Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

Bouncing Cosmology and Cosmological Dynamics in $f(Q,T)$ Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A reconstructed f(Q,T) gravity model unifies a nonsingular asymmetric bounce with late-time dark-energy domination.

desk verdict Competent reconstruction: the hybrid bounce-plus-DE history is put in by hand; f(Q,T) only supplies the ρ,p that support it. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26753 v1 pith:K547TGDN submitted 2026-07-29 gr-qc

Bhagwat Gidhad , A. S. Agrawal , S. A. Kadam This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 98.80.-k04.50.Kd
keywords BounceCosmologyf(QT)GravityNon-metricityHybridscalefactorEnergyconditionsDarkNonsingular
topics Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a single cosmological history in f(Q,T) gravity, where gravity is set by non-metricity coupled to matter, meant to cover both the early and late Universe. The authors insert a hybrid scale factor that mixes a matter-bounce piece with an exponential expansion piece, then reconstruct the pressure, energy density, and equation of state from the modified field equations. The resulting universe contracts, bounces smoothly at a finite past time without a Big Bang singularity, expands, and settles into dark-energy-like behavior near the present age. Energy conditions are checked to show that the null energy condition fails only near the bounce, as needed for a bounce, while the strong energy condition stays violated in line with acceleration. A sympathetic reader cares because the claim is that modified geometry alone can carry both the nonsingular early phase and today’s acceleration inside one framework.

What carries the argument

The hybrid scale factor a(t)=(a0 t^2+1)^n exp[(ts−t)^{1−γ}/(γ−1)], fed into the f(Q,T)=αQ^m+βT field equations that supply ρ, p, and ω from the non-metricity scalar Q and its coupling to the matter trace T.

What would settle it

Fit the same parameters to Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic chronometers, and CMB data and test whether a brief NEC violation at the bounce and ω_eff≃−1 today survive; a clear mismatch would refute the reconstruction as a viable full history.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Once reconstructed with f(Q,T)=αQ^m+βT and a hybrid scale factor, the model produces a nonsingular asymmetric bounce near t≃−0.09, where the Hubble parameter flips from negative to positive, then evolves so the effective equation of state approaches −1 at the present age, while energy conditions behave as required for a bounce followed by late acceleration.

Load-bearing premise

The bounce, its asymmetry, and the late acceleration are built in by choosing the hybrid scale factor by hand, not derived from the gravity equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The initial singularity is replaced by a smooth asymmetric bounce carried by the modified geometric sector.
  • Late-time acceleration arises without a separate cosmological-constant field.
  • NEC fails only in a small neighborhood of the bounce; SEC violation tracks accelerated expansion.
  • The power m of the non-metricity term imprints bump or ditch features on density and pressure near the bounce.
  • Observational datasets can constrain α, m, β, and the hybrid-scale parameters as the paper outlines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the expansion history is imposed by ansatz, the work functions mainly as a consistency check that f(Q,T) can host a desired bounce-plus-acceleration timeline rather than as a dynamical prediction of that timeline.
  • Reporting both the GR kinematic ω_eff and the fluid ω=p/ρ from the field equations leaves open whether those two ‘equations of state’ stay aligned away from general relativity.
  • The visible difference between m=1 and m=1.01 near the bounce suggests that even tiny nonlinear non-metricity corrections could leave targets for perturbation or primordial-spectrum studies.
  • If the reconstruction survives data fits, non-metricity–matter coupling would be a candidate stand-in for both exotic bounce matter and dark energy in one coupling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reconstructs a flat FLRW cosmology in f(Q,T)=αQ^m+βT gravity by imposing a hybrid scale factor that combines a matter-bounce piece with an exponential late-time factor (Eqs. 13a–13b). From the modified Friedmann equations it obtains analytic expressions for p, ρ and ω (Eqs. 11–12), plots H(t), ω_eff, the comoving Hubble radius, and the energy conditions (NEC/SEC/DEC), and reports a nonsingular asymmetric bounce near t≃−0.09 together with ω_eff≃−1 at t=13.8 Gyr. The central claim is that the reconstructed model unifies early-time bounce and late-time dark-energy acceleration within f(Q,T).

