-based density estimates; and predicted 6 GHz free-free brightnesses that provide directly falsifiable targets for radio follow-up (the ζ Oph prediction of ~10 kJy/sr is consistent with the published non-detection, a nice sanity check). The authors are commendably transparent about the reflection-nebula ambiguity for five detections and about the Vink mass-loss overestimate. If the regime classifications were made robust, the conclusion that radiation pressure can contribute to supporting some of these structures would be a meaningful addition to the Henney & Arthur framework's observational tests.
major comments (3)
- [§4.3 and Table 4, cols. 10–15] The WBS/RBS/RBW/DW assignments rest on adopted n_ISM bins of 0.1–5 and 1–100 cm^-3. Since both the R1 (Eq. 5) and WBS limits scale as R0 ∝ n_ISM^(-1/2), each regime's predicted R0 band spans a factor of ~7–10, and adjacent bands overlap or nearly tile the plausible R0 axis (e.g., EB01: RBS 13.98–1.98 pc vs WBS 3.19–0.45 pc). The comparison therefore has limited discriminatory power: most measured R0 values fall inside at least one regime's range, and several rows receive dual labels (RBS/WBS, DW/WBS). Since the second half of the central claim (radiation pressure contributing to support) rests on these assignments, the authors should quantify the robustness: e.g., report for how many objects the class is invariant across the full density bin, and state explicitly how many of the 'radiation-supported' assignments would change if the bins were narrowed using the EM-derived densities of Tab
- [§4.3, paragraph following the adopted density ranges] When measured R0 falls outside all predicted ranges, the class is assigned by 'the nearest higher theoretical value.' Two asymmetries make this rule non-neutral: (i) observed R0 is a projected lower limit (Tarango-Yong & Henney 2018), so a mismatch preferentially indicates a too-small prediction; (ii) WBS predictions are computed with Vink et al. (2001) mass-loss rates, which the authors themselves note can overestimate Ṁ by up to two orders of magnitude for late-O/B dwarfs (their own ζ Oph/EB21 example drops the WBS prediction from 4.10–0.48 to 0.33–0.05 pc). Because WBS predictions are thus upper envelopes while RBS/DW predictions are largely Ṁ-independent, the fallback rule can systematically funnel ambiguous cases into radiation-supported classes. The authors should either justify the rule with a worked sensitivity test (recompute Table 4 with clumping-corrected Ṁ for the late-O/B dw
- [§3.1, §5 (DSS2 paragraph), abstract, and Table 2/Table 4] Five of the sixteen detections (K065, K692, BB1, N1, EB23; plus EB21 unassessable due to saturation) cannot be distinguished from reflection nebulae or strong [O III] emission with the present data, as the authors candidly state. However, the abstract and §6 report 'clear arc-shaped Hα nebulae are detected in 15 objects' without this caveat, and Table 2/Table 4 do not flag the unconfirmed subset. Since the detection fraction is a headline result, the unconfirmed objects should be marked in the tables and the abstract/conclusions should state the confirmed fraction (10/78) separately from the candidate fraction (16/78).
minor comments (8)
- [§4.3, after Eq. (8)] The text following Eq. (8) contains a sentence fragment: '...and needed to cover all cases from optically thin to optically thick shells.' Please rephrase.
- [Table 2] R0 uncertainties are quoted as one pixel, yet several entries imply much higher precision (e.g., EB21 Hα R0 = 290.567″ on SBT images with 3.14″/pixel; EB06 R0 = 790.30″). Values should be rounded consistently with the stated uncertainty.
- [§5 (ζ Oph paragraph) vs Table 1] For ζ Oph the text quotes the Gvaramadze et al. (2012) distance of 112 pc, while Table 1 adopts 0.13 ± 0.01 kpc. Please reconcile or note the difference, since derived physical sizes are quoted to two decimals.
- [§4.2, Eq. (4)] The notation ν^(-0.1)_GHz is ambiguous; please write the frequency dependence explicitly (e.g., (ν/GHz)^(-0.1)).
