Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

The 2024 outburst of the Be/X-ray pulsar 2S 1553−542 fixes the neutron star's spin at 9.285022 ± 0.000001 seconds and identifies its cyclotron absorption line at about 24 keV, implying a magnetic field of roughly 3×10^12 gauss.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 02:07 UTC pith:NQN4YQHL

load-bearing objection Competent 2024-outburst characterization of a known X-ray pulsar; the cyclotron B-field headline is softer than it looks once you notice the gabs/cyclabs 4 keV split, and the mHz candidates are honestly labeled but undertrialed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25548 v1 pith:NQN4YQHL submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.HE

Timing and Spectral Analysis of the 2024 Outburst of 2S 1553-542 with NuSTAR and NICER

Haifan Zhu , Wei Wang , Wen Yang , Mariano Mendez , Chenxu Gao , Ziyi Xu , Pengfu Tian This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron starsX-ray binary pulsarscyclotron resonance scattering featuremagnetic fieldspulse timingX-ray spectroscopyaccretion columnsmHz quasi-periodic oscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes NuSTAR and NICER observations of the 2024 outburst of the X-ray pulsar 2S 1553−542. It establishes the neutron star's spin period at 9.285022 ± 0.000001 s, the most precise measurement for this source, and detects a cyclotron resonant scattering feature at approximately 24 keV, which implies a surface magnetic field of roughly 3×10^12 gauss. The pulse profile shows an energy-dependent wing-like structure and a pulsed fraction that rises with energy, indicating a high-luminosity accretion state near the critical regime. Phase-resolved spectroscopy shows the cyclotron line parameters vary with pulse phase and become unconstrained during the wing phase, consistent with a rotating, structured accretion column. A search for mHz quasi-periodic oscillations in short NICER exposures finds only candidate features near 10 and 20 mHz, explicitly not firm detections.

Core claim

The core discovery is a precise measurement of the spin and magnetic field of 2S 1553−542 during its 2024 outburst. From NuSTAR timing, the pulse period is 9.285022 ± 0.000001 s. The phase-averaged spectrum is described by an absorbed blackbody plus cutoff power law, an iron emission line, and a cyclotron absorption feature; using the cyclabs profile, the line energy is 24.11 ± 0.23 keV, giving B ≈ 3×10^12 G under the standard formula with z ≈ 0.3. The energy-resolved pulse profiles are single-peaked with a wing most prominent in the 12–22 keV band, and the pulsed fraction stays above 60% and increases with energy. Phase-resolved spectroscopy reveals variations in the continuum and cyclotron

What carries the argument

The central object is the cyclotron resonant scattering feature (CRSF), a spectral absorption line formed by electrons in quantized Landau levels, whose energy E_cyc relates to the magnetic field by B ≈ E_cyc(1+z)/11.57 × 10^12 G. The paper uses two phenomenological line profiles, gabs and cyclabs, to characterize the CRSF; cyclabs gives 24.11 keV and gabs gives 27.95 keV, and the adopted profile affects the inferred field. The timing analysis uses epoch folding and Gaussian fits to the pulse peak. Phase-resolved spectroscopy uses the gabs profile to track how the line evolves with rotation, interpreting the variations in terms of a rotating accretion column viewed from different angles.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic field estimate rests on the assumption that the 20–30 keV absorption feature is a cyclotron line and that the chosen continuum and line profile correctly isolate it, since gabs and cyclabs give line energies of 27.95 and 24.11 keV respectively.

