Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Coherent electric field manipulation of nuclear spin qudit

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single electric field along ZnO’s c-axis drives universal gates on an Mn2+ nuclear spin qudit as efficiently as magnetic driving.

desk verdict Solid experimental nSEC data and a clean ΔmI=2 electric drive in Mn2+:ZnO; the uniaxial “universal control” claim is real for Z-gates and for B⊥c, but the B∥c NER mechanism is still under-explained. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26716 v1 pith:4C6U5Y4Z submitted 2026-07-29 quant-ph

Sumin Lim , Mikhail V. Vaganov , Niccolo Fontana , Junjie Liu , Arzhang Ardavan This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords nuclearspinquditelectric-fieldcontrolMn2+inZnOhyperfineenhancementelectricresonancespin-electriccouplingpiezoelectricoxidehost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nuclear spins are prized for long coherence but are hard to control electrically in ordinary semiconductors, which slows scalable devices. This paper shows that a highly polarizable oxide host, Mn2+-doped ZnO, removes that bottleneck: electric fields modulate the spin Hamiltonian, and the hyperfine-coupled electron amplifies the effect so that an I = 5/2 nuclear qudit can be manipulated coherently. Both resonant (X/Y) and non-resonant (Z) operations work with one uniaxial field along the crystal c-axis, and the rates match or beat conventional magnetic driving. The result argues that materials choice—doped oxides rather than only silicon—can make all-electrical nuclear-spin control practical for computing, sensing, and networking.

What carries the argument

Hyperfine-enhanced nuclear spin-electric coupling (nSEC): electric fields tune electron zero-field splitting, hyperfine, and quadrupole terms; electron–nuclear mixing then transfers those large electron-spin electric couplings into fast nuclear control, analogous to hyperfine enhancement in NMR.

What would settle it

Repeat the nuclear electric resonance nutation with B0 aligned to the c-axis to better than ~1° (or with independently measured off-diagonal A and Q components): if the electric nutation rate collapses to near zero while the DC phase-shift nSECs remain, the parallel-field drive mechanism claimed in the paper fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In Mn2+-doped ZnO, electric-field modulation of the spin Hamiltonian is amplified by the hyperfine-coupled electron spin and yields efficient resonant and non-resonant coherent control of an I = 5/2 nuclear spin qudit. A single uniaxial electric field along the crystallographic c-axis implements universal single-qudit gates with efficiencies comparable to or exceeding conventional magnetic-field driving, supporting doped oxides as hosts for electrically controllable spin qubits.

Load-bearing premise

The measured electric-drive rates when the magnetic field is nominally along the crystal axis are still caused by the characterized couplings, even though the main axial terms should not drive transitions to first order and need small misalignment or unmeasured off-diagonal terms to explain the data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Universal single-qudit gates (X, Y, Z) can be implemented with one physical electric gate electrode along the c-axis, simplifying nanoscale device wiring.
  • Electric control can directly drive ΔmI = ±2 transitions that are magnetically forbidden, shortening ladder sequences in qudit algorithms.
  • Nuclear coherence limited by electron T1e can be pushed toward seconds by lower temperature and isotopic purification of 67Zn, making the platform competitive with silicon donors for long-lived qubits.
  • The electron spin remains available as an ancilla for readout and multi-qubit coupling while the nucleus stores the logical state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same piezoelectric amplification appears in other transition-metal-doped wurtzite or ferroelectric oxides, the materials menu for all-electric nuclear qudits expands beyond ZnO:Mn.
  • Device designs that already route DC gates along a polar axis could reuse those electrodes for both Stark tuning and resonant NER without adding RF magnetic coils.
  • Quantitative NER rates under controlled B0 tilt would separate misalignment from true off-diagonal electric modulation and tighten the spin-Hamiltonian model for gate calibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports coherent nuclear spin–electric couplings (nSECs) for the I = 5/2 55Mn nucleus of Mn2+ in piezoelectric ZnO. Using modified ENCT and ENDOR sequences, the authors extract E-field sensitivities of D, A∥, A⊥ and Qzz (Table I) from nuclear-coherence phase shifts across multiple ms manifolds (Fig. 1d). They attribute the large nSECs to hyperfine mixing that lets electron-spin electric couplings contribute to nuclear control, analogous to hyperfine-enhanced NMR. With a single uniaxial E-field along the crystal c-axis they demonstrate non-resonant phase (Z) gates and resonant NER, including a magnetically forbidden ΔmI = 2 transition when B0 ⊥ c (Fig. 3). They conclude that this enables universal single-qudit operations with efficiencies comparable to or exceeding magnetic driving, and that doped oxides are promising hosts for electrically controllable spin qubits.

