Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 106 references

Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity on a fuzzy sphere

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that on a fuzzy sphere — where spatial coordinates are non-commuting N×N matrices — the finite mode cutoff enhances Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity, and in the large-radius limit turns the normal fluid density

desk verdict Fuzzy-sphere formalism with real value, but the two headline claims — enhanced BEC and linear-in-T superfluid density — fail against the paper's own equations, so it needs major rework before it can be published. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27470 v1 pith:HXQIDDK4 submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.quant-gas hep-th

Vira Shyta , Flavio S. Nogueira , Ashley M. Cook This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gashep-th MSC 81T7582B1082D50
keywords Bose-Einsteincondensationsuperfluidityfuzzyspherenon-commutativegeometrynormalfluiddensityUemuralawBogoliubovapproximationvortices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that spatial non-commutativity—the fuzziness of a sphere whose coordinate operators obey an SU(2) commutator—acts as a natural ultraviolet cutoff that suppresses thermal fluctuations. Using ideal and weakly interacting Bose gases formulated as matrix fields on a fuzzy sphere, it finds that the BEC critical temperature is higher than on an ordinary sphere, and the condensate depletion is smaller. For superfluidity, the current-correlator calculation yields a normal-fluid density that in the large-radius limit behaves as ρ_n ∝ M(M+1)T/R², a linear-in-T law distinct from the planar T³ behavior. Because this linear law is of the same form as the empirical relation between superfluid density and critical temperature in high-temperature superconductors, the paper argues that non-commutative geometry alone can produce such scaling. A sympathetic reader would care because the result points to a purely geometric mechanism for stabilizing quantum order.

What carries the argument

The fuzzy sphere: coordinates X_i are promoted to N×N matrices satisfying [X_i,X_j]=i(2R/N)ε_ijk X_k; scalar fields become matrix-valued, derivatives are commutators with angular momentum, and integration is a trace. The non-commutativity scale N (equivalently M=N−1) sets an upper cutoff in angular momentum l≤M, which truncates the thermal spectrum. The superfluid density calculation uses the Kubo current-correlation formula in the Bogoliubov approximation with the hydrodynamic spectrum E_l≈v√(l(l+1))/R, and the replacement of the discrete l-sum by an integral with upper cutoff Λ=v²M(M+1)/R² yields a closed form whose large-R asymptote is the linear-in-T expression.

What would settle it

Evaluate the Matsubara sum in Eq. (36) exactly for finite M and R, or numerically, and check whether the large-R asymptote is indeed ρ_n ≈ M(M+1)T/(8πv²R²). If the exact result shows ρ_n∼T³ or a different power law once the l-sum is not approximated as an integral, the central claim fails. Alternatively, measure the superfluid density of a Bose gas on a spherical shell with a tunable angular-momentum cutoff: if the normal fraction grows as T³ for large radius, the fuzzy prediction is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that on a fuzzy sphere the maximum angular momentum M=N−1 truncates the one-particle spectrum, and this truncation survives the thermodynamic limit if the non-commutativity parameter 2R/N is held fixed while R and N diverge. The paper derives Eq. (38): for large radius, the normal fluid density is ρ_n ≈ M(M+1)T/(8πv²R²), so the superfluid fraction obeys ρ_s(0) ∝ T_c with a proportionality constant fixed by the non-commutativity parameter. In the commutative limit M→∞, the same expression reduces to ρ_n = 3ζ(3)T³/(2πv⁴), the planar two-dimensional result. The difference in power laws is attributed to a persistent spectral cutoff that suppresses thermally excited modes, st