Significance. Reconstruction of bouncing cosmologies in f(Q,T) is an active but crowded niche. If the analysis were tightened, the paper would add a concrete hybrid-ansatz example with explicit NEC violation near the bounce and a late-time approach to ΛCDM-like behaviour, which is of incremental interest to the modified-gravity community. The algebra from the chosen f(Q,T) to ρ, p and the energy conditions is standard and reproducible from the given formulae. The work does not, however, derive the scale factor from the field equations or demonstrate an attractor, so its significance is that of a consistency check rather than a dynamical prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.A, Eqs. (13a–13b); Abstract; §VI] §III.A, Eqs. (13a–13b) and Abstract/§VI: The hybrid scale factor is imposed by hand (taken from prior work), not obtained as a solution of the f(Q,T) field equations (9)–(11). Bounce at t≃−0.09, H sign flip, r_h divergence, and late acceleration are therefore kinematic properties of the ansatz. The strong claims that the reconstructed model “effectively captures” and “reliably explains” early and late cosmic evolution overstate what a reconstruction can establish. The prose should be revised to state clearly that the cosmology is reconstructed for a prescribed a(t), and that f(Q,T) supplies the supporting ρ,p rather than generating the history.
  2. [§III.B, Eq. (14)] §III.B, Eq. (14): The effective EoS is defined by the GR kinematic formula ω_eff=−1−2Ḣ/(3H^2). In f(Q,T) the gravitational sector is modified, so the relation between Ḣ, H and the matter EoS is not the standard GR one; the paper already has a distinct matter EoS ω=p/ρ from Eq. (12). Using Eq. (14) to identify quintessence/phantom/ΛCDM epochs and to claim ω_eff≃−1 at 13.8 Gyr therefore needs justification, or else the discussion should be restricted to the model’s own ω (Eq. 12) and to the kinematic deceleration parameter.
  3. [§IV–V; Eqs. (11), (15); Fig. 5] §IV–V and parameter choices: Seven free parameters (a0, n, γ, ts, α, m, κ≈−0.5) are fixed by hand so that a bounce and late ω→−1 appear. With that freedom, finite ρ,p that violate NEC near the bounce (Eq. 15a, Fig. 5) are expected by construction and do not by themselves demonstrate that f(Q,T) selects a unified history. At minimum the paper should (i) state the reconstruction nature of the result in the abstract and conclusions, and (ii) discuss how sensitive the bounce location and late-time ω are to variations of the parameters, or motivate the specific values (especially κ=−0.49975, which sits very close to the singular locus κ=−1/2 in Eqs. 11 and 15).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; §I] Abstract and Introduction: several incomplete or repeated phrases (“the monopole, and monopole challenges”; “the progression of … and the parameter”; “the parameter” without specifying which). Proofread for grammar and missing words.
  2. [§III.A; §IV; Fig. 1, Fig. 4] Fig. 1 caption and text: bounce is quoted at t=−0.09 while the pressure/density extrema are discussed at t=0; a short clarification of why the minimum of a(t) and the extrema of ρ,p do not coincide would help the reader.
  3. [§II] Notation: Ξ is introduced as d/dt[f_Q H] then specialised; β=8πκ is used interchangeably with f_T. A single consistent notation paragraph in §II would reduce confusion.
  4. [§V] Energy-condition text (§V) says NEC is “marginally satisfied” yet “violated near the bounce”; align the wording with Fig. 5 (left), which shows a clear negative dip.
  5. [References] References: several entries have incomplete pagination or duplicated author lists; standardise to the journal’s style.

Circularity Check

5 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Hybrid a(t) is an imposed ansatz that already bounces and late-accelerates; bounce, H sign-flip, rh divergence, and kinematic ω_eff epochs are by construction, not predictions of f(Q,T).

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [§III.A, Eqs. (13a)–(13b); cite [66]]
    "The hybrid scale factor and its corresponding Hubble parameter [66] are given by a(t)=(a0 t^2+1)^n e^{(ts−t)^{1−γ}/(γ−1)}, H(t)=2 a0 n t/(a0 t^2+1)+(ts−t)^{−γ}."

    The load-bearing cosmic history is not solved from the f(Q,T) field equations (9)–(11). It is imported as a hybrid ansatz from Odintsov et al. [66], which was itself constructed to unify an asymmetric bounce with late dark energy. Bounce, asymmetry, and late acceleration are therefore properties of the cited ansatz, not outputs of non-metricity.

  2. self definitional [§III.A, Fig. 1 and surrounding text]
    "From the figure, it is evident that the Universe undergoes a non-singular bounce at t=−0.09, where the scale factor reaches its absolute minimum prior to changing from contracting to expanding. Furthermore, the Hubble parameter changes its sign at the bounce, confirming the occurrence of the matter bounce."

