Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 86 references

Tunable Conformal Graphene Growth on Oxide Nanotube scaffolds: Towards Superwettable Hierarchical 2D-3D Architectures

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A plasma-based route grows vertical graphene nanowalls conformally around oxide nanotubes, yielding durable, fluorine-free omniphobic surfaces.

desk verdict A genuinely new plasma route for graphene-nanowall-coated oxide nanotubes, but the wetting claim that GNWs dominate is contradicted by the paper's own controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27980 v2 pith:4367WX5X submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords graphenenanowallsPECVDnanotubescaffoldssuperomniphobicityCassie-Baxterstatefluorine-freewettingstabilityhierarchicalnanostructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a dry, low-temperature plasma route that coats oxide nanotube scaffolds (titania, silica, alumina) with radially oriented graphene nanowalls, forming a hierarchical 2D-on-3D architecture. The authors argue that the resulting multiscale, re-entrant roughness traps air so effectively that the surfaces repel water, blood serum, and other complex fluids at contact angles above 170 degrees, without any fluorinated chemistry. They further claim that the graphene coating dominates the wetting response, decoupling it from the underlying oxide, and that the repellency survives UV exposure and condensation. If true, this would provide a scalable, fluorine-free path to durable omniphobic coatings and to conductive, high-surface-area scaffolds for sensing and energy applications.

What carries the argument

Graphene nanowalls (GNWs): few-layer, vertically oriented graphene sheets grown by radio-frequency plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. They nucleate perpendicular to the local oxide surface—radially on nanotube sidewalls and upward on nanotube tips—creating a re-entrant, multiscale roughness that stabilizes trapped air and suppresses the Cassie–Baxter to Wenzel transition. The sacrificial organic nanowire template is removed during the high-temperature graphene growth, leaving hollow oxide nanotubes.

What would settle it

Take a TiO2 nanotube forest, grow graphene nanowalls under the stated conditions, then section the sample and image the bottom half of the tubes with TEM; if the bottom half has bare oxide or sparse nanowalls while the top is coated, and if local condensation at the base shows Wenzel impregnation, the claim that graphene domains dominate and decouple wetting fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that vertically oriented graphene nanowalls can be grown radially and conformally onto metal-oxide nanotube forests, with the oxide nanotubes themselves formed by plasma deposition on soft organic nanowire templates. The resulting surface enters a stable Cassie–Baxter state, where droplets rest on trapped air pockets, producing contact angles above 170 degrees for water and biological fluids. The authors show that the graphene coating resists UV-driven wetting transitions even when the oxide substrate (TiO2) becomes photocatalytic anatase, and environmental SEM images show condensed droplets sitting on the nanotube tips without impregnating the texture. They conclude

Load-bearing premise

The route is claimed to work uniformly along the full length of the nanotubes for all three oxides, but the paper's own TEM shows that on TiO2 the graphene grows preferentially at the tube tops because of self-shadowing; if coverage is incomplete on some oxides, the wetting behavior is not fully decoupled from the oxide and the route is not universal as claimed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fluorine-free omniphobic surfaces can be made by plasma processing alone, avoiding PFAS chemistry.
  • The wetting outcome is largely independent of the oxide, so the same graphene recipe can be ported to other oxide scaffolds.
  • The 2D-on-3D architecture combines electrical conductivity with high surface area, making it promising for supercapacitors, sensors, and electrocatalysis.
  • UV and condensation stability implies the repellency can persist in humid or outdoor conditions where TiO2-based superhydrophobic surfaces typically fail.
  • Mild growth conditions (around 450–600 °C, low RF power) make the process compatible with a range of thermally fragile substrates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If conformal coverage is the true mechanism, then deliberately shadowed nanotube arrays (tilted or longer tubes) should show degraded omniphobicity; local wetting measurements at tube bottoms would directly test this.
  • The claim that GNWs decouple wetting from oxide chemistry could be extended to other oxides such as ZnO or SnO2 using the same two-step plasma route; success there would strengthen the universality argument.
  • The ESEM observations of delayed nucleation and droplet coalescence hint at tunable water-harvesting or fog-collection behavior, which could be engineered by adjusting nanotube density and spacing.
  • Because the paper shows oxygen functionality varying with oxide support, one could test whether edge chemistry changes catalytic or sensing performance, linking the wetting results to electrochemical behavior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a multi-step vacuum/plasma method to grow vertical graphene nanowalls (GNWs) conformally on TiO₂, Al₂O₃, and SiO₂ nanotube scaffolds derived from organic nanowire templates. The hierarchical surfaces are characterized by SEM/TEM/EDX/XPS/NEXAFS/Raman, and wetting measurements indicate superhydrophobic/omniphobic behavior with WCA >175° for water and complex fluids, with repellency maintained under UV irradiation and ESEM condensation. The central claim is that GNWs dominate the wetting response, decoupling surface behavior from the intrinsic oxide chemistry, and that the route is universal and substrate-compatible.

