Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 70 references

For compact volume-noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flows, the time slices converge to a unique Gromov–Hausdorff limit identified with the time-zero slice of the Ricci-flow spacetime completion; the same slice governs uniqueness of tangent spaces

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 01:48 UTC pith:XX46UB4C

load-bearing objection Serious paper: the compact Kähler–Ricci uniqueness and codim-4 results likely hold, but Theorems 1.6/1.8/1.9 rest on an asserted, unproved noncompact extension of the FL25 structure theory. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25644 v1 pith:XX46UB4C submitted 2026-07-28 math.DG

Gromov-Hausdorff Limits of Noncollapsed K\"ahler-Ricci Flows and the Geometry of Ricci Shrinkers

classification math.DG MSC 53E2053C5553C2532Q20
keywords Kähler–Ricci flowGromov–Hausdorff limitRicci shrinkerspacetime completiontangent space at infinityFano fibrationnull locussingular set
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proves that the time slices of a compact volume-noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flow approaching its first singular time converge in the Gromov–Hausdorff sense to a unique limit space, canonically identified with the time-zero slice of the Ricci-flow spacetime completion. The regular part of the limit is exactly the complement of the algebro-geometric null locus of the limiting Kähler class, and the singular set has Hausdorff dimension at most 2n−4. For Ricci shrinkers, the same time-zero slice is shown to be the unique tangent space at infinity under broad conditions: for Kähler–Ricci shrinkers with maximal volume growth and an S1-soliton action, and for all four-dimensional Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature. A companion result characterizes asymptotic conicality of a Kähler–Ricci shrinker by biholomorphicity of its Fano fibration outside a compact set.

Core claim

The central claim is that the singular-time limit of a noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flow is not an arbitrary compact metric space but is canonically determined by the spacetime completion: the limit is isometric to the time-zero slice (Z0,dZ0) of the Ricci-flow spacetime completion, with regular part equal to X∖Null(α). The proof embeds Z0 isometrically into any sequential Gromov–Hausdorff limit and proves surjectivity using H-center estimates plus the quantitative curvature-radius bound. The potentially largest singular stratum, arising from the cylindrical tangent flow S2×R^{2n−2}, is excluded by a holomorphic P1-deformation argument, yielding the codimension-four bound. For shrinkers, the pa

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-zero slice (Z0,dZ0) of the Ricci-flow spacetime completion, a canonical metric space built from conjugate heat-kernel measures and W1-Wasserstein distances, with a canonical radial function F(z)=dZ0(z,p̄)^2/4. For Kähler–Ricci shrinkers, the companion structure is the polarized Fano fibration π:X→Y, constructed from homogeneous holomorphic functions for the soliton vector field; a Schwarz-type estimate along this fibration yields local smooth convergence of the self-similar metrics to a Kähler cone metric. Kähler reduction by an S1-soliton action provides the volume noncollapsing estimates needed to establish local compactness of the time-zero slice.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the structure theory for noncollapsed Ricci flows—including weak compactness, center-distance estimates, and uniqueness of tangent flows—carries over unchanged to the noncompact self-similar flows generated by Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature.