- [various] Typos: 'bow-schock' (§5, λ Cep paragraph); 'allsky' (§2); 'comprises of' (§2); 'discernable' (§3.1); 'laying' (§4.2).
- [§5, Fig. 5 discussion] Binary fractions (~58% of 13 objects; ~26% of 19) are quoted without uncertainties. Given the small samples, these are consistent with a wide range; either add binomial errors or soften the comparison between subsamples.
- [§4.3, definition of κ] κ = 600 cm² g⁻¹ is described as 'total opacity (gas plus dust)'; since τ1 enters Eq. (8) and the regime boundaries, please state explicitly that this is a UV-band opacity and comment on its uncertainty (~factor 2), which translates directly into τ1.
- [§5 and references] The two 'Van den Eijnden et al. 2022' papers (MNRAS 510, 515 and MNRAS 512, 5374) are cited with different capitalization ('Van den' vs 'van den'); please make the in-text citation style consistent so they are distinguishable (2022a/b).
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: observational survey with independent measurements compared post hoc to external theory.
full rationale
The paper is a targeted Hα imaging survey. Detection statistics, geometrical parameters (R0, w, l, e), and Hα–IR morphology comparisons are direct measurements from new and archival images, not derived from the quantities they are said to support. The WBS/RBS/RBW/DW classifications in §4.3/Table 4 apply the external Henney & Arthur (2019a,b,c) stand-off formulae (Eqs. 5–8) using literature stellar/wind parameters and broad, pre-chosen ISM density bins (0.1–5 or 1–100 cm⁻³) motivated by local Hα appearance and standard ISM phases; observed R0 is then compared after the fact. No parameter is fitted to the stand-off data and re-labeled a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the present authors, and no self-citation carries the central claim. Weaknesses noted by a skeptic (wide density bins, ‘nearest higher’ fallback, Vink Ṁ overestimates) affect discriminatory power and robustness of the radiation-support interpretation, but they are not circularity: the comparison is not true by construction. Score 0 is appropriate.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (3)
- n_ISM density ranges =
0.1–5 or 1–100 cm⁻³
- dust–gas opacity κ =
600 cm² g⁻¹
- effective path length l_eff ≈ w =
l_eff ~ w
axioms (5)
- domain assumption Case-B recombination at Te = 10^4 K converts Hα surface brightness to emission measure via EM ≃ 2.75 I_Hα
- domain assumption Strong-shock compression factor ne ≈ 4 n_ISM
- domain assumption Vink et al. (2001) mass-loss prescription supplies Ṁ for η_w
- domain assumption Henney & Arthur (2019a,b) analytic regimes (WBS/RBS/RBW/DW) correctly map observed R0 onto physical support mechanism
- domain assumption Observed (projected) stand-off distance is a lower limit to the true R0
read the original abstract
Bow shocks (BSs) around massive stars are commonly identified in mid-infrared (MIR) surveys. In contrast, systematic optical investigations of these structures remain scarce with only a few possible detections reported so far. We performed a targeted Halpha imaging survey of 78 IR BS candidates compiled from literature catalogues. Observations were obtained with multiple ground-based facilities and complemented with archival MIR images from Spitzer and WISE. For the detected bow structures, geometrical parameters were measured, and the bows were classified based on the parameters of their central stars, the measured stand-off distances and adopted plausible ISM conditions Clear arc-shaped Halpha nebulae are detected in 15 objects, with one additional BS discovered serendipitously. A further 35 objects exhibit diffuse Halpha emission associated with complex background structures, while 28 show no detectable Halpha emission. The Halpha and IR morphologies generally trace the same large-scale structures, although most of the IR arcs lie slightly closer to the star and appear broader than their optical counterparts. We find that several systems are consistent with radiation-supported BSs, bow waves or dust waves, while others remain compatible with classical wind-supported BSs. This survey demonstrates that a fraction of IR BS candidates around OB stars also exhibit detectable ionised gas structures in Halpha, and both stellar wind momentum and radiation pressure can contribute to shaping these structures. No correlation is found between the detection of an Halpha BS and the stellar parameters, and the overlap in objects observed in Halpha and in the radio regime was too small for firm conclusions. Future spectroscopic observations will be required to determine the physical conditions and kinematics of the ionised gas and to further constrain the nature of these BS systems.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Identifying bow shocks with H allsky surveys
To see or not to see a bow shock. Identifying bow shocks with H allsky surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041054 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505098 , primaryClass =