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on a particular thermodynamic limit: one must keep the non-commutativity parameter 2R/N fixed while R and N diverge so that the mode cutoff survives; if instead the commutative limit is taken first, or the finite-M large-R limit is treated as thermodynamic, the linear-in-T law and the enhanced ordering disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Higher BEC critical temperature: both ideal and weakly interacting Bose gases condense at higher T on a fuzzy sphere than on a commutative sphere, with the enhancement growing as non-commutativity increases.
  • Reduced quantum depletion: the zero-temperature condensate fraction is larger on the fuzzy sphere, meaning fuzziness protects order even at T=0.
  • Uemura-like scaling: the normal fluid density becomes linear in T in the large-sphere limit, giving ρ_s(0) = [M(M+1)/(8πv²R²)] T_c, a relation of the same form as the empirical cuprate scaling law.
  • Distinct thermodynamic limit: unlike the ordinary sphere, the fuzzy sphere does not flow to the plane as R→∞; the mode cutoff persists and geometry remains observable.
  • Vortex structure: point vortices become smeared objects of width ξ_F∼R/√N, so a strict vortex-unbinding transition is replaced by a phonon-driven superfluid transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear-in-T result is derived at finite M with R→∞, while the paper's own thermodynamic-limit prescription (fixed 2R/N) drives the ideal-gas BEC temperature to zero; the two limits do not commute, so experimental relevance depends on an intermediate regime where the cutoff is large but not yet fully thermodynamic.
  • Any mechanism that truncates the single-particle spectrum in two dimensions—a lattice, a Landau level, a finite trap depth—may produce a similar ρ_n∝T law, suggesting the phenomenon is more general than the fuzzy-sphere realization.
  • The vortex-commutator argument implies that a superfluid containing vortices automatically generates an effective non-commutativity for its vortex coordinates; this could be tested in rotating condensates by measuring vortex position correlations.
  • A direct numerical evaluation of the matrix model on a fuzzy sphere, without approximating the angular-momentum sum as an integral, could confirm whether Eq. (38) is the exact large-radius asymptotics or an artifact of the integral approximation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a matrix-field ('fuzzy sphere') formulation of a weakly interacting Bose gas on S^2, with N×N matrices and non-commutativity [X_i,X_j]=i(2R/N)ε_{ijk}X_k. It claims that fuzziness raises T_BEC for both ideal and interacting gases, that in a thermodynamic limit with 2R/N fixed the fuzzy sphere remains distinct from the plane, and that the normal-fluid density in the large-R limit is ρ_n≈M(M+1)T/(8πv^2R^2), yielding a Uemura-like linear-T relation. Section V constructs fuzzy vortices from coherent-state projectors. The central technical result is Eq. (37) for 4πρ_n, obtained in the Bogoliubov approximation.

Significance. The paper is self-contained: the partition functions, depletion, and current-correlation functions are derived explicitly, and the main claims are falsifiable (Eqs. 11, 27, 37, 38). A genuine non-commutative thermodynamic limit with a finite spectral cutoff would be a valuable counterexample to the usual equivalence of large spheres and planes. However, the two load-bearing results — the fuzzy thermodynamic limit and the linear-T normal density — are not supported by the paper's own equations. The vortex discussion in Section V is suggestive but does not enter the superfluid-density calculation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§IV, Eq. (38) vs Eq. (37)] Eq. (38) is not the large-R limit of Eq. (37). For fixed M and x=v√{M(M+1)}/(RT)→0, the last two terms of Eq. (37) give (6T^3/v^4)[ζ(3)-Li_3(e^{-x})] ≈ (6T^3/v^4)x(1-ln x), which is O((T^2√{M(M+1)}/(vR)) ln(RT/(v√{M(M+1)}))) and vanishes more slowly than any 1/R^2 term. The second term of Eq. (37) contributes (3T M(M+1)/(v^2R^2)) ln x, again with a logarithmic factor. Thus the asymptotic expansion of Eq. (37) is not the R^{-2} expression without logarithms displayed in Eq. (38); the omitted terms dominate at large finite R. Consequently Eq. (40) and the Uemura analogy rest on an algebraic inconsistency, not on the preceding calculation.
  2. [§III, Eqs. (11) and (26), thermodynamic limit] The advertised fixed-θ thermodynamic limit is not realized in the paper's formulas. With M≈N≈2R/θ and ε_l=l(l+1)/(2R^2), Eq. (11) in the limit R→∞ at fixed θ has ε_1→0 and ε_M→1/(2θ^2); the denominator logarithm grows as ln(R^2 T), giving T_BEC≈2πn/ln(R^2 T)→0. Likewise in Eq. (26), the second thermal term behaves as -(1/(2πβ)) ln(1-e^{-β√{2gn}/R}) ∼ (1/(2πβ)) ln(R/(β√{2gn}))→∞, so no finite density can be maintained with n_0≥0. The finite T_BEC shown in Fig. 1 and used in §IV instead fix M while R→∞, which is a finite-mode system with (M+1)^2 modes — a regime Section II.B itself flags as an artifact for small M. The paper therefore does not establish a thermodynamic limit that preserves both fuzziness and finite-temperature BEC.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II.A after Eq. (5)] Typo: 'faact' should be 'fact'.
  2. [Notation, Eqs. (2) and (8)] The symbol N denotes both the matrix dimension and the particle number in Section II.B. This is confusing in a thermodynamics paper and should be disambiguated.
  3. [§V.E] The fuzzy-vortex construction (coherent-state projectors, fuzzy Green function) is not connected back to the superfluid-density calculation of Section IV. Its role in supporting the main claims should be clarified or explicitly labeled as a separate outlook.
  4. [Fig. 1] The figure plots T_BEC/n versus nR^2 for fixed M, but the thermodynamic limit discussed in Section III is fixed θ=2R/(M+1). Showing the corresponding θ or R/N range would help determine whether any of the plotted curves survive the stated thermodynamic limit.
  5. [Eq. (58)] The pair partition function is written as Z_pair ∼ 1/(1-πρ0/(2T)), which suggests a divergence at the planar BKT condition. The text immediately warns that this is a crossover, not a genuine transition; the derivation should make this distinction more precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain is self-contained; the apparent limit inconsistencies are correctness issues, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central equations — Eq. (11), Eq. (27), and Eq. (37) — are obtained by direct algebra from the fuzzy-sphere action, mode decomposition, Bogoliubov approximation, and Kubo formula. No external or cuprate data are fitted, and no load-bearing claim rests on the authors' own prior work; the only self-citations (Refs. [75,79]) are motivational remarks about vortices and pairing, not inputs to the derivations. The Uemura comparison is a form analogy, not a fitted parameter or an imported uniqueness theorem. The strongest apparent problems are internal-consistency/correctness issues rather than circularity. In particular, Eq. (38) is not the fixed-M, R→∞ limit of Eq. (37), because Eq. (37) contains an R-independent 6T^3 ζ(3)/v^4 term; and under the fixed-θ limit that the paper itself defines as the fuzzy-sphere thermodynamic limit, Eq. (11) gives T_BEC→0, while the paper's finite-temperature enhancement plots use fixed M, a regime Section II.B explicitly flags as an artifact ('results lose physical significance... artifact related to an improper handling of the thermodynamic limit'). These non sequiturs are genuine validity concerns, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs and therefore do not count as circularity under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard fuzzy-sphere machinery plus the Bogoliubov/Kubo approximations. No parameters are fitted to experimental data. The notable ad hoc element is the choice of thermodynamic limit and the fixed-M, large-R expansion that produce the Uemura-like result; other natural limits give the planar T³ behavior or vanishing T_BEC.

