Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 191 references

This paper claims that anisotropic secondary bias of dark matter haloes is driven by spin and elongation rather than formation history or concentration, and that matching halo-environment alignment removes the directional signal while match

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:51 UTC pith:C3AVTH4N

load-bearing objection A careful, honest measurement of orientation-dependent secondary bias with a genuinely new decomposition; the headline OSB/ASB split is plausible but rests on asymmetric controls and visual inspection, so it needs a joint control test before the clean physical separation is claimed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26009 v1 pith:C3AVTH4N submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Anisotropic Secondary Bias of Dark Matter Haloes in a ΛCDM Universe

Qinglin Ma , Cheng Li This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords secondary biasassembly biasdark matter haloeshalo spinhalo shapetidal anisotropyhalo alignmentlarge-scale structure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Dark matter haloes with the same mass cluster differently depending on internal properties, and this paper asks whether that dependence changes with direction relative to each halo's long axis. Using a large dark-matter-only cosmological simulation at redshift zero, it finds that the orientation-averaged version of the effect is mostly explained by the local tidal anisotropy of the environment, but the directional version is not. Instead, anisotropic secondary bias is carried by halo spin and minor-to-major axis ratio: slowly rotating and more elongated haloes align more strongly with the cosmic filamentary structure. Matching haloes by their alignment with the surrounding structure erases much of this directional signal, whereas matching tidal anisotropy or the outer matter axis ratio leaves it intact. The paper concludes that ordinary and anisotropic secondary bias are controlled by different environmental descriptors, and that halo definition matters mainly for low-mass spin bias through the inclusion of unbound particles.

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is a separation of environmental controls. Ordinary, orientation-averaged secondary bias of haloes at fixed mass is substantially suppressed when the sample is matched in tidal anisotropy α, a scalar measure of the smoothed tidal field's anisotropy. Anisotropic secondary bias—the dependence of clustering on direction relative to the halo major axis—is largely insensitive to tidal anisotropy and to the anisotropy amplitude of the outer matter distribution, but is strongly reduced when haloes are matched by the alignment between their major axis and the surrounding density or tidal field. The spin (both bound-particle and all-particle definitions) and th

What carries the argument

The central objects are three operational environmental descriptors: halo-environment alignment (the density ratio n∥/n⊥ and the tidal-field alignment A·e3), outer matter anisotropy (the minor-to-major axis ratio c/a in the shell from two to four virial radii), and tidal anisotropy α defined from the Hessian of the gravitational potential smoothed on a halo-dependent scale. The carrying mechanism is the matched-control test: at fixed halo mass, the distributions of a candidate descriptor are equalised between property-selected quartile samples and the full sample, and the pair counts are then recomputed in directions parallel and perpendicular to the halo major axis using the alignment corre

