Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 114 references

ATLAS finds no excess of pair-produced vector-like T quarks decaying via exotic spin-0 particles to diphotons, and excludes T masses below 1620 GeV in a simplified composite-Higgs model.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 09:11 UTC pith:ATDX7J2Q

load-bearing objection First ATLAS search in the VLQ→St, S→γγ cascade: clean null result with usable fiducial limits and a solid model exclusion.

arxiv 2607.28381 v1 pith:ATDX7J2Q submitted 2026-07-30 hep-ex

Search for pair-production of vector-like T quarks decaying into a top quark and a spin-0 particle in the diphoton final state in proton proton collisions at sqrt{s}=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

classification hep-ex PACS 14.80.-j13.85.Rm12.60.-i
keywords vector-like quarkstop partnersexotic scalarsdiphoton resonanceATLASRun 2fiducial cross-section limitscomposite Higgs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first ATLAS search for pair-produced vector-like top partners that each decay into a top quark plus a new spin-0 particle S, with at least one S decaying to a photon pair. Using the full Run-2 dataset of 140 fb⁻¹ of 13 TeV proton–proton collisions, the analysis looks for a resonant diphoton peak in events that also carry large visible transverse momentum and missing energy. No significant excess above Standard Model background is seen. The result is cast as model-independent upper limits on the fiducial cross-section times branching ratios across a wide (m_T, m_S) plane, and is reinterpreted in a concrete partial-compositeness model to exclude vector-like quark masses below 1620 GeV for the most sensitive diphoton scenario. The search closes a previously unexplored decay channel that standard VLQ searches assuming only SM bosons would miss.

Core claim

No significant excess over the Standard Model background is observed in the diphoton mass spectrum of high-p_T + E_T^miss events. Consequently, 95% CL upper limits are set on the fiducial production cross-section times branching ratios σ_fid(pp→TT̄)·B(S→γγ)·B(S→X) for m_T in [1000,1800] GeV and m_S in [200,1200] GeV. In the simplified model of Ref. [61] with degenerate VLQs and scalars, T masses below 1620 GeV are excluded over the full m_S range considered in the 2γ scenario.

What carries the argument

The scalar sum p_T^vis + E_T^miss that slices the data into orthogonal control, validation and signal regions, combined with an unbinned simultaneous fit of the diphoton invariant mass m_γγ in four signal regions using a double-sided Crystal Ball signal shape and a single-parameter exponential background, converted to fiducial cross-section limits via interpolated acceptance maps.

Load-bearing premise

The search assumes every vector-like T decays exclusively to a top plus S and that both particles are extremely narrow, so the quoted mass limits and efficiency maps fail if those branching ratios or widths are substantially different.

What would settle it

A statistically significant resonant peak in the diphoton mass spectrum inside any of the four high-p_T^vis + E_T^miss signal regions that cannot be absorbed by the background-only fit, or a future measurement showing that the true B(T→St) is far below 100% or that the widths are large enough to invalidate the narrow-width acceptance maps.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Standard VLQ mass limits that assume only decays to SM bosons do not cover the exotic S cascade; those limits must be re-evaluated when S is present.
  • Fiducial cross-section limits can be directly recast onto any model producing TT̄ → (St)(St) with at least one S→γγ, without re-running the full analysis.
  • In the simplified partial-compositeness model, the 2γ channel alone already excludes T masses below 1620 GeV across the entire allowed m_S range.
  • Future higher-luminosity runs can tighten the same fiducial limits simply by increasing the data set in the same regions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If composite-Higgs models generically predict light exotic scalars alongside top partners, this channel becomes one of the few direct probes that previous multi-lepton or multi-jet VLQ searches systematically miss.
  • The large separation power of p_T^vis + E_T^miss suggests that similar high-mass-scale discriminants could open other exotic cascade searches (e.g., S→Zγ or S→tt̄) with the same dataset.
  • A non-zero single-production contribution or finite-width interference, currently neglected, would dilute the pair-production limits and should be checked once couplings are no longer tiny.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The ATLAS Collaboration searches for pair-produced vector-like T quarks, each decaying as T→St with at least one resonant S→γγ, in 140 fb−1 of 13 TeV pp data. Events are selected with ≥2 photons, ≥1 b-jet and large p_T^vis+E_T^miss, and are partitioned into four orthogonal signal regions. The m_γγ spectrum is fit simultaneously with a double-sided Crystal Ball signal shape and a data-driven single-exponential continuum background, the latter validated in control and validation regions with a spurious-signal envelope. No significant excess is observed. 95% CL upper limits are set on the fiducial cross-section times branching ratios σ_fid(pp→TT̄)·B(S→γγ)·B(S→X) over m_T∈[1000,1800] GeV and m_S∈[200,1200] GeV (kinematically allowed), and are reinterpreted in a simplified partial-compositeness model to exclude m_T<1620 GeV in the 2γ scenario.

