Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 145 references

This paper claims that the empirical power law linking coronal temperature to X-ray surface flux in nearby FGK stars follows naturally from the RTV scaling law for quasi-static coronal loops, producing a predicted slope of about 0.26–0.31 t

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

The X-ray temperature-brightness relation of nearby FGK stars is explained by the RTV coronal-loop scaling law, with a nearly universal loop-length-to-filling-factor ratio.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful volume-limited X-ray catalogue and a plausible empirical calibration, but the RTV slope derivation has a band-pass mismatch that needs fixing before the central claim holds. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27832 v1 pith:NF7AD4EX submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.SR

The X-ray catalogue of FGK stars within 10 pc: The coronal temperature-brightness relation explained with the RTV scaling law

M. M. Bennedik , B. Stelzer , M. Caramazza , S. Orlando , A. Binks , J. Robrade This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords stellar X-ray coronaetemperature-brightness relationRTV scaling lawcoronal loopsFGK stars within 10 pccoronal filling factorMaunder minimum starsX-ray variability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a nearly complete X-ray catalogue of the 60 FGK main-sequence stars within 10 pc, using ROSAT, eROSITA, and XMM-Newton data with careful handling of binary systems and optical loading. Its central result is that the well-known power-law relation between coronal temperature and X-ray surface flux, T ∝ F^b, is not merely empirical: the slope follows from the RTV scaling law for quasi-static coronal loops, which predicts b ≈ 0.26–0.31, matching the observed 0.19–0.33. The authors argue that the small scatter of the relation implies a nearly universal ratio of loop length to filling factor across the sample, with three exceptions attributed to atypically long or sparse loops. If correct, this turns the temperature-brightness relation into a physics-based proxy for coronal temperature that can be applied to fainter, more distant stars where spectral fitting is impossible. It would also unify solar and stellar coronae: the same loop physics that sets the properties of solar active regions and cores appears to set the global temperature-brightness plane of late-type stars.

Core claim

The paper claims, for the first time, that the empirical slopes of the coronal temperature-brightness relation arise naturally from the RTV scaling law. Starting from the emission-measure expression F_X ∝ f (p/T)^2 L Λ(T) and the RTV law T ∝ (pL)^{1/3}, with the cooling function approximated as Λ ∝ T^{-m}, the authors derive T ∝ (F_X L/f)^{1/(4-m)}. For m between 0.2 and 0.8 this predicts a slope b = 1/(4-m) of 0.26–0.31, in agreement with the power-law fits to the sample (b ≈ 0.19–0.33 depending on instrument and treatment of unresolved binaries). The small observed scatter indicates that the ratio L/f of loop length to filling factor is nearly constant across the FGK 10 pc sample; the thre

What carries the argument

The central object is the RTV scaling law for quasi-static coronal loops, which relates the apex temperature of a loop to its pressure and length as T ∝ (pL)^{1/3}. Combining this with the definition of emission measure and a power-law approximation of the radiative cooling function yields Eq. 7, T ∝ (F_X L/f)^{1/(4-m)}, which directly predicts the observed slope of the temperature-brightness relation. The machinery works by converting an observable surface flux into a predicted coronal temperature, and its robustness comes from the weak dependence of the exponent 1/(4-m) on the poorly known cooling-function exponent m.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that a star's unresolved, multi-temperature corona can be represented by a single characteristic loop with one effective length and filling factor, so that the measured emission-measure-weighted temperature can stand in for the apex temperature of that loop.

What would settle it

Measure the temperature-brightness slope for a sample of stars whose loop lengths are estimated independently, e.g., from the decay times of large flares or from eclipse mapping of active stars. If the slope differs from 1/(4-m) ≈ 0.26–0.31, or if the inferred L/f varies systematically with surface flux rather than staying roughly constant, then the RTV-based explanation and the universal-L/f inference would be refuted.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Coronal temperatures for X-ray-faint stars can be estimated from a measured flux using the calibrated power law, without needing a spectrum; the paper provides instrument-specific calibrations for this purpose.
  • The near-constancy of L/f across the sample implies that as stars become more active, their dominant coronal loops grow longer and cover more surface in a correlated way, so the coronal geometry is regulated by the dynamo.
  • The temperature-brightness relation is slightly instrument-dependent: eROSITA and XMM-Newton yield different normalisations and slopes, so cross-calibration matters for any survey combining the two.
  • Coronal temperature and X-ray brightness evolve together through activity cycles and flares, meaning cycle phase must be accounted for when using the relation to infer temperatures.
  • The low-activity end of the relation is anchored by a Maunder-minimum star, and three other nearby stars occupy the same region; identifying more such stars would map the floor of coronal activity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the RTV explanation is correct, the relation should extend to M dwarfs, but their lower surface fluxes and different magnetic field strengths might shift the effective L/f; this can be tested by extending the same analysis to the 10 pc M-dwarf sample.
  • The universal L/f ratio might be a manifestation of magnetic flux balance: the same amount of magnetic flux emerging from the surface could set both the size and the coverage of loops. This could be tested against Zeeman-Doppler imaging maps of surface magnetic fields, which measure filling factor independently.
  • The three outliers could be natural laboratories for loop physics; measuring their loop lengths directly from flare decay timescales would distinguish longer loops from smaller filling factors, since the two would predict different flare light-curve shapes.
  • The instrument offset between eROSITA and XMM-Newton could be calibrated empirically by observing the same stars simultaneously; such cross-calibration would make the temperature-brightness relation usable across surveys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a volume-limited X-ray survey of FGK main-sequence stars within 10 pc, combining ROSAT, eROSITA, and XMM-Newton data with a homogeneous spectral analysis. It derives X-ray surface fluxes and emission-measure-weighted coronal temperatures, fits the empirical kT-FX power-law relation separately for eROSITA and XMM-Newton, compares with solar coronal structures, identifies possible Maunder-minimum stars, and studies cycle/flare variability. The central new claim is that the observed slope of this relation follows from the RTV loop scaling law, T ∝ (FX L/f)^(1/(4−m)), implying a nearly universal ratio L/f in the sample.