    H(t) is defined by differentiating the imposed a(t). The zero of that explicit H(t) at t≈−0.09 (for the chosen a0,n,γ,ts) is the bounce by definition. Reporting the sign flip of H as confirmation of a bounce is restating the input, not a dynamical result of f(Q,T).

3 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [§III.B, Eq. (14), Fig. 2]
    "The effective EoS parameter can be represented as ω_eff=−1−2Ḣ/(3H^2). ... The figure clearly illustrates three distinct cosmological regimes. ... at the present cosmic age, t≈13.8 Gyr, the effective EoS parameter approaches ω_eff≃−1."

    Eq. (14) is a purely kinematic identity fixed by H(t) and Ḣ(t) alone. It does not use f, f_Q, f_T, or the modified Friedmann equations. The entire early-time / decelerated / quintessence / phantom / ΛCDM narrative and the t≈13.8 Gyr result are therefore properties of the tuned hybrid ansatz, then attributed to the f(Q,T) model.

  2. self definitional [§III.C, Fig. 3]
    "An important feature of a bouncing cosmological model is that the Hubble parameter vanishes, H=0, at the bounce epoch... Consequently, the comoving Hubble radius, defined as r_h=1/(aH), diverges because the Hubble parameter at the bounce point becomes zero. This divergence is evident in the left panel of Fig. 3, confirming the characteristic behavior expected in nonsingular bouncing cosmologies."

    rh:=1/(aH) diverges iff H=0. Since H(tb)=0 was imposed by the ansatz, rh divergence is a definitional restatement of the bounce condition, not independent evidence that f(Q,T) realizes a bounce.

  3. fitted input called prediction [§IV–V, Eqs. (11a)–(11b), (15a–c), Figs. 4–5; Abstract/§VI]
    "Overall, the f(Q,T) gravity model, once reconstructed, effectively captures the cosmic dynamics surrounding the bounce. It offers a cohesive theoretical framework that reliably explains the Universe's evolution during both its early and late stages."

    With a(t)/H(t) fixed and seven free parameters (a0,γ,n,ts,κ,α,m) tuned for the plots, ρ and p are whatever the inverted field equations require to support that H(t). NEC violation near the bounce (15a) is then the consistency condition for the pre-chosen non-singular H, not a prediction that f(Q,T) selects a bounce. Framing this reconstruction as the model “reliably explaining” unified early+late evolution treats the fitted/imposed input history as an output of the theory.

full rationale

This is a standard reconstruction paper that is partially circular in its central phenomenological claims. The hybrid scale factor (13a–b), taken from Odintsov et al., is engineered so that H changes sign (bounce) and an exponential tail drives late acceleration. Differentiating that ansatz yields H(t); the kinematic formula ω_eff=−1−2Ḣ/(3H²) (Eq. 14) then produces the entire early/matter/quintessence/phantom narrative with no reference to f(Q,T). Comoving-Hubble divergence at the bounce is the tautology rh=1/(aH) with H=0. Parameter values (a0, γ, n, ts, κ, α, m) are chosen so plots show the intended epochs. What f(Q,T)=αQ^m+βT actually contributes is the back-solved ρ, p, ω=p/ρ and the NEC/SEC/DEC profiles needed to support the pre-chosen H(t)—genuine consistency content, not a derivation of the cosmic history. The Abstract/§VI claim that the reconstructed model “reliably explains” unified early+late evolution therefore overstates an input ansatz as a theory prediction. Score 6 (not 8–10): the paper repeatedly says “reconstructed,” does not hide the ansatz, and the modified-Friedmann inversion for ρ,p is real work.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing content is almost entirely ansatz + parameter choice on top of standard FLRW f(Q,T) phenomenology. No new field, particle, or symmetry is introduced. The hybrid scale factor and the seven-odd free numbers carry the phenomenology; the gravity function mainly labels the effective fluid.

