Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Generating broadband optical squeezing via Cascaded Micro-Ring Resonators

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A short cascade of parametric microrings can make a flat broadband squeezed spectrum that acts like a Markovian reservoir with far less bandwidth than one cavity needs.

desk verdict Clean cascade theory for flat broadband squeezing; the N=5 quarter-bandwidth headline is real only for uniform pump, not the depleted-pump model the paper itself treats as realistic. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28493 v1 pith:UO5HQSTM submitted 2026-07-30 quant-ph

Chung-Hsien Wang , Tian Zhong This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords broadbandsqueezingcascadedmicroringresonatorsMarkoviansqueezedreservoirparametricamplificationintegratedphotonicsnon-Markovianityflat-toppedspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Broadband squeezed light can serve as a Markovian bath that strongly boosts light–matter coupling, but a single cavity forces a painful trade-off: deep squeezing comes with a narrow Lorentzian spectrum, while a wide spectrum needs extreme low-Q and high pump gain. This paper shows that cascading N parametric microrings on one bus waveguide multiplies the single-ring transfer function, so the output X-quadrature spectrum becomes flatter and deeper as N grows. With modest intrinsic loss and either uniform pumping or a pump strength tuned to cancel curvature under realistic geometric pump depletion, a few rings already produce a broad flat-topped plateau. That plateau approaches the ideal memoryless squeezed reservoir much faster than a single Lorentzian of equal depth: N=5 with κ_I/κ=0.1 cuts the required source-to-target bandwidth ratio to roughly a quarter near resonance. The same chain stays usable under frequency disorder and even a failed ring, and it spreads the gain across ordinary integrated resonators instead of one heroic device.

What carries the argument

The cascaded input–output map: the total transfer matrix is the ordered product T_tot = T_N … T_1 of single-ring transfers T_k = I − κ_k χ_k, so the XX squeezing spectrum is essentially |β(ω)|^{2N} plus a geometric series of intrinsic-loss noise. Raising the single-ring factor to the Nth power both deepens and flattens the dip; zero second derivative of S_XX at ω=0 then fixes the pump that keeps the plateau flat under pump depletion.

What would settle it

Build an on-chip cascade of five (or fewer) parametrically pumped microrings with measured κ_I/κ≈0.1, record the output XX spectrum under the predicted pump, and check whether the filtered non-Markovianity ratio R_N for a known target drops to ~10^{-3} at roughly one-quarter the source linewidth a single ring needs for the same depth.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Cascading parametric microring resonators on a common bus turns the multiplicative product of single-ring transfer functions into a flat-topped broadband squeezing spectrum. Under the conditions the authors identify—including a zero-curvature pump choice that survives geometric pump attenuation—that spectrum converges to a Markovian squeezed reservoir far faster than a single-cavity Lorentzian of the same resonant depth, so N≈5 already quarters the bandwidth a lone cavity would need.

Load-bearing premise

The headline quarter-bandwidth claim is calculated for uniform pump strength across the rings; under real geometric pump depletion a flat plateau only exists up to a maximum N set by the loss ratio, and the advertised N=5 point sits at that edge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Squeezed Markovian reservoirs become practical on existing integrated platforms without extreme low-Q, high-gain single cavities.
  • The same cascade architecture applies to bulk OPOs, superconducting parametric cavities, and on-chip platforms beyond silicon nitride (lithium niobate, SiC).
  • Fabrication disorder and occasional ring failure cost only tenths of a dB, so active frequency locking can be lighter than for precision single resonators.
  • Target systems that need flat squeezing over their linewidth (cluster-state multiplexing, decay suppression, ultrastrong-coupling protocols) can be driven by shorter, moderately pumped chains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the flatness bound N ≲ ½(κ_I/κ + κ/κ_I) is tight at the abstract’s operating point, experiments will likely need either mild pump re-amplification between stages or slightly higher loss ratios than 0.1 to keep margin.
  • The multiplicative transfer picture suggests that non-identical per-ring gains or deliberate tapering could sculpt non-flat spectra on demand (e.g., matched filters), an extension the paper does not explore.
  • If the XX-only coupling assumption holds for the intended targets, the unused Y and cross spectra are free resources for dual-quadrature or two-mode protocols on the same chip.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a cascade of parametrically pumped microring resonators on a common bus waveguide as a source of broadband squeezed vacuum suitable for use as a Markovian reservoir. Using the SLH formalism and Heisenberg–Langevin equations, the authors derive a closed-form output squeezing spectrum (Eqs. 1–8), including geometric intracavity pump attenuation (Eq. 9). They identify a zero-curvature pump condition that restores a locally flat XX spectrum, show robustness to frequency disorder and broken rings (Fig. 3), and quantify approach to the Markovian limit via a non-Markovianity ratio R_N built from the target-filtered response (Sec. IV, Fig. 4). The central quantitative claim is that N=5 rings at κ_I/κ=0.1 cut the source bandwidth needed for a given R_N to roughly a quarter of a single Lorentzian cavity.