free parameters (4)
  • M (matrix dimension / angular momentum cutoff)
    Controls the non-commutativity strength; T_BEC and ρ_n depend on M. In the claimed thermodynamic limit M ~ 2R/θ. The figures vary M while R changes, and the enhancement effects scale with M.
  • θ = 2R/N (non-commutativity parameter)
    Additional length scale of the fuzzy sphere; kept fixed in the claimed non-commutative thermodynamic limit; sets the coefficient of the linear-in-T term (Eq. 40) and the fuzzy length ξ_F.
  • v (Bogoliubov speed, v²=gn)
    Sets the superfluid density scale; appears throughout Eqs. (37)-(40). It is determined by interaction g and density n, both inputs to the model.
  • R (sphere radius)
    The large-R limit is central to the claims; Eq. (38) scales as M(M+1)T/(8πv²R²), and the thermodynamic limit requires R→∞.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Fuzzy sphere coordinate algebra [X_i,X_j] = i(2R/N)ε_ijk X_k (Eq. 2)
    The model of non-commutative space; standard in the fuzzy-sphere literature but an input, not derived here.
  • domain assumption Integration over the sphere is replaced by (4πR²/N)Tr for matrix fields
    Defines the field theory action (Eq. 3); standard fuzzy-sphere dictionary.
  • standard math Bogoliubov approximation: keep terms up to second order in fluctuations (Eqs. 13-14)
    Standard weak-coupling approximation; assumes small fluctuations and a large condensate.
  • domain assumption Linear (hydrodynamic) Bogoliubov spectrum E_l ≈ v√{l(l+1)}/R (Eq. 35)
    Valid for large R and low l; the central formula Eq. (37) is derived under this approximation, so its validity is inherited.
  • domain assumption Replacement of sums over l by integrals (Eq. 9 and Appendix A)
    Used to obtain closed-form results; inaccurate for small M, which is the regime where the fuzzy enhancements are largest.
  • ad hoc to paper Thermodynamic limit keeps θ=2R/N fixed while R,N→∞ (Section III)
    This definition is chosen to preserve the non-commutative corrections; under this limit T_BEC→0 and ρ_n→T³ at low T, so the paper's headline claims rely on not strictly taking this limit.
invented entities (2)
  • Fuzzy vortex (coherent-state projector δ_a = N/(4πR²)P_a)
    purpose: Replaces point vortices with smeared finite-width defects on a space where points are not defined (Eqs. 61-66).
    A mathematical construction; no prediction of an observable that could confirm it independently of the model.
  • Fuzzy length ξ_F ~ R/√N
    purpose: Characterizes the smearing of vortices and the spectral cutoff responsible for the claimed linear-in-T behavior (Eq. 71).
    Defined through model parameters; not measured or predicted to match an external experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity on a fuzzy sphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HXQIDDK4

