Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 178 references

QKD-Integrated Quantum Noise Stream Cipher: An Overview

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read QKD can refresh the seed keys of quantum noise stream ciphers, giving optical links both provable security and high speed.

desk verdict A useful but uneven review of QNSC and QKD-QNSC integration: the experimental catalog is valuable, while the security framing oversells Y-00's information-theoretic status. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26550 v1 pith:SW3NEWRC submitted 2026-07-29 quant-ph

Umesh Kumar Chandra , Avinash Kote , Neha Pathania , Ken Tanizawa , Fumio Futami , Prem Kumar , Sandeep Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.67.Dd
keywords QuantumKeyDistributionNoiseStreamCipherY-00protocolPhysical-layerencryptionCoherent-statemodulationmaskingOpticalcommunicationSeedrefresh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review's central thesis is that quantum key distribution (QKD) and quantum noise stream ciphers (QNSC) complement each other: QKD's slow but provably secure key exchange can supply and periodically refresh the seed key that QNSC needs to obscure data inside quantum noise at high speed. The paper surveys QNSC's operating principles, noise-masking security model, known attacks (ciphertext-only, known-plaintext, correlation, polarity inversion, collective), and the handful of experimental hybrid systems—including a 70 Gbit/s QNSC link whose seed key was refreshed by CV-QKD—to argue that the integration is practical and that it raises the bar for an eavesdropper, who now must defeat both layers at once. It then identifies open challenges: stabilizing constellations, synchronizing QKD with high-speed channels, and extending security proofs to practical attack models.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the Y-00 (αη) quantum noise stream cipher's noise-masking property: data is mapped onto a dense set of non-orthogonal coherent states selected by a running key, so quantum shot noise and amplifier noise overlap adjacent constellation points. A legitimate receiver who knows the key can still distinguish the states; an eavesdropper who does not faces an error probability that approaches 1/2 as the modulation multiplicity grows. In the integrated architecture, QKD continuously replaces the seed key from which the running key is derived, converting the cipher's chief operational weakness—reliance on pre-shared secrets—into a periodically refreshed, provably secure input.

What would settle it

A concrete measurement or cryptanalysis showing that a key-ignorant receiver can reliably recover the plaintext (or the running key) from a Y-00 signal whose masking number Γ matches the paper's regime—for example, a known-plaintext attack with |K_s| ≈ 100 that recovers the seed key in feasible time, or an experimental eavesdropper achieving a symbol error rate significantly below the predicted ≈1/2—would refute the assertion that quantum noise, rather than PRNG complexity, is the source of security.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' framing, the paper establishes that an integrated QKD–QNSC architecture is a unified security framework: the information-theoretically secure keys generated by QKD are used not as the encryption key itself but as the ever-refreshed seed for the pseudo-random basis selection that drives QNSC. Since QNSC's physical-layer masking already pushes an eavesdropper's error probability toward 1/2, and QKD removes the weak point of static pre-shared keys, the integrated system requires an adversary to break both the QKD key-distribution channel and the quantum-noise-masked data channel. The surveyed demonstrations—450 kb/s over 27 km in the first hybrid, 70 Gbit/s over 100 km with key

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument hinges on the claim that Y-00's security comes from quantum noise and not from the computational hardness of its pseudo-random generator—a claim that the paper reviews but does not independently prove.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An eavesdropper must now defeat two independent security layers—QKD's key distribution and QNSC's physical-layer masking—instead of one.
  • Because QKD key rates (hundreds of bit/s) are orders of magnitude below the data rate, the seed key can be refreshed every 0.5–1 s without throttling encryption; this mitigates key reuse and correlation attacks.
  • QNSC transmission reaches hundreds to thousands of kilometres, with terabit-scale WDM demonstrations, implying the hybrid architecture can sustain backbone-network capacities.
  • Security analysis of QNSC against collective attacks via the Holevo quantity gives a positive secure rate for realistic parameters (e.g., M_b = 31 bases, 300 km), and QKD further supports security against coherent and collective attacks.
  • The architecture rides on existing optical hardware and modulation formats (IMDD, PSK, QAM, OFDM), making it compatible with current telecom infrastructure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Y-00 security is not genuinely quantum-rooted, the integrated system collapses to a classical stream cipher with a QKD-refreshed key; the paper's own review of the debate does not itself settle the question, so an independent re-derivation of Y-00 security would materially change the strength of the whole architecture.
  • The 0.5–1 s refresh window means a fixed seed key is in use for many giga-symbols; a natural design question the paper leaves open is how many symbols can be safely encrypted per seed, and whether interleaving multiple QKD-derived seeds can shrink the window.
  • The same noise-masking effect has been demonstrated in free-space and underwater channels, so the QKD-integrated architecture could plausibly be transplanted to FSO and underwater links, where QKD would have to be adapted to the same channel.
  • The review's framing suggests a broader research program: QKD may eventually serve as a generic 'key fountain' for physical-layer encryption schemes, not only Y-00, provided those schemes can absorb continuous key refresh.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of Quantum Noise Stream Ciphers (Y-00/QNSC) and their proposed integration with Quantum Key Distribution. It reviews QKD fundamentals and protocol classifications (Section 2, Table 1), QNSC operating principles and modulation formats (Section 3, Table 2), a security framework covering ciphertext-only, known-plaintext, correlation, polarity-inversion, and collective attacks (Section 4), and the small set of experimental hybrid QKD-QNSC systems (Table 3, Section 5). The central claim is that continuous refresh of the QNSC seed key by QKD yields a unified, 'provably secure' framework that couples information-theoretic key establishment with high-speed physical-layer encryption. The paper concludes with open challenges and future directions.

Significance. The survey has real value as a compilation: Table 2 collects a broad range of IM/PSK/QAM QNSC demonstrations, and Table 3 assembles the three principal QKD-QNSC hybrid experiments. The generalized architecture in Fig. 7 is a useful organizing device. If the central security claim were established, the proposed architecture would indeed be attractive for high-capacity optical networks. However, the paper is descriptive rather than analytical: it offers no independent proof or balanced assessment of Y-00 security, and several factual entries in Table 1 are incorrect. These issues bear directly on the advertised 'provably secure' framing, so the manuscript needs substantial revision before the central claim can be accepted as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The Boaron et al. (2018) row lists the scheme as Entanglement-based, but reference [11] is a decoy-state BB84 prepare-and-measure experiment. The Zhang, Jiawei et al. (2025) row lists a 'DV' key rate of 37.6 Tbps, but reference [29] reports 47×800 Gbps classical communication coexisting with QKD over 101.6 km HCF; 37.6 Tbps is the classical traffic rate, not a QKD key rate. Since a survey's reliability rests on its tables, these are load-bearing errors and Table 1 needs a systematic pass.
  2. [Section 4 / Section 3.4] The security debate is presented as settled: Section 4 states that published comments, replies, and counter-replies 'were successfully refuted by Yuen et al.' and Section 3.4 calls the system 'immune to attacks [71]'. The cited sequence includes the original critiques as well as replies from both sides, so this is a one-sided characterization. More importantly, Section 4.2 concedes that 'in theory, she can decrypt the Y-00 protocol' and the defense is a work-factor estimate Q2 O(|Ks|dw) Q1 >> 2^{|Ks|}. That is a computational-hardness argument, not a quantum information-theoretic one. If Y-00 security rests on computational work factors, the integrated QKD-QNSC system reduces to a classical stream cipher with QKD-refreshed keys, and the abstract's 'provably secure' / 'quantum-secured' claim is not established. Section 6.1 itself lists rigorous security analyses under realistic noise and
  3. [Section 4.1-4.2] The Gröbner-basis multiplicity estimates Q1 and Q2 are load-bearing for the claim that Y-00 security is 'not solely computational', but they are not derived and their notation is undefined. In particular, Γ(|κ|) and |κ| are not defined, and the difference between Q1 and Q2 is unclear. As written, these displayed expressions cannot support the conclusion that algebraic attacks are computationally infeasible. Please supply definitions, derivations, or precise citations to the source proofs.
  4. [Section 4.3, Eq. (6)] The 'effective crossover probability' formula appears to be algebraically wrong. With p = Pr(K_I = K_R) and q = Pr(K_R = x_n), the probability that K_I differs from x_n is p + q - 2pq, not 1 - (p + q) + 2pq; the latter is the probability that K_I agrees with x_n. This affects the subsequent statement that p → 1/2 drives p_e → 1/2 and the correlation-attack argument that follows. Please re-derive and correct Eq. (6).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2] The sentence 'the classical channel must be authenticated without authentication' is self-contradictory; presumably it should read 'must be authenticated' or 'cannot be authenticated without pre-shared keys'.
  2. [Section 2.2.1] The sentence 'GG02 remains the principal exemplar of this category is the primary example of this approach' contains a duplicated predicate and should be rewritten.
  3. [Section 4] The paragraph introducing the 'third theorem' is not a recognizable theorem and is unintelligible as written. If a specific result is intended, state it precisely and cite it; otherwise remove it.
  4. [Eq. (2)] Both P_0 and \bar{P}_0 appear with overlapping roles. Please define the received optical power, its average, and the reference bandwidth more carefully so the noise-masking formulas are unambiguous.
  5. [Table 1] The 'Guarda et al. (2023)' row gives distance as '55dB', which is a channel loss, not a distance; the table header should be adjusted. Also, the 'Kleis et al. (2017)' row cites reference [74], which in the bibliography is a 2023 paper with a different title; the citation is mismatched.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial self-citation in the Y-00 security debate; the QKD-QNSC integration claim itself is supported by independent experimental work.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4, opening paragraph; also Section 1 via ref. [95]]
    "The security of the Y-00 protocol has been vigorously contested through a series of published comments, replies, and counter-replies, all of which were successfully refuted by Yuen et al. and collaborating groups through rigorous quantitative analysis [96, 103, 104, 162, 164, 166]."