What would settle it

A longer, high-throughput observation covering the 20–30 keV range could test the cyclotron interpretation: if the absorption feature's centroid shifts with pulse phase or luminosity in a way inconsistent with a fixed surface field, or if no second harmonic is found at roughly twice the line energy, the B ≈ 3×10^12 G inference would be weakened.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The measured spin period (9.285022 s) provides a stable ephemeris for future observations of 2S 1553−542.
  • The cyclotron line at ~24 keV implies a magnetic field of ~3×10^12 G, consistent with the 2015 and 2021 outbursts, suggesting no significant long-term field change in the line-forming region.
  • The absence of a pulsed-fraction dip near the cyclotron energy and the presence of the 12–22 keV wing indicate a high-luminosity accretion state, likely near or above the critical luminosity L_crit ≈ 4.8×10^37 erg/s.
  • Phase-dependent CRSF parameters support a viewing-angle-dependent accretion column geometry, linking pulse-phase structure to magnetic field orientation.
  • The candidate mHz features at ~10 and ~20 mHz, if verified with longer observations, would probe disk–magnetosphere interaction, but the current data cannot confirm them.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The consistency of the cyclotron energy across three outbursts suggests the magnetic field threading the line-forming region is anchored in the neutron star crust, rather than being dynamically modified by accretion—though cross-model comparisons (gabs vs. cyclabs) introduce a systematic uncertainty that should be addressed in future work.
  • If the candidate mHz variability is real, its frequency (0.01–0.02 Hz) is far below the spin frequency, so it likely arises from disk–magnetosphere interaction rather than a beat with the spin; targeted long monitoring at similar luminosity could test whether the features recur.
  • The energy-dependent wing structure in the pulse profile could be modeled with pencil- and fan-beam emission patterns to map the accretion column's angular emission profile, extending the paper's qualitative interpretation.
  • The difference between gabs and cyclabs line energies (27.95 vs 24.11 keV) implies that comparisons of CRSF energies across different instruments and epochs should use matched models to avoid false claims of field variability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports timing and spectral results for the 2024 outburst of the Be/X-ray binary pulsar 2S 1553−542 using NuSTAR and NICER. From NuSTAR data the authors measure a pulse period of 9.285022 ± 0.000001 s, find energy-dependent single-peaked pulse profiles with a wing structure most prominent at 12–22 keV, and quantify a pulsed fraction that stays above 60% and increases with energy. The phase-averaged NuSTAR spectrum is fit with an absorbed blackbody plus cutoff power law and an iron line; adding either gabs or cyclabs removes a broad 20–30 keV residual. The cyclabs fit gives E_cyc ≈ 24.1 keV, from which B ∼ 3 × 10^12 G is derived. Phase-resolved spectroscopy shows continuum and gabs line parameters varying with phase, with the line unconstrained during the 0.4–0.6 wing phase. A wavelet and CEEMDAN-HHT search of short NICER GTIs finds candidate mHz excesses near 10 and 20 mHz, explicitly treated as candidates rather than firm QPO detections.

Significance. If the spectral-model systematics are properly accounted for, the paper provides a useful multi-epoch measurement of the spin period and cyclotron feature of 2S 1553−542, adding to the 2015 and 2021 outburst studies. The strengths are the use of public NuSTAR/NICER data with standard reduction tools, the explicit and appropriate hedging of the mHz analysis, the phase-resolved comparison with earlier outbursts, and the quantified pulsed-fraction slope. The timing result is robust and the mHz discussion is admirably cautious. The main significance hinges on the cyclotron-line centroid and the derived magnetic field, and that claim currently depends on which of two equally good phenomenological line profiles is adopted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Table 2, Abstract] The cyclotron line centroid is model-dependent at the 15% level: gabs gives E_gabs = 27.95 ± 0.34 keV while cyclabs gives E_cyc = 24.11 ± 0.23 keV, with nearly identical fit quality (χ²ν = 0.967 vs 0.963). The abstract and conclusions quote only the cyclabs value and the corresponding B ≈ 3 × 10^12 G, so the reported field does not include this 3.8 keV systematic. The authors should either report a range B ≈ 2.7–3.1 × 10^12 G covering both profiles, or justify physically why cyclabs is preferred. The strong degeneracy with the continuum (kT drops from 3.26 to 0.86 keV, Γ from 1.95 to −0.5, E_cut from 20.8 to 5.4 keV when the line is added) should also be discussed, since it means the residual could be partly a continuum artifact.
  2. [§3.2, Table 2] The magnetic field estimate B ≈ E_cyc(1+z)/11.57 × 10^12 G assumes z ≈ 0.3, but the line-forming region is not necessarily at the neutron-star surface; the redshift is degenerate with the line-formation height. As the paper notes the cyclotron energy itself is model-dependent, the sentence in §3.2 that the field estimate is 'robust for the purpose of our timing analysis' is too strong. A conservative statement should separate the statistical uncertainty of the fit from the model and redshift systematics, which are each larger than the quoted 0.23 keV error.
  3. [§3.3, Figs. 8–10] The wavelet and CEEMDAN-HHT results are presented as consistent, but the Fourier PDS analysis gives a Lorentzian centroid of 9.56 ± 17.31 mHz, i.e., unconstrained. The threshold A(t) > ⟨A⟩ is explicitly not a significance criterion. The paper is already careful to call these candidate features, but the claim of consistency between wavelet and HHT should be further softened: both methods are applied to the same short GTIs, and the HHT decomposition does not provide an independent confirmation. This does not affect the main timing/spectral claims, but the Discussion should state more clearly that no significance can be assigned to the mHz features.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 3] In the phase-resolved table, Phase 3 entries for Egabs, σgabs, and Sgabs are shown as '−−' with a dagger footnote saying parameters are poorly constrained. Please state explicitly in the text or table caption that the gabs component was omitted for that phase bin, as is done in Fig. 5.
  2. [§2.1] The description of NICER's installation date ('Installed on the ISS on June 13, 2017, following its June 3 launch') should be checked; the actual installation and commissioning dates differ slightly. This is a factual detail that does not affect the analysis.
  3. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption says 'the left horizontal axis indicates the wavelet power' but in the displayed panels the color scale indicates power; please clarify the axis labels in the figure itself.
  4. [§4.1] The luminosity L_X ≈ (3.3–7.3) × 10^37 erg/s is derived from a distance range of 16–24 kpc, but the distance uncertainty is not propagated into the discussion of the critical luminosity. A brief caveat would help.
  5. [§3.1, Eq. (1)] The pulsed fraction is defined via the maximum and minimum of the folded profile. At 50–70 keV the count rate is low, so the statistical uncertainty on PF is non-negligible; the plotted error bars are shown but the fit in Fig. 3 appears to ignore the covariance between bins. A short remark on how the uncertainties were obtained would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: spin period and cyclotron energy are direct observational fits, and the mHz features are explicitly labeled candidate.

