Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Entanglement Swapping with Integrated Narrowband Photon Sources for Quantum Repeaters

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Integrated photon sources under 60 MHz bandwidth can perform entanglement swapping with Bell-capable net visibility using only commercial fibre components.

desk verdict Real experimental first on narrowband integrated entanglement swapping; Bell claim is honest only if kept on the net figure after Raman subtraction. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28184 v1 pith:QHYR2DJ5 submitted 2026-07-30 quant-ph

Mingsong Wu , Leili Esmaeilifar , Rui Ning Wang , Tobias Kippenberg , Rob Thew , Tiff Brydges This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.67.Hk42.50.Dv42.65.Lm03.65.Ud
keywords entanglementswappingquantumrepeatersintegratedphotonicsnarrowbandphotonpairssiliconnitridemicro-ringresonatorstime-binHong-Ou-Mandelinterferencephasestabilisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

First-generation quantum repeaters need narrowband photons that match atomic quantum memories, yet integrated chips usually make photons that are too broadband, and narrowband light is hard to keep phase-stable across separate nodes. This experiment shows that two independent silicon-nitride micro-ring sources, each producing photon pairs narrower than 60 MHz, can swap entanglement at a central station. Independent pumps differing by hundreds of gigahertz were locked together across 1.6 THz with ordinary fibre optics, yielding near-perfect Hong-Ou-Mandel interference and a background-subtracted swapped-state visibility high enough that the final entanglement could violate a Bell inequality. The result is a concrete path from laboratory chips toward field-deployed repeater nodes that do not require bulky high-finesse cavities.

What carries the argument

A fibre 50/50 beam-splitter Bell-state measurement on the Ch27 heralds, combined with a single folded Franson interferometer that both analyses the swapped time-bin state and serves as a frequency/phase bridge locking the two independent pumps across 1.6 THz.

What would settle it

Repeat the swapped-state contrast measurement without background subtraction, or after cladding redesign that removes Raman noise, and check whether the raw visibility still exceeds 1/√2 under the same coincidence windows and independent-pump conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Two independent integrated micro-ring resonators generating energy-time entangled pairs with linewidths below 60 MHz can perform entanglement swapping: a partial Bell-state measurement on the herald photons projects the remaining target photons into a time-bin entangled state whose background-subtracted visibility is 0.88 ± 0.06, sufficient to violate a Bell inequality, while phase and frequency are stabilised over a 1.6 THz span using only all-fibre commercial components and independent pumps of deliberately different frequencies.

Load-bearing premise

The large Raman-scattering background that cuts the raw visibility to 0.54 can be cleanly subtracted so that the remaining net visibility fairly represents the entanglement a real repeater would obtain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Integrated SiN micro-rings with Q > 3×10^6 become usable entanglement resources for solid-state atomic memories that demand <60 MHz photons.
  • Repeater nodes operating at widely separated optical frequencies can share a common phase reference via a single fibre interferometer or an SI-traceable network tone rather than high-finesse cavities.
  • The same architecture can be extended to highly non-degenerate pairs that interface telecom heralds with visible/NIR memory wavelengths.
  • Systems-level frequency stabilisation spanning terahertz becomes a solved engineering block for multi-node quantum networks built from commercial fibre parts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If air cladding or alternative materials suppress cavity-enhanced Raman scattering, the raw rate and visibility may rise enough for real-time repeater operation without post-selected background subtraction.
  • The demonstrated 1.6 THz bridge suggests that a single distributed optical frequency comb could synchronise an entire metropolitan quantum network of heterogeneous memory platforms.
  • Combining these sources with on-chip absorptive memories would close the loop from integrated generation to integrated storage, the missing piece for compact field nodes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports entanglement swapping between two independent continuous-wave-pumped SiN microring-resonator photon-pair sources with linewidths <60 MHz (compatible with several solid-state atomic memories). Independent pumps detuned by ~800 GHz are used; herald photons (Ch27) undergo a partial Bell-state measurement, and the non-degenerate target photons (Ch19/Ch35) are analysed in a single actively stabilised folded Franson interferometer that also serves as a 1.6 THz frequency/phase bridge. Background-subtracted HOM visibility reaches 0.99±0.01 in both frequency-resolved and temporally filtered regimes; the swapped-state interferometric contrast yields raw visibility 0.54±0.04 and net visibility 0.88±0.06. The latter exceeds 1/√2, and a product bound constructed from independently measured energy-time visibilities, HOM visibility and residual phase noise is consistent with the observed net value. Stabilisation is realised entirely with commercial fibre components and Red-Pitaya-based PDH locks.