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions rest on the assumption that matching a single scalar environmental descriptor at fixed halo mass is a valid way to isolate its physical influence; the paper itself cautions that these are single-descriptor tests, not causal interventions, so a correlated multivariate environmental mechanism could mimic the observed separation.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to repeat the matching tests with a multivariate control—simultaneously matching tidal anisotropy and halo-environment alignment—and see whether the anisotropic spin and shape signals survive; if they are erased, the claimed physical separation is an artifact of the chosen descriptors. Another direct test would be measuring anisotropic secondary bias with a different tidal smoothing scale (not four virial radii) or a different outer-matter aperture; a different aperture that removes the alignment-induced suppression would likewise undermine the interpretation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Tidal anisotropy is the dominant environmental control of ordinary secondary bias across the six halo properties studied, but it leaves anisotropic secondary bias intact.
  • Halo-environment alignment is the descriptor that traces and partly absorbs the spin- and elongation-dependent anisotropic secondary bias.
  • The anisotropy amplitude of the outer matter distribution, measured independently of the halo major axis, does not by itself generate either ordinary or anisotropic secondary bias.
  • Galaxy–halo models that link galaxy properties to halo spin or shape will inherit an orientation-dependent clustering signal, whereas models using concentration or formation time will carry much less of it.
  • Halo definition primarily affects low-mass spin bias through the inclusion of unbound particles, while the anisotropic secondary-bias trends are robust across halo definitions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the control tests are single-descriptor, the attribution of anisotropic secondary bias to halo-environment alignment could be an artifact of correlated variables; a multivariate control that simultaneously matches tidal anisotropy and alignment would test whether alignment remains necessary once tidal anisotropy is fixed.
  • If the alignment-tracing result carries over to hydrodynamic simulations, then galaxy samples selected by disk-dominated rotation or elongated stellar shapes should show stronger orientation-dependent clustering than samples selected by stellar age or concentration—a testable observational prediction.
  • The direction-dependent low-mass spin inversion suggests that any observational spin proxy based on a different particle aperture could flip the sign of inferred spin bias in dense environments, because unbound material raises the all-particle spin of some haloes whose bound spin is low.
  • A minimal extension would measure the same alignment correlation statistics around the halo minor axis to check whether the anisotropic signal is specific to the major-axis frame or reflects a more general orientation-dependent bias.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses the z=0 TNG300-1-Dark simulation to measure ordinary secondary bias (OSB) and anisotropic secondary bias (ASB) of dark matter haloes at fixed halo mass, for six halo properties: formation time, concentration, two spin definitions, minor-to-major axis ratio, and triaxiality. It compares three environmental descriptors—halo-environment alignment (A·e3, n∥/n⊥), outer matter anisotropy (c/a(4Rvir)), and tidal anisotropy (α)—as matched controls. The main claims are that (i) OSB is substantially suppressed by matching tidal anisotropy but not by matching halo-environment alignment or outer matter anisotropy; (ii) ASB is strong for spin and axis ratio, weak for formation time, concentration, and triaxiality; (iii) matching A·e3 substantially reduces spin- and shape-dependent ASB, while matching α or c/a leaves it largely intact; and (iv) halo definition affects spin OSB but has little impact on ASB. The paper interprets these results as evidence that OSB and ASB are governed by different environmental projections of the same anisotropic large-scale structure formation process.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful and nontrivial discrimination: the scalar, orientation-averaged secondary bias is tied to tidal anisotropy, whereas the directional anisotropic secondary bias is tied to halo-environment alignment. This distinction is relevant for galaxy-halo modeling, intrinsic alignment, and redshift-space-distortion systematics. The analysis has notable strengths: it uses a public simulation, standard estimators (ACF, quartile subsamples, bootstrap errors), explicitly discloses limitations (single z=0 DMO simulation, high-mass sample variance, methodological choices), and includes a halo-definition robustness check with two spin definitions that isolates unbound-particle effects. The measurements themselves appear internally consistent. However, the principal environmental-control comparison is under-validated: the one-at-a-time matching is asymmetric, and the key conclusions in Fig. 4 rest on visual assessment without quantitative significance tests. The significance of the paper is therefore contingent on additional control tests and quantitative support.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (13), Fig. 4] The central asymmetry claim—that matching A·e3 reduces ASB while matching α or c/a leaves it intact—is based on one-at-a-time matching, but the controls are not symmetric. A·e3 is defined from the halo major axis and the tidal eigenvector e3, so it directly encodes the orientation used to define ASB, whereas α (Eq. 7) and c/a(4Rvir) are orientation-blind scalars. If the true mechanism is multivariate (e.g., α determines which haloes are in filaments while A·e3 determines how their axes point), then matching A·e3 alone can reduce ASB while α alone cannot, even if both are necessary. The paper acknowledges this as 'single-descriptor tests' in §4.1, but the abstract and conclusions present a clean physical separation. A joint-matching test (e.g., match α at fixed A·e3, or match both simultaneously) is required to rule out that the asymmetry is an artifact of descriptor choice.
  2. [Fig. 4] The statements 'substantially reduces' and 'largely intact' are supported only by visual inspection. There is no quantitative threshold, no bootstrap test of whether the residual ASB after A·e3 matching is consistent with zero, and no test of whether the α-conditioned curves preserve the parallel/perpendicular separation within errors. Please add a quantitative summary statistic, e.g., the integrated |b^{S,θ}_S(parallel) − b^{S,θ}_S(perpendicular)| over the mass range with bootstrap confidence intervals, and report per-mass-bin significance. This is essential because the high-mass bins, which carry much of the orientation signal, are also the most affected by sample variance as acknowledged in §4.1.
  3. [§2.5/§3.1/§3.3, matching procedure] The conclusion that a descriptor 'absorbs' or 'leaves intact' ASB depends on the matched samples actually having identical Ξ distributions. The text states that matching uses 10 bins per mass bin, but no diagnostic is shown (e.g., KS tests or quantile-quantile plots before/after matching), and no sensitivity to the number of bins is given. Since A·e3 has a strongly concentrated distribution, imperfect matching could in principle produce the apparent reduction. Please include matching diagnostics and a bin-count robustness check so that the 'matched' condition can be verified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.5, Eq. (9)] The notation in Eq. (9) is confusing: NR/NR and QR/QR use identical symbols for different quantities. Please clarify which counts are for the reference sample, the random catalogue, and the cross-pairs, and define all pair-count labels explicitly.
  2. [Appendix A and B] Several claimed checks are not shown: 'Matching n∥/n⊥ gives the same qualitative result' (§3.1), the outer-matter/tidal alignment |A_4Rvir·e3| control, and the statement that SubFind does not alter the qualitative ASB conclusions. Either include these figures or state clearly in the text that they are available upon request, so the claims can be verified.
  3. [Fig. 3] The Spearman rank correlation curves in Fig. 3 are shown without error bars, although the text refers to bootstrap uncertainties. Please add error bars or shaded regions to the figure, or state explicitly that the uncertainties are smaller than the curve widths.
