Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

The interplay of crystal-field transitions and exchange spin dynamics in a ferrimagnet

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In GdYb-BIG garnet, Yb crystal-field excitations hybridize with Yb-Fe exchange modes and, together, they redshift on cooling—evidence that CEF levels renormalize exchange anisotropy and provide a tuning channel for THz spin dynamics.

desk verdict The THz-TDS data are the real contribution; the theory's λ(T) is a load-bearing fit parameter, so the claimed CEF-renormalization mechanism is not independently supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26026 v1 pith:QCIC2LZP submitted 2026-07-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Arpita Dutta , Pratyay Mukherjee , Ritwik Mondal , Shovon Pal This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords THztime-domainspectroscopyrare-earthirongarnetscrystal-electric-fieldexcitationsexchangespindynamicsmagnetizationcompensationanisotropicferrimagnetspin-orbitcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that crystal-electric-field (CEF) excitations of Yb ions in the ferrimagnetic garnet Gd3/2Yb1/2BiFe5O12 are not merely bystanders to the collective spin dynamics but actively couple to them. Temperature-dependent THz spectroscopy reveals two resonances, near 0.7 and 1 THz, that exchange spectral and temporal weight around the magnetization compensation temperature (TMC≈96 K) and both soften on cooling. This redshift is opposite to the hardening expected from stronger exchange at low temperature. The authors attribute it to a renormalization of the anisotropic Yb-Fe exchange interaction by the Yb CEF levels, mediated by spin-orbit coupling, and support this with three-sublattice Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert simulations whose anisotropic exchange matrix is tuned with temperature. If correct, the result makes rare-earth CEF levels a practical handle for engineering THz magnon frequencies across temperature.

What carries the argument

The central object is the anisotropic Yb-Fe exchange matrix λ (Eq. 3), a 3×3 tensor whose entries are fixed numbers scaled by a single temperature-dependent factor λ(T). The argument runs through the three-sublattice LLG equation (Fe, Gd, Yb) with this anisotropic exchange: as temperature drops, preferential occupation of the lowest CEF doublets makes the Yb-Fe exchange more isotropic, reducing the effective exchange energy and thereby lowering the resonance frequencies of the hybridized CEF-exchange modes. The off-diagonal elements of the matrix are what keep the modes coupled; dropping them destroys the hybridized spectrum.