Significance. If the central attribution were supported, the work would provide a low-temperature, fluorine-free plasma route to hierarchical graphene-oxide surfaces, which is of genuine interest for wetting, anti-fouling, and energy applications. The strengths include the broad structural and chemical characterization (SEM, TEM, EDX, XPS, NEXAFS, Raman), direct wetting and ESEM condensation measurements, and a control data table that allows the reader to assess the incremental effect of the GNW coating. However, the paper's own controls undermine the headline mechanistic claim, so the significance as currently stated is not established; the underlying fabrication results may still be valuable after a substantial revision of the interpretation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3 / Table S2] The central claim that 'GNWs dominate the wetting response across TiO₂, Al₂O₃, and SiO₂ nanotube scaffolds' is directly contradicted by the paper's own control data. Table S2 shows that bare TiO₂ NTs and Al₂O₃ NTs already exhibit WCA >175°, CAH <10°, and roll-off angles of 5° and <5°, respectively, i.e., the same superhydrophobic state as the GNW-coated samples. Only SiO₂ NTs change from superhydrophilic (<10°) to superhydrophobic after GNW coating. Moreover, GNWs on flat Si give only WCA 135° with strong pinning (CAH 20°, no sliding), so the GNW layer alone is insufficient to produce the reported superomniphobicity. The conclusion in §4 that 'graphene nanostructures dominate the wetting response, largely decoupling surface behavior from the intrinsic oxide shell chemistry' is therefore not supported by the presented before/after data. This is a load-bearing attribution issue that must b
  2. [§3.2 / Figure 2c] The 'universal, substrate-compatible, conformal coverage' claim is weakened by acknowledged incomplete coverage on TiO₂. The text in §3.2 states that self-shadowing produces 'higher thickness at the top' and that for TiO₂ 'nanowall growth is preferentially observed at the top of the nanotube' (Figure 2c). Table S1 also reports residual Ti (3.6 at%) and Al (1.5 at%) after GNW coating, indicating incomplete shielding of the oxide surface. If coverage is incomplete, the wetting response is not fully decoupled from the oxide chemistry, and the route is not universal in the sense claimed. The authors should either provide evidence of full-length coverage for all three oxides or explicitly qualify the conformality claim to reflect the TiO₂ data.
  3. [§3.3] The Cassie–Baxter analysis uses fitted parameters rather than independent measurements. The effective solid fraction φ≈0.02 and intrinsic WCA≈80° are chosen to reproduce the measured WCA, so the statement that the data are 'fully consistent with a hierarchical Cassie-Baxter wetting state' is circular unless these parameters are validated independently (e.g., by direct imaging of the liquid-air interface or by measuring θ_Y on a flat GNW surface). This does not invalidate the wetting measurements themselves, but the mechanistic conclusion should be presented as a plausible interpretation, not a confirmation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / §3.3] Contact angles are reported as single values or inequalities ('>175°', '<5°') without error bars, number of measurements, or statistical significance. Given the small differences between bare and coated samples on TiO₂/Al₂O₃, the absence of uncertainty estimates makes the 'dominance' claim even harder to evaluate.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'long-term omniphobicity' is not supported by any long-term or accelerated-aging test. The reported data cover short-term UV exposure (180 min) and ESEM condensation experiments; a statement about long-term durability should be removed or substantiated with appropriate time-resolved measurements.
  3. [§4] Typo: 'Comprensive' should be 'Comprehensive' in the Conclusions.
  4. [References] Reference [74] is incomplete: 'The NIST X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) database' lacks author, year, and a URL or DOI. Also, references [58] and [1] appear to be the same work; consider consolidating.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central claims are experimental. One minor fitted Cassie-Baxter solid fraction is rationalized as a theoretical consistency check rather than an independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3, Superwettability on MeOx@GNWs structures (paragraphs on WCA rationalization and theoretical solid fraction)]
    "The measured WCA can instead be rationalized by assuming and intrinsic WCA ~80º and a realistic effective solid fraction (φ~0.22), supporting a sticky (strong adhesion) hydrophobic behavior... The theoretical solid fraction required to reproduce the measured WCA is very small (φ~0.02) being fully consistent with a hierarchical Cassie-Baxter wetting state."

    The Cassie-Baxter solid fraction φ is not measured independently; it is chosen so that the Cassie-Baxter equation reproduces the already-measured WCA. The phrase 'theoretical solid fraction required to reproduce the measured WCA' explicitly shows that the model output is forced by the data through the fitted φ. This is a rationalization of the observed wetting data, not a prediction. It is a minor issue because the paper's main claims are the experimental fabrication and measured wettability values, not the fitted Cassie-Baxter parameters.

full rationale

The paper is primarily an experimental fabrication and characterization study. The central claims—conformal GNW growth on oxide nanotube scaffolds and measured superomniphobic wetting behavior—stand on SEM/TEM/XPS/Raman data and direct contact-angle measurements, not on a derivational chain that could be circular. The only place where a model is used to 'reproduce' data is the Cassie-Baxter analysis in §3.3, where the solid fraction is adjusted to match the measured WCA and then described as 'theoretical' and 'consistent.' That is a fit, not a prediction, and it does not support the main conclusions by itself. Self-citations to prior plasma/GNW work exist but are not load-bearing in a circular way: the GNW growth is independently characterized here, and the self-cited references are about growth parameters, not about deriving the wetting result. The concern that bare TiO2 and Al2O3 nanotubes already show WCA >175°, undercutting the claim that GNWs 'dominate' the wetting response, is a correctness/attribution issue, not circularity. Overall, no substantial circularity is present; the minor fitted-Cassie-Baxter rationalization warrants a score of 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard wetting models and spectroscopic interpretations, plus a few hand-chosen process conditions. No new physical entities are postulated. The main fitted parameters are the solid fractions and intrinsic contact angle used in the Cassie-Baxter rationalization; the 600 °C growth temperature is a hand-chosen condition that conflicts with the paper's "low-temperature" summary.

