Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

On phase-lock area parquet in a special slow-fast limit of model of Josephson junction

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a special slow-fast limit, the phase-lock areas of the Josephson junction model converge to a parquet of unit squares and strips.

desk verdict Solid new theorem on Josephson phase-lock parquet, with one load-bearing cited flowbox lemma that should be proved or pinned down before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26158 v1 pith:4MJ5SEOZ submitted 2026-07-28 math.DS

Alexey Glutsyuk This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 34E1537C5534C15
keywords phase-lockareasArnoldtonguesJosephsonjunctionRSJmodelslow-fastsystemsrotationnumberRiccatiequationparquet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes the first explicit asymptotic portrait of the phase-lock areas (Arnold tongues) of the overdamped Josephson junction model in the slow-fast limit where the frequency ω tends to zero and the bias parameters approach (B,A)=(0,1) at speed proportional to ω. After rescaling B=ℓω and A=1+uω, the r-th phase-lock area is proved to converge, in the Hausdorff sense, to a piecewise-linear parquet: an infinite chain of unit squares with integer vertices whose diagonals lie on the line ℓ=r, together with a downward strip (for r=0, a sector). Every vertex of this limit parquet is shown to be the limit of constrictions, the crossing points of the two boundary curves of the phase-lock area. The same result is extended to a general class of slow-fast systems on the two-torus with two Morse critical points, where the two parameters are replaced by the two constants of an associated Riccati equation. If correct, this gives a complete geometric description of the asymptotics of Arnold tongues in this regime, resolving a long-standing open question.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the proof. (1) Near each critical point of the slow curve {cosθ+cosτ=0}, a local rescaling turns the system into a Riccati equation dx/dy = x² − y² + c with c=u±ℓ. Its stable solution x_−(y) has exactly m simple real poles when c∈(2m−1,2m+1), and a heteroclinic connection exactly when c=2m+1 (mirroring the harmonic-oscillator eigenvalues). The poles split the graph of x_− into arcs that correspond one-to-one to the squares of the limit parquet. (2) The classical stable-flowbox lemma (cited, not proved here) says a segment transverse to the slow curve is carried along it in an O(ω)-close ribbon of exponentially small width; this converts the local Riccati dynamics into a