Significance. The work is a concrete experimental step toward field-deployable first-generation quantum repeaters. Generating memory-compatible narrowband pairs on integrated platforms, performing entanglement swapping with fully independent pumps, and closing a 1.6 THz phase/frequency loop with only off-the-shelf fibre optics are all non-trivial and directly relevant to multi-node architectures. The high net HOM visibility and the consistency check via Eq. (5) strengthen confidence that the sources themselves are of high quality. Explicit recognition that Raman scattering in the SiO2 cladding is the dominant background, together with a concrete path (air cladding / non-degenerate visible–telecom pairs), gives the result a clear forward trajectory. These strengths make the paper suitable for a specialised quantum-optics or quantum-network journal once the net-versus-raw framing is tightened.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3.2] Abstract and Results §3.2: the claim that the swapped entanglement “would be sufficient to violate a Bell inequality” rests exclusively on the background-subtracted visibility V_net=0.88±0.06. The raw visibility is only 0.54±0.04, below 1/√2. The dominant background is cavity-enhanced Raman scattering in the SiO2 cladding (§3.1), which occupies the same spectral-temporal modes as the pairs and would be stored or detected in a real repeater link. While background subtraction is standard for source characterisation, the repeater-oriented narrative requires an explicit statement that the physical state as presently produced does not clear the Bell threshold, and that the Bell-capable figure of merit is contingent on a future cladding or spectral redesign. The present wording (“would be”) is slightly ambiguous on this point.
  2. [§2.2, §3.2] §2.2 and §3.2: the BSM coincidence window (±0.7 ns) and the target analysis window (±1.5 ns) are free parameters that directly enter both the reported visibility and the claim of “high spectral purity.” The Supplementary Material is said to discuss window dependence, but the main text should quantify how V_net and the four-fold rate change when the windows are varied by a factor of two, so that a reader can judge robustness of the Bell-threshold conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 caption and main text: the fit models for the cross-correlations and HOM traces are deferred entirely to the Supplement. A one-sentence statement of the functional form (double-exponential convolved with Gaussian jitter; quantum-beat envelope) in the main text would aid readability.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 lists linewidths extracted from cross-correlations; the corresponding loaded Q-factors quoted in the Introduction (>3×10^6) are not tabulated. Adding them would make the memory-compatibility claim immediately verifiable.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (5)] Eq. (5) is introduced as an estimate of the expected swapped visibility. Clarify whether V_HOM is taken as the net or raw value; consistency with the product ~0.874 requires the net figure.
  4. [§3.2] The four-fold coincidence rate (~0.03 Hz) is stated once; a brief remark on the integration time per phase point (~3 h) and total acquisition span (several days) would help readers assess practicality.
  5. [Abstract] Minor typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “highphotonindistinguishability”, missing spaces after commas in the abstract). A careful copy-edit pass is warranted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: experimental visibility measurements with an independent consistency check, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

This is an experimental demonstration paper. The load-bearing claims (net HOM visibility 0.99±0.01; net swapped-state visibility 0.88±0.06; raw 0.54±0.04) are direct fits to measured coincidence contrast versus scanned phase, not quantities derived from definitions that already encode the result. The product bound V_swap = V_ET1·V_ET2·V_HOM·V_φ (Eq. 5) multiplies independently measured constituent visibilities and a phase-lock estimate to produce an expected upper bound (~0.874) that is then compared to the measured swapped visibility; agreement is a consistency check, not a tautology that forces the outcome. Session-wise phase offsets φ0 in the contrast fit I(Δφ)=V cos(Δφ+φ0) are nuisance parameters, not the claimed visibility. Background subtraction is a data-analysis choice that affects interpretation of Bell-capability (raw vs net), but it is not circular reasoning. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citation uniqueness claim, or renamed known result appears in the derivation chain. Score 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Experimental quantum-optics paper. Load-bearing content is measured visibilities and a stabilisation architecture, not new postulates. Assumptions are standard quantum-optics and lab-practice choices (energy-time entanglement under CW SFWM, partial BSM post-selection, background as subtractable accidentals, shared Franson as proxy for memory-stable readout). Free parameters are analysis choices (coincidence windows, piecewise phase offsets) and device-dependent noise, not theory constants invented to fit a claim.