free parameters (4)
  • GNW growth substrate temperature = 600 °C
    Hand-chosen PECVD condition (§2.2); load-bearing for the "mild-temperature/low-temperature" claim and for template removal, but inconsistent with the ~450 °C statement in the Conclusions.
  • Cassie-Baxter solid fraction φ (flat GNWs) = ~0.22
    Chosen in §3.3 so the Cassie-Baxter equation reproduces the measured 135° WCA of flat GNWs; no independent measurement is provided.
  • Cassie-Baxter solid fraction φ (hierarchical NTs@GNWs) = ~0.02
    Stated in §3.3 as "the theoretical solid fraction required to reproduce the measured WCA"; fitted to the measured contact angle, not predicted from geometry.
  • Intrinsic GNW water contact angle θ_Y = ~80°
    Assumed in §3.3 to rationalize the flat-GNW hydrophobic response; not measured independently.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Cassie-Baxter equation and the metastable Cassie-Baxter state govern the wetting of the hierarchical surfaces.
    Used in §3.3 to interpret WCA >175° and the UV/condensation stability; assumes no significant partial-Wenzel penetration.
  • domain assumption The organic H2Pc template is fully removed at the GNW growth temperature through oxide porosity, leaving empty nanotubes.
    Stated in §2.1; underpins the hollow nanotube scaffold architecture; the paper does not directly show complete removal.
  • domain assumption Raman I_D/I_G and XPS C1s sp2/sp3 decompositions are valid proxies for edge density and graphitic quality in vertical graphene.
    Used throughout §3.2; the authors themselves caution that the standard crystallite-size formula cannot be applied to vertical graphene, yet they rely on these ratios to support the sp2 preservation claim.
  • domain assumption The plasma sheath electric field orients flexible organic nanowires vertically during oxide shell deposition.
    Invoked in §3.1 to explain the vertical nanoforest morphology that the conformal GNW growth and re-entrant roughness depend on.
  • domain assumption Angle-resolved NEXAFS π*/σ* intensity changes uniquely indicate vertical versus horizontal graphene orientation on rough 3D scaffolds.
    Used in §3.2; assumes a clean two-orbital linear-dichroism picture despite complex 3D topography.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable Conformal Graphene Growth on Oxide Nanotube scaffolds: Towards Superwettable Hierarchical 2D-3D Architectures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4367WX5X

@misc{pith2026260727980,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable Conformal Graphene Growth on Oxide Nanotube scaffolds: Towards Superwettable Hierarchical 2D-3D Architectures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4367WX5X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27980}
}
read the original abstract

Hierarchical hybrid nanoarchitectures that integrate vertically oriented graphene nanowalls, GNWs, with metal oxide, MeOx, nanotube scaffolds offer versatile platform for smart surfaces, nanoelectronics, and electrochemical technologies. Herein we present rapid, dry, plasma-assisted fabrication route that enables direct and conformal growth of GNWs on mechanically robust MeOx nanoforests. The method combines supported single-crystalline organic nanowires as a 1D soft template with sequential plasma-enabled oxide deposition and GNW growth, all performed under mild temperature, power, and vacuum conditions. This approach yields an unprecedented 2D-3D hierarchical architecture consisting of tunable-thickness MeOx nanotubes uniformly decorated with radially oriented graphene nanosheets, forming re-entrant, multiscale surface. Resulting hierarchical roughness imparts fluorine-free, long-term omniphobicity, with contact angles exceeding 170 degree for water, bovine serum, and other complex fluids. GNWs dominate the wetting response across TiO2, Al2O3, and SiO2 nanotube scaffolds, effectively decoupling surface behavior from intrinsic oxide chemistry and maintaining robust repellency under UV irradiation and water condensation. Comprehensive SEM, TEM, XPS, angle-resolved NEXAFS, and Raman analyses elucidate growth mechanism and confirm preservation of the sp2 graphitic framework, together with controlled degree of edge functionalization. Overall, this work establishes universal, substrate-compatible, low-temperature, and scalable route for the fabrication of tunable graphene-metal oxide nano-microstructured multifunctional surfaces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27980 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Microstructure of the 3D Hierarchical MeOx@GNWs supported nanostructures. Characteristic SEM micrographs showing the formation of GNWs on supported MeOx nanotubes on Si wafers for: a) as-grown SiO2 nanotubes, b-c) SiO2 NTs@GNWs (i.e., after deposition of GNW), d) TiO2 NTs, e-f) TiO2 NTs@GNWs, g) detailed top-view of a graphene-coated single TiO2 nanotube, h) Al2O3 NTs before GNWs deposition, i-j) Al2O3 NTs@GNWs and … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. XPS chemical composition analysis of the carbon functionalities through the C1s spectra at the surface of a) Si/GNWs, b) TiO2 NTs@GNWs, c) SiO2 NTs @GNWs and d) Al2O3 NTs @GNWs, e) NEXAFS spectra for GNWs over the samples already mentioned. 3.3 Superwettability on MeOx @GNWs structures. Wettability is a key parameter for the targeted applications of these nanostructured surfaces. Table S2 summarizes the main wetting… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. a) Sequence of images of the TiO2NTs@GNWs sample demonstrating a superhydrophobic behavior through the bouncing of 5 µL water droplet that rolls off the surface. b) WCA of 2 µL evolution of different hierarchical surfaces after UV-vis light irradiation under room conditions for the indicated times with a 200W UV lamp at 30 cm of distance incident directly over 90° tilted samples. The 3D MeOx NTs@GNWs architecture pr… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a-d) Top-view ESEM micrographs showing the water condensation on the superhydrophobic TiO2 NTs @GNWs surface at -5ºC and 100% RH increasing the water vapor pressure until 475 Pa at time intervals of 20-30 seconds; h-j) Tilted cross-section ESEM micrographs evolution fo…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Contact angle measurements for different 2 µL fluid droplets (water, bovine serum, humic acid and sodium alginate) for as-grown MeOx and graphene coated NTs. Overall, these results demonstrate that the synergistic combination of graphene nanosheets and MeOx nanotube hi…
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Microstructure of the 3D Hierarchical MeO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_1.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Microstructure of the 3D Hierarchical MeO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a) HRTEM of graphene nanowalls (GNWs), b-c) TEM micrographs of SiO2NTs@GNWs and TiO2NTs@GNWs, d) compositional profile of GNWs@SiO2NTs, e-f) HAADF-STEM micrographs of SiO2NTs@GNWs and TiO2NTs@GNWs, g) compositional profile of TiO2NTs@GNWs, h-i) TEM images of single Al2…
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) Raman spectra of all graphene coated nanostructured supports: TiO2 NTs@GNWs, SiO2 NTs@GNWs and Al2O3 NTs@GNWs, and on the Si reference substrate for comparison. b) D band position in cm-1 and D shape FWHM for all VG over different substrates. c) Corresponding I2D/IG…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: XPS chemical composition analysis of the carbon functionalities through the C1s spectra at the surface of a) Si/GNWs, b) TiO2 NTs@GNWs, c) SiO2 NTs @GNWs and d) Al2O3 NTs @GNWs, e) NEXAFS spectra for GNWs over the samples already mentioned [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) Sequence of images of the TiO2NTs@GNWs sample demonstrating a superhydrophobic behavior through the bouncing of 5 µL water droplet that rolls off the surface. b) WCA of 2 µL evolution of different hierarchical surfaces after UV-vis light irradiation under room condi…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) Sequence of images of the TiO2NTs@GNWs sample demonstrating a superhydrophobic behavior through the bouncing of 5 µL water droplet that rolls off the surface. b) WCA of 2 µL evolution of different hierarchical surfaces after UV-vis light irradiation under room condi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a-d) Top-view ESEM micrographs showing the water condensation on the superhydrophobic TiO2 NTs @GNWs surface at -5ºC and 100% RH increasing the water vapor pressure until 475 Pa at time intervals of 20-30 seconds; h-j) Tilted cross-section ESEM micrographs evolution fo…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a-d) Top-view ESEM micrographs showing the water condensation on the superhydrophobic TiO2 NTs @GNWs surface at -5ºC and 100% RH increasing the water vapor pressure until 475 Pa at time intervals of 20-30 seconds; h-j) Tilted cross-section ESEM micrographs evolution fo…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Contact angle measurements for different 2 µL fluid droplets (water, bovine serum, humic acid and sodium alginate) for as-grown MeOx and graphene coated NTs. References [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references