full rationale

I traced the load-bearing derivations. The pulse period (9.285022 ± 0.000001 s) is measured by epoch folding and Gaussian-peak fitting of barycentered, background-corrected NuSTAR light curves; it is not derived from the spectral model or from any prior assumption about the source. The cyclotron energy E_cyc ≃ 24.1 keV is the fitted centroid of a phenomenological absorption profile (cyclabs), and the reported B ∼ 3×10^12 G is the standard conversion B ≃ E_cyc(1+z)/11.57 × 10^12 G, not an input to the fit. The alternative gabs profile gives a different centroid (27.95 ± 0.34 keV), and the paper acknowledges this profile dependence; that is a model systematic, not a fit disguised as a prediction. The phase-resolved spectroscopy uses gabs for comparability with the 2021 outburst analysis, with the profile choice explicitly stated, and the phase-dependent variations are descriptive fits, not predictions forced by the phase-averaged result. The wavelet and CEEMDAN–HHT analyses are applied to the same short NICER GTIs, but the paper repeatedly and explicitly refrains from claiming a detection, noting COI effects, red noise, and the lack of a well-constrained Fourier peak; therefore there is no circular 'confirmation.' Self-citations (e.g., Zhu & Wang 2025 for wavelet methods, Yang & Wang for prior mHz detections) are methodological pointers and are not load-bearing assumptions or uniqueness claims. The central timing and spectral results are self-contained against the observed data and external measurements of earlier outbursts. No circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central quantitative results are fit-driven: spectral parameters are fitted to NuSTAR data under a chosen phenomenological continuum, and the magnetic-field estimate is a standard transformation of the fitted cyclotron energy. No new entities are introduced, and the wavelet/HHT analyses are standard algorithms. The main burden is the model-dependence of the line parameters and the fixed NH/redshift/distance assumptions.

