Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Nonlinear stability and instability of rotating Riesz star solutions of the compressible Euler-Riesz equations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that rotating Riesz star solutions of the compressible Euler–Riesz equations exist as energy minimizers, are nonlinearly stable below a critical mass, and become unstable above it.

desk verdict Genuine variational progress on rotating Riesz stars, but the stability and instability theorems are conditional on global solutions whose existence for rotating data is not established. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27925 v1 pith:KLGRIXEN submitted 2026-07-30 math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MP

Samuel R. Charles This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.FAmath.MP MSC 35Q3535Q3135B3535A1535R0935L6576N1035B38
keywords compressibleEuler-RieszequationsrotatingRieszstarsnonlinearstabilityinstabilityconcentrationcompactnessmass-supercriticalregimepotentialaxisymmetricsteadystates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a conditional dichotomy for rotating Riesz stars, axisymmetric steady states of the attractive compressible Euler–Riesz equations that rotate with angular velocity J(m(r))/r. In the mass-subcritical regime the stars exist as minimizers of a free-energy functional and are nonlinearly stable, provided global finite-energy weak solutions retain the assumed angular-momentum structure along particle paths. In the mass-supercritical polytropic regime the stars still exist as minimizers but are nonlinearly unstable: arbitrarily close initial data lead to solutions whose support grows without bound. The dividing line is the mass-critical exponent, and the proof hinges on new compactness for axisymmetric minimizing sequences, ruling out mass escaping along rings of diverging radius.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the pair of free-energy functionals G (subcritical) and S_μ (supercritical) defined over axisymmetric densities with angular momentum squared L, together with the mass-preserving scaling ϱ_λ(x) = λ^{3/2} ϱ(λ^{1/2} x) and the quantity κ(ϱ) that separates the two possible critical scalings when α ∈ (0,2). These tools convert compactness of minimizers into existence of stars, and concavity of S_μ under scaling into growth of support, giving instability.

What would settle it

Take α = 1, polytropic exponent γ = 6/5 (supercritical), and L(m) = m^ω with ω chosen slightly below the predicted threshold ω* + ω̄. If numerical solutions starting in the invariant set fail to grow support, the instability condition is falsified; more directly, constructing a global weak solution for rotating axisymmetric data that violates (A2) would falsify the stability theorem's premise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For subcritical masses, rotating Riesz stars are variational minimizers and nonlinearly stable; for supercritical masses, they exist as minimizers but are unstable through growth of support. The steady state satisfies the profile equation (ρ e(ρ))_ρ + ∫_r^∞ L(m_ρ(s))s^{-3} ds + Φα * ρ = -μ on its support, with rotational velocity J(m_ρ(r))/r e_θ. The central compactness theorem shows that an axisymmetric minimizing sequence cannot lose mass along rings whose radii diverge, because the potential energy would then vanish and force the infimum to become non-negative, contradicting strict negativity. The instability proof uses concavity of the rescaled free energy and a virial identity to force