  4. [Abstract and §3.2] The abstract's phrase 'spin- and shape-dependent ASB signals' could be misinterpreted: the shape signal is specifically the minor-to-major axis ratio c/a, while triaxiality shows no significant ASB. Please specify 'axis ratio' instead of 'shape' where appropriate, or note that triaxiality is excluded from this statement.
  5. [§2.3, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) writes f(c_vmax) on the left but f(rmax/rs) on the right; the relationship between c_vmax and rmax/rs should be stated explicitly to avoid apparent inconsistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the OSB/ASB results are measured conditional correlations against public TNG data; self-citations to Q. Ma et al. (2026) are reproduced in this paper and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical and self-contained: every central quantity is measured from the public TNG300-1-Dark simulation with standard estimators (relative bias Eq. 8, ACF Eq. 9, conditioned statistics Eqs. 12-13). No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction. The OSB baseline, the ASB measurements, and the matched-control comparisons are all conditional correlation measurements, and the paper openly reports that two of three controls fail (matching outer matter anisotropy and tidal anisotropy leaves ASB largely intact), so the tests have discriminating power. The main self-citations to Q. Ma et al. (2026) concern the bound-vs-all-particle spin definitions and the low-mass spin-bias inversion; the present paper reproduces those trends in its own Figure 1 and Appendix B rather than importing them as unverified input. The use of A·e3 as an ASB control is not circular by construction: A·e3 is a separate environmental descriptor, and the ASB statistics are not algebraic functions of it; the concern that A·e3 is geometrically closer to the ASB definition is a statistical/causal-limitation issue, which Section 4.1 explicitly acknowledges ('these conditioning tests should be interpreted as single-descriptor tests rather than complete causal interventions'). No equation-level reduction, renamed fit, or author-imported uniqueness theorem is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the TNG300-1-Dark simulation as a faithful ΛCDM universe, on the standard reduced-inertia-tensor shape estimates that define the halo major axis, and on the operational definitions of the three environmental descriptors. The matched-control inference treats a single scalar environmental descriptor as the controlling variable at fixed mass — a domain assumption the paper itself qualifies as a single-descriptor test rather than a causal intervention. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Tidal-field smoothing scale = 4 Rvir (chosen)
    Gaussian kernel smoothing of the density field; this choice determines the tidal anisotropy α and hence the OSB-control conclusion (§2.4, §4.1).
  • Angular threshold for parallel/perpendicular = 45°
    Pairs with θ<45° vs θ>45° define 'parallel' and 'perpendicular'; changing this threshold changes the ASB amplitude (§2.5).
  • Outer-matter shell aperture = 2Rvir < r < 4Rvir
    Defines outer matter anisotropy c/a(4Rvir); alternative apertures could alter the null result for ASB (§2.4).
  • Pair-separation range for bias averaging = 5–12 h^-1 Mpc
    Relative bias and ASB are averaged over this range, affecting signal-to-noise and measured amplitude (§2.5).
  • Matching bin count = 10
    Number of bins used to match the environmental descriptor Ξ between subsamples in the matched-control tests (§3.1).
  • Halo mass range = 10^10.7 – 10^14 h^-1 M_sun
    Lower limit ensures at least 1000 particles per halo; upper end is sample-variance limited (§2.5).
  • Secondary-property quartiles = upper/lower 25%
    Subsample definition for all bias measurements; results could depend on the quantile choice (§2.5).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption TNG300-1-Dark simulation provides a faithful z=0 ΛCDM representation of halo formation and clustering
    All results are measurements from this single simulation (§2.1); no test of redshift evolution or cosmological parameter variation.
  • domain assumption The reduced inertia tensor (Allgood et al. 2006), iterated with elliptical weighting, yields reliable halo axes and shapes
    The halo major axis is the reference direction for all ASB measurements (§2.3).
  • domain assumption The deformation tensor Hessian with a halo-dependent 4Rvir Gaussian kernel captures the relevant large-scale tidal environment
    Tidal anisotropy α and alignment A·e3 are derived from this field; the control-test conclusions depend on this scale (§2.4).
  • domain assumption Matching a single scalar environmental descriptor Ξ at fixed mass isolates the effect of that descriptor on clustering
    The paper uses this to attribute OSB to tidal anisotropy and ASB to alignment; it notes these are single-descriptor tests, not causal interventions (§4.1).
  • standard math Bootstrap resampling (50 realisations) plus Poisson errors yields reliable uncertainties for the bias ratios
    Standard error estimation; however 50 bootstrap realizations is modest for the highest-mass bins (§2.5).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17327 in / 14444 out tokens · 125870 ms · 2026-08-01T00:51:19.161901+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Secondary bias is the dependence of halo clustering on properties beyond halo mass. Using the $z=0$ TNG300-1-Dark simulation, we study anisotropic secondary bias (ASB): the variation of secondary bias with direction relative to the halo major axis. We first use ordinary, orientation-averaged secondary bias (OSB) as a baseline to compare three environmental manifestations: halo-environment alignment, outer matter anisotropy, and tidal anisotropy. Matching tidal anisotropy suppresses much of the OSB, whereas matching halo-environment alignment or outer matter anisotropy does not. ASB behaves differently. It is weak for formation time, concentration, and triaxiality, but strong for both spin definitions and minor-to-major axis ratio; slowly rotating and more elongated haloes are more strongly aligned with filamentary structure. Matching halo-environment alignment substantially reduces the spin- and shape-dependent ASB signals, whereas matching tidal anisotropy or the outer matter axis ratio leaves them largely intact. Halo definition has little impact on ASB, yet strongly affects low-mass spin bias: including unbound particles can move dense-environment haloes with low bound-particle spin into the high all-particle-spin sample. These results clarify which clustering signals are associated with halo-environment alignment, matter anisotropy, or tidal anisotropy, and which are sensitive to halo definition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26009 by Cheng Li, Qinglin Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Three environmental controls of OSB. Rows show secondary bias before and after controlling for halo-environment alignment A · e3 (upper), outer matter anisotropy c/a(4Rvir) (middle), and tidal anisotropy α (lower). Columns, from left to right, show zform, cvmax, λb, λa, c/a, and T. Red and blue denote the upper and lower 25% subsamples of each halo property, respectively. Solid curves with filled circles s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Anisotropic secondary bias as a function of halo mass. Columns, from left to right, show formation redshift zform, concentration cvmax, bound-particle spin λb, all-particle spin λa, minor-to-major axis ratio c/a, and triaxiality T. Upper panels show b S,θ S , the orientation-dependent clustering normalized by the secondary-property-selected sample; lower panels show b S,θ θ , the secondary-bias signal meas… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spearman rank correlations between halo secondary properties and halo-environment alignment measures as a function of halo mass. The left panel uses the density-alignment ratio n∥/n⊥, and the right panel uses the absolute alignment A · e3 ≡ |A · e3| between the halo major axis and the slowest-collapse direction of the tidal field. In both panels, red, orange, olive, green, cyan, and blue curves show correl… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three environmental controls of ASB. Rows show b S,θ S before and after controlling for halo-environment alignment A · e3 (top), outer matter anisotropy c/a(4Rvir) (middle), and tidal anisotropy α (bottom). Columns, from left to right, show zform, cvmax, λb, λa, c/a, and T. Solid curves show the original ASB measurements, and open diamonds show the corresponding measurements after matching the row-specific… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