What would settle it

Compute the Gromov–Hausdorff limit of the time slices for an explicit noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flow along two different time sequences and check whether the limits are isometric; if they differ, the uniqueness claim fails. Alternatively, find a tangent flow in the spacetime completion isometric to S2×R^{2n−2}, which the paper proves impossible by a holomorphic P1-deformation argument.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Time slices of a compact volume-noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flow converge to a unique Gromov–Hausdorff limit as the first singular time is approached.
  • The regular part of that limit is the complement of the null locus, and the singular set has Hausdorff dimension at most 2n−4.
  • A Kähler–Ricci shrinker is asymptotically conical exactly when its Fano fibration is biholomorphic outside a compact set.
  • For Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature, local compactness of the time-zero slice forces pointed Gromov–Hausdorff convergence of the self-similar flow to that slice, giving a unique tangent space at infinity.
  • Four-dimensional Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature, and Kähler–Ricci shrinkers with maximal volume growth, bounded scalar curvature, and an S1-soliton action, each have a unique Gromov–Hausdorff tangent space at infinity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The identification of singular-time limits with a time-zero slice suggests that spacetime completions may serve as canonical limit spaces for other degenerating geometric flows, not only Kähler–Ricci, wherever a comparable volume-noncollapsing estimate holds.
  • The codimension-four bound for the singular set matches the expected codimension behavior for shrinking solitons and may hold more generally if the cylindrical tangent flow can be excluded by non-Kähler mechanisms.
  • The asymptotic-conicality criterion gives a concrete algebraic check: a Kähler–Ricci shrinker is conical at infinity if and only if its Fano fibration is an isomorphism outside a compact set, a condition that can be verified from the fibration alone.
  • The principle that local compactness of the canonical slice upgrades pointwise distance limits to full GH convergence could be used as a general tool to prove uniqueness of tangent spaces for other self-similar flows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the metric geometry of finite-time singularities of noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flows and the geometry at infinity of Ricci shrinkers. For a compact noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flow approaching its first singular time, the authors prove that the time slices have a unique Gromov–Hausdorff limit, canonically isometric to the time-zero slice of the Ricci-flow spacetime completion, that the regular part is the complement of the null locus, and that the singular set has Hausdorff dimension at most 2n−4 (Theorems 1.1 and 1.2). For Kähler–Ricci shrinkers, they use the Fano fibration of Sun–Zhang to prove local smooth convergence to a Kähler cone metric on the isomorphism locus, characterize asymptotic conicality by biholomorphicity outside a compact set, and obtain uniqueness statements for asymptotically conical shrinkers (Theorems 1.3–1.5). They then develop a spacetime-completion approach for noncompact Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature, proving that local compactness of the time-zero slice implies pointed Gromov–Hausdorff convergence of the self-similar flow to that slice (Theorem 1.6). Applications include uniqueness of tangent spaces at infinity for Kähler–Ricci shrinkers with maximal volume growth, bounded scalar curvature, and an S^1 soliton action (Theorem 1.8), and for all four-dimensional Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature (Theorem 1.9).