What would settle it

Measure the Yb-Fe exchange anisotropy directly in Gd3/2Yb1/2BiFe5O12 as a function of temperature—for instance by inelastic neutron scattering on the same crystal batch or by high-field electron spin resonance—and compare the extracted λ(T) with Figure 4C. If the independently determined λ(T) does not follow the assumed curve, the claimed CEF-driven renormalization would not be confirmed. A complementary control: measure the THz response of a Yb-free garnet with the same Fe and Gd sublattices; if the Yb-Fe exchange mode still softens on cooling, the CEF mechanism is not the cause.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Yb-ion CEF excitation and the Yb-Fe exchange mode in GdYb-BIG hybridize, and that this hybridization renormalizes the Yb-Fe exchange anisotropy, driving both modes to lower frequencies as the material is cooled. The evidence is the temperature evolution of the THz spectra: a redistribution of spectral and temporal weight around TMC, a narrowing of the CEF linewidth while the exchange-mode linewidth stays constant, and a pronounced redshift of both modes. The mechanism is codified in an anisotropic Yb-Fe exchange matrix whose overall scale decreases with decreasing temperature, which the simulations use to reproduce the measured softening.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on assigning the temperature-dependent scale λ(T) in the anisotropic Yb-Fe exchange matrix to the curve shown in Figure 4C—and no independent measurement of the Yb-Fe exchange anisotropy in this material is presented, so the simulations' agreement with the measured redshift rests on an assumed temperature profile.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rare-earth garnets containing ions with nonzero orbital angular momentum (Yb, Ho, Er, Tm) should generically host CEF-exchange hybridized THz modes whose frequencies soften on cooling toward compensation, unlike S-state garnets (Gd, Y).
  • The magnetization compensation point acts as a spectral-weight switch: near TMC the THz response transfers from the CEF excitation to the exchange mode, a feature that could be used to gate or route magnon signals.
  • The redshift mechanism provides a temperature knob for continuously tuning THz resonance frequencies, relevant for tunable THz magnonic and spintronic devices.
  • The three-sublattice LLG model with anisotropic exchange shows that isotropic-only exchange models cannot reproduce the coupled-mode spectrum; off-diagonal exchange terms are essential.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct, independent measurement of the temperature dependence of the Yb-Fe exchange anisotropy (e.g., via neutron scattering or high-field resonance on the same composition) would test whether the λ(T) curve used in Figure 4C is real or a fitting parameter; the paper does not supply such a measurement.
  • If the CEF-mediated mechanism is correct, the same redshift should appear in other Yb-containing garnets and scale with Yb concentration; composition series experiments would separate the CEF effect from trivial exchange hardening.
  • The mechanism suggests an ultrafast control channel: pumping the CEF transition with a THz pulse could transiently change the CEF population and therefore the exchange anisotropy, offering a way to modulate magnon frequencies on picosecond timescales—an extension the paper does not state.
  • Since Gd (S-state) lacks orbital angular momentum, comparing Gd-only garnets should show no CEF-exchange hybridization and no anomalous redshift; observing a redshift there would refute the proposed uniqueness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports temperature-dependent THz-TDS on the ferrimagnetic garnet Gd3/2Yb1/2BiFe5O12 across its magnetization compensation temperature TMC≈96 K. The measurements reveal three resonances near 0.3, 0.7, and 1 THz, assigned to Gd-Fe exchange, a Yb single-ion CEF excitation, and a hybridized Yb-Fe exchange mode, respectively. The 0.7 and 1 THz modes show a temperature-dependent redistribution of spectral weight and an anomalous redshift upon cooling. The authors model the dynamics with a three-sublattice Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation containing an anisotropic Yb-Fe exchange matrix (Eq. 3), whose temperature-dependent scalar λ is said to follow the curve in Fig. 4C. The LLG simulations reproduce the measured mode frequencies and are used to support the central claim that the redshift arises from CEF-mediated renormalization of the Yb-Fe exchange anisotropy.

Significance. If the central mechanism were established, this would identify a new tuning channel for THz spin dynamics in rare-earth garnets: CEF excitations of L≠0 rare-earth ions would renormalize the anisotropic exchange coupling with the iron sublattice, leading to mode softening and spectral-weight transfer near compensation. The experimental observation of weight transfer and linewidth differences in a bismuth-substituted rare-earth garnet is itself of interest to the THz-spintronics community. However, the manuscript's theoretical confirmation is currently weakened by the reliance on a temperature-dependent parameter λ that is not independently determined; the key conceptual leap from CEF transitions to a classical LLG exchange matrix is also not explicitly derived.