Significance. The empirical catalogue is a valuable community resource: volume-limited, 95% complete, with explicit treatment of multiplicity, optical loading, flares, and instrumental cross-calibration. The XMM-Newton relation agrees with earlier high-resolution results, which is useful for converting fluxes to temperatures. If the RTV derivation is correct, it would provide a physical basis for the temperature-brightness relation and constrain coronal loop geometry. The paper is honest about limitations (Sect. 5.3), but the central derivation has a load-bearing band-pass issue and an unvalidated effective-loop assumption.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Eqs. (4)–(7) and §5.3.1] The derivation identifies the cooling function Λ(T) with the total radiative loss function (Fig. 8). However, the empirical FX in Eq. (3) and Table 1 is the 0.1–2.4 keV ROSAT-band surface flux (Sect. 3.3), not the bolometric X-ray flux. In Eqs. (4)–(6), the quantity that enters the observed FX is the band-limited emissivity Λ_band(T). For the 0.1–0.5 keV temperatures of this sample, the band fraction rises steeply with T, so Λ_band(T) increases with T; its effective exponent m in Λ∝T^{-m} is negative, not +0.2–0.8. Using m≈−1 in Eq. (7) gives b≈0.2, close to the eROSITA slopes in Table 1, not the XMM-Newton slope 0.29. The agreement claimed in §5.1 is therefore not demonstrated for the actually measured band. Please recompute the prediction using a band-limited cooling function (e.g., APEC emissivity integrated over 0.1–2.4 keV) and revisit the conclusion.
  2. [§5.1 and Table 1] The statement that the predicted slopes b≈0.26–0.31 are in 'remarkable agreement with the empirical slopes we obtained ... (see Table 1)' is only true for the XMM-Newton row (b=0.290). The eROSITA rows have b=0.242±0.011 and b=0.191±0.020, both outside the predicted range. Since the eROSITA versus XMM-Newton difference is one of the paper's quantitative results (Sect. 4.2), the RTV derivation must either explain both slopes or show quantitatively how the instrumental response biases the measured slope. As written, the central claim covers only a subset of the data.
  3. [§5.3.2 and Eq. (2)] The measured kT is an emission-measure-weighted mean over the whole unresolved corona (Eq. 2), whereas the RTV law applies to the apex temperature of an individual quasi-static loop. The derivation requires that this mean can be represented by a single effective loop with one (L,f); this is acknowledged as a 'statistical' approximation, but it is load-bearing. If the dominant loop population changes with activity level, the effective exponents in Eq. (7) need not coincide with the single-loop RTV value. Please test the effective-loop assumption, e.g., by constructing an ensemble of RTV-scaled loops with a distribution of L and f and checking that its EM-weighted T follows the same power law with the observed scatter. Without such a test, the inferred universal L/f (§5.3.3) depends on an unvalidated identification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1.3, Eq. (1)] The expression '12.0 5−G' appears to be missing superscript formatting; please clarify the intended formula.
  2. [Table 2] The second column header repeats 'logF X,min'; presumably one of the columns should be 'logF X,max'.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] Please define the abbreviations CH, BKC, AR, CO in the caption, as they are central to the comparison.
  4. [§5.2, Eq. (9)] The estimate that 61 Cyg B has a 4–7 times larger L/f assumes the same slope b and m as the bulk relation. Given the sparse data and possible abundance differences, a brief caveat would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the RTV slope derivation uses external scaling and cooling-function inputs, with acknowledged statistical approximations.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation (Sect. 5.1, Eqs. 4-7) is self-contained: it combines the external RTV scaling law T ∝ (pL)^{1/3} with the radiative loss function Λ(T) ∝ T^{-m} to obtain T ∝ (F_X L/f)^{1/(4-m)}; none of the observed kT-F_X slopes from Table 1 enter as inputs. The exponent m is an approximation to the external cooling function; Sect. 5.3.1 explicitly states that the m values are 'not the result of a formal fit' but bracket the cooling function, so the predicted slope range is not calibrated to the target relation. L/f enters only through the normalization/offset (Eq. 8), not the slope, and the small scatter is inferred as evidence for an approximately universal L/f rather than being imposed. The paper also acknowledges the main modeling assumption - that the EM-weighted measured temperature is not the apex temperature of a single loop (Sect. 5.3.2) - and treats the RTV comparison as statistical; this limits the strength of the claim but is not circular. Self-citations (Bennedik et al. 2026; Robrade et al. 2026) support sample definition, count-rate conversion, and optical-loading correction, none of which carry the RTV slope argument. The band-limited versus bolometric cooling-function concern raised by the skeptic is a physical/correctness issue, not a circularity: it does not make the empirical temperature-brightness relation an input to the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central RTV derivation rests on two unmeasured quantities: the cooling-function exponent m (chosen over a bracketing range) and the effective loop length/filling-factor ratio L/f (assumed universal, and inferred for outliers). No new physical entities are introduced. Standard domain assumptions about coronal abundances and the representativeness of the 10 pc sample are also invoked.