Significance. If the results hold, they are substantial. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 answer a global uniqueness question for singular-time limits of noncollapsed Kähler–Ricci flows and give the expected codimension-four bound. Theorem 1.4 gives a clean complex-analytic criterion for asymptotic conicality, and Theorems 1.8 and 1.9 establish unique tangent spaces at infinity in broad classes where no such uniqueness was previously known. The paper is carefully structured and follows a coherent strategy: it combines the null-locus picture for Kähler currents, the Fano fibration construction, Kähler reduction, and the spacetime-completion theory. A notable strength is that many of the new statements are precise, falsifiable, and backed by detailed arguments rather than vague expectation. The central limitation is the heavy importation of structural theorems from the authors' own preprints and the asserted, rather than proved, extension of those theorems to noncompact shrinker flows; this is not an issue of circularity, but it is a load-bearing gap that must be addressed before the main applications can be considered fully verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, pp. 27–28] The extension of the entire FL25 spacetime-completion structure theory to noncompact shrinker flows is asserted, not proved. The text states that the heat kernel estimates in [LW20] and [LW24a] guarantee that the structure theory of [FL25a], [FL25b], and [FL25c] still holds in this setting, but the only explicit citation is [LW24a, Theorem 4.20] for [FL25a, Theorem 2.19]. The theorems actually used later include [FL25a, Lemma 3.13] (Lemma 5.3), [FL25a, Theorem 1.12(b)] (Propositions 5.11 and 8.9), [FL25b, Corollary 4.24] (Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 7.9), [FL25b, Theorem 6.31] (§8.4), and [FL25c, Theorems 1.2 and 8.15] (Theorems 3.2, 7.9, and 8.5). None of these are covered by the cited passage. In the compact setting, [FL25a] uses global diameter bounds; for a noncompact shrinker flow those bounds are absent, and the uniformity at spatial infinity of H-center constants, curvature-radius est
  2. [§4.2, Lemma 4.2] Lemma 4.2 is load-bearing for Corollary 4.3 and therefore for Theorems 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5, but it is only sketched as 'well-known to experts.' The sketch invokes the weighted Sobolev inequality [MW12, Lemma 3.2] and κ-noncollapsing at scale r_x=(1+ρ(x))^{-1}, but it does not verify all hypotheses at that scale or justify the claimed point-independent constants as r_x→0. Since the radius r_x shrinks at infinity, the uniformity of the mean-value estimate is not automatic. Please either expand the proof to a complete argument or give a precise reference with all hypotheses checked.
  3. [§8.4, equation (8.13)] The uniform L^1 scalar-curvature bound used in the generic-end packing argument is imported from [FL25b, Theorem 6.31], which is stated for four-dimensional closed Ricci flows. The text asserts 'the proof generalizes verbatim to four-dimensional Ricci flows with bounded curvature on each compact time interval' without giving the local version or its proof. This estimate controls the number of disjoint high-curvature regions of definite size, so it is a load-bearing step in Proposition 8.9 and hence in Theorem 1.9. Please include the local theorem with precise hypotheses and a proof, or a reference where the local statement appears.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 3.5, (3.12)] There is a stray closing parenthesis in 'dimH(𝑍sing0 ))' ; the formula should read dimH(𝑍sing0) ≤ 2𝑛−4.
  2. [§4.1 vs §5.1] The normalization of the soliton equation differs between sections: in §4.1, R_ω+|∇^{1,0}f|^2=f+n, while in §5.1, R+|∇f|^2=f. This makes comparisons such as F=1/4 d^2 in §5 versus r=√(2F_0) in Corollary 4.5 easy to misread. A short conversion table or a sentence reconciling the two conventions would improve readability.
  3. [Proposition 2.4] The notation 'H^{2n}-center' appears without explanation; earlier the paper uses 'H-center' with H a constant. Presumably H^{2n} is the same constant enlarged to dimension 2n, but the notation should be defined or avoided.
  4. [Remark 5.8] Remark 5.8 is a digression about compact type-I flows and is not used in the paper. It could be shortened or moved to a later section so as not to interrupt the noncompact shrinker discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No definitional circularity; heavy reliance on co-authored spacetime-completion preprints is a provenance/correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivations do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The spacetime distance d* and the time-zero slice (Z0,d^{Z0}) are defined independently in §2.1/§5.1 from conjugate heat-kernel Wasserstein distances, and Theorem 1.1 identifies the Gromov–Hausdorff limit with this slice using volume lower bounds, H-center estimates and curvature-radius estimates; the conclusion is not assumed in the definition. Theorem 1.3 derives the Kähler cone limit from polynomial growth of homogeneous holomorphic functions and the Schwarz estimate, not from the asserted limit. Theorem 1.6 is a conditional statement whose hypotheses are later verified by independent volume estimates (Theorem 7.3) or end-structure arguments (§8). The main caveat is §5.1, where the paper asserts, rather than proves, that the entire structure theory of [FL25a,b,c] extends verbatim to noncompact shrinker flows, citing heat-kernel work [LW20,LW24a] with overlapping authorship. This is load-bearing for Theorems 1.6, 1.8 and 1.9, and it is a genuine correctness/provenance risk, but it is not circular: those cited results are parameter-free structural theorems with stated assumptions, and the present proofs add substantial Kähler/shrinker-specific arguments. Accordingly, the paper is not circular; the score reflects the unusually heavy dependence on co-authored preprints and the asserted noncompact extension, not a definitional or fitted-input circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 9 axioms · 0 invented entities

