Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 56 references

Structure and thermodynamic stability of $\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ surfaces

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stoichiometric β-Ga₂O₃ surfaces stay lowest-energy across ordinary growth conditions; Ga adlayers appear only when oxygen is scarce.

desk verdict Solid, useful unification of β-Ga2O3 low-index surface thermodynamics; claim holds inside a clearly scoped bulk-truncated model, with the main limit being reconstructions left out of scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27424 v1 pith:SU6CWOP5 submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Konstantin Lion , Claudia Draxl This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords β-Ga2O3surfacefreeenergystoichiometricterminationsGaadlayeroxygenchemicalpotentialWulffconstructiondensity-functionaltheorycoordinationmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper maps the thermodynamic stability of every symmetrically distinct low-index surface of monoclinic β-Ga₂O₃ under the oxygen chemical potentials that matter for crystal growth. Using density-functional theory, the authors show that terminations keeping the bulk 2:3 Ga:O ratio win over nearly the whole stability window of the oxide, while non-stoichiometric cuts appear only at extreme reducing or oxidizing limits. Under highly reducing conditions they predict stable Ga-rich terminations that look like gallium adlayers on the (100) and (−201) faces—the orientations used most in epitaxy. A simple coordination model explains the ranking: under-coordinated oxygen and tetrahedral gallium raise the energy, whereas exposed under-coordinated octahedral gallium marks a stable face. Vibrational free-energy corrections stay small and do not reorder the surfaces. The result gives growers a concrete map of which faces and terminations to expect as oxygen pressure and temperature change.

What carries the argument

Ab initio surface free energy γ(T, p_O) from symmetric bulk-truncated slabs, with Ga and O chemical potentials linked by bulk equilibrium, plus a linear coordination model that expresses γ from the areal densities of under-coordinated tetrahedral Ga, octahedral Ga, and oxygen.

What would settle it

Surface-sensitive growth or spectroscopy experiments that detect a Ga adlayer (or its absence) on (100) or (−201) β-Ga₂O₃ precisely when the oxygen chemical potential crosses roughly −2.5 eV would confirm or refute the predicted transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stoichiometric terminations of the low-index β-Ga₂O₃ surfaces are thermodynamically preferred over nearly the entire oxygen-chemical-potential range relevant to bulk stability; stable Ga-rich terminations resembling Ga adlayers form on (100) and (−201) only under highly reducing conditions (Δμ_O < −2.5 eV), while O-rich terminations appear only under strongly oxidizing conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The stability ranking rests on bulk-truncated slab cuts alone; larger reconstructions or adsorbate-covered surfaces are left out and could lower non-stoichiometric energies inside the normal growth window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under ordinary MOVPE or melt-growth oxygen pressures, growers should expect stoichiometric (100), (−201), and (001) faces rather than reconstructed non-stoichiometric ones.
  • Highly reducing growth recipes that deliberately enter the Ga-adlayer regime on (100) can lower step-edge barriers and favor step-flow morphology.
  • Wulff shapes remain (100)-dominated (~42 % area) across the chemical-potential window, with (11−1), (001), and (−201) sharing most of the rest.
  • The coordination model supplies a quick filter for ranking higher-index stoichiometric orientations before full DFT.
  • Hybrid and semi-local functionals give the same energetic order, so cheaper PBEsol rankings are sufficient for morphology work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If intentional Ga-adlayer growth on (100) proves controllable, the same reducing window may be usable on (−201) substrates to engineer similar step-flow behavior.
  • Because under-coordinated tetrahedral Ga is strongly penalizing, any future reconstruction search should prioritize motifs that restore fourfold Ga2 coordination.
  • The small vibrational corrections suggest that finite-temperature morphology maps for this oxide can often omit phonons unless two terminations lie within ~0.1 J/m².
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a systematic DFT study of all symmetrically inequivalent low-index surfaces of monoclinic β-Ga₂O₃—(010), (100), (001), (¯201), (110), (111), and (11¯1)—using PBEsol and PBE0(0.26) in FHI-aims. Surface free energies are obtained from standard ab initio thermodynamics (Eqs. 1–7), with optional harmonic vibrational corrections for stoichiometric terminations (Eq. 4). The authors report a consistent energetic ordering across functionals, with (100) lowest (~0.6 J/m²) and (010)/(110) highest (~1.6–1.7 J/m²), vibrations below 0.2 J/m² up to 1000 K that do not reorder surfaces, and a linear coordination model (Eq. 8, Table II) linking stability to under-coordinated O and Ga environments. Thermodynamic diagrams (Fig. 4, A.2) show stoichiometric terminations stable over nearly the full bulk-stability window in Δμ_O, with Ga-rich adlayer-like terminations on (100) and (¯201) only under highly reducing conditions and limited O-rich terminations under strong oxidation; Wulff shapes (Fig. 5) are dominated by (100).

