Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 51 references

The paper proves that every complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton on a resolution of a Kähler cone has quadratic curvature decay and is therefore asymptotically conical; an existing uniqueness theorem then implies at most one suc

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:45 UTC pith:KZIBDEOH

load-bearing objection The paper's structural insight is real, but Prop 4.25—the final step to quadratic curvature decay—is not proven as written, so Theorem A should be treated as conditional pending a complete proof. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26054 v1 pith:KZIBDEOH submitted 2026-07-28 math.DG

Uniqueness of shrinking K\"ahler-Ricci solitons on resolutions of K\"ahler cones

Ronan J. Conlon , Alix Deruelle This is my paper
classification math.DG MSC 53C2553E20
keywords Kähler-Ricci solitonshrinking gradient solitonasymptotically conicalKähler coneresolution of singularitiescomplex Monge-Ampère equationquadratic curvature decayuniqueness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci solitons are distinguished Kähler metrics that move by self-similar scaling under the Ricci flow and model finite-time singularities. The paper asks how many such solitons a resolution of a Kähler cone — a non-compact complex manifold obtained by smoothing out the apex of a cone — can carry. It proves that every complete one necessarily has quadratic curvature decay, hence is asymptotically conical, with the soliton vector field becoming the radial flow of the cone at infinity. Since a known uniqueness theorem applies to asymptotically conical shrinkers, at most one complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton exists on any given resolution, up to pullback by biholomorphism. The significance is that uniqueness no longer needs a bounded-Ricci-curvature assumption, and a special case of a broader uniqueness conjecture for polarised Fano fibrations follows.

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem A, is that the asymptotic geometry of a complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton on a resolution of a Kähler cone is forced: it must be asymptotically conical, i.e., its Riemann curvature decays like the inverse square of the distance from a fixed point. The proof begins with the observation that the cone metric itself, together with its radial vector field r∂_r, is a shrinking Kähler-Ricci soliton up to errors of order r^-2. A torus-invariant background metric is then built from the cone, and the actual soliton is written as a perturbation of that background by i∂∂̄φ, where φ solves a complex Monge-Ampère equation whose coefficients decay at rate r^-2. The

What carries the argument

The heart of the argument is the complex Monge-Ampère equation (ω + i∂∂̄φ)^n = e^{F + (X·φ)/2 − φ}ω^n, where ω is a torus-invariant background Kähler metric asymptotic to the cone, X is the soliton vector field, and F is a known function with r^-2 decay. It encodes that ω + i∂∂̄φ is again a shrinking Kähler-Ricci soliton with the same vector field. The machinery consists of a posteriori estimates for this equation: an L² maximum principle with a drift term from X, a Schwarz lemma adapted to the drift Laplacian, and weighted barrier arguments that first control φ and X·φ linearly in the potential, then show the metrics are bi-Lipschitz, then control C³ norms, and finally force the curvature o

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the zero set of the soliton vector field is compact — a fact taken from a companion paper — since without it the conical background metric and the whole estimate chain cannot be set up.

What would settle it

Exhibit a complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton on a resolution of a Kähler cone for which the Riemann curvature does not decay like d(p, x)^(-2), for example curvature bounded below away from zero along a sequence going to infinity; Theorem A states that none exists.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton on a resolution of a Kähler cone is asymptotically conical; non-conical shrinkers cannot occur on such manifolds.
  • On a fixed resolution, all such solitons are the same up to pullback by biholomorphism; in particular, on C^n the only one is the flat Gaussian soliton, and on the total space of O(-k) → CP^(n-1) (0 < k < n) the only one is the standard U(n)-invariant example.
  • Earlier classification theorems for shrinking Kähler-Ricci solitons on C^n and on that line bundle no longer require a bounded-Ricci-curvature assumption.
  • Each such soliton admits a maximal torus of holomorphic isometries with the soliton vector field in its Lie algebra, and the soliton vector field uniquely minimizes the weighted volume functional; equivalently, the resolution is a K-polystable polarised Fano fibration.
  • The uniqueness conjecture for shrinkers on polarised Fano fibrations is confirmed in the special case where the fibration is a resolution of a Kähler cone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The asymptotic cone of a shrinker on a given resolution is not specified by Theorem A; if two solitons on the same resolution were ever found with different cones, uniqueness would force the cone to be a biholomorphism invariant of the resolution rather than a choice made when constructing the soliton.
  • The estimate chain uses compactness of the zero set of X. A natural test is whether the same Monge-Ampère strategy works for steady or expanding solitons on cone resolutions, where the zero set may not be compact.
  • The a posteriori bounds suggest a quantitative stability statement: any two shrinkers on the same resolution should be conjugate by a biholomorphism that approaches the identity at infinity with a definite rate, a property that could be checked in explicit toric examples.
  • If a resolution admits a continuous family of cone structures, uniqueness implies that soliton existence itself is a free-boundary problem: the soliton selects its own asymptotic cone. This is consistent with the paper's observation that the tangent cone cannot be determined in advance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proves that every complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton on a resolution of a Kähler cone has quadratic curvature decay, hence is asymptotically conical (Theorem A). Relying on a theorem of Esparza, it then concludes that, up to pullback by biholomorphism, there is at most one such soliton on a given resolution (Corollary B), confirming a special case of a Song–Zhang conjecture. The proof proceeds by constructing a canonical asymptotically conical background metric (Prop. 3.4), reducing the soliton equation to the complex Monge–Ampère equation (3.6), and then deriving a long sequence of a priori estimates (§4) culminating in curvature decay. The structural logic is clear, and the reduction to (3.6) is carried out in detail, but the final curvature-decay step is sketchy and contains a false identity, and the application of Esparza's theorem is not documented.