free parameters (2)
  • Cooling-function exponent m = 0.2–0.8 (representative values 0.2, 0.5, 0.8)
    Appears in Λ(T) ∝ T^(−m) and sets the predicted slope b=1/(4−m). The paper does not measure m; it selects values by visual bracketing of the radiative-loss curve (Sect. 5.3.1, Fig. 8). The central value 0.5 yields b≈0.29, matching the XMM-Newton fit.
  • Effective loop-length/filling-factor ratio L/f = Universal for the bulk sample; inferred 4–7× larger for 61 Cyg B and 3–5× larger for 61 Cyg A
    Enters Eq. 7 as the offset term. The paper assumes L/f does not vary systematically across most of the sample (Sect. 5.3.3) and uses Eq. 9 to convert temperature offsets of outliers into L/f ratios. No direct measurement of loop length or filling factor is made.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption RTV scaling law T ∝ (pL)^(1/3) for quasi-static coronal loops
    Used in Sect. 5.1 to derive Eq. 7. Assumes energy balance between volumetric heating, thermal conduction, and radiative losses in hydrostatic loops.
  • domain assumption The coronal cooling function can be approximated as Λ(T) ∝ T^(−m) with m in [0.2, 0.8] over the relevant temperature range
    Sect. 5.3.1 acknowledges this is a coarse approximation with no unique m; the chosen range brackets the cooling curve by eye.
  • ad hoc to paper The unresolved emission-measure-weighted mean temperature can be represented by a single characteristic loop population with effective L and f
    Sect. 5.3.2 explicitly labels this a statistical approximation. It is required for the RTV derivation to apply to ensemble-averaged stellar data.
  • ad hoc to paper Characteristic loop length and filling factor do not vary systematically across the sample (L/f is nearly universal)
    Sect. 5.3.3 infers this from the small scatter after outlier exclusion, rather than from direct measurement. It is load-bearing for the claim of universal loop scaling.
  • domain assumption Global coronal abundance Z = 0.3 Zsun for all sample stars
    Adopted in Sect. 3.3 for all APEC/vapec fits; typical for stellar coronae. Affects derived emission measures and therefore the X-ray surface fluxes entering the relation.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The X-ray catalogue of FGK stars within 10 pc: The coronal temperature-brightness relation explained with the RTV scaling law." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NF7AD4EX

@misc{pith2026260727832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The X-ray catalogue of FGK stars within 10 pc: The coronal temperature-brightness relation explained with the RTV scaling law},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NF7AD4EX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27832}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A comprehensive measurement of stellar X-ray emission has important implications for our understanding of stellar dynamos, exoplanet atmosphere loss, and evaporation of protoplanetary disks. We present a catalogue of X-ray detections of the FGK-type main-sequence stars within 10 pc, which accounts for stellar multiplicity and optical loading of the detectors. To build the X-ray catalogue, we analysed all observations from SRG (Spectrum Roentgen Gamma)/eROSITA and XMM-Newton for stars in the FGK 10pc sample, and we cross-matched the sample with ROSAT catalogues. We fit thermal plasma models to the X-ray spectra to derive X-ray fluxes and coronal temperatures. We investigate the relation between coronal temperature and X-ray surface flux and find the result to be consistent with the ranges covered by different types of solar coronal magnetic structures. The lower end of the temperature-brightness relation is defined by the Maunder minimum star HD 166620 and three other stars whose positions identify them as possible Maunder minimum candidates. We identify systematic differences between the temperature-brightness law derived from XMM-Newton and eROSITA data that we attribute to their different instrumental response functions. We study the impact of both short-term flaring and long-term activity cycles on the evolution of coronal temperature along with X-ray brightness. With the exception of three stars, a remarkably small scatter is observed in the temperature-brightness relation across the whole sample. A natural explanation of the empirical kT-FX relation is provided by the RTV scaling law defined for solar magnetic loops. The small spread of the observed relation indicates a universal scaling between the length and the filling factor of coronal loops. The three observed outliers deviate from this invariance of the ratio of loop length to filling factor for an as of yet unknown reason.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27832 by A. Binks, B. Stelzer, J. Robrade, M. Caramazza, M. M. Bennedik, S. Orlando.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Gaia colour-magnitude diagram for the complete 10 pc catalogue by Reylé et al. (2021) with the FGK 10pc sample. Excluded from the sample are the subgiants. The M0-dwarf HD 232979 is included in the sample. Faint sources with MG ≲ 17 mag have unreliable photometry. González-Payo et al. (2026) shows agreement for all systems in the FGK 10pc sample, except for HD 50281, where the close bi￾nary low-mass compan… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: eRASS:5 count rate versus G magnitude in the FGK 10pc sam￾ple. For unresolved multiple systems, we show the sum of the G-band flux and the earliest SpT of the unresolved stars. We discard eRASS data within the purple striped area due to optical loading and examine stars within the grey striped area (see text in Sect. 3.1.3 for details). Red and black annuli indicate discarded and partially affected objects… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: EPIC/pn light curve of 61 Cyg B as an example for our by-eye separation of quiescent and flaring time intervals. The blue points define the quiescent state and the red points are ascribed to the flaring state. The lower and upper errors are computed as the 16th and 84th percentiles of Monte-Carlo simulations with 10 000 iterations where each sample is drawn from a two-piece normal distribu￾tion of the unce… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coronal mean temperature versus X-ray surface flux for all XMM-Newton and eROSITA observations. For XMM-Newton data representing quiescent and flaring states are distinguished. For eRASS the individual surveys are shown. Two stars that appear as clear outliers in their quiescent phase are marked in grey. Typical FX and kT ranges for different types of magnetic structures on the Sun are shown as colored box… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: X-ray temperature-brightness relation excluding two systems with peculiar behavior marked in grey in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time series of spectral parameters from XMM-Newton observations (squares) for a) αCen A&B, b) ϵ Eri, c) 61 Cyg A, and d) 61 Cyg B. Flares are shown with grey crosses. eRASS detections of ϵ Eri are shown with green circles. Upper panels: X-ray surface flux. Middle panels: Mean coronal temperature. Lower panels: Evolution of kT-FX. Flares and error bars not shown in lower panels for clarity. 5.2. Explanation… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Coronal cooling function (solid line) and approximations with power laws with varied exponents. 5.3.1. Approximation of the radiative loss function Our parametrisation of the radiative loss function of the corona as a power law in temperature is only a coarse description of the actual cooling function which changes continuously with tem￾perature (e.g. Raymond et al. 1976; Raymond & Smith 1977). As a result… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Wright, Jason T