What would settle it

Take ω=0.05 and parameters (ℓ,u)=(1,2), which lies inside the r=1 square of the predicted parquet for the RSJ model; numerically integrate the equation dθ/dτ=(1/ω)(cosθ+ω+(1+2ω)cosτ) and compute the rotation number over many periods — the theorem says it equals 1. If it does not, or if the constriction of the phase-lock boundary near (1,1) does not approach that vertex as ω decreases, the convergence claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim: in the scaling B=ℓω, A=1+uω, as ω→0, the phase-lock area L_r(ω) — the parameter set where the rotation number equals r — converges to the closure of L⁰_r = ⋃_{k,k+r≥0} {u+ℓ ∈ (2(k+r)−1, 2(k+r)+1), u−ℓ ∈ (2k−1, 2k+1)}, with the interval at index 0 equal to (−∞,1). In the (ℓ,u) plane this is a chain of unit squares with integer vertices on the line ℓ=r, plus a downward strip (a sector when r=0). The vertices on ℓ=r are exactly the limits of constrictions of L_r(ω); and the same parquet, with u±ℓ replaced by general constants c_±, is proved for a class of slow-fast systems on the two-torus with two Morse critical points.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on a classical slow-fast lemma, cited without proof, asserting that a segment transverse to the slow curve is carried along it in an exponentially thin ribbon at distance O(ω); if that uniform thinness fails, the filling of the limit squares collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The asymptotic shape of every Arnold tongue in the (ℓ,u) plane is universal: for rotation number r it is always the same chain of unit squares plus a strip/sector, independent of the particular trigonometric forcing once the two parameters u±ℓ are fixed.
  • The constrictions of the phase-lock areas accumulate exactly at the integer vertices of the limit parquet on ℓ=r, predicting where boundary crossings converge.
  • The boundaries between neighboring phase-lock areas collapse to the piecewise-linear lines u±ℓ = 2k+1, so in the limit adjacent tongues meet along straight segments.
  • The general theorem extends the same conclusion to any slow-fast system on the two-torus with two Morse critical points satisfying the stated conditions, with the parquet coordinatized by the two Riccati constants c_±.
  • In the limit, the rotation number is the difference m−k of the half-interval indices occupied by the two parameters c_+ and c_−.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the convergence is as strong as the Hausdorff statement, the Arnold-tongue structure in this scaling limit is purely combinatorial: the integer lattice points on ℓ=r enumerate the constriction limits, suggesting a topological index (difference of crossing counts) could label tongues in more general junctions.
  • The appearance of the harmonic-oscillator eigenvalues 2m+1 in the heteroclinic condition points to a spectral mechanism behind the parquet; similar square tilings may arise in other slow-fast limits reducible to an oscillator equation, such as certain Josephson arrays or modulated planar rotors.
  • A natural extension is to test numerically whether the parquet persists for other scaling rates, e.g., (B,A)−(0,1) of order ω^p with p≠1; the theorem does not address those rates and the limit might differ.
  • The paper treats the special point (0,1); applying the same rescaling near other points of the (B,A) plane where the slow curve has different topology could yield different tilings, and the general theorem may be the first step toward a classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the overdamped Josephson junction (RSJ) model in the slow-fast limit ω→0 while (B,A)=(ℓω,1+uω). In the rescaled parameters (ℓ,u), it claims that the phase-lock area L_r(ω) converges to an explicit piecewise-linear parquet L^0_r: an infinite chain of unit squares whose vertices are integer lattice points on the line ℓ=r, together with a strip or sector. It further claims that the vertices of L^0_r are exactly the limits of constrictions of L_r(ω). The proof proceeds by rescaling near the Morse critical points of the slow curve to a Riccati equation, analyzing its stable and unstable solutions via the quantum harmonic oscillator, and then assembling a periodic orbit through a sequence of stable flowboxes. A generalization, Theorem 1.11, is stated for a class of slow-fast systems on T^2 with two Morse critical points and a stable slow-fast graph.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a substantial result: it gives the first rigorous asymptotic portrait of Arnold tongues for the RSJ model in the slow-fast limit, resolving a long-standing open question of Buchstaber. The limiting parquet is derived rather than fitted, and it yields falsifiable, parameter-free predictions about phase-lock areas and constrictions. The paper also contains a nontrivial generalization to a class of slow-fast systems, and the Riccati pole-counting argument is elegant and well documented. The main risk is not the plausibility of the conclusion but the dependence of the lower-inclusion proof on an unproved, externally cited stable-flowbox lemma.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.5, Proposition 2.19; also §2.7, Claim 2.27] The lower inclusion of Theorem 1.2 and the general Theorem 1.11 rests on Proposition 2.19, which asserts that a transverse segment evolves into a flowbox O(ω)-close to the slow curve with width ≤ exp(−d/ω), uniformly over compact parameter sets. This proposition is not proved; the text refers to [28, Theorem 3 and Proposition 4] and to 'classical theory'. However, Remark 1.15 explicitly notes that [28] studies only a subfamily of (1.17), and the uniform estimate over Z_{m,ε}×Z_{k,ε} is not derived. The same issue appears in Claim 2.27, whose proof is one sentence: 'well-known from slow-fast theory' and which invokes Proposition 2.19 only when the stable graph has no horizontal segments, whereas the general graph may contain them. Since Lemma 2.16, Steps 3–5, and Claim 2.27 all use this estimate to carry orbits from one critical point to the next and to enter the target segments, this is
