Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 85 references

Quantum Teleportation toward the Quantum Internet: A Concise Review

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that a global quantum internet will be built on quantum repeaters—teleportation plus entanglement swapping plus quantum memory—and that each building block has now been demonstrated experimentally.

desk verdict A competent and current review—useful as an entry point, but it is an organized survey rather than a critical map, and the repeater claims run ahead of the cited experiments. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25395 v1 pith:T5X6TIPL submitted 2026-07-28 quant-ph

Yang-Bin Ma , Yun-Ru Fan , Ri-Yao Song , Ya-Zhou Zhao , Yi-Ye Liu , Si Shen , Zi-Hao Zhan , Yan-Yu Wei
show 3 more authors
Kai Guo Guang-Can Guo Qiang Zhou
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumteleportationentanglementswappingrepeatermemoryinternetnetworkBellstatemeasurementopticalfibrecommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The review's central assertion is that quantum repeaters, built on quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping, are the most promising route to a global-scale quantum internet. It claims that every essential primitive—teleporting unknown quantum states, swapping entanglement between particles that never interacted, storing entanglement in quantum memories, and performing feed-forward correction—has been demonstrated experimentally across photonic, atomic, ion, ensemble, and solid-state platforms. The aim is to show that the field has moved from proof-of-principle to metropolitan-scale, free-space, satellite, and chip-integrated demonstrations. If the review's reading is right, the quantum internet no longer needs a new physics principle; it needs engineering of rates, memory lifetimes, multiplexing, and cascaded links.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the quantum repeater architecture. A long channel is split into elementary links; each link establishes and stores entanglement between two quantum memories. A Bell state measurement (BSM)—a joint projective measurement on two qubits in one of the four Bell states—performs entanglement swapping at intermediate stations, projecting two particles that have never directly interacted into an entangled state. Heralding and classical communication let the entanglement be extended link by link. Quantum teleportation itself transfers an unknown quantum state from a sender's qubit to a distant receiver's qubit using pre-shared entanglement, a BSM, and a classical feed-fo

What would settle it

A head-to-head audit of the cited experiments using identical metrics—end-to-end teleportation fidelity, entanglement generation rate, memory lifetime, multiplexing overhead—showing that no single platform simultaneously meets the thresholds needed for a three-hop cascaded repeater would undercut the claim. More directly, a deployed three-link repeater network that fails to beat direct fibre transmission over the same total distance for the same photon budget would falsify the 'most promising approach' assessment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quantum teleportation, together with its extension to entangled states (entanglement swapping), is the universal mechanism for moving quantum information between nodes without transmitting the information-carrying particle, and that quantum repeater architectures built on these two operations are the most promising approach to a global-scale quantum internet. It surveys representative experiments—free-space links beyond 100 km, fibre links beyond 100 km, satellite-based uplinks, and memory-based nodes in atoms, trapped ions, atomic ensembles, diamond colour centres, and rare-earth crystals—to argue that each component of a working repeater has been individua

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes the cited experimental reports are accurate and representative enough that components demonstrated on spooled or short deployed fibres will work when cascaded into a real multihop network, without providing an apples-to-apples comparison of rates, fidelities, memory lifetimes, or a disclosed selection protocol.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the repeater route is right, long-distance quantum communication no longer requires lossless channels; it requires reliable entanglement distribution and memory, and both have been shown in controlled settings.
  • Metropolitan fibre links and free-space links already support teleportation above the classical fidelity limit, and some memory lifetimes now exceed entanglement-generation times, satisfying the event-ready condition for a repeater.
  • Satellite-based entanglement distribution extends the same protocol to intercontinental distances, making a global-scale network geographically plausible.
  • Coexistence of quantum signals with classical optical communication in the same fibre, demonstrated in one cited experiment, would allow a quantum internet to ride on existing telecom infrastructure and cut deployment cost.
  • Chip-integrated entangled-photon sources and switching, demonstrated in recent experiments, point toward scalable and low-cost network nodes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The survey implicitly predicts that no single memory platform will dominate: nearly every long-distance experiment uses quantum frequency conversion to connect a memory's native wavelength to the telecom band, so heterogeneous, hybrid networks joined by frequency converters are the near-term form a quantum internet is likely to take.
  • Rates, fidelities, memory lifetimes, and multiplexing overhead are reported in incompatible units across experiments; an apples-to-apples benchmarking standard would make the review's qualitative ranking of platforms testable.
  • The 100-km milestones are mostly single elementary links; the decisive test for the repeater claim is a deployed, cascaded three-link network with end-to-end entanglement, which the review lists as future work rather than demonstrated fact.
  • The forward-looking list of rate boosters (multiplexing, hyperentanglement, high-dimensional encoding, improved BSMs) implies that single-photon collection and detection efficiency, not raw channel loss, will be the dominant engineering bottleneck in deployed networks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review surveys quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping as the core building blocks for quantum networks and, ultimately, a quantum internet. It reproduces the standard Bennett teleportation protocol and its extension to entanglement swapping, classifies six single-link network architectures, describes the quantum-repeater concept, and then summarizes representative experiments across photonic free-space/fiber systems, single atoms, trapped ions, atomic ensembles, NV centers, and absorptive quantum memories. The stated thesis is that teleportation-based repeater schemes are the most promising route to long-distance quantum communication and that the necessary components have been demonstrated on multiple platforms. Section 7 explicitly acknowledges that large-scale, cascadable quantum repeater networks remain open.