major comments (3)
  1. [Modeling section, Eq. (3), Fig. 4C, and SI S4] The central claim that CEF excitations renormalize the Yb-Fe exchange and cause the redshift rests entirely on the temperature dependence of the scalar λ in Eq. (3). The text states that λ is a temperature-dependent variable 'whose values change in accordance with Figure 4C', and Fig. 4C is a product of the simulations (SI S4). No independent measurement, microscopic calculation, or fixed functional form for λ(T) is provided. If λ(T) is chosen to make the calculated modes track the measured frequencies, the agreement in Fig. 4B is not independent evidence for the CEF-renormalization mechanism. Please specify how λ(T) was obtained, how many effective parameters are fitted, and provide an out-of-sample test or a first-principles/molecular-field CEF calculation of λ(T) from the Yb 4f level populations and Fe exchange field.
  2. [Modeling section, Eq. (2)-(3), Fig. 4A] The model contains no explicit crystal-electric-field Hamiltonian. The 0.7 THz 'CEF excitation' is, in the LLG framework, a classical magnetic resonance arising from the anisotropic exchange matrix, not a quantum transition between CEF-split Kramers doublets. The proposed coupling mechanism between CEF excitations and exchange modes is therefore not demonstrated in the model; it is asserted. To make the central claim load-bearing, the authors should derive the λ-matrix elements from a CEF/exchange Hamiltonian for Yb3+ in the garnet site, or at least show explicitly how the 0.7 THz transition emerges from the CEF level scheme and how it hybridizes with the exchange mode in the equations of motion.
  3. [Figure 3B-D and related text] The frequency and linewidth data extracted from the Lorentzian fits are presented without error bars or a description of the fitting uncertainties. Since the anomalous redshift and the distinct linewidth behavior are the experimental pillars of the paper, the reader needs to know the statistical significance of the trends (e.g., standard errors from the fits, number of independent measurements). Additionally, the raw spectra are differential signals (20 mT minus 0 mT); the authors should discuss whether the subtraction procedure can bias the extracted frequencies or weights if the external field slightly shifts or modifies the modes.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: '4felectrons' should be '4f electrons'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption states 'low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) oscillatory components, denoted by the green- and yellow-shaded regions,' but the shading labels are not explicitly defined in the figure panel. Please add 'LF' and 'HF' labels directly in Fig. 2A or in the caption.
  3. [Eq. (2) and text after it] The notation m_i is used without specifying whether these are normalized vectors or full magnetization vectors; the demagnetization term and the meaning of the easy-axis vector n for a [111]-oriented film should be clarified. Also, the units of the exchange constants λ in Eq. (2) and the factors in Fig. 4C (10^-4 T^2 m^3/J) need to be stated consistently.
  4. [Eq. (3)] The matrix in Eq. (3) is presented as a set of dimensionless coefficients times λ, but its origin (e.g., from YbIG neutron-scattering or optical studies) is not described in the main text. Since the material is Gd-substituted and Bi-substituted, the transferability of this matrix to the present compound should be justified. Please also ensure the SI derivation of the effective-field components uses a consistent convention for the matrix indices.
  5. [References] Some reference names/formats appear inconsistent (e.g., Ref. 18 'V. P. Antonio' and the format of Refs. 47-49). Please check against the original publications.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

λ_Yb–Fe(T) in Eq. (3) is set from the same data it is used to explain; the LLG agreement in Fig. 4B is therefore a re-description of the input rather than independent support for CEF-renormalized exchange.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Modeling the observed exchange renormalization' (Eq. (3), Figs. 4B–4C) and SI S4]
    "λ is a temperature-dependent variable whose values change in accordance with Figure 4C (see S4 of Supporting Information for detailed simulations implementation)... The theoretical resonance frequencies associated with Gd-Fe exchange mode, Yb single-ion CEF excitations, and Yb-Fe exchange mode show good agreement with the experimentally observed temperature-dependent spectra (Figure 4B)."

    The theoretical resonances in Fig. 4B are obtained by solving LLG with the Yb-Fe exchange matrix Eq. (3) scaled by λ(T). λ(T) is not independently measured or computed from a microscopic CEF model; it is chosen to change in accordance with Fig. 4C, which already embodies the decreasing Yb-Fe exchange that produces the redshift. Thus the calculated mode softening is an output of the same temperature-dependent input it is said to predict. The agreement in Fig. 4B therefore does not provide independent confirmation that CEF excitations renormalize Yb-Fe exchange; it merely restates the assumed λ(T). The raw experimental redshift remains, but its proposed mechanism is not independently tested.

full rationale

The experimental THz-TDS part is self-contained: the time-domain transients, spectral weights, linewidths, and the redshift of the 0.7 and 1 THz modes are measured data. The circularity enters only in the modeling section. The central claim that CEF excitations renormalize the anisotropic Yb-Fe exchange and thereby cause the anomalous redshift rests on the temperature-dependent scale λ in Eq. (3). The paper states that λ changes in accordance with Fig. 4C, and Fig. 4C is a plot of the exchange-energy reduction used in the LLG simulations; no independent measurement or first-principles calculation of λ(T) is supplied in the main text or SI S4. Consequently, the agreement of the theoretical resonance frequencies with the experimental curves (Fig. 4B) is forced by construction: the model was given a λ(T) designed to produce a decreasing Yb-Fe exchange energy and then returns the expected redshift. This is a fitted input presented as a prediction, making the CEF-renormalization mechanism unfalsified rather than demonstrated. The self-citations to the authors' prior field-derivative-torque work (Refs. 39–41) are not the load-bearing issue here: they supply pulse parameters, damping, and FDT terms, but the decisive circular step is the λ(T) input. Overall score 6: the experiment is independent, but the paper's central theoretical confirmation reduces to re-describing the data.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model imports substantial prior-literature inputs (sublattice magnetizations, anisotropy constants, damping, pulse shape, exchange matrix coefficients) and introduces a temperature-dependent lambda_Yb-Fe that is adjusted to reproduce the experimental redshift. The observation itself does not depend on these choices, but the stated mechanism does.