@misc{pith2026260727470,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity on a fuzzy sphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HXQIDDK4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27470}
}
abstract

According to Hohenberg's theorem, Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) in two dimensions is impossible for any temperature $T>0$. By contrast, superfluidity does occur in two dimensions at finite temperatures; it emerges due to the breaking of Galilei invariance. Here we consider BEC and superfluidity on a compact two-dimensional space taking the form of a non-commutative ("fuzzy") sphere, where the scalar bosonic fields are promoted to $N\times N$ matrices. The dimension $N$ is related to the non-commutativity parameter of space and introduces an additional scale into the system. We find that non-commutativity favors ordered phases and so enhances BEC and superfluidity. We analyze BEC in ideal and weakly interacting Bose gases on a fuzzy sphere, finding in each case that the critical temperature of BEC is greater compared to that found in the case of a commutative sphere $S^2$. Then we investigate the superfluid response of weakly interacting Bose systems. To account for vortices in a superfluid, we show that, even on an ordinary sphere, the collective coordinates of vortices induce non-commutativity. With this in mind, we extend the definition of vortex defects to an inherently non-commutative sphere studied here, where the notion of a point is untenable. The non-commutativity is expected to be experimentally relevant to BEC and superfluidity since the fuzzy sphere has a thermodynamic limit distinct from the one defined over a plane, unlike the $S^2$ case. The significance of this difference is illustrated by the superfluid density calculation indicating that, in the large sphere limit, the normal fluid fraction on the fuzzy sphere yields a linear in $T$ dependence, while on a commutative $S^2$ it exhibits the usual two-dimensional $\sim T^3$ behavior. This linear dependence, arising directly from non-commutativity, is reminiscent of Uemura's law in cuprate high-$T_c$ superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27470 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the behavior of ρn as a function of R for different values of M. We notice that the higher the fuzziness (i.e., by decreasing M), the higher the super￾fluid fraction will be. In view of this, it is interesting to consider the leading large R behavior for a finite M. The result is, ρn ≈ M(M + 1)T 8πv2R2 . (38) From this expression we clearly see that the critical tem￾perature grows as M decreases. On the other … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. F. Annett,Superconductivity, superfluids and conden- sates, Vol. 5 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid- insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  3. [3]

    Balibar, The enigma of supersolidity, Nature464, 176 (2010)

    S. Balibar, The enigma of supersolidity, Nature464, 176 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferro- magnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two- dimensional isotropic heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  5. [5]

    Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group i

    V. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group i. classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  6. [6]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  7. [7]

    Q. Chen, J. Stajic, S. Tan, and K. Levin, Bcs–bec crossover: From high temperature superconductors to ultracold superfluids, Physics Reports412, 1 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    J. P. Carbotte, T. Timusk, and J. Hwang, Bosons in high-temperature superconductors: an experimen- tal survey, Reports on Progress in Physics74, 066501 (2011)

    2011

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    P. Das, Comparative study of superfluid phase stiff- ness and bkt-like features in underdoped re-123 cuprates with ca and ce substitution, Physica C: Superconductiv- ity and its Applications648, 1354908 (2026)

    2026

  2. [10]

    J. Guo, Y. Zhou, C. Huang, S. Cai, Y. Sheng, G. Gu, C. Yang, G. Lin, K. Yang, A. Li, Q. Wu, T. Xiang, and L. Sun, Crossover from two-dimensional to three- dimensional superconducting states in bismuth-based cuprate superconductor, Nature Physics16, 295 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, S. Yang, and K. Levin, When superconductivity crosses over: From bcs to bec, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025002 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Z. Hu, Z. Ma, Y.-D. Liao, H. Li, C. Ma, Y. Cui, Y. Shangguan, Z. Huang, Y. Qi, W. Li, Z. Y. Meng, J. Wen, and W. Yu, Evidence of the berezinskii- kosterlitz-thouless phase in a frustrated magnet, Nature Communications11, 5631 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Zhang, Y