No fitted or hand-tuned parameters appear: all constants depend on n, the entropy bound Y, the scalar curvature bound C0, or the flow, and are not tuned to a target result. The central claims rest on a set of powerful background results, mostly from [FL25a,b,c] and [SZ24], that are treated as axioms here; the most consequential is the applicability of the spacetime-completion structure theory in the noncompact shrinker setting.

axioms (9)
  • domain assumption The noncollapsed Ricci-flow spacetime-completion structure theory of [FL25a] (weak compactness, H-center estimates, curvature-radius estimates, regular–singular decomposition) extends to noncompact Ricci flows induced by Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature.
    Invoked throughout Sections 5–8 to define (Z0,dZ0) and control limits; asserted via heat-kernel estimates [LW20, LW24a] rather than proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Quantitative stratification and singular-set codimension estimates of [FL25b, Corollary 4.24].
    Used in Theorem 3.5 to bound the Hausdorff dimension of the singular set of Z0.
  • domain assumption Strong uniqueness of tangent flows at cylindrical singularities [FL25c, Theorem 1.2].
    Used in Theorem 3.2 to control the volume of holomorphic P^1-fibers along the flow.
  • domain assumption Sun–Zhang polarized Fano fibration structure [SZ24, Section 3] for every Kähler–Ricci shrinker.
    Foundation of Section 4 and the Kähler-reduction volume estimates in Section 7.
  • standard math Collins–Tosatti null-locus characterization and smooth convergence off Null(α) [CT15, Theorem 4.1].
    Justifies identification of the regular part with X^\circ in Theorem 1.1 (§2.2).
  • standard math Heat-kernel estimates and noncollapsing for Ricci shrinkers [LW20, Theorem 22; LW24a, Corollary 5.6].
    Provides H-center estimates and volume bounds used in Sections 5–8.
  • domain assumption Diameter and volume noncollapsing estimates for compact Kähler metrics [GPSS23, GPSS24b, GT25, Vu26].
    Yields (1.4)–(1.5), the global compactness of the time slices in the compact case.
  • standard math Three-dimensional Ricci-shrinker classification [Ham95, Nab10, NW08].
    Used in Proposition 8.1 to conclude uniqueness of tangent flows in real dimension four.
  • standard math Kawamata base-point-freeness and semiampleness of the Q-line bundle L.
    Used in Section 7.2 to construct the semiample fibration for Kähler reduction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 53905 in / 12827 out tokens · 124964 ms · 2026-08-01T01:48:16.776511+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the metric geometry of finite-time singularities of volume-noncollapsed K\"ahler-Ricci flows and the geometry at infinity of Ricci shrinkers. For a compact volume-noncollapsed K\"ahler-Ricci flow approaching its first singular time, we prove that the time slices converge to a unique Gromov-Hausdorff limit, canonically identified with the time-zero slice of the Ricci-flow spacetime completion. Its regular part is identified with the complement of the null locus, and we show that the singular set has Hausdorff codimension at least four. For K\"ahler-Ricci shrinkers, we relate the geometry at infinity to the associated Fano fibration. We prove local smooth convergence to a K\"ahler cone metric on the locus where the fibration is biholomorphic, and characterize asymptotic conicality by biholomorphicity outside a compact set. For Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature, we show that local compactness of the time-zero slice implies pointed Gromov-Hausdorff convergence of the full self-similar flow to that slice. As applications, we prove uniqueness of the tangent space at infinity for K\"ahler-Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature and Euclidean volume growth whose soliton vector field generates an $S^1$-action, and for all four-dimensional Ricci shrinkers with bounded scalar curvature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    2012 , isbn =

    Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon , title =. 2012 , isbn =

  2. [2]

    Bamler, R. H. , journal =. Structure theory of non-collapsed limits of

  3. [3]

    Bamler, R. H. , journal=. Compactness theory of the space of super. 2023 , publisher=

  4. [4]

    , booktitle =

    Cao, H.-D. , booktitle =. Existence of gradient

  5. [5]

    and Zhou, D

    Cao, H.-D. and Zhou, D. , journal =. On complete gradient shrinking

  6. [6]