Significance. If the bandwidth-reduction claim holds under the same pump model the authors treat as realistic, the work offers a concrete, platform-ready route to engineered squeezed reservoirs on integrated photonics, relaxing the simultaneous low-Q and high-gain demands of single broadband cavities. The transfer-matrix spectrum, geometric pump model, zero-curvature design rule, and disorder averages are standard and internally consistent; the use of an external non-Markovianity measure (Ali et al.) rather than an ad-hoc figure of merit is a methodological strength. The architecture maps onto existing CROW and parametric-microring technology, so the result would be of direct interest to continuous-variable and cavity-QED communities.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. IV; Fig. 4; Eq. (8)–(9)] The headline claim (abstract; end of Sec. I; Sec. IV) that N=5 at κ_I/κ=0.1 reduces required bandwidth to a quarter of a single cavity is obtained solely from the uniform-pump spectrum Eq. (8) and its analytic continuation in N (Fig. 4). Section IV never recomputes R_N on any depleted-pump or zero-curvature spectrum. Under the geometric attenuation the authors themselves adopt as realistic (Eq. 9), the plateau becomes a central dip unless ξ is tuned to vanishing curvature; that flatness window is only guaranteed for N≲½(κ_I/κ+κ/κ_I)≈5 at κ_I/κ=0.1, so the advertised operating point sits at the existence boundary. The load-bearing bandwidth-reduction number is therefore unsupported once the realistic pump model is restored. Either recompute Fig. 4 / R_N for zero-curvature depleted-pump spectra at the abstract’s parameters, or clearly restrict the quarter-bandwidth claim to the uniform-pum
  2. [Sec. IV; Fig. 4; Abstract] Figure 4 and the surrounding text fix κ_I/κ=0.2 and ξ/κ=0.1, whereas the abstract and the N≲5 bound use κ_I/κ=0.1. Because both the asymptotic plateau depth (κ_I/(κ_I+2ξ)) and the zero-curvature existence bound depend on this ratio, the factor-of-four reduction quoted for κ_I/κ=0.1 is not the quantity plotted. Align the loss ratio used in the Markovianity scan with the abstract, or report R_N for both values so the reader can verify the claimed scaling.
  3. [Sec. III; Fig. 2(c); Sec. IV] The zero-curvature condition d²[S_out]XX/dω²|ω=0=0 is presented as the design rule that yields a ‘broad, flat-topped’ spectrum useful as a Markovian reservoir (Sec. III). Vanishing quadratic curvature guarantees local flatness near ω=0 but does not by itself specify the bandwidth over which |S_mem| remains negligible across a target Lorentzian of width κ_s. A short quantitative check—e.g., the ω-interval on which |[S_out]XX−S_ml|/S_ml stays below a fixed tolerance for the N=4, ξ≈0.068κ example of Fig. 2(c), and the corresponding R_N—would make the link between the design rule and the Markovianity metric load-bearing rather than heuristic.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: ‘to achieve same squeezing’ is imprecise; the body claim is equal Markovianity (equal R_N) at equal resonant squeezing depth. Align wording.
  2. [Sec. I; Sec. IV] Sec. I and elsewhere: minor grammar (‘We develops’, ‘We then analyzes’, ‘have a experimental advantage’). A proofread pass would help.
  3. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2(c): state explicitly whether the plotted curves include geometric attenuation (Eq. 9) or only the optimized uniform-ξ limit; the caption says ‘depleted-pump’ but the comparison to ‘a single ring without additional pump power’ is easy to misread.
  4. [Sec. III; Eq. (10)] Eq. (10): the weak-drive derivation of the N bound is only sketched; a short appendix step or reference to the polynomial would aid reproducibility.
  5. [Fig. 4] Fig. 4: analytic continuation of N to non-integer values is fine for visualization but should be flagged in the caption so readers do not treat intermediate-N contours as physical devices.
  6. [References] References: a few arXiv-only or very recent items (e.g. Ren et al. 2026) may need updating at proof stage; no missing core citations noted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: spectra and Markovianity metric follow from stated Langevin/SLH equations and an external non-Markovianity definition; parameters are scanned, not fitted or self-defined.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained theory. The cascaded output spectrum (Eq. 7, and the uniform-pump reduction Eq. 8) is obtained from the SLH Hamiltonian/loss operators and the Heisenberg–Langevin equations (Sec. II), with vacuum input covariances; nothing in that algebra is defined in terms of the later R_N claim. Pump attenuation (Eq. 9) is derived from semiclassical input–output iteration, and the zero-curvature flatness condition is an imposed design rule on that spectrum, not a quantity fitted to the target result. The non-Markovianity ratio R_N (Eq. 12) is taken from the external definition of Ali et al. (2015) and applied to the analytically continued spectrum; design ratios (κ_I/κ, ξ/κ, N, κ/κ_s) are chosen and scanned, not calibrated against data so as to force the quarter-bandwidth number. Self-citations (e.g. Zhong on related cavity protocols) are peripheral and not load-bearing for the cascade spectrum or the R_N scaling. The uniform-pump vs. depleted-pump gap flagged by the skeptic is a scope/support issue for the abstract’s N=5 claim, not a by-construction reduction of outputs to inputs. No self-definitional loop, fitted-as-prediction step, uniqueness import, or renamed empirical pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard input–output quantum optics plus several domain modeling choices (geometric pump depletion, XX-only target coupling, a particular non-Markovianity ratio). No new particles or forces. Free parameters are design knobs (loss ratio, pump, N, disorder width) that set the numerical ‘quarter bandwidth’ headline; they are not fits to external data but the quantitative claim depends on their chosen values.