Significance. The work fills a clear gap by treating all low-index orientations of β-Ga₂O₃ on equal footing with both semi-local and hybrid functionals, vibrational free energies, and full chemical-potential dependence. The consistent ordering with literature (Table I), the explicit prediction of Ga-adlayer-like terminations under reducing conditions that aligns with cited MOVPE observations, and the openly archived NOMAD data set are concrete strengths. The coordination model, while secondary and fitted, offers a transparent structural rationale that could guide higher-index screening. Within the stated scope of bulk-truncated terminations, the results provide a useful reference for growth and substrate selection in power electronics.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV C / Fig. 4] In Sec. IV C and Fig. 4 the O-rich transition is written once as “ΔΔμ_O > −0.5 eV”; this is a typographical slip for Δμ_O.
  2. [Table I] Table I header lists (201) without the overbar used elsewhere for (¯201); the same orientation should be labeled consistently.
  3. [Appendix Fig. A.1] Fig. A.1 atom-index plots would be easier to read if the surface-normal Δz panels used a common vertical scale or if the most displaced atoms were annotated.
  4. [Sec. IV A, Eq. 8] The coordination model (Eq. 8) is fitted only to stoichiometric terminations; a brief remark on whether the same coefficients remain meaningful for the non-stoichiometric cases in Fig. A.2 would clarify its intended range of use.
  5. [Sec. III] A short statement of slab thickness (or number of formula units) for each orientation would help readers assess residual finite-size effects beyond the force and vacuum criteria already given.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: main surface free energies and thermodynamic ordering are independent DFT results; only a secondary coordination fit mildly renames in-sample residuals as predictions.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV A, Eq. 8 and Table II; also Summary]
    "Fitting this model to our DFT-calculated surface energies yield the parameters displayed in Table II, indicating that the errors of the predicted surface energies are below 10 % for all stoichiometric terminations. ... This model successfully predicts surface energies within 10 % accuracy for all stoichiometric terminations and could serve as a qualitatively predictive tool for higher-order surface orientations."

    The linear coefficients are fit to the full set of stoichiometric DFT surface energies already computed; reporting the in-sample residuals as “predicted” surface energies is tautological for those terminations. The step is minor and non-load-bearing: the model is not used to generate Fig. 4, the Ga-adlayer claim, or the Wulff shapes.