    Luhn, Jacob K. and Wright, Jason T. and Henry, Gregory W. and Saar, Steven H. and Baum, Anna C. , journal =. HD 166620: Portrait of a Star Entering a Grand Magnetic Minimum , year =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8b13 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8b13 2041

  2. [2]

    and Arlt, Rainer and Asvestari, Eleanna and Hawkins, Ed and Käpylä, Maarit and Kovaltsov, Gennady A

    Usoskin, Ilya G. and Arlt, Rainer and Asvestari, Eleanna and Hawkins, Ed and Käpylä, Maarit and Kovaltsov, Gennady A. and Krivova, Natalie and Lockwood, Michael and Mursula, Kalevi and O’Reilly, Jezebel and Owens, Matthew and Scott, Chris J. and Sokoloff, Dmitry D. and Solanki, Sami K. and Soon, Willie and Vaquero, José M. , journal =. The Maunder minimum...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526652

  3. [3]

    Baliunas, S. L. and Donahue, R. A. and Soon, W. H. and Horne, J. H. and Frazer, J. and Woodard-Eklund, L. and Bradford, M. and Rao, L. M. and Wilson, O. C. and Zhang, Q. and Bennett, W. and Briggs, J. and Carroll, S. M. and Duncan, D. K. and Figueroa, D. and Lanning, H. H. and Misch, T. and Mueller, J. and Noyes, R. W. and Poppe, D. and Porter, A. C. and ...

  4. [4]

    and Wright, Jason T

    Shah, Shivani P. and Wright, Jason T. and Isaacson, Howard and Howard, Andrew W. and Curtis, Jason L. , journal =. HD 4915: A Maunder Minimum Candidate , year =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad40c , publisher =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad40c 2041

  5. [5]

    and Buccino, A

    Flores Trivigno, M. and Buccino, A. P. and González, E. and Colombo, P. D. and González, C. and Jaque Arancibia, M. and Ibañez Bustos, R. V. and Saffe, C. and Miquelarena, P. and Alacoria, J. and Collado, A. , journal =. No Maunder Minimum phase in HD 4915 , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452023 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452023

  6. [6]

    and Robrade, J

    Poppenhäger, K. and Robrade, J. and Schmitt, J. H. M. M. and Hall, J. C. , journal =. 51 Pegasi – a planet-bearing Maunder minimum candidate , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912945 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912945

  7. [7]

    and Wright, Jason T

    Baum, Anna C. and Wright, Jason T. and Luhn, Jacob K. and Isaacson, Howard , journal =. Five Decades of Chromospheric Activity in 59 Sun-like Stars and New Maunder Minimum Candidate HD 166620 , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5683 , publisher =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5683

  8. [8]

    and Kővári, Zs

    Oláh, K. and Kővári, Zs. and Petrovay, K. and Soon, W. and Baliunas, S. and Kolláth, Z. and Vida, K. , journal =. Magnetic cycles at different ages of stars , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628479 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628479

  9. [9]

    Wright, J. T. , journal =. Do We Know of Any Maunder Minimum Stars? , year =. doi:10.1086/423221 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/423221

  10. [10]

    and Jaque Arancibia, M

    Flores, M. and Jaque Arancibia, M. and Ibañez Bustos, R. V. and Buccino, A. P. and Yana Galarza, J. and Nuñez, N. E. and Miquelarena, P. and Alacoria, J. and Saffe, C. and Mauas, P. J. D. , journal =. Detecting prolonged activity minima in binary stars: The case of ζ2 Reticuli , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039902 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039902

  11. [11]

    Schmitt, J. H. M. M. and Liefke, C. , journal =. NEXXUS: A comprehensive ROSAT survey of coronal X-ray emission among nearby solar-like stars , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030495 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030495

  12. [12]

    parsec: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code: parsec:tracks and isochrones , year =

    Bressan, Alessandro and Marigo, Paola and Girardi, Léo and Salasnich, Bernardo and Dal Cero, Claudia and Rubele, Stefano and Nanni, Ambra , journal =. parsec: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code: parsec:tracks and isochrones , year =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x , publisher =

    arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Nguyen, C. T. and Costa, G. and Girardi, L. and Volpato, G. and Bressan, A. and Chen, Y. and Marigo, P. and Fu, X. and Goudfrooij, P. , journal =. PARSEC V2.0: Stellar tracks and isochrones of low- and intermediate-mass stars with rotation , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244166 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244166