Significance. If Theorem A is correct, it is a substantial result: it removes the bounded-curvature assumption from earlier classification work and establishes conical asymptotics for all shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci solitons on resolutions of Kähler cones, thereby yielding the advertised uniqueness corollary. The strategy — deriving the asymptotic geometry from a Monge–Ampère equation with decaying data — is attractive and the background-metric construction is genuinely useful. However, the proof as written is not yet complete: Proposition 4.25, the last step proving quadratic curvature decay, contains an incorrect identity and cites a missing reference. The corollary also depends on an unstated hypothesis of an external uniqueness theorem. These are load-bearing issues for the central claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Prop. 4.25 (eqs. (4.23)–(4.24))] The final step proving quadratic curvature decay is not rigorous as written. First, the displayed identity |∇^{gφ}Ψ|²_{gφ} = |Rm(gφ)−Rm(g)|²_{gφ} is false in general: Ψ, defined in (4.16), is the tensor of Christoffel-symbol differences, and the curvature difference is controlled only up to lower-order terms, schematically |Rm(gφ)−Rm(g)| ≤ C(|∇^{gφ}Ψ| + |Ψ|²). Second, the "standard" differential inequality for |Rm(gφ)| is cited as "[?]" with no reference. Since Prop. 4.25 is precisely the step that converts the estimates of §4 into Theorem A, this gap is load-bearing. If the intended argument requires absorbing |Ψ|⁴ (equivalently S²) using the boundedness of S from Prop. 4.22, then the inequalities (4.23)–(4.24) must be re-derived with the correct error terms. The proof also ends with "one can deduce" and "one can show" in the key decay argument; these steps need to be written out.
  2. [§1.2, Cor. B] The deduction of Corollary B from [Esp25b, Theorem 1.1] is asserted without stating the hypotheses of Esparza's theorem. This matters because Theorem A proves that each soliton is asymptotically conical but, as the paper itself notes, does not determine the asymptotic cone. If Esparza's uniqueness theorem applies only to shrinkers sharing the same tangent cone, then two solitons on the same resolution M with different asymptotic cones would not be covered by the quoted result. Please state the precise theorem and explain how it applies to arbitrary pairs of shrinkers on a fixed resolution π:M→C₀. This is essential because Corollary B is the paper's main application.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2, eq. (3.12)] Equation (3.12) does not follow from (3.11). The correct primitive obtained from the preceding display is φ + log((ω+i∂∂̄φ)ⁿ/ωⁿ) − ½X·φ − F = c, not −φ + log((ω+i∂∂̄φ)ⁿ/ωⁿ) + ½X·φ − F = c. Solving the printed equation would yield the wrong exponent in (3.6), although the correct (3.6) does follow from the equation just before (3.12). Please correct the sign.
  2. [§3.1, Claim 3.3] The solution of dh/dt = λh is h(γ(t)) = h(x)e^{λt}, not h(γ(t)) = h(x)e^{-λt}. As printed, the convergence limits in the next display are reversed. The intended conclusion λ>0 survives after correcting this sign.
  3. [§4.4, Lemma 4.24] The sentence "An integration by parts then shows that the left-hand side of (4.4) is bounded from above" appears to refer to (4.22), not (4.4). The scalar-curvature equation (4.4) is unrelated to the integral being estimated.
  4. [§4.4, Prop. 4.22] The statement of Proposition 4.22 only asserts the boundedness of |∇^g(ωφ−ω)|_g, but the proof actually establishes quadratic decay of S = |∇^g gφ|²_{gφ} at infinity. Since Proposition 4.25 uses this stronger decay, please include it in the statement.
  5. [References / Prop. 4.25] Proposition 4.25 contains a citation placeholder "[?]" for the curvature evolution inequality; this needs to be a real reference or a proof. Also, [CE25a] and [CE25b] appear to have identical titles and arXiv numbers; please check whether these are distinct works.
  6. [§2.4, Prop. 2.9] The proof of Proposition 2.9 cites [SZ24, Proposition 3.15] for compactness of the zero set of X, while Lemma 2.8 and Lemma 4.9 cite [SZ24, Proposition 3.5]. Please reconcile the numbering.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; Theorem A is derived from the soliton equation via a posteriori estimates, and the flagged Prop 4.25 issue is a proof gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central claim Theorem A is not equivalent to any input. The proof starts from an arbitrary complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton and derives the complex Monge-Ampère equation (3.6) from the soliton equation; no quantity in (3.6) is fitted to the desired quadratic curvature decay, which is obtained a posteriori in §4. The load-bearing external inputs are [SZ24, Proposition 3.5] (compactness of the zero set of X) and [MW17] (quadratic curvature decay implies conical asymptotics), both outside the present author set. Self-citations ([CD20a, CDS24, BCD25]) supply background facts such as the AC-shrinker dictionary, the pluriharmonic-constant lemma, and the Monge-Ampère setup; Proposition 3.4 cites [BCD25, Proposition 3.2] but then provides a proof. Corollary B is a direct application of Esparza's external uniqueness theorem, not an imported self-citation. The skeptical concern about Prop 4.25 is a genuine correctness/rigor issue: the proof is labelled 'sketchy', invokes a 'standard' inequality with citation placeholder '[?]', and asserts the equality |∇^{g_φ}Ψ|²_{g_φ} = |Rm(g_φ)-Rm(g)|²_{g_φ}, which is not generally an identity because the curvature difference also involves lower-order Ψ terms. This affects validity, not circularity: it does not show that the theorem was assumed as an input or that a parameter was fitted to the output. The cross-reference 'left-hand side of (4.4)' in Lemma 4.24 (apparently (4.22)) is likewise a non-circular typographical slip. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