  1. [2]

    Advancements in Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition for Producing Vertical Graphene Nanowalls,

    E. Bertran-Serra et al., “Advancements in Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition for Producing Vertical Graphene Nanowalls,” Nanomaterials, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 2533, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/nano13182533

  2. [3]

    Single-step growth of graphene and graphene-based nanostructures by plasma -enhanced chemical vapor deposition,

    N.-C. Yeh, C.-C. Hsu, J. Bagley, and W. -S. Tseng, “Single-step growth of graphene and graphene-based nanostructures by plasma -enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Nanotechnology, vol. 30, no. 16, p. 162001, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aafdbf

  3. [4]

    Synthesis of Vertically Oriented Graphene Sheets or Carbon Nanowalls—Review and Challenges,

    A. Vesel, R. Zaplotnik, G. Primc, and M. Mozetič, “Synthesis of Vertically Oriented Graphene Sheets or Carbon Nanowalls—Review and Challenges,” Materials, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 2968, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12182968

  4. [5]

    Insights into the Mechanism for Vertical Graphene Growth by Plasma - Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,

    J. Sun et al. , “Insights into the Mechanism for Vertical Graphene Growth by Plasma - Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 7152–7160, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c21640. 40

  5. [6]

    Graphene -Modified ZnO Nanostructures for Low -Temperature NO 2 Sensing,

    G. Qu et al. , “Graphene -Modified ZnO Nanostructures for Low -Temperature NO 2 Sensing,” ACS Omega , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 4221 –4232, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03624

  6. [7]

    A flexible UV nanosensor based on reduced graphene oxide decorated ZnO nanostructures,

    Z. Wang, X. Zhan, Y. Wang, S. Muhammad, Y. Huang, and J. He, “A flexible UV nanosensor based on reduced graphene oxide decorated ZnO nanostructures,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 8, p. 2678, 2012, doi: 10.1039/c2nr30354j

  7. [8]

    Review of Vertical Graphene and its Applications,

    W. Zheng, X. Zhao, and W. Fu, “Review of Vertical Graphene and its Applications,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces , vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 9561 –9579, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c19188

  8. [9]

    Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two - dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems,

    A. C. Ferrari et al. , “Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two - dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems,” Nanoscale, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 4598 –4810, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C4NR01600A

Show all 86 references
  1. [10]

    Carbon nanowalls and related materials,

    Y. Wu, B. Yang, B. Zong, H. Sun, Z. Shen, and Y. Feng, “Carbon nanowalls and related materials,” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 469, 2004, doi: 10.1039/b311682d

  2. [11]

    New Approach for High -Voltage Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors Using Vertical Graphene Nanowalls with and without Nitrogen Doping,

    Y.-W. Chi, C. -C. Hu, H. -H. Shen, and K. -P. Huang, “New Approach for High -Voltage Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors Using Vertical Graphene Nanowalls with and without Nitrogen Doping,” Nano Lett. , vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 5719 –5727, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02401

  3. [12]

    Boost of Charge Storage Performance of Graphene Nanowall Electrodes by Laser-Induced Crystallization of Metal Oxide Nanostructures,

    Y. Esqueda-Barrón et al., “Boost of Charge Storage Performance of Graphene Nanowall Electrodes by Laser-Induced Crystallization of Metal Oxide Nanostructures,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces , vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 17957 –17970, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c00951

  4. [13]

    Vertically aligned VO2 (B) nanobelt forest and its three -dimensional structure on oriented graphene for energy 41 storage,

    G. Ren, M. N. F. Hoque, X. Pan, J. Warzywoda, and Z. Fan, “Vertically aligned VO2 (B) nanobelt forest and its three -dimensional structure on oriented graphene for energy 41 storage,” J. Mater. Chem. A , vol. 3, no. 20, pp. 10787 –10794, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C5TA01900A

  5. [14]

    Vertically Aligned Sulfur –Graphene Nanowalls on Substrates for Ultrafast Lithium–Sulfur Batteries,

    B. Li, S. Li, J. Liu, B. Wang, and S. Yang, “Vertically Aligned Sulfur –Graphene Nanowalls on Substrates for Ultrafast Lithium–Sulfur Batteries,” Nano Lett., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 3073–3079, May 2015, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00064

  6. [15]

    26, 2026

    “Field emission applications of graphene -analogous two -dimensional materials: recent developments and future perspectives - Journal of Materials Chemistry C (RSC Publishing) DOI:10.1039/D1TC02054D.” Accessed: Feb. 26, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/conten...