free parameters (4)
  • κ_I/κ (intrinsic-to-bus loss ratio) = 0.1 (abstract/N=5 claim); 0.2 (Fig. 4)
    Sets asymptotic squeeze floor and the N bound for zero-curvature flatness under depletion; abstract uses 0.1, Fig. 4 uses 0.2—headline bandwidth factor depends on this choice.
  • ξ/κ (normalized parametric pump) = ~0.068κ–0.1κ in figures
    Chosen by hand for plots and tuned near zero-curvature (e.g. ξ≈0.068κ for N=4) to flatten depleted-pump spectra; not derived from a uniqueness principle.
  • N (cascade length) and R_N threshold = N=5; R_N=10^{-3}
    N=5 and R_N=10^{-3} define the ‘quarter bandwidth’ statement; continuous-N continuation is used for maps.
  • Δδ (frequency disorder width) = 0.1κ in Fig. 3
    Ensemble std for robustness plots (e.g. 0.1κ); illustrates tolerance rather than a measured fab distribution.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption SLH series product gives the cascaded Hamiltonian and single collapse operator L_tot=∑√κ_k a_k for unidirectional bus coupling.
    Sec. II, Eqs. (1)–(2); standard but assumes ideal chiral/feed-forward bus with no back-reflections or non-Markovian waveguide delay.
  • domain assumption Intracavity pump (SFWM pair rate) depletes geometrically as ξ_k=((κ-κ_I)/(κ+κ_I))^{2k-2} ξ from semiclassical steady-state input–output on the pump modes.
    Sec. III, Eq. (9); neglects pump quantum noise, undepleted-signal back-action, and non-identical pump/signal loss.
  • domain assumption Downstream target dynamics depend only on the XX spectrum of a stationary Gaussian drive (linear dipole coupling).
    Sec. II citing [30–32]; drops Y and XY information and nonlinear system–bath terms.
  • domain assumption Non-Markovianity is quantified by the L1 ratio R_N=∥R_mem∥_1/∥R_ml∥_1 of memory vs memoryless parts of the target response (Ali et al.).
    Sec. IV, Eq. (12); other measures could rank spectra differently.
  • standard math Single-ring stability ξ<Γ/2 and vacuum inputs for bus and intrinsic baths.
    Sec. III; standard parametric-amplifier stability and quantum optical noise model.
  • ad hoc to paper Zero curvature d²[S_out]_{XX}/dω²|_{ω=0}=0 is a sufficient design rule for a ‘broad, locally flat’ plateau useful as a Markovian reservoir.
    Sec. III; removes quadratic variation but does not by itself fix a bandwidth interval or guarantee R_N performance under depletion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generating broadband optical squeezing via Cascaded Micro-Ring Resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UO5HQSTM