  14. [14]

    and Stelzer, B

    Magaudda, E. and Stelzer, B. and Covey, K. R. and Raetz, St. and Matt, S. P. and Scholz, A. , journal =. Relation of X-ray activity and rotation in M dwarfs and predicted time-evolution of the X-ray luminosity , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937408 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937408

  15. [15]

    and Stelzer, B

    Caramazza, M. and Stelzer, B. and Magaudda, E. and Raetz, St. and Güdel, M. and Orlando, S. and Poppenhäger, K. , journal =. Complete X-ray census of M dwarfs in the solar neighborhood: I. GJ 745 AB: Coronal-hole stars in the 10 pc sample , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346470 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346470

  16. [16]

    and Jardine, K

    Reylé, C. and Jardine, K. and Fouqué, P. and Caballero, J. A. and Smart, R. L. and Sozzetti, A. , journal =. The 10 parsec sample in the Gaia era , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140985 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140985

  17. [17]

    and Mamajek, Eric E

    Pecaut, Mark J. and Mamajek, Eric E. , journal =. INTRINSIC COLORS, TEMPERATURES, AND BOLOMETRIC CORRECTIONS OF PRE-MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS , year =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 , publisher =

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

  18. [18]

    and Orlando, S

    Peres, G. and Orlando, S. and Reale, F. and Rosner, R. and Hudson, H. , journal =. The Sun as an X‐Ray Star. II. Using theYohkoh/Soft X‐Ray Telescope–derived Solar Emission Measure versus Temperature to Interpret Stellar X‐Ray Observations , year =. doi:10.1086/308136 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/308136

  19. [19]

    and Freyberg, M

    Boller, Th. and Freyberg, M. J. and Trümper, J. and Haberl, F. and Voges, W. and Nandra, K. , journal =. Second ROSAT all-sky survey (2RXS) source catalogue , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525648 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525648

  20. [20]

    1995 , month = may, pages =

    A&A , title =. 1995 , month = may, pages =

    1995

  21. [21]

    The Second ROSAT Source Catalog of Pointed Observations , year =

  22. [22]

    Webb, N. A. and Coriat, M. and Traulsen, I. and Ballet, J. and Motch, C. and Carrera, F. J. and Koliopanos, F. and Authier, J. and de la Calle, I. and Ceballos, M. T. and Colomo, E. and Chuard, D. and Freyberg, M. and Garcia, T. and Kolehmainen, M. and Lamer, G. and Lin, D. and Maggi, P. and Michel, L. and Page, C. G. and Page, M. J. and Perea-Calderon, J...

  23. [23]

    and Creevey, O

    Soubiran, C. and Creevey, O. L. and Lagarde, N. and Brouillet, N. and Jofré, P. and Casamiquela, L. and Heiter, U. and Aguilera-Gómez, C. and Vitali, S. and Worley, C. and de Brito Silva, D. , journal =. Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Fundamental Teff and log g of the third version , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347136 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347136

  24. [24]

    Vaughan, A. H. and Preston, G. W. and Wilson, O. C. , journal =. Flux measurements of CA II H and K emission , year =. doi:10.1086/130324 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/130324

  25. [25]

    Järvinen, S. P. and Strassmeier, K. G. , journal =. A search for Maunder-minimum candidate stars , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554111 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554111

  26. [26]

    and Radovan, Matthew and Kibrick, Robert and Butler, R

    Vogt, Steven S. and Radovan, Matthew and Kibrick, Robert and Butler, R. Paul and Alcott, Barry and Allen, Steve and Arriagada, Pamela and Bolte, Mike and Burt, Jennifer and Cabak, Jerry and Chloros, Kostas and Cowley, David and Deich, William and Dupraw, Brian and Earthman, Wayne and Epps, Harland and Faber, Sandra and Fischer, Debra and Gates, Elinor and...

  27. [27]

    and Fulton, Benjamin and Petigura, Erik A

    Isaacson, Howard and Howard, Andrew W. and Fulton, Benjamin and Petigura, Erik A. and Weiss, Lauren M. and Kane, Stephen R. and Carter, Brad and Beard, Corey and Giacalone, Steven and Van Zandt, Judah and Murphy, Joseph M. Akana and Dai, Fei and Chontos, Ashley and Polanski, Alex S. and Rice, Malena and Lubin, Jack and Brinkman, Casey and Rubenzahl, Ryan ...

  28. [28]

    and Brouillet, N

    Soubiran, C. and Brouillet, N. and Casamiquela, L. , journal =. Assessment of [Fe/H] determinations for FGK stars in spectroscopic surveys , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142409 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142409

  29. [29]

    and Ballering, Nicholas , journal =

    Gáspár, András and Rieke, George H. and Ballering, Nicholas , journal =. THE CORRELATION BETWEEN METALLICITY AND DEBRIS DISK MASS , year =. doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/171 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/171

  30. [30]

    Sousa, S. G. and Santos, N. C. and Mayor, M. and Udry, S. and Casagrande, L. and Israelian, G. and Pepe, F. and Queloz, D. and Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G. , journal =. Spectroscopic parameters for 451 stars in the HARPS GTO planet search program: Stellar [Fe/H] and the frequency of exo-Neptunes , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809698 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809698

  31. [31]

    and Tabernero, H

    Marfil, E. and Tabernero, H. M. and Montes, D. and Caballero, J. A. and Lázaro, F. J. and González Hernández, J. I. and Nagel, E. and Passegger, V. M. and Schweitzer, A. and Ribas, I. and Reiners, A. and Quirrenbach, A. and Amado, P. J. and Cifuentes, C. and Cortés-Contreras, M. and Dreizler, S. and Duque-Arribas, C. and Galadí-Enríquez, D. and Henning, T...