free parameters (4)
  • BSM coincidence window = ±0.7 ns (swap); ±15 ns and ±0.7 ns (HOM)
    Chosen ±0.7 ns (and ±15 ns for frequency-resolved HOM) relative to ~5 ns coherence time to select a single temporal mode and set the frequency-resolved vs unresolved regime; directly affects reported visibilities.
  • Target time-bin analysis coincidence window = ±1.5 ns
    Chosen ±1.5 ns for swapped-state coincidences; analysis cut that enters the contrast and rate.
  • Piecewise interferometer phase offsets φ0 per session = multiple session-dependent values (Supplement)
    Data taken over several days with relock; each session gets its own φ0 in the contrast fit I=V cos(Δφ+φ0). Nuisance parameters for extracting V.
  • Background level for net visibility subtraction = procedure in Supplement; not a single scalar in main text
    Raman and other accidentals estimated and subtracted to go from V_raw=0.54 to V_net=0.88; subtraction model is load-bearing for the Bell-threshold claim.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption CW cavity-enhanced SFWM in high-Q SiN MRRs produces energy-time entangled pairs well described by a coherent superposition over generation times within the pump coherence.
    Standard treatment used to write |ψ⟩_A(B) and the two-source product state (Eq. 1); underpins time-bin post-selection.
  • domain assumption Detector clicks at t and t+τ on the two BSM outputs implement a partial projection onto |Ψ−⟩ in the time-bin basis when the coincidence window is narrow versus photon coherence time.
    Stated in §2.2 with citations to Brendel/Halder-type time-bin BSM; only Ψ− is heralded.
  • ad hoc to paper Raman and other background counts are uncorrelated accidentals that can be estimated and subtracted without removing the genuine swapped entanglement contribution.
    Required to promote raw V=0.54 to net V=0.88 and to claim Bell-violation capability; methodology deferred to Supplement.
  • ad hoc to paper A single shared folded Franson interferometer on highly non-degenerate targets is a fair proof-of-principle proxy for the interferometric stability of absorptive solid-state quantum memory readout at separated nodes.
    Explicitly argued in §2.3; future networks would use memories at each node rather than one fibre interferometer.
  • domain assumption Swapped visibility is upper-bounded by the product V_ET1·V_ET2·V_HOM·V_φ of independently characterized constituent visibilities.
    Used in §3.2 with citations; consistency check (expected ~0.874 vs measured 0.88), not a new law.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement Swapping with Integrated Narrowband Photon Sources for Quantum Repeaters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QHYR2DJ5

@misc{pith2026260728184,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement Swapping with Integrated Narrowband Photon Sources for Quantum Repeaters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QHYR2DJ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28184}
}
abstract

Promising implementations of first generation quantum repeaters are predicted to require atomic-based quantum memory systems interfaced with photonic sources. Integrated photonics provides a promising solution for fibre-based, field-deployed operation of quantum repeaters, however many leading quantum memory platforms require narrow-bandwidth photons that are challenging to generate with integrated photonics. Narrowband photons also present significant technical challenges when implementing entanglement-swapping, particularly with regards to systems-level stabilisation. This work addresses some of these fundamental and technical challenges, by demonstrating entanglement-swapping using state-of-the-art integrated photon sources with bandwidths compatible with multiple atomic-based quantum memory platforms. We obtained a background-subtracted (net) HOM visibility of 0.99$\,\pm\,$0.01, showing high photon indistinguishability and purity, with a net swapped state visibility of $\mathcal{V}$=0.88$\,\pm\,$0.06 demonstrating that the final entanglement would be sufficient to violate a Bell inequality. The experiment used independent pump lasers for each photon pair source, with highly different frequencies to mimic entanglement swapping between different repeater nodes or platforms. Phase and frequency stabilisation spanning 1.6 THz was achieved using all-fibre, commercially-available components. These results address important challenges in implementing field-deployed quantum repeaters, from the integrated photonic solutions for narrowband photon pairs, to systems-level stabilisation between independent quantum repeater nodes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28184 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Simplified schematic of one implementation of a quantum repeater network. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simplified schematic of the experimental setup. The general cavity-lock [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) and b) Cross-correlation measurements for Source A and Source B, respectively. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Interferometric contrast of the entanglement swapping measurement as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Distributed quantum computation based on small quantum registers,

    L. Jiang, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Sørensen, and M. D. Lukin, “Distributed quantum computation based on small quantum registers,” Phys. Rev. A76, 062323 (2007)

    2007

  2. [2]

    Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link,

    D. Maina, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger,et al., “Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link,” Nature 638, 383–388 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Review of distributed quantum computing: From single qpu to high performance quantum computing,

    D. Barral, F. J. Cardama, G. Díaz-Camacho,et al., “Review of distributed quantum computing: From single qpu to high performance quantum computing,” Comput. Sci. Rev.57, 100747 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    The quantum internet,

    H. J. Kimble, “The quantum internet,” Nature453, 1023–1030 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, “Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,” Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Large baseline optical imaging assisted by single photons and linear quantum optics,