  2. [Theorem 1.11, displayed map after it] The composition map s ↦ (c_+, c_−) ↦ (ℓ,u) is printed with ℓ = (c_+ − c_−)/2 and u = (c_+ − c_−)/2. These two formulas are identical. Since c_± = u ± ℓ, the second coordinate must be u = (c_+ + c_−)/2. As printed, the map is degenerate and is not a linear isomorphism, which contradicts the sentence that follows ('If U = R² and the above map is the identity'). This is evidently a typo, but it needs correction and the surrounding proof should be checked against the corrected formula.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.4 heading] The section title refers to 'Statement 3) of Theorem 1.2', but Theorem 1.2 has only two numbered statements; the second statement concerns constrictions. The numbering in the heading should be adjusted.
  2. [§2.7, Step 5 and Proposition 2.14] In the proof of Step 5 and the following paragraph, the text cites 'Proposition 2.14, Statement (vi)', but Proposition 2.14 has only Statements (i)–(v). The intended reference is almost certainly Statement (v), which gives the location of x_−(a) on the upper side of Q_a.
  3. [Throughout] There are small typos: 'RJS model' should be 'RSJ model' in the introduction; 'atunnelling' has a missing space in the abstract; and 'rotatiton' appears in Remark 1.12. These do not affect the mathematics.
  4. [Reference [21] and [28]] Since Proposition 2.19 is essential but not proved, the references should be made more precise: give the exact theorem/proposition numbers, page numbers, and, if possible, state the hypotheses under which the exponential contraction is uniform in parameters. The current citation to a thesis and a paper is too vague for a load-bearing lemma.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the parquet limit is derived from slow-fast/Riccati analysis, not from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The limit parquet L_r^0 is defined directly in the rescaled parameters (1.7)-(1.9) as unions of integer-indexed strips/squares in the (u+ℓ, u-ℓ) coordinates; it is not fitted to any phase-lock data, and no parameter appearing in the limit is extracted from the phase-lock areas being predicted. The lower inclusion is proved by constructing periodic orbits (Theorem 1.13, Corollary 1.14) using the Riccati coordinate reduction (Proposition 2.1, proved in Section 2.1), the classification of heteroclinic connections c = 2m+1 (Theorem 2.10, cited to Callot and Sibuya), and the stable-flowbox machinery. These are independent mathematical inputs, not restatements of the conclusion. The upper/non-accumulation half uses monotonicity of the rotation number in s_1 (condition (vi) and Theorem 1.11 proof), again independent of the limit portrait. The author's prior work appears, e.g. [9, Lemma 5.1] is used to certify constrictions in Statement 2 of Theorem 1.2, and [33] for symmetry; these are published external results that do not themselves assert the ω→0 parquet convergence, so citing them is evidence, not a self-citation chain forcing the result. Proposition 2.19 (existence of exponentially narrow stable flowboxes) is asserted from 'classical theory' and [28] rather than proved in the paper; Remark 1.15 even notes that [28] treats a subfamily. This is a possible gap in external support or correctness risk, but it is not circularity: an unproved lemma may make the proof incomplete, but it does not make the theorem's statement an input to the argument. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction and no quantity is defined in terms of the target limit, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the integers 2m±1 arise from the L2 spectrum of the harmonic oscillator, not from data. No new physical/mathematical entities are postulated. The burden is on classical slow-fast flowbox theorems and prior structural results about phase-lock areas, which are cited and not re-derived.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Slow-fast stable flowbox theorem: a transverse segment I0 evolves into an exponentially narrow flowbox O(ω)-close to the slow curve, with width ≤ exp(−d/ω) (Proposition 2.19, cited to [28] and classical slow-fast theory).
    Invoked in Step 3 and proof of Lemma 2.16 to start the orbit near the stable solution; not proved in the paper.
  • standard math Riccati equation (1.20) has unique stable/unstable solutions and, for c∈Z_m, the stable solution has exactly m real poles with residue −1; heteroclinic connection iff c=2m+1 (Theorems 2.6–2.10, Proposition 2.13, from [21,47] and harmonic-oscillator spectral theory).
    Provides the counting of squares in the parquet; proved in the paper with citation to Stokes phenomena and L2 eigenfunctions of the quantum harmonic oscillator.
  • domain assumption Previously established RSJ facts: phase-lock boundaries are analytic graphs, constrictions lie on B=rω, and the vertical ray from (r,r−1/2) is inside L_r with boundary points constrictions ([9,17,18,33]).
    Used for the definition of constrictions and for Statement 2 of Theorem 1.2; published results by the author and coauthors/others.
  • standard math The Poincaré return map on an interval that maps a compact interval strictly into itself has a fixed point, and the rotation number is monotone in parameters when f_{s;ω} is monotone.
    Used in Corollary 1.14 and in the exclusion argument at the end of Theorem 1.11.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On phase-lock area parquet in a special slow-fast limit of model of Josephson junction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4MJ5SEOZ