Significance. This is the first dedicated VLQ search in the diphoton-plus-heavy-object final state that targets cascade decays through an exotic spin-0 state rather than SM bosons. The primary deliverable—fiducial cross-section limits defined by particle-level photon kinematics—is explicitly constructed for reinterpretation and is therefore of lasting phenomenological value. The analysis employs standard, well-documented ATLAS high-mass diphoton techniques (data-driven exponential background, spurious-signal systematics from smoothed CR/VR templates, DSCB signal shapes, simultaneous unbinned CLs fits) and supplies a complete systematic table and efficiency-interpolation maps. The secondary model-dependent contour under the degeneracy assumptions of Ref. [61] usefully illustrates the reach of the search.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5] Section 5 and Eq. (1): the exponential background form yields p-values as low as 2% in some CRs. A brief quantitative statement that alternative functional forms (higher-order exponentials) were tested and did not improve the description, already mentioned in passing, would strengthen the justification for the single-parameter choice.
  2. [Section 6] Section 6, definition of C_S^{γγX}: the text states that the constant α equals unity for the 4γ channel and two elsewhere. A short explicit sentence clarifying that this factor accounts for the combinatorial indistinguishability of the two S→γγ decays would remove any residual ambiguity for readers reinterpreting the limits.
  3. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the vertical dashed lines that delimit CR/VR/SR are helpful, but the legend and axis labels are dense; increasing font size or splitting the legend would improve readability in the published version.
  4. [Section 7, Figure 5] Figure 5 caption and surrounding text: the statement that limits for γγX (X with ≤1 photon) are essentially identical is important for reinterpretation. Adding a parenthetical note that the 4γ limits are a factor of two weaker solely because of the α=1 convention would make this immediately clear to non-ATLAS readers.
  5. [Table 1 / Section 6] Table 1: event yields in the highest SR (SR4) are only 26. While the analysis is statistically limited and the fit is unbinned, a one-sentence remark on the stability of the asymptotic CLs approximation in this low-count regime (or a cross-check with toys) would be reassuring.
  6. [Title page] Minor typographical clean-up: the running header and title contain spacing artefacts (“ORGANISA TION”, “vector-like𝑻quarks”); these should be corrected in production.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard data-driven search with CLs limits; assumptions are stated, not derived as predictions.

