Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Computational Study of Water Adsorption and Dissociative Mechanisms Impacting g-C3N4's Optical and Electronic Properties

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Water striking a g-C3N4 nanosheet dissociates mostly into atomic oxygen and hydrogen, and the resulting oxygen-derived fragments narrow the band gap and enhance optical absorption and electrical response.

desk verdict The paper's headline claim—that H2O dissociation enhances conductance and absorbance—is contradicted by its own transport data, and no calculation for the dissociated species is presented. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26667 v1 pith:YIUV2MCA submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Amil Aligayev , Ulkar Jabbarli , F. Javier Dom{i}nguez-Gutierrez , Ulkar Samadova , Jialin Li , Stefanos Papanikolaou , Qing Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords watersplittingg-C3N4nanosheetsphotocatalysisdensityfunctionaltheorytight-bindingsimulationsreactiveforcefieldopticalabsorptionelectrontransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that water is an active participant in the function of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), not merely a molecule sitting on its surface. Using a three-layer simulation strategy—a reference quantum-mechanical treatment, a faster tight-binding approximation, and a reactive force field that allows bonds to break—the authors argue that when H2O hits the sheet with enough kinetic energy it splits predominantly into an oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms, with smaller fractions becoming OH+H or H2+O. They further claim that the oxygen-derived electronic states narrow the band gap from about 2.6 eV toward 2.5 eV, induce spin polarization, and enhance the nanosheet's optical absorption and electrical response relative to the pristine state. A sympathetic reader would care because this would make g-C3N4—a cheap, metal-free, visible-light-absorbing semiconductor—a more credible platform for solar-driven hydrogen production, and it would mean the splitting reaction itself rewires the material's optoelectronic properties.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the g-C3N4 monolayer itself—a tri-s-triazine-based, graphene-like 2D semiconductor with an indirect band gap the authors compute at about 2.6 eV. The mechanism that carries the argument is the oxygen-induced electronic state: when water fragments bind to the sheet, oxygen-derived states appear near the Fermi level, which accounts for the narrowed band gap, spin polarization, and altered optical absorption. The interpretive machinery has three layers: density functional theory as the reference electronic-structure benchmark; self-consistent-charge tight-binding, a cheaper electronic-structure approximation, used for the optical-absorption, density-of-states, and tra

What would settle it

Recompute the minimum-energy water adsorption site, the ~2.4 Å equilibrium distance, and the dissociation barrier to O+H+H on the same g-C3N4 geometry with a higher-level reference method (for instance, a hybrid density-functional or many-body approach) and compare against the approximate models: disagreement by more than a few tenths of an electronvolt in barrier or binding energy would invalidate the branching ratios and the predicted property changes. On the experimental side, a clean g-C3N4 film exposed to water under controlled impact should show the predicted ~0.1 eV band-gap narrowing a

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own account, the central discovery is dissociation-controlled optoelectronics. A water molecule approaching the tri-s-triazine-based monolayer physisorbs at about 2.4 Å above the surface in a 'down' configuration (hydrogen atoms toward the sheet); under a 5 eV impact it breaks apart, with 78% of trajectories giving O+H+H, 12.7% giving OH+H, 6.5% giving H2+O, and only 2.8% staying intact. The fragments—especially oxygen atoms—insert electronic states near the Fermi level, which the authors identify as the cause of the observed band-gap narrowing, the appearance of spin-polarized density of states, a stronger optical absorbance in the visible range, and a measurable change in el