    The load-bearing security premise—that Y-00/QNSC is genuinely quantum-secure and hence QKD-integrated QNSC forms a 'unified security framework'—is settled by citing the refutation chain of Yuen and co-authors, several of whom overlap with this paper's authors ([162], [164], [166] include P. Kumar; [95] also includes P. Kumar). The review does not reproduce the quantitative analysis or engage the critiques on their merits; it asserts that the debate was won by the same group whose conclusion is being adopted. Because the integration claim is additionally supported by external experimental groups (Nakazawa et al. [98,101]; Shi & Xiao [116]), the circularity is partial rather than total.

full rationale

This is a review paper, so its 'derivations' are reconstructions of cited results rather than new predictions. I found no step where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction or where an equation reduces to its own input by construction. The one potentially circular element is the security premise: the claim that Y-00/QNSC is quantum-secure is supported by a comment/reply chain in which the present paper's co-author (P. Kumar) is one of the authors asserting the refutation, and the theoretical foundation [95] also includes a co-author. The review quotes this self-referential debate as settled ('successfully refuted by Yuen et al.') without presenting the quantitative analysis. This is load-bearing for the 'unified provable security' framing, though not for the basic architectural proposal. The integration claim itself is supported by independent experimental groups (Nakazawa et al. [98,101]; Shi & Xiao [116]) and by the paper's own candid caveat in Section 6 that rigorous security analyses remain open, which reduces the weight of the security claim. Accordingly I assign 4 rather than a higher score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Review paper; no new fitted parameters or invented entities. The central claim rests on contested security assumptions inherited from the cited Y-00 literature; these are recorded as axioms.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Non-orthogonal coherent states cannot be perfectly discriminated, imposing a minimum error probability for an unkeyed receiver.
    Invoked in Sections 3.2 and 4; underlies the claimed detection asymmetry between Eve and a keyed receiver.
  • domain assumption The noise masking number Γ, as defined in Eqs. (2)-(5), is a valid and sufficient security metric for QNSC.
    Used throughout Section 3.2 and Table 2 to rank security; no proof of sufficiency is given in this review.
  • standard math Eve's optimal collective measurement and the Holevo bound correctly characterize the information available to an attacker.
    Used in Section 4.5, Eqs. (10)-(11), to argue a positive secure rate.
  • domain assumption The contested Y-00 security results from the in-house literature are correct, and published critiques were successfully refuted.
    Section 4 dismisses critiques [103,104] in one sentence without reproducing the counterarguments; the review's security case depends on this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QKD-Integrated Quantum Noise Stream Cipher: An Overview." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SW3NEWRC

@misc{pith2026260726550,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QKD-Integrated Quantum Noise Stream Cipher: An Overview},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SW3NEWRC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26550}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum Noise Stream Cipher (QNSC) has emerged as a physical-layer encryption technique that exploits quantum noise and non-orthogonal coherent-state modulation to secure optical communication. However, the security of QNSC relies exceedingly on the secrecy and freshness of its seed key. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), on the other hand, provides information-theoretically secure key exchange rooted in the laws of quantum mechanics. The convergence of these two paradigms, i.e., integrated QKD-QNSC architectures, offers a compelling solution to each of their limitations. In such integrated systems, QKD continuously supplies and refreshes the secret seed key that governs QNSC modulation. Thus, governing a unified security framework that couples provably secure key establishment with high-speed quantum-enhanced physical-layer encryption. This work presents a comprehensive review of QNSC systems, examining their operating principles, security models under various attacks, and their integration with QKD systems. We analyze the security interplay between the key generation and encryption layers and survey experimental demonstrations and architectural progress toward practical deployment. Furthermore, we identify the open challenges and future research directions that must be addressed to realize fully integrated, quantum-secured optical communication networks at a practical scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26550 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a generic QKD system illustrating quantum signal generation, transmission, detection, classical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Classification of QKD protocols based on their quantum encoding schemes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A schematic for a QNSC-based communication system. The running key [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of noise masking in high-order modulation schemes: (a) 32-level IM, (b) 32-PSK constellation, and (c) 64-QAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Generalized Alice–Bob architecture of a QNSC-based secure optical communication system, illustrating PRBS-driven key [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Figure shows "Store Now, Decrypt Later", a threat from quantum storage-based attacks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Integrated QKD–QNSC secure optical communication architecture, where the lower layer (CV-QKD) establishes synchronized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

178 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Alberto Boaron, Gianluca Boso, Davide Rusca, Cédric Vulliez, Claire Autebert, Misael Caloz, Matthieu Perrenoud, Gaëtan Gras, Félix Bussières, Ming-Jun Li, et al. 2018. Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber.Physical review letters121, 19 (2018), 190502

    2018

  2. [29]

    Tianqi Dou, Weiwen Kong, Lei Zhang, Song Gao, Lipeng Feng, Zhenhua Li, Yuheng Xie, Wenpeng Gao, Peizhe Han, Peng Li, et al. 2025. Experimental Demonstration of47× 800Gbps Classical Communication and QKD Coexistence Over 101.6 km HCF. In2025 European Conference on Optical Communications (ECOC). IEEE, Europe, 1–4

    2025

  3. [71]

    Kentaro Kato. 2016. Quantum enigma cipher as a generalization of the quantum stream cipher. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging XIV, Vol. 9980. SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, 998005

    2016

  4. [1]

    Banwell, P

    T. Banwell, P. Toliver, J.C. Young, J. Hodge, M. Rauch, M.S. Goodman, G. Kanter, E. Conrdorf, V.S. Grigoryan, C. Liang, and P. Kumar. 2005. High data rate quantum noise protected encryption over long distances. InMILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference. Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 398–404 Vol. 1. doi:10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605716

    arXiv 2005

  5. [2]

