Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 40 references

Knudsen-Controlled Switching of Thermal Conductivity Response by Targeted Phonon Excitation

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the sign of the thermal-conductivity response to targeted phonon excitation is set by a Knudsen-controlled competition between added transport weight and enhanced intrinsic scattering, and that this sign reverses

desk verdict The ω_t–Knudsen sign-switching map is a real contribution, but the frozen-population assumption needs testing before taking it to the lab. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28905 v1 pith:7LVWNBVO submitted 2026-07-31 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords thermalconductivityphononexcitationKnudsennumbernanofilmtransportthree-phononscatteringMonteCarlosimulationactivecontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Targeted phonon excitation—pumping a narrow frequency band of phonons—can either raise or lower a material's thermal conductivity. This paper establishes a general principle that decides which: a Knudsen-controlled competition. In bulk material (Kn≪1), the pumped phonons mostly amplify intrinsic scattering, so conductivity drops. In thin films (Kn≥1), low-frequency pumping adds transport weight to quasi-ballistic long-mean-free-path modes and conductivity rises, while high-frequency pumping stays suppressive. The authors derive this sign rule from first-principles three-phonon rates plus Monte Carlo transport for Ge, Si, and 3C-SiC, and show all three collapse onto one frequency–Knudsen map.

What carries the argument

The Reduced Spectral Transport Model (RSTM) condenses the physics into the per-channel response R(ω;Kn,ωt) = [1+α]·(1+Kn·ℓ0/⟨ℓ0⟩)/(1+β+Kn·ℓ0/⟨ℓ0⟩) − 1, where α is the excitation-induced relative increase in modal transport weight and β the relative increase in three-phonon scattering rate; intrinsic and boundary scattering combine via Matthiessen's rule. The Knudsen number appears in the (1+Kn·ℓ0/⟨ℓ0⟩) factors, making boundary scattering dilute the impact of β for long-MFP modes, which is the mechanism that turns the sign. The paper couples this model with phonon-tracking Monte Carlo simulations driven by first-principles three-phonon rates with modified Bose occupation factors.

What would settle it

Measure the thermal conductivity of a 100-nm Si film at 300 K under pump frequencies near 1.2 THz and near 10 THz at equal injected energy density; the theory predicts a positive response for the low-frequency pump and a negative one for the high-frequency pump. Observing suppression in both cases—or no sign reversal when sweeping frequency at fixed Kn—would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that geometric confinement, quantified by the Knudsen number Kn=⟨ℓ0⟩/H, reverses the sign of the relative thermal-conductivity change (κ−κ0)/κ0 under spectrally selective phonon excitation. Exciting low-frequency phonons in a nanofilm (Kn≥1) increases the transport weight of long-mean-free-path modes that remain quasi-ballistic, producing positive response up to +20% for 3C-SiC at 100 nm; exciting high-frequency phonons or working in bulk (Kn≪1) gives predominantly negative response because enhanced three-phonon scattering shortens lifetimes. The sign-switching is organized in a universal (ωt/ωD, Kn) phase map, and a reduced spectral transport model with Eq. (8)