free parameters (6)
  • lambda_Yb-Fe(T): temperature-dependent scale of the anisotropic exchange matrix = not tabulated; plotted in Fig. 4C, roughly 2-4 x 10^-4 T^2 m^3/J over 40-160 K
    The temperature dependence of lambda in Eq. (3) is chosen so that the LLG resonance frequencies follow the measured redshift; no independent constraint is provided.
  • gamma_Yb: gyromagnetic ratio of Yb sublattice = 1.17e11 s^-1 T^-1
    Reduced from the Fe/Gd value 1.76e11 to account for Yb orbital angular momentum; this choice affects the computed exchange-mode frequencies.
  • Gilbert damping constants alpha_i = 0.02 for Fe, Gd, Yb
    Taken from Ref. 39; affects linewidths and spectral shapes in the simulation.
  • THz pulse shape parameters = B0=20 mT, sigma=1 ps, f0=0.6 THz, chirp Gamma=2.6 ps
    Chosen to mimic the experimental THz pulse; influences the simulated spectral weights and dynamics.
  • Anisotropy constants K_Fe, K_Gd, K_Yb = not tabulated; inferred from Refs. 38 and 42
    Inputs from prior literature used in the free energy; not independently determined or tabulated here.
  • Lorentzian fit parameters (center, width, amplitude) for the three resonances = not tabulated; shown as curves in Fig. 3
    Fitted to each experimental spectrum; no uncertainties are reported, so the claimed frequency shifts lack error bars.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Three-sublattice LLG equation with free energy Eq. (2) captures the coupled THz dynamics of Fe, Gd, and Yb sublattices.
    The model assumes macrospin sublattice dynamics with exchange, anisotropy, Zeeman, and demagnetization terms; no derivation from a microscopic Hamiltonian is given.
  • domain assumption Yb-Fe exchange is described by the anisotropic matrix Eq. (3), whose coefficients are imported from Refs. 18, 47-49.
    The off-diagonal exchange matrix form and coefficients are taken from prior YbIG studies; their validity for GdYb-BIG is assumed without direct measurement.
  • ad hoc to paper The 0.7 THz and 1 THz modes are respectively Yb CEF and Yb-Fe exchange excitations.
    Modes are assigned by temperature behavior and literature analogies; no composition-specific CEF spectroscopy or polarization analysis is presented.
  • domain assumption Subtracting zero-field THz transients from 20 mT transients isolates the magnetic response.
    The background absorption is assumed to be field-independent and fully removed by the subtraction; field-dependent nonmagnetic contributions are neglected.
  • domain assumption Inclusion of the field-derivative torque (FDT) term from Refs. 39-41 is necessary to model the dynamics.
    The FDT is included based on prior observations in the same ferrimagnetic system; its prefactor depends on chosen unit-cell volumes and damping.
  • domain assumption Sublattice magnetization curves and temperature-dependent anisotropy constants from Refs. 38 and 42 are valid inputs.
    Molecular-field magnetization profiles from prior work are imported without remeasurement or uncertainty analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The interplay of crystal-field transitions and exchange spin dynamics in a ferrimagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QCIC2LZP

@misc{pith2026260726026,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The interplay of crystal-field transitions and exchange spin dynamics in a ferrimagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QCIC2LZP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26026}
}
abstract

