Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 69 references

PSR J1856–0039 is a new double neutron star system whose measured orbital decay matches general relativity and whose total mass is the lowest yet seen.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:18 UTC pith:SJMDWUHM

load-bearing objection A new double neutron star with the lowest known total mass; the GR consistency claim holds up, and the distance caveat does not bite at current precision. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27333 v1 pith:SJMDWUHM submitted 2026-07-29 astro-ph.HE

Relativistic effects of PSR~J1856--0039 double neutron star system in a 2.36-hour compact orbit

Z. L. Yang , J. L. Han , W. Q. Su , P. F. Wang , C. Wang , T. Wang , D. J. Zhou , Yi Yan
show 6 more authors
J. Xu W. C. Jing N. N. Cai R. X. Xu H. G. Wang X. P. You
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords double neutron starpulsar timingpost-Keplerian parametersgeneral relativity testsgravitational-wave orbital decayneutron star massesframe-dragging precessionbinary pulsar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports a newly discovered double neutron star system, PSR J1856–0039, and argues from radio timing observations that it is the lightest such system known, with a total mass of 2.48841 ± 0.00015 M_sun. The two neutron stars, at 1.304 and 1.185 M_sun, orbit every 2.36 hours in a mildly eccentric orbit. The authors measure three relativistic effects—periastron advance, orbital decay, and a relativistic time delay—and show they are mutually consistent with general relativity; in particular, the observed gravitational-wave-driven orbital decay matches the GR prediction to 1.009 ± 0.014. The consequence is a new test bed for gravitational theories and a rare low-mass data point for how double neutron stars form, merge, and leave remnants.

Core claim

The central discovery is that PSR J1856–0039 is a genuine double neutron star system, the lightest found so far, and that its timing behavior obeys general relativity. With a spin period of 23.4 ms and an orbital period of 2.36 hours, the pulsar's timing yields three post-Keplerian parameters—timing effects that go beyond a Newtonian orbit. Fitting them with a general-relativistic binary model gives a total mass of 2.48841 ± 0.00015 M_sun, containing a 1.304 ± 0.022 M_sun pulsar and a 1.185 ± 0.022 M_sun companion, one of the lowest neutron-star masses on record. The observed orbital decay minus the GR prediction is (−1.2 ± 1.8) × 10⁻¹⁴ s/s, so the observed and predicted decay agree at 1.009

What carries the argument

The paper's load-bearing tool is the set of post-Keplerian timing parameters—rate of periastron advance, orbital period derivative, and relativistic time delay—each of which general relativity predicts as a function of the two masses. Because all three must be satisfied simultaneously, their curves in the mass–mass plane must intersect at one point; that intersection fixes the pulsar mass, the companion mass, and the total mass. The same model then separates the observed orbital decay into a gravitational-wave component and small kinematic corrections, allowing a direct comparison of measured and predicted gravitational-wave-driven decay.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the observed orbital decay is dominated by gravitational-wave emission, with only negligible kinematic corrections, rests on the assumed distance of 1.3–2.0 kpc from electron-density models; if the true distance were much larger, the proper-motion and Galactic-acceleration corrections could rival the quoted excess and change the GR agreement.