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on the assumption that a narrow, steady Gaussian phonon population excess (Eq. 11) can be maintained while heat current is probed, with only three-phonon Bose occupation factors modified; if real excitation sources cause strong temperature redistribution, higher-order scattering, or electron/phonon coupling, the sign-switching map may not be observable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In films with thickness near the average intrinsic mean free path, low-frequency excitation produces the largest enhancement—up to about +20% in 3C-SiC at 100 nm and 300 K.
  • High-frequency excitation is predominantly suppressive across confinement regimes, approaching roughly −30% in the bulk limit for Ge and Si.
  • The response map in the (ωt/ωD, Kn) plane is common to Ge, Si, and 3C-SiC, meaning the sign rule transfers across materials with very different phonon spectra.
  • Sweeping either the pump frequency or the film thickness across the predicted crossover should reverse the sign of the thermal-conductivity response—a direct, testable prediction.
  • The RSTM shows that the total response is the conductivity-weighted integral over all spectral channels, so the sign is set by the full spectrum, not by the excited mode alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The frozen-Gaussian population ansatz (Eq. 11) suggests the mechanism is not tied to a specific excitation pathway; any source that maintains a narrow spectral hole—optical, terahertz, or polariton-mediated—should produce the same map, so the prediction may extend to pump sources beyond those cited.
  • A sharper test than bulk-vs-film alone: the crossover frequency ωt/ωD at which response changes sign should increase with Kn (thinner films push the positive window to higher normalized frequencies); mapping this shift would confirm the Knudsen mechanism against simple MFP shortening.
  • Because the model omits temperature redistribution and higher-order scattering, the predicted enhancement is most likely to appear in time-resolved or transient measurements where local heating has not yet built up; steady-state experiments may see a muted version.
  • The common topology implies a design rule for active phononic switches: choose a material with a high Debye frequency (like SiC) to widen the enhancement window in normalized units, and tune thickness to sit at the intermediate-Kn peak.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the sign of the thermal-conductivity response to targeted phonon excitation is controlled by a Knudsen-number-dependent competition between increased transport weight of long-mean-free-path phonons and excitation-enhanced intrinsic three-phonon scattering. It uses DFT plus ShengBTE three-phonon rates and phonon-tracking Monte Carlo simulations for Ge, Si, and 3C–SiC in bulk and nanofilm geometries. The central finding is that bulk systems are predominantly suppressed, while 100-nm films show a positive response under low-frequency excitation and a negative response under high-frequency excitation. The results are organized in a (ω_t/ω_D, Kn) phase diagram, and a reduced spectral transport model (RSTM) is introduced to explain the common topology. The calculation prescribes a frozen Gaussian population excess (Eq. 11) and recomputes the scattering rates with modified Bose factors (Eqs. 15–16).

Significance. If the sign reversal is robust, the paper offers a generic design principle for active thermal switching that combines spectral selectivity with geometric confinement. A clear strength is that the first-principles Monte Carlo maps in Figs. 4(a)–4(c) are independent of the RSTM, so the core sign reversal is not an artifact of fitting the reduced model. The RSTM transparently identifies the physical competition and explains why an intermediate Knudsen regime should maximize enhancement. However, the practical relevance of the central claim depends on whether the prescribed population can actually be sustained under realistic driving, and the paper provides neither a self-consistent pump model nor numerical uncertainty estimates. The significance is therefore conditional on closing this gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (11); Discussion] The frozen-profile approximation fixes the Gaussian excess α while Eqs. (15)–(16) compute an enhanced scattering rate β. In a real experiment with a constant pump, the steady-state excess of the target modes would scale roughly as α_ss ∝ α0/(1+β), so the same modes that provide the positive transport weight are also the ones whose population excess is depleted by the scattering the model computes. This could reduce or even eliminate the positive (κ−κ0)/κ0 values in Figs. 2(d)–2(f) and shrink the enhancement regions in Figs. 4(a)–4(c). The Discussion acknowledges that excitation powers and dynamics are not modeled, but this is load-bearing for the central claim. The authors should either (i) test a constant-power approximation, e.g., α_ss = α0/(1+β), and show whether the sign map survives, or (ii) explicitly restrict the claim to a prescribed maintained population and state what frequency
  2. [Results, Figs. 2–4] No statistical error bars, convergence checks, or q-grid sensitivity are reported for the Monte Carlo results. Because the reported enhancements are as small as +5–10% for Ge and Si, the crossover boundaries in Figs. 4(a)–4(c) could shift or even disappear within numerical uncertainty. The authors should report the statistical uncertainty of the MC estimates and at least one convergence test (e.g., number of trajectories, q-grid density, or film-boundary sampling) to support the quantitative positioning of the sign-switching map.
  3. [RSTM, Eq. (9); SI Sec. S5] The RSTM map in Fig. 4(d) is central to the claim of a common response topology, but the dimensionless spectral functions and parameter values are only stated to be in SI Appendix Sec. S5, which is not available in the main text. This makes the key model non-reproducible. The authors should either provide the explicit functions and values in the main text or make the SI available, and include a brief sensitivity analysis showing that the topology in Fig. 4(d) is not an artifact of a particular parameter choice.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (14)] The quantity ΔE is called 'injected energy density', but it is actually the excess energy density of the driven state relative to equilibrium. This naming could be confused with absorbed pump energy per unit volume; consider renaming it to 'excess energy density of the prescribed state'.
  2. [Fig. 3] The caption states vertical dashed lines mark ⟨ℓ0⟩ and ℓ_max, but the main text says 'vertical dashed lines mark the average intrinsic mean free path ⟨ℓ0⟩ and maximum intrinsic mean free path ℓ_max'. Please ensure the notation is consistent and that the reader knows which line corresponds to which quantity.
  3. [Introduction, Refs. [26]–[28]] The discussion of previous predictions is brief. Given that the positive response in nanofilms is the paper's main novelty, a slightly more detailed comparison to Refs. [26]–[28] (especially the assumptions made there about the nonthermal population) would help the reader understand what is new.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the first-principles MC maps are self-contained, and the RSTM is a transparent, independently stated model rather than a fitted restatement of the result.