Rare-earth iron garnets offer an ideal platform for exploring the interplay of low-energy excitations and the complex temperature-dependent magnetization dynamics. In these systems, exchange coupling between rare-earth and iron sublattices generates high-frequency collective spin excitations. In addition, the robust spin-orbit coupling of localized 4$f$ electrons triggers the crystal-electric-field (CEF) transitions at THz frequencies. Despite extensive research into the garnet spin dynamics, the interplay between CEF excitations and exchange modes has remained largely unmapped. Using temperature-dependent THz time-domain spectroscopy, we demonstrate a hybridization between the Yb-ion CEF excitation and the Yb-Fe exchange mode in Gd$_{3/2}$Yb$_{1/2}$BiFe$_{5}$O$_{12}$. This coupling is characterized by a significant redistribution of spectral and temporal weights as the material approaches its magnetization compensation temperature. Notably, the Yb-Fe exchange mode exhibits an anomalous redshift upon cooling -- a reversal of the conventional blue shift typically driven by increased exchange coupling. We trace this phenomenon to a modification of Yb-Fe exchange anisotropy, driven by the interplay of the Fe exchange field and Yb CEF excitations. These findings highlight the critical role of CEF-mediated exchange coupling in shaping low-energy spin dynamics, positioning rare-earth garnets as a cornerstone for future THz spintronic technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26026 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Crystal structure with sublattice exchange dynamics and Yb3+ single ion excitation. (A) Unit cell structure of Gd3/2Yb1/2BiFe5O12, where the iron (Fe) ions occupy the tetrahedral and octahedral sites, and the rare-earth ions (Gd and Yb) are located at the dodecahedral site. The rare￾earth magnetic moments couple to the net Fe magnetic moment via superexchange interactions mediated by O2− ions, thereby giving rise to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature dependent time-transients and temporal weight analysis. (A) Temperature-dependent time transients of GdYb-BIG, recorded in the presence of an external in￾plane magnetic field of 20 mT. The time transients reveal low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) oscillatory components, denoted by the green- and yellow-shaded regions, respectively. As the LF component decreases, the HF component begins to develop… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temperature evolution of the sublattice exchange modes and the crystal electric field excitation. (A) Temperature-dependent spectra of the time transients in Figure 2A. The spectra reveal the temperature evolution of the individual modes, namely, the Gd-Fe exchange dy￾namics (at 0.3 THz), the Yb-ion CEF excitation (at 0.7 THz), and the Yb-Fe exchange dynamics (at 1 THz). The red- and blue-shaded regions represent th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hybridization between Yb-Fe exchange dynamics and Yb-ion crystal electric field excitation. (A) Theoretical resonance spectra at three representative temperatures, identifying the three primary modes: Gd-Fe exchange, Yb-ion crystal electric field (CEF) excitation, and …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Kampfrath, A

    T. Kampfrath, A. Sell, G. Klatt, A. Pashkin, S. M\"ahrlein, T. Dekorsy, M. Wolf, M. Fiebig, A. Leitenstorfer and R. Huber, Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves, Nat. Photonics. 5 , 31-34 (2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    Baierl, J

    S. Baierl, J. H. Mentink, M. Hohenleutner, L. Braun, T. -M. Do, C. Lange, A. Sell, M. Fiebig, G. Woltersdorf, T. Kampfrath and R. Huber, Terahertz-driven nonlinear spin response of antiferromagnetic nickel oxide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 197201 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    T. G. H. Blank, K. A. Grishunin, E. A. Mashkovich, M. V. Logunov, A. K. Zvezdin, and A. V. Kimel, THz-scale field-induced spin dynamics in ferrimagnetic iron garnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 , 037203 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 , 015005 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 , 231-241 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    S. K. Kim, G. S. D. Beach, K. -J. Lee, T. Ono, Th . Rasing, and H. Yang, Ferrimagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater. 21 , 24-34 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Hoffmann, and S

    A. Hoffmann, and S. D. Bader, Opportunities at the frontiers of spintronics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 4 , 047001 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    I. Radu, K. Vahaplar, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, H. A. D \"u rr, T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, Th . Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins, Nature 472 , 205 (2011)

    2011

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    C. D. Stanciu, F. Hansteen, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A.Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, and Th . Rasing, All-optical magnetic recording with circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 , 047601 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, U. Atxitia, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, S. El Moussaoui, L. Le Guyader, E. Mengotti, L. J. Heyderman, F. Nolting, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, D. Afanasiev, B. A. Ivanov, A. M. Kalashnikova, K. Vahaplar, J. Mentink, A. Kirilyuk, Th...