Significance. If the claims are taken at face value, the review is a useful and reasonably current synthesis of experimental work through 2025-2026. Its protocol equations in Sections 2-3 are standard and structurally correct, and the cited experiments are real publications with reported fidelities and rates. The paper's main value is as an entry point for non-specialists: it collects results across very different platforms and gives the reader a compact map of the field. It does not provide new technical analysis, nor does it offer an apples-to-apples benchmark of rates, fidelities, memory lifetimes, or multiplexing overheads across platforms. The main weaknesses are interpretive: in several places single elementary-link demonstrations are described as 'quantum repeater' demonstrations, and one architectural comparison is internally inconsistent. These issues are fixable and do not undermine the standard protocol content.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, sixth architecture (Fig. 2(f)) vs §4 [53]] The text states that in the sixth architecture, where state preparation, BSM, and entanglement generation all occur at Alice's node, 'the teleportation distance remains limited to the laboratory scale' and that the architecture offers only minor improvement over direct qubit transmission. This directly contradicts Section 4's summary of ref. [53] as ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation over 500-1400 km, and ref. [53] is cited as the example of that architecture. Please clarify whether 'teleportation distance' means the Alice-to-Bob distance or the source-to-BSM separation, and revise the architectural comparison accordingly.
  2. [§6 [158] vs §3, Fig. 3] The review describes Zhu et al. [158] as 'the first metropolitan-scale quantum repeater to certify Bell nonlocality.' The experiment as described, however, is heralded entanglement between two solid-state quantum memories separated by 14.5 km through a single central BSM: one elementary link, not a concatenated repeater chain. Section 3 (Figure 3) defines a quantum repeater as requiring multiple elementary links connected by multiple rounds of entanglement swapping. Similar loose terminology is applied to [117], [130], [131]. Please replace 'repeater' with 'elementary repeater link' or 'building block' where appropriate, and state explicitly that no cascaded multi-link repeater has been demonstrated; Section 7 already concedes this.
  3. [§7 and Abstract] The abstract and concluding sections frame the reviewed experiments as progress 'toward a scalable and practical quantum internet,' but the manuscript does not quantitatively compare the cited demonstrations on the metrics that matter for repeaters (entanglement generation rate per link, memory coherence time, multiplexing gain, end-to-end fidelity after multiple swaps). The qualitative claim that component demonstrations exist is defensible, but the stronger inference that these components form a 'roadmap' for a working internet-scale repeater should be explicitly labeled as extrapolation based on single elementary links.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References, [83]] Reference [83] (Zhao, Wu & Zhang, Chinese Physics B 18, 1749) is an entropy-of-black-string paper and appears unrelated to the 'prior entanglement distribution' context in Section 4. This is likely a citation error and should be corrected.
  2. [§6 [158]] The 'first metropolitan-scale quantum repeater' claim is based on an arXiv preprint. If it is used as a milestone, its unpublished status should be noted, or a peer-reviewed version should be cited.
  3. [§4-§6 general] The review describes the selected experiments as 'representative' but does not disclose the selection criteria. Given that the review's narrative is one of steady progress, a sentence explaining the inclusion/exclusion logic (or softening 'representative' to 'selected examples') would improve transparency.
  4. [Eqs. (3)-(4)] The typesetting of Equations (3) and (4) obscures the signs and coefficients of the Bell-state decompositions. Please ensure the final version renders these correctly; the underlying standard identities appear intended correctly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a literature review with no derivation-to-input loop; the few self-citations are external experimental reports, not load-bearing definitions or uniqueness claims.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation paper. Its central statements—that quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping are building blocks for quantum repeaters, and that repeaters are the most promising route to a quantum internet—are supported by citing independent experimental papers and established reviews (e.g., refs. 1, 2, 18, 19, 59). The standard teleportation equations in Section 2 are textbook formalism reproduced from Bennett et al. (ref. 1), not derived from the paper's own claims. The only self-citations, such as ref. [49] ('the author's group'), describe published experimental demonstrations and are not used to define or prove the central review claim. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The skeptical objection that single-link metropolitan demonstrations do not yet constitute a cascaded repeater network is a concern about extrapolation and evidence strength, not circular reasoning; the paper itself concedes in Section 7 that 'large-scale, cascadable quantum repeater networks' still face significant technical challenges. Accordingly, the review is self-contained as a literature digest and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review makes no new calculation or measurement. Its only inputs are standard quantum-information facts and the cited experimental record; no free parameters or invented entities appear.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard quantum teleportation protocol (Bennett et al. 1993) is a valid description of state transfer using an entangled pair and classical communication.
    Used throughout Section 2 as the foundation of the review; no new derivation is offered.
  • standard math No-Cloning theorem prevents direct amplification of unknown quantum states.
    Invoked in Section 2 to justify why quantum repeaters must use entanglement rather than classical amplifiers.
  • domain assumption The cited experimental papers correctly reported their fidelities, rates, and distances.
    The review's progress narrative rests entirely on third-party measurements it does not re-analyze; e.g., refs. [49], [50], [85], [117], [130], [158] in Sections 4-6.
  • domain assumption Quantum repeater architectures reduce channel loss from exponential to polynomial scaling.
    Stated in Section 3 as a justification for repeaters; it is asserted rather than proven in this manuscript and is taken from prior literature [19,59].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Teleportation toward the Quantum Internet: A Concise Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T5X6TIPL