    , journal =

    Chen, B.-L. , journal =. Strong uniqueness of the. 2009 , doi =

  7. [7]

    and Chiu, S.-K

    Chen, Y. and Chiu, S.-K. and Hallgren, M. and Sz. On. arXiv:2502.09825 , year =

  8. [8]

    and Chu, S.-C

    Chow, B. and Chu, S.-C. and Glickenstein, D. and Guenther, C. and Isenberg, J. and Ivey, T. and Knopf, D. and Lu, P. and Luo, F. and Ni, L. , series =. The

  9. [9]

    and Lu, P

    Chow, B. and Lu, P. and Yang, B. , journal =. A necessary and sufficient condition for

  10. [10]

    , journal =

    Cifarelli, C. , journal =. Explicit complete

  11. [11]

    and Conlon, R

    Cifarelli, C. and Conlon, R. J. and Deruelle, A. , journal =. On finite time. 2026 , doi =

  12. [12]

    Surveys in Differential Geometry , volume =

    The min-max construction of minimal surfaces , author =. Surveys in Differential Geometry , volume =. 2003 , doi =

  13. [13]

    Collins, T. C. and Tosatti, V. , journal =

  14. [14]

    Conlon, R. J. and Deruelle, A. and Sun, S. , journal =. Classification results for expanding and shrinking gradient

  15. [15]

    Dancer, A. S. and Wang, M. Y. , journal =. On. 2011 , doi =

  16. [16]

    and Li, Y

    Dong, C. and Li, Y. , journal =. Non-collapsing of. 2026 , doi =

  17. [17]

    Enders, J. and M. On. Communications in Analysis and Geometry , volume =

  18. [18]

    , journal =

    Esparza, C. , journal =. Uniqueness of asymptotically conical shrinking gradient

  19. [19]

    and Li, Y

    Fang, H. and Li, Y. , journal =. Strong uniqueness of tangent flows at cylindrical singularities in

  20. [20]

    and Li, Y

    Fang, H. and Li, Y. , journal =. Singular sets in noncollapsed

  21. [21]

    and Li, Y

    Fang, H. and Li, Y. , journal =. On the structure of noncollapsed

  22. [22]

    and Ilmanen, T

    Feldman, M. and Ilmanen, T. and Knopf, D. , journal =. Rotationally symmetric shrinking and expanding gradient. 2003 , doi =

  23. [23]

    , journal =

    Futaki, A. , journal =. The

  24. [24]

    and Wang, M.-T

    Futaki, A. and Wang, M.-T. , journal =. Constructing. 2011 , doi =

  25. [25]

    , journal =

    Futaki, A. , journal =. Irregular. 2021 , doi =

  26. [26]

    , journal =

    Grauert, H. , journal =

  27. [27]

    Guedj, V. and T. Journal de l'\'Ecole polytechnique---Math\'ematiques , volume =. 2025 , doi =

  28. [28]

    and Phong, D

    Guo, B. and Phong, D. H. and Song, J. and Sturm, J. , journal =. Sobolev inequalities on

  29. [29]

    and Phong, D

    Guo, B. and Phong, D. H. and Song, J. and Sturm, J. , journal =. Diameter estimates in. 2024 , doi =

  30. [30]

    Hacon, C. D. and McKernan, J. , journal =. On. 2007 , doi =

  31. [31]

    and Jian, W

    Hallgren, M. and Jian, W. , journal =. Tangent flows of. 2023 , doi =

  32. [32]

    Hamilton, R. S. , journal =. Deformation of complex structures on manifolds with boundary

  33. [33]

    Hamilton, R. S. , journal =. The formation of singularities in the

  34. [34]

    Haslhofer, R. and M. A compactness theorem for complete. Geometric and Functional Analysis , volume =. 2011 , doi =

  35. [35]

    , journal =

    Hwang, J.-M. , journal =. An application of

  36. [36]