    Barbosa, Eric Corndorf, Prem Kumar, and Horace P

    Geraldo A. Barbosa, Eric Corndorf, Prem Kumar, and Horace P. Yuen. 2003. Secure Communication Using Mesoscopic Coherent States.Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (Jun 2003), 227901. Issue 22. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.227901 2003

  6. [3]

    John S Bell. 1964. On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox.Physics Physique Fizika1, 3 (1964), 195

    1964

  7. [4]

    Charles H. Bennett. 1992. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states.Physical Review Letters68, 21 (1992), 3121–3124

    1992

  8. [5]

    Charles H Bennett, François Bessette, Gilles Brassard, Louis Salvail, and John Smolin. 1992. Experimental quantum cryptography.Journal of cryptology5, 1 (1992), 3–28

    1992

Show all 178 references
  1. [6]

    Bennett and Gilles Brassard

    Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard. 1984. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing.Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing175 (1984), 8

    1984

  2. [7]

    Charles H Bennett and Gilles Brassard. 1984. An update on quantum cryptography. InWorkshop on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques. Springer, 475–480

    1984

  3. [8]

    Charles H Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, and Ueli M Maurer. 1995. Generalized privacy amplification.IEEE Transactions on Information theory41, 6 (1995), 1915–1923

    1995

  4. [9]

    Bennett, Gilles Brassard, and N

    Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, and N. David Mermin. 1992. Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem.Physical Review Letters68, 5 (1992), 557–559

    1992

  5. [10]

    Biham, Boyer, Brassard, and Mor. 2002. Security of quantum key distribution against all collective attacks.Algorithmica34, 4 (2002), 372–388

    2002

  6. [12]

    Samuel L Braunstein and Peter Van Loock. 2005. Quantum information with continuous variables.Reviews of modern physics77, 2 (2005), 513–577

    2005

  7. [13]

    Aitor Brazaola-Vicario, Alejandra Ruiz, Oscar Lage, Eduardo Jacob, and Jasone Astorga. 2024. Quantum key distribution: a survey on current vulnerability trends and potential implementation risks.Opt. Continuum3, 8 (Aug 2024), 1438–1460. doi:10.1364/OPTCON.530352

    2024 doi

  8. [14]

    Brunner, T

    H. Brunner, T. Gehring, and U. L. Andersen. 2020. High-speed Gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a local oscillator.Physical Review Applied13 (2020), 044015

    2020

  9. [15]

    Umesh Kumar Chandra, Mohammed Haneef V A, Neha Pathania, and Sandeep Kumar Singh. 2025. Performance Evaluation of AES-enhanced Y-00 Quantum Noise Encryption Scheme for Secure Optical Transmission. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Manuscript submitt...

    2025

  10. [16]

    Peter Cheeseman. 1991. Where the really hard problems are. InInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Sydney, Australia

    1991

  11. [17]

    Xi Chen, Ken Tanizawa, Peter Winzer, Po Dong, Junho Cho, Fumio Futami, Kentaro Kato, Argishti Melikyan, and KW Kim. 2021. Experimental demonstration of a 4,294,967,296-QAM-based Y-00 quantum stream cipher template carrying 160-Gb/s 16-QAM signals.Optics Express29, 4 (2021), 5658–5664

    2021

  12. [18]

    LC Comandar, M Lucamarini, B Fröhlich, JF Dynes, AW Sharpe, SW-B Tam, ZL Yuan, RV Penty, and AJ Shields. 2016. Quantum key distribution without detector vulnerabilities using optically seeded lasers.Nature Photonics10, 5 (2016), 312–315

    2016

  13. [19]

    Corndorf, G.S

    E. Corndorf, G.S. Kanter, Chuang Liang, and P. Kumar. 2004. Quantum-noise protected data encryption for WDM networks. InConference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2004. (CLEO)., Vol. 2. 1082–1084

    2004

  14. [20]

    Kanter, Chuang Liang, and Prem Kumar

    Eric Corndorf, Gregory S. Kanter, Chuang Liang, and Prem Kumar. 2004. Data encryption over an inline-amplified 200-km-long WDM line using coherent-state quantum cryptography. InQuantum Information and Computation II, Eric Donkor, Andrew R. Pirich, and Howard E. Brandt (Eds.), ...

    2004 doi

  15. [21]

    Barbosa, and Horace P

    Eric Corndorf, Prem Kumar, Chuang Liang, Geraldo A. Barbosa, and Horace P. Yuen. 2004. Efficient quantum cryptography with coherent-state light in optical fibers at Gbps rates. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging, Ronald E. Meyers and Yanhua Shih (Eds.), Vol. 5161. In...

    2004 doi

  16. [22]

    Eric Corndorf, Chuang Liang, Gregory S Kanter, Prem Kumar, and Horace P Yuen. 2005. Quantum-noise: protected data encryption for WDM fiber-optic networks.ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review34, 5 (2005), 21–30

    2005

  17. [23]

    Eric Corndorf, Chuang Liang, Gregory S Kanter, Prem Kumar, and Horace P Yuen. 2005. Quantum-noise randomized data encryption for wavelength-division-multiplexed fiber-optic networks.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics71, 6 (2005), 062326

    2005

  18. [24]

    Nicolas T Courtois. 2003. Fast algebraic attacks on stream ciphers with linear feedback. InAnnual international cryptology conference. Springer, 176–194

    2003

  19. [25]

    Nicolas T Courtois and Willi Meier. 2003. Algebraic attacks on stream ciphers with linear feedback. InInternational Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Springer, 345–359

    2003

  20. [26]

    Eleni Diamanti and Anthony Leverrier. 2015. Distributing secret keys with quantum continuous variables: principle, security and implementations. Entropy17, 9 (2015), 6072–6092

    2015

  21. [27]

    Yoshifumi Doi, Shigeto Akutsu, Makoto Honda, Katsuyoshi Harasawa, Osamu Hirota, Satoki Kawanishi, Kenichi Ohhata, and Kiichi Yamashita

  22. [28]

    Stéphane Donnet, Andrew Thangaraj, Matthieu Bloch, Johann Cussey, Jean-Marc Merolla, and Laurent Larger. 2006. Security of Y-00 under heterodyne measurement and fast correlation attack.Physics letters A356, 6 (2006), 406–410

    2006

  23. [30]

    Artur K. Ekert. 1991. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem.Physical Review Letters67, 6 (1991), 661–663

    1991

  24. [31]

    Réjane Forré. 1989. A fast correlation attack on nonlinearly feedforward filtered shift-register sequences. InWorkshop on the Theory and Application of of Cryptographic Techniques. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 586–595

    1989

  25. [32]

    Fabian Furrer, Torsten Franz, Mario Berta, Anthony Leverrier, Volkher B Scholz, Marco Tomamichel, and Reinhard F Werner. 2012. Continuous variable quantum key distribution: finite-key analysis of composable security against coherent attacks.Physical review letters109, 10 (2012...

    2012

  26. [33]

    Fumio Futam, Ken Tanizawa, and Kentaro Kato. 2019. Y-00 quantum stream cipher for physical layer security of optical communications. In45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2019). IET, Dublin, Ireland, 1–4

    2019

  27. [34]

    Fumio Futami. 2014. Experimental demonstrations of Y-00 cipher for high capacity and secure optical fiber communications.Quantum Information Processing13, 10 (2014), 2277–2291. doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0771-5

    2014 doi

  28. [35]

    Fumio Futami, Kyle Guan, Jurgen Gripp, Kentaro Kato, Ken Tanizawa, Sethumadhavan Chandrasekhar, and Peter J Winzer. 2017. Y-00 quantum stream cipher overlay in a coherent 256-Gbit/s polarization multiplexed 16-QAM WDM system.Optics Express25, 26 (2017), 33338–33349

    2017

  29. [36]

    Fumio Futami and Osamu Hirota. 2011. Experimental Observation of Masking Intensity-Modulation Y-00 Signals at 10 Gb/s by Noise for Secure Optical Communication.Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Research Institute Bulletin1, 1 (2011), 29–31

    2011

  30. [37]

    Fumio Futami and Osamu Hirota. 2011. Masking of 4096-level Intensity Modulation Signals by Noises for Secure Communication Employing Y-00 Cipher Protocol. InEuropean Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC) Technical Digest. Optica Publishing Group (OSA), Geneva, Switzerland...