What would settle it

Measure the pulsar's parallax (e.g., through long-term timing or very long baseline interferometry) and find a distance well above the assumed 1.3–2.0 kpc; then recompute the proper-motion and Galactic-acceleration corrections to the orbital period derivative. If those terms become comparable to the measured excess, the claimed 1.009 agreement would no longer be a clean confirmation of general relativity.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The system's total mass of 2.488 M_sun becomes the lowest known anchor for double neutron star populations, placing the companion near the theoretical minimum neutron star mass.
  • Orbital decay will bring the two neutron stars together in roughly 82 million years; if the merger remnant survives as a neutron star, it will be a low-mass end member of merger-remnant demographics.
  • The measured ratio of observed to predicted gravitational-wave orbital decay, 1.009 ± 0.014, will tighten with longer timing baselines, making the system a continuing test of general relativity in strong gravity.
  • Because the orbit is short and inclined, continued monitoring has a concrete chance to detect frame-dragging precession, which would yield constraints on the neutron star's moment of inertia.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct distance measurement—via timing parallax or very long baseline interferometry—would test the paper's assumption that kinematic corrections to the orbital decay are negligible; a distance several times the model estimates would shift the GR consistency ratio.
  • The companion mass near 1.185 M_sun sits at the predicted lower edge of neutron star masses from supernova theory, so the system offers a clean test of formation channels if the rate of similar low-mass systems can be estimated.
  • If the merger remnant is a stable neutron star, its inferred gravitational mass of roughly 2.26 M_sun would sit near current upper bounds, making this system a useful prior for interpreting future gravitational-wave events with low chirp mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery and timing analysis of PSR J1856–0039, a 23.4-ms pulsar in a compact 2.36-hour eccentric orbit discovered in FAST GPPS survey data. Using 253 TOAs from 17 sessions, the authors obtain a phase-connected timing solution with 5.82 μs RMS residuals. They measure three post-Keplerian parameters: periastron advance ωdot = 17.5859(7) deg/yr, Einstein delay γ = 0.445(11) ms, and orbital period derivative Pdot = -1.284(19)×10^-12 s/s. Applying the DDGR model, they derive total mass M_tot = 2.48841(15) Msun, pulsar mass M_p = 1.304(22) Msun, and companion mass M_c = 1.185(22) Msun, claiming the lowest total mass of any known DNS. They report a GR consistency ratio Pdot_GW_obs/Pdot_GW_pred = 1.009(14), a merger timescale of 82 Myr, and discuss future Lense-Thirring precession measurements.

Significance. If correct, this is an important discovery: the system would be the least massive double neutron star known, with a low-mass companion near the lower limit expected from supernova simulations. The system provides a valuable data point for DNS formation and merger-remnant studies, and its short orbital period makes it a promising target for future tests of spin-orbit coupling. The timing analysis follows standard practice, the residual RMS is small, and the authors explicitly consider kinematic corrections. The paper also includes a simulation of future measurement precision, which is useful. The main caveat is that the headline GR test ratio is produced by a GR-constrained fit, so its interpretation needs careful framing.

major comments (1)
  1. [Relativistic effects and mass measurements; abstract] The ratio Pdot_GW_obs/Pdot_GW_pred = 1.009(14) is obtained using the DDGR timing model, which assumes general relativity and fits masses and Pdot simultaneously. The abstract's phrasing 'observed orbital decay ... and the orbital decay predicted by general relativity ... are consistent' and the sentence 'This result validates general relativity' could mislead readers into thinking this is an independent out-of-sample test. The actual independent check is the mutual consistency of the three PK parameters measured in the DD model, shown in Fig. 3. Please either compute the ratio using the DD-measured Pdot and masses derived from ωdot and γ alone, or explicitly state that 1.009(14) is a residual from a GR-constrained fit and present Fig. 3 as the primary GR test. This distinction is central to the paper's main claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table III vs. text] The orbital inclination is given as i = 133.2±1.1 deg in the text and Table II, but Table III lists i = 46.8±1.1 deg for PSR J1856–0039. Since cot i appears in Eq. (6) with opposite sign for supplementary angles, please clarify the convention and ensure consistency.
  2. [Footnote [51]] The claim that ωdot_LT and ωdot_2PN cancel in the DDGR leading-order model is stated without a reference or quantitative justification. Please provide a calculation or a citation, and quantify the residual if the cancellation is only approximate. The current statement is too strong, even if the residual is expected to be smaller than the measurement uncertainty.
  3. [After Eq. (2)] The kinematic correction to Pdot is said to be ~1×10^-15 s/s based on distances of 1.3–2.0 kpc. To make the robustness clear, please show the scaling with distance and the uncertainty from electron-density models, e.g., the Shklovskii term at 5 kpc. This would address the main distance-related concern for the Pdot comparison.
  4. [Derived parameters in Table II] The masses quoted in Table II are from the DDGR fit. Please also report the masses obtained from the independent DD-model constraints (e.g., the intersection of ωdot and γ) so that the model dependence of the mass measurement is explicit. The mass-mass diagram indicates the values but does not give numbers.
  5. [Data availability] No statement is given about public availability of TOAs or timing residuals. A data-release statement or a note that data are available upon reasonable request would strengthen the paper's reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; the DDGR Pdot ratio is a fitted self-consistency residual, while the independent mass–mass intersection carries the GR test.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Section 'Relativistic effects and mass measurements' after Eq. (3); Table II notes]
    "Ṗ^GW_orb,obs − Ṗ^GW_orb,pred is constrained to (−1.2±1.8)×10−14 s s−1 using the DGR binary model, which assumes the validity of general relativity [49, 50]. This result validates general relativity at a level of Ṗ^GW_orb,obs/Ṗ^GW_orb,pred = 1.009±0.014."