    , booktitle =

    Koiso, N. , booktitle =. On rotationally symmetric. 1990 , doi =

  37. [37]

    and Wang, L

    Kotschwar, B. and Wang, L. , journal =. Rigidity of asymptotically conical shrinking gradient. 2015 , doi =

  38. [38]

    , journal =

    Li, C. , journal =. On rotationally symmetric

  39. [39]

    and Wang, B

    Li, Y. and Wang, B. , journal =. Heat kernel on. 2020 , doi =

  40. [40]

    and Tosatti, V

    Li, Y. and Tosatti, V. , journal =. On the collapsing of

  41. [41]

    and Wang, B

    Li, Y. and Wang, B. , journal =. Heat kernel on. 2024 , doi =

  42. [42]

    and Wang, B

    Li, Y. and Wang, B. , journal =. Rigidity of the round cylinders in. 2024 , doi =

  43. [43]

    and Wang, B

    Li, Y. and Wang, B. , journal =. On. 2026 , doi =

  44. [44]

    Second order parabolic differential equations , author =

  45. [45]

    and Wang, J

    Munteanu, O. and Wang, J. , journal =. Analysis of weighted. 2012 , doi =

  46. [46]

    and Wang, J

    Munteanu, O. and Wang, J. , journal =. Geometry of shrinking

  47. [47]

    and Wang, J

    Munteanu, O. and Wang, J. , journal =. Conical structure for shrinking

  48. [48]

    and Wang, J

    Munteanu, O. and Wang, J. , journal =. Structure at infinity for shrinking. 2019 , doi =

  49. [49]

    Journal f

    Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature , author =. Journal f

  50. [50]

    Mathematical Research Letters , volume =

    On a classification of gradient shrinking solitons , author =. Mathematical Research Letters , volume =

  51. [51]

    , journal =

    Perelman, G. , journal =. Finite extinction time for the solutions to the

  52. [52]

    , journal =

    Perelman, G. , journal =

  53. [53]

    2006 , doi =

    Riemannian Geometry , author =. 2006 , doi =

  54. [54]

    , journal =

    Scharrer, C. , journal =. Some geometric inequalities for varifolds on. 2022 , doi =

  55. [55]

    and Weinkove, B

    Sherman, M. and Weinkove, B. , journal =. Interior derivative estimates for the

  56. [56]

    Lectures on geometric measure theory , author =

  57. [57]

    and Weinkove, B

    Song, J. and Weinkove, B. , booktitle =. An introduction to the. 2013 , doi =

  58. [58]

    and Tian, G

    Song, J. and Tian, G. , journal =. The. 2017 , doi =

  59. [59]

    and Zhang, R

    Sun, S. and Zhang, R. , journal =. Complex structure degenerations and collapsing of

  60. [60]

    and Zhang, J

    Sun, S. and Zhang, J. , journal =

  61. [61]

    arXiv:2505.14939 , year =

    Sz. arXiv:2505.14939 , year =

  62. [62]

    and Zhu, X

    Tian, G. and Zhu, X. , journal =. A new holomorphic invariant and uniqueness of. 2002 , doi =

  63. [63]

    , journal =

    Vu, D.-V. , journal =. Uniform diameter and non-collapsing estimates for. 2026 , doi =

  64. [64]

    , journal =

    Wang, L. , journal =. On the regularity theory of fully nonlinear parabolic equations:

  65. [65]

    and Wang, Y

    Wang, J. and Wang, Y. , journal =. Rigidity and -regularity theorems of. 2025 , doi =

  66. [66]

    , journal =

    Wu, X. , journal =. On compact

  67. [67]

    , journal =

    Yang, B. , journal =. A characterization of noncompact. 2012 , doi =

  68. [68]

    , journal =

    Zhang, Z. , journal =. Scalar curvature behavior for finite-time singularity of

  69. [69]

    , journal =

    Zhang, Z. , journal =

  70. [70]

    and Zhu, X.-P

    Chen, B.-L. and Zhu, X.-P. , journal=. Uniqueness of the. 2006 , publisher=