    M. M. Marchese and P. Kok, “Large baseline optical imaging assisted by single photons and linear quantum optics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 160801 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Entanglement-assistednon-localopticalinterferometryinaquantumnetwork,

    P.-J.Stas,Y.-C.Wei,M.Sirotin,etal.,“Entanglement-assistednon-localopticalinterferometryinaquantumnetwork,” Nature651, 326–332 (2026)

    2026

  8. [8]

    Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution,

    M. Takeoka, S. Guha, and M. M. Wilde, “Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution,” Nat. Commun.5, 5235 (2014)

    2014

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 1000 km Fiber Distance,

    Y. Liu, W.-J. Zhang, C. Jiang,et al., “Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 1000 km Fiber Distance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 210801 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics,

    N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, “Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 33–80 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Quantumrepeaters: Fromquantumnetworkstothequantuminternet,

    K.Azuma,S.E.Economou,D.Elkouss,etal.,“Quantumrepeaters: Fromquantumnetworkstothequantuminternet,” Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 045006 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    “event-ready-detectors

    M.Żukowski, A.Zeilinger, M.A.Horne, andA.K.Ekert, ““event-ready-detectors”bellexperimentviaentanglement swapping,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 4287–4290 (1993)

    1993

  5. [13]

    Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication,

    H.-J. Briegel, W. Dür, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication,” Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5932–5935 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,” Nature414, 413–418 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    Photon-echo quantum memory in solid state systems,

    W. Tittel, M. Afzelius, T. Chaneliére,et al., “Photon-echo quantum memory in solid state systems,” Laser Photonics Rev.4, 244–267 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Quantumnetworksusingrare-earthions,

    W.Tittel,M.Afzelius,A.Kinos,etal.,“Quantumnetworksusingrare-earthions,”QuantumSci.Technol.10,033002 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Telecom-heralded entanglement between multimode solid-state quantum memories,

    D. Lago-Rivera, S. Grandi, J. V. Rakonjac,et al., “Telecom-heralded entanglement between multimode solid-state quantum memories,” Nature594, 37–40 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Heralded entanglement of on-demand spin-wave solid-state quantum memories for multiplexed quantum network links,

    J. Hänni, A. E. Rodríguez-Moldes, F. Appas,et al., “Heralded entanglement of on-demand spin-wave solid-state quantum memories for multiplexed quantum network links,” Phys. Rev. X15, 041003 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Broadbandandlong-durationopticalmemoryin 171𝑌𝑏 3+ :𝑌 2𝑆𝑖𝑂5,

    T.S.Mejia,L.Nicolas,A.G.Rodriguez,etal.,“Broadbandandlong-durationopticalmemoryin 171𝑌𝑏 3+ :𝑌 2𝑆𝑖𝑂5,” Quantum Sci. Technol.11, 015004 (2026)

    2026

  12. [20]

    2022Roadmaponintegratedquantumphotonics,

    G.Moody,V.J.Sorger,D.J.Blumenthal,etal.,“2022Roadmaponintegratedquantumphotonics,”J.Phys.Photonics 4, 012501 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon,

    D. Llewellyn, Y. Ding, I. I. Faruque,et al., “Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon,” Nat. Phys.16, 148–153 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Entanglement swapping between independent and asynchronous integrated photon-pair sources,

    F. Samara, N. Maring, A. Martin,et al., “Entanglement swapping between independent and asynchronous integrated photon-pair sources,” Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 145024 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Ultralow-loss integrated photonics enables bright, narrowband, photon-pair sources,

    R. Chen, Y.-H. Luo, J. Long,et al., “Ultralow-loss integrated photonics enables bright, narrowband, photon-pair sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 083803 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Quantum teleportation from telecom photons to erbium-ion ensembles,

    Y.-Y. An, Q. He, W. Xue,et al., “Quantum teleportation from telecom photons to erbium-ion ensembles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 010804 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Entangling independent photons by time measurement,

    M. Halder, A. Beveratos, N. Gisin,et al., “Entangling independent photons by time measurement,” Nat. Phys.3, 692–695 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Heralding single photons without spectral factorability,

    Y.-P. Huang, J. B. Altepeter, and P. Kumar, “Heralding single photons without spectral factorability,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 043826 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Photonic Damascene process for integrated high-Q microresonator based nonlinear photonics ,

    M. H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, V. Brasch,et al., “Photonic Damascene process for integrated high-Q microresonator based nonlinear photonics ,” Optica3, 20–25 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator,

    R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski,et al., “Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator,” Appl. Phys. B31, 97–105 (1983)

    1983

  21. [29]