Proof-based mathematics with no empirical fits and no postulated entities. The auxiliary objects — background metric ω, potential functions F, f, φ, cutoffs ζ_R, Ψ_α, barriers Φ — are constructed within the proof and satisfy stated equations; they are standard devices, not entities with independent falsifiable content. The paper's real input cost is its dependence on prior theorems ([SZ24], [Esp25b], [CDS24], [CD20b], [MW17], [CZ10]), listed under axioms.

free parameters (1)
  • Auxiliary estimate constants (C, C′, α, β, ε, R in Props 4.3–4.25)
    Constants chosen by hand inside the proofs (e.g., α ≥ 2C in Claim 4.17, C′ large in Claim 4.16, ε in Prop 4.11). They are universal — depending only on n and the background cone geometry — and none encodes data or the target result, so this is standard analysis rather than parameter fitting.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The zero set of the soliton vector field X of a complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton is compact ([SZ24, Proposition 3.5]).
    The pivot of the strategy: it replaces the bounded-Ricci assumption of [CDS24] and is used in Lemma 2.8, Proposition 2.9, and Proposition 3.1(iv)-(v) to establish that the soliton vector field is conical and that a T-equivariant background cone metric exists. If false, the Monge-Ampère setup of §3 collapses.
  • domain assumption Esparza's uniqueness theorem [Esp25b, Theorem 1.1]: asymptotically conical shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci solitons are unique up to pullback by biholomorphism (precise hypotheses not stated in this paper).
    Corollary B — the headline uniqueness result — is this theorem applied after Theorem A. Because Theorem A does not determine the tangent cone, whether Esparza's uniqueness compares shrinkers with different cones matters; the paper does not reproduce the theorem's hypotheses.
  • domain assumption [CDS24, Theorem A]: a complete shrinking gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton with quadratic curvature decay is asymptotically conical with dΦ(r∂r) = X, and conversely.
    Used in §2.3 and in the equivalence statement of Theorem A to convert the proved quadratic curvature decay into conical asymptotics; a theorem by the same authors with S. Sun.
  • domain assumption [MW17]: quadratic curvature decay for complete shrinking Ricci solitons implies conical structure.
    Quoted in §1.2 as the bridge from Theorem A's curvature decay to asymptotically conical geometry; external theorem of Munteanu-Wang.
  • domain assumption Lemma 2.6 ([CD20b, Lemma 2.4]): a pluriharmonic function on the punctured end of a Kähler cone that is invariant under the Reeb flow is constant.
    Used to absorb the integration constants in Proposition 3.4(i) and (iii) (e.g., F − G = c₀ at infinity, and the constant c in the Monge-Ampère equation). Imported from the authors' prior work.
  • standard math Lemma 4.9 L² maximum principle with drift: if Δ_{gφ,X}U ≥ V·U with V > 0 and U ∈ L²(e^{−G(f_φ)} dμ), then U is bounded above.
    Proved in the paper; the engine behind Propositions 4.11, 4.13, 4.20, 4.22, and 4.25. Its validity is standard, but each application requires verifying U ∈ L², which the paper does via Proposition 4.7.
  • standard math Standard shrinking-soliton identities and growth estimates: R + Δf = m (Lemma 4.1, from [CLN06]); normalization Δ_{g,X}f + 2f = 0 (4.5); properness and polynomial volume growth of f ([CZ10]); completeness of X ([Zha09]).