191 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2021, title Cosmological simulation in tides: power spectra, halo shape responses, and shape assembly bias , , 2021, 041, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/041

    Akitsu , K., Li , Y., & Okumura , T. 2021, title Cosmological simulation in tides: power spectra, halo shape responses, and shape assembly bias , , 2021, 041, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/041

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/041 2021

  2. [3]

    2005, title Internal and External Alignment of the Shapes and Angular Momenta of CDM Halos , , 627, 647, 10.1086/430397

    Bailin , J., & Steinmetz , M. 2005, title Internal and External Alignment of the Shapes and Angular Momenta of CDM Halos , , 627, 647, 10.1086/430397

    doi:10.1086/430397 2005

  3. [4]

    D., & Favole , G

    Balaguera-Antol \' nez , A., Montero-Dorta , A. D., & Favole , G. 2024, title Secondary halo bias through cosmic time. I. Scaling relations and the connection with the cosmic web , , 685, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348694

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348694 2024

  4. [5]

    S., Wechsler , R

    Behroozi , P. S., Wechsler , R. H., & Wu , H.-Y. 2013, title The ROCKSTAR Phase-space Temporal Halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores , , 762, 109, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/109

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/109 2013

  5. [6]

    Benson , A. J. 2017, title Constraining the noise-free distribution of halo spin parameters , , 471, 2871, 10.1093/mnras/stx1804

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1804 2017

  6. [7]

    2017, title ZOMG - I

    Borzyszkowski , M., Porciani , C., Romano-D \' az , E., & Garaldi , E. 2017, title ZOMG - I. How the cosmic web inhibits halo growth and generates assembly bias , , 469, 594, 10.1093/mnras/stx873

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx873 2017

  7. [8]

    L., & Norman , M

    Bryan , G. L., & Norman , M. L. 1998, title Statistical Properties of X-Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons , , 495, 80, 10.1086/305262

    doi:10.1086/305262 1998

  8. [10]

    I., & Luo , Y

    Chen , H.-Z., Kang , X., Wang , P., Libeskind , N. I., & Luo , Y. 2021, title Cosmic Web-halo Connection between Twin Universes , , 920, 89, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac126c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac126c 2021