    High-rate photon pairs and sequential Time-Bin entanglement withSi3N4 microring resonators,

    F. Samara, A. Martin, C. Autebert,et al., “High-rate photon pairs and sequential Time-Bin entanglement withSi3N4 microring resonators,” Opt. Express27, 19309–19318 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Direct measurement of the recovery time of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors,

    C. Autebert, G. Gras, E. Amri,et al., “Direct measurement of the recovery time of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors,” J. Appl. Phys.128, 074504 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication,

    J. Brendel, N. Gisin, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2594–2597 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Asynchronous Multi-photon Interference for Quantum Networks,

    B. Baghdasaryan, K. Lozano-Méndez, M. Leipe,et al., “Asynchronous Multi-photon Interference for Quantum Networks,” (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Photonicquantuminformationwithtime-bins: Principlesandapplications,

    A.Singh,A.Sethia,L.Esmaeilifar,etal.,“Photonicquantuminformationwithtime-bins: Principlesandapplications,” (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Quantum storage of photonic entanglement in a crystal,

    C. Clausen, I. Usmani, F. Bussières,et al., “Quantum storage of photonic entanglement in a crystal,” Nature469, 508–511 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Time entanglement between a photon and a spin wave in a multimode solid-state quantum memory,

    K. Kutluer, E. Distante, B. Casabone,et al., “Time entanglement between a photon and a spin wave in a multimode solid-state quantum memory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 030501 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    High visibility time-energy entangled photons from a silicon nanophotonic chip,

    S. Rogers, D. Mulkey, X. Lu,et al., “High visibility time-energy entangled photons from a silicon nanophotonic chip,” ACS Photonics3, 1754–1761 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    SI-traceable frequency dissemination at 1572.06 nm in a stabilized fiber network with ring topology,

    D. Husmann, L.-G. Bernier, M. Bertrand,et al., “SI-traceable frequency dissemination at 1572.06 nm in a stabilized fiber network with ring topology,” Opt. Express29, 24592–24605 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    High visibility hong-ou-mandel interference via a time-resolved coincidence measurement,

    Y. Tsujimoto, Y. Sugiura, M. Tanaka,et al., “High visibility hong-ou-mandel interference via a time-resolved coincidence measurement,” Opt. Express25, 12069–12080 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, “Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2044–2046 (1987)

  32. [40]

    Time-resolved two-photon quantum interference,

    T. Legero, T. Wilk, A. Kuhn, and G. Rempe, “Time-resolved two-photon quantum interference,” Appl. Phys. B77, 797–802 (2003)

    2003

  33. [41]

    Quantum beat of two single photons,

    T. Legero, T. Wilk, M. Hennrich,et al., “Quantum beat of two single photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 070503 (2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Hybrid Nonlinear Effects in Photonic Integrated Circuits,

    A. Pal, A. Ghosh, S. Zhang,et al., “Hybrid Nonlinear Effects in Photonic Integrated Circuits,” (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Broadband Visible Wavelength Microcomb Generation In Silicon Nitride Microrings Through Air-Clad Dispersion Engineering,

    G. Moille, D. Westly, R. Shrestha,et al., “Broadband Visible Wavelength Microcomb Generation In Silicon Nitride Microrings Through Air-Clad Dispersion Engineering,” Laser Photonics Rev.19, 2401746 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Experimentalrealizationofeinstein-podolsky-rosen-bohmgedankenexperiment: A new violation of bell’s inequalities,

    A.Aspect,P.Grangier,andG.Roger,“Experimentalrealizationofeinstein-podolsky-rosen-bohmgedankenexperiment: A new violation of bell’s inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 91–94 (1982)

    1982

  37. [45]

    Separability criterion for density matrices,

    A. Peres, “Separability criterion for density matrices,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413–1415 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 880–884 (1969)

    1969

  39. [47]

    Entanglement swapping and swapped entanglement,

    S. M. Zangi, C. Shukla, A. ur Rahman, and B. Zheng, “Entanglement swapping and swapped entanglement,” Entropy 25(2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Entanglement swapping of noisy states: A kind of superadditivity in nonclassicality,

    A. Sen(De), U. Sen, i. c. v. Brukner,et al., “Entanglement swapping of noisy states: A kind of superadditivity in nonclassicality,” Phys. Rev. A72, 042310 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    Strong interactions between integrated microresonators and alkali atomic vapors: towards single-atom, single-photon operation,

    R. Zektzer, X. Lu, K. T. Hoang,et al., “Strong interactions between integrated microresonators and alkali atomic vapors: towards single-atom, single-photon operation,” Optica11, 1376–1384 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.