    Background for all of §4; used without proof from the cited literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29971 in / 25034 out tokens · 221258 ms · 2026-08-01T00:45:32.736096+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that any complete shrinking gradient K\"ahler-Ricci soliton on a resolution of a K\"ahler cone is necessarily asymptotically conical. From a result of Esparza, it then follows that up to pullback by biholomorphism, there exists at most one complete shrinking gradient K\"ahler-Ricci soliton on such a resolution. This confirms a special case of the uniqueness part of a conjecture of Song-Zhang. Some other consequences are also discussed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Apostolov and C

    V. Apostolov and C. Cifarelli, Hamiltonian 2-forms and new explicit C alabi- Y au metrics and gradient steady K \"ahler- R icci solitons on C ^n , J. Differential Geom. 130 (2025), no. 3, 517--570. 4918214

    2025

  2. [2]

    I. Babu, R. Conlon, and A. Deruelle, An A ubin continuity path for asymptotically conical toric shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons: openness and a solution for t=0 , arXiv:2512.18137 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Boucksom, P

    S. Boucksom, P. Eyssidieux, and V. Guedj, An introduction to the K \"ahler- R icci flow , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2086, Springer, Cham, 2013, pp. viii+333. 3202578

    2086

  4. [4]

    Boyer and K

    C. Boyer and K. Galicki, Sasakian geometry, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008. 2382957

    2008

  5. [5]

    Biquard and H

    O. Biquard and H. Macbeth, Steady K \"ahler- R icci solitons on crepant resolutions of finite quotients of C^n , J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 109 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. e12833, 27. 4680223

    2024

  6. [6]

    Barth and R

    W. Barth and R. Narasimhan (eds.), Several complex variables. VI , Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 69, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, Complex manifolds, A translation of Sovremennye problemy matematiki. Fundamentalnye napravleniya, Tom 69, Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow. 1095088 (91i:32001)

    1990

  7. [7]

    R. L. Bryant, Gradient K \"ahler R icci solitons , Ast\'erisque (2008), no. 321, 51--97, G \'e om \'e trie diff \'e rentielle, physique math \'e matique, math \'e matiques et soci \'e t \'e . I. 2521644

    2008

  8. [8]

    Cao, Existence of gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons , Elliptic and parabolic methods in geometry ( M inneapolis, MN , 1994), A K Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1996, pp

    H.-D. Cao, Existence of gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons , Elliptic and parabolic methods in geometry ( M inneapolis, MN , 1994), A K Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1996, pp. 1--16. 1417944

    1994

  9. [9]

    a hler- R icci solitons coming out of K \

    R. J. Conlon and A. Deruelle, Expanding K \" a hler- R icci solitons coming out of K \" a hler cones , J. Differential Geom. 115 (2020), no. 2, 303--365. 4100705

    2020

  10. [10]