  32. [32]

    and Feltzing, S

    Bensby, T. and Feltzing, S. and Oey, M. S. , journal =. Exploring the Milky Way stellar disk: A detailed elemental abundance study of 714 F and G dwarf stars in the solar neighbourhood , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631

  33. [33]

    and Lind, K

    Buder, S. and Lind, K. and Ness, M. K. and Asplund, M. and Duong, L. and Lin, J. and Kos, J. and Casagrande, L. and Casey, A. R. and Bland-Hawthorn, J. and De Silva, G. M. and D’Orazi, V. and Freeman, K. C. and Martell, S. L. and Schlesinger, K. J. and Sharma, S. and Simpson, J. D. and Zucker, D. B. and Zwitter, T. and Čotar, K. and Dotter, A. and Hayden,...

  34. [34]

    2012 , editor =

    Comparative Magnetic Minima: Characterizing Quiet Times in the Sun and Stars , title =. 2012 , editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921312005005 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921312005005 2012

  35. [35]

    and Peres, G

    Orlando, S. and Peres, G. and Reale, F. , journal =. The Sun as an X‐Ray Star. IV. The Contribution of Different Regions of the Corona to Its X‐Ray Spectrum , year =. doi:10.1086/322333 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1086/322333

  36. [36]

    and Peres, G

    Orlando, S. and Peres, G. and Reale, F. , journal =. The Sun as an X-ray star: Active region evolution, rotational modulation, and implications for stellar X-ray variability , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040207 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040207

  37. [37]

    Jacques and Scott, Pat , journal =

    Asplund, Martin and Grevesse, Nicolas and Sauval, A. Jacques and Scott, Pat , journal =. The Chemical Composition of the Sun , year =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , publisher =

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    2000 , month = jan, pages =

    A&A , title =. 2000 , month = jan, pages =. arXiv , doi =:astro-ph/9909491 , keywords =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  39. [39]

    van den Besselaar, E. J. M. and Raassen, A. J. J. and Mewe, R. and van der Meer, R. L. J. and Güdel, M. and Audard, M. , journal =. AD Leonis: Flares observed by XMM-Newton and Chandra , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031398 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031398

  40. [40]

    and Schmitt, J

    Robrade, J. and Schmitt, J. H. M. M. , journal =. X-ray properties of active M dwarfs as observed by XMM-Newton , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041941 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041941

  41. [41]

    and Flaccomio, E

    Maggio, A. and Flaccomio, E. and Favata, F. and Micela, G. and Sciortino, S. and Feigelson, E. D. and Getman, K. V. , journal =. Coronal Abundances in Orion Nebula Cluster Stars , year =. doi:10.1086/513088 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/513088

  42. [42]

    Fisher, R. A. , journal =. On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P , year =. doi:10.2307/2340521 , publisher =

    doi:10.2307/2340521

  43. [43]

    and Andritschke, R

    Predehl, P. and Andritschke, R. and Arefiev, V. and Babyshkin, V. and Batanov, O. and Becker, W. and Böhringer, H. and Bogomolov, A. and Boller, T. and Borm, K. and Bornemann, W. and Bräuninger, H. and Brüggen, M. and Brunner, H. and Brusa, M. and Bulbul, E. and Buntov, M. and Burwitz, V. and Burkert, W. and Clerc, N. and Churazov, E. and Coutinho, D. and...

  44. [44]

    2023 , issn =

    A&A , title =. 2023 , issn =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 2023

  45. [45]

    and Sôma, Mitsuru and Besser, Bruno P

    Hayakawa, Hisashi and Lockwood, Mike and Owens, Matthew J. and Sôma, Mitsuru and Besser, Bruno P. and van Driel-Gesztelyi, Lidia , journal =. Graphical evidence for the solar coronal structure during the Maunder minimum: comparative study of the total eclipse drawings in 1706 and 1715 , year =. doi:10.1051/swsc/2020035 , publisher =

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    Adithya, H. N. and Kariyappa, Rangaiah and Shinsuke, Imada and Kanya, Kusano and Zender, Joe and Damé, Luc and Gabriel, Giono and DeLuca, Edward and Weber, Mark , journal =. Solar Soft X-ray Irradiance Variability, I: Segmentation of Hinode/XRT Full-Disk Images and Comparison with GOES (1 – 8 Å) X-Ray Flux , year =. doi:10.1007/s11207-021-01785-6 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-021-01785-6

  47. [47]

    Nguyen, C. T. and Costa, G. and Bressan, A. and Girardi, L. and Cescutti, G. and Korn, A. J. and Volpato, G. and Chen, Y. and Pastorelli, G. and Trabucchi, M. and Shepherd, K. G. and Ettorre, G. and Zaggia, S. , journal =. PARSEC V2.0: Rotating tracks and isochrones for seven additional metallicities in the range Z = 0.0001–0.03 , year =. doi:10.1051/0004...