Load-bearing premise

The theorems assume that global finite-energy weak or classical solutions of the Euler–Riesz equations exist and conserve angular momentum and mass along particle paths; the paper does not prove global existence for rotating axisymmetric data, and known finite-time singularity results make this premise fragile.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the stability theorem holds, then for polytropic gases with γ > (3+α)/3, solutions starting close to a rotating Riesz star remain close in the relative-energy distance for all time, up to vertical translation.
  • In the supercritical range, any solution starting in the invariant set I_μ must have support growing to infinity, so the star is not even nonlinearly stable in a weak sense.
  • The stability result requires conservation of angular momentum and mass along particle paths; if these structural assumptions fail, the dichotomy may collapse.
  • The mass bounds (2.5)–(2.6) play the role of a critical mass; crossing it flips stability to instability for rotating Riesz stars.
  • The results generalize the classical rotating-star theory of the Euler–Poisson equations to the full Riesz range α ∈ (0,3).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The virial-based instability argument likely transfers to finite-energy weak solutions provided the structural assumptions (A1)–(A4) hold, since it only uses the weak form of the equations.
  • The superhomogeneity threshold ω* + ω̄ may be sharp; testing with power-law angular momentum L(m) = m^ω near the threshold would provide a concrete numerical check of the existence and instability conditions.
  • The ring-drifting compactness result is a general template for axisymmetric variational problems with rotational terms: if minimizing mass drifts to infinite radius, potential energy vanishes and forces the energy to be non-negative.
  • Rotation appears to stabilize in the regime α ∈ (0,2) by slowing ring drift, but destabilizes for α ∈ [2,3) in the supercritical regime, indicating that the effect of rotation depends on the singularity of the Riesz kernel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies rotating steady states of the attractive three-dimensional compressible Euler–Riesz equations (CEREs), which it calls rotating Riesz stars. In the mass-subcritical regime (general pressure laws, polytropically γ > (3+α)/3), it proves existence of minimisers of the free-energy functional G over axisymmetric densities of fixed mass under subhomogeneity conditions on the angular momentum profile L, and shows these minimisers solve the rotating-star equations (2.4) (Corollary 3.10, Theorem 3.11). It then proves a conditional nonlinear stability theorem (Theorem 2.5) for a unique minimiser, assuming the existence of global finite-energy weak solutions satisfying structural assumptions (A1)–(A4). In the polytropic mass-supercritical regime (6/(6−α) < γ < (3+α)/3), it introduces a modified admissible class K and proves existence of minimisers of S_μ (Theorem 2.8) under superhomogeneity conditions, and shows these are compactly supported rotating Riesz stars. Finally, under an additional growth condition on L and assuming global classical solutions, it proves growth of the support for solutions starting near the star (Theorem 6.4), yielding a conditional instability result. The main technical novelty is a concentration-compactness argument adapted to axisymmetry that excludes loss of mass along rings with diverging radii.

Significance. Provided the conditional premises are accepted, the paper makes a significant contribution: it extends the classical Auchmuty–Beals/Luo–Smoller rotating-star theory from Newtonian to Riesz interactions, introduces a genuinely new compactness mechanism for axisymmetric sequences (control of ring concentration), and gives the first mass-supercritical existence result beyond small angular velocity. The variational Euler–Lagrange computations are coherent and the scaling analysis is internally consistent. However, the dynamical conclusions are conditional on global existence and uniqueness hypotheses that are not proved here; the cited global existence result is for spherically symmetric data, and known singularity results for classical solutions make the instability theorem's premise potentially empty. The paper's strengths include a detailed variational framework and explicit scaling analysis; its main weakness is the gap between the stated 'nonlinear stability/instability' and the conditional nature of the theorems.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorems 2.5 and 6.4] The central dynamical theorems are conditional on global solutions that are not shown to exist. Theorem 2.5 assumes a global finite-energy weak solution satisfying (A1)–(A4); Theorem 6.4 assumes a global classical solution. The cited global existence result [13] is restricted to spherically symmetric initial data, and Choi–Jeong [21] prove finite-time singularity for classical solutions in the attractive regime. Consequently, the paper does not establish that rotating Riesz stars are actually stable or unstable solutions of the CEREs; it proves conditional statements about hypothetical global solutions. Since the abstract and introduction present nonlinear stability/instability as the main results, this missing existence premise is load-bearing. The author should either prove global existence for rotating axisymmetric data (or at least provide a local existence/continuation framework), o
  2. [Theorem 2.5] The stability theorem assumes ¯ρ is the unique minimiser of G over X_M up to vertical translation, but Corollary 3.10 only establishes existence of a minimiser. No uniqueness proof or example is provided. Without uniqueness, Theorem 3.2 only gives convergence of a minimising sequence to some minimiser; the contradiction argument in §4 cannot identify the limit with the reference state ¯ρ. Remark 4.2 refers to the non-unique case but gives no proof. The theorem should either prove uniqueness under (2.5)–(2.7), or be reformulated as stability of the set of minimisers, or the uniqueness hypothesis should be stated prominently in the abstract.
  3. [Theorem 3.2, Step 4] The exclusion of concentration along rings with diverging radii is the key new compactness statement, but the proof is sketched. In particular, estimate (3.17) is asserted without proof, and the covering argument with Cov_k(R) is terse. Since this is the central new ingredient separating the paper from prior non-rotating compactness arguments, the author should provide a complete proof of (3.17), including the precise use of axisymmetry, and justify the covering estimate in detail.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Definition 2.1(b)] The two displayed inequalities are not clearly labelled; the first involves a different sign of the potential term and is later used as an energy upper bound. Please clarify which quantity is the physical energy and which is an auxiliary bound.
  2. [Lemma 3.8] The uniform convergence of m^S_{ϱ_k}(r) on [0,R] is justified by a 'variation of Dini's Theorem' from [61, p.167]; monotonicity in k is not shown, so please spell out the argument or replace it with a direct proof.
  3. [Appendix A] The phrase 'main text of the thesis' should be 'main text of the paper'.
  4. [Equation (2.8)] The relative energy is defined with a subtracted rotational kinetic term; please explain the physical meaning of this subtraction in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: rotating-star construction is a genuine minimizer-to-Euler-Lagrange argument, and stability/instability are conditional theorems proved from stated assumptions.