full rationale

This is a conventional ATLAS Run-2 search. The central results are 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross-section times branching ratios extracted from unbinned profile-likelihood fits to the observed m_γγ spectra in four orthogonal SRs, with a data-driven exponential background and DSCB signal shapes from simulation. The CLs procedure and spurious-signal envelope are standard and do not force a null result by construction; the data could have shown an excess. Fiducial efficiencies and RBF interpolation convert fitted yields into σ_fid·B limits under explicitly stated assumptions (B(T→St)=100%, NWA Γ/M=0.1%), which are inputs to the interpretation, not outputs claimed as first-principles predictions. The secondary m_T exclusion contour uses an external QCD cross-section (Hathor+NNPDF4.0) and branching ratios from the independent theory paper Ref. [61], with simplified degeneracy assumptions clearly labelled. Self-citations are to ATLAS detector/performance and prior diphoton methodology papers; none supply a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that closes the derivation loop. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own fitted input or definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental search paper. Central claims rest on standard collider-physics assumptions (SM background composition, detector response, NWA signal generation, 100% T→St branching) plus analysis choices (exponential background, DSCB signal, fiducial photon cuts, RBF efficiency interpolation). No new fundamental entities are postulated; VLQ and S are search targets motivated by cited theory.

free parameters (3)
  • Background exponential slope τ (per region) = Floated per SR in the likelihood
    Single free shape parameter of f(m_γγ)=N exp(-m_γγ/τ) left free in the fit to data in each SR; choice of functional form is validated but not unique.
  • DSCB signal-shape parameters (linear in m_S) = From MC fits; core width 1.8–10.2 GeV over m_S=200–1200 GeV
    Double-sided Crystal Ball parameters extracted from simulated signal samples and evolved linearly with m_S; used to model the resonant peak in every SR.
  • RBF interpolation hyperparameters for efficiency maps C_S^{γγX}
    Radial-basis-function multi-quadric kernel plus logit transform used to interpolate correction factors across the (m_T, m_S) grid; hyperparameter stability assigned as 1–15% systematic.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption B(T→St)=100% for both pair-produced partners
    Stated in Sec. 1 and Sec. 6; all acceptance and limit translations assume this branching ratio.
  • domain assumption Narrow-width approximation Γ/M=0.1% for T and S (interference and single production negligible)
    Sec. 3; justifies treating signal as pure resonant peak and neglecting single-T production.
  • ad hoc to paper Continuum diphoton plus misidentified-jet/electron background is well described by a single-exponential in m_γγ in each SR
    Sec. 5; higher-order exponentials did not improve fits; spurious-signal envelope quantifies residual bias.
  • domain assumption Fast calorimeter simulation plus pile-up overlay adequately models photon, jet, and E_T^miss response for signal efficiency
    Sec. 3; standard ATLAS fast-sim chain; residual photon energy scale/resolution systematics are propagated.
  • ad hoc to paper In the model reinterpretation, the two top partners and the four spin-0 states are mass-degenerate
    Sec. 7; simplification relative to the full Banerjee et al. spectrum used to draw exclusion contours.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 56816 in / 2995 out tokens · 56680 ms · 2026-07-31T09:11:20.858900+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A search for pair-produced vector-like T quarks (VLQs) is presented. Each VLQ is assumed to decay into a top quark and an exotic (pseudo)scalar S. The search targets events with at least one resonant $S \to \gamma\gamma$ decay and large summed transverse momentum and missing transverse momentum from other final-state particles. The analysis uses data from $pp$ collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector from 2015 to 2018 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. This is the first VLQ search performed in this final state. No significant excess over the Standard Model background is observed. The analysis is model-independent to a large extent but targets cascade decays into final states with electroweak bosons or $t\bar{t}$. Results are provided in the form of upper limits on the fiducial cross-section times branching ratio as a function of the masses of the VLQ and the spin-0 particle. The fiducial volume is defined by kinematic requirements on the photons from the spin-0 decay.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 98 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

  2. [2]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

  3. [3]

    D. B. Kaplan and H. Georgi,SU(2)×U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 183

  4. [4]

    D. B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: A new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses, Nucl. Phys. B365(1991) 259

  5. [5]

    Agashe, R

    K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol,The Minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B719(2005) 165, arXiv:hep-ph/0412089

  6. [6]

    Evans and P

    L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3(2008) S08001

  7. [7]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for bottom-type, vectorlike quark pair production in a fully hadronic final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 112004, arXiv:2008.09835 [hep-ex]