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556005

  48. [48]

    Coronal Loops: Observations and Modeling of Confined Plasma , year =

    Reale, Fabio , journal =. Coronal Loops: Observations and Modeling of Confined Plasma , year =. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2014-4 , publisher =

    doi:10.12942/lrsp-2014-4 2014

  49. [49]

    and Preibisch, T

    Zhu, E. and Preibisch, T. , journal =. X-ray activity of nearby G-, K-, and M-type stars and implications for planet habitability around M stars , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452057 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452057

  50. [50]

    and Lamer, G

    Merloni, A. and Lamer, G. and Liu, T. and Ramos-Ceja, M. E. and Brunner, H. and Bulbul, E. and Dennerl, K. and Doroshenko, V. and Freyberg, M. J. and Friedrich, S. and Gatuzz, E. and Georgakakis, A. and Haberl, F. and Igo, Z. and Kreykenbohm, I. and Liu, A. and Maitra, C. and Malyali, A. and Mayer, M. G. F. and Nandra, K. and Predehl, P. and Robrade, J. a...

  51. [51]

    Johnstone, C. P. and Bartel, M. and Güdel, M. , journal =. The active lives of stars: A complete description of the rotation and XUV evolution of F, G, K, and M dwarfs , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038407 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038407

  52. [52]

    and Robrade, J

    Freund, S. and Robrade, J. and Schneider, P. C. and Schmitt, J. H. M. M. , journal =. The stellar content of the XMM-Newton slew survey , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732009 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732009

  53. [53]

    and Stelzer, B

    Magaudda, E. and Stelzer, B. and Raetz, St. and Klutsch, A. and Salvato, M. and Wolf, J. , journal =. First eROSITA study of nearby M dwarfs and the rotation-activity relation in combination with TESS , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141617 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141617

  54. [54]

    Broadband maps of eROSITA and their comparison with the ROSAT survey , year =

    Zheng, Xueying and Ponti, Gabriele and Freyberg, Michael and Sanders, Jeremy and Locatelli, Nicola and Merloni, Andrea and Strong, Andy and Sasaki, Manami and Comparat, Johan and Becker, Werner and Kerp, Juergen and Maitra, Chandreyee and Liu, Teng and Predehl, Peter and Anastasopoulou, Konstantina and Lamer, Georg , journal =. Broadband maps of eROSITA a...

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346576

  55. [55]

    and Brickhouse, Nancy S

    Smith, Randall K. and Brickhouse, Nancy S. and Liedahl, Duane A. and Raymond, John C. , journal =. Collisional Plasma Models with APEC/APED: Emission-Line Diagnostics of Hydrogen-like and Helium-like Ions , year =. doi:10.1086/322992 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/322992

  56. [56]

    and Flaccomio, Ettore and Getman, Konstantin and Micela, Giusi and Sciortino, Salvatore and Stassun, Keivan and Stelzer, Beate and Zinnecker, Hans , journal =

    Preibisch, Thomas and Kim, Yong‐Cheol and Favata, Fabio and Feigelson, Eric D. and Flaccomio, Ettore and Getman, Konstantin and Micela, Giusi and Sciortino, Salvatore and Stassun, Keivan and Stelzer, Beate and Zinnecker, Hans , journal =. The Origin of T Tauri X‐Ray Emission: New Insights from the Chandra Orion Ultradeep Project , year =. doi:10.1086/4328...

    doi:10.1086/432891

  57. [57]

    and Fischer, Debra A

    Brewer, John M. and Fischer, Debra A. and Valenti, Jeff A. and Piskunov, Nikolai , journal =. SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF COOL STARS: EXTENDED ABUNDANCE ANALYSIS OF 1,617 PLANET-SEARCH STARS , year =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/32 , publisher =

    doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/32

  58. [58]

    Stellar activity analysis of Barnard’s Star: Very slow rotation and evidence for long-term activity cycle , year =

    Toledo-Padrón, B and Hernández, J I González and Rodríguez-López, C and Mascareño, A Suárez and Rebolo, R and Butler, R P and Ribas, I and Anglada-Escudé, G and Johnson, E N and Reiners, A and Caballero, J A and Quirrenbach, A and Amado, P J and Béjar, V J S and Morales, J C and Perger, M and Jeffers, S V and Vogt, S and Teske, J and Shectman, S and Crane...

  59. [59]

    and van Saders, Jennifer L

    Metcalfe, Travis S. and van Saders, Jennifer L. and Pinsonneault, Marc H. and Ayres, Thomas R. and Kochukhov, Oleg and Stassun, Keivan G. and Finley, Adam J. and See, Victor and Ilyin, Ilya V. and Strassmeier, Klaus G. , journal =. Weakened Magnetic Braking Signals the Collapse of the Global Stellar Dynamo , year =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae03bc , publisher =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae03bc 2041

  60. [60]

    Dynamo modelling for cycle variability and occurrence of grand minima in Sun-like stars: rotation rate dependence , year =

    Vashishth, Vindya and Karak, Bidya Binay and Kitchatinov, Leonid , journal =. Dynamo modelling for cycle variability and occurrence of grand minima in Sun-like stars: rotation rate dependence , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1105 , publisher =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1105

  61. [61]

    and Ceillier, Tugdual and Metcalfe, Travis S

    van Saders, Jennifer L. and Ceillier, Tugdual and Metcalfe, Travis S. and Aguirre, Victor Silva and Pinsonneault, Marc H. and García, Rafael A. and Mathur, Savita and Davies, Guy R. , journal =. Weakened magnetic braking as the origin of anomalously rapid rotation in old field stars , year =. doi:10.1038/nature16168 , publisher =

    doi:10.1038/nature16168

  62. [62]