@misc{pith2026260725395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Teleportation toward the Quantum Internet: A Concise Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T5X6TIPL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25395}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum networks play a pivotal role in quantum information science, which not only provide a secure communication platform for remote access to quantum computers but also serve as the strategic core for achieving large-scale quantum information processing, forming the foundational infrastructure for the future global-scale quantum internet. Quantum teleportation, which enables the transmission of unknown quantum states over long distances by employing quantum entanglement together with classical communication, is essential for the distribution of quantum resources in the construction of the global-scale quantum internet. To realize a global-scale quantum internet, quantum repeater protocols represent one of the most promising approaches for enabling quantum communication between any nodes. This concise review presents representative experimental demonstrations of quantum teleportation for constructing quantum networks across different physical platforms. Along this trajectory, the review discusses current challenges, open issues, and future perspectives toward scalable and practical quantum internet.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [83]

    Entropyofarotatingandchargedblackstringto allordersinthePlancklength

    R.Zhao,Y.Q.Wu,andL.C.Zhang."Entropyofarotatingandchargedblackstringto allordersinthePlancklength." Chinese Physics B18,no.5(2009):1749. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/18/5/006

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/18/5/006 2009

  2. [53]

    Ground-to-satellitequantumteleportation

    J.G.Ren,P.Xu,H.L.Yong,etal."Ground-to-satellitequantumteleportation." Nature 549,no.7670(2017):70-73.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23675

    doi:10.1038/nature23675 2017

  3. [1]

    TeleportinganunknownquantumstateviadualclassicalandEinstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels

    C.H.Bennett,G.Brassard,C.Crepeau,R.Jozsa,A.Peres,andW.K.Wootters. "TeleportinganunknownquantumstateviadualclassicalandEinstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels." Physical Review Letters70,no.13(1993):1895-1899. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 1993

  4. [2]

    Experimentalquantumteleportation

    D.Bouwmeester,J.W.Pan,K.Mattle,M.Eibl,H.Weinfurter,andA.Zeilinger. "Experimentalquantumteleportation." Nature390,no.6660(1997):575-579. https://doi.org/10.1038/37539

    doi:10.1038/37539 1997

  5. [3]

    Quantumnetworktheory

    B.YurkeandJ.S.Denker."Quantumnetworktheory." Physical Review A29,no.3 (1984):1419.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.29.1419

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.29.1419 1984

  6. [4]

    Thequantuminternet

    H.J.Kimble."Thequantuminternet." Nature453,no.7198(2008):1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07127

    doi:10.1038/nature07127 2008

  7. [5]

    Towardsreal-worldquantumnetworks:a review

    S.H.Wei,B.Jing,X.Y.Zhang,etal."Towardsreal-worldquantumnetworks:a review." Laser & Photonics Reviews16,no.3(2022):2100219. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100219

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202100219 2022

  8. [6]

    QuantumStateTransferand EntanglementDistributionamongDistantNodesinaQuantumNetwork

    J.I.Cirac,P.Zoller,H.J.Kimble,andH.Mabuchi."QuantumStateTransferand EntanglementDistributionamongDistantNodesinaQuantumNetwork." Physical 28 Review Letters78,no.16(1997):3221-3224. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3221

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 1997

Show all 85 references
  1. [7]