  8. [8]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for pair-production of vector-like quarks in𝑝𝑝 collision events at√𝑠=13TeV with at least one leptonically decaying𝑍boson and a third-generation quark with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 138019, arXiv:2210.15413 [hep-ex]

  9. [9]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in leptonic final states in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP07(2023) 020, arXiv:2209.07327 [hep-ex]

  10. [10]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair-production of vector-like quarks in lepton+jets final states containing at least one𝑏-tagged jet using the Run 2 data from the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B854(2024) 138743, arXiv:2401.17165 [hep-ex]

  11. [11]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair-produced vector-like top and bottom partners in events with large missing transverse momentum in𝑝𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 719, arXiv:2212.05263 [hep-ex]

  12. [12]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair production of a new heavy quark that decays into a𝑊 boson and a light quark in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 112007, arXiv:1509.04261 [hep-ex]

  13. [13]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair-produced vectorlike quarks coupling to light quarks in the lepton plus jets final state using13TeV𝑝𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 052009, arXiv:2405.19862 [hep-ex]

  14. [14]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair production of heavy vectorlike quarks decaying into hadronic final states in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 092005, arXiv:1808.01771 [hep-ex]

  15. [15]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for pair production of vectorlike quarks in the fully hadronic final state, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 072001, arXiv:1906.11903 [hep-ex]. 17

  16. [16]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for pair production of heavy vector-like quarks decaying to high-𝑝T𝑊 bosons and𝑏 quarks in the lepton-plus-jets final state in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2017) 141, arXiv:1707.03347 [hep-ex]

  17. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for new phenomena in events with same-charge leptons and𝑏-jets in𝑝𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP12(2018) 039, arXiv:1807.11883 [hep-ex]

  18. [18]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for vector-like𝑇and𝐵quark pairs in final states with leptons at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP08(2018) 177, arXiv:1805.04758 [hep-ex]

  19. [19]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for vector-like quarks in events with two oppositely charged leptons and jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 364, arXiv:1812.09768 [hep-ex]

  20. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for pair production of vector-like top quarks in events with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in√𝑠=13TeV𝑝𝑝 collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08(2017) 052, arXiv:1705.10751 [hep-ex]

  21. [21]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for pair production of up-type vector-like quarks and for four-top-quark events in final states with multiple𝑏-jets with the ATLAS detector, JHEP07(2018) 089, arXiv:1803.09678 [hep-ex]

  22. [22]

    CMS Collaboration,A search for bottom-type vectorlike quark pair production in dileptonic and fully hadronic final states in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 052004, arXiv:2402.13808 [hep-ex]

  23. [23]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for pair production of heavy vector-like quarks decaying into high-𝑝T𝑊bosons and top quarks in the lepton-plus-jets final state in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08(2018) 048, arXiv:1806.01762 [hep-ex]

  24. [24]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for top quark partners with charge 5/3 in the same-sign dilepton and single-lepton final states in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP03(2019) 082, arXiv:1810.03188 [hep-ex]

  25. [25]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in the𝑏𝑊¯𝑏𝑊channel from proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 82, arXiv:1710.01539 [hep-ex]

  26. [26]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for pair and single production of vectorlike quarks in final states with at least one𝑍 boson decaying into a pair of electrons or muons in𝑝𝑝 collision data collected with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 112010, arXiv:1806.10555 [hep-ex]

  27. [27]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single production of a vectorlike𝑇 quark decaying into a Higgs boson and top quark with fully hadronic final states using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 092012, arXiv:2201.07045 [hep-ex]

  28. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for singly produced vector-like top partners in multilepton final states with139fb−1 of𝑝𝑝collision data at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 112012, arXiv:2307.07584 [hep-ex]. 18

  29. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single production of vector-like𝑇 quarks decaying into𝐻𝑡 or𝑍𝑡 in𝑝𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08(2023) 153, arXiv:2305.03401 [hep-ex]