free parameters (7)
  • a0 = 0.3
    Amplitude in the matter-bounce piece of the hybrid scale factor; set to 0.3 for all plots.
  • n = 0.185
    Exponent of the (a0 t^2+1) factor controlling bounce sharpness/matter-like piece; set to 0.185.
  • γ = 4/3
    Exponent in the exponential/dark-energy piece of a(t); set to 4/3.
  • ts = 30
    Time-scale parameter in the exponential factor; set to 30 (units not calibrated).
  • α = −0.5
    Coupling in f=α Q^m + β T; set to −0.5 for fluid and energy-condition plots.
  • m = 1 or 1.01
    Power of non-metricity; compared at 1 and 1.01 to illustrate nonlinear bumps.
  • κ (via β=8πκ=f_T) = −0.49975
    Matter-coupling parameter appearing in ρ,p; tuned to −0.49975, extremely close to −1/2.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Gravitational dynamics are given by f(Q,T) field equations from action (1), with Q the non-metricity scalar.
    §II adopts Xu et al. f(Q,T) as the working theory without independent derivation.
  • domain assumption Spacetime is flat FLRW with N=1 and a perfect fluid T^μ_ν=diag(−ρ,p,p,p).
    §II, Eqs. 6–8; standard cosmology assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The functional is exactly f(Q,T)=α Q^m + β T with constant α,β,m.
    §II after Eq. 10; one of many possible f(Q,T) forms, chosen for tractability.
  • ad hoc to paper Cosmic history is exactly the hybrid scale factor (13a), combining matter bounce and exponential expansion.
    §III.A; imported ansatz that forces bounce + late acceleration.
  • ad hoc to paper Effective EoS is ω_eff=−1−2Ḣ/(3H^2) even in f(Q,T).
    §III.B Eq. 14; GR kinematic definition used without modified-gravity re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Classical pointwise energy conditions on the effective perfect fluid diagnose bounce viability.
    §V Table I and Eqs. 15a–c; standard but not sufficient for full viability (perturbations omitted).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bouncing Cosmology and Cosmological Dynamics in $f(Q,T)$ Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K547TGDN

@misc{pith2026260726753,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bouncing Cosmology and Cosmological Dynamics in $f(Q,T)$ Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K547TGDN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26753}
}
abstract

We propose a reconstructed cosmological model in the framework of $f(Q,T)$ gravity, that provides a unified description of the early- and late-time evolution of the Universe. The model exhibits a non-singular asymmetric bounce, smoothly connecting an initial contracting phase to the subsequent expanding Universe and naturally evolving into a late-time dark energy-dominated epoch. Our study focuses on the progression of the Hubble parameter, energy density, pressure, and the parameter. This analysis aims to define the various stages of cosmic evolution and explore the characteristics of dark energy. The analysis of energy conditions reveals that the essential conditions for achieving a non-singular bounce are violated. Overall, the $f(Q, T)$ gravity model, once reconstructed, effectively captures the cosmic dynamics surrounding the bounce. It offers a cohesive theoretical framework that reliably explains the Universe's evolution during both its early and late stages.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26753 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Evolution of the scale factor and the Hubble parameter with cosmic time. The left and right panels represent the scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The effective parameter as functions of cosmic time for the chosen model parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The Comoving Hubble radius as functions of cosmic time for the chosen model parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the pressure, energy density, and EoS parameter as functions of cosmic time for the chosen model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The evolution of the NEC [left] , SEC [right] and DEC [bottom] are illustrated. The blue curve corresponds to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references

  1. [1]

    The general theory of relativity

    Albert Einstein. The general theory of relativity. InThe meaning of relativity, pages 54–75. Springer, 1922

    1922

  2. [2]

    Alan H. Guth. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems.Phys. Rev. D, 23:347–356, 1981

    1981

  3. [3]

    Sean M. Carroll. The cosmological constant.Liv. Rev. Rel., 4, 2001

    2001

  4. [4]

    OUP Oxford, 2008

    Steven Weinberg.Cosmology. OUP Oxford, 2008

    2008

  5. [5]

    A.D. Linde. A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems.Physics Letters B, 108(6):389–393, 1982

    1982

  6. [6]

    Primordial perturbations in a nonsingular bouncing universe model.Phys

    Patrick Peter and Nelson Pinto-Neto. Primordial perturbations in a nonsingular bouncing universe model.Phys. Rev. D, 66:063509, 2002

    2002

  7. [7]

    Saridakis

    Gabriel Farrugia, Jackson Levi Said, Viktor Gakis, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. Gravitational Waves in Modified Telepar- allel Theories.Phys. Rev. D, 97(12):124064, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    Riess, Alexei V

    Adam G. Riess, Alexei V. Filippenko, Peter Challis, Alejandro Clocchiatti, et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant.Astron. J., 116:1009–1038, 1998