    Quantumcommunication

    N.GisinandR.Thew."Quantumcommunication." Nature Photon1,no.3(2007):165- 171.https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.22

    2007 doi

  2. [8]

    Quantumcommunicationtechnology

    N.GisinandR.T.Thew."Quantumcommunicationtechnology." Electronics Letters46, no.14(2010):965-967.https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2010.1626

    2010

  3. [9]

    Long-distancequantum communicationwithatomicensemblesandlinearoptics

    L.M.Duan,M.D.Lukin,J.I.Cirac,andP.Zoller."Long-distancequantum communicationwithatomicensemblesandlinearoptics." Nature414,no.6862(2001): 413-418.https://doi.org/10.1038/35106500

    2001 doi

  4. [10]

    Quantumsensing

    C.L.Degen,F.Reinhard,andP.Cappellaro."Quantumsensing." Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017):035002.https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    2017 doi

  5. [11]

    Distributedquantumsensing

    Z.S.ZhangandQ.T.Zhuang."Distributedquantumsensing." Quantum Science and Technology6,no.4(2021):043001.https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abd4c3

    2021 doi

  6. [12]

    QuantumComputation

    D.P.DiVincenzo."QuantumComputation." Science270,no.5234(1995):255-261. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5234.255

    1995 doi

  7. [13]

    Distributedquantumcomputingacrossan opticalnetworklink

    D.Main,P.Drmota,D.P.Nadlinger,etal."Distributedquantumcomputingacrossan opticalnetworklink." Nature638,no.8050(2025):383-388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08404-x

    2025 doi

  8. [14]

    Advancesin quantumteleportation

    S.Pirandola,J.Eisert,C.Weedbrook,A.Furusawa,andS.L.Braunstein."Advancesin quantumteleportation." Nature Photonics9,no.10(2015):641-652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.154

    2015 doi

  9. [15]

    Progressinquantum teleportation

    X.M.Hu,Y.Guo,B.H.Liu,C.F.Li,andG.C.Guo."Progressinquantum teleportation." Nature Reviews Physics5,no.6(2023):339-353. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00588-x

    2023 doi

  10. [16]

    Deterministicquantumteleportationthrough fiberchannels

    M.R.Huo,J.L.Qin,J.L.Cheng,etal."Deterministicquantumteleportationthrough fiberchannels." Science Advances4,no.10(2018):eaas9401. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aas9401

    2018 doi

  11. [17]

    Deterministicandmultiuserquantumteleportation networkofcontinuous-variablepolarizationstates

    J.L.Yan,X.Y.Zhou,Y.Qin,etal."Deterministicandmultiuserquantumteleportation networkofcontinuous-variablepolarizationstates." Physical Review Research6,no.3 (2024):L032062.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032062

    2024 doi

  12. [18]

    Event-ready-detectors

    M.Zukowski,A.Zeilinger,M.A.Horne,andA.K.Ekert."Event-ready-detectors"Bell experimentviaentanglementswapping." Physical Review Letters71,no.26(1993): 4287-4290.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.4287. 29

    1993 doi

  13. [19]

    Quantumrepeaters:Fromquantum networkstothequantuminternet

    K.Azuma,S.E.Economou,D.Elkouss,etal."Quantumrepeaters:Fromquantum networkstothequantuminternet." Reviews of Modern Physics95,no.4(2023):045006. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045006

    2023 doi

  14. [20]

    Deterministicteleportationofaquantum gatebetweentwologicalqubits

    K.S.Chou,J.Z.Blumoff,C.S.Wang,etal."Deterministicteleportationofaquantum gatebetweentwologicalqubits." Nature561,no.7723(2018):368-373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0470-y

    2018 doi

  15. [21]

    Quantumgateteleportationbetween separatedqubitsinatrapped-ionprocessor

    Y.Wan,D.Kienzler,S.D.Erickson,etal."Quantumgateteleportationbetween separatedqubitsinatrapped-ionprocessor." Science364,no.6443(2019):875-878. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw9415

    2019 doi

  16. [22]

    Quantumgateteleportationwiththesuperpositionofcausal order

    W.Q.LiuandH.R.Wei."Quantumgateteleportationwiththesuperpositionofcausal order." Physical Review Applied23,no.1(2025):014064. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.014064

    2025 doi

  17. [23]

    AsymptoticTeleportationSchemeasaUniversal ProgrammableQuantumProcessor

    S.IshizakaandT.Hiroshima."AsymptoticTeleportationSchemeasaUniversal ProgrammableQuantumProcessor." Physical Review Letters101,no.24(2008):240501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.240501

    2008 doi

  18. [24]