  7. [16]

    Controlled Growth of Semiconducting Nanowire, Nanowall, and Hybrid Nanostructures on Graphene for Piezoelectric Nanogenerators,

    B. Kumar, K. Y. Lee, H. -K. Park, S. J. Chae, Y. H. Lee, and S. -W. Kim, “Controlled Growth of Semiconducting Nanowire, Nanowall, and Hybrid Nanostructures on Graphene for Piezoelectric Nanogenerators,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 4197 –4204, May 2011, doi: 10.1021/nn200942s

  8. [17]

    Toward Single -DNA Electrochemical Biosensing by Graphene Nanowalls,

    O. Akhavan, E. Ghaderi, and R. Rahighi, “Toward Single -DNA Electrochemical Biosensing by Graphene Nanowalls,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2904–2916, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1021/nn300261t

  9. [18]

    Vertical graphene nanowalls supported hybrid W2C/WOx composite material as an efficient non -noble metal electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution,

    S. Rodriguez-Miguel et al., “Vertical graphene nanowalls supported hybrid W2C/WOx composite material as an efficient non -noble metal electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e31230, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31230

  10. [19]

    A vertical graphene enhanced Zn–MnO2 flexible battery towards wearable electronic devices,

    J. Chen et al., “A vertical graphene enhanced Zn–MnO2 flexible battery towards wearable electronic devices,” J. Mater. Chem. A , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 575 –584, 2021, doi: 10.1039/D0TA08775K

  11. [20]

    Graphene Hybrid Structures for Integrated and Flexible Optoelectronics,

    X. Chen et al., “Graphene Hybrid Structures for Integrated and Flexible Optoelectronics,” Adv. Mater., vol. 32, no. 27, p. 1902039, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/adma.201902039. 42

  12. [21]

    Vacuum template synthesis of multifunctional nanotubes with tailored nanostructured walls,

    A. N. Filippin et al. , “Vacuum template synthesis of multifunctional nanotubes with tailored nanostructured walls,” Sci. Rep. , vol. 6, no. 1, p. 20637, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep20637

  13. [22]

    Plasma-Enabled Amorphous TiO2 Nanotubes as Hydrophobic Support for Molecular Sensing by SERS,

    N. Filippin et al., “Plasma-Enabled Amorphous TiO2 Nanotubes as Hydrophobic Support for Molecular Sensing by SERS,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 12, pp. 50721–50733, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c14087

  14. [23]

    Vertically Aligned Hybrid Core/Shell Semiconductor Nanowires for Photonics Applications,

    M. Macias‐Montero et al. , “Vertically Aligned Hybrid Core/Shell Semiconductor Nanowires for Photonics Applications,” Adv. Funct. Mater. , vol. 23, no. 48, pp. 5981 – 5989, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1002/adfm.201301120

  15. [24]

    Plasma engineering of microstructured piezo – Triboelectric hybrid nanogenerators for wide bandwidth vibration energy harvesting,

    X. García -Casas et al. , “Plasma engineering of microstructured piezo – Triboelectric hybrid nanogenerators for wide bandwidth vibration energy harvesting,” Nano Energy, vol. 91, p. 106673, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106673

  16. [25]

    In Situ Determination of the Water Condensation Mechanisms on Superhydrophobic and Superhydrophilic Titanium Dioxide Nanotubes,

    M. Macias-Montero et al., “In Situ Determination of the Water Condensation Mechanisms on Superhydrophobic and Superhydrophilic Titanium Dioxide Nanotubes,” Langmuir, vol. 33, no. 26, pp. 6449–6456, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00156

  17. [26]

    Plasma‐Assisted Deposition of TiO 2 3D Nanomembranes: Selective Wetting, Superomniphobicity, and Self‐Cleaning (Adv. Mater. Interfaces 21/2021),

    L. Montes et al., “Plasma‐Assisted Deposition of TiO 2 3D Nanomembranes: Selective Wetting, Superomniphobicity, and Self‐Cleaning (Adv. Mater. Interfaces 21/2021),” Adv. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 8, p. 2170122, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1002/admi.202170122

  18. [27]

    Stable superhydrophobic surface of hierarchical carbon nanotubes on Si micropillar arrays,

    S. He et al. , “Stable superhydrophobic surface of hierarchical carbon nanotubes on Si micropillar arrays,” Nanoscale Res. Lett. , vol. 8, no. 1, p. 412, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-412

  19. [28]

    Role of Multi -scale Hierarchical Structures in Regulating Wetting State and Wetting Properties of Structured Surfaces,

    Y. Jiang et al., “Role of Multi -scale Hierarchical Structures in Regulating Wetting State and Wetting Properties of Structured Surfaces,” J. Bionic Eng., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1347 – 1359, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42235-024-00507-5. 43

  20. [29]

    Metastable Wetting on Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Continuum and Atomistic Views of the Cassie -Baxter-- Wenzel Transition,

    A. Giacomello, M. Chinappi, S. Meloni, and C. M. Casciola, “Metastable Wetting on Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Continuum and Atomistic Views of the Cassie -Baxter-- Wenzel Transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 109, no. 22, p. 226102, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.226102

  21. [30]

    Cassie–Baxter and Wenzel States on a Nanostructured Surface: Phase Diagram, Metastabilities, and Transition Mechanism by Atomistic Free Energy Calculations,

    A. Giacomello, S. Meloni, M. Chinappi, and C. M. Casciola, “Cassie–Baxter and Wenzel States on a Nanostructured Surface: Phase Diagram, Metastabilities, and Transition Mechanism by Atomistic Free Energy Calculations,” Langmuir, vol. 28, no. 29, pp. 10764–10772, Jul. 2012, doi:...