@misc{pith2026260726158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On phase-lock area parquet in a special slow-fast limit of model of Josephson junction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4MJ5SEOZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26158}
}
abstract

B.Josephson (Nobel Prize, 1973) predicted a tunnelling effect for a system of two superconductors separated by a narrow dielectric (such a system is called Josephson junction): existence of a supercurrent through it and equations governing it. The overdamped Josephson junction is modeled by the family of differential equations on the torus $T^2=R^2\slash2\pi Z^2$, $\frac{d\theta}{d\tau}=\frac1{\omega}(\cos\theta+B+A\cos\tau)$, which is known as the RSJ model. It depends on three parameters: $B$ called the abscissa, $A$ called the ordinate, and a fixed frequency $\omega$. We study its rotation number $\rho(B,A;\omega)$ as a function of $(B,A)$ and the phase-lock areas: those its level subsets that have non-empty interiors. They exist only for integer values of the rotation number (Buchstaber, Karpov, Tertychnyi). In this paper we study asymptotics of the phase-lock area portrait in a special slow-fast limit, as $\omega\to0$ and $(B,A)\to(0,1)$ so that $(B,A)-(0,1)=O(\omega)$. We show that in the rescaled parameters $\ell:=\frac B{\omega}$ and $u:=\frac{A-1}{\omega}$ the phase-lock area portrait converges to a parquet with boundary lines being parallel to the lines $\{ u\pm\ell=0\}$. Namely, the limit of phase-lock area with rotation number $r$ is the union of an infinite chain of squares going up, with integer vertices and diagonals of length two lying on the line $\{\ell=r\}$, and an infinite strip going down (sector in the case, when $r=0$). We state and prove a generalization of this result to a wide class of slow-fast systems on 2-torus.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26158 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phase-lock areas and their constrictions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Limit phase-lock areas. Remark 1.3 The statement of Theorem 1.2 is difficult to observe numer￾ically. As ω is small, some numerical experience artefacts arise and distort the pictures. The following numerical phase-lock area pictures for small ω made by Artem Alexandrov, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Artem Alexandrov’s numerical pictures for small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase portrait of field (1.18) with ω = 0. segments I0 = [0, π] × {−2π 3 }, I1 := [0, π] × {π 3 }. (1.19) Each of them crosses the curve C0 and is contracted to itself by the flow of the unperturbed vector field (1.18), which is directed to the right at its left end an…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase portrait of field (1.17) with c± = u±ℓ > 0 and small ω > 0. Segments Ij , their periodic shifts and their stable flowboxes. converges to C0, as ω → 0. It is well-known from the slow-fast theory that for small ω the forward orbit of each segment Ij , j = 0, 1 unde…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase portrait of field (1.17) with small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase portrait of field (1.17) with c± = u±ℓ > 0 and small ω > 0. Segment I0 and its stable flowbox. Fix arbitrary τ1, τ2, τb0 < τ1 < τ2 < 0, and set S := {τ1 ≤ τ ≤ τ2}. (2.26) Proposition 2.19 The orbit O(I0) intersects S by a narrow flowbox de￾noted by F−(I0) and cal…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Duck hunting with quantum mechanics

    nlin.PS 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Möbius-type slow-fast systems such as the overdamped Josephson junction, canards exist in parameter windows of width exp(-S_inst/2ω), where S_inst is the β-cycle instanton action.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [28]