    D. Zhang, Y. Zhu, G. Zheng, K.-W. Chen, Q. Huang, L. Zhou, Y. Liu, K. Jenkins, A. Chan, H. Zhou, and L. Li, Field-tunable bkt and quantum phase transitions in spin-12 triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Newton1, 100256 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Hadzibabic, P

    Z. Hadzibabic, P. Kr¨ uger, M. Cheneau, B. Battelier, and J. Dalibard, Berezinskii–kosterlitz–thouless crossover in a trapped atomic gas, Nature441, 1118 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Sunami, V

    S. Sunami, V. P. Singh, D. Garrick, A. Beregi, A. J. Barker, K. Luksch, E. Bentine, L. Mathey, and C. J. Foot, Observation of the berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless transition in a two-dimensional bose gas via matter- wave interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 250402 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Y. He, Z. Chen, H. Zhen, M. Huang, M. K. Parit, and G.-B. Jo, Exploring the berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless 15 transition in a two-dimensional dipolar bose gas, Science Advances11, eadr2715 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Martinoli and C

    P. Martinoli and C. Leemann, Two dimensional joseph- son junction arrays, Journal of Low Temperature Physics118, 699 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, 2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    C. G. L. Bøttcher, F. Nichele, M. Kjaergaard, H. J. Suominen, J. Shabani, C. J. Palmstrøm, and C. M. Mar- cus, Superconducting, insulating and anomalous metal- lic regimes in a gated two-dimensional semiconductor– superconductor array, Nature Physics14, 1138 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Cosmic, K

    R. Cosmic, K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, H. Ikegami, S. Fu- rukawa, P. Patil, J. M. Taylor, and Y. Nakamura, Prob- ing xy phase transitions in a josephson junction ar- ray with tunable frustration, Phys. Rev. B102, 094509 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    C. G. L. Bøttcher, F. Nichele, J. Shabani, C. J. Palmstrøm, and C. M. Marcus, Berezinskii-kosterlitz- thouless transition and anomalous metallic phase in a hybrid josephson junction array, Phys. Rev. B110, L180502 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  15. [23]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Conden- sation, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    Tononi and L

    A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Bose-einstein condensation on the surface of a sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 160403 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    K. Sun, K. Padavi´ c, F. Yang, S. Vishveshwara, and C. Lannert, Static and dynamic properties of shell- shaped condensates, Phys. Rev. A98, 013609 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    N. S. M´ oller, F. E. A. dos Santos, V. S. Bagnato, and A. Pelster, Bose–einstein condensation on curved man- ifolds, New Journal of Physics22, 063059 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Tononi and L

    A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Low-dimensional quantum gases in curved geometries, Nature Reviews Physics5, 398 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Tononi, A

    A. Tononi, A. Pelster, and L. Salasnich, Topological su- perfluid transition in bubble-trapped condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013122 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Classical and Quantum Gravity9, 69 (1992)

    J. Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Classical and Quantum Gravity9, 69 (1992)

    1992

  22. [30]

    D. J. Bishop and J. D. Reppy, Study of the super- fluid transition in two-dimensional 4He films, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 1727 (1978)

    1978

  23. [31]

    A. P. Balachandran, S. Kurkcuoglu, and S. Vaidya, Lec- tures on fuzzy and fuzzy susy physics (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0511114 [hep-th]

    2006

  24. [32]

    V. P. Nair, A. P. Polychronakos, and J. Tekel, Fuzzy spaces and new random matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. D85, 045021 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    A. P. Polychronakos, Effective action and phase transi- tions of scalar field on the fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. D 88, 065010 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Pasquier, Quantum hall effect and non-commutative geometry, inQuantum Spaces: Poincar´ e Seminar 2007, edited by B

    V. Pasquier, Quantum hall effect and non-commutative geometry, inQuantum Spaces: Poincar´ e Seminar 2007, edited by B. Duplantier and V. Rivasseau (Birkh¨ auser Basel, Basel, 2007) pp. 1–17

    2007

  27. [35]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  28. [36]

    G. Fano, F. Ortolani, and E. Colombo, Configuration- interaction calculations on the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B34, 2670 (1986)

    1986

  29. [37]

    Greiter, Landau level quantization on the sphere, Phys

    M. Greiter, Landau level quantization on the sphere, Phys. Rev. B83, 115129 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Susskind, The quantum hall fluid and non- commutative chern simons theory (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0101029 [hep-th]