  22. [31]

    Wetting Transition from the Cassie–Baxter State to the Wenzel State on Regularly Nanostructured Surfaces Induced by an Electric Field,

    B.-X. Zhang, S.-L. Wang, and X.-D. Wang, “Wetting Transition from the Cassie–Baxter State to the Wenzel State on Regularly Nanostructured Surfaces Induced by an Electric Field,” Langmuir, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 662 –670, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03808

  23. [32]

    Superhydrophobic Graphene -Based Materials: Surface Construction and Functional Applications,

    Z. Chen, L. Dong, D. Yang, and H. Lu, “Superhydrophobic Graphene -Based Materials: Surface Construction and Functional Applications,” Adv. Mater. , vol. 25, no. 37, pp. 5352–5359, 2013, doi: 10.1002/adma.201302804

  24. [33]

    Surface functionalization of vertical graphene significantly enhances the energy storage capability for symmetric supercapacitors,

    M. He et al., “Surface functionalization of vertical graphene significantly enhances the energy storage capability for symmetric supercapacitors,” Carbon, vol. 216, p. 118511, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118511

  25. [34]

    Nitrogen incorporation in graphene nanowalls via plasma processes: Experiments and simulations,

    A. Jagodar et al., “Nitrogen incorporation in graphene nanowalls via plasma processes: Experiments and simulations,” Appl. Surf. Sci. , vol. 591, p. 153165, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153165

  26. [35]

    N-Graphene Nanowalls via Plasma Nitrogen Incorporation and Substitution: The Experimental Evidence,

    N. M. Santhosh et al., “N-Graphene Nanowalls via Plasma Nitrogen Incorporation and Substitution: The Experimental Evidence,” Nano-Micro Lett., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 53, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-0395-5. 44

  27. [36]

    Hosseini and I

    M. Hosseini and I. Karapanagiotis, Eds., Materials with Extreme Wetting Properties: Methods and Emerging Industrial Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing,

  28. [37]

    Nature -inspired superwettability systems,

    M. Liu, S. Wang, and L. Jiang, “Nature -inspired superwettability systems,” Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 2, no. 7, p. 17036, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.36

  29. [38]

    The design and applications of superomniphobic surfaces,

    A. K. Kota, G. Kwon, and A. Tuteja, “The design and applications of superomniphobic surfaces,” NPG Asia Mater. , vol. 6, no. 7, pp. e109 –e109, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1038/am.2014.34

  30. [39]

    Smooth Transparent Omniphobic Coatings with Remarkable Liquid Repellence,

    F. Mayoussi et al., “Smooth Transparent Omniphobic Coatings with Remarkable Liquid Repellence,” Adv. Mater. Interfaces , vol. 9, no. 28, p. 2201080, 2022, doi: 10.1002/admi.202201080

  31. [40]

    Per - and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): A Comprehensive Review of Environmental Distribution, Health Impacts, and Regulatory Landscape,

    E. Dobrzyńska, P. Wasilewski, and M. Pośniak, “Per - and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): A Comprehensive Review of Environmental Distribution, Health Impacts, and Regulatory Landscape,” Appl. Sci. , vol. 15, no. 22, p. 11884, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app152211884

  32. [41]

    Recent Progress on Fluorine -Free Smooth and Textured Surfaces Exhibiting (Super)omniphobicity and Their Future Prospects | ACS Nano

    “Recent Progress on Fluorine -Free Smooth and Textured Surfaces Exhibiting (Super)omniphobicity and Their Future Prospects | ACS Nano.” Accessed: Feb. 26, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsnano.5c02443

  33. [42]

    Graphene Oxide Assemblies for Sustainable Clean -Water Harvesting and Green-Electricity Generation,

    Y. Huang et al., “Graphene Oxide Assemblies for Sustainable Clean -Water Harvesting and Green-Electricity Generation,” Acc. Mater. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–107, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1021/accountsmr.0c00073

  34. [43]

    Three-dimensional graphene foam based triboelectric nanogenerators for energy systems and autonomous sensors,

    E. Keel et al., “Three-dimensional graphene foam based triboelectric nanogenerators for energy systems and autonomous sensors,” Nano Energy, vol. 112, p. 108475, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108475. 45

  35. [44]

    Hybridization of 2D Nanomaterials with 3D Graphene Architectures for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion,

    Q. Yun et al., “Hybridization of 2D Nanomaterials with 3D Graphene Architectures for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 32, no. 42, p. 2202319, 2022, doi: 10.1002/adfm.202202319

  36. [45]

    Scalable transfer of vertical graphene nanosheets for flexible supercapacitor applications,

    G. Sahoo, S. Ghosh, S. R. Polaki, T. Mathews, and M. Kamruddin, “Scalable transfer of vertical graphene nanosheets for flexible supercapacitor applications,” Nanotechnology, vol. 28, no. 41, p. 415702, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8252

  37. [46]

    A general method for transferring graphene onto soft surfaces,

    J. Song et al. , “A general method for transferring graphene onto soft surfaces,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 356–362, May 2013, doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.63

  38. [47]

    Fabrication of fanlike L -shaped graphene nanostructures with enhanced thermal/electrochemical properties via laser irradiation,

    S. Park et al., “Fabrication of fanlike L -shaped graphene nanostructures with enhanced thermal/electrochemical properties via laser irradiation,” Carbon, vol. 182, pp. 691–699, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.05.045

  39. [48]

    Direct versatile PECVD growth of graphene nanowalls on multiple substrates,

    X. Song et al. , “Direct versatile PECVD growth of graphene nanowalls on multiple substrates,” Mater. Lett. , vol. 137, pp. 25 –28, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.125