full rationale

No load-bearing step reduces to its own input or to a self-citation. The rotating Riesz star (Def. 2.2) is defined by the steady-state equation (2.4) obtained by inserting the angular-momentum ansatz into (1.1); Theorem 3.11 then derives exactly this equation as the Euler-Lagrange equation of the free energy G, whose rotational term is the kinetic energy of the same ansatz. This is a standard variational characterization, not a fitted prediction: L is prescribed, and the theorem produces a density satisfying the corresponding equation. The stability theorem (Thm. 2.5) is an implication whose premises (global finite-energy weak solutions satisfying (A1)-(A4), unique minimizer up to vertical translation) are stated assumptions, not conclusions obtained by citing [12] or [13]; the concentration-compactness proof in Section 4 is carried out in the paper. The mass-supercritical existence (Thm. 2.8) and instability (Thm. 6.4) are proved from the stated superhomogeneity conditions, with the threshold ω*+ω̄ derived in §5 and shown necessary in Remark 5.11; no 'prediction' is statistically forced or definitionally identical to an input. The author's self-citations [12],[13] provide background on non-rotating/spherically symmetric global existence and the stationary variational framework, but the rotating results are new and are not reduced to those papers. The absence of a proof of global existence for rotating axisymmetric data is a correctness/existence gap (the theorems are conditional), not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard convolution inequalities, on explicit assumptions about the angular momentum profile L and the pressure law, and on two substantial unproven premises: global weak/classical solutions with the required angular-momentum structure, and uniqueness of the subcritical minimizer. These are the load-bearing inputs the reader must accept.