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the faster, cheaper simulation layers stay as accurate as the full quantum-mechanical reference method for water adsorption and dissociation on g-C3N4; the only quantitative cross-check reported is a band-gap match, not adsorption energies, dissociation barriers, or the claimed optical and transport changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, water adsorption is not a passive environmental effect: the same molecules that supply hydrogen also modify the catalyst's band gap and light response, so photocatalytic performance and surface wetting are coupled.
  • The dissociation statistics (mostly O+H+H at 5 eV) imply that under sufficiently energetic impact, g-C3N4 can produce atomic hydrogen directly from water; on the surface, this is the step that can recombine into H2 fuel.
  • A roughly 0.1 eV band-gap narrowing on water adsorption means the optical absorption edge shifts further into the visible; the paper predicts measurable changes in absorbance and current response that experiments on g-C3N4 under water vapor could look for.
  • The transport calculation shows intact water molecules decrease current through a g-C3N4 ribbon while hydrogen has a smaller effect; therefore any conductance enhancement claimed for dissociation must come from the fragment-attached system, not the physisorbed molecule.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if oxygen fragments are truly the active electronic modifier, then deliberate oxygen doping (for example, partial oxidation or oxygen plasma treatment) could mimic the water-splitting benefit on demand, a route the paper does not pursue.
  • Editorial extension: the 5 eV impact energy is far above thermal energies, and the paper notes that at lower energy the dominant channel shifts toward OH+H; a natural extension is to map dissociation branching as a function of impact energy and compare with solar-driven conditions.
  • Editorial extension: the paper's abstract and its transport section disagree about whether conductance rises or falls with water present. A testable resolution is to compute the transmission of the dissociated O+H+H system explicitly, which would tell whether the enhanced-conductance claim is about fragments rather than intact water.
  • Editorial extension: the same multiscale collision protocol could be applied to other 2D photocatalysts, such as nanoporous carbon-nitride polymorphs, to see whether the tri-s-triazine pore geometry or the nitrogen lone pairs are what drives O+H+H dominance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines DFT, SCC-DFTB, and ReaxFF simulations to study the interaction of H2O with a g-C3N4 nanosheet: physisorption curves, DOS, optical absorption, electron transport, chemical descriptors, and MD dissociation probabilities. The abstract's central claim is that dissociation of H2O into HO and O significantly enhances both optical absorbance and conductance of the nanosheet relative to the pristine state. The paper also reports a DFT/DFTB band gap of 2.61/2.68 eV, adsorption geometries at selected sites, transport sensitivities for H2 and H2O, and a 5 eV molecular-beam MD simulation giving mostly O+H+H dissociation products.

Significance. If established, the claimed enhancement of optical absorption and conductance upon water dissociation would be of interest for g-C3N4 photocatalysis. The paper does contain useful cross-method comparisons: DFT, SCC-DFTB, and ReaxFF physisorption curves are broadly consistent, and the DFT/DFTB band-gap match provides a reasonable baseline. However, the central claim is not supported by any calculation presented in the manuscript, and one of the paper's own transport results directly contradicts it. The methodological skeleton is promising, but the headline result would require new, targeted calculations on the dissociated configurations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §5–§6] The abstract states that dissociation of H2O into HO and O significantly enhances optical absorbance and conductance. No calculation links the dissociated products (O+H+H, OH+H, H2+O) obtained in §5 to optical or transport properties. Fig. 7 reports absorbance only for pristine, H2, and H2O-adsorbed systems; Fig. 12 and its inset show that adsorbed H2O decreases the current; and §6 itself concludes that H2O leads to a slight decrease in conductance. The central claim is therefore contradicted by the manuscript's own results and would require substantial new simulations, not a revision of the text.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (6)] The sensitivity S is defined with I_g as 'the current of the pristine and Ni-doped graphene [48]', not pristine g-C3N4. The numbers quoted (0.38% for H2, 0.70% for H2O) are therefore not a clean measure of the effect of the adsorbate on g-C3N4. Moreover, the I–V curves used to support the 'enhanced conductance' claim are only shown qualitatively in the inset; no current values or statistical uncertainty are given. This is load-bearing because the abstract's conductance claim rests on this figure.
  3. [§4.2] The Mott-Wannier exciton parameters are physically inconsistent: Eb = 367 eV with Re = 2.88 (units not stated) is absurd for g-C3N4, whose optical gap and band gap differ by at most a few eV. The inputs m*_e = 0.4, m*_h = 1.4, and εr are not derived or tabulated, so the result is not reproducible. Additionally, the listed electronegativities have the wrong sign (χ is reported as −0.8874 eV, −3.1020 eV, −3.0747 eV, although χ = −µ by the paper's own definitions), and the unit-cell HOMO/LUMO gap, 1.2242 eV, is inconsistent with the reported DFT band gap of 2.61 eV. These issues undermine the 'photocatalytic efficiency parameters' and should be corrected or removed.
  4. [§2.3 and §5] The reported lattice parameter a = b = 0.715 Å is a factor of ten smaller than the expected g-C3N4 lattice constant (~7.1 Å); if this is a decimal-unit error, it must be fixed because all supercell areas, adsorption distances, and transport geometries depend on it. In addition, the ReaxFF parameter set and the SCC-DFTB Slater-Koster files for the water/g-C3N4 system are not identified beyond 'mio', and no validation is given for dissociation barriers or product branching ratios against DFT. The MD study also uses 5 eV hyperthermal molecular-beam impacts, which are not shown to represent photocatalytic water-splitting conditions; this weakens the relevance of the dissociation probabilities in §5 to the abstract's photocatalytic claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains 'donw' and 'minium'; also 'adsorbance' is used where 'absorbance/absorption' is meant in several places. These typos should be corrected.
  2. [§4.1, Fig. 10] The switch from the periodic band gap (2.67 eV) to the ribbon DOS band gap (3.5 eV) is not explained. A sentence on finite-size/edge effects would clarify the apparent discrepancy.
  3. [§4.2, Fig. 13] The RDG discussion is qualitative and does not quantify the 'enhanced strong interactions' claimed for the H2O-adsorbed system. A quantitative integration or reference to the RDG isosurface would strengthen the statement.
  4. [§5] The molecular-dynamics results are presented as percentages (78% O+H+H, 12.7% OH+H, 6.5% H2+O) without error bars or trajectory-to-trajectory variation; given that 1000 trajectories were run, a confidence interval would be appropriate and inexpensive to add.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation chain contains no fitted input renamed as a prediction, and the self-citations are methodological rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction or by self-citation. The DFT, SCC-DFTB, and ReaxFF calculations are used as independent methods: the DFT band gap (2.61 eV) and DFTB band gap (2.68 eV) are checked against experimental values and are not fitted to the headline result. Equations (1)-(3) are standard energy decompositions and the binding-energy definition, not circular reductions. Equation (6) defines a sensitivity metric rather than predicting a fitted quantity; the baseline I_g from the authors' prior graphene study [48] is a normalization choice, and the resulting 0.38%/0.70% numbers are outputs of the definition, not inputs. The self-citations [48,50,75] are methodological precedents for using SCC-DFTB and ReaxFF, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from them. The exciton parameters m*_e and m*_h are unexplained inputs, but unexplained inputs are not the same as circularity. The main concern with this paper is that the abstract's claim that H2O dissociation into HO and O enhances absorbance and conductance is not supported by the presented optical/transport calculations and is contradicted by the concluding statement that H2O decreases conductance; this is a correctness/evidence gap, not a definitional or self-citational circularity. The paper is not circular within the meaning of the requested analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters of its own; its results depend on hand-set simulation conditions (5 eV impact), literature force-field parameters treated as trusted, and unexplained effective-mass inputs. The key unsupported leap is equating hyperthermal beam dissociation with photocatalytic water splitting.