    2011

  31. [38]

    Fumio Futami and Osamu Hirota. 2014. Demonstration of 2.5 Gbit/sec Free Space Optical Communication by Using Y-00 Cipher Toward Secure Aviation Systems. InProceedings of SPIE – Photonics Applications for A viation, Aerospace, Commercial, and Harsh Environments V, Vol. 9202. SP...

    2014 doi

  32. [39]

    Fumio Futami and Osamu Hirota. 2014. Transmission of 100 Gbit/s (10×10 Gbit/s) Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher for Secure Communication. Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Research Institute Bulletin4, 1 (2014), 15–17. Manuscript submitted to ACM QKD-Integrated Quantum Noise Stream Ci...

    2014

  33. [40]

    Fumio Futami, Kentaro Kato, and Osamu Hirota. 2017. A novel transceiver of the Y-00 quantum stream cipher with the randomization technique for optical communication with higher security performance. InProceedings of SPIE, Vol. 9980. SPIE, San Diego, California, USA, 99800O. do...

    2017 doi

  34. [41]

    Fumio Futami and Ken Tanizawa. 2019. Theoretical Investigation of Noise Masking Effect by Quantum Noise in Intensity Modulation Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher.Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Research Institute Bulletin9, 1 (2019), 45–47

    2019

  35. [42]

    Fumio Futami, Ken Tanizawa, Abdelmoula Bekkali, and Hideo Fujita. 2020. Secure Free-Space Optical Transmission of Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher with 4096-Level Intensity Modulated Signals. In14th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO-PR) 2020. Optica Publishin...

    2020 doi

  36. [43]

    Fumio Futami, Ken Tanizawa, and Kentaro Kato. 2020. Y-00 Quantum-Noise Randomized Stream Cipher Using Intensity Modulation Signals for Physical Layer Security of Optical Communications.IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology38, 10 (2020), 2773–2780. doi:10.1109/JLT.2020.2985709

    2020

  37. [44]

    Fumio Futami, Ken Tanizawa, and Kentaro Kato. 2022. Experimental demonstration of quantum deliberate signal randomization for Y-00 quantum noise stream cipher. In2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO). Optica Publishing Group, San Jose, California, USA, JW3B–107

    2022

  38. [45]

    Fumio Futami, Ken Tanizawa, and Kentaro Kato. 2023. Field-installed fiber transmission of Y-00 quantum noise stream cipher with quantum deliberate signal randomization. InNext-Generation Optical Communication: Components, Sub-Systems, and Systems XII, Vol. 12429. SPIE, San Fra...

    2023

  39. [46]

    Fumio Futami, Ken Tanizawa, Kentaro Kato, and Osamu Hirota. 2017. Experimental investigation of security parameters of Y-00 quantum stream cipher transceiver with randomization technique: Part I. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging XV, Vol. 10409. SPIE, San Diego, Cal...

    2017

  40. [47]

    Fumio Futami, Ken Tanizawa, Kentaro Kato, and Osamu Hirota. 2019. 1,000-km Transmission of 1.5-Gb/s Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher using 4096-level Intensity Modulation Signals. InConference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) 2019, SW3O.4. Optica Publishing Group, San Jose, CA, U...

    2019 doi

  41. [48]

    Nicolas Gisin, Grégoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden. 2002. Quantum cryptography.Reviews of modern physics74, 1 (2002), 145

    2002

  42. [49]

    VS Grigoryan, GS Kanter, E Corndorf, and P Kumar. 2004. Long-haul 10Gb/s encrypted data transmission protected by quantum noise. InProc. ECOC. 121

    2004

  43. [50]

    Grigoryan, Gregory S

    Vladimir S. Grigoryan, Gregory S. Kanter, and Prem Kumar. 2007. Quantum-Noise-Randomized Data Encryption: Comparative Analysis of M-ary PSK and M-ary ASK Protocols for Long-Haul Optical Communications. (2007), 1–3. doi:10.1109/OFC.2007.4348946

    2007

  44. [51]

    Frédéric Grosshans and Philippe Grangier. 2002. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states.Physical Review Letters88, 5 (2002), 057902

    2002

  45. [52]

    Grosshans, G

    F. Grosshans, G. Van Assche, J. Wenger, R. Brouri, N. J. Cerf, and P. Grangier. 2003. Quantum key distribution using Gaussian-modulated coherent states.Nature421 (2003), 238–241

    2003

  46. [53]

    Giulia Guarda, Domenico Ribezzo, Daniela Salvoni, Ciro Bruscino, Pasquale Ercolano, Mikkel Ejrnaes, Loredana Parlato, C Zhang, H Li, L You, et al. 2023. BB84 decoy-state QKD protocol over long-distance optical fiber. In2023 23rd International Conference on Transparent Optical ...

    2023

  47. [54]

    Katsuyoshi Harasawa, Osamu Hirota, Kiichi Yamashita, Makoto Honda, Kenichi Ohhata, Shigeto Akutsu, Takeshi Hosoi, and Yoshifumi Doi. 2011. Quantum Encryption Communication Over a 192-km 2.5-Gbit/s Line With Optical Transceivers Employing Yuen-2000 Protocol Based on Intensity M...

    2011

  48. [55]

    Carl W Helstrom. 1969. Quantum detection and estimation theory.Journal of Statistical Physics1, 2 (1969), 231–252

    1969

  49. [56]

    Osamu Hirota. 2007. Practical security analysis of a quantum stream cipher by the Yuen 2000 protocol.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics76, 3 (2007), 032307

    2007

  50. [57]

    Osamu Hirota, Takehisa Iwakoshi, Masaki Sohma, and Fumio Futami. 2010. Quantum stream cipher beyond the Shannon limit of symmetric key cipher and the possibility of experimental demonstration. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging VIII (Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 7815), ...

    2010 doi

  51. [58]

    Osamu Hirota, Kentaro Kato, Masaki Sohma, Tsuyoshi Sasaki Usuda, and Katsuyoshi Harasawa. 2004. Quantum stream cipher based on optical communications. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging II, Vol. 5551. SPIE, Denver, CO, USA, 206–219

    2004

  52. [59]

    Osamu Hirota, Kenichi Ohhata, Makoto Honda, Shigeto Akutsu, Yoshifumi Doi, Katsuyoshi Harasawa, and Kiichi Yamashita. 2009. Experiments of 10 Gbit/sec quantum stream cipher applicable to optical Ethernet and optical satellite link. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging ...

    2009

  53. [60]

    Osamu Hirota, Tetsuya Shimizu, Takehiko Katayama, and Katsuyoshi Harasawa. 2007. 10 Gbps quantum stream cipher by Y-00 for super HDTV transmission with provable security. InProceedings of SPIE, Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging V (SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 6710), Ronald ...

    2007

  54. [61]

    Osamu Hirota, Masaki Sohma, Masaru Fuse, and Kentaro Kato. 2005. Quantum stream cipher by the Yuen 2000 protocol: Design and experiment by an intensity-modulation scheme.Phys. Rev. A72 (Aug 2005), 022335. Issue 2. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022335

    2005 doi

  55. [62]

    Huang, P

    D. Huang, P. Huang, D. Lin, and G. Zeng. 2016. Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with 1 Mbps secure key rate.Optics Letters41 (2016), 3511–3514

    2016

  56. [63]

    Takehisa Iwakoshi and Osamu Hirota. 2013. Polarity inversion attack prevention by physical properties of Y00 quantum stream cipher. InEmerging Technologies in Security and Defence; and Quantum Security II; and Unmanned Sensor Systems X, Edward M. Carapezza, Keith L. Lewis, Ric...