free parameters (1)
  • Angular momentum profile L
    All theorems are conditional on an input function L satisfying monotonicity and (sub/super)homogeneity conditions: (2.3),(2.7),(2.11) in the subcritical case; (2.13),(2.16),(2.17) in the supercritical case. It is not fitted to data, but it is chosen by hand and the results depend on it.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev and weak Young convolution inequalities with sharp constants (Lemmas A.1–A.3)
    Used throughout §3–§5 to bound potential energy and to establish the mass conditions (2.5)–(2.6).
  • standard math Riesz rearrangement inequality (Lemma A.4)
    Used in Lemma 5.8 to replace minimizer sequences by sequences that are radially decreasing in the z-coordinate.
  • domain assumption Existence of global finite-energy weak solutions of the CEREs satisfying angular-momentum conservation (A1)–(A4) for rotating axisymmetric data
    Assumed in Theorem 2.5. Not proven here; the paper cites [13], which treats spherically symmetric data, not rotating axisymmetric data.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniqueness of the minimiser of G over X_M up to vertical translations
    Required in Theorem 2.5; only existence of a minimizer is proven (Corollary 3.10). Remark 4.2 gestures at a relaxation but does not provide the proof.
  • domain assumption Global classical solutions of the polytropic CEREs exist for initial data in I_μ
    Theorem 6.4 assumes classical solutions on [0,∞). No global existence theorem is provided, and finite-time singularity formation is known for related Euler–Riesz regimes (Choi–Jeong [21]).
  • domain assumption Pressure-law and mass constraints (2.5)–(2.6)
    Ensure the free energy is bounded below and the infimum is negative; these are the Chandrasekhar-mass-type conditions used in the subcritical variational problem.
  • ad hoc to paper Superhomogeneity condition (2.16) with ω > ω* + ω̄ for α∈(0,2)
    Needed to keep the admissible set K nonempty and to prove that minimizers are rotating Riesz star solutions. Remark 5.11 argues the condition is intrinsic rather than a technical artefact.
invented entities (2)
  • Rotating Riesz star independent evidence
    purpose: A new class of axisymmetric rotating steady states of the attractive compressible Euler–Riesz equations, defined by (2.4) with velocity J(m_ρ(r))/r e_θ.
    Existence is proven by variational minimization (Theorems 3.11 and 2.8) and the object satisfies the Euler–Lagrange equations; it is an introduced solution concept, not an unexplained entity pulled from a hat.
  • Quantity κ(ϱ) independent evidence
    purpose: Separates the two possible critical scalings of a density in the α∈(0,2) supercritical regime; used to define the effective admissible set and the instability set I_μ.
    Has the explicit formula (5.1) and is derived from the second derivative of the rescaled free energy; it is a mathematical construction with a falsifiable role in the proof, not a physical entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear stability and instability of rotating Riesz star solutions of the compressible Euler-Riesz equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KLGRIXEN

@misc{pith2026260727925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear stability and instability of rotating Riesz star solutions of the compressible Euler-Riesz equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KLGRIXEN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27925}
}
read the original abstract

The compressible Euler--Riesz equations arise in the modelling of a wide range of physical phenomena, including stellar dynamics, plasma physics, and mathematical biology. We study rotating steady states of the attractive compressible Euler--Riesz equations, which we call rotating Riesz stars, and establish existence and nonlinear stability or instability results in both the mass-subcritical and mass-supercritical regimes. In the mass-subcritical regime, we prove the existence of rotating Riesz stars under suitable subhomogeneity assumptions on the angular momentum profile. We then establish their nonlinear stability through a concentration compactness argument adapted to the axisymmetric setting. Rotation creates new compactness difficulties, most notably the possibility that minimising sequences are tight along rings whose radii diverge to infinity. In the mass-supercritical regime, we prove existence in the polytropic setting under suitable superhomogeneity assumptions on the angular momentum profile, thereby extending the theory beyond the small angular velocity regime. The proof requires a careful analysis of mass-preserving scalings, which are more delicate than in the non-rotating case. Finally, by analysing the concavity of the free-energy along these scalings, we establish the instability of the resulting mass-supercritical rotating Riesz stars. Our results show that rotation can have either a stabilising or a destabilising effect, depending on the singularity of the Riesz interaction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references

  1. [13]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. R. Charles, G.-Q. G. Chen, and D. Yuan. Global existence and nonlinear stability of finite-energy solutions of the compressible Euler-Riesz equations with large initial data of spherical symmetry, 2025

    2025

  2. [21]

    Choi and I.-J

    Y.-P. Choi and I.-J. Jeong. On well-posedness and singularity formation for the Euler–Riesz system.Journal of Differential Equations, 306:296–332, Jan. 2022. REFERENCES 51

    2022

  3. [1]

    Auchmuty

    G. Auchmuty. The global branching of rotating stars.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 114(2):179–193, 1991