  9. [11]

    J., Li , C., et al

    Chen , Y., Mo , H. J., Li , C., et al. 2020, title Relating the Structure of Dark Matter Halos to Their Assembly and Environment , , 899, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba597

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba597 2020

  10. [12]

    2019, title Detecting galaxy-filament alignments in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III , , 485, 2492, 10.1093/mnras/stz539

    Chen , Y.-C., Ho , S., Blazek , J., et al. 2019, title Detecting galaxy-filament alignments in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III , , 485, 2492, 10.1093/mnras/stz539

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz539 2019

  11. [15]

    R., & Shirokov , A

    Dalal , N., White , M., Bond , J. R., & Shirokov , A. 2008, title Halo Assembly Bias in Hierarchical Structure Formation , , 687, 12, 10.1086/591512

    doi:10.1086/591512 2008

  12. [17]

    2021, title Flybys, Orbits, Splashback: Subhalos and the Importance of the Halo Boundary , , 909, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd947

    Diemer , B. 2021, title Flybys, Orbits, Splashback: Subhalos and the Importance of the Halo Boundary , , 909, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd947

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd947 2021

  13. [18]

    2023, title A dynamics-based density profile for dark haloes - II

    Diemer , B. 2023, title A dynamics-based density profile for dark haloes - II. Fitting function , , 519, 3292, 10.1093/mnras/stac3778

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3778 2023

  14. [19]

    Faltenbacher , A., Li , C., White , S. D. M., et al. 2009, title Alignment between galaxies and large-scale structure , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9, 41, 10.1088/1674-4527/9/1/004

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/9/1/004 2009

  15. [20]

    Faltenbacher , A., & White , S. D. M. 2010, title Assembly Bias and the Dynamical Structure of Dark Matter Halos , , 708, 469, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/469

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/469 2010

  16. [21]

    E., Mao , Y.-Y., Zentner , A

    Fielder , C. E., Mao , Y.-Y., Zentner , A. R., et al. 2020, title Illuminating dark matter halo density profiles without subhaloes , , 499, 2426, 10.1093/mnras/staa2851

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2851 2020

  17. [23]

    Ganeshaiah Veena , P., Cautun , M., van de Weygaert , R., Tempel , E., & Frenk , C. S. 2021, title Cosmic Ballet III: Halo spin evolution in the cosmic web , , 503, 2280, 10.1093/mnras/stab411

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab411 2021

  18. [24]

    2018, title The Cosmic Ballet: spin and shape alignments of haloes in the cosmic web , , 481, 414, 10.1093/mnras/sty2270

    Ganeshaiah Veena , P., Cautun , M., van de Weygaert , R., et al. 2018, title The Cosmic Ballet: spin and shape alignments of haloes in the cosmic web , , 481, 414, 10.1093/mnras/sty2270

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2270 2018

  19. [27]

    2023, title A Better Way to Define Dark Matter Haloes , , 521, 2464, 10.1093/mnras/stad660

    Garcia , R., Salazar , E., Rozo , E., et al. 2023, title A Better Way to Define Dark Matter Haloes , , 521, 2464, 10.1093/mnras/stad660

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad660 2023

  20. [28]

    2023, title The MillenniumTNG Project: Refining the one-halo model of red and blue galaxies at different redshifts , , 524, 2524, 10.1093/mnras/stad279

    Hadzhiyska , B., Hernquist , L., Eisenstein , D., et al. 2023, title The MillenniumTNG Project: Refining the one-halo model of red and blue galaxies at different redshifts , , 524, 2524, 10.1093/mnras/stad279

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad279 2023

  21. [31]

    2019, title The multidimensional dependence of halo bias in the eye of a machine: a tale of halo structure, assembly, and environment , , 482, 1900, 10.1093/mnras/sty2822

    Han , J., Li , Y., Jing , Y., et al. 2019, title The multidimensional dependence of halo bias in the eye of a machine: a tale of halo structure, assembly, and environment , , 482, 1900, 10.1093/mnras/sty2822

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2822 2019

  22. [32]

    P., & Watson , D

    Hearin , A. P., & Watson , D. F. 2013, title The dark side of galaxy colour , , 435, 1313, 10.1093/mnras/stt1374

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1374 2013

  23. [33]

    P., Zentner , A

    Hearin , A. P., Zentner , A. R., van den Bosch , F. C., Campbell , D., & Tollerud , E. 2016, title Introducing decorated HODs: modelling assembly bias in the galaxy-halo connection , , 460, 2552, 10.1093/mnras/stw840

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw840 2016

  24. [36]

    P., Suto , Y., & Mo , H

    Jing , Y. P., Suto , Y., & Mo , H. J. 2007, title The Dependence of Dark Halo Clustering on Formation Epoch and Concentration Parameter , , 657, 664, 10.1086/511130

    doi:10.1086/511130 2007

  25. [37]