Significance. Electric-field control of nuclear spins at the nanoscale is a recognized bottleneck for solid-state spin qubits; most prior work on donors in Si requires very large fields and yields slow gates. Demonstrating substantially stronger, hyperfine-amplified nSECs in a piezoelectric oxide, together with clean multi-manifold DC phase data, simultaneous Hamiltonian fits, and an electric-only ΔmI = 2 drive, is a concrete materials advance. The uniaxial-gate architecture and the explicit link to qudit universal gates (including QFT-relevant Z operations) are of clear interest to the spin-qubit and molecular-magnet communities. The experimental core (Fig. 1d, Table I, Fig. 3 phase-matched ΔmI = 2) is reproducible in principle and does not rest on circular fitting.

major comments (2)
  1. [NER discussion after Fig. 2; Table I; Abstract] After Fig. 2 and in the accompanying text the authors state that the fitted axial parameters (D, A∥, Qzz in Table I) commute with Sz and Iz when B0 ∥ c, so to first order they cannot drive the observed NER nutations; they invoke either a small misalignment (<3°) or unmeasured off-diagonal A/Q components, neither of which is quantitatively shown to reproduce the measured rates. This is load-bearing for the abstract/conclusion claim that resonant X/Y gates and “universal single-qudit gate operations” are achieved with the same characterized uniaxial nSECs. Either (i) supply a quantitative estimate (misalignment angle or induced off-diagonal magnitudes) that accounts for the nutation rates in Fig. 2c, or (ii) clearly restrict the resonant-universal-control claim to the B0 ⊥ c geometry (Fig. 3), where the axial mechanism is first-order allowed and the ΔmI = 2 data are convincing.
  2. [Abstract; Figs. 2c–d, 3; final summary paragraph] The efficiency claim “comparable to or exceeding those of conventional magnetic-field driving” is only partially supported. For ms = −1/2 (Fig. 2c) NER nutation is substantially slower than B-driven NMR at the same RF power; only in the accidentally hyperfine-suppressed ms = +1/2 manifold (Fig. 2d) and for the forbidden ΔmI = 2 line (Fig. 3c) is E-drive relatively advantageous. A short quantitative comparison (Rabi rates or gate times per unit power/field for representative transitions) should replace the unqualified phrasing in the abstract and final paragraph.
minor comments (5)
  1. [passim] Throughout the extracted text, spin projections appear with broken spacing (“them s”, “m I”, “δm I”). Ensure consistent ms, mI notation in the final PDF.
  2. [Fig. 1(d)] Fig. 1(d) panels would benefit from a common vertical scale or explicit statement of the E-field amplitude used for all traces so that relative nSEC strengths are immediately readable.
  3. [paragraph discussing Fig. 2(c)] The RF E-field amplitude at the sample (∼7×10^4 V/m) is estimated under strong impedance mismatch; a brief note on how this value was obtained (voltage, electrode spacing, or calibration) would aid reproducibility.
  4. [References] Reference list: the Rubín-Osanz et al. Nature Communications entry appears with a 2026 DOI placeholder style; confirm final citation details.
  5. [main text citations to SI] Supplementary Information is cited for conditional Z-gates and for the ΔmI = 2 phase simulation; ensure those sections are complete and cross-referenced by figure/equation number in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: experimental nSEC/NER measurements with ordinary Hamiltonian parameter fitting, not predictions forced by construction.