    L. Susskind, The quantum hall fluid and non- commutative chern simons theory (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0101029 [hep-th]

    2001

  31. [39]

    A. P. Polychronakos, Quantum Hall states as ma- trix Chern-Simons theory, JHEP04, 011, arXiv:hep- th/0103013

  32. [40]

    Hellerman and M

    S. Hellerman and M. V. Raamsdonk, Quantum hall physics = noncommutative field theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2001, 039 (2001)

    2001

  33. [41]

    F. D. M. Haldane and Y. Shen, Geometry of landau orbits in the absence of rotational symmetry (2016), arXiv:1512.04502 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Goldman and T

    H. Goldman and T. Senthil, Lowest landau level theory of the bosonic jain states, Phys. Rev. B105, 075130 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Watanabe and H

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama, Noncommuting mo- menta of topological solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 191804 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, and E. H. Rezayi, Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer to fractional quantum hall effect at small zeeman energies, Phys. Rev. B47, 16419 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    A. P. BALACHANDRAN and G. IMMIRZI, Duality in fuzzy sigma models, International Journal of Modern Physics A19, 5237 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X04020671

    2004 doi

  38. [46]

    Zhou, Fuzzified : Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Z. Zhou, Fuzzified : Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  39. [47]

    He and W

    Y.-C. He and W. Zhu, A fuzzy sphere journey in crit- ical phenomena, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics17, 1 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.-C. He, Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3d ising transition: State-operator correspondence from a quantum fuzzy sphere regularization, Phys. Rev. X13, 021009 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Hu, Y.-C

    L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Operator product expan- sion coefficients of the 3d ising criticality via quantum fuzzy spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 031601 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    J. Y. Araz, S. Schenk, and M. Spannowsky, Toward a quantum simulation of nonlinear sigma models with a topological term, Phys. Rev. A107, 032619 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Moroz, C

    S. Moroz, C. Hoyos, C. Benzoni, and D. T. Son, Effective field theory of a vortex lattice in a bosonic superfluid, SciPost Phys. , 039 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Y.-H. Du, S. Moroz, D. X. Nguyen, and D. T. Son, Noncommutative field theory of the tkachenko mode: Symmetries and decay rate, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012040 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Manoj, Noncommutative effective field theory of the lowest landau level superfluid, Phys

    N. Manoj, Noncommutative effective field theory of the lowest landau level superfluid, Phys. Rev. B112, 134521 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    G l´ odkowski, S

    A. G l´ odkowski, S. Moroz, F. Pe˜ na Ben ´ ıtez, and P. Sur´ owka, Effective field theory for the superfluid vor- tex lattice from coset construction, Phys. Rev. B113, 024506 (2026)

    2026

  47. [55]

    Tkachenko, On vortex lattices, Sov

    V. Tkachenko, On vortex lattices, Sov. Phys. JETP22, 1282 (1966)

    1966

  48. [56]

    Tkachenko, Stability of vortex lattices, Sov

    V. Tkachenko, Stability of vortex lattices, Sov. Phys. JETP23, 1049 (1966). 16

    1966

  49. [57]

    V. K. Tkachenko, Elasticity of vortex lattices, Soviet Physics JETP29, 945 (1969)

    1969

  50. [58]

    R. J. Fletcher, A. Shaffer, C. C. Wilson, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, V. Cr´ epel, B. Mukherjee, and M. W. Zwier- lein, Geometric squeezing into the lowest landau level, Science372, 1318 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Musser, H

    S. Musser, H. Goldman, and T. Senthil, Observable sig- natures of hall viscosity in lowest landau level superflu- ids, Phys. Rev. B110, 024515 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Nguyen, A

    D. Nguyen, A. Gromov, and S. Moroz, Fracton-elasticity duality of two-dimensional superfluid vortex crystals: defect interactions and quantum melting, SciPost Phys. 9, 076 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Schweikhard, I

    V. Schweikhard, I. Coddington, P. Engels, V. P. Mogen- dorff, and E. A. Cornell, Rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates in and near the lowest landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 040404 (2004)

    2004

  54. [62]

    Mukherjee, A

    B. Mukherjee, A. Shaffer, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, C. C. Wilson, V. Cr´ epel, R. J. Fletcher, and M. Zwierlein, Crystallization of bosonic quantum hall states in a ro- tating quantum gas, Nature601, 58 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Aschieri, J

    P. Aschieri, J. Madore, P. Manousselis, and G. Zoupanos, Dimensional reduction over fuzzy coset spaces, JHEP04(04), 034, arXiv:hep-th/0310072