@misc{pith2026260728493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generating broadband optical squeezing via Cascaded Micro-Ring Resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UO5HQSTM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28493}
}
abstract

Broadband squeezed light functioning as a Markovian reservoir can exponentially enhance light-matter interactions, benefiting quantum technologies. However, conventional single-cavity sources face a trade-off between squeezing depth and spectral bandwidth. We propose a scalable scheme for generating broadband squeezed vacuum using a cascade of parametric microring resonators coupled to a common bus waveguide. By analyzing the output, we identify the specific conditions that yield a broad, flat-topped squeezing spectrum, even under realistic intracavity pump attenuation. We demonstrate that this architecture is robust against fabrication imperfections, including inhomogeneous resonator frequencies and component failures. We show that the flat-topped spectrum converges to the Markovian limit significantly faster than a single-cavity Lorentzian profile. An array of as few as $N=5$ coupled resonators with an intrinsic loss ratio of $\kappa_I/\kappa = 0.1$ reduces the required bandwidth to a quarter of that needed by a single cavity to achieve same squeezing. This rapid convergence relaxes the low-$Q$ and high-gain constraints of single broadband cavities, distributing the squeezing process across moderately pumped resonators to provide a practical route for engineering squeezed reservoirs on mature integrated photonic platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28493 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic plot of the cascaded ring-resonator architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Output [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Cascaded source against fabrication disorder and broken [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Color map of the ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references

  1. [1]

    J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott,et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detec- tor by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics7, 613 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Acerneseet al.(Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the astro- physical reach of the advanced virgo detector via the applica- tion of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the astro- physical reach of the advanced virgo detector via the applica- tion of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 231108 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, F. Rortais, T. Vincent, J. F. F. Bulmer, F. M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, M. J. Collins,et al., Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor, nature606, 75 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Krauter, C

    H. Krauter, C. A. Muschik, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, J. M. Pe- tersen, J. I. Cirac, and E. S. Polzik, Entanglement generated by dissipation and steady state entanglement of two macroscopic objects, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 080503 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    K. W. Murch, S. J. Weber, C. Macklin, and I. Siddiqi, Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit, Nature502, 211 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kron- wald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Science349, 952 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    M. V . Larsen, X. Guo, K. Breum, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state, Science366, 369 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    K. W. Murch, S. J. Weber, K. M. Beck, E. Ginossar, and I. Sid- diqi, Reduction of the radiative decay of atomic coherence in squeezed vacuum, Nature499, 62 (2013)

    2013

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, De- tection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110801 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    V . D. Vaidya, B. Morrison, L. Helt, R. Shahrokshahi, D. H. Mahler, M. J. Collins, K. Tan, J. Lavoie, A. Repingon, M. Menotti,et al., Broadband quadrature-squeezed vacuum and nonclassical photon number correlations from a nanophotonic device, Science Advances6, eaba9186 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    T. J. Steiner, J. E. Castro, L. Chang, Q. Dang, W. Xie, J. Nor- man, J. E. Bowers, and G. Moody, Ultrabright entangled- photon-pair generation from anAlGaAs-on-insulator micror- ing resonator, PRX Quantum2, 010337 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Z. Yang, R. Zhang, Z. Wang, P. Xu, W. Zhang, Z. Kang, J. Zheng, S. Dai, R. Wang, and A. Majumdar, High-q, submicron-confined chalcogenide microring resonators, Opt. Express29, 33225 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    A. Dutt, K. Luke, S. Manipatruni, A. L. Gaeta, P. Nussenzveig, and M. Lipson, On-chip optical squeezing, Phys. Rev. Appl.3, 044005 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Kashiwazaki, N