    J.,1(2001), No

    Ilyashenko, Yu.; Guckenheimer, J.The duck and the devil: canards on the staircase.Moscow Math. J.,1(2001), No. 1, 27–47

    2001

  2. [1]

    W.; Rowell, J

    Anderson, P. W.; Rowell, J. M.Probable observation of the Josephson tunnel effect.Phys. Rev. Lett.10 (6)(1963): 230–232

    1963

  3. [2]

    Andreev, F.; Kitaev, A.Connection formulae for asymptotics of the fifth Painlev´ e transcendent on the real axis.Nonlinearity,13(2000), 1801– 1840

    2000

  4. [3]

    I.Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Dif- ferential Equations.Second edition

    Arnold, V. I.Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Dif- ferential Equations.Second edition. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 250. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988

    1988

  5. [4]

    I.; Ilyashenko, Yu

    Arnold, V. I.; Ilyashenko, Yu. S.Ordinary differential equations.In: Dy- namical Systems I, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci. (1988), 1–148

    1988

  6. [5]

    I.; Afrajmovich, V.S.; Ilyashenko, Yu

    Arnold, V. I.; Afrajmovich, V.S.; Ilyashenko, Yu. S.; Shilnikov L.P.Bi- furcation theory.In: Dynamical Systems V, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci. (1994), 1–205

    1994

  7. [6]

    Balser, W

    W. Balser, W. B. Jurkat, D. A. Lutz,A general theory of invariants for meromorphic differential equations. I. Formal invariants. Funkcialaj Ekvacioj,22:2(1979), 197–221. 46

    1979

  8. [7]

    Balser, W.; Jurkat, W.B.; Lutz, D.A.Birkhoff invariants and Stokes’ multipliers for meromorphic linear differential equations.J. Math. Anal. Appl.71(1979), No. 1, 48–94

    1979

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Barone, A.; Paterno, G.Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect.John Wiley and Sons, New York–Chichester–Brisbane–Toronto– Singapore, 1982

    1982

  2. [9]

    Bibilo, Yu.; Glutsyuk, A.On families of constrictions in model of over- damped Josephson junction and Painlev´ e 3 equation.- Nonlinearity,35 (2022), 5427–5480

    2022

  3. [10]

    Bibilo, Y.; Glutsyuk, A.A.On family of constrictions in model of over- damped Josephson junction.Russ. Math. Surveys.76:2(2021), 360–362

    2021

  4. [11]

    Bizyaev, I.A.; Borisov, A.V.; Mamaev, I.S.The Hess–Appelrot case and quantization of the rotation number.Reg. Chaot. Dyn.,22:2(2017), 180–196

    2017

  5. [12]

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Glutsyuk, A.A.On determinants of modified Bessel functions and entire solutions of double confluent Heun equations.Non- linearity,29(2016), 3857–3870

    2016

  6. [13]

    Steklov Inst

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Glutsyuk, A.A.On monodromy eigenfunctions of Heun equations and boundaries of phase-lock areas in a model of over- damped Josephson effect.Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.,297(2017), 50–89

    2017

  7. [14]

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychniy, S.I.Electrodynamic prop- erties of a Josephson junction biased with a sequence ofδ-function pulses. J. Exper. Theoret. Phys.,93(2001), No. 6, 1280–1287

    2001

  8. [15]

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I.On properties of the differential equation describing the dynamics of an overdamped Josephson junction,Russ. Math. Surveys,59:2(2004), 377–378

    2004

  9. [16]

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I.Peculiarities of dy- namics of a Josephson junction shifted by a sinusoidal SHF current.[In Russian.] Radiotekhnika i Elektronika,51:6(2006), 757–762

    2006

  10. [17]