    2012

  3. [11]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and Th . Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 , 2731 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, A. M. Balbashov, and Th .Rasing, Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses, Nature 435 , 655-657 (2005)

    2005

  5. [13]

    Nakamoto, B

    R. Nakamoto, B. Xu, C. Xu, H. Xu, and L. Bellaiche, Properties of rare-earth iron garnets from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 95 , 024434 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    N \'e el, R

    L. N \'e el, R. Pauthenet and B. Dreyfus, The rare earth garnets, Progress in Low temperature Physics, Elsevier 4 , 344-383 (1964)

    1964

  7. [15]

    B. A. Calhoun, J. Overmeyer, and W. V. Smith, Ferrimagnetic resonance in gadolinium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. 107 , 993-994 (1957)

    1957

  8. [16]

    H. Bai, H. -A. Zhou, W. Li, T. Xu, L. Wang, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, and W. Jiang, 4f electron-mediated compensated magnetism in rare-earth-substituted iron garnet films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23 , 044062 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    E. A. Mashkovich, K. A. Grishunin, A. K. Zvezdin, T. G. H. Blank, A. G. Zavyalov, P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, A. M. Kalashnikova, and A. V. Kimel, Terahertz-driven magnetization dynamics of bismuth-substituted yttrium iron-gallium garnet thin film near a compensation point, Phys....

    2022

  10. [18]

    V. P. Antonio, D. Prabhakaran, C. Balz, A. Krajewska, and A. T. Boothroyd, Model for coupled 4f - 3d magnetic spectra: A neutron scattering study of the Yb-Fe hybridization in Yb _ 3 Fe _ 5 O _ 12 , Phys. Rev. B 105 , 104422 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Haltz, J

    E. Haltz, J. Sampaio, S. Krishnia, L. Berges, R. Weil, A. Mougin, and A. Thiaville, Quantitative analysis of spin wave dynamics in ferrimagnets across compensation points, Phys. Rev. B 105 , 104414 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    C. D. Stanciu, A. V. Kimel, F. Hansteen, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing, Ultrafast spin dynamics across compensation points in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo : The role of angular momentum compensation, Phys. Rev. B 73 , 220402(R) (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    Gomonay, V

    O. Gomonay, V. Baltz, A. Brataas, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spin textures and dynamics, Nat. Phys. 14 , 213-216 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Donges, S

    A. Donges, S. Khmelevskyi, A. Deak, R. -M. Abrudan, D. Schmitz, I. Radu, F. Radu, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak, Magnetization compensation and spin reorientation transition in ferrimagnetic DyCo _ 5 : Multiscale modeling and element-specific measurements, Phys. Rev. B 96 , 024412 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Srinivasan, A

    K. Srinivasan, A. J. Grutter, T. E. Gage, P. Quarterman, C. J. Kinane, A. J. Caruana, G. Yu, J. Garcia-Barriocanal, S. Langridge, and B. J. H. Stadler, Interfacial magnetic characteristics of nearly compensated gadolinium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 , 044403 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    M. Deb, P. Molho, B. Barbara, and J. -Y. Bigot, Controlling laser-induced magnetization reversal dynamics in a rare-earth iron garnet across the magnetization compensation point, Phys. Rev. B 97 , 134419 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    K. J. Kim, S. K. Kim, Y. Hirata, S. -H. Oh, T. Tono, D. -H. Kim, T. Okuno, W. S. Ham, S. Kim, G. Go, Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Tsukamoto, T. Moriyama, K. -J. Lee, and T. Ono, Fast domain wall motion in the vicinity of the angular momentum compensation temperature of ferrimagnets, Nat...

    2017

  18. [26]

    H Mentink, J

    J. H Mentink, J. Hellsvik, D. V. Afanasiev, B. A. Ivanov, A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, O. Eriksson, M. I. Katsnelson, and Th. Rasing, Ultrafast spin dynamics in multisublattice magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 057202 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    R. A. Leenders, O. Y. Kovalenko, Y. Saito, N. R. Vovk, A. V. Kimel, and R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, THz-driven spin dynamics in orthoferrites with Kramers and non-Kramers rare-earth ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 , 246703 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Baierl, M

    S. Baierl, M. Hohenleutner, T. Kampfrath, A. K. Zvezdin, A. V. Kimel, R. Huber, and R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, Nonlinear spin control by terahertz-driven anisotropy fields, Nat. Photon. 10 , 715-718 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Parchenko, A

    S. Parchenko, A. Stupakiewicz, I. Yoshimine, T. Satoh, and A. Maziewski, Wide frequencies range of spin excitations in a rare-earth Bi-doped iron garnet with a giant Faraday rotation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 , 172402 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Satoh, Y