  30. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for new particles in final states with a boosted top quark and missing transverse momentum in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP05(2024) 263, arXiv:2402.16561 [hep-ex]

  31. [31]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for single production of a vector-like𝑇 quark decaying to a top quark and a𝑍boson in the final state with jets and missing transverse momentum at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP05(2022) 093, arXiv:2201.02227 [hep-ex]

  32. [32]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for a vector-like quark𝑇′→𝑡𝐻via the diphoton decay mode of the Higgs boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP09(2023) 057, arXiv:2302.12802 [hep-ex]

  33. [33]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for electroweak production of a vector-like𝑇quark using fully hadronic final states, JHEP01(2020) 036, arXiv:1909.04721 [hep-ex]

  34. [34]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for single production of a vector-like𝑇quark decaying to a𝑍boson and a top quark in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B781(2018) 574, arXiv:1708.01062 [hep-ex]

  35. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for large missing transverse momentum in association with one top-quark in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP05(2019) 041, arXiv:1812.09743 [hep-ex]

  36. [36]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for production of a single vectorlike quark decaying to𝑡𝐻 or𝑡𝑍 in the all-hadronic final state in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 072012, arXiv:2405.05071 [hep-ex]

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into𝑊𝑏 in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP05(2019) 164, arXiv:1812.07343 [hep-ex]

  38. [38]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a𝑏 quark and a𝑊boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 634, arXiv:1701.08328 [hep-ex]

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single vector-like𝐵quark production and decay via 𝐵𝑡𝑜𝑏𝐻(𝑏 ¯𝑏)in𝑝𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11(2023) 168, arXiv:2308.02595 [hep-ex]

  40. [40]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying to a𝑏quark and a Higgs boson, JHEP06(2018) 031, arXiv:1802.01486 [hep-ex]

  41. [41]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying to a top quark and a𝑊boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 90, arXiv:1809.08597 [hep-ex]

  42. [42]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into𝑊(ℓ𝜈)𝑏 in 𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP12(2025) 012, arXiv:2506.15515 [hep-ex]. 19

  43. [43]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single-production of vector-like quarks decaying into𝑊𝑏 in the fully hadronic final state in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP02(2025) 075, arXiv:2409.20273 [hep-ex]

  44. [44]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Combination of searches for singly produced vectorlike top quarks in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 012012, arXiv:2408.08789 [hep-ex]

  45. [45]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for single production of a vector-like𝑇 quark decaying to a top quark and a neutral scalar boson in the lepton+jets final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, (2025), arXiv:2510.25874 [hep-ex]

  46. [46]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for a new heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a neutral scalar boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, (2026), arXiv:2604.10729 [hep-ex]

  47. [47]

    Gripaios, A

    B. Gripaios, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and J. Serra,Beyond the Minimal Composite Higgs Model, JHEP04(2009) 070, arXiv:0902.1483 [hep-ph]

  48. [48]

    Barnard, T

    J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta and T. S. Ray, UV descriptions of composite Higgs models without elementary scalars, JHEP02(2014) 002, arXiv:1311.6562 [hep-ph]

  49. [49]

    Ferretti and D

    G. Ferretti and D. Karateev,Fermionic UV completions of composite Higgs models, JHEP03(2014) 077, arXiv:1312.5330 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Serra,Beyond the minimal top partner decay, JHEP09(2015) 176, arXiv:1506.05110 [hep-ph]

    J. Serra,Beyond the minimal top partner decay, JHEP09(2015) 176, arXiv:1506.05110 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Anandakrishnan, J

    A. Anandakrishnan, J. H. Collins, M. Farina, E. Kuflik and M. Perelstein, Odd top partners at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 075009, arXiv:1506.05130 [hep-ph]

  52. [52]