    2013

  57. [64]

    Thomas Jennewein, Christoph Simon, Gregor Weihs, Harald Weinfurter, and Anton Zeilinger. 2000. Quantum cryptography with entangled photons.Physical review letters84, 20 (2000), 4729

    2000

  58. [65]

    Feiyu Ji, Peng Huang, Tao Wang, Xueqin Jiang, and Guihua Zeng. 2024. Gbps key rate passive-state-preparation continuous-variable quantum key distribution within an access-network area.Photonics Research12, 7 (2024), 1485–1493

    2024

  59. [66]

    Haisong Jiao, Tao Pu, Yukai Chen, and Jilin Zheng. 2020. 100-km Secure Fiber Transmission of ASE-source-based Quantum-Noise Randomized Stream Cipher, In Asia Communications and Photonics Conference/International Conference on Information Photonics and Optical Communications 20...

    2020 doi

  60. [67]

    Haisong Jiao, Tao Pu, Peng Xiang, Jilin Zheng, Tao Fang, and Huatao Zhu. 2017. Physical-layer security analysis of PSK quantum-noise randomized cipher in optically amplified links.Quantum Information Processing16, 8 (2017), 189

    2017

  61. [68]

    Jouguet, S

    P. Jouguet, S. Kunz-Jacques, A. Leverrier, P. Grangier, and E. Diamanti. 2013. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution.Nature Photonics7 (2013), 378–381

    2013

  62. [69]

    Kanter, Eric Corndorf, Chuang Liang, Vladimir S

    Gregory S. Kanter, Eric Corndorf, Chuang Liang, Vladimir S. Grigoryan, and Prem Kumar. 2005. Exploiting quantum and classical noise for securing high-speed optical communication networks. InFluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics III, Philip R. Hemmer, Julio R. ...

    2005 doi

  63. [70]

    Kanter, Daniel Reilly, and Neil Smith

    Gregory S. Kanter, Daniel Reilly, and Neil Smith. 2009. Practical Physical-Layer Encryption: The Marriage of Optical Noise with Traditional Cryptography.IEEE Communications Magazine47, 11 (Nov. 2009), 74–81. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2009.5307469

    2009

  64. [72]

    Kentaro Kato, Fumio Futami, and Ken Tanizawa. 2023. Quantum-enhanced secure-link architecture with quantum stream cipher Y-00 and post-quantum cryptography: basic structure and experiment. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging XXI, Vol. 12692. SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, 62–76

    2023

  65. [73]

    Kentaro Kato and Osamu Hirota. 2008. A quantum stream cipher by Yuen 2000 protocol with nonlinear random number generator. InQuantum Communications and Quantum Imaging VI, Vol. 7092. SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, 91–98

    2008

  66. [74]

    Kleis et al

    S. Kleis et al. 2023. Improved reconciliation for local oscillator continuous-variable quantum key distribution.Physical Review A107 (2023), 012602

    2023

  67. [75]

    Prem Kumar, Eric Corndorf, Gregory Kanter, and Chuang Liang. 2005. Coherent-states based quantum data-encryption through optically-amplified WDM communication networks. US Patent App. 10/982,196

    2005

  68. [76]

    Kanter, and Vladimir S

    Prem Kumar, Eric Corndorf, Chuang Liang, Gregory S. Kanter, and Vladimir S. Grigoryan. 2004. Quantum communications: A practical perspective, In Frontiers in Optics 2004/Laser Science XXII/Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics/Optical Fabrication and Testing.Frontiers in Optics ...

    2004 doi

  69. [77]

    Chao Lei, Jie Zhang, Yajie Li, Yongli Zhao, Kai Wang, Shoudong Liu, Bo Wang, Hang Gao, and Junjia Li. 2021. 16 QAM quantum noise stream cipher coherent transmission over 300 km without intermediate amplifier.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters33, 18 (2021), 1002–1005

    2021

  70. [78]

    Anthony Leverrier and Philippe Grangier. 2009. Unconditional security proof of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution with discrete modulation.Physical review letters102, 18 (2009), 180504

    2009

  71. [79]

    Junjia Li, Yajie Li, Bo Wang, Kai Wang, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2021. Ciphertext mapping method based on gray code in quantum noise stream cipher. In2021 19th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN). IEEE, Qufu, China, 1–3

    2021

  72. [80]

    Yuang Li, Yajie Li, Chao Lei, Kongni Zhu, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2022. I/Q-Combined Encryption and Decryption in Single Carrier QAM Quantum Noise Stream Cipher. In2022 20th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN). IEEE, Shenzhen, China, 1–3

    2022

  73. [81]

    Yuang Li, Yajie Li, Kongni Zhu, Wei Wang, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2023. Analysis of the encryption penalty in a QAM-based quantum noise stream cipher.Optics Express31, 12 (2023), 19006–19020

    2023

  74. [82]

    Kanter, E

    Chuang Liang, G.S. Kanter, E. Corndorf, and P. Kumar. 2005. Quantum noise protected data encryption in a WDM network.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters17, 7 (2005), 1573–1575. doi:10.1109/LPT.2005.848264

    2005

  75. [83]

    Sheng-Kai Liao, Wen-Qi Cai, Wei-Yue Liu, Liang Zhang, Yang Li, Ji-Gang Ren, Juan Yin, Qi Shen, Yuan Cao, Zheng-Ping Li, et al. 2017. Satellite-to- ground quantum key distribution.Nature549, 7670 (2017), 43–47

    2017

  76. [84]

    Yang Liu, Teng-Yun Chen, Jian Wang, Wen-Qi Cai, Xu Wan, Luo-Kan Chen, Jin-Hong Wang, Shu-Bin Liu, Hao Liang, Lin Yang, et al . 2010. Decoy-state quantum key distribution with polarized photons over 200 km.Optics express18, 8 (2010), 8587–8594

    2010

  77. [85]

    Lodewyck, T

    J. Lodewyck, T. Debuisschert, R. Tualle-Brouri, P. Grangier, and F. Grosshans. 2007. Quantum key distribution over 25 km with an all-fiber continuous-variable system.Physical Review A76 (2007), 042305

    2007

  78. [86]

    Yuan Lu, Zhao Jia, Wenchao Dai, and Guihua Zeng. 2012. Experimental study on quantum data stream cipher using homodyne detection. In2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Processing (CSIP). 50–55. doi:10.1109/CSIP.2012.6308793

    2012

  79. [87]

    Marco Lucamarini, KA Patel, JF Dynes, B Fröhlich, AW Sharpe, AR Dixon, ZL Yuan, RV Penty, and AJ Shields. 2013. Efficient decoy-state quantum key distribution with quantified security.Optics express21, 21 (2013), 24550–24565. Manuscript submitted to ACM QKD-Integrated Quantum ...

    2013

  80. [88]

    Hong-Xin Ma, Wan-Su Bao, Hong-Wei Li, and Chun Chou. 2016. Quantum hacking of two-way continuous-variable quantum key distribution using Trojan-horse attack.Chinese Physics B25, 8 (2016), 080309

    2016

  81. [89]

    Wenyan Mao, Guanjun Gao, Cheng Xu, Haidan Liu, Yifan Shen, Jie Zhang, and Yonggang Guo. 2019. Long Distance IM/DD Transmission with OFDM-QAM Based Quantum Noise Stream Cipher. In2019 18th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN). IEEE, Huangshan,...

    2019

  82. [90]

    Joseph Mariamichael, Albert Raj, and Ravi Selvaraj. 2024. Survey on quantum noise stream cipher implemented optical communication systems. Journal of Optical Communications45, s1 (2024), s1201–s1214. doi:10.1515/joc-2022-0057 Received April 10, 2022; accepted January 6, 2023; ...