    1998

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R. A. Knop, et al. Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 high redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J., 517:565–586, 1999. 10

    1999

  2. [10]

    The cosmoverse white paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics.Physics of the Dark Universe, 49:101965, 2025

    Eleonora Di Valentino et al. The cosmoverse white paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics.Physics of the Dark Universe, 49:101965, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Quantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics.Phys

    Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics.Phys. Rev. D, 74:084003, 2006

    2006

  4. [12]

    Odintsov and V.K

    S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou. Deformed matter bounce with dark energy epoch.Phys. Rev. D, 94(064022), 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Bouncing cosmology in modified gravity with higher-order gauss–bonnet curvature term.Universe, 8(12):636, 2022

    Santosh V Lohakare, Francisco Tello-Ortiz, SK Tripathy, and B Mishra. Bouncing cosmology in modified gravity with higher-order gauss–bonnet curvature term.Universe, 8(12):636, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Bouncing cosmology in extended gravity and its recon- struction as dark energy model.Fortschritte der Physik, 70(1):2100065, 2022

    AS Agrawal, Francisco Tello-Ortiz, B Mishra, and SK Tripathy. Bouncing cosmology in extended gravity and its recon- struction as dark energy model.Fortschritte der Physik, 70(1):2100065, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Comprehensive study of bouncing cosmological models inf(Q,T) theory.The European Physical Journal C, 84(8):802, 2024

    M Zeeshan Gul, M Sharif, and Shamraiza Shabbir. Comprehensive study of bouncing cosmological models inf(Q,T) theory.The European Physical Journal C, 84(8):802, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Bouncing universe in modified Gauss–Bonnet gravity.Chinese Journal of Physics, 84:371–380, 2023

    JK Singh, Kazuharu Bamba, et al. Bouncing universe in modified Gauss–Bonnet gravity.Chinese Journal of Physics, 84:371–380, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Bamba, A

    K. Bamba, A. N. Makarenko, A. N. Myagky, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov. Bounce cosmology fromF(R)gravity and F(R)bigravity.JCAP, 01(008), 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    Bouncing universe with quintom matter.JHEP, 2007:071, 2007

    Yi-Fu Cai, Taotao Qiu, Xinmin Zhang, Yun-Song Piao, and Mingzhe Li. Bouncing universe with quintom matter.JHEP, 2007:071, 2007

    2007

  11. [19]

    Shabani and A

    H. Shabani and A. H. Ziaie. Bouncing cosmological solutions fromf(R,T)gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 78:1–24, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Bouncing cosmology in modified Gauss–Bonnet gravity.Physics Letters B, 732:349–355, 2014

    Kazuharu Bamba, Andrey N Makarenko, Alexandr N Myagky, and Sergei D Odintsov. Bouncing cosmology in modified Gauss–Bonnet gravity.Physics Letters B, 732:349–355, 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    J. K. Singh, Harshna Balhara, Kazuharu Bamba, and J. Jena. Bouncing cosmology in modified gravity with higher-order curvature terms.JHEP, 2023:1–21, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Bouncing Cosmology in Interacting Scalar-Torsion Gravity.International Journal of Geo- metric Methods in Modern Physics, 2026

    SA Kadam and AS Agrawal. Bouncing Cosmology in Interacting Scalar-Torsion Gravity.International Journal of Geo- metric Methods in Modern Physics, 2026

    2026

  15. [23]

    Scalar field induced dynamical evolution in teleparallel gravity.Physics Letters B, 857:138968, 2024

    B Mishra, SA Kadam, and SK Tripathy. Scalar field induced dynamical evolution in teleparallel gravity.Physics Letters B, 857:138968, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Caruana, G

    M. Caruana, G. Farrugia, and J. L. Said. Cosmological bouncing solutions inf(T,B)gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80:640, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Cosmological bouncing solutions in extended teleparallel gravity theories.Phys

    ´Alvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz, Gabriel Farrugia, Jackson Levi Said, and Diego S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez. Cosmological bouncing solutions in extended teleparallel gravity theories.Phys. Rev. D, 97(10):104040, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    H. Weyl. Gravity and electricity.Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., 465:147–159, 1918

    1918

  19. [27]

    Gravitation and electricity

    A. Einstein. Supplement to Hermann Weyl “Gravitation and electricity”.Sitzungsberg. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., 478(1), 1918

    1918

  20. [28]