full rationale

The central claims—stoichiometric surface energies, their ordering across PBEsol/PBE0, vibrational corrections, chemical-potential diagrams, Ga-adlayer-like terminations under O-poor conditions, and Wulff shapes—follow standard ab initio thermodynamics (Eqs. 1–7) from DFT total energies of bulk-truncated slabs referenced to bulk Ga2O3 and O2. Those energies are not normalized or fitted to equal a target stability window; the stoichiometric dominance from roughly Δμ_O ≈ −2.5 to −0.5 eV is an output of comparing computed terminations, not an input. Self-citations (e.g., Schewski et al. with overlapping authors) supply experimental growth context and do not underwrite uniqueness or force the DFT ordering. The only mild circularity is secondary: the coordination model (Eq. 8) is linearly fitted to the same stoichiometric DFT energies it then reports as “predicted” within 10%, and is offered only as a qualitative correlate, not as the source of the thermodynamic diagrams. That does not make the paper’s primary first-principles results circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central thermodynamic claims rest on standard DFT total-energy differences in the ab initio atomistic thermodynamics framework, equilibrium of Ga and O chemical potentials with bulk Ga2O3, replacement of the computed O2 binding energy by the experimental value, harmonic vibrational free energies for selected stoichiometric slabs, and restriction to bulk-truncated symmetric terminations. The coordination model adds four fitted energy-per-undercoordinated-atom parameters used only for interpretation. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • PBE0 exact-exchange mixing α = 0.26
    Set to 0.26 to match the experimental bulk gap of 4.9 eV rather than derived from the surface problem; affects hybrid surface energies used for cross-check.
  • Coordination-model coefficients f_tet_3, f_oct_4, f_oct_5, f_O_2 = 12.76, 5.45, -7.46, 18.61 J/atom
    Linear fit of stoichiometric PBEsol surface energies to densities of under-coordinated atom types (Eq. 8); descriptive parameters, not inputs to the thermo diagrams.
  • Experimental O2 binding energy substituted into μ_O = −5.22 eV
    E_b^exp = −5.22 eV replaces poorly described DFT O2 binding when building μ_O (Eq. 5), shifting the absolute chemical-potential scale by construction.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Surface free energy from slab Gibbs energy minus chemical-potential reservoir terms for symmetric slabs (Eq. 1–3).
    Standard ab initio atomistic thermodynamics; invoked throughout §II and results.
  • domain assumption G ≈ E_DFT for slabs and bulk, with optional additive harmonic F_vib only for stoichiometric terminations (Eq. 4).
    Stated in §II; configurational entropy and anharmonicity omitted.
  • domain assumption 2μ_Ga + 3μ_O = g_bulk (equilibrium with bulk Ga2O3).
    Eq. 2; closes the chemical-potential space used in all stability diagrams.
  • domain assumption Stability window bounded by bulk formation enthalpy: (1/3)H_f < Δμ_O < 0, with computed H_f underestimating experiment.
    Eq. 6 and following text; authors note bounds are not strict in plasma/ozone experiments.
  • ad hoc to paper Only bulk-truncated terminations (and verification in larger cells without systematic reconstruction search) represent relevant stable surfaces.
    Computational Details and Summary explicitly place further reconstructions and adsorbates out of scope; load-bearing for stoichiometric-dominance and adlayer claims.
  • domain assumption Harmonic phonopy supercells ≥12 Å laterally suffice for surface vibrational free energies up to 1000 K.
    §III; used to bound γ_vib < 0.2 J/m².

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structure and thermodynamic stability of $\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SU6CWOP5

@misc{pith2026260727424,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structure and thermodynamic stability of $\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SU6CWOP5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27424}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive first-principles investigation of all symmetrically inequivalent low-index surfaces of $\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$, examining their structural properties and thermodynamic stability across experimentally relevant growth conditions. Using density-functional theory with both semi-local (PBEsol) and hybrid (PBE0) functionals, we calculate surface free energies for the (010), (100), (001), ($\bar{2}01$), (110), (111), and ($11\bar{1}$) orientations, including the effects of harmonic vibrational contributions and varying oxygen chemical potentials. We demonstrate that the energetic ordering remains consistent across computational approaches and that the vibrational contributions remain below 0.2 J/m$^2$ up to temperatures of 1000 K. A coordination-based model that correlates surface stability with the density of under-coordinated atoms reveals that under-coordinated oxygen atoms and tetrahedral Ga sites substantially destabilize surfaces, while exposed under-coordinated octahedral Ga atoms serve as indicators of surface stability. Our thermodynamic analysis shows that stoichiometric terminations dominate over nearly the entire range of chemical potentials relevant for $\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ stability, while non-stoichiometric terminations emerge only under extreme reducing or oxidizing conditions. Notably, we predict the formation of stable Ga-rich terminations resembling Ga adlayers for the (100) and ($\bar{2}01$) surfaces under highly reducing conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27424 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Conventional bulk unit cell of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Top: Surface free energies of the most stable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Surface free energy diagram for stable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Top (left) and side (right) views of the stable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Predicted equilibrium shapes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references

  1. [1]

    A. J. Green, J. Speck, G. Xing, P. Moens, F. Allerstam, K. Gumaelius, T. Neyer, A. Arias-Purdue, V. Mehro- tra, A. Kuramata, K. Sasaki, S. Watanabe, K. Koshi, J. Blevins, O. Bierwagen, S. Krishnamoorthy, K. Leedy, A. R. Arehart, A. T. Neal, S. Mou, S. A. Ringel, A. Kumar, A. Sharma, K. Ghosh, U. Singisetti, W. Li, K. Chabak, K. Liddy, A. Islam, S. Rajan, ...