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    Ryosuke Matsumoto and Takahiro Kodama. 2024. High-Speed Quantum Noise Stream Cipher System Enabled by Optical Fiber-Based Encryption and Low-Complexity Digital Decryption. In2024 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO). IEEE, San Jose, CA, USA, 1–2

    2024

  84. [92]

    Ueli M Maurer and Stefan Wolf. 2000. The diffie–hellman protocol.Designs, Codes and Cryptography19, 2 (2000), 147–171

    2000

  85. [93]

    Miodrag J Mihaljević, Marc PC Fossorier, and Hideki Imai. 2005. Cryptanalysis of keystream generator by decimated sample based algebraic and fast correlation attacks. InInternational Conference on Cryptology in India. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 155–168

    2005

  86. [94]

    Ranjith Nair and Horace P Yuen. 2007. On the Security of the Y-00 (AlphaEta) Direct Encryption Protocol.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0702093(2007)

    2007 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Ranjith Nair, Horace P Yuen, Eric Corndorf, Takami Eguchi, and Prem Kumar. 2006. Quantum-noise randomized ciphers.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics74, 5 (2006), 052309

    2006

  88. [96]

    Comment on:How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?

    Ranjith Nair, Horace P Yuen, Eric Corndorf, and Prem Kumar. 2005. Reply to:’Reply to:" Comment on:How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?"’.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0509092(2005)

    2005 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Masataka Nakazawa. 2015. QAM quantum noise stream cipher transmission with extremely high security. In2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC). IEEE, Valencia, Spain, 1–3

    2015

  90. [98]

    Masataka Nakazawa. 2017. Real-time 70 Gbit/s, 128 QAM quantum noise stream cipher transmission over 100 km with secret keys delivered by continuous variable quantum key, In JSAP-OSA Joint Symposia 2017 Abstracts.JSAP-OSA Joint Symposia 2017 Abstracts, 1–3

    2017

  91. [99]

    Masataka Nakazawa, Masato Yoshida, and Takuya Hirano. 2018. Secure transmission using QAM quantum noise stream cipher with continuous variable QKD. In2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC). IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–3

    2018

  92. [100]

    Masataka Nakazawa, Masato Yoshida, Toshihiko Hirooka, and Keisuke Kasai. 2014. QAM quantum stream cipher using digital coherent optical transmission.Optics express22, 4 (2014), 4098–4107

    2014

  93. [101]

    Masataka Nakazawa, Masato Yoshida, Toshihiko Hirooka, Keisuke Kasai, Takuya Hirano, Tsubasa Ichikawa, and Ryo Namiki. 2017. QAM quantum noise stream cipher transmission over 100 km with continuous variable quantum key distribution.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics53, 4 (2017), 1–16

    2017

  94. [102]

    Miguel Navascués and Antonio Acín. 2005. Security bounds for continuous variables quantum key distribution.Physical review letters94, 2 (2005), 020505

    2005

  95. [103]

    Tsuyoshi Nishioka, Toshio Hasegawa, Hirokazu Ishizuka, Kentaro Imafuku, and Hideki Imai. 2004. How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?Physics Letters A327, 1 (2004), 28–32

    2004

  96. [104]

    Comment on:‘How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?’

    Tsuyoshi Nishioka, Toshio Hasegawa, Hirokazu Ishizuka, Kentaro Imafuku, and Hideki Imai. 2005. Reply to:“Comment on:‘How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?’”[Phys. Lett. A 346 (2005) 1].Physics Letters A346, 1-3 (2005), 7–16

    2005

  97. [105]

    Yaxi Pan, Ling Zhang, and Duan Huang. 2020. Practical security bounds against trojan horse attacks in continuous-variable quantum key distribution.Applied Sciences10, 21 (2020), 7788

    2020

  98. [106]

    Momtchil Peev, Christoph Pacher, Romain Alléaume, Claudio Barreiro, Jan Bouda, Winfried Boxleitner, Thierry Debuisschert, Eleni Diamanti, Mehrdad Dianati, James F Dynes, et al. 2009. The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna.New journal of physics11, 7 (2009), 075001

    2009

  99. [107]

    Woodward, Zhiliang L

    Mirko Pittaluga, Mariella Minder, Marco Lucamarini, Mirko Sanzaro, Robert I. Woodward, Zhiliang L. Yuan, and Andrew J. Shields. 2021. 600-km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilization.Nature Photonics15, 9 (2021), 670–675. doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00811-0

    2021 doi

  100. [108]

    Bing Qi, Lei-Lei Huang, Li Qian, and Hoi-Kwong Lo. 2007. Experimental study on the Gaussian-modulated coherent-state quantum key distribution over standard telecommunication fibers.Phys. Rev. A76 (Nov 2007), 052323. Issue 5. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.052323

    2007 doi

  101. [109]

    Danna Rosenberg, Jim W Harrington, Patrick R Rice, Philip A Hiskett, Charles G Peterson, Richard J Hughes, Adriana E Lita, Sae Woo Nam, and Jane E Nordholt. 2007. Long-distance decoy-state quantum key distribution in optical fiber.Physical review letters98, 1 (2007), 010503

    2007

  102. [110]

    Roumestan et al

    F. Roumestan et al. 2022. Discrete-modulation continuous-variable quantum key distribution with 256-QAM.Optics Express30 (2022), 21331–21344

    2022

  103. [111]

    Masahide Sasaki, Mikio Fujiwara, H Ishizuka, W Klaus, K Wakui, M Takeoka, S Miki, T Yamashita, Z Wang, A Tanaka, et al. 2011. Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network.Optics express19, 11 (2011), 10387–10409

    2011

  104. [112]

    Valerio Scarani, Antonio Acín, Grégoire Ribordy, and Nicolas Gisin. 2004. Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks.Physical Review Letters92, 5 (2004), 057901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.057901

    2004 doi

  105. [113]

    Valerio Scarani, Helle Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Nicolas J Cerf, Miloslav Dušek, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Momtchil Peev. 2009. The security of practical quantum key distribution.Reviews of modern physics81, 3 (2009), 1301–1350

    2009

  106. [114]

    Tobias Schmitt-Manderbach, Henning Weier, Martin Fürst, Rupert Ursin, Felix Tiefenbacher, Thomas Scheidl, Josep Perdigues, Zoran Sodnik, Christian Kurtsiefer, John G Rarity, et al. 2007. Experimental demonstration of free-space decoy-state quantum key distribution over 144 km....

    2007

  107. [115]

    Yawen Shang, Wenyan Mao, Mengxiang Han, Cheng Xu, and Guanjun Gao. 2018. Underwater wireless optical communication with high modulation level based stream cipher. InAsia Communications and Photonics Conference. Optica Publishing Group, Hangzhou, China, Su2A–247

    2018

  108. [116]

    Shuai Shi and Ning Xiao. 2022. 10-Gb/s data transmission using optical physical layer encryption and quantum key distribution.Optics Communications507 (2022), 127603

    2022

  109. [117]

    Tetsuya Shimizu, Osamu Hirota, and Yuki Nagasako. 2008. Running key mapping in a quantum stream cipher by the Yuen 2000 protocol.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics77, 3 (2008), 034305

    2008

  110. [118]

    Peter W Shor. 1994. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. InProceedings 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science. Ieee, 124–134

    1994

  111. [119]

    Siegenthaler. 1985. Decrypting a class of stream ciphers using ciphertext only.IEEE Transactions on computers100, 1 (1985), 81–85

    1985

  112. [120]

    2005.Cryptography: theory and practice

    Douglas R Stinson. 2005.Cryptography: theory and practice. Chapman and Hall/CRC

    2005

  113. [121]

    Jihui Sun, Lin Jiang, Xingehen He, Anlin Yi, Wei Pan, Bin Luo, and Lianshan Yan. 2024. Field Trial of 90.81Tbit/s C+ L-Band Quantum Noise Stream Cipher Coherent Transmission Over 112km of Deployed Commercial Fiber. In2024 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP) and ...