    Quantumteleportationschemebyselectingoneof multipleoutputports

    S.IshizakaandT.Hiroshima."Quantumteleportationschemebyselectingoneof multipleoutputports." Physical Review A79,no.4(2009):042306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042306

    2009 doi

  19. [25]

    Generalizationofport-basedteleportationandcontrolled teleportationcapability

    K.Jeong,J.Kim,andS.Lee."Generalizationofport-basedteleportationandcontrolled teleportationcapability." Physical Review A102,no.1(2020):012414. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.012414

    2020 doi

  20. [26]

    UnconditionalQuantumTeleportation

    A.Furusawa,J.L.Sorensen,S.L.Braunstein,C.A.Fuchs,H.J.Kimble,andE.S. Polzik."UnconditionalQuantumTeleportation." Science282,no.5389(1998):706-709. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.706

    1998 doi

  21. [27]

    Unconditionalquantumteleportationbetween distantsolidstatequantumbits

    W.Pfaff,B.J.Hensen,H.Bernien,etal."Unconditionalquantumteleportationbetween distantsolidstatequantumbits." Science345,no.6196(2014):532-535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253512

    2014 doi

  22. [28]

    Controlpowerofhigh-dimensionalcontrolled teleportation

    T.J.Wang,G.Q.Yang,andC.Wang."Controlpowerofhigh-dimensionalcontrolled teleportation." Physical Review A101,no.1(2020):012323. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.012323

    2020 doi

  23. [29]

    DemonstrationofControlledQuantum TeleportationforDiscreteVariablesonLinearOpticalDevices

    A.Barasinski,A.Cernoch,andK.Lemr."DemonstrationofControlledQuantum TeleportationforDiscreteVariablesonLinearOpticalDevices." Physical Review Letters 122(2019):170501.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.170501. 30

    2019 doi

  24. [30]

    QuantumTeleportationofShared QuantumSecret

    S.M.Lee,S.W.Lee,H.Jeong,andH.S.Park."QuantumTeleportationofShared QuantumSecret." Physical Review Letters124(2020):060501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.060501

    2020 doi

  25. [31]

    Asinglequantumcannotbecloned

    W.K.WoottersandW.H.Zurek."Asinglequantumcannotbecloned." Nature299,no. 5886(1982):802-803.https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

    1982 doi

  26. [32]

    ExperimentalBell-StateAnalysis

    H.Weinfurter."ExperimentalBell-StateAnalysis." Europhysics Letters25,no.8(1994): 559.https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/25/8/001

    1994 doi

  27. [33]

    MeasurementoftheBelloperatorandquantum teleportation

    S.L.BraunsteinandA.Mann."MeasurementoftheBelloperatorandquantum teleportation." Physical Review A51,no.3(1995):R1727-R1730. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727

    1995 doi

  28. [34]

    Bellmeasurementsfor teleportation

    N.Lutkenhaus,J.Calsamiglia,andK.A.Suominen."Bellmeasurementsfor teleportation." Physical Review A59,no.5(1999):3295-3300. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295

    1999 doi

  29. [35]

    Maximumefficiencyofalinear-opticalBell-state analyzer

    J.CalsamigliaandN.Lutkenhaus."Maximumefficiencyofalinear-opticalBell-state analyzer." Applied PhysicsB72,no.1(2001):67-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400000484

    2001 doi

  30. [36]

    Free-spacedisseminationoftimeandfrequency with 10−19 instabilityover113km

    QiShen,J.Y.Guan,J.G.Ren,etal."Free-spacedisseminationoftimeandfrequency with 10−19 instabilityover113km." Nature610,no.7933(2022):661-666. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05228-5

    2022 doi

  31. [37]

    Long-distance teleportationofqubitsattelecommunicationwavelengths

    I.Marcikic,H.deRiedmatten,W.Tittel,H.Zbinden,andN.Gisin."Long-distance teleportationofqubitsattelecommunicationwavelengths." Nature421,no.6922(2003): 509-513.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01376

    2003 doi

  32. [38]

    Long DistanceQuantumTeleportationinaQuantumRelayConfiguration

    H.deRiedmatten,I.Marcikic,W.Tittel,H.Zbinden,D.Collins,andN.Gisin."Long DistanceQuantumTeleportationinaQuantumRelayConfiguration." Physical Review Letters92,no.4(2004):047904.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.047904

    2004 doi

  33. [39]

    QuantumteleportationovertheSwisscomtelecommunicationnetwork

    O.Landry,J.A.W.vanHouwelingen,A.Beveratos,H.Zbinden,andN.Gisin. "QuantumteleportationovertheSwisscomtelecommunicationnetwork." Journal of the Optical Society of America B24,no.2(2007):398-403. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.24.000398

    2007 doi

  34. [40]