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Aschieri, J

    P. Aschieri, J. Madore, P. Manousselis, and G. Zoupanos, Unified theories from fuzzy extra dimensions, Fortsch. Phys.52, 718 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0401200

    2004

  57. [65]

    Balachandran, Quantum space-times in the year 2002, Pramana59, 359 (2002)

    A. Balachandran, Quantum space-times in the year 2002, Pramana59, 359 (2002)

    2002

  58. [66]

    Gavriil, G

    D. Gavriil, G. Manolakos, G. Orfanidis, and G. Zoupanos, Higher-dimensional unification with continuous and fuzzy coset spaces as extra dimensions, Fortschritte der Physik63, 442 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Hasebe, Perfectly spherical bloch hyper-spheres from quantum matrix geometry, Nuclear Physics B1005, 116595 (2024)

    K. Hasebe, Perfectly spherical bloch hyper-spheres from quantum matrix geometry, Nuclear Physics B1005, 116595 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Hasebe, Hopf Maps, Lowest Landau Level, and Fuzzy Spheres, SIGMA6, 071 (2010), arXiv:1009.1192 [hep- th]

    K. Hasebe, Hopf Maps, Lowest Landau Level, and Fuzzy Spheres, SIGMA6, 071 (2010), arXiv:1009.1192 [hep- th]

    2010 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Hasebe, Higher Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect as A-Class Topological Insulator, Nucl

    K. Hasebe, Higher Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect as A-Class Topological Insulator, Nucl. Phys. B886, 952 (2014), arXiv:1403.5066 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Madore, Fuzzy physics, Annals of Physics219, 187 (1992)

    J. Madore, Fuzzy physics, Annals of Physics219, 187 (1992)

    1992

  63. [71]

    Zhang and J.-p

    S.-C. Zhang and J.-p. Hu, A Four-dimensional gener- alization of the quantum Hall effect, Science294, 823 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0110572

    2001 arXiv

  64. [72]

    B. A. Bernevig, C.-H. Chern, J.-P. Hu, N. Toumbas, and S.-C. Zhang, Effective field theory description of the higher dimensional quantum Hall liquid, Annals Phys. 300, 185 (2002), arXiv:cond-mat/0206164

    2002 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture, Phys. Rev. D55, 5112 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9610043

    1997 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Dong and T

    Z. Dong and T. Senthil, Noncommutative field theory and composite fermi liquids in some quantum hall sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B102, 205126 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Patil, A

    V. Patil, A. Banerjee, and A. M. Cook, Microscopic field theories of the quantum skyrmion hall effect (2025), arXiv:2508.16547 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Tong and C

    D. Tong and C. Turner, Quantum hall effect in su- persymmetric chern-simons theories, Phys. Rev. B92, 235125 (2015)

    2015

  69. [77]

    Dorey, D

    N. Dorey, D. Tong, and C. Turner, Matrix model for non-abelian quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. B94, 085114 (2016)

    2016

  70. [78]

    Dorey, D

    N. Dorey, D. Tong, and C. Turner, A matrix model for WZW, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 7 (2016)

    2016

  71. [79]

    Banerjee and A

    A. Banerjee and A. M. Cook, Multiplicative chern insu- lator: Generalized bulk-boundary correspondences, 4π aharonov-bohm effect, and adiabatic evolution to topo- logical skyrmion phase with symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B113, 085105 (2026)

    2026

  72. [80]

    Y. J. Uemura, G. M. Luke, B. J. Sternlieb, J. H. Brewer, J. F. Carolan, W. N. Hardy, R. Kadono, J. R. Kempton, R. F. Kiefl, S. R. Kreitzman, P. Mulhern, T. M. Rise- man, D. L. Williams, B. X. Yang, S. Uchida, H. Takagi, J. Gopalakrishnan, A. W. Sleight, M. A. Subramanian, C. L...

