Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-07-31T17:19:08.313320Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.28119.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-07-31T17:19:08.313320Z
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
15 of 15 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Observation c2ce3e2c-fa2b-43a9-96fe-a99b1132b445 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Unresolved cited work
Reference 1
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7ccf8f50-04c8-4739-98c8-47f600cbfa9a · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language For version 1 prompt, ambiguity is avoided
Reference 2
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 681268cd-b67b-4164-9780-8d920e151a25 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Section 7 concludes, and Section 8 contains a discussion of problematic issues and limitations, as well as the following steps
Reference 3
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f72839a6-5313-4741-9265-f79d5b1e7964 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Uncertain
Reference 4
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2faf6965-545b-4893-912e-29077331913b · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Affect was supposed to be used if the sentence expresses feelings or emotions (e.g
Reference 5
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3d96ba8e-862c-4783-bf6a-7d5f1c257475 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language The assistance of ChatGPT 5.0
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2f9be6d8-9ee2-4b40-a73c-ec3e338caffa · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Do NOT invent extra information [...]
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 94e80cd0-9640-4df2-8262-22f5236b354e · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Instead, we focus on agreement between humans and LLMs
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 565ff6b2-fd29-4c16-a4b2-1e9f71d5d1af · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language When do you need Chain-of-Thought Prompting for ChatGPT?
Reference 12
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8b09dbb4-7dcf-4d5a-88b3-4fb21d90e182 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Despite everything, she stood tall and smiled
Reference 15
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 847c8593-6570-4647-a407-21413b3080b9 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972 Dong, M., & Fang, A
Reference 49
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 13a32c7c-1628-448d-870c-e5bdab50c7bb · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Unresolved cited work
Reference 1960
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7b5aecc8-7e33-4536-8b31-5d57a672783e · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language Still, we consider some aspects in the design of the qualitative study as reasons for low agreement
Reference 2015
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d7796d58-6373-4b96-9f7e-cf9027661d05 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language However, difficult examples were discussed in class together
Reference 2018
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9d434f9f-b37b-4bc9-84cd-9e07feedab59 · outbound
Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language They reported a mean PABAK agreement score of 0.69
Reference 2022
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.