free parameters (8)
  • Hydrogen column density N_H = 2.3e22 cm^-2 (fixed)
    Set from Lutovinov et al. 2016, not re-fit; shifts continuum and line parameters if wrong.
  • Blackbody temperature kT = 0.876±0.016 keV (Model 3)
    Fitted spectral parameter in Mcont.
  • Blackbody normalization Kbb = 24.7±1.5
    Fitted spectral parameter.
  • Cutoff power-law photon index Γ and Ecut = Γ=-0.503±0.067; Ecut=5.868±0.215 keV
    Fitted continuum parameters; model-dependent.
  • Iron line EFe, σFe, KFe = 6.304±0.004 keV; 0.472±0.048 keV; 5.82±0.65e-4
    Fitted Gaussian iron-line parameters.
  • Cyclotron line Ecyc, Wcyc, Dcyc (cyclabs) = 24.11±0.23 keV; 10.1±0.8 keV; 0.754±0.057
    Fitted CRSF parameters; drive B estimate. gabs alternative: Egabs=27.95±0.34 keV.
  • Pulsed-fraction log fit a,b = a=68.81±0.54%; b=8.17±2.46 %/decade
    Empirical fit to PF vs energy; slope 3.33σ.
  • FPMA/FPMB cross-normalization CFPMB = 0.992±0.001
    Fitted cross-calibration constant.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Standard cyclotron line formula B ≈ E_cyc(1+z)/11.57 × 10^12 G with z≈0.3
    Used to convert fitted E_cyc to B; if gravitational redshift or resonance physics differs, B changes. Invoked in §3.2 and §4.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Phenomenological spectral model Mcont = constant×TBabs×(bbodyrad+cutoffpl+gauss)
    The continuum/line decomposition is chosen to fit the data; line parameters depend on this choice, as shown by gabs vs cyclabs difference (Table 2).
  • domain assumption N_H fixed at 2.3×10^22 cm^-2 from prior work
    Taken from Lutovinov et al. 2016; affects all spectral parameters. §3.2.
  • domain assumption Distance 16–24 kpc and critical luminosity Lcrit~4.8×10^37 erg/s from prior estimates
    Used to derive L_X and accretion-regime interpretation. §4.1.
  • domain assumption Epoch-folding and Gaussian peak fitting yield an unbiased pulse period
    Assumes spin period is stable over the NuSTAR observation and that orbital/barycentric corrections are complete; NICER periods show ~0.002 s scatter across days. §3.1.
  • standard math Torrence-Compo wavelet and CEEMDAN-HHT algorithms as implemented in pycwt are appropriate for short, non-stationary light curves
    Standard signal-processing methods; used only to identify candidate features, not formal detections. §3.3.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19022 in / 17176 out tokens · 166954 ms · 2026-08-01T02:07:05.075282+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We report a timing and spectral study of the 2024 outburst of the Be/X-ray binary pulsar 2S~1553$-$542 using \textit{NuSTAR} and \textit{NICER} observations. From the \textit{NuSTAR} light curve we measure a pulse period of $9.285022\pm0.000001$~s. The energy-resolved pulse profiles are dominated by a single peak and show a wing-like structure most clearly in the $12$--$22$~keV band. The pulsed fraction remains above 60\% and increases with energy. The phase-averaged \textit{NuSTAR} spectrum is described by an absorbed blackbody plus cutoff power-law continuum, together with an iron emission line and a cyclotron absorption feature. Using the \texttt{cyclabs} model, we obtain a cyclotron energy of $E_{\rm cyc}\simeq24.1$~keV, corresponding to a magnetic field strength of $B\sim3\times10^{12}$~G. Phase-resolved spectroscopy shows that the continuum and cyclotron-line parameters vary with pulse phase, and that the line becomes poorly constrained around the pulse-wing phase. We also searched the short \textit{NICER} GTIs for transient mHz variability using wavelet analysis and a CEEMDAN-based Hilbert--Huang transform. Localized excesses near $\sim10$~mHz and $\sim20$~mHz are found, but the short exposures, COI effects, red-noise fluctuations, and the lack of a well-constrained Fourier peak limit their significance. We therefore treat them as candidate mHz variability rather than firm mHz QPO detections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25548 by Chenxu Gao, Haifan Zhu, Mariano Mendez, Pengfu Tian, Wei Wang, Wen Yang, Ziyi Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pulse profiles from the NuSTAR observation, with each panel corresponding to a selected energy band indicated in the figure. The gray-shaded regions denote the locations of the wing structures. of 0.0078125 s. The pulse periods were derived from the combined, background-corrected NuSTAR FPMA and FPMB light curves. The epoch-folding technique [30] was applied using the efsearch tool3 from HEASARC to determi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pulse profiles from NICER (1-10 keV) , with each panel representing one observation. The corresponding observation IDs are indicated in the figure. The gray-shaded regions mark the locations of the wing structures. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy dependence of the pulsed fraction derived from the NuSTAR data. The dashed line shows the best-fitting logarithmic relation, with the gray shaded region indicating its 1σ confidence interval. 2.3 × 1022 cm−2 , following previous studies [25]. The component bbodyrad is characterized by the temperature kT and normalization Kbb = (Rkm/D10) 2 , where Rkm is the radius of the emitting region in kilometer… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The phase-averaged NuSTAR spectrum fitted with Model 3 (cyclabs; upper panel), together with the residuals for Model 1, Model 2 (gabs), and Model 3 (cyclabs) in the three lower panels. The FPMA and FPMB data are shown in green and blue, respectively. Both CRSF models remove the broad residual structure around 20–30 keV present in Model 1. The residuals have been rebinned for display purposes only. 1.06 × 1… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase-resolved variations of the NuSTAR spectral parameters, shown over two pulse cycles for clarity. From left to right and top to bottom, the panels show the blackbody temperature kT, photon index Γ, cutoff energy Ecut, gabs centroid energy Egabs, line width σgabs, line strength Sgabs, iron-line centroid energy EFe, and iron-line width σFe. The colored data points show the best-fitting spectral parameter… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wavelet power spectra for several representative NICER GTIs. Upper-left: the third GTI of ObsID 7202030101. Upper-right: the fourth GTI of ObsID 7202030101. Lower-left: the first GTI of ObsID 7202030103. Lower-right: the first GTI of ObsID 7202030104. Localized low-frequency excesses are seen in the two GTIs shown in the right column. The color scale indicates the wavelet power, with brighter colors corres… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pulse signal extraction and time-frequency analysis based on the CEEMDAN–HHT method for the fourth GTI of ObsID 7202030101. (a) Comparison between the original mean-centered light curve (gray thin line) and the extracted pulse component (red solid line). (b) Time evolution of the instantaneous amplitude of the pulse component. (c) Time evolution of the instantaneous frequency. where aj(t) is the instantane… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: CEEMDAN–HHT analysis of the candidate mHz variability in the fourth GTI of ObsID 7202030101. (a) The mean-centered light curve with a time resolution of 1 s, overlaid with the selected low-frequency IMF. (b) Instantaneous amplitude of the selected IMF. The horizontal dashed line marks the empirical threshold A(t) = ⟨A⟩, used only to visualize intervals where the extracted component is relatively strong. (c… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FFT-based power density spectrum (PDS) derived from the fourth GTI of ObsID 7202030101. The gray points with error bars show the raw PDS, while the green line shows the logarithmically rebinned PDS. A segment length of 512 s was adopted to improve the frequency resolution around 10 mHz. Because only one short segment is available, the uncertainties remain large, and the candidate low-frequency feature can… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Be/X-ray binaries.Astrophysics and Space Science2011,332, 1–29