    2022

  2. [2]

    Higashiwaki and G

    M. Higashiwaki and G. H. Jessen, Guest Editorial: The dawn of gallium oxide microelectronics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 060401 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Higashiwaki and S

    M. Higashiwaki and S. Fujita, eds.,Gallium Oxide: Mate- rials Properties, Crystal Growth, and Devices, Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 293 (Springer Interna- tional Publishing, Cham, 2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    S. J. Pearton, J. Yang, P. H. Cary, F. Ren, J. Kim, M. J. Tadjer, and M. A. Mastro, A review of Ga2O3 materi- als, processing, and devices, Appl. Phys. Rev.5, 011301 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Galazka, R

    Z. Galazka, R. Uecker, D. Klimm, K. Irmscher, M. Nau- mann, M. Pietsch, A. Kwasniewski, R. Bertram, S. Gan- schow, and M. Bickermann, Scaling-up of bulkβ-Ga2O3 single crystals by the czochralski method, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol.6, Q3007 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Galazka,β-Ga2O3 for Wide-Bandgap Electronics and Optoelectronics, Semicond

    Z. Galazka,β-Ga2O3 for Wide-Bandgap Electronics and Optoelectronics, Semicond. Sci. Technol.33, 113001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Bermudez, The structure of low-index surfaces ofβ- Ga2O3, Chemical Physics323, 193 (2006)

    V. Bermudez, The structure of low-index surfaces ofβ- Ga2O3, Chemical Physics323, 193 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    S. Mu, M. Wang, H. Peelaers, and C. G. Van de Walle, First-Principles Surface Energies for Monoclinic Ga2O3 and Al 2O3 and Consequences for Cracking of (AlxGa1−x)2O3, APL Materials8, 091105 (2020)

    2020

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Hinuma, T

    Y. Hinuma, T. Gake, and F. Oba, Band alignment at sur- faces and heterointerfaces of Al2O3, Ga2O3, In2O3, and related group-III oxide polymorphs: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. Materials3, 084605 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Hinuma, T

    Y. Hinuma, T. Kamachi, N. Hamamoto, M. Takao, T. Toyao, and K.-i. Shimizu, Surface Oxygen Vacancy Formation Energy Calculations in 34 Orientations of β-Ga2O3 andθ-Al2O3, J. Phys. Chem. C124, 10509 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    E. A. Gonzalez, P. V. Jasen, A. Juan, S. E. Collins, M. A. Baltan´ as, and A. L. Bonivardi, Hydrogen adsorption on β-Ga2O3(100) surface containing oxygen vacancies, Sur- face Science575, 171 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    M. Wang, S. Mu, and C. G. Van De Walle, Surface recon- structions on bare and hydrogenatedβ−Ga2O3 surfaces: Implications for growth, Phys. Rev. Materials7, 064603 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Anvari, D

    R. Anvari, D. Spagnoli, G. Parish, and B. Nener, Density Functional Theory Simulations of Water Adsorption and Activation on the (-201)β-Ga2O3 Surface, Chem. - Eur. J.24, 7445 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Bertoni, A

    I. Bertoni, A. Ugolotti, E. Scalise, and L. Miglio, Surface and volume energies ofα-,β-, andκ-Ga2O3 under epi- taxial strain induced by a sapphire substrate, J. Mater. Chem. C12, 1820 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    S. B. Anooz, R. Gr¨ uneberg, T. Chou, A. Fiedler, K. Irm- scher, C. Wouters, R. Schewski, M. Albrecht, Z. Galazka, W. Miller, J. Schwarzkopf, and A. Popp, Impact of cham- ber pressure and Si-doping on the surface morphology and electrical properties of homoepitaxial (100)β-Ga2...

    2020

  8. [16]

    S. B. Anooz, R. Gr¨ uneberg, C. Wouters, R. Schewski, M. Albrecht, A. Fiedler, K. Irmscher, Z. Galazka, W. Miller, G. Wagner, J. Schwarzkopf, and A. Popp, Step flow growth ofβ-Ga2O3 thin films on vicinal (100)β- Ga2O3 substrates grown by MOVPE, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 182106 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Schewski, K

    R. Schewski, K. Lion, A. Fiedler, C. Wouters, A. Popp, S. V. Levchenko, T. Schulz, M. Schmidbauer, S. Bin Anooz, R. Gr¨ uneberg, Z. Galazka, G. Wagner, K. Irmscher, M. Scheffler, C. Draxl, and M. Albrecht, Step-flow growth in homoepitaxy ofβ-Ga2O3 (100)— The influence of the m...