    2024

  114. [122]

    Jihui Sun, Lin Jiang, Anlin Yi, Jiacheng Feng, Xiong Deng, Wei Pan, Bin Luo, and Lianshan Yan. 2023. Experimental demonstration of 201.6-Gbit/s coherent probabilistic shaping QAM transmission with quantum noise stream cipher over a 1200-km standard single mode fiber.Optics Exp...

    2023

  115. [123]

    Yan-Lin Tang, Hua-Lei Yin, Si-Jing Chen, Yang Liu, Wei-Jun Zhang, Xiao Jiang, Lu Zhang, Jian Wang, Li-Xing You, Jian-Yu Guan, et al . 2014. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over 200 km.Physical review letters113, 19 (2014), 190501

    2014

  116. [124]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2018. 214 Intensity-Level 10-Gbaud Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher Enabled by Coarse-to-Fine Modulation.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters30, 22 (Nov. 2018), 1987–1990

    2018

  117. [125]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2018. Digital Coherent Detection with Decryption in PSK Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher. InThe 23rd OptoElectronics and Communications Conference (OECC 2018) Technical Digest. Optica Publishing Group, Jeju, Korea

    2018

  118. [126]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2018. Tradeoffs between quantum noise masking and transmission Reach in PSK Y-00 quantum stream cipher. Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Res Inst Bull8 (2018), 9–12

    2018

  119. [127]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2019. Digital coherent 20-Gbit/s DP-PSK Y-00 quantum stream cipher transmission over 800-km SSMF. In2019 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–3

    2019

  120. [128]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2019. Digital coherent PSK Y-00 quantum stream cipher with2 17 randomized phase levels.Optics Express27, 2 (2019), 1071–1079

    2019

  121. [129]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2019. Practical Design Consideration of PSK Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher Based on M-ary Data Modulation. Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Research Institute Bulletin9, 1 (2019), 49–52

    2019

  122. [130]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2019. Single-channel 48-Gbit/s DP PSK Y-00 quantum stream cipher transmission over 400-and 800-km SSMF. Optics express27, 18 (2019), 25357–25363

    2019

  123. [131]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2020. Quantum-Noise Signal Masking at Microwave Frequency in PSK Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher System with Optical Heterodyne.Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Research Institute Bulletin10, 1 (2020), 9–12

    2020

  124. [132]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2021. Quantum-Noise Signal Masking of OFDM PSK/QAM Quantum-Noise Randomized Ciphers in IM/DD IF-over-Fiber Systems.Tamagawa University Quantum ICT Research Institute Bulletin11, 1 (2021), 1–5

    2021

  125. [133]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2021. Ultra-long-haul digital coherent PSK Y-00 quantum stream cipher transmission system.Optics Express29, 7 (2021), 10451–10464

    2021

  126. [134]

    Ken Tanizawa and Fumio Futami. 2023. Tradeoff Between Reach and Security in Nyquist WDM Transmission of PSK Y-00 Quantum Stream Cipher. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters35, 21 (2023), 1147–1150

    2023

  127. [135]

    Wang et al

    C. Wang et al. 2023. Long-distance discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with improved security.Optics Letters48 (2023), 1567–1570

    2023

  128. [136]

    C. Wang, D. Huang, P. Huang, and G. Zeng. 2022. High-rate discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution.Physical Review A 105 (2022), 012412

    2022

  129. [137]

    Chao Wang, Xiao-Tian Song, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Shuang Wang, Wei Chen, Chun-Mei Zhang, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han. 2015. Phase- reference-free experiment of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution.Physical review letters115, 16 (2015), 160502

    2015

  130. [138]

    Kai Wang, Yajie Li, Xiaokun Yang, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2018. Ciphertext mapping method based on bitwise not operation in quantum noise stream cipher. InAsia Communications and Photonics Conference. Optica Publishing Group, Hangzhou, China, M2D–2

    2018

  131. [139]

    Kai Wang, Yajie Li, Huibin Zhang, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2020. Theory and performance analyses in quantum stream cipher based on bitwise NOT operation.Optical Fiber Technology55 (2020), 102157

    2020

  132. [140]

    Kai Wang, Yajie Li, Yongli Zhao, Hao Yu, Zhenwei Li, and Jie Zhang. 2019. A multi-ring BPSK mapping in quantum noise stream cipher. In2019 24th OptoElectronics and Communications Conference (OECC) and 2019 International Conference on Photonics in Switching and Computing (PSC)....

    2019

  133. [141]

    Kai Wang and Jie Zhang. 2021. The security of quantum noise stream cipher against collective attacks.Quantum Information Processing20, 7 (2021), 241. Manuscript submitted to ACM QKD-Integrated Quantum Noise Stream Cipher: An Overview 29

    2021

  134. [142]

    Kai Wang, Jie Zhang, Yajie Li, Yongli Zhao, and Huibin Zhang. 2019. Multi-bit mapping based on constellation rotation in Quantum Noise Stream Cipher.Optics Communications446 (2019), 147–155

    2019

  135. [143]

    Yang Wang, Hu Li, Mengfan Cheng, Deming Liu, and Lei Deng. 2021. Experimental demonstration of secure 100 Gb/s IMDD transmission over a 50 km SSMF using a quantum noise stream cipher and optical coarse-to-fine modulation.Optics Express29, 4 (2021), 5475–5486

    2021

  136. [144]

    Christian Weedbrook, Stefano Pirandola, Raúl García-Patrón, Nicolas J Cerf, Timothy C Ralph, Jeffrey H Shapiro, and Seth Lloyd. 2012. Gaussian quantum information.Reviews of modern physics84, 2 (2012), 621–669

    2012

  137. [145]

    Mark N Wegman and J Lawrence Carter. 1981. New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality.Journal of computer and system sciences22, 3 (1981), 265–279

    1981

  138. [146]

    Kejin Wei, Wei Li, Hao Tan, Yang Li, Hao Min, Wei-Jun Zhang, Hao Li, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Xiao Jiang, et al. 2020. High-speed measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics.Physical Review X10, 3 (2020), 031030

    2020

  139. [147]

    Reinhard F Werner and Terry Farrelly. 2019. Uncertainty from Heisenberg to today.Foundations of Physics49, 6 (2019), 460–491

    2019

  140. [148]

    Winzer, David T

    Peter J. Winzer, David T. Neilson, and Andrew R. Chraplyvy. 2018. Fiber-optic transmission and networking: the previous 20 and the next 20 years (Invited).Opt. Express26, 18 (Sep 2018), 24190–24239. doi:10.1364/OE.26.024190

    2018 doi

  141. [149]

    William K Wootters and Wojciech H Zurek. 2009. The no-cloning theorem.Physics Today62, 2 (2009), 76–77

    2009

  142. [150]

    Mingze Wu, Yan Pan, Junhui Li, Heng Wang, Lu Fan, Yun Shao, Yang Li, Wei Huang, Song Yu, Bingjie Xu, et al. 2025. High-rate discrete-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with composable security.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11431(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Ning Xiao, Shuai Shi, Hong Ouyang, and Hua Yang. 2023. Physical-layer security analysis of a quantum noise randomized cipher assisted by chaos masking.Optical Fiber Technology78 (2023), 103330

    2023

  144. [152]

    Yunhao Xie, Xianran Huang, Guozhi Xu, Junzhe Xiao, Mengyue Shi, Weisheng Hu, and Lilin Yi. 2025. Implementation of 400 Gbps quantum noise stream cipher encryption for 1520 km fiber transmission using end-to-end deep learning.Optics Letters50, 12 (2025), 3808–3811

    2025

  145. [153]