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on first-principles three-phonon scattering rates plus phonon-tracking Monte Carlo simulations (Eqs. 10–20), which are not derived from the RSTM or from any target result. The prescribed Gaussian population excess (Eq. 11) with amplitude set by injected energy density (Eq. 14) is a stated modeling assumption, not a fitted parameter; the excitation-modified scattering rates and lifetimes (Eqs. 15–16) and transport weights (Eq. 17) are then computed self-consistently from that assumption. The resulting sign of (κ−κ0)/κ0 is a genuine output of the simulation, and the paper reports both negative (bulk/high-frequency) and positive (confined/low-frequency) responses across materials, so the phenomenon is not forced by the equations alone. The RSTM (Eqs. 3–9) is presented as a separate conceptual model with generic spectral functions specified in SI S5 and explicitly stated not to be fitted to Ge, Si, or 3C–SiC; while the full SI specification is not in main text, the MC maps in Figs. 4(a)–4(c) are independent of the RSTM, so the common-topology claim does not reduce to a self-constructed fit. Self-citations to prior targeted-excitation studies (Refs. 27, 28) are motivational and not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those works in a way that forces the present conclusion. The Discussion candidly limits the framework to a prescribed quasisteady population and notes that coupling to electrons/photons, higher-order scattering, temperature redistribution, and excitation powers are not predicted; these are acknowledged physical limitations, not circular derivations. No specific step in the derivation chain reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the Gaussian population excess is a model input, not a new object. The main hidden cost is the set of RSTM spectral functions/parameters in SI Sec S5, which are essential for the claimed general-principle support.

free parameters (3)
  • RSTM dimensionless spectral functions and parameters (D(ω), v_x(ω), ℓ0(ω), α, β) = not shown (SI Sec S5)
    Used to generate Fig. 4(d); if these shapes/amplitudes were selected to match the MC maps, the RSTM's claim of generality is weakened.
  • Gaussian excitation FWHM = 0.2 THz (Eq. 12)
    Chosen spectral selectivity; affects which modes are populated but not a fit to the response.
  • Injected energy densities ΔE1–ΔE3 = 5e6, 1e7, 2e7 J/m³
    Chosen excitation amplitudes; control magnitude but not sign.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Independent relaxation channels combined via Matthiessen's rule for intrinsic and boundary scattering (RSTM Eq. 7; MC uses trajectories).
    Assumes boundary and intrinsic scattering are uncorrelated.
  • domain assumption Quasisteady frozen nonequilibrium population; weak probing temperature gradient; linear response around driven state.
    Stated in Methods; if the population relaxes during measurement, κ is ill-defined.
  • domain assumption Three-phonon scattering is the dominant intrinsic process; isotope, electron, 4-phonon effects neglected.
    ShengBTE computes only three-phonon rates; Discussion acknowledges higher-order scattering under strong excitation.
  • domain assumption DFT (Quantum ESPRESSO) and ShengBTE phonon properties are quantitatively accurate for Ge, Si, 3C-SiC.
    No convergence or validation data shown in main text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Knudsen-Controlled Switching of Thermal Conductivity Response by Targeted Phonon Excitation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7LVWNBVO