    1991

  4. [2]

    J. F. G. Auchmuty and R. Beals. Variational solutions of some nonlinear free boundary problems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 43(4):255–271, Jan. 1971

    1971

  5. [3]

    A. L. Bertozzi and T. Laurent. Finite-time blow-up of solutions of an aggregation equation inR n.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 274(3):717–735, 2007

    2007

  6. [4]

    A. L. Bertozzi, T. Laurent, and F. L´ eger. Aggregation and spreading via the Newtonian potential: the dynamics of patch solutions.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 22(suppl. 1):1140005, 2012

    2012

  7. [5]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine.Galactic Dynamics. Princeton University Press, 2nd edition, 2008

    2008

  8. [6]

    Blanchet, J

    A. Blanchet, J. Dolbeault, and B. Perthame. Two-dimensional Keller–Segel model: optimal critical mass and qualitative properties of the solutions.Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2006(44):1–33, 2006

    2006

Show all 68 references
  1. [7]

    A. V. Bobylev, P. Dukes, R. Illner, and H. D. Victory. On Vlasov–Manev equations. i: foundations, properties, and nonglobal existence.Journal of Statistical Physics, 88(3–4):885– 911, Aug. 1997

    1997

  2. [8]

    L. A. Caffarelli and A. Friedman. The shape of axisymmetric rotating fluid.Journal of Functional Analysis, 35(1):109–142, Jan. 1980

    1980

  3. [9]

    Calvez, J

    V. Calvez, J. Carrillo, and F. Hoffmann. Equilibria of homogeneous functionals in the fair- competition regime.Nonlinear Analysis, 159:85–128, Aug. 2017

    2017

  4. [10]

    Campa, T

    A. Campa, T. Dauxois, D. Fanelli, and S. Ruffo.Physics of Long-Range Interacting Systems. Oxford University Press Oxford, Aug. 2014

    2014

  5. [11]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. Hittmeir, B. Volzone, and Y. Yao. Nonlinear aggregation-diffusion equa- tions: radial symmetry and long time asymptotics.Inventiones mathematicae, 218(3):889– 977, July 2019

    2019

  6. [12]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. R. Charles, G.-Q. G. Chen, and D. Yuan. Nonlinear stability and instability of finite-energy solutions of the compressible Euler-Riesz equations with general pressure laws, 2026

    2026

  7. [14]

    J. A. Carrillo and Y.-P. Choi. Mean-field limits: from particle descriptions to macroscopic equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 241(3):1529–1573, June 2021

    2021

  8. [15]

    J. A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi, and S. P. Perez. A review on attractive–repulsive hydrodynamics for consensus in collective behavior. InActive Particles, Volume 1, pages 259–298. Springer International Publishing, 2017

    2017

  9. [16]

    J. A. Carrillo, K. Craig, and Y. Yao.Aggregation-diffusion equations: dynamics, asymptotics, and singular limits. InActive Particles, Volume 2. Springer International Publishing, 2019, pages 65–108

    2019

  10. [17]

    Cercignani, R

    C. Cercignani, R. Illner, and M. Pulvirenti.The mathematical theory of dilute gases, vol- ume 106 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994, pages viii+347

    1994

  11. [18]

    Chandrasekhar.An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structures

    S. Chandrasekhar.An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structures. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1938

    1938

  12. [19]

    Chanillo and Y

    S. Chanillo and Y. Y. Li. On diameters of uniformly rotating stars.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 166(2):417–430, Dec. 1994

    1994

  13. [20]

    Cheng, X

    M. Cheng, X. Cheng, and Z. Lin. Expanding solutions near unstable Lane-Emden stars. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(7), June 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Choi and J

    Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung. The pressureless damped Euler–Riesz equations.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire, 40(3):593–630, Aug. 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Y.-P. Choi, J. Jung, and Y. Lee. The global Cauchy problem for the Euler–Riesz equations. Nonlinear Analysis, 253:113724, Apr. 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Cotar and M