    D., et al

    Joachimi , B., Cacciato , M., Kitching , T. D., et al. 2015, title Galaxy Alignments: An Overview , , 193, 1, 10.1007/s11214-015-0177-4

    doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0177-4 2015

  26. [38]

    Karp , J. S. M., Lange , J. U., & Wechsler , R. H. 2023, title Anisotropic Satellite Galaxy Quenching: A Unique Signature of Energetic Feedback by Supermassive Black Holes? , , 949, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd3e9

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd3e9 2023

  27. [39]

    2015, title Galaxy Alignments: Theory, Modelling & Simulations , , 193, 67, 10.1007/s11214-015-0203-6

    Kiessling , A., Cacciato , M., Joachimi , B., et al. 2015, title Galaxy Alignments: Theory, Modelling & Simulations , , 193, 67, 10.1007/s11214-015-0203-6

    doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0203-6 2015

  28. [40]

    D., Smith , R., & Shinn , J.-H

    Kim , Y., Montero-Dorta , A. D., Smith , R., & Shinn , J.-H. 2025, title Towards an Observational Detection of Halo Spin Bias using Spin-Orbit Coherence , , 700, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/202555345

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555345 2025

  29. [41]

    A., Trujillo-Gomez , S., & Primack , J

    Klypin , A. A., Trujillo-Gomez , S., & Primack , J. 2011, title Dark Matter Halos in the Standard Cosmological Model: Results from the Bolshoi Simulation , , 740, 102, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/102

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/102 2011

  30. [42]

    N., et al

    Lamman , C., Eisenstein , D., Aguilar , J. N., et al. 2024, title Redshift-dependent RSD bias from Intrinsic Alignment with DESI Year 1 Spectra , , 528, 6559, 10.1093/mnras/stae317

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae317 2024

  31. [43]

    N., et al

    Lamman , C., Eisenstein , D., Aguilar , J. N., et al. 2023, title Intrinsic alignment as an RSD contaminant in the DESI survey , , 522, 117, 10.1093/mnras/stad950

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad950 2023

  32. [44]

    2017, title Large-scale assembly bias of dark matter halos , , 2017, 059, 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/059

    Lazeyras , T., Musso , M., & Schmidt , F. 2017, title Large-scale assembly bias of dark matter halos , , 2017, 059, 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/059

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/059 2017

  33. [45]

    V., Mao , Y.-Y., Becker , M

    Lehmann , B. V., Mao , Y.-Y., Becker , M. R., Skillman , S. W., & Wechsler , R. H. 2017, title The Concentration Dependence of the Galaxy-Halo Connection: Modeling Assembly Bias with Abundance Matching , , 834, 37, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/37

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/37 2017

  34. [47]

    2026, title Interpreting the strong clustering of ultra-diffuse galaxies by halo spin bias ,

    Ma , Q., Li , C., Chen , Y., & Mo , H. 2026, title Interpreting the strong clustering of ultra-diffuse galaxies by halo spin bias , . 2512.17742

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [48]

    R., & Wechsler , R

    Mao , Y.-Y., Zentner , A. R., & Wechsler , R. H. 2018, title Beyond assembly bias: exploring secondary halo biases for cluster-size haloes , , 474, 5143, 10.1093/mnras/stx3111

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3111 2018

  36. [49]

    2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields , , 480, 5113, 10.1093/mnras/sty2206

    Marinacci , F., Vogelsberger , M., Pakmor , R., et al. 2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields , , 480, 5113, 10.1093/mnras/sty2206

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2206 2018

  37. [50]

    2021, title Anisotropic satellite galaxy quenching modulated by black hole activity , , 594, 187, 10.1038/s41586-021-03545-9

    Mart \' n-Navarro , I., Pillepich , A., Nelson , D., et al. 2021, title Anisotropic satellite galaxy quenching modulated by black hole activity , , 594, 187, 10.1038/s41586-021-03545-9

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03545-9 2021

  38. [51]

    S., Zheng , Z., & Guo , H

    McCarthy , K. S., Zheng , Z., & Guo , H. 2019, title The effects of galaxy assembly bias on the inference of growth rate from redshift-space distortions , , 487, 2424, 10.1093/mnras/stz1461

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1461 2019

  39. [52]

    E., & Weinberg , D

    McEwen , J. E., & Weinberg , D. H. 2018, title The effects of assembly bias on the inference of matter clustering from galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering , , 477, 4348, 10.1093/mnras/sty882

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty882 2018

  40. [53]

    E., Zentner , A

    Mezini , L., Fielder , C. E., Zentner , A. R., et al. 2023, title The influence of subhaloes on host halo properties , , 526, 4157, 10.1093/mnras/stad2929