@misc{pith2026260728905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Knudsen-Controlled Switching of Thermal Conductivity Response by Targeted Phonon Excitation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7LVWNBVO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28905}
}
abstract

Targeted phonon excitation offers a route to dynamically control heat conduction, yet no general principle predicts whether a spectrally selective nonequilibrium phonon population will enhance or suppress thermal transport. A Knudsen-controlled competition between the increased contribution of long-mean-free-path phonons and excitation-enhanced intrinsic scattering governs the sign of the thermal-conductivity response. First-principles three-phonon scattering rates combined with phonon-tracking Monte Carlo simulations are used to examine Ge, Si, and 3C--SiC from bulk crystals to confined nanofilms. In bulk systems, excitation-enhanced scattering dominates and thermal conductivity is predominantly suppressed. In nanofilms, by contrast, low-frequency excitation can increase the contribution of quasi-ballistic heat-carrying channels and enhance thermal conductivity, whereas higher-frequency excitation is predominantly suppressive. At fixed background temperature and excitation strength, these opposite responses are organized in a frequency--Knudsen map based on the normalized target frequency, $\omega_{\mathrm t}/\omega_{\mathrm D}$, and the Knudsen number, $\mathrm{Kn}$. The resulting framework provides a general physical basis for controlling nonequilibrium heat transport beyond static phonon engineering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28905 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W.-Y. Woon, A. Kasperovich, J.-R. Wen, K. K. Hu, M. Malakoutian, J.-H. Jhang, S. Vaziri, I. Datye, C. C. Shih, J. F. Hsu, X. Y. Bao, Y. Wu, M. Nomura, S. Chowdhury, and S. S. Liao, Thermal management ma- terials for 3D-stacked integrated circuits, Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering2, 598 (2025)

  2. [2]

    X. Qian, J. Zhou, and G. Chen, Phonon-engineered ex- treme thermal conductivity materials, Nature Materials 20, 1188 (2021)

  3. [3]

    Maldovan, Sound and heat revolutions in phononics, Nature503, 209 (2013)

    M. Maldovan, Sound and heat revolutions in phononics, Nature503, 209 (2013)

  4. [4]

    Jiang and B

    Y. Jiang and B. Tian, Inorganic semiconductor biointer- faces, Nature Reviews Materials3, 473 (2018)

  5. [5]

    Nomura, J

    M. Nomura, J. Shiomi, T. Shiga, and R. Anufriev, Thermal phonon engineering by tailored nanostructures, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics57, 080101 (2018)

  6. [6]

    D. Ma, X. Wan, and N. Yang, Unexpected thermal con- ductivity enhancement in pillared graphene nanoribbon with isotopic resonance, Physical Review B98, 245420 (2018)

  7. [7]

    S. Liu, Z. Zong, F. Yin, V. Khvesyuk, and N. Yang, Quantifying particle and wave effects in phonon transport of pillared graphene nanoribbons, International Journal of Thermal Sciences217, 110067 (2025)

  8. [8]

    Lee and G

    Y. Lee and G. S. Hwang, Mechanism of thermal conduc- tivity suppression in doped silicon studied with nonequi- librium molecular dynamics, Physical Review B86, 075202 (2012)

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    H. Wei, Y. Hu, and H. Bao, Influence of point defects and multiscale pores on the different phonon transport regimes, Communications Materials4, 3 (2023)

  2. [10]

    X. Wu, Y. Wu, X. Huang, Z. Fan, S. Volz, Q. Han, and M. Nomura, Isotope interface engineering for thermal transport suppression in cryogenic graphene, Materials Today Physics46, 101500 (2024)

  3. [11]

    Y. Xie, L. Zhang, F. Tao, C. Sun, X. Zhang, Y. Gao, and D. Tang, First-Principles Study on Strain-Regulated Thermal Transport Properties and Electronic Properties of Semiconductor Sc2CT2 (T = F, OH), The Journal of Physical Chemistry C129, 15736 (2025)