    Table II states 'M_c, M_p, and excess P_dot are fitted using DDGR model.' The denominator P_dot^GW_orb,pred is therefore computed from masses obtained in a GR-assuming fit that also fits the residual between observed and predicted P_dot as a free parameter. The reported ratio 1.009(14) is thus the fitted residual normalized by the GR prediction, not an independent out-of-sample prediction. This is a self-consistency statistic rather than a separate test. It is not load-bearing because the DD-model mass–mass diagram (Fig. 3), built from separately measured ωdot, γ, and P_dot, is the actual independent GR test.

full rationale

The discovery claim and all raw measurements (P_dot, ωdot, γ, masses) come from FAST timing data, so the paper is data-driven. The 'lowest total mass' claim is an observational comparison with external pulsar catalogs and is not produced by fitting to that claim. The main GR test is the DD-model mass–mass diagram (Fig. 3): the 1σ bands of three separately measured post-Keplerian parameters intersect, which is a nontrivial consistency test of GR's functional relations. The DDGR-based ratio quoted in the abstract is partially circular as noted, but it is a supporting statistic, not the central derivation. The distance-dependent kinematic corrections (Shklovskii and Galactic acceleration) are estimated at ~1e-15 s/s at 1.3–2.0 kpc, well below the quoted P_dot error of 1.9e-14 s/s; even several-kpc distance errors would not change the GR ratio beyond errors. Footnote [51] asserts without derivation that ωdot_LT and ωdot_2PN cancel, but this is a correctness/robustness caveat, not a circularity. Self-citations are limited to survey/data-provenance and do not carry the theoretical load; the GR formulas and timing codes are standard external tools. Overall, no load-bearing circularity is found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or forces. Its central results rest on standard GR interpretations of measured PK parameters, plus a model-dependent distance estimate for kinematic corrections. The free parameters are the fitted timing quanties; none are ad hoc beyond the normal timing-model degrees of freedom.