    Classical-decisivequantuminternetby integratedphotonics

    Y.C.Zhang,R.Broberg,A.Zhu,etal."Classical-decisivequantuminternetby integratedphotonics." Science389,no.6763(2025):940-944. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adx6176. 31

    2025 doi

  35. [41]

    Quantumteleportationwithindependentsources andpriorentanglementdistributionoveranetwork

    Q.C.Sun,Y.L.Mao,S.J.Chen,etal."Quantumteleportationwithindependentsources andpriorentanglementdistributionoveranetwork." Nature Photonics10,no.10(2016): 671-675.https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.179

    2016 doi

  36. [42]

    Chip-to-chipphotonicquantumteleportationover opticalfibersof12.3km

    D.N.Liu,Z.P.Jin,J.Y.Liu,etal."Chip-to-chipphotonicquantumteleportationover opticalfibersof12.3km." Light: Science & Applications14,no.1(2025):243. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-025-01920-z

    2025 doi

  37. [43]

    QuantumteleportationacrosstheDanube

    R.Ursin,T.Jennewein,M.Aspelmeyer,R.Kaltenbaek,M.Lindenthal,P.Walther,and A.Zeilinger."QuantumteleportationacrosstheDanube." Nature430,no.7002(2004): 849-849.https://doi.org/10.1038/430849a

    2004 doi

  38. [44]

    Experimentalfree-spacequantumteleportation

    X.M.Jin,J.G.Ren,B.Yang,etal."Experimentalfree-spacequantumteleportation." Nature Photonics4,no.6(2010):376-381.https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.87

    2010 doi

  39. [45]

    Quantumteleportationandentanglementdistributionover 100-kilometrefree-spacechannels

    J.Yin,J.G.Ren,H.Lu,etal."Quantumteleportationandentanglementdistributionover 100-kilometrefree-spacechannels." Nature488,no.7410(2012):185-188. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11332

    2012 doi

  40. [46]

    QuantumStateTransferover1200kmAssistedbyPrior DistributedEntanglement

    B.Li,Y.Cao,Y.H.Li,etal."QuantumStateTransferover1200kmAssistedbyPrior DistributedEntanglement." Physical Review Letters128,no.17(2022):170501. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.170501

    2022 doi

  41. [47]

    Quantumteleportationover143kilometresusing activefeed-forward

    X.S.Ma,T.Herbst,T.Scheidl,etal."Quantumteleportationover143kilometresusing activefeed-forward." Nature489,no.7415(2012):269-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11472

    2012 doi

  42. [48]

    TeleportationSystemsTowardaQuantum Internet

    R.Valivarthi,S.I.Davis,C.Peña,etal."TeleportationSystemsTowardaQuantum Internet." PRX Quantum1,no.2(2020):020317. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020317

    2020 doi

  43. [49]

    Hertz-ratemetropolitanquantumteleportation

    S.Shen,C.Z.Yuan,Z.C.Zhang,etal."Hertz-ratemetropolitanquantumteleportation." Light: Science & Applications12,no.1(2023):115.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023- 01158-7

    2023 doi

  44. [50]

    Quantumteleportationcoexistingwith classicalcommunicationsinopticalfiber

    J.M.Thomas,F.I.Yeh,J.H.Chen,etal."Quantumteleportationcoexistingwith classicalcommunicationsinopticalfiber." Optica11,no.12(2024):1700-1707. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.540362

    2024 doi

  45. [51]

    Quantumteleportationacrossa metropolitanfibrenetwork

    R.Valivarthi,M.L.G.Puigibert,Q.Zhou,etal."Quantumteleportationacrossa metropolitanfibrenetwork." Nature Photonics10,no.10(2016):676-680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.180. 32

    2016 doi

  46. [52]

    Delayed-choicegedankenexperimentsandtheir realizations

    X.S.Ma,J.Kofler,andA.Zeilinger."Delayed-choicegedankenexperimentsandtheir realizations." Reviews of Modern Physics88,no.1(2016):015005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015005

    2016 doi

  47. [54]

    VacuumBeamGuideforLargeScaleQuantumNetworks

    Y.X.Huang,F.Salces-Carcoba,R.X.Adhikari,A.H.Safavi-Naeini,andL.Jiang. "VacuumBeamGuideforLargeScaleQuantumNetworks." Physical Review Letters133 (2024):020801.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.020801

    2024 doi

  48. [55]

    Broadbandopticalfibrewithan attenuationlowerthan0.1decibelperkilometre

    M.Petrovich,E.NumkamFokoua,Y.Chen,etal."Broadbandopticalfibrewithan attenuationlowerthan0.1decibelperkilometre." Nature Photonics19,no.11(2025): 1203-1208.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01747-5

    2025 doi

  49. [56]