free parameters (3)
  • H2O impact energy = 5 eV
    Chosen impact energy for molecular-beam MD; authors note the dissociation pathway shifts if this energy is decreased, so branching ratios are conditional on this hand-set value.
  • Electron effective mass m*_e = 0.4 m_e
    Input to Mott-Wannier exciton model; no derivation provided in the paper.
  • Hole effective mass m*_h = 1.4 m_e
    Input to Mott-Wannier exciton model; no derivation provided.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption PBE+DFT-D3 provides accurate ground-state energetics for g-C3N4 and water
    Used for all DFT benchmarks in §2; no hybrid/GW or experimental cross-check for adsorption energies.
  • domain assumption SCC-DFTB with mio SK parameters reproduces DFT-level C/N/H/O interactions
    Invoked in §2.1; validated only by band-gap agreement in Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption ReaxFF force field (parameter set not identified) reproduces water dissociation on g-C3N4
    Used in §5; consistency with SCC-DFTB is claimed via unreferenced supplementary material.
  • domain assumption Mott-Wannier exciton model applies to this 2D monolayer
    Used in §4.2 to compute Eb, Re; no assessment of dielectric screening or 2D exciton corrections.
  • ad hoc to paper Hyperthermal 5 eV molecular beam collisions represent photocatalytic water splitting conditions
    No justification that photogenerated carriers produce 5 eV water impacts; authors acknowledge lower energies change the dominant pathway.
  • domain assumption NEGF-DFTB transport on a finite ribbon with 1.0 V bias is representative of the periodic nanosheet's conductance
    Transport uses a ribbon geometry (Fig. 9) with a 3.5 eV band gap differing from the periodic 2.67 eV; the ribbon results are then generalized to the sheet.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Computational Study of Water Adsorption and Dissociative Mechanisms Impacting g-C3N4's Optical and Electronic Properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YIUV2MCA

@misc{pith2026260726667,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Computational Study of Water Adsorption and Dissociative Mechanisms Impacting g-C3N4's Optical and Electronic Properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YIUV2MCA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26667}
}
read the original abstract