  4. [12]

    Y. Qin, Z. Zong, J. Che, T. Li, H. Fang, and N. Yang, A significant enhancement in thermal conductivity of plastic crystals under compressive strain by deep poten- tial molecular dynamics, Applied Physics Letters126, 104101 (2025)

  5. [13]

    Zhang, X

    G. Zhang, X. Xiang, Z. Qian, Y. Xu, S. Yue, H. Jang, L. Yang, Y. Zhou, X. Wang, and Q. Zheng, Strain- gradient-driven decoupling of thermal suppression from anisotropy inβ-Ga 2O3, Acta Materialia307, 121973 (2026)

  6. [14]

    N. Li, J. Ren, L. Wang, G. Zhang, P. H¨ anggi, and B. Li,Colloquium: Phononics: Manipulating heat flow with electronic analogs and beyond, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1045 (2012)

  7. [15]

    Wehmeyer, T

    G. Wehmeyer, T. Yabuki, C. Monachon, J. Wu, and C. Dames, Thermal diodes, regulators, and switches: Physical mechanisms and potential applications, Applied Physics Reviews4, 041304 (2017)

  8. [16]

    Aryana, J

    K. Aryana, J. A. Tomko, R. Gao, E. R. Hoglund, T. Mimura, S. Makarem, A. Salanova, M. S. B. Hoque, T. W. Pfeifer, D. H. Olson, J. L. Braun, J. Nag, J. C. Read, J. M. Howe, E. J. Opila, L. W. Martin, J. F. Ihle- feld, and P. E. Hopkins, Observation of solid-state bidi- rectiona...

  9. [17]

    C. Liu, C. Wu, Y. Zhao, Z. Chen, T.-L. Ren, Y. Chen, and G. Zhang, Actively and reversibly controlling ther- mal conductivity in solid materials, Physics Reports 1058, 1 (2024)

  10. [18]

    D. Pan, Z. Zong, and N. Yang, Phonon weak couplings in nanoscale thermophysics, Acta Physica Sinica71, 10.7498/aps.71.20220036 (2022)

  11. [19]

    Yoshida, T

    K. Yoshida, T. Sonobe, H. Zen, K. Hachiya, K. Okumura, K. Mishima, M. Inukai, H. Negm, K. Torgasin, M. Omer, T. Kii, K. Masuda, and H. Ohgaki, Experimental demon- stration of mode-selective phonon excitation of 6H-SiC by a mid-infrared laser with anti-Stokes Raman scatter- ing...

  12. [20]

    Sekiguchi, H

    F. Sekiguchi, H. Hirori, G. Yumoto, A. Shimazaki, T. Nakamura, A. Wakamiya, and Y. Kanemitsu, Enhanc- ing the Hot-Phonon Bottleneck Effect in a Metal Halide Perovskite by Terahertz Phonon Excitation, Physical Re- view Letters126, 077401 (2021)

  13. [21]

    Kozina, M

    M. Kozina, M. Fechner, P. Marsik, T. Van Driel, J. M. Glownia, C. Bernhard, M. Radovic, D. Zhu, S. Bonetti, U. Staub, and M. C. Hoffmann, Terahertz-driven phonon upconversion in SrTiO3, Nature Physics15, 387 (2019)

  14. [22]

    Z. Pan, G. Lu, X. Li, J. R. McBride, R. Juneja, M. Long, L. Lindsay, J. D. Caldwell, and D. Li, Remarkable heat conduction mediated by non-equilibrium phonon polari- tons, Nature623, 307 (2023)

  15. [23]

    Y. Jia, C. Song, D. Chen, Q. Chen, C. Zhang, and S. Meng, Optically-controlled phonon-specific phase transitions from graphite to diamond, Nature Communi- cations17, 381 (2026)

  16. [24]

    Abou-Hamdan, A

    L. Abou-Hamdan, A. Schmitt, R. Bretel, S. Rossetti, M. Tharrault, D. Mele, A. Pierret, M. Rosticher, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Maestre, C. Journet, B. Toury, V. Garnier, P. Steyer, J. H. Edgar, E. Janzen, J.-M. Berroir, G. F` eve, G. M´ enard, B. Pla¸ cais, C. Voisin, J.-P...