    Quantumteleportationwithdissimilar quantumdotsoverahybridquantumnetwork

    A.Laneve,G.Ronco,M.Beccaceci,etal."Quantumteleportationwithdissimilar quantumdotsoverahybridquantumnetwork." Nature Communications16,no.1(2025): 10028.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65911-9

    2025 doi

  50. [57]

    SpectralMultiplexingforScalable QuantumPhotonicsusinganAtomicFrequencyCombQuantumMemoryandFeed- ForwardControl

    N.Sinclair,E.Saglamyurek,H.Mallahzadeh,etal."SpectralMultiplexingforScalable QuantumPhotonicsusinganAtomicFrequencyCombQuantumMemoryandFeed- ForwardControl." Physical Review Letters113,no.5(2014):053603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.053603

    2014 doi

  51. [58]

    Heraldedentanglementdistributionbetweentwoabsorptive quantummemories

    X.Liu,J.Hu,Z.F.Li,etal."Heraldedentanglementdistributionbetweentwoabsorptive quantummemories." Nature594,no.7861(2021):41-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03505-3

    2021 doi

  52. [59]

    Quantumrepeatersbasedon atomicensemblesandlinearoptics

    N.Sangouard,C.Simon,H.deRiedmatten,andN.Gisin."Quantumrepeatersbasedon atomicensemblesandlinearoptics." Reviews of Modern Physics83,no.1(2011):33-80. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.33

    2011 doi

  53. [60]

    Advancesinquantumentanglement purification

    P.S.Yan,L.Zhou,W.Zhong,andY.B.Sheng."Advancesinquantumentanglement purification." Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy66(2023):250301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-2065-x

    2023 doi

  54. [61]

    Temporalasymmetryinentanglementdistillation

    Y.H.Li,J.J.Xing,D.K.Qu,etal."Temporalasymmetryinentanglementdistillation." Physical Review Letters135(2025):170801.https://doi.org/10.1103/glc7-xy8t

    2025 doi

  55. [62]

    Quantumopticalmemoryforentanglementdistribution

    Y.S.Lei,F.KimiaeeAsadi,T.Zhong,A.Kuzmich,C.Simon,andM.Hosseini. "Quantumopticalmemoryforentanglementdistribution." Optica10,no.11(2023): 1511-1528.https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.493732. 33

    2023 doi

  56. [63]

    Functionalquantumnodesforentanglement distributionoverscalablequantumnetworks

    C.W.Chou,J.Laurat,H.Deng,etal."Functionalquantumnodesforentanglement distributionoverscalablequantumnetworks." Science316,no.5829(2007):1316-1320. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140300

    2007 doi

  57. [64]

    Entanglementofsingle-atomquantum bitsatadistance

    D.L.Moehring,P.Maunz,S.Olmschenk,etal."Entanglementofsingle-atomquantum bitsatadistance." Nature449,no.7158(2007):68-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06118

    2007 doi

  58. [65]

    ExperimentaldemonstrationofaBDCZquantumrepeaternode

    Z.S.Yuan,Y.A.Chen,B.Zhao,S.Chen,J.Schmiedmayer,andJ.W.Pan. "ExperimentaldemonstrationofaBDCZquantumrepeaternode." Nature454,no.7208 (2008):1098-1101.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07241

    2008 doi

  59. [66]

    Entanglementoftwoquantummemoriesviafibresover dozensofkilometres

    Y.Yu,F.Ma,X.Y.Luo,etal."Entanglementoftwoquantummemoriesviafibresover dozensofkilometres." Nature578,no.7794(2020):240-245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1976-7

    2020 doi

  60. [67]

    Telecommband-integratedmultimodephotonic quantummemory

    X.Y.Zhang,B.Zhang,S.H.Wei,etal."Telecommband-integratedmultimodephotonic quantummemory." Science Advances9,no.28(2023):eadf4587. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.afd4587

    2023 doi

  61. [68]

    Quantumstorageof1650modesofsingle photonsattelecomwavelength

    S.H.Wei,B.Jing,X.Y.Zhang,etal."Quantumstorageof1650modesofsingle photonsattelecomwavelength." npj Quantum Information10,no.1(2024):19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00812-1

    2024 doi

  62. [69]

    Longdistance multiplexedquantumteleportationfromatelecomphotontoasolid-statequbit

    D.Lago-Rivera,J.V.Rakonjac,S.Grandi,andH.d.Riedmatten."Longdistance multiplexedquantumteleportationfromatelecomphotontoasolid-statequbit." Nature Communications14,no.1(2023):1889.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37518-5

    2023 doi

  63. [70]

    Efficientintegratedquantummemoryforlight

    R.-R.Meng,P.-X.Liu,X.Liu,etal."Efficientintegratedquantummemoryforlight." Nature Photonics.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-026-01845-y

    doi

  64. [71]