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I.The rotation number quantization effect. Theoret. and Math. Phys.,162(2010), No. 2, 211–221

    2010

  11. [18]

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I.The system on torus modeling the dynamics of Josephson junction.Russ. Math. Surveys,67 (2012), No. 1, 178–180. 47

    2012

  12. [19]

    and Math

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Tertychnyi, S.I.Explicit solution family for the equa- tion of the resistively shunted Josephson junction model.Theoret. and Math. Phys.,176(2013), No. 2, 965–986

    2013

  13. [20]

    and Math

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Tertychnyi, S.I.Holomorphic solutions of the double confluent Heun equation associated with the RSJ model of the Josephson junction.Theoret. and Math. Phys.,182:3(2015), 329–355

    2015

  14. [21]

    IRMA, Universit´ e Louis Pasteur, Stras- bourg, 1981

    Callot, J.-L.Bifurcations du portrait de phase pour des ´ equations diff´ erentielles lin´ eaires du second ordre ayant pour type l’´ equation d’Hermite.Th` ese de Doctorat. IRMA, Universit´ e Louis Pasteur, Stras- bourg, 1981

    1981

  15. [22]

    Foote, R.L.,Geometry of the Prytz Planimeter.Reports on Math. Phys. 42:1/2(1998), 249–271

    1998

  16. [23]

    Foote, R.L.; Levi, M.; Tabachnikov, S.Tractrices, bicycle tire tracks, hatchet planimeters, and a 100-year-old conjecture.Amer. Math. Monthly, 120(2013), 199–216

    2013

  17. [24]

    Glutsyuk, A.A.; Kleptsyn, V.A.; Filimonov, D.A.; Schurov, I.V.On the adjacency quantization in an equation modeling the Josephson effect. Funct. Analysis and Appl.,48(2014), No. 4, 272–285

    2014

  18. [25]

    Glutsyuk A.On constrictions of phase-lock areas in model of over- damped Josephson effect and transition matrix of the double-confluent Heun equation.J. Dyn. Control Syst.25(2019), Issue 3, 323–349

    2019

  19. [26]

    Glutsyuk, A.; Netay, I.On spectral curves and complexified boundaries of phase-lock areas in a model of Josephson junction.– J. Dyn. Control Systems, 26 (2020), 785–820

    2020

  20. [27]

    Dynamical systems

    Ilyashenko, Yu.S.Lectures of the summer school “Dynamical systems”. Poprad, Slovak Republic, 2009, unpublished

    2009

  21. [29]

    Analysis and its Appl.45(2011), No

    Ilyashenko, Yu.S.; Filimonov, D.A.; Ryzhov, D.A.Phase-lock effect for equations modeling resistively shunted Josephson junctions and for their perturbations.Funct. Analysis and its Appl.45(2011), No. 3, 192–203

    2011

  22. [30]

    Josephson, B.D.,Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett.,1(1962), No. 7, 251–253. 48

    1962

  23. [31]

    Jurkat W.B.; Lutz D.A.; Peyerimhoff A.Birkhoff invariants and effec- tive calculations for meromorphic linear differential equations.– J. Math. Anal. Appl.53(1976), No. 2, 438–470

    1976

  24. [32]

    Mathematical physics and Modelling,8(2013), 31–46

    Kleptsyn, V.A.; Romaskevich, O.L.; Schurov, I.V.Josephson effect and slow-fast systems.[In Russian.] Nanostuctures. Mathematical physics and Modelling,8(2013), 31–46

    2013

  25. [33]

    Klimenko, A.V; Romaskevich, O.L.Asymptotic properties of Arnold tongues and Josephson effect.Mosc. Math. J.,14:2(2014), 367–384

    2014

  26. [34]

    Levinson, Y.Quantum noise in a current-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. B,67(2003), 184504

    2003

  27. [35]

    Likharev, K.K.Dynamics of Josephson junctions and circuits.Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1986

    1986

  28. [36]