-
[2]
A Robotic Wide-Angle H Survey of the Southern Sky. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/323969 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0108518 , primaryClass =
-
[3]
The enigmatic nature of the circumstellar envelope and bow shock surrounding Betelgeuse as revealed by Herschel. I. Evidence of clumps, multiple arcs, and a linear bar-like structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219792 , archivePrefix =. 1212.4870 , primaryClass =
-
[4]
Interstellar Weather Vanes: GLIMPSE Mid-Infrared Stellar Wind Bow Shocks in M17 and RCW 49. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/592565 , archivePrefix =. 0808.2168 , primaryClass =
-
[5]
Infrared Photometric Properties of 709 Candidate Stellar Bowshock Nebulae. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa90ba , archivePrefix =. 1710.07892 , primaryClass =
-
[6]
The infrared dust bubble N22: an expanding H ii region and the star formation around it. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201218861 , archivePrefix =. 1206.2762 , primaryClass =
-
[7]
Demonstration of a Novel Method for Measuring Mass-loss Rates for Massive Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab3e0 , archivePrefix =. 1803.02794 , primaryClass =
-
[8]
A Comprehensive Search for Stellar Bowshock Nebulae in the Milky Way: A Catalog of 709 Mid-infrared Selected Candidates. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/227/2/18 , archivePrefix =. 1609.02204 , primaryClass =
-
[9]
E-BOSS: An Extensive stellar BOw Shock Survey. II. Catalogue second release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424676 , archivePrefix =. 1504.04264 , primaryClass =
-
[10]
Wind bubbles within H ii regions around slowly moving stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424716 , archivePrefix =. 1410.0019 , primaryClass =
-
[11]
Models of the circumstellar medium of evolving, massive runaway stars moving through the Galactic plane. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1629 , archivePrefix =. 1408.2828 , primaryClass =
-
[12]
An IRAS/ISSA Survey of Bow Shocks Around Runaway Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/117739 , adsurl =
-
[13]
Bow Shocks and Bubbles Are Seen around Hot Stars by IRAS. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/185184 , adsurl =
-
[14]
E-BOSS: an Extensive stellar BOw Shock Survey. I. Methods and first catalogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118116 , archivePrefix =. 1109.3689 , primaryClass =
-
[15]
, year = 1997, month = feb, volume =
Bow Shocks Around Runaway Stars.III.The High Resolution Maps. , year = 1997, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1086/118298 , adsurl =
-
[16]
Identifying birth places of young isolated neutron stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16093.x , archivePrefix =. 0911.4441 , primaryClass =
arXiv 2009
-
[17]
Bow shocks, bow waves, and dust waves - I. Strong coupling limit. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1043 , archivePrefix =. 1903.03737 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903
-
[18]
Bow shocks, bow waves, and dust waves - II. Beyond the rip point. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1130 , archivePrefix =. 1903.07774 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903
-
[19]
Nonequilibrium Photodissociation Regions: Ionization-Dissociation Fronts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/176805 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9508067 , primaryClass =
-
[20]
The Spitzer Space Telescope Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422992 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406223 , primaryClass =
-
[21]
The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , archivePrefix =. 1008.0031 , primaryClass =
-
[22]
The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) for the Spitzer Space Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422843 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405616 , primaryClass =
-
[23]
The Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS). , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422717 , adsurl =
-
[24]
The surrounding interstellar medium , author=
Sh2-205--I. The surrounding interstellar medium , author=. , volume=. 2008 , publisher=
2008
-
[25]
The VLT-FLAMES survey of massive stars: evolution of surface N abundances and effective temperature scales in the Galaxy and Magellanic Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077838 , archivePrefix =. 0706.1731 , primaryClass =
-
[26]
Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M _ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 , archivePrefix =. 1110.5049 , primaryClass =
-
[27]