    T. Kashiwazaki, N. Takanashi, T. Yamashima, T. Kazama, K. Enbutsu, R. Kasahara, T. Umeki, and A. Furusawa, Continuous-wave 6-db-squeezed light with 2.5-thz-bandwidth from single-mode ppln waveguide, APL Photonics5, 036104 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Ledezma, R

    L. Ledezma, R. Sekine, Q. Guo, R. Nehra, S. Jahani, and A. Marandi, Intense optical parametric amplification in dispersion-engineered nanophotonic lithium niobate waveg- uides, Optica9, 303 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    T. K. L ˆe, D. M. Lukin, C. Roques-Carmes, A. Karnieli, E. Lustig, M. A. Guidry, S. Fan, and J. Vuˇckovi´c, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics in a finite-bandwidth squeezed reservoir, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 034053 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Leroux, L

    C. Leroux, L. C. G. Govia, and A. A. Clerk, Enhancing cav- ity quantum electrodynamics via antisqueezing: Synthetic ul- trastrong coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 093602 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, P.-B. Li, X.-Y . L ¨u, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Exponentially enhanced light-matter interaction, coop- erativities, and steady-state entanglement using parametric am- plification, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 093601 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Lemonde, N

    M.-A. Lemonde, N. Didier, and A. A. Clerk, Enhanced non- linear interactions in quantum optomechanics via mechanical amplification, Nature Communications7, 11338 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Y .-H. Chen, W. Qin, R. Stassi, X. Wang, and F. Nori, Fast binomial-code holonomic quantum computation with ultra- strong light-matter coupling, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033275 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    H.-K. Lau, H. Qiao, A. A. Clerk, and T. Zhong, Efficient in situ generation of photon-memory entanglement in a nonlinear cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053602 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    H. Choi, D. Zhu, Y . Yoon, and D. Englund, Cascaded cavities boost the indistinguishability of imperfect quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 183602 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    A. Li, Y . Zhou, and X.-B. Wang, Cascaded Kerr photon- blockade sources and applications in quantum key distribution, Scientific Reports7, 7309 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Cao, J.-k

    R.-t. Cao, J.-k. Xie, Y .-l. Ren, S.-y. Gao, and S.-l. Ma, Direc- tional emission of a broadband squeezed microwave field, Phys. 8 Rev. A111, 023701 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    D. Wang, Y . Zhang, and M. Xiao, Quantum limits for cascaded optical parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. A87, 023834 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    N ´emet and S

    N. N ´emet and S. Parkins, Enhanced optical squeezing from a degenerate parametric amplifier via time-delayed coherent feedback, Phys. Rev. A94, 023809 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Team, A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing, Nature641, 876 (2025)

    P. Team, A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing, Nature641, 876 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Gough and M

    J. Gough and M. R. James, The series product and its appli- cation to quantum feedforward and feedback networks, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control54, 2530 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    Combes, J

    J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The slh frame- work for modeling quantum input-output networks, Advances in Physics: X2, 784 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Zhang, N

    C. Zhang, N. Lambert, X.-Q. Li, M. Cirio, and P. Liang, Puri- fied pseudomode model for nonlinear system-bath interactions, Phys. Rev. B112, 115131 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    S. Luo, N. Lambert, P. Liang, and M. Cirio, Quantum-classical decomposition of gaussian quantum environments: A stochas- tic pseudomode model, PRX Quantum4, 030316 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Tamascelli, A