free parameters (4)
  • Post-Keplerian parameters (ωdot, γ, Pdot_orb) = 17.5859(7) deg/yr, 0.445(11) ms, -1.284(19)e-12 s/s
    Fitted to 253 TOAs in the DD timing model; these data-derived quantities are the inputs for mass determination and the GR test.
  • Excess orbital period derivative (PBDOT_excess) = -1.2(18)e-14 s/s
    Fitted residual in DDGR between observed and GR-predicted Pdot_orb; this parameter directly measures the GR consistency ratio 1.009(14).
  • Pulsar mass M_p = 1.304(22) M_sun
    Derived from DDGR fit using the three PK parameters under the assumption of GR.
  • Companion mass M_c = 1.185(22) M_sun
    Derived similarly; a central result (one of the lowest NS masses).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption General relativity (leading-order post-Newtonian) correctly describes orbital dynamics and gravitational-wave damping in this binary.
    Used to convert ωdot, γ, and Pdot_orb into masses (Eq. 3) and in the DDGR model; the paper's GR test checks the self-consistency of this assumption, but the mass values are not model-independent.
  • domain assumption The distance to PSR J1856–0039 is 1.3–2.0 kpc (from NE2025/YMW16 electron-density models), making kinematic corrections to Pdot_orb of order 1e-15 s/s negligible.
    If the true distance were much larger, Shklovskii and Galactic acceleration terms could shift the excess Pdot at the 1e-14 level, affecting the GR test.
  • domain assumption The binary is isolated; no third body, unmodeled aberration, or profile evolution contaminates the timing at the level relevant to the PK parameter measurements.
    The timing model assumes a clean isolated two-body plus standard pulsar spin-down; the 5.82 μs RMS supports this, but unmodeled effects would bias the PK parameters.
  • domain assumption The companion is a neutron star.
    The companion mass of 1.185 Mo and the recycled pulsar spin place it in the DNS category; this is the premise for calling the system a DNS and for the 'one of the lowest NS masses' claim.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 15887 in / 23630 out tokens · 240352 ms · 2026-08-01T09:18:11.613924+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Compact double neutron star (DNS) systems are unique laboratories for testing gravitational theories and studying DNS mergers. Here we report the properties of a new DNS system, PSR J1856--0039, discovered in the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST). The pulsar is mildly recycled with a period of 23.4~ms in a compact eccentric orbit ($e=0.106$) with an orbital period of 2.36 hours. By following up FAST observations, we measured the relativistic effects, including the orbital period derivative $\dot{P}_{\rm orb}=-1.284\pm0.019\times10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$, periastron advance $\dot\omega=17.5859\pm0.0007$ deg yr$^{-1}$, and Einstein delay $\gamma=0.445\pm0.011$ ms. This DNS system has a low orbital inclination of $i=133^\circ.2\pm1^\circ.1$ and the lowest total mass of any known DNS, $M_{\rm tot}=2.48841\pm0.00015 M\odot$, with a determined pulsar mass of $1.304\pm0.022 M_\odot$ and a companion mass of $1.185\pm0.022 M_\odot$, one of the lowest neutron-star masses. The observed orbital decay due to gravitational-wave emission $\dot{P}^{\rm GW}_{\rm orb,obs}$ and the orbital decay predicted by general relativity $\dot{P}^{\rm GW}_{\rm orb,pred}$ are consistent at a level of $\dot{P}^{\rm GW}_{\rm orb,obs}/\dot{P}^{\rm GW}_{\rm orb,pred}=$1.009(14) (68% confidence). This DNS will merge after 82 Myr and may form a stable neutron star or collapse into a black hole after spin-down. Long-term monitoring could potentially probe the Lense-Thirring precession.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27333 by C. Wang, D. J. Zhou, H. G. Wang, J. L. Han, J. Xu, N. N. Cai, P. F. Wang, R. X. Xu, T. Wang, W. C. Jing, W. Q. Su, X. P. You, Yi Yan, Z. L. Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Polarization profiles of PSR J1856–0039 observed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Timing residuals of PSR J1856–0039. The weighted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The total masses of DNS systems versus individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and M. Hobbs, The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Cat- alogue, AJ129, 1993 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0412641 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system., ApJ195, L51 (1975)

    1975

  3. [3]

    J. H. Taylor, L. A. Fowler, and P. M. McCulloch, Mea- surements of general relativistic effects in the binary pul- sar PSR1913 + 16, Nature277, 437 (1979)

    1979

  4. [4]

    J. M. Weisberg and Y. Huang, Relativistic Measurements from Timing the Binary Pulsar PSR B1913+16, ApJ 829, 55 (2016), arXiv:1606.02744 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Kramer, I

    M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, N. Wex, A. T. Deller, W. A. Coles, M. Ali, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, I. Cognard, T. Damour, G. Desvignes, R. D. Ferdman, P. C. C. Freire, S. Grondin, L. Guillemot, G. B. Hobbs, G. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, D. R. Lorimer, A. G. Lyne, J. W. McKee, M. McLaughlin, L. E. M¨ unch, B. B. P. Perera, N. Pol, A. Possenti, J. Sa...

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, and et al., GW170817: Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, and et al., GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼3.4 M ⊙, ApJ892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Burgay, N

    M. Burgay, N. D’Amico, A. Possenti, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, B. C. Joshi, M. A. McLaughlin, M. Kramer, J. M. Sarkissian, F. Camilo, V. Kalogera, C. Kim, and D. R. Lorimer, An increased estimate of the merger rate of double neutron stars from observations of a highly relativistic system, Nature426, 531 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0312071 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    N. Pol, M. McLaughlin, and D. R. Lorimer, Future Prospects for Ground-based Gravitational-wave Detec- tors: The Galactic Double Neutron Star Merger Rate Revisited, ApJ870, 71 (2019), arXiv:1811.04086 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Sarin and P

    N. Sarin and P. D. Lasky, The evolution of binary neu- tron star post-merger remnants: a review, General Rel- ativity and Gravitation53, 59 (2021), arXiv:2012.08172 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    P. C. C. Freire and N. Wex, Gravity experiments with radio pulsars, Living Reviews in Relativity27, 5 (2024), arXiv:2407.16540 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Nan, Five hundred meter aperture spherical radio tele- scope (F AST), Science in China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy49, 129 (2006)