    Juan Yin, Yu-Huai Li, Sheng-Kai Liao, Meng Yang, Yuan Cao, Liang Zhang, Ji-Gang Ren, Wen-Qi Cai, Wei-Yue Liu, Shuang-Lin Li, et al. 2020. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres.Nature582, 7813 (2020), 501–505

    2020

  146. [154]

    Zhen-Qiang Yin, Zheng-Fu Han, Wei Chen, Fang-Xing Xu, Qing-Lin Wu, and Guang-Can Guo. 2007. Experimental decoy quantum key distribution up to 130km fiber.arXiv preprint arXiv:0704.294125 (2007), 3547

    2007

  147. [155]

    Masato Yoshida, Toshihiko Hirooka, Keisuke Kasai, and Masataka Nakazawa. 2014. Adaptive 4–64 QAM real-time coherent optical transmission over 320 km with FPGA-based transmitter and receiver.Optics Express22, 13 (2014), 16520–16527. doi:10.1364/OE.22.016520

    2014 doi

  148. [156]

    Masato Yoshida, Takuya Hirooka, Keisuke Kasai, and Masataka Nakazawa. 2015. QAM Quantum Noise Stream Cipher Using Digital Coherent Optical Transmission. InProceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. IEEE, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1007–1011

    2015

  149. [157]

    Masato Yoshida, Toshihiko Hirooka, Keisuke Kasai, and Masataka Nakazawa. 2015. Real-time 10 Gbit/s-16 QAM Quantum Stream Cipher Transmission over 320 km with FPGA-based Transmitter and Receiver, In Optical Fiber Communication Conference.Optical Fiber Communication Conference, ...

    2015 doi

  150. [158]

    Masato Yoshida, Toshihiko Hirooka, Keisuke Kasai, and Masataka Nakazawa. 2015. Real-time Adaptive 4–64 QAM, 20–60 Gbit/s Quantum Noise Stream Cipher Transmission over 320 km with FPGA-based Transmitter and Receiver. InProceedings of the European Conference on Optical Communica...

    2015

  151. [159]

    Masato Yoshida, Toshihiko Hirooka, Keisuke Kasai, and Masataka Nakazawa. 2016. Single-channel 40 Gbit/s digital coherent QAM quantum noise stream cipher transmission over 480 km.Optics express24, 1 (2016), 652–661

    2016

  152. [160]

    Masato Yoshida, Takashi Kan, Keisuke Kasai, Toshihiko Hirooka, and Masataka Nakazawa. 2020. 10 Tbit/s QAM Quantum Noise Stream Cipher Coherent Transmission over 160 km. In2020 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). 1–3

    2020

  153. [161]

    Quan Yu, Yang Wang, Di Li, Haiping Song, Yudi Fu, Xingxing Jiang, Linbojie Huang, Mengfan Cheng, Deming Liu, and Lei Deng. 2020. Secure 100 Gb/s IMDD Transmission Over 100 km SSMF Enabled by Quantum Noise Stream Cipher and Sparse RLS-Volterra Equalizer.IEEE Access8 (2020), 635...

    2020

  154. [162]

    Horace Yuen, Eric Corndorf, Geraldo Barbosa, and Prem Kumar. 2005. Barbosa et al. Reply:.Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (Feb 2005), 048902. Issue 4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.048902

    2005 doi

  155. [163]

    H. P. Yuen. 2003. KCQ: A new approach to quantum cryptography.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics9, 6 (2003), 1630–1645

    2003

  156. [164]

    Horace P Yuen, Prem Kumar, Eric Corndorf, and Ranjith Nair. 2005. Comment on:‘How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?’[Phys. Lett. A 327 (2004) 28].Physics Letters A346, 1-3 (2005), 1–6

    2005

  157. [165]

    Yuen and Ranjith Nair

    Horace P. Yuen and Ranjith Nair. 2007. On the Security of Y-00 Under Fast Correlation and Other Attacks on the Key.Physics Letters A364, 2 (Jan. 2007), 112–116

    2007

  158. [166]

    Horace P Yuen, Ranjith Nair, Eric Corndorf, Gregory S Kanter, and Prem Kumar. 2005. On the security of AlphaEta: Response toSome attacks on quantum-based cryptographic protocols’.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0509091(2005)

    2005 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Mingrui Zhang, Yajie Li, Haokun Song, Kongni Zhu, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2022. Security analysis of a QAM modulated quantum noise stream cipher under a correlation attack.Optics express30, 22 (2022), 40645–40656

    2022

  160. [168]

    Mingrui Zhang, Yajie Li, Shuang Wei, Haokun Song, Yixin Wang, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2024. Quantum noise stream cipher scheme based on 3-Channel-QAM with 3D mapping and DFTs-OFDM.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters37, 3 (2024), 141–144

    2024

  161. [169]

    Yichen Zhang, Zhengyu Li, Ziyang Chen, Christian Weedbrook, Yijia Zhao, Xiangyu Wang, Yundi Huang, Chunchao Xu, Xiaoxiong Zhang, Zhenya Wang, et al. 2019. Continuous-variable QKD over 50 km commercial fiber.Quantum Science and Technology4, 3 (2019), 035006. Manuscript submitte...

    2019

  162. [170]

    Zhang, Z

    Y. Zhang, Z. Li, S. Yu, Y. Guo, W. Gu, and H. Guo. 2020. Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 202 km.Physical Review Letters125 (2020), 010502

    2020

  163. [171]

    Zihao Zhang, Yanwen Zhu, Xun Zhou, Xiaogang Wang, Yixin Wang, and Jie Zhang. 2025. End-to-End Modeling of FSO Communication Systems with QNSC Encryption under Different Turbulence Conditions. In2025 23rd International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN). ...

    2025

  164. [172]

    Yi Zhao, Bing Qi, Xiongfeng Ma, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Li Qian. 2006. Experimental quantum key distribution with decoy states.Physical review letters96, 7 (2006), 070502

    2006

  165. [173]

    Xin Zhou and Xiaofei Tang. 2011. Research and implementation of RSA algorithm for encryption and decryption. InProceedings of 2011 6th international forum on strategic technology, Vol. 2. Harbin, China, 1118–1121

    2011

  166. [174]

    Dongxu Zhu, Bo Liu, Jianxin Ren, Shuaidong Chen, Yaya Mao, Xiumin Song, Jianye Zhao, Lilong Zhao, Xue Tang, Mengtong Yin, et al . 2025. Odd-order quantum noise-like stream cipher scheme based on joint index modulation constellation shaping.Optics Express33, 7 (2025), 16065–16081

    2025

  167. [175]

    Huatao Zhu, Zhanqi Liu, Shuwen Chen, Xiangming Xu, and Feiyu Li. 2023. Optical stealth communication based on quantum noise stream ciphered amplified spontaneous emission light.Optics Express31, 3 (2023), 3595–3605

    2023

  168. [176]

    Huatao Zhu, Zhanqi Liu, Peng Xiang, Shuwen Chen, Feiyu Li, and Xiangming Xu. 2022. Quantum noise ciphered optical stealth communication based on equivalent spectral encoding.Optics express30, 21 (2022), 38128–38138

    2022

  169. [177]

    Kongni Zhu, Shuang Wei, Yuang Li, Yajie Li, Yixin Wang, Yongli Zhao, and Jie Zhang. 2023. Quantum noise stream cipher scheme with triangular quadrature amplitude modulation and secret probabilistic shaping.Journal of Lightwave Technology42, 5 (2023), 1423–1433. Manuscript subm...

    2023

  170. [2010]

    InOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2010 (OSA Technical Digest (CD))

    360 km Field Transmission of 10 Gbit/s Stream Cipher by Quantum Noise for Optical Network. InOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2010 (OSA Technical Digest (CD)). Optica Publishing Group, San Diego, CA, USA. doi:10.1364/OFC.2010.OWC4

    2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.