    [In Russian.] Moscow, Nauka, 1985

    Likharev, K.K.Introduction to the dynamics of Josephson junctions. [In Russian.] Moscow, Nauka, 1985

    1985

  29. [37]

    MGU, Moscow, 1978

    Likharev, K.K.; Ulrikh, B.T.Systems with Josephson junctions: Basic Theory.[In Russian.] Izdat. MGU, Moscow, 1978

    1978

  30. [38]

    Lyapunov, A.M.On one property of the differential equations of the problem of movement of a heavy solid body with a fixed point.[In Russian]. Comm. Kharkov Math. Society, Serial II, Vol.IV(1894), No. 3, 123–140

  31. [39]

    McCumber, D.E.Effect of ac impedance on dc voltage-current charac- teristics of superconductor weak-link junctions,J. Appl. Phys.,39(1968), No. 7, 3113–3118

    1968

  32. [40]

    Plenum Press, New York and London, 1980

    Mishchenko, E.F.; Rozov, N.Kh.Differential Equations with Small Pa- rameters and Relaxation Oscillations.In: Mathematical concepts and methods in science an engineering,13. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1980

    1980

  33. [41]

    Physics Science Department of the Imperial Society of Amateurs of Natural Sciences,VI (1893), 43–52

    Mlodzejewski, B.C.; Nekrassov, P.A.On conditions of existence of asymptotic periodic movement in Hess’ problem.Proc. Physics Science Department of the Imperial Society of Amateurs of Natural Sciences,VI (1893), 43–52

  34. [42]

    ´Etude analytique d’un cas de mouvement d’un corps pesant autour d’un point fixe.Mat

    Nekrassov, P.A. ´Etude analytique d’un cas de mouvement d’un corps pesant autour d’un point fixe.Mat. Sb.,18(1896), No. 2, 161–274. 49

  35. [43]

    Pontryagin, L.S.Asymptotic behavior of solutions of systems of differ- ential equations with a small parameter in the derivatives of highest order. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.,21:5(1957), 605–626

    1957

  36. [44]

    Renne, M.J.; Polder, D.Some analytical results for the resistively shunted Josephson junction.Revue de Physique Appliqu´ ee,9 (1)(1974), 25–28

    1974

  37. [45]

    Schmidt, V.V.,Introduction to physics of superconductors.[In Russian.] MCCME, Moscow, 2000

    2000

  38. [46]

    Shapiro, S.; Janus, A.; Holly, S.Effect of microwaves on Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling,Rev. Mod. Phys.,36(1964), 223– 225

    1964

  39. [47]

    North- Holland, 1975

    Sibuya, Y.Global theory of a second order linear ordinary differential equation with a polynomial coefficient.In: Mathematics Studies 18. North- Holland, 1975

    1975

  40. [48]

    Sibuya Y.Stokes phenomena.– Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,83(1977), 1075–1077

    1977

  41. [49]

    Stewart, W.C.Current-voltage characteristics of Josephson junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett.,12(1968), No. 8, 277–280

    1968

  42. [50]

    Stolyarov, V.S. et al.Shapiro steps in ballistic Josephson junction based on a single Bi 2Te2.3Se0.7 nanocrystal.– Communications Materials7 (2026), Article No 91, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-026-01095-z

    2026 doi

  43. [51]

    Tertychnyi, S.I.Long-term behavior of solutions of the equation ˙ϕ+ sinϕ=fwith periodicfand the modeling of dynamics of overdamped Josephson junctions.Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0512058

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Tertychnyi, S.I.The modeling of a Josephson junction and Heun poly- nomials.Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0601064

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Watson, G.N.,A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions (2nd. ed.). Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1966

    1966

  46. [54]

    In Collected Works1(1937), Moscow, Gostekhizdat, 332–348

    Zhukovsky, N.E.Hess’ Loxodromic Pendulum.[In Russian]. In Collected Works1(1937), Moscow, Gostekhizdat, 332–348. 50

    1937

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.