Bright OB stars in the Galaxy. IV. Stellar and wind parameters of early to late B supergiants. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077919 , archivePrefix =. 0711.1110 , primaryClass =
-
[28]
A new calibration of stellar parameters of Galactic O stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042386 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0503346 , primaryClass =
-
[29]
The Astrophysical Journal , volume=
A new investigation of the binary HD 48099 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2009 , publisher=
2009
-
[30]
A targeted radio survey of infrared-selected bow shock candidates. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557036 , archivePrefix =. 2510.23470 , primaryClass =
-
[31]
, volume=
On the observability of bow shocks of Galactic runaway OB stars , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=
2016
-
[32]
2011 , publisher=
Physics of the interstellar and intergalactic medium , author=. 2011 , publisher=
2011
-
[33]
A Galactic O Star Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/381380 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0311196 , primaryClass =
-
[34]
Runaway stars and pulsars ejected from the nearby young stellar groups , author=
On the origin of the O and B-type stars with high velocities-II. Runaway stars and pulsars ejected from the nearby young stellar groups , author=. , volume=. 2001 , publisher=
2001
-
[35]
The initial mass function for massive stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/160548 , adsurl =
-
[36]
, year = 1974, month = nov, volume =
A catalogue of galactic O stars and the ionization of the low density interstellar medium by runaway stars. , year = 1974, month = nov, volume =
1974
-
[37]
Kinematics, close binary evolution, and ages of the O stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/157311 , adsurl =
-
[38]
Fundamental Parameters for Central Stars of 103 Infrared Bow Shock Nebulae. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade22f , archivePrefix =. 2506.07904 , primaryClass =
-
[39]
Computing the Dust Distribution in the Bow Shock of a Fast-moving, Evolved Star. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/734/2/L26 , archivePrefix =. 1105.2387 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[40]
2006 , publisher=
Astrophysics Of Gas Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei , author=. 2006 , publisher=
2006
-
[41]
, volume=
Detection of nonthermal emission from the bow shock of a massive runaway star , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=
2010
-
[42]
, volume=
High-sensitivity radio study of the non-thermal stellar bow shock EB27 , author=. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=
2021
-
[43]
Radio detections of IR-selected runaway stellar bow shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac823 , archivePrefix =. 2203.10842 , primaryClass =
-
[44]
Oph and the weak-wind problem. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01343.x , archivePrefix =. 1209.0455 , primaryClass =
arXiv 2012
-
[45]
Bow shocks, bow waves, and dust waves - III. Diagnostics. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2283 , archivePrefix =. 1904.00343 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904
-
[46]
Introduction to Stellar Winds
-
[47]
Soviet Physics Doklady , year = 1971, month = mar, volume =
A Model of the Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Interstellar Medium. Soviet Physics Doklady , year = 1971, month = mar, volume =
1971
-
[48]
Modeling Nonaxisymmetric Bow Shocks: Solution Method and Exact Analytic Solutions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/308576 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0003389 , primaryClass =
-
[49]
Exact Analytic Solutions for Stellar Wind Bow Shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/309939 , adsurl =
-
[50]
3D simulations of Betelgeuse's bow shock. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118002 , archivePrefix =. 1109.1555 , primaryClass =
-
[51]
Modelling multiwavelength observational characteristics of bow shocks from runaway early-type stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2632 , archivePrefix =. 1511.03059 , primaryClass =
-
[52]
Detecting stellar-wind bubbles through infrared arcs in H II regions. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527569 , archivePrefix =. 1512.06857 , primaryClass =
-
[53]
Thermal emission from bow shocks. I. 2D hydrodynamic models of the Bubble Nebula. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834832 , archivePrefix =. 1903.05505 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903
-
[54]
Bow shock nebulae of hot massive stars in a magnetized medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2537 , archivePrefix =. 1610.00543 , primaryClass =
-
[55]
3D MHD astrospheres: applications to IRC-10414 and Betelgeuse. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2026 , archivePrefix =. 2107.05513 , primaryClass =
-
[56]