    E. Cartan. Spaces with affine connection and the theory of general relativity.Ann. Sc. Ec. Norm. Sup., 40:325–412, 1923

    1923

  21. [29]

    Weitzenb¨ ock

    R. Weitzenb¨ ock. Invariantentheorie, noordhoff, groningen.Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Library, 1923

    1923

  22. [30]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Riemannian geometry, while maintaining the notion of teleparallelism.Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., 17:217– 221, 1928

    1928

  23. [31]

    Tetrad fields and gravitational fields.Kgl

    C Pellegrini and J Plebanski. Tetrad fields and gravitational fields.Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat. Fys. Skrifter, 2, 1963

    1963

  24. [32]

    Nester and H-J

    J.M. Nester and H-J. Yo. Symmetric teleparallel general relativity.Chin. J. Phys., 37(113), 1999

    1999

  25. [33]

    Power-law cosmology in weyl-type f (q, t) gravity.The European Physical Journal Plus, 136(10):1040, 2021

    Gaurav Gadbail, Simran Arora, and PK Sahoo. Power-law cosmology in weyl-type f (q, t) gravity.The European Physical Journal Plus, 136(10):1040, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Coincident general relativity.Physical Review D, 98(4):044048, 2018

    Jose Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, Lavinia Heisenberg, and Tomi Koivisto. Coincident general relativity.Physical Review D, 98(4):044048, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Y. Xu, G. Li, T. Harko, and S-D. Liang.f(Q,T)gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79:1–19, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    J. Lu, X. Zhao, and G. Chee. Cosmology in symmetric teleparallel gravity and its dynamical system.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(530), 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    K. F. Dialektopoulos, T. S. Koivisto, and S. Capozziello. Noether symmetries in symmetric teleparallel cosmology.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(606), 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Bajardi, D

    F. Bajardi, D. Vernieri, and S. Capozziello. Bouncing cosmology inf(Q)symmetric teleparallel gravity.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135(912), 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    J. B. Jimenez, L. Heisenberg, T. Koivisto, and S. Pekar. Cosmology inf(Q)geometry.Phys. Rev. D, 101(103507), 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Wu and H.W

    P. Wu and H.W. Yu. The dynamical behavior off(T)theory.Phys. Lett. B, 692(176), 2010

    2010

  33. [41]

    B. Li, T. P. Sotiriou, and J. D. Barrow.f(T)gravity and local Lorentz invariance.Phys. Rev. D, 83(064035), 2011

    2011

  34. [42]

    Y. F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, and E.N. Saridakis.f(T)teleparallel gravity and cosmology.Rep. Prog. Phys., 79:106901, 2016

    2016

  35. [43]

    Benetti, S

    M. Benetti, S. Capozziello, and G. Lambiase. Updating constraints onf(T)teleparallel cosmology and the consistency with big bang nucleosynthesis.MNRAS, 500(1795), 2021. 11

    2021

  36. [44]

    Golovnev and T

    A. Golovnev and T. Koivisto. Cosmological perturbations in modified teleparallel gravity models.JCAP, 11(012), 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    Frusciante

    N. Frusciante. Signatures off(Q)gravity in cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 103(044021), 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    A. D. Latorre, G. J. Olmo, and M. Ronco. Observable traces of non-metricity: New constraints on metric-affine gravity. Phys. Lett. B, 780(294), 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Soudi, G

    I. Soudi, G. Farrugia, J.L. Said, V. Gakis, and E.N. Saridakis. Polarization of gravitational waves in symmetric teleparallel theories of gravity and their modifications.Phys. Rev. D, 100(044008), 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    Zia, D.C

    R. Zia, D.C. Maurya, and A.K. Shukla. Transit cosmological models in modifiedf(Q,T)gravity.IJGMMP, 18(2150051), 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    L. Pati, B. Mishra, and S.K. Tripathy. Model parameters in the context of late time cosmic acceleration inf(Q,T)gravity. Phys. Scr., 96(10), 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    Intricacies of cosmological bounce in polynomial metric f(r) gravity for flat flrw spacetime.JCAP, 2016(02):030, 2016

    Kaushik Bhattacharya and Saikat Chakrabarty. Intricacies of cosmological bounce in polynomial metric f(r) gravity for flat flrw spacetime.JCAP, 2016(02):030, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Saridakis, Shreya Banerjee, and R