  40. [49]

    Molecular Simulation Study on the Wettability of a Surface Texturized with Hierarchical Pillars,

    K. Kim, S. Choi, Z. Zhang, and J. Jang, “Molecular Simulation Study on the Wettability of a Surface Texturized with Hierarchical Pillars,” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 11, p. 4513, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28114513

  41. [50]

    Highly Stable Photoluminescence in Vacuum‐Processed Halide Perovskite Core–Shell 1D Nanostructures,

    J. Castillo-Seoane et al., “Highly Stable Photoluminescence in Vacuum‐Processed Halide Perovskite Core–Shell 1D Nanostructures,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 34, May 2024, doi: 10.1002/adfm.202403763

  42. [51]

    Supported Porous Nanostructures Developed by Plasma Processing of Metal Phthalocyanines and Porphyrins,

    J. Obrero -Pérez et al. , “Supported Porous Nanostructures Developed by Plasma Processing of Metal Phthalocyanines and Porphyrins,” Front. Chem., vol. 8, p. 520, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00520. 46

  43. [52]

    Wetting Properties of Polycrystalline TiO 2 Surfaces: A Scaling Approach to the Roughness Factors,

    A. Borras and A. R. González -Elipe, “Wetting Properties of Polycrystalline TiO 2 Surfaces: A Scaling Approach to the Roughness Factors,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 15875–15882, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1021/la101975e

  44. [53]

    Low-temperature low-power PECVD synthesis of vertically aligned graphene,

    S. Hussain et al., “Low-temperature low-power PECVD synthesis of vertically aligned graphene,” Nanotechnology, vol. 31, no. 39, p. 395604, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1361 - 6528/ab9b4a

  45. [54]

    Growth of graphene nanowalls in low -temperature plasma: Experimental insight in initial growth and importance of wall conditioning,

    A. Jagodar et al. , “Growth of graphene nanowalls in low -temperature plasma: Experimental insight in initial growth and importance of wall conditioning,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 643, p. 158716, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158716

  46. [55]

    Sustainable low temperature carrier gas -free growth of graphene on non -catalytic substrates,

    L. Papale, B. Philippa, B. Makarenko, O. K. Varghese, and M. V. Jacob, “Sustainable low temperature carrier gas -free growth of graphene on non -catalytic substrates,” RSC Sustain., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 995–1002, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1039/D3SU00417A

  47. [56]

    Carbon-Based Nanoarchitectures of Various Dimensions for Water Splitting and Hydrogen Evolution: A Critical Review,

    I. Levchenko et al., “Carbon-Based Nanoarchitectures of Various Dimensions for Water Splitting and Hydrogen Evolution: A Critical Review,” ACS Catal., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 140–188, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c07885

  48. [57]

    Emerging energy and environmental applications of vertically -oriented graphenes,

    Z. Bo, S. Mao, Z. Jun Han, K. Cen, J. Chen, and K. (Ken) Ostrikov, “Emerging energy and environmental applications of vertically -oriented graphenes,” Chem. Soc. Rev. , vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2108–2121, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C4CS00352G

  49. [58]

    A Growth Mechanism for Free-Standing Vertical Graphene,

    J. Zhao, M. Shaygan, J. Eckert, M. Meyyappan, and M. H. Rümmeli, “A Growth Mechanism for Free-Standing Vertical Graphene,” Nano Lett., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 3064 – 3071, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1021/nl501039c

  50. [59]

    A Three -Dimensional Vertically Aligned Functionalized Multilayer Graphene Architecture: An Approach for Graphene - Based Thermal Interfacial Materials,

    Q. Liang, X. Yao, W. Wang, Y. Liu, and C. P. Wong, “A Three -Dimensional Vertically Aligned Functionalized Multilayer Graphene Architecture: An Approach for Graphene - Based Thermal Interfacial Materials,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2392–2401, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1021/nn200181e. 47

  51. [60]

    Evolution and defect analysis of vertical graphene nanosheets,

    S. Ghosh et al., “Evolution and defect analysis of vertical graphene nanosheets,” J. Raman Spectrosc., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 642–649, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jrs.4530

  52. [62]

    Quantifying the sp3/sp2 ratio in functionalized graphene,

    T. Fournier et al., “Quantifying the sp3/sp2 ratio in functionalized graphene,” Carbon, vol. 244, p. 120657, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120657

  53. [63]

    Caracterisation de materiaux carbones par microspectrometrie Raman,

    P. Lespade, A. Marchand, M. Couzi, and F. Cruege, “Caracterisation de materiaux carbones par microspectrometrie Raman,” Carbon, vol. 22, no. 4 –5, pp. 375–385, 1984, doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(84)90009-5

  54. [64]

    Resonant Raman spectroscopy of disordered, amorphous, and diamondlike carbon,

    A. C. Ferrari and J. Robertson, “Resonant Raman spectroscopy of disordered, amorphous, and diamondlike carbon,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 64, no. 7, p. 075414, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.075414

  55. [65]

    The Raman Fingerprint of Graphene,

    A. C. Ferrari et al. , “The Raman Fingerprint of Graphene,” 2006, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.COND-MAT/0606284

  56. [66]

    Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy,

    M. A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, L. G. Cançado, A. Jorio, and R. Saito, “Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy,” Phys Chem Chem Phys, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1276–1290, 2007, doi: 10.1039/B613962K

  57. [67]

    Different angle -resolved polarization configurations of Raman spectroscopy: A case on the basal and edge plane of two - dimensional materials,

    X.-L. Liu, X. Zhang, M. -L. Lin, and P. -H. Tan, “Different angle -resolved polarization configurations of Raman spectroscopy: A case on the basal and edge plane of two - dimensional materials,” Chin. Phys. B , vol. 26, no. 6, p. 067802, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/6/067802