    2018

  10. [18]

    Cheng, M

    Z. Cheng, M. Hanke, Z. Galazka, and A. Trampert, Growth mode evolution during (100)-orientedβ-Ga2O3 homoepitaxy, Nanotechnology29, null (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    T.-S. Chou, P. Seyidov, S. Bin Anooz, R. Gr¨ uneberg, T. T. V. Tran, K. Irmscher, M. Albrecht, Z. Galazka, J. Schwarzkopf, and A. Popp, Fast homoepitaxial growth of (100)β-Ga 2O3 thin films via MOVPE, AIP Advances 11, 115323 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    T.-S. Chou, J. Rehm, S. Bin Anooz, O. Ernst, A. Akhtar, Z. Galazka, W. Miller, M. Albrecht, P. Seyidov, A. Fiedler, and A. Popp, Exploring miscut angle influence on (100)β-Ga2O3 homoepitaxial films growth: Compar- ing MOVPE growth with MBE approaches, Journal of Applied Physic...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Bhattacharyya, P

    A. Bhattacharyya, P. Ranga, S. Roy, J. Ogle, L. Whittaker-Brooks, and S. Krishnamoorthy, Low tem- perature homoepitaxy of (010)β-Ga2O3 by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy: Expanding the growth window, Appl. Phys. Lett.null, null (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    G.-X. Qian, R. M. Martin, and D. J. Chadi, First- principles study of the atomic reconstructions and ener- gies of Ga- and As-stabilized GaAs(100) surfaces, Phys. Rev. B38, 7649 (1988)

    1988

  15. [23]

    Rogal, K

    J. Rogal, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Thermodynamic stability of PdO surfaces, Phys. Rev. B69, 075421 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Reuter and M

    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, Composition and structure of the RuO2 (110) surface in an O2 and CO environment: Implications for the catalytic formation of CO2, Phys. Rev. B68, 045407 (2003)

    2003

  17. [25]

    Reuter and M

    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, Composition, structure, and stability of RuO2 (110) as a function of oxygen pressure, Phys. Rev. B65, 035406 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    Rogal and K

    J. Rogal and K. Reuter,Ab Initio Atomistic Thermody- namics for Surfaces: A Primer(2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    K. K. Irikura, Experimental Vibrational Zero-Point En- ergies: Diatomic Molecules, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data36, 389 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    Zhang and W

    Y. Zhang and W. Yang, A challenge for density func- tionals: Self-interaction error increases for systems with a noninteger number of electrons, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics109, 2604 (1998). 12

    1998

  21. [29]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    Ernzerhof, J

    M. Ernzerhof, J. P. Perdew, and K. Burke, Coupling- constant dependence of atomization energies, Int. J. Quantum Chem.64, 285 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Feller and K

    D. Feller and K. A. Peterson, Re-examination of atom- ization energies for the Gaussian-2 set of molecules, The Journal of Chemical Physics110, 8384 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Stull and H

    D. Stull and H. Prophet,JANAF Thermochemical Ta- bles, 2nd ed. (U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Wash- ington, D.C., 1971)

    1971

  25. [33]

    D. R. Lide, ed.,CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Internet Version 2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals, Com- puter Physics Communications180, 2175 (2009)

    2009

  27. [35]

    J. W. Abbott, C. Mera Acosta, A. Akkoush, A. Am- brosetti, V. Atalla, A. Bagrets, J. Behler, D. Berger, H. Bertschi, B. Bieniek, J. Bj¨ ork, V. Blum, S. Bohloul, C. L. Box, N. J. Boyer, D. S. Brambila, G. A. Bram- ley, K. R. Bryenton, M. Camarasa-G´ omez, C. Carbogno, F. Carus...