    Emmanuel N. Saridakis, Shreya Banerjee, and R. Myrzakulov. Bounce and cyclic cosmology in new gravitational scalar- tensor theories.Phys. Rev. D, 98:063513, 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Bounce cosmology inf(R)gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 81(2):160, 2021

    M Ilyas and WU Rahman. Bounce cosmology inf(R)gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 81(2):160, 2021

    2021

  45. [53]

    Mishra, G

    B. Mishra, G. Ribeiro, and P.H.R.S. Moraes. De Sitter and bounce solutions from anisotropy in extended gravity cosmology. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 34(1950321), 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    Tripathy, B

    S.K. Tripathy, B. Mishra, S. Ray, and R. Sengupta. Bouncing universe models in an extended gravity theory.Chin. J. Phys., 71(610), 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Elizalde, S.D

    E. Elizalde, S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou, and Tanmoy Paul. Extended matter bounce scenario in ghost-freef(R,G) gravity compatible with GW170817.Nuclear Physics B, 954:114984, 2020

    2020

  48. [56]

    P. H. Logbo and M. J. S. Houndjo. Type IV singular bouncing cosmology fromf(T)gravity.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 28:1950147, 2019

    2019

  49. [57]

    Bouncing solutions inf(T)gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 80(11):1054, 2020

    Maria A Skugoreva and Alexey V Toporensky. Bouncing solutions inf(T)gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 80(11):1054, 2020

    2020

  50. [58]

    Agrawal, Laxmipriya Pati, S.K

    A.S. Agrawal, Laxmipriya Pati, S.K. Tripathy, and B. Mishra. Matter bounce scenario and the dynamical aspects in f(Q,T)gravity.Physics of the Dark Universe, 33, 2021

    2021

  51. [59]

    Gravastars inf(R,G,T)gravity.Canadian Journal of Physics, 102(6):332–343, 2024

    Muhammad Ilyas. Gravastars inf(R,G,T)gravity.Canadian Journal of Physics, 102(6):332–343, 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    Novello and S

    M. Novello and S. E. Perez Bergliaffa. Bouncing cosmologies.Phys. Rept., 463:127–213, 2008

    2008

  53. [61]

    Battefeld and Patrick Peter

    D. Battefeld and Patrick Peter. A critical review of classical bouncing cosmologies.Phys. Rept., 571:1–66, 2015

    2015

  54. [62]

    Obtaining the CMB anomalies with a bounce from the contracting phase to inflation.Phys

    Zhi-Guo Liu, Zong-Kuan Guo, and Yun-Song Piao. Obtaining the CMB anomalies with a bounce from the contracting phase to inflation.Phys. Rev. D, 88(6), 2013

    2013

  55. [63]

    Boisseau, H

    B. Boisseau, H. Giacomini, D. Polarski, and A.A. Starobinsky. Bouncing universes in scalar-tensor gravity models admitting negative potentials.JCAP, 2015:002, 2015

    2015

  56. [64]

    Constraining the cosmological model using recent observational data.Chinese Physics C, 47(11):115107, 2023

    N Myrzakulov, M Koussour, Alnadhief HA Alfedeel, and EI Hassan. Constraining the cosmological model using recent observational data.Chinese Physics C, 47(11):115107, 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    Effects of matter lagrangian inf(Q,T)gravity: The accelerating cosmological model.Annalen der Physik, 538(3):e00001, 2026

    Rahul Bhagat, IV Fomin, and B Mishra. Effects of matter lagrangian inf(Q,T)gravity: The accelerating cosmological model.Annalen der Physik, 538(3):e00001, 2026

    2026

  58. [66]

    Odintsov et al

    Sergei D. Odintsov et al. Unifying an asymmetric bounce to the dark energy in Chern–SimonsF(R)gravity.Physics of the Dark Universe, 33:100864, 2021

    2021

  59. [67]

    Bottom-up reconstruction of non-singular bounce inF(R) gravity from observational indices.Nuclear Physics B, 959:115159, 2020

    Sergei D Odintsov, Vasilis K Oikonomou, and Tanmoy Paul. Bottom-up reconstruction of non-singular bounce inF(R) gravity from observational indices.Nuclear Physics B, 959:115159, 2020

    2020

  60. [68]

    Dynamics of quasi-de sitter and linear combination of exponential models in extended gravity.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 18(11):2150168, 2021

    B Mishra, Eesha Gadia, and SK Tripathy. Dynamics of quasi-de sitter and linear combination of exponential models in extended gravity.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 18(11):2150168, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.