    Reig, P . Be/X-ray binaries.Astrophysics and Space Science2011,332, 1–29

  2. [3]

    Intermittent stellar wind accretion and the long-term activity of population I binary systems containing an X-ray pulsar.The Astrophysical journal1986,308, 669–679

    STELLA, L.; WHITE, N.; ROSNER, R. Intermittent stellar wind accretion and the long-term activity of population I binary systems containing an X-ray pulsar.The Astrophysical journal1986,308, 669–679

  3. [4]

    A natural explanation for periodic X-ray outbursts in Be/X-ray binaries.Astronomy & Astrophysics 2001,377, 161–174

    Okazaki, A.; Negueruela, I. A natural explanation for periodic X-ray outbursts in Be/X-ray binaries.Astronomy & Astrophysics 2001,377, 161–174

    2001

  4. [5]

    Millisecond oscillations in X-ray binaries.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2000,38, 717–760

    Klis, M.v.d. Millisecond oscillations in X-ray binaries.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2000,38, 717–760

  5. [6]

    Millihertz Quasi-Periodic Oscillations in Accreting X-Ray Pulsars.Universe2025,12, 7

    Yang, W.; Wang, W. Millihertz Quasi-Periodic Oscillations in Accreting X-Ray Pulsars.Universe2025,12, 7

  6. [7]

    Wavelet analysis of the transient QPOs in MAXI J1535- 571 with Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,517, 182–191

    Chen, X.; Wang, W.; Tian, P .; Zhang, P .; Liu, Q.; Wu, H.; Sai, N.; Huang, Y.; Song, L.; Qu, J.; et al. Wavelet analysis of the transient QPOs in MAXI J1535- 571 with Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,517, 182–191

  7. [8]

    Wavelet analysis of MAXI J1535–571 with Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,513, 4875–4886

    Chen, X.; Wang, W.; You, B.; Tian, P .; Liu, Q.; Zhang, P .; Ding, Y.; Qu, J.; Zhang, S.; Song, L.; et al. Wavelet analysis of MAXI J1535–571 with Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,513, 4875–4886

  8. [9]

    Jin, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W. Wavelet analysis of low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations in MAXI J1803- 298 observed with Insight-HXMT and NICER.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2024,535, 207–216

  9. [10]

    Timing Analysis of Black Hole X-Ray Binaries with Insight-HXMT.Galaxies2025,13, 111

    Zhu, H.; Wang, W. Timing Analysis of Black Hole X-Ray Binaries with Insight-HXMT.Galaxies2025,13, 111

  10. [11]

    Observations of the X-Ray Millihertz Quasiperiodic Oscillations in Hercules X-1.The Astrophysical Journal 2025,980, 194

    Yang, W.; Wang, W. Observations of the X-Ray Millihertz Quasiperiodic Oscillations in Hercules X-1.The Astrophysical Journal 2025,980, 194

    2025

  11. [12]

    Detection of Multiple X-Ray Quasi-periodic Oscillations in IGR J19294+1816 with Insight-HXMT.The Astrophysical Journal2025,988, 115

    Yang, W.; Wang, W. Detection of Multiple X-Ray Quasi-periodic Oscillations in IGR J19294+1816 with Insight-HXMT.The Astrophysical Journal2025,988, 115. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade238. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 21 of 23 −25 0 25 Signal −20 0 20 IMF 1 −20 0 20 IMF 2 −10 0 10 IMF 3 −5 0 5 IMF 4 −2.5 0.0 2.5 IMF 5 0 1...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade238