    T. Satoh, Y. Terui, R. Moriya, B. A. Ivanov, K. Ando, E. Saitoh, T. Shimura, and K. Kuroda, Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light, Nat. Photon. 6 , 662--666 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    A. J. Sievers III, and M. Tinkham, Far infrared spectra of rare-earth iron garnets, Phys. Rev. 129 , 1995 (1963)

    1995

  24. [32]

    L. D. Landau, and E. M. Lifshitz, Spin-orbit coupling, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, Phys. Zs. Sowjet. 8 , 153-169 (1935)

    1935

  25. [33]

    Nowak, Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials, Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    U. Nowak, Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials, Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    R. F. L. Evans, W. J. Fan, P. Chureemart, T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, and R. W. Chantrell, Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 26 , 103202 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Skubic, J

    B. Skubic, J. Hellsvik, L. Nordstr\" o m, and O. Eriksson, A method for atomistic spin dynamics simulations: implementation and examples, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 20 , 315203 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Mondal, A

    R. Mondal, A. Donges, U. Ritzmann, P. M. Oppeneer, and U. Nowak, Terahertz spin dynamics driven by a field-derivative torque, Phys. Rev. B 100 , 060409(R) (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Dutta, P

    A. Dutta, P. Mukherjee, S. P. Sarangi, S. Bhattacharjee, S. Pal, and R. Mondal, Role of material-dependent properties in THz field-derivative-torque-induced nonlinear magnetization dynamics, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 , 114404 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Mikuni, T

    K. Mikuni, T. Hiraoka, T. Kuramoto, Y. Fujii, A. Koreeda, S. Parchenko, A. Stupakiewicz, and T. Satoh, Magnetic Resonance Frequency of Two-Sublattice Ferrimagnet with Magnetic Compensation Temperature, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94 , 111001 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Dutta, C

    A. Dutta, C. Tzschaschel, D. Priyadarshi, K. Mikuni, Takuya Satoh, R. Mondal, and S. Pal, Evidence of relativistic field-derivative torque in nonlinear THz response of magnetization dynamics, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025 , 2414582 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Mukherjee, A

    P. Mukherjee, A. Dutta, S. Bhattacharjee, S. Pal, and R. Mondal, Field-derivative torque induced magnetization reversal in ferrimagnetic Gd _ 3 2 Yb _ 1 2 BiFe _ 5 O _ 12 , Phys. Rev. Mater. 9 , 104405 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Mukherjee, and R

    P. Mukherjee, and R. Mondal, Ultrafast switching of antiferromagnetic order by field-derivative torque, Phys. Rev. B 113 , 054407 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    Parchenko, Laser-induced spin dynamics in multisublattice ferrimagnetic dielectrics (2016)

    S. Parchenko, Laser-induced spin dynamics in multisublattice ferrimagnetic dielectrics (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    O. I. Gorbatov, G. Johansson, A. Jakobsson, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, I. Di Marco, J. Min\'ar, and C. Etz, Magnetic exchange interactions in yttrium iron garnet: A fully relativistic first-principles investigation, Phys. Rev. B 104 , 174401 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    L. -S. Xie, G. -X. Jin, L. He, G. E. W. Bauer, J. Barker, and K. Xia, First-principles study of exchange interactions of yttrium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. B 95 , 014423 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    L. -W. Wang, L. -S. Xie, P. -X. Xu, and K. Xia, First-principles study of magnon-phonon interactions in gadolinium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. B 101 , 165137 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Jensen, and A

    J. Jensen, and A. R. Mackintosh, Rare earth magnetism: Structures and excitations, Oxford University Press (1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    K. A. Wickersheim, Spectroscopic study of the ytterbium-iron exchange interaction in ytterbium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. 122 , 1376-1381 (1961)

    1961

  40. [48]

    K. A. Wickersheim, and R. L. White, Optical observation of exchange splitting in ytterbium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 , 123-125 (1960)

    1960

  41. [49]

    A. B. Harris, Spin-wave spectra of yttrium and gadolinium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. 132 , 2398-2409 (1963)

    1963

  42. [50]

    Iida, Magnetostriction constants of rare earth iron garnets, J

    S. Iida, Magnetostriction constants of rare earth iron garnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 22 , 1201-1209 (1967)

    1967

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.