    C. Cotar and M. Petrache. Next-order asymptotic expansion for n-marginal optimal trans- port with Coulomb and Riesz costs.Advances in Mathematics, 344:137–233, Feb. 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Danchin and B

    R. Danchin and B. Ducomet. On the global existence for the compressible Euler–Riesz system.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 24(2), Mar. 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Deng, T.-P

    Y. Deng, T.-P. Liu, T. Yang, and Z.-a. Yao. Solutions of Euler-Poisson equations for gaseous stars.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 164(3):261–285, Sept. 2002

    2002

  19. [27]

    Elgart and B

    A. Elgart and B. Schlein. Mean field dynamics of boson stars.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 60(4):500–545, 2007

    2007

  20. [28]

    L. C. Evans.Weak convergence methods for nonlinear partial differential equations. eng. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Number 74. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1990

    1990

  21. [29]

    Friedman and B

    A. Friedman and B. Turkington. Asymptotic estimates for an axisymmetric rotating fluid. Journal of Functional Analysis, 37(2):136–163, June 1980

    1980

  22. [30]

    Friedman and B

    A. Friedman and B. Turkington. Existence and dimensions of a rotating white dwarf.Journal of Differential Equations, 42(3):414–437, Dec. 1981

    1981

  23. [31]

    Fr¨ ohlich, B

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, B. L. G. Jonsson, and E. Lenzmann. Boson stars as solitary waves.Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics, 274:1–30, 2007

    2007

  24. [32]

    I. M. Gel’fand and G. E. Shilov.Generalized functions. Vol. 1. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, 2016, pages xviii+423. Properties and operations, Translated from the 1958 Russian original [MR0097715] by Eugene Saletan, Reprint of the 1964 English translation [MR0166596]

    2016

  25. [33]

    D. P. Hardin, T. Lebl´ e, E. B. Saff, and S. Serfaty. Large deviation principles for hypersingular Riesz gases.Constructive Approximation, 48(1):61–100, May 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    U. Heilig. On Lichtenstein’s analysis of rotating Newtonian stars.Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique, 60(4):457–487, 1994

    1994

  27. [35]

    Illner.Stellar dynamics and plasma physics with corrected potentials: Vlasov, Manev, Boltzmann, Smoluchowski

    R. Illner.Stellar dynamics and plasma physics with corrected potentials: Vlasov, Manev, Boltzmann, Smoluchowski. InHydrodynamic limits and related topics (Toronto, ON, 1998). Volume 27. Fields Inst. Commun. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000, pages 95–108

    1998

  28. [36]

    J. Jang. Nonlinear instability in gravitational Euler–Poisson systems forγ= 6 5 .Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 188(2):265–307, Feb. 2008

    2008

  29. [37]

    J. Jang. Nonlinear instability theory of Lane-Emden stars.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 67(9):14 18–1465, Dec. 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    Jang and T

    J. Jang and T. Makino. On rotating axisymmetric solutions of the Euler–Poisson equations. Journal of Differential Equations, 266(7):3942–3972, Mar. 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Jang and T

    J. Jang and T. Makino. On slowly rotating axisymmetric solutions of the Euler–Poisson equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 225(2):873–900, Apr. 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    J. Jang, W. A. Strauss, and Y. Wu. Existence of rotating stars with variable entropy.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55(4):2704–2739, July 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 26(3):399–415, 1970

    1970

  34. [42]

    M. Lewin. Coulomb and Riesz gases: the known and the unknown.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 63(6), June 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Lewin, E

    M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb, and R. Seiringer. Statistical mechanics of the uniform electron gas. Journal de l’ ´Ecole polytechnique — Math´ ematiques, 5:79–116, Nov. 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    Y. Li. On uniformly rotating stars.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 115(4):367– 393, 1991. 52 REFERENCES

    1991

  37. [45]