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Nonperturbative treatment of non-markovian dynamics of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 030402 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    H. Zhao, P. Miao, M. H. Teimourpour, S. Malzard, R. El- Ganainy, H. Schomerus, and L. Feng, Topological hybrid sil- icon microlasers, Nature Communications9, 1 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    X. Qiao, B. Midya, Z. Gao, Z. Zhang, H. Zhao, T. Wu, J. Yim, R. Agarwal, N. M. Litchinitser, and L. Feng, Higher- dimensional supersymmetric microlaser arrays, Science372, 403 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    A. Dutt, M. Minkov, Q. Lin, L. Yuan, D. A. Miller, and S. Fan, Experimental band structure spectroscopy along a synthetic di- mension, Nature Communications10, 3122 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Zeng, Z.-A

    X.-D. Zeng, Z.-A. Wang, J.-M. Ren, Y .-T. Wang, C. Ao, W. Liu, N.-J. Guo, L.-K. Xie, J.-Y . Liu, Y .-H. Ma, Y .-Q. Wu, S. Wang, P.-Y . Li, M. Yang, J.-S. Xu, X.-W. Luo, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, A hybrid-frequency programmable synthetic- dimension simulator with ric...

    2026

  29. [37]

    G. Li, L. Hu, Z. Lin, S. Wang, Y . Dong, S. Fan, and J. Chen, Dynamic band structure measurement in the synthetic space, Science Advances7, eabe4335 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Bal ˇcytis, T

    A. Bal ˇcytis, T. Ozawa, Y . Ota, S. Iwamoto, S. Fan, and T. Baba, Synthetic dimension band structures on a si cmos photonic plat- form, Science Advances8, eabk0468 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Z. Wan, Q. Cen, Y . Ding, S. Tao, C. Zeng, J. Xia, K. Xu, Y . Dai, and M. Li, Virtual-state model for analyzing electro- optical modulation in ring resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 123802 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    L. Yuan, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, Synthetic frequency dimensions in dynamically modulated ring resonators, APL Photonics6, 071102 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Chen, W.-X

    N. Chen, W.-X. Li, Y .-R. Fan, H.-H. Li, H. Zeng, W.-Q. Chi, H. Zhou, H. Li, L.-X. You, G.-C. Guo, Q. Zhou, J. Xu, and X.-L. Zhang, Quantum light sources with configurable lifetime leveraging parity-time symmetry, Nature Communications16, 10669 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. M. Silver, L. D. Bino, F. Copie, M. Woodley, G. Ghalanos, A. Ø. Svela, and P. Del’Haye, Sub-milliwatt-level microresonator solitons with extended access range using an auxiliary laser, Optica6, 206 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    M. M. Ali, P.-Y . Lo, M. W.-Y . Tu, and W.-M. Zhang, Non- markovianity measure using two-time correlation functions, Phys. Rev. A92, 062306 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Takanashi, W

    N. Takanashi, W. Inokuchi, T. Serikawa, and A. Furusawa, Gen- eration and measurement of a squeezed vacuum up to 100 mhz at 1550 nm with a semi-monolithic optical parametric oscilla- tor designed towards direct coupling with waveguide modules, Opt. Express27, 18900 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    A. D. Sanchez, S. C. Kumar, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, Quadratic frequency comb based on phase-modulated cw-driven optical parametric oscillator with intracavity dispersion control, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023110 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    McCuller, C

    L. McCuller, C. Whittle, D. Ganapathy, K. Komori, M. Tse, A. Fernandez-Galiana, L. Barsotti, P. Fritschel, M. MacInnis, F. Matichard, K. Mason, N. Mavalvala, R. Mittleman, H. Yu, M. E. Zucker, and M. Evans, Frequency-dependent squeezing for advanced ligo, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, ...

    2020

  39. [47]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Iyama, T

    D. Iyama, T. Kamiya, S. Fujii, H. Mukai, Y . Zhou, T. Nagase, A. Tomonaga, R. Wang, J.-J. Xue, S. Watabe, S. Kwon, and J.- S. Tsai, Observation and manipulation of quantum interference in a superconducting kerr parametric oscillator, Nature Com- munications15, 86 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Zhong, E