    1989

  73. [81]

    D. S. Fisher and P. C. Hohenberg, Dilute bose gas in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B37, 4936 (1988)

    1988

  74. [82]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe,Topological solitons(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    2004

  75. [83]

    F. D. M. Haldane and Y.-S. Wu, Quantum dynamics and statistics of vortices in two-dimensional superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2887 (1985)

    1985

  76. [84]

    Kastening, Bose-einstein condensation temperature of a homogeneous weakly interacting bose gas in varia- tional perturbation theory through six loops, Phys

    B. Kastening, Bose-einstein condensation temperature of a homogeneous weakly interacting bose gas in varia- tional perturbation theory through six loops, Phys. Rev. A68, 061601(R) (2003)

    2003

  77. [85]

    Kleinert, S

    H. Kleinert, S. Schmidt, and A. Pelster, Reentrant phe- nomenon in the quantum phase transitions of a gas of bosons trapped in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 160402 (2004)

    2004

  78. [86]

    Schick, Two-dimensional system of hard-core bosons, Phys

    M. Schick, Two-dimensional system of hard-core bosons, Phys. Rev. A3, 1067 (1971)

    1971

  79. [87]

    P. B. Weichman, Crossover scaling in a dilute bose su- perfluid near zero temperature, Phys. Rev. B38, 8739 (1988)

    1988

  80. [88]

    M. P. A. Fisher, G. Grinstein, and S. M. Girvin, Pres- ence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions: Universal resistance at the superconductor-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 587 (1990)

    1990

  81. [89]

    D. R. Nelson and J. M. Kosterlitz, Universal jump in the superfluid density of two-dimensional superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 1201 (1977)

    1977

  82. [90]

    Frankel,The geometry of physics: an introduction (Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 2012)

    T. Frankel,The geometry of physics: an introduction (Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 2012)

    2012

  83. [91]

    Szmytkowski, Closed form of the generalized green’s function for the helmholtz operator on the two- dimensional unit sphere, Journal of Mathematical Physics47, 063506 (2006)

    R. Szmytkowski, Closed form of the generalized green’s function for the helmholtz operator on the two- dimensional unit sphere, Journal of Mathematical Physics47, 063506 (2006)

    2006

  84. [92]

    B. A. Ovrut and S. Thomas, Theory of vortices and monopoles on a sphere, Phys. Rev. D43, 1314 (1991)

    1991

  85. [93]

    Stone, Supersymmetry and the quantum mechanics of spin, Nuclear Physics B314, 557 (1989)

    M. Stone, Supersymmetry and the quantum mechanics of spin, Nuclear Physics B314, 557 (1989)

    1989

  86. [94]

    J. P. Gazeau, E. Huguet, M. Lachi` eze-Rey, and J. Re- naud, Fuzzy spheres from inequivalent coherent states quantizations, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 10225 (2007)

    2007

  87. [95]

    Gazeau,Coherent states, wavelets and their gen- eralizations, Vol

    J.-P. Gazeau,Coherent states, wavelets and their gen- eralizations, Vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    2000

  88. [96]

    V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Importance of phase 17 fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density, Nature374, 434 (1995)

    1995

  89. [97]

    Varma, Z

    C. Varma, Z. Nussinov, and W. van Saarloos, Singular or non-fermi liquids, Physics Reports361, 267 (2002)

    2002

  90. [98]

    Zaanen, Y

    J. Zaanen, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, and K. Schalm,Holo- graphic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Y. Guo, E. Mercado Gutierrez, D. Rey, T. Badr, A. Per- rin, L. Longchambon, V. S. Bagnato, H. Perrin, and R. Dubessy, Expansion of a quantum gas in a shell trap, New Journal of Physics24, 093040 (2022)

    2022

  92. [100]

    X.-F. Zhou, C. Wu, G.-C. Guo, R. Wang, H. Pu, and Z.-W. Zhou, Synthetic landau levels and spinor vortex matter on a haldane spherical surface with a magnetic monopole, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 130402 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    Rydow, V

    E. Rydow, V. P. Singh, A. Beregi, E. Chang, L. Mathey, C. J. Foot, and S. Sunami, Observation of a bilayer su- perfluid with interlayer coherence, Nature Communica- tions16, 7201 (2025)

    2025

  94. [102]

    magnetic

    X.-G. Wen and A. Zee, Neutral superfluid modes and “magnetic” monopoles in multilayered quantum hall systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1811 (1992)

    1992

  95. [103]

    I. B. Spielman, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Resonantly enhanced tunneling in a double layer quantum hall ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5808 (2000)

    2000

  96. [104]

    M. M. Fogler and F. Wilczek, Josephson effect without superconductivity: Realization in quantum hall bilay- ers, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1833 (2001)

    2001

  97. [105]

    Balents and L

    L. Balents and L. Radzihovsky, Interlayer tunneling in double-layer quantum hall pseudoferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1825 (2001)

    2001

  98. [106]

    Stern, S

    A. Stern, S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and N. Ma, Theory of interlayer tunneling in bilayer quantum hall ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1829 (2001)

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.