  58. [68]

    Optical Control of Edge Chirality in Graphene,

    M. Begliarbekov, K.-I. Sasaki, O. Sul, E.-H. Yang, and S. Strauf, “Optical Control of Edge Chirality in Graphene,” Nano Lett. , vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 4874 –4878, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1021/nl2027316. 48

  59. [69]

    Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects,

    A. C. Ferrari, “Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects,” Solid State Commun., vol. 143, no. 1 –2, pp. 47–57, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052

  60. [70]

    General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy,

    L. G. Cançado et al., “General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 88, no. 16, p. 163106, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1063/1.2196057

  61. [71]

    Plasma -enhanced chemical vapor deposition synthesis of vertically oriented graphene nanosheets,

    Z. Bo, Y. Yang, J. Chen, K. Yu, J. Yan, and K. Cen, “Plasma -enhanced chemical vapor deposition synthesis of vertically oriented graphene nanosheets,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 12, p. 5180, 2013, doi: 10.1039/c3nr33449j

  62. [72]

    The chemistry of graphene oxide,

    D. R. Dreyer, S. Park, C. W. Bielawski, and R. S. Ruoff, “The chemistry of graphene oxide,” Chem. Soc. Rev., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 228–240, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1039/B917103G

  63. [73]

    Multifunctional transition metal oxide/graphene oxide nanocomposites for catalytic dye degradation, renewable energy, and energy storage applications,

    V. Pasindu, P. Yapa, S. Dabare, and I. Munaweera, “Multifunctional transition metal oxide/graphene oxide nanocomposites for catalytic dye degradation, renewable energy, and energy storage applications,” RSC Adv., vol. 15, no. 40, pp. 33162–33186, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1039/D5RA04806K

  64. [74]

    The NIST X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) database

    C. D. Wagner, “The NIST X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) database”

  65. [75]

    Accessing the robustness of adventitious carbon for charge referencing (correction) purposes in XPS analysis: Insights from a multi -user facility data review,

    M. C. Biesinger, “Accessing the robustness of adventitious carbon for charge referencing (correction) purposes in XPS analysis: Insights from a multi -user facility data review,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 597, p. 153681, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153681

  66. [76]

    Insights and Implications of Intricate Surface Charge Transfer and sp3-Defects in Graphene/Metal Oxide Interfaces,

    D. Belotcerkovtceva et al., “Insights and Implications of Intricate Surface Charge Transfer and sp3-Defects in Graphene/Metal Oxide Interfaces,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 14, no. 31, pp. 36209–36216, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c06626

  67. [77]

    Designing Superoleophobic Surfaces,

    A. Tuteja et al., “Designing Superoleophobic Surfaces,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5856, pp. 1618–1622, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1148326. 49

  68. [78]

    Wetting on Hydrophobic Rough Surfaces: To Be Heterogeneous or Not To Be?,

    A. Marmur, “Wetting on Hydrophobic Rough Surfaces: To Be Heterogeneous or Not To Be?,” Langmuir, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 8343–8348, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1021/la0344682

  69. [79]

    Metastable States and Wetting Transition of Submerged Superhydrophobic Structures,

    P. Lv, Y. Xue, Y. Shi, H. Lin, and H. Duan, “Metastable States and Wetting Transition of Submerged Superhydrophobic Structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, no. 19, p. 196101, May 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.196101

  70. [80]

    Superhydrophobic surfaces and emerging applications: Non-adhesion, energy, green engineering,

    M. Nosonovsky and B. Bhushan, “Superhydrophobic surfaces and emerging applications: Non-adhesion, energy, green engineering,” Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 270–280, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.004

  71. [81]

    Wettability of porous surfaces,

    A. B. D. Cassie and S. Baxter, “Wettability of porous surfaces,” Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 40, p. 546, 1944, doi: 10.1039/tf9444000546

  72. [82]

    Contact Angle Relaxation on Amorphous, Mixed - Phase (Anatase + Rutile), and Anatase TiO2 Films and Its Mechanism,

    Y. Son, M.-K. Lee, and Y. -C. Park, “Contact Angle Relaxation on Amorphous, Mixed - Phase (Anatase + Rutile), and Anatase TiO2 Films and Its Mechanism,” Langmuir, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1850–1860, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03259

  73. [83]

    Toxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide Nanowalls Against Bacteria,

    O. Akhavan and E. Ghaderi, “Toxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide Nanowalls Against Bacteria,” ACS Nano , vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 5731 –5736, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1021/nn101390x

  74. [84]

    Efficiency of grafting of Al2O3, TiO2 and ZrO2 powders by perfluoroalkylsilanes,

    J. Kujawa et al. , “Efficiency of grafting of Al2O3, TiO2 and ZrO2 powders by perfluoroalkylsilanes,” Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 420, pp. 64–73, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.12.021

  75. [85]

    3D core-multishell piezoelectric nanogenerators,

    A. N. Filippin et al., “3D core-multishell piezoelectric nanogenerators,” Nano Energy, vol. 58, pp. 476–483, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.047

  76. [86]

    Modification of Metal Microelectrodes with Vertical Graphene Structure for Enhanced Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine,

    L. Gao et al., “Modification of Metal Microelectrodes with Vertical Graphene Structure for Enhanced Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine,” Adv. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 2400767, May 2025, doi: 10.1002/admi.202400767. 50

  77. [87]

    A Sn -Ta-O-doped vertical graphene electrochemical sensor based on a machine learning prediction model for monitoring cadmium in beverages,

    Z. Tao, L. Su, M. Li, X. Xuan, C. Li, and H. Li, “A Sn -Ta-O-doped vertical graphene electrochemical sensor based on a machine learning prediction model for monitoring cadmium in beverages,” Food Chem. , vol. 493, p. 145744, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.145744. 51 S...

  78. [2021]

    doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59565-4

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.