full rationale

This is a self-contained experimental paper. Nuclear spin-electric couplings are measured via ENCT phase shifts (Fig. 1), E-field sensitivities of D, A∥, A⊥, and Qzz are extracted by simultaneous fit to those data (Table I), and resonant NER is then demonstrated independently with AC E-fields (Figs. 2–3). Fitting Hamiltonian coefficients to phase-shift data and reporting their contributions is ordinary parameter extraction, not a ‘prediction’ that reduces to the fit by construction. Prior self-citations (George et al. 2013 on eSEC of D; Lim/Liu/Ardavan qudit-encoding work) supply background methods and context; they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as the sole warrant that forces the new nSEC/NER results. The admitted quantitative gap for B0∥c NER nutation rates (axial terms commute with Sz/Iz to first order) is a mechanistic/correctness soft spot, not circular reasoning. No step in the claimed chain collapses Eq. X into Eq. Y by definition or by self-citation alone.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Load-bearing content is experimental: the spin Hamiltonian form and hyperfine-mixing picture are standard domain tools; the quantitative claim rests on fitted E-field sensitivities of D, A∥, A⊥, Qzz and on the interpretation that residual NER drive when B0∥c still comes from those (or closely related) couplings despite first-order commutation. No new particles or forces are invented.

free parameters (5)
  • E-field sensitivity of D = 77±2 kHz/(kV/cm)
    Fitted simultaneously to all nSEC phase-shift curves in Fig. 1d; dominates many transition shifts. Effect of F is stated to be indistinguishable and absorbed into D.
  • E-field sensitivity of A∥ = 0.103±0.003 kHz/(kV/cm)
    Fitted from ms- and ΔmI-dependent nSEC pattern; required for good global fit.
  • E-field sensitivity of A⊥ = −0.10±0.02 kHz/(kV/cm)
    ENDOR less sensitive to A⊥; included because it significantly improves the global fit.
  • E-field sensitivity of Qzz = −0.104±0.003 kHz/(kV/cm)
    Fitted from transition-dependent nSECs; explains part of outer nuclear transitions and ΔmI=2 drive when B0⊥c.
  • RF E-field amplitude at sample = ~7e4 V/m at normalized power 1
    Estimated from impedance-mismatched parallel-plate drive at max power for nutation comparisons (~7×10^4 V/m); enters efficiency claims vs ~10 G B1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Low-T Mn2+:ZnO spin Hamiltonian is Eq. (1) with axial D, F, A∥, A⊥, Qzz (Hausmann & Huppertz; Böttcher et al.).
    Used throughout to assign |ms,mI⟩ labels, ENDOR frequencies, and which parameters E can modulate.
  • domain assumption Transverse hyperfine A⊥ mixes electron and nuclear states and thereby transfers eSEC into effective nSEC (hyperfine-enhancement analogy).
    Central interpretive claim for why nSECs are large and why ms=±1/2 manifolds differ; standard second-order hyperfine physics.
  • domain assumption Parallel-plate electrodes deliver a predominantly electric RF field with negligible parasitic B1 at the sample.
    Required to attribute observed resonances to electric-dipole (NER) rather than magnetic-dipole driving.
  • ad hoc to paper Small B0 misalignment (<3°) and/or E-induced off-diagonal A/Q terms explain finite NER rates when B0∥c despite axial terms commuting with Sz,Iz.
    Invoked explicitly because first-order theory with Table I parameters does not produce the observed nutations; not independently measured.
  • domain assumption Nuclear T2n is limited by electron T1e and can be extended by lower T and 67Zn isotopic purification.
    Used in the outlook to argue technological relevance despite present coherence limits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent electric field manipulation of nuclear spin qudit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4C6U5Y4Z