  12. [13]

    The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Huang, N.E.; Shen, Z.; Long, S.R.; Wu, M.C.; Shih, H.H.; Zheng, Q.; Yen, N.C.; Tung, C.C.; Liu, H.H. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences1998,454, 903–995

  13. [14]

    Hilbert–Huang Transform Analysis of Quasiperiodic Oscillations in MAXI J1820+ 070.The Astrophysical Journal2023,951, 130

    Yu, W.; Bu, Q.C.; Yang, Z.X.; Liu, H.X.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, D.K.; Qu, J.L.; Zhang, S.N.; Zhang, S.; et al. Hilbert–Huang Transform Analysis of Quasiperiodic Oscillations in MAXI J1820+ 070.The Astrophysical Journal2023,951, 130

  14. [15]

    Phase-resolved Spectroscopy of Low-frequency Quasiperiodic Oscillations from the Newly Discovered Black Hole X-Ray Binary Swift J1727

    Shui, Q.C.; Zhang, S.; Peng, J.Q.; Zhang, S.N.; Chen, Y.P .; Ji, L.; Kong, L.D.; Feng, H.; Yu, Z.L.; Wang, P .J.; et al. Phase-resolved Spectroscopy of Low-frequency Quasiperiodic Oscillations from the Newly Discovered Black Hole X-Ray Binary Swift J1727. 8-1613.The Astrophysical Journal2024,973, 59

  15. [16]

    Timing and spectral analysis of the 2025 outburst of 4U 1630−47 with\textit {NICER}

    Zhu, H.; Méndez, M.; Chen, X.; Wang, W. Timing and spectral analysis of the 2025 outburst of 4U 1630−47 with\textit {NICER}. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.022282026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [17]

    Phase-resolved Analyses of Millihertz Quasi-periodic Oscillations in 4U 1636-53 using the Hilbert–Huang Transform.The Astrophysical Journal2020,900, 116

    Hsieh, H.E.; Chou, Y. Phase-resolved Analyses of Millihertz Quasi-periodic Oscillations in 4U 1636-53 using the Hilbert–Huang Transform.The Astrophysical Journal2020,900, 116

  17. [18]

    Evidence for strong cyclotron line emission in the hard X-ray spectrum of Hercules X-1.Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters to the Editor, vol

    Trümper, J.; Pietsch, W.; Reppin, C.; Voges, W.; Staubert, R.; Kendziorra, E. Evidence for strong cyclotron line emission in the hard X-ray spectrum of Hercules X-1.Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters to the Editor, vol. 219, Feb. 1, 1978, p. L105-L110. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft1978,219, L105–L110

    1978

  18. [19]

    Mészáros, P .High-energy radiation from magnetized neutron stars; University of Chicago press, 1992

    1992

  19. [20]

    BeppoSAX detection of a Cyclotron Feature in the spectrum of Cen X-3.Astronomy and Astrophysics, v

    Santangelo, A.; Del Sordo, S.; Segreto, A.; Dal Fiume, D.; Orlandini, M.; Piraino, S. BeppoSAX detection of a Cyclotron Feature in the spectrum of Cen X-3.Astronomy and Astrophysics, v. 340, p. L55-L59 (1998)1998,340, L55–L59

    1998

  20. [21]

    Variations of cyclotron resonant scattering features in Vela X-1 revealed with Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,514, 2805–2814

    Liu, Q.; Wang, W.; Chen, X.; Ding, Y.; Lu, F.; Song, L.; Qu, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. Variations of cyclotron resonant scattering features in Vela X-1 revealed with Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2022,514, 2805–2814

  21. [22]

    MX1553-54.International Astronomical Union Circular1976,2959, 2

    Walter, F. MX1553-54.International Astronomical Union Circular1976,2959, 2

  22. [24]

    NuSTAR discovery of a cyclotron absorption line in the transient X-ray pulsar 2S 1553- 542.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016, 457, 258–266

    Tsygankov, S.S.; Lutovinov, A.A.; Krivonos, R.A.; Molkov, S.V .; Jenke, P .J.; Finger, M.H.; Poutanen, J. NuSTAR discovery of a cyclotron absorption line in the transient X-ray pulsar 2S 1553- 542.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016, 457, 258–266

  23. [25]

    2S 1553- 542: a Be/X-ray binary pulsar on the far side of the Galaxy.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016,462, 3823–3829

    Lutovinov, A.A.; Buckley, D.A.; Townsend, L.J.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Kennea, J. 2S 1553- 542: a Be/X-ray binary pulsar on the far side of the Galaxy.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2016,462, 3823–3829