In the quest for sustainable energy solutions, water splitting emerges as a crucial process for generating clean hydrogen a versatile and renewable fuel essential for energy storage, emissions reduction, and achieving sustainability goals. This study employs a comprehensive computational approach, utilizing atomistic simulations to systematically investigate the effects of water absorption on the electronic and optical properties of g-C3N4 nanosheets. Our methodology integrates ab initio computations grounded in density functional theory (DFT), which allows for a detailed characterization of the nanosheet and serves as a benchmark for self-consistent charge density functional tight binding (SCC-DFTB) simulations. This approach provides valuable insights into the behavior of the nanosheet under the influence of absorbed OH and H2O molecules by considering calculated parameters for photocatalytic efficiency. Additionally, we extend our investigation to classical molecular dynamics simulations within the ReaxFF framework, modeling the emission of multiple H2O molecules and assessing the subsequent rate of H2 evolution. A key finding of our study reveals that the dissociation of H2O into HO and O molecules significantly enhances both the optical absorbance and conductance of the nanosheet compared to its pristine state. These results underscore the potential of g-C3N4 nanosheets as effective materials for water splitting applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26667 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The optimized structure consists of six carbon atoms and eight nitrogen atoms. In the DFT com￾putations, the total energy difference criterion in the self–consistent field loop was set to 10−6 eV, while ge￾ometry optimizations were terminated when the force on each atom fell below 0.01 eV/Å. In addition, a Monkhorst–Pack grid [57] of 15×15×1 is utilized for Brillouin zone sampling. For the SCC-DFTB calcu￾lations, th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Band structure calculated using DFT and DFTB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Physisorption pathways of the hydrogen molecule [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Physisorption pathways of the water molecule on g [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optimized structures of g–C3N4 using DFT, SCC– DFTB, and reaxFF approaches. The calculated bond lengths and lattice parameters are in good agreement with the reported DFT results [59]. in a plane parallel to the 2D material. This discrep￾ancy highlights the limitations…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Density of States (DOS) for pristine g-C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Color online) Optical absorbance of g-C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Geometric Configuration of g-C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of electron transmission probability for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sensitivity of the g-C3N4 sheet compared to ad￾sorbed hydrogen and water molecules as a function of applied voltage. The inset shows the typical current–voltage (I–V) plot for each system, highlighting that the presence of a wa￾ter molecule decreases the current in th…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: a) Reduced Density Gradient of the unit cell of g-C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: a) Histogram shows the position of H and O atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Aligayev, F

    A. Aligayev, F. Dominguez-Gutierrez, M. Chourashiya, S. Papanikolaou, Q. Huang, Computational modeling of ch4 and co2 adsorp- tion on monolayer graphenylene: Implications for optoelectronic properties and hydrogen production, Diamond and Related Materials (2024) 111336

    2024

  2. [1]

    X. Wang, J. You, J. Ren, Y. Xue, J. Tian, H. Zhang, Heterointerface and crystallinity en- gineering of ru/rus2 dual co-catalysts for en- hanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, Ap- plied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 345 (2024) 123722

    2024

  3. [2]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Ran, H. Fu, y. Gong, S. Li, F. Gu, S. Wang, X. An, D. Su, X. Yang, Band align- ment tunning via the facets of cds nanocrystals with g-c3n4 for unveiling their enhanced photo- catalytical property, Advanced Functional Mate- rials 2404585

  4. [3]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Zhu, C. Xie, P. Yang, Verti- cally implanting mose2 nanosheets on superior thin c-doped g-c3n4 nanosheets towards interface-enhanced electrochemical activities, Carbon 220 (2024) 118884.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2024.118884. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0008622324001015

    arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    C. Li, Y. Tian, S. Wang, P. Yang, X. Zhang, Ag2se nanoparticles anchored on s-g-c3n4 nanosheets towards efficient photocatalytic tetracycline hydrochloride removal and h2 generation, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 12 (5) (2024) 114170.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.114170. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S221...

    arXiv 2024

  6. [5]

    D. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Song, P. Yang, Effect of precursors on cu particle distribution in g-c3n4 nanosheets towards efficient photocatalytic degradation and h2 generation, International Journal of Hydro- gen Energy 68 (2024) 463–471.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.198. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0360319...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.198 2024

  7. [6]

    Algara-Siller, N

    G. Algara-Siller, N. Severin, S. Y. Chong, T. Björkman, R. G. Palgrave, A. Laybourn, M. Antonietti, Y. Z. Khimyak, A. V. Krashenin- nikov, J. P. Rabe, U. Kaiser, A. I. Cooper, A. Thomas, M. J. Bojdys, Triazine-based graphitic carbon nitride: a two-dimensional semiconductor, Angewandte Chemie Interna- tional Edition 53 (29) 7450–7455.doi:https: //doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.201402191

  8. [7]

    P. Ma, X. Zhang, C. Wang, Z. Wang, K. Wang, Y. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Zhai, J. Deng, L. Wang, et al., Band alignment of homojunction by an- choring cn quantum dots on g-c3n4 (0d/2d) en- hance photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide evolu- tion, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 300 (2022) 120736

    2022

Show all 75 references
  1. [8]

    X. Wang, X. Wang, W. Tian, A. Meng, Z. Li, S. Li, L. Wang, G. Li, High-energy ball-milling constructing p-doped g-c3n4/mop heterojunc- tion with mon bond bridged interface and schot- tky barrier for enhanced photocatalytic h2 evo- lution, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 303...