  17. [25]

    Q. Guo, I. Esin, C. Li, C. Chen, G. Han, S. Liu, J. H. Edgar, S. Zhou, E. Demler, G. Refael, and F. Xia, Hy- perbolic phonon-polariton electroluminescence in 2D het- erostructures, Nature639, 915 (2025)

  18. [26]

    Chiloyan, S

    V. Chiloyan, S. Huberman, A. A. Maznev, K. A. Nel- son, and G. Chen, Thermal transport exceeding bulk heat conduction due to nonthermal micro/nanoscale phonon populations, Applied Physics Letters116, 163102 (2020)

  19. [27]

    X. Wan, D. Pan, Z. Zong, Y. Qin, J.-T. L¨ u, S. Volz, L. Zhang, and N. Yang, Modulating Thermal Conduc- tivity via Targeted Phonon Excitation, Nano Letters24, 6889 (2024)

  20. [28]

    D. Pan, T. Li, X. Wan, Z. Zong, Y. Qin, and N. Yang, Using Targeted Phonon Excitation to Modulate Thermal Conductivity of Boron Nitride, Chinese Physics Letters 42, 070801 (2025). 11

  21. [29]

    Yang and C

    F. Yang and C. Dames, Mean free path spectra as a tool to understand thermal conductivity in bulk and nanos- tructures, Physical Review B87, 035437 (2013)

  22. [30]

    Chen, Non-Fourier phonon heat conduction at the mi- croscale and nanoscale, Nature Reviews Physics3, 555 (2021)

    G. Chen, Non-Fourier phonon heat conduction at the mi- croscale and nanoscale, Nature Reviews Physics3, 555 (2021)

  23. [31]

    S. Liu, A. A. Barinov, F. Yin, and V. I. Khvesyuk, Determination of thermal properties of unsmooth Si- nanowires, Chinese Physics Letters41, 016301 (2024)

  24. [32]

    Beardo, W

    A. Beardo, W. Chen, B. McBennett, T. Karimzadeh Sa- bet, E. E. Nelson, T. H. Culman, H. C. Kapteyn, J. L. Knobloch, M. M. Murnane, and I. Dabo, Nanoscale con- finement of phonon flow and heat transport, npj Compu- tational Materials11, 172 (2025)

  25. [33]

    Chen,Nanoscale Energy Transport and Conversion: A Parallel Treatment of Electrons, Molecules, Phonons, and Photons(Oxford University Press, 2005)

    G. Chen,Nanoscale Energy Transport and Conversion: A Parallel Treatment of Electrons, Molecules, Phonons, and Photons(Oxford University Press, 2005)

  26. [34]

    Kaviany,Heat Transfer Physics, 2nd ed

    M. Kaviany,Heat Transfer Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

  27. [35]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavaz- zoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Ge...

  28. [36]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, and N. Mingo, Sheng- BTE: A solver of the Boltzmann transport equation for phonons, Computer Physics Communications185, 1747 (2014)

  29. [37]

    R. B. Peterson, Direct Simulation of Phonon-Mediated Heat Transfer in a Debye Crystal, Journal of Heat Trans- fer116, 815 (1994)

  30. [38]

    Mazumder and A

    S. Mazumder and A. Majumdar, Monte Carlo Study of Phonon Transport in Solid Thin Films Including Disper- sion and Polarization, Journal of Heat Transfer123, 749 (2001)

  31. [39]

    Anufriev and M

    R. Anufriev and M. Nomura, Ray phononics: Thermal guides, emitters, filters, and shields powered by ballistic phonon transport, Materials Today Physics15, 100272 (2020)

  32. [40]

    Z. Zhou, Y. He, S. Liu, L. Yang, and N. Yang, Effect of Non-Fourier Heat Transport on Temperature Distribu- tion in High Bandwidth Memory, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices73, 561 (2026)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.