  24. [26]

    Accreting on the edge: a luminosity-dependent cyclotron line in the Be/X-ray Binary 2S 1553-542 accompanied by accretion regimes transition.The Astrophysical Journal2022,927, 194

    Malacaria, C.; Bhargava, Y.; Coley, J.B.; Ducci, L.; Pradhan, P .; Ballhausen, R.; Fuerst, F.; Islam, N.; Jaisawal, G.K.; Jenke, P .; et al. Accreting on the edge: a luminosity-dependent cyclotron line in the Be/X-ray Binary 2S 1553-542 accompanied by accretion regimes transition.The Astrophysical Journal2022,927, 194

  25. [27]

    MAXI/GSC detection of an X-ray outburst from the Be/X-ray binary pulsar 2S 1553-542 (H 1553-542).The Astronomer’s Telegram 2024,16835, 1

    Nakajima, M.; Negoro, H.; Mihara, T.; Kudo, Y.; Shibui, H.; Takagi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Tatano, K.; Nishio, H.; Kawamuro, T.; et al. MAXI/GSC detection of an X-ray outburst from the Be/X-ray binary pulsar 2S 1553-542 (H 1553-542).The Astronomer’s Telegram 2024,16835, 1

    2024

  26. [28]

    The nuclear spectroscopic telescope array (NuSTAR) high-energy X-ray mission.The Astrophysical Journal2013,770, 103

    Harrison, F.A.; Craig, W.W.; Christensen, F.E.; Hailey, C.J.; Zhang, W.W.; Boggs, S.E.; Stern, D.; Cook, W.R.; Forster, K.; Giommi, P .; et al. The nuclear spectroscopic telescope array (NuSTAR) high-energy X-ray mission.The Astrophysical Journal2013,770, 103

  27. [29]

    The neutron star interior composition explorer (NICER): design and development

    Gendreau, K.C.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Adkins, P .W.; Albert, C.L.; Anders, J.F.; Aylward, A.T.; Baker, C.L.; Balsamo, E.R.; Bamford, W.A.; Benegalrao, S.S.; et al. The neutron star interior composition explorer (NICER): design and development. In Proceedings of the Space telescopes and instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to gamma ray. SPIE, 2016, Vol. 9905, pp. 420–435

    2016

  28. [30]

    On searches for pulsed emission with application to four globular cluster X-ray sources-NGC 1851, 6441, 6624, and 6712.The Astrophysical Journal1983,266, 160–170

    Leahy, D.; Darbro, W.; Elsner, R.; Weisskopf, M.; Sutherland, P .; Kahn, S.; Grindlay, J. On searches for pulsed emission with application to four globular cluster X-ray sources-NGC 1851, 6441, 6624, and 6712.The Astrophysical Journal1983,266, 160–170

  29. [31]

    Stingray 2: A fast and modern Python library for spectral timing.Journal of Open Source Software2024,9, 7389

    Bachetti, M.; Huppenkothen, D.; Stevens, A.; Swinbank, J.; Mastroserio, G.; Lucchini, M.; Lai, E.V .; Buchner, J.; Desai, A.; Joshi, G.; et al. Stingray 2: A fast and modern Python library for spectral timing.Journal of Open Source Software2024,9, 7389

  30. [32]

    Spectral properties of the Be/X-ray pulsar 2S 1553-542 during type II outbursts.Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy2023,44, 39

    Rai, B.; Paul, B.; Tobrej, M.; Ghising, M.; Tamang, R.; Paul, B.C. Spectral properties of the Be/X-ray pulsar 2S 1553-542 during type II outbursts.Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy2023,44, 39

  31. [33]

    Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars.Astronomy & Astrophysics2019,622, A61

    Staubert, R.; Trümper, J.; Kendziorra, E.; Klochkov, D.; Postnov, K.; Kretschmar, P .; Pottschmidt, K.; Haberl, F.; Rothschild, R.; Santangelo, A.; et al. Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars.Astronomy & Astrophysics2019,622, A61

  32. [34]

    A practical guide to wavelet analysis.Bulletin of the American Meteorological society1998,79, 61–78

    Torrence, C.; Compo, G.P . A practical guide to wavelet analysis.Bulletin of the American Meteorological society1998,79, 61–78

  33. [35]

    A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise

    Torres, M.E.; Colominas, M.A.; Schlotthauer, G.; Flandrin, P . A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2011, pp. 4144–4147

    2011

  34. [36]

    On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms

    Rilling, G.; Flandrin, P .; Goncalves, P . On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE-EURASIP workshop on nonlinear signal and image processing NSIP-03, 2003

    2003

  35. [37]