    R. Nan, Five hundred meter aperture spherical radio tele- scope (F AST), Science in China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy49, 129 (2006)

    2006

  13. [13]

    R. Nan, D. Li, C. Jin, Q. Wang, L. Zhu, W. Zhu, H. Zhang, Y. Yue, and L. Qian, The Five-Hundred Aper- ture Spherical Radio Telescope (fast) Project, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D20, 989 (2011), arXiv:1105.3794 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    J. L. Han, C. Wang,et al., The F AST Galactic Plane Pul- sar Snapshot survey: I. Project design and pulsar discov- eries, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics21, 107 (2021), arXiv:2105.08460 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    J. L. Han, D. J. Zhou, C. Wang, W. Q. Su, Y. Yan, W. C. Jing, Z. L. Yang, P. F. Wang, T. Wang, J. Xu, and et al., The F AST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot Survey. VI. The Discovery of 473 New Pulsars, Re- search in Astronomy and Astrophysics25, 014001 (2025), arXiv:2411.15961 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    W. Q. Su, J. L. Han, Z. L. Yang, P. F. Wang, J. P. Yuan, C. Wang, D. J. Zhou, T. Wang, Y. Yan, W. C. Jing, and et al., The F AST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snap- shot Survey - V. PSR J1901+0658 in a double neutron star system, MNRAS530, 1506 (2024), arXiv:2403.11635 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    P. F. Wang, J. L. Han, Z. L. Yang, T. Wang, C. Wang, W. Q. Su, J. Xu, D. J. Zhou, Y. Yan, W. C. Jing, N. N. Cai, J. P. Yuan, R. X. Xu, H. G. Wang, and X. P. You, The fast galactic plane pulsar snapshot survey. viii. 116 binary pulsars, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 25, 014003 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Z. L. Yang, J. L. Han, P. F. Wang, C. Wang, N. N. Cai, W. C. Jing, W. Q. Su, T. Wang, J. Xu, Y. Yan, and D. J. Zhou, Mass Measurements of the Double Neutron Star System PSR J0641+0448, ApJ1000, L1 (2026), arXiv:2603.10788 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    P. C. Freire, M. Kramer, and A. G. Lyne, Determination of the orbital parameters of binary pulsars, MNRAS322, 885 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010463 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Bhattacharyya and R

    B. Bhattacharyya and R. Nityananda, Determination of the orbital parameters of binary pulsars, MNRAS387, 273 (2008), arXiv:0803.1907 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    van Straten and M

    W. van Straten and M. Bailes, DSPSR: Digital Signal Processing Software for Pulsar Astronomy, PASA28, 1 8 (2011), arXiv:1008.3973 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    A. W. Hotan, W. van Straten, and R. N. Manchester, PSRCHIVE and PSRFITS: An Open Approach to Radio Pulsar Data Storage and Analysis, PASA21, 302 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404549 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    Jiang, N.-Y

    P. Jiang, N.-Y. Tang, L.-G. Hou, M.-T. Liu, M. Krˇ co, L. Qian, J.-H. Sun, T.-C. Ching, B. Liu, Y. Duan, Y.-L. Yue, H.-Q. Gan, R. Yao, H. Li, G.-F. Pan, D.-J. Yu, H.- F. Liu, D. Li, B. Peng, J. Yan, and F AST Collaboration, The fundamental performance of F AST with 19-beam receiver at L band, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics20, 064 (2020), arXiv:2...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    G. B. Hobbs, R. T. Edwards, and R. N. Manchester, TEMPO2, a new pulsar-timing package - I. An overview, MNRAS369, 655 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603381 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    P. C. C. Freire and A. Ridolfi, An algorithm for deter- mining the rotation count of pulsars, MNRAS476, 4794 (2018), arXiv:1802.07211 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Sotomayor-Beltran, C

    C. Sotomayor-Beltran, C. Sobey, J. W. T. Hessels, G. de Bruyn, A. Noutsos, A. Alexov, J. Anderson, A. Asgekar, I. M. Avruch, R. Beck, M. E. Bell, M. R. Bell, M. J. Bentum, G. Bernardi, P. Best, L. Birzan, A. Bonafede, F. Breitling, J. Broderick, W. N. Brouw, M. Br¨ uggen, B. Ciardi, F. de Gasperin, R. J. Dettmar, A. van Duin, S. Duscha, J. Eisl¨ offel, H....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    van Straten, Radio Astronomical Polarimetry and High-Precision Pulsar Timing, ApJ642, 1004 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0510334 [astro-ph]