    Experimentalnonlocalityproofof quantumteleportationandentanglementswapping

    T.Jennewein,G.Weihs,J.W.Pan,andA.Zeilinger."Experimentalnonlocalityproofof quantumteleportationandentanglementswapping." Physical Review Letters88,no.1 (2001):017903.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017903

    2001 doi

  65. [72]

    Deterministicquantumteleportationof atomicqubits

    M.D.Barrett,J.Chiaverini,T.Schaetz,etal."Deterministicquantumteleportationof atomicqubits." Nature429,no.6993(2004):737-739. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02608

    2004 doi

  66. [73]

    Deterministicquantumteleportationwith atoms

    M.Riebe,H.Haffner,C.F.Roos,etal."Deterministicquantumteleportationwith atoms." Nature429,no.6993(2004):734-737.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02570

    2004 doi

  67. [74]

    Longdistancequantumteleportation

    X.X.Xia,Q.C.Sun,Q.Zhang,andJ.W.Pan."Longdistancequantumteleportation." Quantum Science and Technology3,no.1(2017):014012.https://doi.org/10.1088/2058- 9565/aa9bfa. 34

    2017 doi

  68. [75]

    Feasibilityof satellitequantumkeydistribution

    C.Bonato,A.Tomaello,V.DaDeppo,G.Naletto,andP.Villoresi."Feasibilityof satellitequantumkeydistribution." New Journal of Physics11,no.4(2009):045017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045017

    2009 doi

  69. [76]

    Long- distancequantumcommunicationwithentangledphotonsusingsatellites

    M.Aspelmeyer,T.Jennewein,M.Pfennigbauer,W.R.Leeb,andA.Zeilinger."Long- distancequantumcommunicationwithentangledphotonsusingsatellites." IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics9,no.6(2003):1541-1551. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820918

    2003

  70. [77]

    Acomprehensivedesignand performanceanalysisoflowEarthorbitsatellitequantumcommunication

    J.P.Bourgoin,E.Meyer-Scott,B.L.Higgins,etal."Acomprehensivedesignand performanceanalysisoflowEarthorbitsatellitequantumcommunication." New Journal of Physics15,no.2(2013):023006.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/023006

    2013 doi

  71. [78]

    Long-distancefree-spacequantumkeydistribution indaylighttowardsinter-satellitecommunication

    S.K.Liao,H.L.Yong,C.Liu,etal."Long-distancefree-spacequantumkeydistribution indaylighttowardsinter-satellitecommunication." Nature Photonics11,no.8(2017): 509-513.https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.116

    2017 doi

  72. [79]

    Optimalextractionofinformationfromfinitequantum ensembles

    S.MassarandS.Popescu."Optimalextractionofinformationfromfinitequantum ensembles." Physical Review Letters74,no.8(1995):1259. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259

    1995 doi

  73. [80]

    Pulsedenergy-timeentangledtwin- photonsourceforquantumcommunication

    J.Brendel,N.Gisin,W.Tittel,andH.Zbinden."Pulsedenergy-timeentangledtwin- photonsourceforquantumcommunication." Physical Review Letters82,no.12(1999): 2594.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2594

    1999 doi

  74. [81]

    Photonicentanglementforfundamentaltestsandquantum communication

    W.TittelandG.Weihs."Photonicentanglementforfundamentaltestsandquantum communication." Quantum Information and Computation1,no.2(2001):3-56. https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC1.2-1

    2001 doi

  75. [82]

    Quantum teleportationover100kmoffiberusinghighlyefficientsuperconductingnanowire single-photondetectors

    H.Takesue,S.D.Dyer,M.J.Stevens,V.Verma,R.P.Mirin,andS.W.Nam."Quantum teleportationover100kmoffiberusinghighlyefficientsuperconductingnanowire single-photondetectors." Optica2,no.10(2015):832-835. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000832

    2015 doi

  76. [84]

    High-PerformanceQuantumTeleportation SystemsatTelecomC-Band

    S.Shen,C.Z.Yuan,Z.C.Zhang,etal.2021."High-PerformanceQuantumTeleportation SystemsatTelecomC-Band."InConferenceonLasersandElectro-Optics,OSA TechnicalDigest,FM3M.2.https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_QELS.2021.FM3M.2. 35

    2021 doi

  77. [85]

    Entanglementswappingover100kmoptical fiberwithindependententangledphoton-pairsources

    Q.C.Sun,Y.F.Jiang,Y.L.Mao,etal."Entanglementswappingover100kmoptical fiberwithindependententangledphoton-pairsources." Optica4,no.10(2017):1214- 1218.https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.001214

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.