    2022

  2. [9]

    Humayun, H

    M. Humayun, H. Ullah, C. Hu, M. Tian, W. Pi, Y. Zhang, W. Luo, C. Wang, Enhanced photo- catalytic h2 evolution performance of the type- ii fetppcl/porous g-c3n4 heterojunction: exper- imental and density functional theory studies, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (11) (20...

    2023

  3. [10]

    Mehtab, Y

    A. Mehtab, Y. Mao, S. M. Alshehri, T. Ah- mad, Photo/electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using type-ii cu2o/g-c3n4 heterostructure: Den- sity functional theory addresses the improved charge transport efficiency, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 652 (2023) 1467–1480

    2023

  4. [11]

    Wu, L.-M

    H.-Z. Wu, L.-M. Liu, S.-J. Zhao, The effect of water on the structural, electronic and photo- catalytic properties of graphitic carbon nitride, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 16 (7) (2014) 3299–3304

    2014

  5. [12]

    J. Ma, A. Michaelides, D. Alfe, L. Schimka, G. Kresse, E. Wang, Adsorption and diffusion of water on graphene from first principles, Physical Review B 84 (3) (2011) 033402

    2011

  6. [13]

    L.-M. Liu, A. Laio, A. Michaelides, Initial stages of salt crystal dissolution determined with ab 13 initio molecular dynamics, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 13 (29) (2011) 13162–13166

    2011

  7. [14]

    W. Shi, X. Zhang, Y. Tian, P. Yang, Aqueous glass-coated cspbi3 quantum dots implanted in g-c3n4 nanosheets for efficient photocat- alytic water splitting and h2o2 generation, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engi- neering 12 (5) (2024) 114018.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.j...

    2024

  8. [15]

    Mortazavi, F

    B. Mortazavi, F. Shojaei, M. Shahrokhi, M. Azizi, T. Rabczuk, A. V. Shapeev, X. Zhuang, Nanoporous c3n4, c3n5 and c3n6 nanosheets; novel strong semicon- ductors with low thermal conductivities and appealing optical/electronic proper- ties, Carbon 167 (2020) 40–50.doi:https: //...

    2020 doi

  9. [16]

    P. Song, X. Zhang, B. Wang, P. Yang, Moc nanoparticles embedded in superior thin g-c3n4 nanosheets for efficient pho- tocatalytic activity, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering As- pects 702 (2024) 135132.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135132....

    2024

  10. [17]

    Zhong, J

    Y. Zhong, J. Zi, F. Wu, Z. Li, X. Luan, F. Gao, Z. Lian, Defect-mediated electron transfer in pt- cuins2/cds heterostructured nanocrystals for en- hanced photocatalytic h2 evolution, ACS Ap- plied Nano Materials 5 (6) (2022) 7704–7713

    2022

  11. [18]

    Z. Lian, Y. Kobayashi, J. J. M. Vequizo, C. S. K. Ranasinghe, A. Yamakata, T. Nagai, K. Ki- moto, K. Kobayashi, K. Tanaka, T. Teranishi, et al., Harnessing infrared solar energy with plas- monic energy upconversion, Nature Sustainabil- ity 5 (12) (2022) 1092–1099

    2022

  12. [19]

    Z. Li, J. Zi, X. Luan, Y. Zhong, M. Qu, Y. Wang, Z. Lian, Localized surface plasmon resonance promotes metal–organic framework-based pho- tocatalytic hydrogen evolution, Advanced Func- tional Materials 33 (33) (2023) 2303069

    2023

  13. [20]

    F. Gao, H. Xiao, J. Yang, X. Luan, D. Fang, L. Yang, J. Zi, Z. Lian, Modulation of electronic density in ultrathin g-c3n4 for enhanced photo- catalytic hydrogen evolution through an efficient hydrogen spillover pathway, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 341 (2024) 123334

    2024

  14. [21]

    Y.AlSalka, A.Hakki, J.Schneider, D.W.Bahne- mann, Co-catalyst-free photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on tio2: Synthesis of optimized pho- tocatalyst through statistical material science, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 238 (2018) 422–433

    2018

  15. [22]

    J. Wang, Q. Hao, R. Yang, X. Niu, R. Wang, L. Yang, Q. Huang, J. Ye, H. Yang, Y. Wu, A dual s-scheme heterojunction srtio3/srco3/c- doped tio2 as h2 production photocatalyst and its charge transfer mechanism, Applied Cataly- sis B: Environment and Energy (2024) 124232

    2024

  16. [23]