@misc{pith2026260726716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent electric field manipulation of nuclear spin qudit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4C6U5Y4Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26716}
}
read the original abstract

Spins in condensed matter, especially well-isolated nuclear spins, offer attractive quantum degrees of freedom for computing, sensing, and networking because of their long coherence times. The possibility of electric-field control is an important feature for practical scalable quantum technologies, but, typically, nuclear spins couple only weakly to electric fields in conventional semiconductor hosts, limiting operation efficiency. Here we show that a choice of a highly polarizable oxide host can overcome this bottleneck. In Mn2+ doped ZnO, electric-field modulation of the spin Hamiltonian is amplified by hyperfine-coupled electron spins, and offers efficient electric-field manipulation of an I = 5/2 nuclear spin qudit, in a manner analogous to the hyperfine enhancement of conventional nuclear magnetic resonance. We demonstrate both resonant and non-resonant coherent manipulation using a single uniaxial electric field applied along the crystalline c-axis, the polarization axis of ZnO. This approach allows universal single-qudit gate operations with efficiencies comparable to or exceeding those of conventional magnetic-field driving. These results support the deployment of doped oxides as active host materials for electrically controllable spin qubits, highlighting the importance of materials design in developing scalable quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26716 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a). A selective nuclear spin mixing pulse, which can be either a magnetic field (B-field) or an E-field RF pulse, modifies the populations of the spin states and consequently alters the final echo signal. We perform experiments with both B-field and E-field pulses so that we may directly compare standard NMRs with NERs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Burkard, T

    G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor spin qubits, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 025003 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    B. E. Kane, A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer, Nature393, 133 (1998)

    1998

  3. [3]

    J. J. L. Morton, A. M. Tyryshkin, R. M. Brown, S. Shankar, B. W. Lovett, A. Ardavan, T. Schenkel, E. E. Haller, J. W. Ager, and S. A. Lyon, Solid-state quantum memory using the 31p nuclear spin, Nature455, 1085 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    J. J. Pla, K. Y. Tan, J. P. Dehollain, W. H. Lim, J. J. L. Morton, D. N. Jamieson, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, A single-atom electron spin qubit in silicon, Nature489, 541 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Asaad, V

    S. Asaad, V. Mourik, B. Joecker, M. A. I. Johnson, A. D. Baczewski, H. R. Firgau, M. T. Madzik, V. Schmitt, J. J. Pla, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, J. C. McCallum, A. S. Dzurak, A. Laucht, and A. Morello, Coherent electrical control of a single high-spin nucleus in silicon, Nature579, 205 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    M. T. Madzik, S. Asaad, A. Youssry, B. Joecker, K. M. Rudinger, E. Nielsen, K. C. Young, T. J. Proctor, A. D. Baczewski, A. Laucht, V. Schmitt, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, A. M. Jakob, B. C. Johnson, D. N. Jamieson, A. S. Dzurak, C. Ferrie, R. Blume-Kohout, and A. Morello, Precision tomography of a three-qubit donor quantum processor in silicon, Nature601, ...

    2022

  7. [7]

    Gilbert, T

    W. Gilbert, T. Tanttu, W. H. Lim, M. Feng, J. Y. Huang, J. D. Cifuentes, S. Serrano, P. Y. Mai, R. C. C. Leon, C. C. Escott, K. M. Itoh, N. V. Abrosimov, H.-J. Pohl, M. L. W. Thewalt, 12 F. E. Hudson, A. Morello, A. Laucht, C. H. Yang, A. Saraiva, and A. S. Dzurak, On-demand electrical control of spin qubits, Nature Nanotechnology18, 131 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Reiner, Y