    W. van Straten, Radio Astronomical Polarimetry and High-Precision Pulsar Timing, ApJ642, 1004 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0510334 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, General relativistic celestial mechanics of binary systems. I. The post-Newtonian mo- tion., Annales de L’Institut Henri Poincare Section (A) Physique Theorique43, 107 (1985)

    1985

  29. [29]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, General relativistic celes- tial mechanics of binary systems. II. The post-Newtonian timing formula., Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor 44, 263 (1986)

    1986

  30. [30]

    R. S. Park, W. M. Folkner, J. G. Williams, and D. H. Boggs, The JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE440 and DE441, AJ161, 105 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    T. M. Tauris, M. Kramer, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, H. T. Janka, N. Langer, P. Podsiadlowski, E. Bozzo, S. Chaty, M. U. Kruckow, E. P. J. van den Heuvel, J. An- toniadis, R. P. Breton, and D. J. Champion, Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems, ApJ846, 170 (2017), arXiv:1706.09438 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    R. D. Ferdman, I. H. Stairs, M. Kramer, G. H. Janssen, C. G. Bassa, B. W. Stappers, P. B. Demorest, I. Cognard, G. Desvignes, G. Theureau, and et al., PSR J1756-2251: a pulsar with a low-mass neutron star companion, MN- RAS443, 2183 (2014), arXiv:1406.5507 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Fonseca, I

    E. Fonseca, I. H. Stairs, and S. E. Thorsett, A Com- prehensive Study of Relativistic Gravity Using PSR B1534+12, ApJ787, 82 (2014), arXiv:1402.4836 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    J. G. Martinez, K. Stovall, P. C. C. Freire, J. S. Deneva, F. A. Jenet, M. A. McLaughlin, M. Bagchi, S. D. Bates, and A. Ridolfi, Pulsar J0453+1559: A Double Neutron Star System with a Large Mass Asymmetry, ApJ812, 143 (2015), arXiv:1509.08805 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    J. K. Swiggum, R. Rosen, M. A. McLaughlin, D. R. Lorimer, S. Heatherly, R. Lynch, S. Scoles, T. Hockett, E. Filik, J. A. Marlowe, and et al., PSR J1930-1852: a Pulsar in the Widest Known Orbit around Another Neu- tron Star, ApJ805, 156 (2015), arXiv:1503.06276 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    J. G. Martinez, K. Stovall, P. C. C. Freire, J. S. Deneva, T. M. Tauris, A. Ridolfi, N. Wex, F. A. Jenet, M. A. McLaughlin, and M. Bagchi, Pulsar J1411+2551: A Low- mass Double Neutron Star System, ApJ851, L29 (2017), arXiv:1711.09804 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    R. D. Ferdman, P. C. C. Freire, B. B. P. Perera, N. Pol, F. Camilo, S. Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, F. Crawford, J. W. T. Hessels, V. M. Kaspi, M. A. McLaughlin, E. Par- ent, I. H. Stairs, and J. van Leeuwen, Asymmetric mass ratios for bright double neutron-star mergers, Nature 583, 211 (2020), arXiv:2007.04175 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    H. T. Haniewicz, R. D. Ferdman, P. C. C. Freire, D. J. Champion, K. A. Bunting, D. R. Lorimer, and M. A. McLaughlin, Precise mass measurements for the dou- ble neutron star system J1829+2456, MNRAS500, 4620 (2021), arXiv:2007.07565 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Sengar, V

    R. Sengar, V. Balakrishnan, S. Stevenson, M. Bailes, E. D. Barr, N. D. R. Bhat, M. Burgay, M. C. i. Bernadich, A. D. Cameron, D. J. Champion, and et al., The High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey - XVII. PSR J1325-6253, a low eccentricity double neutron star system from an ultra-stripped supernova, MNRAS512, 5782 (2022), arXiv:2204.06869 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    A. D. Cameron, M. Bailes, D. J. Champion, P. C. C. Freire, M. Kramer, M. A. McLaughlin, C. Ng, A. Pos- senti, A. Ridolfi, T. M. Tauris, H. M. Wahl, and N. Wex, New constraints on the kinematic, relativistic, and evolu- tionary properties of the PSR J1757-1854 double neutron star system, MNRAS523, 5064 (2023), arXiv:2305.14733 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Colom i Bernadich, V