    M. Ma, J. Liu, H. Zhao, S. Yue, L. Zhong, Y. Huang, X. Jia, K. Liu, X. Li, Z. Wang, et al., Broadened photocatalytic capability to near-infrared for cds hybrids and positioning hy- drogen evolution sites, Applied Catalysis B: En- vironmental 325 (2023) 122327

    2023

  17. [24]

    J. Xu, W. Zhong, D. Gao, X. Wang, P. Wang, H. Yu, Phosphorus-enriched platinum diphos- phide nanodots as a highly efficient cocatalyst for photocatalytic h2 evolution of cds, Chemical Engineering Journal 439 (2022) 135758

    2022

  18. [25]

    Q. Xi, J. Liu, F. Xie, A. Jian, Z. Sun, A. Zhou, X. Jian, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Li, et al., Electron-parking engineering as- sisted znin2s4/mo2tic2-ru photocatalytic hydro- gen evolution for efficient solar energy conversion and storage, Applied Catalysis B: Environment and En...

    2024

  19. [26]

    X. Sun, M. Song, F. Liu, H. Peng, T. Zhao, S.-F. Yin, P. Chen, Interfacial chemical bond regulating the electronic coupling of znin2s4- x- wo3- x for enhancing the photocatalytic pollu- tions degradation coupled with hydrogen evo- lution, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 342...

    2024

  20. [27]

    J. Fu, J. Yu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, g-c3n4-based heterostructured photocatalysts, Advanced En- ergy Materials 8 (3) (2018) 1701503. 14

    2018

  21. [28]

    X. Cong, P. Mazierski, M. Miodyńska, et al., The role of tio2 and gc3n4 bimetallic cata- lysts in boosting antibiotic resistance gene removal through photocatalyst assisted perox- one process, Scientific Reports 14 (2024) 22897. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-74147-4. URLhttps://doi.o...

    2024 doi

  22. [29]

    J. Wen, J. Xie, X. Chen, X. Li, A review on g-c3n4-based photocatalysts, Applied Surface Science 391 (2017) 72–123, 2nd International Symposium on Energy and Environmen- tal Photocatalytic Materials.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.030. URLhttps://www.sciencedirec...

    2017 doi

  23. [30]

    X. Yan, C. Zhang, J. Hu, Y. Zhou, Z. Lv, Im- mobilization of co nanoparticles into n-doped carbon nanotube on g-c3n4 via coordination- polymerization integrated strategy for efficient h2 evolution reaction at all ph values, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 342 (2024) 123354

    2024

  24. [31]

    Mahvelati-Shamsabadi, K

    T. Mahvelati-Shamsabadi, K. C. Bhamu, S.-h. Lee, T. T. Dang, V. H. Khoi, S. H. Hur, W. M. Choi, S. G. Kang, T. J. Shin, J. S. Chung, Coor- dinatively unsaturated atomically dispersed pt+ 2-n4 sites on hexagonal nanosheet structure of g- c3n4forhigh-performancephotocatalytich2p...

    2023

  25. [32]

    A. Y. Liu, M. L. Cohen, Prediction of new low compressibility solids, Science 245 (4920) (1989) 841–842

    1989

  26. [33]

    E. G. Gillan, Synthesis of nitrogen-rich carbon nitride networks from an energetic molecular azide precursor, Chemistry of materials 12 (12) (2000) 3906–3912

    2000

  27. [34]

    Zhang, X

    X. Zhang, X. Xia, P. Yang, Nanoarchitecton- ics with w18o49 nanobelts and b-doped g-c3n4 nanosheets towards no and 4-nitrophenol conver- sion, Environ. Sci.: Nano 11 (2024) 4186–4195. doi:10.1039/D4EN00399C. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D4EN00399C

    2024 doi

  28. [35]

    Zhang, P

    X. Zhang, P. Yang, Advances in noble metal-modified g-C3N4 heterostructures to- ward enhanced photocatalytic redox ability, International Journal of Minerals, Metal- lurgy, and Materials 31 (2024) 2368–2389. doi:10.1007/s12613-024-2924-6. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/ s12613-024-2924-6

    2024 doi

  29. [36]

    S. Tong, X. Zhang, P. Yang, G-c3n4 sheet nanoarchitectonics with island-like crys- talline/amorphous homojunctions towards efficient h2 and h2o2 evolution, Environmental Research 236 (2023) 116805.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116805. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect....