    J. Reiner, Y. Chung, S. H. Misha, C. Lehner, C. Moehle, D. Poulos, S. Monir, K. J. Charde, P. Macha, L. Kranz, I. Thorvaldson, B. Thorgrimsson, D. Keith, Y. L. Hsueh, R. Rahman, S. K. Gorman, J. G. Keizer, and M. Y. Simmons, High-fidelity initialization and control of electron and nuclear spins in a four-qubit register, Nature Nanotechnology19, 605 (2024)

    2024

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    H. G. Stemp, M. R. van Blankenstein, S. Asaad, M. T. Madzik, B. Joecker, H. R. Firgau, A. Laucht, F. E. Hudson, A. S. Dzurak, K. M. Itoh, A. M. Jakob, B. C. Johnson, D. N. Jamieson, and A. Morello, Scalable entanglement of nuclear spins mediated by electron ex- change, Science...

    2025

  2. [10]

    X. Yu, B. Wilhelm, D. Holmes, A. Vaartjes, D. Schwienbacher, M. Nurizzo, A. Kringhoj, M. R. van Blankenstein, A. M. Jakob, P. Gupta, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, R. J. Murray, R. Blume-Kohout, T. D. Ladd, N. Anand, A. S. Dzurak, B. C. Sanders, D. N. Jamieson, and A. Morello, Schr...

    2025

  3. [11]

    Chiesa, E

    A. Chiesa, E. Macaluso, F. Petiziol, S. Wimberger, P. Santini, and S. Carretta, Molecular nanomagnets as qubits with embedded quantum-error correction, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 8610 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    J. A. Gross, Designing codes around interactions: The case of a spin, Physical Review Letters 127, 010504 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    S. Lim, J. Liu, and A. Ardavan, Fault-tolerant qubit encoding using a spin-7/2 qudit, Physical Review A108, 062403 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    S. Lim, M. V. Vaganov, J. Liu, and A. Ardavan, Demonstrating experimentally the encoding and dynamics of an error-correctable logical qubit on a hyperfine-coupled nuclear spin qudit, Physical Review Letters134, 070603 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Laucht, J

    A. Laucht, J. T. Muhonen, F. A. Mohiyaddin, R. Kalra, J. P. Dehollain, S. Freer, F. E. Hudson, M. Veldhorst, R. Rahman, G. Klimeck, K. M. Itoh, D. N. Jamieson, J. C. McCallum, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, Electrically controlling single-spin qubits in a continuous microwave f...

    2015

  8. [16]

    F. R. Bradbury, A. M. Tyryshkin, G. Sabouret, J. Bokor, T. Schenkel, and S. A. Lyon, Stark tuning of donor electron spins in silicon, Physical Review Letters97, 176404 (2006). 13

    2006

  9. [17]

    C. C. Lo, S. Simmons, R. L. Nardo, C. D. Weis, A. M. Tyryshkin, J. Meijer, D. Rogalla, S. A. Lyon, J. Bokor, T. Schenkel, and J. J. L. Morton, Stark shift and field ionization of arsenic donors in 28si-silicon-on-insulator structures, Applied Physics Letters104, 10.1063/1.4876...

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    G. Pica, G. Wolfowicz, M. Urdampilleta, M. L. W. Thewalt, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, J. J. L. Morton, R. N. Bhatt, S. A. Lyon, and B. W. Lovett, Hyperfine stark effect of shallow donors in silicon, Physical Review B90, 195204 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    J. T. Muhonen, J. P. Dehollain, A. Laucht, F. E. Hudson, R. Kalra, T. Sekiguchi, K. M. Itoh, D. N. Jamieson, J. C. McCallum, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device, Nature Nanotechnology9, 986 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Manipatruni, D