    Bennedik, M. M. and Stelzer, B. and Isaacson, H. and Binks, A. and Caramazza, M. and Haberl, F. , journal =. Quiet, but not silent: The X-ray activity of the Maunder minimum star HD 166620 , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558202 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558202

  63. [63]

    ascl , author =:2101.014 , howpublished =

    PyXspec: Python interface to XSPEC spectral-fitting program , year =. ascl , author =:2101.014 , howpublished =

  64. [64]

    and Sanders, Jeremy and Caramazza, Marilena and Sasaki, Manami and Merloni, Andrea and Robrade, Jan and Liu, Teng and Zhang, He-shou and Mayer, Martin G

    Zheng, Xueying and Ponti, Gabriele and Locatelli, Nicola and Stelzer, Beate and Magaudda, Enza and Dennerl, Konrad and Freyberg, Michael J. and Sanders, Jeremy and Caramazza, Marilena and Sasaki, Manami and Merloni, Andrea and Robrade, Jan and Liu, Teng and Zhang, He-shou and Mayer, Martin G. F. and Zhang, Yi and Yeung, Michael C. H. and Becker, Werner , ...

    doi:10.1051/0

  65. [65]

    Radick, Richard and Pevtsov, Alexei , doi =

  66. [66]

    and Bruner, Marilyn E

    Hara, Hirohisa and Tsuneta, Saku and Acton, Loren W. and Bruner, Marilyn E. and Lemen, James R. and Ogawara, Yoshiaki , journal =. Temperatures of Coronal Holes Observed with the Yohkoh SXT , year =. doi:10.1093/pasj/46.5.493 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/46.5.493

  67. [67]

    Flat Activity

    Judge, Philip G. and Saar, Steven H. and Carlsson, Mats and Ayres, Thomas R. , journal =. A Comparison of the Outer Atmosphere of the “Flat Activity” Star τ Ceti (G8 V) with the Sun (G2 V) and α Centauri A (G2 V) , year =. doi:10.1086/421044 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1086/421044

  68. [68]

    Joseph, W. M. and Stelzer, B. and Orlando, S. and Klawin, M. , journal =. The Sun as an X-ray star: V. A new method to retrieve coronal filling factors , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557814 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557814

  69. [69]

    eROSITA all-sky survey - stars and optical loading , year =

    Robrade, J and Dennerl, K and Freyberg, M J and Schmitt, J H M M , journal =. eROSITA all-sky survey - stars and optical loading , year =

  70. [70]

    and De Angeli, F

    Riello, M. and De Angeli, F. and Evans, D. W. and Montegriffo, P. and Carrasco, J. M. and Busso, G. and Palaversa, L. and Burgess, P. W. and Diener, C. and Davidson, M. and Rowell, N. and Fabricius, C. and Jordi, C. and Bellazzini, M. and Pancino, E. and Harrison, D. L. and Cacciari, C. and van Leeuwen, F. and Hambly, N. C. and Hodgkin, S. T. and Osborne,...

  71. [71]

    Johnstone, C. P. and Güdel, M. , journal =. The coronal temperatures of low-mass main-sequence stars , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425283 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425283

  72. [72]

    Provencal, J. L. and Shipman, H. L. and Koester, Detlev and Wesemael, F. and Bergeron, P. , journal =. Procyon B: Outside the Iron Box , year =. doi:10.1086/338769 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/338769

  73. [73]

    and Czesla, S

    Freund, S. and Czesla, S. and Robrade, J. and Schneider, P. C. and Schmitt, J. H. M. M. , journal =. The stellar content of the ROSAT all-sky survey , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142573 , publisher =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142573

  74. [74]

    1992 , month = mar, pages =

    Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , title =. 1992 , month = mar, pages =

    1992

  75. [75]

    Feigelson, E. D. and Nelson, P. I. , journal =. Statistical methods for astronomical data with upper limits. I - Univariate distributions , year =. doi:10.1086/163225 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/163225

  76. [76]

    and Feigelson, E

    Isobe, T. and Feigelson, E. D. and Nelson, P. I. , journal =. Statistical methods for astronomical data with upper limits. II - Correlation and regression , year =. doi:10.1086/164359 , publisher =

    doi:10.1086/164359

  77. [77]

    and Neuhäuser, R

    Stelzer, B. and Neuhäuser, R. , journal =. X-ray emission from young stars in Taurus-Auriga-Perseus: Luminosity functions and the rotation -activity -age -relation , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011093 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011093

  78. [78]

    Khamitov, I. M. and Bikmaev, I. F. and Gilfanov, M. R. and Sunyaev, R. A. and Medvedev, P. S. , journal =. 850 SRG/eROSITA Sources in the Pleiades , year =. doi:10.1134/s1063773725700094 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773725700094

  79. [79]

    Joseph, W. M. and Stelzer, B. and Magaudda, E. and Vičánek Martínez, T. , journal =. Simultaneous X-ray and optical variability of M dwarfs observed with eROSITA and TESS , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449405 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449405

  80. [80]

    Characterisation of all known multiple stellar systems within 10 pc , year =

    González-Payo, J and Caballero, J A and Cifuentes, C and Cortés-Contreras, M and Rica, F , journal =. Characterisation of all known multiple stellar systems within 10 pc , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag838 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag838

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.