    2023

  30. [37]

    L. Zhou, L. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Lei, Y. Liu, The preparation, and applications of gc 3 n 4/tio 2 heterojunction catalysts—a review, Research on Chemical Intermediates 43 (2017) 2081–2101

    2017

  31. [38]

    Kroke, M

    E. Kroke, M. Schwarz, E. Horath-Bordon, P. Kroll, B. Noll, A. D. Norman, Tri-s-triazine derivatives. part i. from trichloro-tri-s-triazine to graphitic c 3 n 4 structures, New Journal of Chemistry 26 (5) (2002) 508–512

    2002

  32. [39]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dy- namics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 558–561.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.47.558

    1993 doi

  33. [40]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical review B 54 (16) (1996) 11169

    1996

  34. [41]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, General- ized gradient approximation made simple, Phys- ical review letters 77 (18) (1996) 3865

    1996

  35. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, C. Fiol- hais, Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Ap- plications of the generalized gradient approxima- tion for exchange and correlation, Physical re- view B 46 (11) (1992) 6671

    1992

  36. [43]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization ofdensityfunctionaldispersioncorrection(dft-d) forthe94elementsh-pu, TheJournalofchemical physics 132 (15) (2010). 15

    2010

  37. [44]

    Elstner, D

    M. Elstner, D. Porezag, G. Jungnickel, J. Elsner, M. Haugk, T. Frauenheim, S. Suhai, G. Seifert, Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight- binding method for simulations of complex ma- terials properties, Physical Review B 58 (11) (1998) 7260

    1998

  38. [45]

    M. Gaus, Q. Cui, M. Elstner, Dftb3: Ex- tension of the self-consistent-charge density- functionaltight-bindingmethod(scc-dftb), Jour- nal of Chemical Theory and Computation 7 (4) (2011) 931–948.doi:10.1021/ct100684s

    2011 doi

  39. [46]

    Hourahine, B

    B. Hourahine, B. Aradi, V. Blum, F. Bonafe, et al., DFTB+, a software package for efficient approximate density functional theory based atomistic simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152 (12) (2020) 124101

    2020

  40. [47]

    Q. Cui, M. Elstner, E. Kaxiras, T. Frauen- heim, M. Karplus, A qm/mm implementation of the self-consistent charge density functional tight binding (scc-dftb) method, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 105 (2) (2001) 569–585. doi:10.1021/jp0029109

    2001 doi

  41. [49]

    Novotny, F

    M. Novotny, F. J. Dominguez-Gutierrez, P. Krstic, A computational study of hydrogen detection by borophene, J. Mater. Chem. C 5 (2017) 5426–5433

    2017

  42. [50]

    F. J. Dominguez-Gutierrez, P. S. Krstic, S. Irle, R. Cabrera-Trujillo, Low-energy hydrogen up- take by small-cage cn and cn-1b fullerenes, Car- bon 134 (2018) 189–198

    2018

  43. [51]

    LĂłpez-Plascencia, M

    C. LĂłpez-Plascencia, M. MartĂnez-Negrete- Vera, R. Garibay-Alonso, Reactive force field study of the molecular structure of water under thermal and electric effects: Water splitting phenomenon, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (8) (2017) 4774–4781.doi:https: //doi....

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    Huang, Q

    X. Huang, Q. Li, J. Wang, L. Liu, Produc- tion mechanism of single excessive hydrogen in current transformers: A reactive molec- ular dynamics simulation study, Materials & Design 177 (2019) 107850.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107850. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect...

    2019

  45. [53]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexi- ble simulation tool for particle-based materia...

    2022

  46. [54]

    Senftle, S

    T. Senftle, S. Hong, M. Islam, et al., The reaxff reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions, npj Computational Materials 2 (2016) 15011. doi:10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ npjcompumats.2015.11

    2016 doi

  47. [55]

    Goddard, Reaxff: A reactive force field for hy- drocarbons, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 105 (41) (2001) 9396–9409.doi:10.1021/ jp004368u

    A.C.T.vanDuin, S.Dasgupta, F.Lorant, W.A. Goddard, Reaxff: A reactive force field for hy- drocarbons, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 105 (41) (2001) 9396–9409.doi:10.1021/ jp004368u

    2001

  48. [56]

    A. K. Rappe, W. A. I. Goddard, Charge equili- bration for molecular dynamics simulations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 95 (8) (1991) 3358–3363.doi:10.1021/j100161a070

    1991 doi

  49. [57]

    H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations, Physical review B 13 (12) (1976) 5188

    1976

  50. [58]

    Guenole, W

    J. Guenole, W. G. Nehring, A. Vaid, F. Houlle, Z. Xie, A. Prakash, E. Bitzek, Assessment and optimization of the fast inertial relaxation en- gine (fire) for energy minimization in atomistic simulations and its implementation in lammps, Computational Materials Science 175 (202...