    S. Manipatruni, D. E. Nikonov, C.-C. Lin, T. A. Gosavi, H. Liu, B. Prasad, Y.-L. Huang, E. Bonturim, R. Ramesh, and I. A. Young, Scalable energy-efficient magnetoelectric spin–orbit logic, Nature565, 35 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    N. A. Spaldin and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelectric multiferroics, Nature Materials 18, 203 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    R. E. George, J. P. Edwards, and A. Ardavan, Coherent spin control by electrical manipulation of the magnetic anisotropy, Physical Review Letters110, 027601 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    J. Liu, V. V. Laguta, K. Inzani, W. Huang, S. Das, R. Chatterjee, E. Sheridan, S. M. Griffin, A. Ardavan, and R. Ramesh, Coherent electric field manipulation of fe 3+ spins in pbtio 3, Science Advances7, eabf8103 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    hui Fang, Z

    Y. hui Fang, Z. Liu, S. Zhou, P. xiang Fu, Y.-X. Wang, Z.-Y. Wang, Z. ming Wang, S. Gao, and S.-D. Jiang, Spin-electric coupling with anisotropy-induced vanishment and enhancement in molecular ferroelectrics, Journal of the American Chemical Society144, 8605 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Liu, J.-X

    Y.-C. Liu, J.-X. Chen, P.-X. Fu, Y.-Q. Liao, Y.-H. Wang, Y.-X. Wang, Z. Liu, S. Gao, and S.-D. Jiang, Electrically induced crystal field distortion in a ferroelectric perovskite revealed by electron paramagnetic resonance, Journal of the American Chemical Society146, 19397 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Hausmann and H

    A. Hausmann and H. Huppertz, Paramagnetic resonance of zno:mn++ single crystals, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids29, 1369 (1968). 14

    1968

  20. [28]

    Bottcher, A

    R. Bottcher, A. P¨ oppl, M. Lorenz, S. Friedlander, D. Spemann, and M. Grundmann, 55mn pulsed endor spectroscopy of mn2+ ions in zno thin films and single crystal, Journal of Mag- netic Resonance245, 79 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Sangtawesin, T

    S. Sangtawesin, T. O. Brundage, and J. R. Petta, Fast room-temperature phase gate on a single nuclear spin in diamond, Physical Review Letters113, 020506 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Sangtawesin, C

    S. Sangtawesin, C. A. McLellan, B. A. Myers, A. C. B. Jayich, D. D. Awschalom, and J. R. Petta, Hyperfine-enhanced gyromagnetic ratio of a nuclear spin in diamond, New Journal of Physics18, 083016 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Brennen, D

    G. Brennen, D. O’Leary, and S. Bullock, Criteria for exact qudit universality, Physical Review A71, 052318 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Frontiers in Physics8, 10.3389/fphy.2020.589504 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Y. Chi, J. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Mao, Z. Zhou, X. Chen, C. Zhai, J. Bao, T. Dai, H. Yuan, M. Zhang, D. Dai, B. Tang, Y. Yang, Z. Li, Y. Ding, L. K. Oxenlowe, M. G. Thompson, J. L. O’Brien, Y. Li, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, A programmable qudit-based quantum processor, Nature Communic...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Rub ´ ın-Osanz, L

    M. Rub ´ ın-Osanz, L. Bersani, S. Chicco, G. Allodi, R. D. Renzi, A. Mavromagoulos, M. D. Roy, S. Piligkos, E. Garlatti, and S. Carretta, Implementing the quantum fourier transform on a molecular qudit with full refocusing and state tomography, Nature Communications 10.1038/s4...

    2026 doi

  27. [35]

    I. F. de Fuentes, T. Botzem, M. A. I. Johnson, A. Vaartjes, S. Asaad, V. Mourik, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, B. C. Johnson, A. M. Jakob, J. C. McCallum, D. N. Jamieson, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, Navigating the 16-dimensional hilbert space of a high-spin donor qudit with elec...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Pawlis, G

    A. Pawlis, G. Mussler, C. Krause, B. Bennemann, U. Breuer, and D. Gr¨ utzmacher, Mbe growth and optical properties of isotopically purified znse heterostructures, ACS Applied Electronic Materials1, 44 (2019). 15

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.