    Lichtenstein

    L. Lichtenstein. Untersuchungen ¨ uber die gleichgewichtsfiguren rotierender fl¨ ussigkeiten, deren teilchen einander nach dem newtonschen gesetze anziehen.Mathematische Zeitschrift, 1933

    1933

  38. [46]

    E. H. Lieb and M. Loss.Analysis, volume 14 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 2001, pages xxii+346

    2001

  39. [47]

    E. H. Lieb and H.-T. Yau. The chandrasekhar theory of stellar collapse as the limit of quantum mechanics.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 112:147–174, 1987

    1987

  40. [48]

    Lin and Y

    Z. Lin and Y. Wang. Stability of rotating gaseous stars.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 402(2):1725–1763, June 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Z. Lin, Y. Wang, and H. Zhu. Nonlinear stability of non-rotating gaseous stars.Mathema- tische Annalen, 391(1):843–880, July 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Lin and C

    Z. Lin and C. Zeng. Separable Hamiltonian PDEs and turning point principle for stability of gaseous stars.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 75(11):2511–2572, Nov. 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    P. Lions. Minimization problems inL 1(R3).Journal of Functional Analysis, 41(2):236–275, Apr. 1981

    1981

  44. [52]

    P. Lions. The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. the locally compact case, part 1.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire, 1(2):109– 145, Apr. 1984

    1984

  45. [53]

    T. Luo. Some results on Newtonian gaseous stars—existence and stability.Acta Mathemat- icae Applicatae Sinica, English Series, 35(1):230–254, Jan. 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    Luo and J

    T. Luo and J. Smoller. Existence and non-linear stability of rotating star solutions of the com- pressible Euler–Poisson equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 191(3):447– 496, Feb. 2008

    2008

  47. [55]

    Luo and J

    T. Luo and J. Smoller. Nonlinear dynamical stability of Newtonian rotating and non-rotating white dwarfs and rotating supermassive stars.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 284(2):425–457, July 2008

    2008

  48. [56]

    Luo and J

    T. Luo and J. Smoller. Rotating fluids with self-gravitation in bounded domains.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 173(3):345–377, May 2004

    2004

  49. [57]

    R. McCann. Stable rotating binary stars and fluid in a tube.Houston Journal of Mathemat- ics, 32(2):603–631, 2006

    2006

  50. [58]

    Nguyen, M

    Q.-H. Nguyen, M. Rosenzweig, and S. Serfaty. Mean-field limits of Riesz-type singular flows. Ars Inven. Anal., 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    G. Rein. Collisionless kinetic equations from astrophysics: the vlasov–poisson system. In Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations. Volume 3, pages 383–476. El- sevier, 2007

    2007

  52. [60]

    G. Rein. Non-linear stability of gaseous stars.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 168(2):115–130, June 2003

    2003

  53. [61]

    Rudin.Principles of mathematical analysis

    W. Rudin.Principles of mathematical analysis. McGraw-Hill, United States, 3rd edition,

  54. [62]

    S. Serfaty. Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    S. Serfaty. Mean field limit for Coulomb-type flows.Duke Mathematical Journal, 169(15), Oct. 2020

    2020

  56. [64]

    W. A. Strauss and Y. Wu. Rapidly rotating stars.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 368(2):701–721, Apr. 2019

    2019

  57. [65]

    W. A. Strauss and Y. Wu. Steady states of rotating stars and galaxies.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 49(6):4865–4914, Jan. 2017

    2017

  58. [66]

    J. L. Tassoul.Theory of rotating stars. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978

    1978

  59. [67]

    Y. Wu. Existence of rotating planet solutions to the Euler–Poisson equations with an inner hard core.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 219(1):1–26, May 2015. REFERENCES 53

    2015

  60. [68]

    Y. Wu. On rotating star solutions to the non-isentropic Euler–Poisson equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 259(12):7161–7198, Dec. 2015. S.R. Charles: Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076, Singapore Email address:samuel.charles@...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.