    2020

  51. [59]

    J. Liu, E. Hua, High photocatalytic activity of heptazine-based g-c3n4/sns2 heterojunction and its origin: Insights from hybrid dft, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121 (46) (2017) 25827–25835.doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07914. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc. 7b07914

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    Yang, Z.-Y

    C. Yang, Z.-Y. Zhao, H.-T. Wei, X.-Y. Deng, Q.-J. Liu, Dft calculations for single-atom con- finement effects of noble metals on monolayer g- c3n4 for photocatalytic applications, RSC Adv. 11 (2021) 4276–4285.doi:10.1039/D0RA09815A

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    M. J. Molaei, Graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4) synthesis and heterostructures, principles, mechanisms, and recent advances: A critical review, International Journal of Hydrogen En- ergy 48 (84) (2023) 32708–32728.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.066. URLhttps:/...

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    Ong, L.-L

    W.-J. Ong, L.-L. Tan, Y. H. Ng, S.-T. Yong, S.- P. Chai, Graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability?, Chemical reviews 116 (12) (2016) 7159–7329

    2016

  55. [63]

    Mishra, A

    A. Mishra, A. Mehta, S. Basu, N. P. Shetti, K. R. Reddy, T. M. Aminabhavi, Graphitic carbon ni- tride (g–c3n4)–based metal-free photocatalysts for water splitting: a review, Carbon 149 (2019) 693–721

    2019

  56. [64]

    M.S.Akple, J.Low, S.Wageh, A.A.Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, J. Zhang, Enhanced visible light photo- catalytic h2-production of g-c3n4/ws2 compos- ite heterostructures, Applied Surface Science 358 (2015) 196–203

    2015

  57. [65]

    Xu, S.-P

    Y. Xu, S.-P. Gao, Band gap of c3n4 in the gw approximation, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37 (15) (2012) 11072–11080, hydrogen Enriched Methane.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.138. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0360319912010713

    2012 doi

  58. [66]

    Elstner, P

    M. Elstner, P. Hobza, T. Frauenheim, S. Suhai, E. Kaxiras, Hydrogen bonding and stacking in- teractions of nucleic acid base pairs: A density- functional-theory based treatment, The Journal of Chemical Physics 114 (12) (2001) 5149–5155

    2001

  59. [67]

    Q. Gao, H. L. Wang, L. F. Zhang, et al., Computational study on the half-metallicity in transition metal—oxide-incorporated 2d g- c3n4 nanosheets, Frontiers of Physics 13 (2018) 138108.doi:10.1007/s11467-018-0754-6

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    D. M. Marquez, C. G. Sánchez, Quantum effi- ciency of the photo-induced electronic transfer in dye–tio2 complexes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 (2018) 26280–26287

    2018

  61. [69]

    M. B. Oviedo, C. F. A. Negre, C. G. Sánchez, Dynamical simulation of the optical response of photosynthetic pigments, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 (2010) 6706–6711

    2010

  62. [70]

    Pecchia, G

    A. Pecchia, G. Penazzi, L. Salvucci, A. D. Carlo, Non-equilibrium green’s functions in density functional tight binding: method and appli- cations, New Journal of Physics 10 (6) (2008) 065022.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/065022. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1367-2630/10/6/065022

    2008 doi

  63. [71]

    Aligayev, U

    A. Aligayev, U. Jabbarli, U. Samadova, F. Dominguez–Gutierrez, S. Papanikolaou, Q. Huang, Dissociative mechanism from nh 3 and ch4 on ni-doped graphene: Tuning electronic and optical properties, Applied Surface Science (2024) 162022doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024....

    2024

  64. [72]

    Shahrokhi, P

    M. Shahrokhi, P. Raybaud, T. Le Bahers, On the understanding of the optoelectronic properties of s-doped moo3 and o-doped mos2 bulk systems: a dft perspective, J. Mater. Chem. C 8 (2020) 9064–9074.doi:10.1039/D0TC02066D

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    Shahrokhi, P

    M. Shahrokhi, P. Raybaud, T. Le Bahers, 2d moo3–xsx/mos2 van der waals assembly: A tunable heterojunction with attractive proper- ties for photocatalysis, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (30) (2021) 36465–36474.doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c08200

    2021 doi

  66. [74]

    Shahrokhi, T

    M. Shahrokhi, T. Le Bahers, P. Raybaud, Tailor- ing the optoelectronic properties and dielectric profiles of few-layer s-doped moo3 and o-doped 17 mos2 nanosheets: a first-principles study, Phys. Chem.Chem.Phys.24(2022)25440–25451.doi: 10.1039/D2CP03410G

    2022 doi

  67. [75]

    F. J. Dominguez-Gutierrez, A. Aligayev, W. Huo, M. Chourashiya, Q. Xu, S. Papaniko- laou, Dynamical pathways for the interaction of o2, h2o, ch4, and co2 with α-alumina surfaces: Density-functional tight-binding calculations, physica status solidi (b) n/a (n/a) 2200567. 18

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.