    A simple boundary process technique for empirical mode decomposition

    Zeng, K.; He, M.X. A simple boundary process technique for empirical mode decomposition. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, 2004, Vol. 6, pp. 4258–4261

    2004

  36. [38]

    4U 0115+ 63: phase lags and cyclotron resonant scattering.Astronomy & Astrophysics2011,532, A76

    Ferrigno, C.; Falanga, M.; Bozzo, E.; Becker, P .A.; Klochkov, D.; Santangelo, A. 4U 0115+ 63: phase lags and cyclotron resonant scattering.Astronomy & Astrophysics2011,532, A76

  37. [39]

    The limiting luminosity of accreting neutron stars with magnetic fields.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1976,175, 395–417

    Basko, M.; Sunyaev, R.A. The limiting luminosity of accreting neutron stars with magnetic fields.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1976,175, 395–417

  38. [40]

    Timing properties of the X-ray accreting pulsar 1A 0535+ 262 studied with Insight-HXMT.The Astrophysical Journal2022,935, 125

    Wang, P .; Kong, L.; Zhang, S.; Doroshenko, V .; Santangelo, A.; Ji, L.; Yorgancioglu, E.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Qu, J.; et al. Timing properties of the X-ray accreting pulsar 1A 0535+ 262 studied with Insight-HXMT.The Astrophysical Journal2022,935, 125

  39. [41]

    Timing properties of the X-ray accreting pulsar RX J0440

    Li, P .; Tao, L.; Tuo, Y.; Ge, M.; Kong, L.; Zhang, L.; Bu, Q.; Ji, L.; Qu, J.; Zhang, S.; et al. Timing properties of the X-ray accreting pulsar RX J0440. 9+ 4431 studied with Insight-HXMT and NICER.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2023, 526, 3637–3651

  40. [42]

    Discovery of two cyclotron resonance scattering features in X-ray pulsar cen X-3 by Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2023,519, 5402–5409

    Yang, W.; Wang, W.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X.; Wu, H.; Tian, P .; Chen, J. Discovery of two cyclotron resonance scattering features in X-ray pulsar cen X-3 by Insight-HXMT.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2023,519, 5402–5409

  41. [43]

    Evidence for a Cyclotron Absorption Line and Spectral Transition in EXO 2030+ 375 during the 2021 Giant Outburst.The Astrophysical Journal2024,969, 107

    Yang, W.; Wang, W.; Epili, P .R. Evidence for a Cyclotron Absorption Line and Spectral Transition in EXO 2030+ 375 during the 2021 Giant Outburst.The Astrophysical Journal2024,969, 107

    2030

  42. [44]

    Broad-band study of the Be X-ray binary RX J0520

    Yang, H.; Maitra, C.; Vasilopoulos, G.; Haberl, F.; Jenke, P .; Karaferias, A.; Sharma, R.; Beri, A.; Ji, L.; Jin, C.; et al. Broad-band study of the Be X-ray binary RX J0520. 5–6932 during its outburst in 2024.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2025, 536, 1357–1373

    2024

  43. [45]

    Intensity and source state dependence of the quasi-periodic oscillations in Scorpius X-1.Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Van der Klis, M.; Stella, L.; White, N.; Jansen, F.; Parmar, A. Intensity and source state dependence of the quasi-periodic oscillations in Scorpius X-1.Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 316, May 1, 1987, p. 411-426.1987,316, 411–426

    1987

  44. [46]

    Is GX5–1 a millisecond pulsar?Nature1985,316, 239–241

    Alpar, M.A.; Shaham, J. Is GX5–1 a millisecond pulsar?Nature1985,316, 239–241

  45. [47]

    Precession of magnetically driven warped disks and low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations in low-mass X-ray binaries.The Astrophysical Journal2002,564, 361

    Shirakawa, A.; Lai, D. Precession of magnetically driven warped disks and low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations in low-mass X-ray binaries.The Astrophysical Journal2002,564, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 23 of 23

    doi:10.3390/galaxies1010000

  46. [48]

    LAXPC/AstroSat Study of 1 and 2 mHz Quasi-periodic Oscillations in the Be/X-Ray Binary 4U 0115+ 63 during Its 2015 Outburst.The Astrophysical Journal2019,872, 33

    Roy, J.; Agrawal, P .; Iyer, N.; Bhattacharya, D.; Yadav, J.; Antia, H.; Chauhan, J.; Choudhury, M.; Dedhia, D.; Katoch, T.; et al. LAXPC/AstroSat Study of 1 and 2 mHz Quasi-periodic Oscillations in the Be/X-Ray Binary 4U 0115+ 63 during Its 2015 Outburst.The Astrophysical Journal2019,872, 33. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data ...

    2015