    L. Zhong, E. P. Menzel, R. Di Candia, P. Eder, M. Ihmig, A. Baust, M. Haeberlein, E. Hoffmann, K. Inomata, T. Ya- mamoto, Y . Nakamura, E. Solano, F. Deppe, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Squeezing with a flux-driven josephson parametric amplifier, New Journal of Physics15, 125013 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, S. Leger, D. Fraudet, V . Jouanny, O. Buisson, W. Guichard, C. Naud, J. Aumentado, F. Lecocq, and N. Roch, Observation of two-mode squeezing in a traveling wave parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 153603 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Kashiwazaki, T

    T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, K. Enbutsu, T. Kazama, A. In- oue, K. Fukui, M. Endo, T. Umeki, and A. Furusawa, Over- 8-db squeezed light generation by a broadband waveguide op- tical parametric amplifier toward fault-tolerant ultra-fast quan- tum computers, Applied Physics Let...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Jankowski, N

    M. Jankowski, N. Jornod, C. Langrock, B. Desiatov, A. Marandi, M. Lon ˇcar, and M. M. Fejer, Quasi-static optical parametric amplification, Optica9, 273 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    X. Ren, R. Kopparapu, T. S. Karnik, C.-H. Lee, K. Kwon, C. Cheung, Y . Yu, S.-Y . Ma, B.-H. Wu, R. Yin, L. Zhou, Q. Zhuang, D. Englund, Z. Chen, and M. Yu, Quantum squeez- ing in an all-resonant periodically poled lithium niobate mi- croresonator (2026), arXiv:2602.22693

    2026

  46. [54]

    Y . Song, Z. Li, X. Zhu, N. Lippok, M. Erkintalo, and M. Lonˇcar, High-efficiency and broadband kerr comb generation in normal- dispersion x-cut lithium niobate microresonators, Science Ad- vances12, eaeb5758 (2026)

    2026

  47. [55]

    P.-Y . Wang, S. Wan, R. Ma, W. Li, F. Bo, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Octave soliton microcombs in lithium niobate microres- onators, Opt. Lett.49, 1729 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    J. Lu, J. B. Surya, X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, Z. Gong, Y . Xu, and H. X. Tang, Periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate micror- ing resonators with a second-harmonic generation efficiency of 250,000%/w, Optica6, 1455 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    C. Wang, Z. Fang, A. Yi, B. Yang, Z. Wang, L. Zhou, C. Shen, Y . Zhu, Y . Zhou, R. Bao, Z. Li, Y . Chen, K. Huang, J. Zhang, Y . Cheng, and X. Ou, High-q microresonators on 4h-silicon- carbide-on-insulator platform for nonlinear photonics, Light: Science & Applications10, 139 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    M. A. Guidry, K. Y . Yang, D. M. Lukin, A. Markosyan, J. Yang, M. M. Fejer, and J. Vuˇckovi´c, Optical parametric oscillation in 9 silicon carbide nanophotonics, Optica7, 1139 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    T. Fan, H. Moradinejad, X. Wu, A. A. Eftekhar, and A. Adibi, High-q integrated photonic microresonators on 3c-sic-on- insulator (sicoi) platform, Opt. Express26, 25814 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Yariv, Y

    A. Yariv, Y . Xu, R. K. Lee, and A. Scherer, Coupled-resonator optical waveguide:?a proposal and analysis, Opt. Lett.24, 711 (1999)

    1999

  53. [61]

    J. K. S. Poon, J. Scheuer, S. Mookherjea, G. T. Paloczi, Y . Huang, and A. Yariv, Matrix analysis of microring coupled- resonator optical waveguides, Opt. Express12, 90 (2004)

    2004

  54. [62]

    M. Y . Nada, M. A. K. Othman, and F. Capolino, Theory of cou- pled resonator optical waveguides exhibiting high-order excep- tional points of degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B96, 184304 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    M. L. Cooper, G. Gupta, M. A. Schneider, W. M. J. Green, S. Assefa, F. Xia, D. K. Gifford, and S. Mookherjea, Waveguide dispersion effects in silicon-on-insulator coupled-resonator op- tical waveguides, Opt. Lett.35, 3030 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    Jayatilleka, H

    H. Jayatilleka, H. Shoman, L. Chrostowski, and S. Shekhar, Photoconductive heaters enable control of large-scale silicon photonic ring resonator circuits, Optica6, 84 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.