    , Steady gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons on crepant resolutions of C alabi- Y au cones , to appear in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., arXiv:2006.03100 (2020)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    Conlon, A

    R. Conlon, A. Deruelle, and S. Sun, Classification results for expanding and shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons , Geom. Topol. 28 (2024), no. 1, 267--351. 4711837

    2024

  12. [13]

    , K-polystability of A symptotically C onical K \"ahler- R icci S hrinkers , arXiv:2512.03323 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    R. J. Conlon and H.-J. Hein, Asymptotically conical C alabi- Y au manifolds, I , Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 15, 2855--2902. 3161306

    2013

  14. [15]

    Cifarelli, Uniqueness of shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons on non-compact toric manifolds , to appear in J

    C. Cifarelli, Uniqueness of shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons on non-compact toric manifolds , to appear in J. Lond. Math. Soc., arXiv:2010.00166v3 (2020)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [16]

    , Explicit complete R icci-flat metrics and K \"ahler- R icci solitons on direct sum bundles , arXiv:2410.23645 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [17]

    77, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006

    Bennett Chow, Peng Lu, and Lei Ni, Hamilton's R icci flow , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 77, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006. 2274812 (2008a:53068)

    2006

  17. [18]

    Conlon and F

    R. Conlon and F. Rochon, New examples of complete C alabi- Y au metrics on C^n for n 3 , Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) 54 (2021), no. 2, 259--303. 4258163

    2021

  18. [19]

    Collins and G

    T. Collins and G. Sz\' e kelyhidi, K-semistability for irregular S asakian manifolds , J. Differential Geom. 109 (2018), no. 1, 81--109. 3798716

    2018

  19. [20]

    Cao and D

    H.-D. Cao and D. Zhou, On complete gradient shrinking R icci solitons , J. Differential Geom. 85 (2010), no. 2, 175--185. 2732975

    2010

  20. [21]

    Dancer and M

    A. Dancer and M. Wang, On R icci solitons of cohomogeneity one , Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 39 (2011), no. 3, 259--292. 2769300 (2012a:53124)

    2011

  21. [22]

    Enders, R

    J. Enders, R. M\"uller, and P. Topping, On type- I singularities in R icci flow , Comm. Anal. Geom. 19 (2011), no. 5, 905--922. 2886712

    2011

  22. [23]

    Esparza, Shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons are simply-connected , arXiv:2503.05838 (2025)

    C. Esparza, Shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons are simply-connected , arXiv:2503.05838 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [24]

    , Uniqueness of asymptotically conical shrinking gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons , arXiv:2502.13521 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [25]

    Feldman, T

    M. Feldman, T. Ilmanen, and D. Knopf, Rotationally symmetric shrinking and expanding gradient K \"ahler- R icci solitons , J. Differential Geom. 65 (2003), no. 2, 169--209. 2058261

    2003

  25. [26]

    Futaki, K\"ahler- E instein metrics and integral invariants , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    A. Futaki, K\"ahler- E instein metrics and integral invariants , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1314, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988. 947341

    1988

  26. [27]

    , Irregular E guchi- H anson type metrics and their soliton analogues , Pure Appl. Math. Q. 17 (2021), no. 1, 27--53. 4257580

    2021

  27. [28]

    Futaki and M.-T

    A. Futaki and M.-T. Wang, Constructing K \"ahler- R icci solitons from S asaki- E instein manifolds , Asian J. Math. 15 (2011), no. 1, 33--52. 2786464

    2011

  28. [29]

    Grauert, \" U ber M odifikationen und exzeptionelle analytische M engen , Math

    H. Grauert, \" U ber M odifikationen und exzeptionelle analytische M engen , Math. Ann. 146 (1962), 331--368. 0137127 (25 \#583)

    1962

  29. [30]

    He and S

    W. He and S. Sun, Frankel conjecture and S asaki geometry , Adv. Math. 291 (2016), 912--960. 3459033

    2016

  30. [31]

    Jeffres, R

    T. Jeffres, R. Mazzeo, and Y. Rubinstein, K\"ahler- E instein metrics with edge singularities , Ann. of Math. (2) 183 (2016), no. 1, 95--176, With appendices by Chi Li and Rubinstein. 3432582

    2016

  31. [32]

    Koll \'a r, Lectures on resolution of singularities, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol

    J. Koll \'a r, Lectures on resolution of singularities, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 166, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007. 2289519

    2007

  32. [33]

    Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry

    R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry. I , Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 48, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004, Classical setting: line bundles and linear series. 2095471

    2004

  33. [34]

    Li, On rotationally symmetric K \"ahler- R icci solitons , arXiv:1004.4049 (2010)

    C. Li, On rotationally symmetric K \"ahler- R icci solitons , arXiv:1004.4049 (2010)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [35]

    Li, A new complete C alabi- Y au metric on C^3 , Invent

    Y. Li, A new complete C alabi- Y au metric on C^3 , Invent. Math. 217 (2019), no. 1, 1--34. 3958789

    2019

  35. [36]

    , S YZ geometry for C alabi- Y au 3-folds: T aub- NUT and O oguri- V afa type metrics , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 292 (2023), no. 1453, v+126. 4679706

    2023

  36. [37]

    Ma, New C alabi- Y au M etrics of T aub- N U T T ype on C ^ N+ 1 , arXiv:2601.06756 (2026)

    T. Ma, New C alabi- Y au M etrics of T aub- N U T T ype on C ^ N+ 1 , arXiv:2601.06756 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  37. [38]

    Dario Martelli, James Sparks, and Shing-Tung Yau, The geometric dual of a -maximisation for toric S asaki- E instein manifolds , Comm. Math. Phys. 268 (2006), no. 1, 39--65. 2249795

    2006

  38. [39]

    Munteanu and J

    O. Munteanu and J. Wang, Topology of K \"ahler R icci solitons , J. Differential Geom. 100 (2015), no. 1, 109--128. 3326575

    2015

  39. [40]

    , Conical structure for shrinking R icci solitons , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19 (2017), no. 11, 3377--3390. 3713043

    2017

  40. [41]

    Naber, Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature, J

    A. Naber, Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature, J. Reine Angew. Math. 645 (2010), 125--153. 2673425

    2010

  41. [42]

    Phong, N

    D. Phong, N. Sesum, and J. Sturm, Multiplier ideal sheaves and the K \"ahler- R icci flow , Comm. Anal. Geom. 15 (2007), no. 3, 613--632. 2379807

    2007

  42. [43]

    Rossi, Vector fields on analytic spaces, Ann

    H. Rossi, Vector fields on analytic spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 78 (1963), 455--467. 0162973 (29 \#277)

    1963

  43. [44]

    a fer, Asymptotically cylindrical steady K \

    J. Sch \"a fer, Asymptotically cylindrical steady K \"a hler- R icci solitons , arXiv:2103.12629 (2021)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [45]

    afer, Existence and uniqueness of S^1 -invariant K \

    J. Sch\"afer, Existence and uniqueness of S^1 -invariant K \"ahler- R icci solitons , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 32 (2023), no. 1, 15--53. 4574737

    2023

  45. [46]

    Sun and J

    S. Sun and J. Zhang, K \"ahler- R icci shrinkers and F ano fibrations , arXiv:2410.09661 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [47]

    Sz \'e kelyhidi, Uniqueness of some C alabi- Y au metrics on C ^n , Geom

    G. Sz \'e kelyhidi, Uniqueness of some C alabi- Y au metrics on C ^n , Geom. Funct. Anal. 30 (2020), no. 4, 1152--1182. 4153912

    2020

  47. [48]

    van Coevering, Examples of asymptotically conical R icci-flat K \"ahler manifolds , Math

    C. van Coevering, Examples of asymptotically conical R icci-flat K \"ahler manifolds , Math. Z. 267 (2011), 465--496

    2011

  48. [49]

    Wang and Y

    B. Wang and Y. Li, On K \"a hler R icci shrinker surfaces , arXiv:2301.09784, to appear in Acta Math. (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Wang and X

    X.-J. Wang and X. Zhu, K\"ahler- R icci solitons on toric manifolds with positive first C hern class , Adv. Math. 188 (2004), no. 1, 87--103. 2084775 (2005d:53074)

    2004

  50. [51]

    Yau, On the R icci curvature of a compact K \"ahler manifold and the complex M onge- A mp\`ere equation

    S.-T. Yau, On the R icci curvature of a compact K \"ahler manifold and the complex M onge- A mp\`ere equation. I , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31 (1978), no. 3, 339--411. 480350

    1978

  51. [52]

    Zhang, On the completeness of gradient R icci solitons , Proc

    Z.-H. Zhang, On the completeness of gradient R icci solitons , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), no. 8, 2755--2759. 2497489

    2009