    Banerjee, D

    S. Banerjee, D. Barducci, G. Bélanger and C. Delaunay, Implications of a high-mass diphoton resonance for heavy quark searches, JHEP11(2016) 154, arXiv:1606.09013 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    B. A. Dobrescu and F. Yu,Exotic Signals of Vectorlike Quarks, J. Phys.G45(2018) 08LT01, arXiv:1612.01909 [hep-ph]

  54. [54]

    Chala,Direct bounds on heavy toplike quarks with standard and exotic decays, Phys

    M. Chala,Direct bounds on heavy toplike quarks with standard and exotic decays, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 015028, arXiv:1705.03013 [hep-ph]

  55. [55]

    Colucci et al.,Top-philic vectorlike portal to scalar dark matter, Phys

    S. Colucci et al.,Top-philic vectorlike portal to scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 035002, arXiv:1804.05068 [hep-ph]

  56. [56]

    Banerjee, M

    S. Banerjee, M. Chala and M. Spannowsky,Top quark FCNCs in extended Higgs sectors, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 683, arXiv:1806.02836 [hep-ph]

  57. [57]

    Han et al.,Six top messages of new physics at the LHC, JHEP10(2019) 008, arXiv:1812.11286 [hep-ph]

    H. Han et al.,Six top messages of new physics at the LHC, JHEP10(2019) 008, arXiv:1812.11286 [hep-ph]

  58. [58]

    J. H. Kim, S. D. Lane, H.-S. Lee, I. M. Lewis and M. Sullivan, Searching for dark photons with maverick top partners, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 035041, arXiv:1904.05893 [hep-ph]

  59. [59]

    Bizot, G

    N. Bizot, G. Cacciapaglia and T. Flacke,Common exotic decays of top partners, JHEP06(2018) 065, arXiv:1803.00021 [hep-ph]. 20

  60. [60]

    Benbrik et al., Signatures of vector-like top partners decaying into new neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons, JHEP05(2020) 028, arXiv:1907.05929 [hep-ph]

    R. Benbrik et al., Signatures of vector-like top partners decaying into new neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons, JHEP05(2020) 028, arXiv:1907.05929 [hep-ph]

  61. [61]

    Banerjee, D

    A. Banerjee, D. B. Franzosi and G. Ferretti, Modelling vector-like quarks in partial compositeness framework, JHEP03(2022) 200, arXiv:2202.00037 [hep-ph]

  62. [62]

    Banerjee, V

    A. Banerjee, V. Ellajosyula and L. Panizzi, Heavy vector-like quarks decaying to exotic scalars: a case study with triplets, JHEP01(2024) 187, arXiv:2311.17877 [hep-ph]

  63. [63]

    Banerjee and G

    A. Banerjee and G. Ferretti,Vacuum misalignment in presence of four-Fermi operators, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 095006, arXiv:2302.11598 [hep-ph]

  64. [64]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, D. E. López-Fogliani and C. Muñoz, Novel signatures for vector-like quarks, JHEP06(2017) 095, arXiv:1705.02526 [hep-ph]

  65. [65]

    Cacciapaglia, T

    G. Cacciapaglia, T. Flacke, M. Park and M. Zhang, Exotic decays of top partners: mind the search gap, Phys. Lett.B798(2019) 135015, arXiv:1908.07524 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Banerjee et al.,Vector-like quarks: Status and new directions at the LHC, SciPost Phys

    A. Banerjee et al.,Vector-like quarks: Status and new directions at the LHC, SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 079, arXiv:2406.09193 [hep-ph]

  67. [67]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

  68. [68]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

  69. [69]

    Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

  70. [70]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

  71. [71]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

  72. [72]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

  73. [73]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

  74. [74]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

  75. [75]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]. 21

  76. [76]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS inner detector trigger performance in𝑝𝑝collisions at13TeV during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 206, arXiv:2107.02485 [hep-ex]

  77. [77]

    J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

  78. [78]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

  79. [79]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

  80. [80]

    Sjöstrand, S

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

Showing first 80 references.