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2929 2023

  41. [54]

    J., & White , S

    Mo , H. J., & White , S. D. M. 1996, title An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes , , 282, 347, 10.1093/mnras/282.2.347

    doi:10.1093/mnras/282.2.347 1996

  42. [55]

    D., & Rodriguez , F

    Montero-Dorta , A. D., & Rodriguez , F. 2024, title The dependence of assembly bias on the cosmic web , , 531, 290, 10.1093/mnras/stae796

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae796 2024

  43. [56]

    2020, title The impact of filamentary accretion of subhaloes on the shape and orientation of haloes , , 495, 502, 10.1093/mnras/staa1180

    Morinaga , Y., & Ishiyama , T. 2020, title The impact of filamentary accretion of subhaloes on the shape and orientation of haloes , , 495, 502, 10.1093/mnras/staa1180

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1180 2020

  44. [57]

    2018, title How does the cosmic web impact assembly bias? , , 476, 4877, 10.1093/mnras/sty191

    Musso , M., Cadiou , C., Pichon , C., et al. 2018, title How does the cosmic web impact assembly bias? , , 476, 4877, 10.1093/mnras/sty191

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty191 2018

  45. [58]

    P., Pillepich , A., Springel , V., et al

    Naiman , J. P., Pillepich , A., Springel , V., et al. 2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magnesium and europium , , 477, 1206, 10.1093/mnras/sty618

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty618 2018

  46. [59]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1996, title The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos , , 462, 563, 10.1086/177173

    doi:10.1086/177173 1996

  47. [60]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1997, title A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , , 490, 493, 10.1086/304888

    doi:10.1086/304888 1997

  48. [61]

    2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality , , 475, 624, 10.1093/mnras/stx3040

    Nelson , D., Pillepich , A., Springel , V., et al. 2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality , , 475, 624, 10.1093/mnras/stx3040

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3040 2018

  49. [62]

    Obuljen , A., Dalal , N., & Percival , W. J. 2019, title Anisotropic halo assembly bias and redshift-space distortions , , 2019, 020, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/020

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/020 2019

  50. [63]

    J., & Dalal , N

    Obuljen , A., Percival , W. J., & Dalal , N. 2020, title Detection of anisotropic galaxy assembly bias in BOSS DR12 , , 2020, 058, 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/058

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/058 2020

  51. [64]

    Okumura , T., & Jing , Y. P. 2009, title The Gravitational Shear-Intrinsic Ellipticity Correlation Functions of Luminous Red Galaxies in Observation and in the CDM Model , , 694, L83, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L83

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/1/l83 2009

  52. [65]

    2018, title Strong orientation dependence of surface mass density profiles of dark haloes at large scales , , 477, 2141, 10.1093/mnras/sty762

    Osato , K., Nishimichi , T., Oguri , M., Takada , M., & Okumura , T. 2018, title Strong orientation dependence of surface mass density profiles of dark haloes at large scales , , 477, 2141, 10.1093/mnras/sty762

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty762 2018

  53. [66]

    Paranjape , A., Hahn , O., & Sheth , R. K. 2018, title Halo assembly bias and the tidal anisotropy of the local halo environment , , 476, 3631, 10.1093/mnras/sty496

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty496 2018

  54. [67]

    G., & Pahwa , I

    Paranjape , A., Kova c , K., Hartley , W. G., & Pahwa , I. 2015, title Correlating galaxy colour and halo concentration: a tunable halo model of galactic conformity , , 454, 3030, 10.1093/mnras/stv2137

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2137 2015

  55. [70]

    2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies , , 475, 648, 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    Pillepich , A., Nelson , D., Hernquist , L., et al. 2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies , , 475, 648, 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3112 2018

  56. [71]

    2016, title Planck 2015 results

    Planck Collaboration . 2016, title Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters , , 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 2016

  57. [73]

    Ramakrishnan , S., Paranjape , A., Hahn , O., & Sheth , R. K. 2019, title Cosmic web anisotropy is the primary indicator of halo assembly bias , , 489, 2977, 10.1093/mnras/stz2344

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2344 2019

  58. [74]

    Rodriguez , F., & Montero-Dorta , A. D. 2026, title Connecting clustering and the cosmic web: Observational constraints on secondary halo bias , , 707, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202558239

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558239 2026

  59. [75]

    2015, title The merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical models , , 449, 49, 10.1093/mnras/stv264

    Rodriguez-Gomez , V., Genel , S., Vogelsberger , M., et al. 2015, title The merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical models , , 449, 49, 10.1093/mnras/stv264

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv264 2015

  60. [76]

    N., Maller , A

    Salcedo , A. N., Maller , A. H., Berlind , A. A., et al. 2018, title Spatial clustering of dark matter haloes: secondary bias, neighbour bias, and the influence of massive neighbours on halo properties , , 475, 4411, 10.1093/mnras/sty109