    M. Colom i Bernadich, V. Balakrishnan, E. Barr, M. Berezina, M. Burgay, S. Buchner, D. J. Champion, W. Chen, G. Desvignes, P. C. C. Freire, and et al., The MPIfR-MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey. II. The eccen- tric double neutron star system PSR J1208–5936 and a neutron star merger rate update, A&A678, A187 (2023), arXiv:2308.16802 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    A. E. McEwen, J. K. Swiggum, D. L. Kaplan, C. M. Tan, B. W. Meyers, E. Fonseca, G. Y. Agazie, P. Chawla, K. Crowter, M. E. DeCesar, T. Dolch, F. A. Dong, W. Fiore, E. Fonseca, D. C. Good, A. G. Istrate, V. M. Kaspi, V. I. Kondratiev, J. van Leeuwen, L. Levin, E. F. Lewis, R. S. Lynch, K. W. Masui, J. W. McKee, M. A. McLaughlin, H. Al Noori, E. Parent, S. ...

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    C. M. Tan, E. Fonseca, K. Crowter, F. A. Dong, V. M. Kaspi, K. W. Masui, J. W. McKee, B. W. Meyers, S. M. Ransom, and I. H. Stairs, High-cadence Timing of Binary Pulsars with CHIME, ApJ966, 26 (2024), arXiv:2402.08188 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    D. Zhao, N. Wang, J. P. Yuan, D. Li, P. Wang, M. Y. Xue, W. W. Zhu, C. C. Miao, W. M. Yan, J. B. Wang, and et al., A Relativistic Double Neutron Star Binary PSR J1846-0513, ApJ964, L7 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    L. Meng, P. C. C. Freire, K. Stovall, N. Wex, X. Miao, W. Zhu, M. Kramer, J. M. Cordes, H. Hu, J. Jiang, E. Parent, L. Shao, I. H. Stairs, M. Xue, A. Brazier, F. Camilo, D. J. Champion, S. Chatterjee, F. Crawford, Z. Fang, Q. Fu, Y. Guo, J. W. T. Hessels, M. MacLaugh- lin, C. Miao, J. Niu, Z. Wu, J. Yao, M. Yuan, Y. Yue, and C. Zhang, The double neutron s...

    arXiv 2052

  46. [46]

    I. S. Shklovskii, Possible Causes of the Secular Increase in Pulsar Periods., SvA13, 562 (1970)

    1970

  47. [47]

    S. K. Ocker and J. M. Cordes, NE2025: An Up- dated Electron Density Model for the Galactic Interstel- lar Medium, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.11838 (2026), arXiv:2602.11838 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    J. M. Yao, R. N. Manchester, and N. Wang, A New Electron-density Model for Estimation of Pulsar and FRB Distances, ApJ835, 29 (2017), arXiv:1610.09448 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    J. H. Taylor, Astronomical and space experiments to test relativity., inGeneral Relativity and Gravitation, edited by M. A. H. MacCallum (Cambridge University Press,

  50. [50]

    J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, Further Experimen- tal Tests of Relativistic Gravity Using the Binary Pulsar PSR 1913+16, ApJ345, 434 (1989)

    1913

  51. [51]

    The DDGR model only accounts for the leading-order terms of the post-Keplerian parameters, which is cur- rently enough accurate because ˙ωL Tand ˙ω2PN cancel out each other ( ˙ωL T+ ˙ω2PN ≪σ ˙ω)

  52. [52]

    Https://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/staff/pfreire/NS masses.html

  53. [53]

    M¨ uller, A

    B. M¨ uller, A. Heger, and J. Powell, Minimum Neutron Star Mass in Neutrino-Driven Supernova Explosions, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 071403 (2025), arXiv:2407.08407 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Radhakrishnan and D

    V. Radhakrishnan and D. J. Cooke, Magnetic Poles and the Polarization Structure of Pulsar Radiation, Astro- phys. Lett.3, 225 (1969)

    1969

  55. [55]

    Damour and J

    T. Damour and J. H. Taylor, Strong-field tests of rela- tivistic gravity and binary pulsars, Phys. Rev. D45, 1840 (1992)

    1992

  56. [56]