    2026

  28. [36]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vy- drov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    Wouters, C

    C. Wouters, C. Sutton, L. M. Ghiringhelli, T. Markurt, R. Schewski, A. Hassa, H. von Wenckstern, M. Grund- mann, M. Scheffler, and M. Albrecht, Investigat- ing the ranges of (meta)stable phase formation in ( InxGa1-x)2O3: Impact of the cation coordination, Phys. Rev. Materials...

    2020

  30. [38]

    K. Lion, P. Pavone, and C. Draxl, Elastic stability of Ga2O3: Addressing theβtoαphase transition from first principles, Phys. Rev. Materials6, 013601 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reliable density func- tional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, The Journal of Chemical Physics110, 6158 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Ernzerhof and G

    M. Ernzerhof and G. E. Scuseria, Assessment of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation func- tional, The Journal of Chemical Physics110, 5029 (1999)

    1999

  33. [41]

    De´ ak, M

    P. De´ ak, M. Lorke, B. Aradi, and T. Frauenheim, Opti- mized hybrid functionals for defect calculations in semi- conductors, Journal of Applied Physics126, 130901 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Orita, H

    M. Orita, H. Ohta, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Deep- ultraviolet transparent conductiveβ-Ga2O3 thin films, Applied Physics Letters77, 4166 (2000)

    2000

  35. [43]

    ˚Ahman, G

    J. ˚Ahman, G. Svensson, and J. Albertsson, A Reinves- tigation ofβ-Gallium Oxide, Acta Crystallogr C Cryst Struct Commun52, 1336 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, Python Materials Genomics (py- matgen): A robust, open-source python library for mate- rials analysis, Computational Materials Science68, 314 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Sun and G

    W. Sun and G. Ceder, Efficient creation and convergence of surface slabs, Surf. Sci.617, 53 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Togo, First-principles Phonon Calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles Phonon Calculations with Phonopy and Phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, Imple- mentation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 353001 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    De´ ak, Q

    P. De´ ak, Q. Duy Ho, F. Seemann, B. Aradi, M. Lorke, and T. Frauenheim, Choosing the Correct Hybrid for Defect Calculations: A Case Study on Intrinsic Carrier Trapping inβ-Ga2O3, Phys. Rev. B95, 075208 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Draxl and M

    C. Draxl and M. Scheffler, NOMAD: The F AIR concept for big data-driven materials science, MRS Bull.43, 676 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Draxl and M

    C. Draxl and M. Scheffler, The NOMAD laboratory: From data sharing to artificial intelligence, J. Phys. Mater.2, 036001 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Scheidgen, L

    M. Scheidgen, L. Himanen, A. N. Ladines, D. Sikter, M. Nakhaee, ´A. Fekete, T. Chang, A. Golparvar, J. A. M´ arquez, S. Brockhauser, S. Br¨ uckner, L. M. Ghir- 13 inghelli, F. Dietrich, D. Lehmberg, T. Denell, A. Al- bino, H. N¨ asstr¨ om, S. Shabih, F. Dobener, M. K¨ uhbach, ...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Schewski, K

    R. Schewski, K. Lion, A. Fiedler, C. Wouters, A. Popp, S. V. Levchenko, T. Schulz, M. Schmidbauer, S. Bin Anooz, R. Gr¨ uneberg, Z. Galazka, G. Wagner, K. Irmscher, M. Scheffler, C. Draxl, and M. Albrecht, Step-flow growth in homoepitaxy ofβ-Ga 2 O 3 (100)— The influence of th...

    2019

  45. [53]

    L. Wang, F. Zhou, Y. S. Meng, and G. Ceder, First- principles study of surface properties of LiFePO4 : Sur- face energy, structure, Wulff shape, and surface redox potential, Phys. Rev. B76, 165435 (2007)

    2007

  46. [54]

    Sterrer and H.-J

    M. Sterrer and H.-J. Freund, Properties of Oxide Surfaces, inSurface and Interface Science, edited by K. Wandelt (Wiley, 2013) 1st ed., pp. 229–278

    2013

  47. [55]

    Wulff, XXV

    G. Wulff, XXV. Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wach- sthums und der Aufl¨ osung der Krystallfl¨ achen, Z. F¨ ur Krist. - Cryst. Mater.34, 449 (1901)

    1901

  48. [56]

    J. M. Rahm and P. Erhart, WulffPack: A Python package for Wulff constructions, J. Open Source Softw.5, 1944 (2020)

    1944

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.