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty109 2018

  61. [77]

    D., Abramo , L

    Sato-Polito , G., Montero-Dorta , A. D., Abramo , L. R., Prada , F., & Klypin , A. 2019, title The dependence of halo bias on age, concentration, and spin , , 487, 1570, 10.1093/mnras/stz1338

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1338 2019

  62. [78]

    D., Frenk , C

    Schneider , M. D., Frenk , C. S., & Cole , S. 2012, title The shapes and alignments of dark matter halos , , 2012, 030, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/05/030

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/05/030 2012

  63. [79]

    N., et al

    Shao , Z., Zu , Y., Salcedo , A. N., et al. 2025, title Direct Measurement of Galaxy Assembly Bias using DESI DR1 Data , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.20896. 2510.20896

    arXiv 2025

  64. [81]

    Shi , J., Wang , H., & Mo , H. J. 2015, title Flow Patterns around Dark Matter Halos: The Link between Halo Dynamical Properties and Large-scale Tidal Field , , 807, 37, 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/37

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/37 2015

  65. [82]

    J., Berlind , A

    Smith , W. J., Berlind , A. A., & Sinha , M. 2024, title Reversing Arrested Development: A New Method to Address Halo Assembly Bias , , 535, 1426, 10.1093/mnras/stae2339

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2339 2024

  66. [84]

    2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering , , 475, 676, 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    Springel , V., Pakmor , R., Pillepich , A., et al. 2018, title First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering , , 475, 676, 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3304 2018

  67. [86]

    P., Padmanabhan , N., & Leauthaud , A

    Sunayama , T., Hearin , A. P., Padmanabhan , N., & Leauthaud , A. 2016, title The scale-dependence of halo assembly bias , , 458, 1510, 10.1093/mnras/stw332

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw332 2016

  68. [87]

    D., Abramo , L

    Tucci , B., Montero-Dorta , A. D., Abramo , L. R., Sato-Polito , G., & Artale , M. C. 2021, title The physical origins of low-mass spin bias , , 500, 2777, 10.1093/mnras/staa3319

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3319 2021

  69. [88]

    S., Zentner , A

    Villarreal , A. S., Zentner , A. R., Mao , Y.-Y., et al. 2017, title The immitigable nature of assembly bias: the impact of halo definition on assembly bias , , 472, 1088, 10.1093/mnras/stx2045

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2045 2017

  70. [91]

    H., Zentner , A

    Wechsler , R. H., Zentner , A. R., Bullock , J. S., Kravtsov , A. V., & Allgood , B. 2006, title The Dependence of Halo Clustering on Halo Formation History, Concentration, and Occupation , , 652, 71, 10.1086/507120

    doi:10.1086/507120 2006

  71. [92]

    2021, title Dissecting and modelling galaxy assembly bias , , 502, 3242, 10.1093/mnras/stab100

    Xu , X., Zehavi , I., & Contreras , S. 2021, title Dissecting and modelling galaxy assembly bias , , 502, 3242, 10.1093/mnras/stab100

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab100 2021

  72. [94]

    2018, title The Impact of Assembly Bias on the Galaxy Content of Dark Matter Halos , , 853, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa54a

    Zehavi , I., Contreras , S., Padilla , N., et al. 2018, title The Impact of Assembly Bias on the Galaxy Content of Dark Matter Halos , , 853, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa54a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa54a 2018

  73. [95]

    R., Hearin , A

    Zentner , A. R., Hearin , A. P., & van den Bosch , F. C. 2014, title Galaxy assembly bias: a significant source of systematic error in the galaxy-halo relationship , , 443, 3044, 10.1093/mnras/stu1383

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1383 2014

  74. [96]

    2013, title Alignments of Galaxies within Cosmic Filaments from SDSS DR7 , , 779, 160, 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/160

    Zhang , Y., Yang , X., Wang , H., et al. 2013, title Alignments of Galaxies within Cosmic Filaments from SDSS DR7 , , 779, 160, 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/160

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/160 2013

  75. [97]

    2016, title Mapping stellar content to dark matter haloes - II

    Zu , Y., & Mandelbaum , R. 2016, title Mapping stellar content to dark matter haloes - II. Halo mass is the main driver of galaxy quenching , , 457, 4360, 10.1093/mnras/stw221

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw221 2016

  76. [98]

    , keywords =

    An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/282.2.347 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9512127 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [99]

    Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , archivePrefix =. 1502.01589 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [100]

    , keywords =

    The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/177173 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9508025 , adsurl =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [101]

    , year = 1997, month = dec, volume =

    A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering. , year = 1997, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1086/304888 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9611107 , adsurl =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  80. [105]

    , keywords =

    How does the cosmic web impact assembly bias?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty191 , archivePrefix =. 1709.00834 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.