    J. Xu, J. Jiang, H. Xu, B. Wang, Z. Xue, S. Chen, Y. Guo, R. N. Caballero, K. Lee, J. Yuan, and et al., The Chinese pulsar timing array data release I: Polarime- try for 56 millisecond pulsars, A&A695, A173 (2025), arXiv:2502.20820 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    P. C. Peters, Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses, Physical Review136, 1224 (1964)

    1964

  58. [58]

    Gao, S.-K

    H. Gao, S.-K. Ai, Z.-J. Cao, B. Zhang, Z.-Y. Zhu, A. Li, N.-B. Zhang, and A. Bauswein, Relation between grav- itational mass and baryonic mass for non-rotating and rapidly rotating neutron stars, Frontiers of Physics15, 24603 (2020), arXiv:1905.03784 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    M. H. van Kerkwijk, R. P. Breton, and S. R. Kulka- rni, Evidence for a Massive Neutron Star from a Radial- velocity Study of the Companion to the Black-widow Pul- sar PSR B1957+20, ApJ728, 95 (2011), arXiv:1009.5427 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    ¨Ozel and P

    F. ¨Ozel and P. Freire, Masses, Radii, and the Equa- tion of State of Neutron Stars, ARA&A54, 401 (2016), arXiv:1603.02698 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Sarin, P

    N. Sarin, P. D. Lasky, and G. Ashton, Gravita- tional waves or deconfined quarks: What causes the premature collapse of neutron stars born in short gamma-ray bursts?, Phys. Rev. D101, 063021 (2020), arXiv:2001.06102 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    S. M. Kopeikin, Proper Motion of Binary Pulsars as a Source of Secular Variations of Orbital Parameters, ApJ 467, L93 (1996)

    1996

  63. [63]

    Z. Chen, Y. Lu, Y. Luo, J. Zhang, X. Guo, J. Liu, and W.-T. Ni, Detectability of nearby binary neutron stars with future sub-mHz gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D113, 084013 (2026), arXiv:2603.16386 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Martens, M

    W. Martens, M. Khan, and J.-B. Bayle, LISAmax: im- proving the low-frequency gravitational-wave sensitivity by two orders of magnitude, Classical and Quantum Gravity40, 195022 (2023), arXiv:2304.08287 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Mueller, J

    G. Mueller, J. Baker, S. Barke, P. L. Bender, E. Berti, R. Caldwell, J. W. Conklin, N. Cornish, E. C. Ferrara, K. Holley-Bockelmann, B. Kamai, S. L. Larson, J. Livas, S. T. McWilliams, G. Mueller, P. Natarajan, N. Rioux, S. S. Sankar, J. Schnittman, D. Shoemaker, J. Slutsky, R. Stebbins, I. Thorpe, and J. Ziemer, Space based grav- itational wave astronomy...

    2019

  66. [66]

    Ni, Astrod-Gw Overview and Progress, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D22, 1341004 (2013), arXiv:1212.2816 [astro-ph.IM]

    W.-T. Ni, Astrod-Gw Overview and Progress, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D22, 1341004 (2013), arXiv:1212.2816 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Hu and P

    H. Hu and P. C. C. Freire, Measuring the Lense- Thirring Orbital Precession and the Neutron Star Mo- ment of Inertia with Pulsars, Universe10, 160 (2024), arXiv:2403.18785 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    R. D. Ferdman, I. H. Stairs, M. Kramer, R. P. Breton, M. A. McLaughlin, P. C. C. Freire, A. Possenti, B. W. Stappers, V. M. Kaspi, R. N. Manchester, and A. G. Lyne, The Double Pulsar: Evidence for Neutron Star Formation without an Iron Core-collapse Supernova, ApJ 767, 85 (2013), arXiv:1302.2914 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    L. Meng, W. Zhu, M. Kramer, X. Miao, G. Desvignes, L. Shao, H. Hu, P. C. C. Freire, Y. Zhang, M. Xue, Z. Fang, D. J. Champion, M. Yuan, C. Miao, J. Niu, Q. Fu, J. Yao, Y. Guo, and C. Zhang, The Relativis- tic Spin Precession in the Compact Double Neutron Star System PSR J1946+2052, ApJ966, 46 (2024), arXiv:2403.17828 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2052