PION: simulating bow shocks and circumstellar nebulae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab781 , archivePrefix =. 2103.07555 , primaryClass =
-
[57]
Blowing in the wind: The dust wave around Orionis AB. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322873 , archivePrefix =. 1401.7185 , primaryClass =
-
[58]
Radiation-pressure-driven dust waves inside bursting interstellar bubbles. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423545 , archivePrefix =. 1404.2807 , primaryClass =
-
[59]
A bimodal dust grain distribution in the IC 434 H ii region. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424799 , archivePrefix =. 1501.02256 , primaryClass =
-
[60]
Thermal emission from bow shocks. II. 3D magnetohydrodynamic models of Ophiuchi. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243531 , archivePrefix =. 2203.06331 , primaryClass =
-
[61]
Discovery of two distorted interstellar bubbles. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/157137 , adsurl =
-
[62]
Searching for Faint X-Ray Emission from Galactic Stellar Wind Bow Shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1073 , archivePrefix =. 1903.06279 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903
-
[63]
X-ray study of bow shocks in runaway stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1826 , archivePrefix =. 1708.04082 , primaryClass =
-
[64]
AE Aurigae: First Detection of Non-thermal X-Ray Emission from a Bow Shock Produced by a Runaway Star. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/757/1/L6 , archivePrefix =. 1208.6511 , primaryClass =
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041
-
[65]
Instrumentation in astronomy VI , year = 1986, editor =
The IRAF Data Reduction and Analysis System. Instrumentation in astronomy VI , year = 1986, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.968154 , adsurl =
-
[66]
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II , year = 1993, editor =
IRAF in the Nineties. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II , year = 1993, editor =
1993
-
[67]
Astronomische Nachrichten , year = 2019, month = aug, volume =
Small Binocular Telescope: The new epoch of Burst Alert Robotic Telescope. Astronomische Nachrichten , year = 2019, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1002/asna.201913668 , adsurl =
-
[68]
An astrosphere around the blue supergiant Cas: possible explanation of its filamentary structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2488 , archivePrefix =. 1709.09494 , primaryClass =
-
[69]
Search for Diffuse X-Rays from the Bow Shock Region of Runaway Star BD +43 3654 with Suzaku. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/64.6.138 , archivePrefix =. 1207.5577 , primaryClass =
-
[70]
The Case of Oph and BD+43 3654
X-Ray Observations of Bow Shocks around Runaway O Stars. The Case of Oph and BD+43 3654. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/79 , archivePrefix =. 1602.07805 , primaryClass =
-
[71]
Particle acceleration at the bow shock of runaway star LS 2355: non-thermal radio emission but no -ray counterpart. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1622 , archivePrefix =. 2407.00380 , primaryClass =
-
[72]
MeerKAT discovery of radio emission from the Vela X-1 bow shock. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3395 , archivePrefix =. 2111.10159 , primaryClass =
-
[73]
Galactic runaway O and Be stars found using Gaia DR3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346613 , archivePrefix =. 2311.01827 , primaryClass =
-
[74]
New stellar bow shocks and bubbles found around runaway stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451336 , archivePrefix =. 2502.02658 , primaryClass =
-
[75]
And then they were two: Detection of non-thermal radio emission from the bow shocks of two runaway stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243098 , archivePrefix =. 2204.11913 , primaryClass =
-
[77]
Radio Polarization from Runaway Star Bowshocks. I. The General Case. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adae0a , archivePrefix =. 2505.06777 , primaryClass =
-
[78]
Variable diffuse X-ray emission from stellar-wind bow shocks driven by dynamical instabilities
Thermal emission from bow shocks: III. Variable diffuse X-ray emission from stellar-wind bow shocks driven by dynamical instabilities. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553722 , archivePrefix =. 2501.06021 , primaryClass =
-
[79]
Search for OB stars running away from young star clusters. I. NGC 6611. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810411 , archivePrefix =. 0809.0650 , primaryClass =
-
[80]
IRC -10414: a bow-shock-producing red supergiant star. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1943 , archivePrefix =. 1310.2245 , primaryClass =
-
[81]
Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078357 , archivePrefix =. 0708.1752 , primaryClass =
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.