Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 112 references

Chiral magnons for spin-qubit state transfer

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that chiral magnons in a YIG stripe, with time-tunable coupling, can transfer an arbitrary spin-qubit state between two nitrogen-vacancy centers with fidelity ≳0.95 while the pair stays in a dark state of the magnon bath.

desk verdict Worth a serious referee, but the fidelity claim rests on an untested perfect-unidirectionality assumption that needs a robustness analysis before it lands. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29206 v1 pith:U5OKDDXG submitted 2026-07-31 quant-ph

Martijn Dols , Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero , Mikhail Cherkasskii , Christian L. Degen , Victor A. S. V. Bittencourt , Silvia Viola Kusminskiy This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords chiralmagnonsstatetransfernitrogen-vacancycentersdarknonreciprocalYIGstripeDamon-Eshbachmodesquantuminformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Chiral magnons — the collective spin excitations of a magnetic insulator — propagate nonreciprocally, and this paper shows how to exploit that directionality to transfer an arbitrary qubit state from one spin qubit to a distant one. The core idea is to time-modulate the qubit–magnon coupling so the two-qubit state always sits in the dark subspace of the magnon bath: the excitation flows from sender to receiver while the bath is never populated, bypassing the losses that usually accompany a dissipative channel. The protocol is worked out concretely for two nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers coupled to the Damon–Eshbach surface modes of a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) stripe, where the coupling is tuned by moving the NVs and/or changing the magnetic field. Using realistic parameters, the authors find a state-transfer fidelity ≳0.95 over several microns, provided the NV dephasing time exceeds about 25 ms and the temperature stays near 25 mK or below; a field-modulation variant needs only one movable NV but demands dephasing times of tens of seconds.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dark-state condition L(t)|ψ(t)⟩=0 for the collective jump operator L(t)=√J1(t)e^{−ik r1}σ⁻₁ + √J2(t)e^{−ik r2}σ⁻₂. A two-qubit state that satisfies this condition at all times never emits into the magnon bath, so the transfer is lossless except for intrinsic qubit decay and dephasing. The unidirectional effective interaction H_uni=−iℏ√(J1 J2)e^{ik r21}σ⁻₁σ⁺₂ carries the excitation from qubit 1 to qubit 2, and the required time-dependent couplings follow from the ansatz f(t): J1=ḟ/(1−f), J2=ḟ/f, with phase matching k_q r21=π+2πn to preserve the local phase. In the NV–YIG implementation, these couplings are realized through the exponential distance dependence J

What would settle it

Measure the NV–magnon coupling asymmetry for +k and −k modes on a YIG stripe (e.g., from the magnon-induced decay rate of a single NV) and insert the measured g_{k<0}/g_{k>0} into the master equation used here; if a realistic backward-coupling ratio of a few percent pushes the predicted fidelity below 0.95 at Jmax=0.8 kHz, the protocol's central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that nonreciprocal, chiral magnons can act as a unidirectional quantum channel for deterministic spin-qubit state transfer, and that the required time-dependent coupling can be engineered on a hybrid NV–YIG platform. Starting from a strictly one-sided qubit–magnon coupling (g_{k<0,i}=0), the effective dynamics is unidirectional: qubit 1 can drive qubit 2 but not vice versa. The authors choose the transfer function f(t) so that the jump operator L(t) annihilates the evolving two-qubit state; with J1=ḟ/(1−f) and J2=ḟ/f, the state |ψ⟩₁|0⟩₂ evolves to |0⟩₁|ψ⟩₂ without populating the magnon bath. Numerically, the distance-modulation implementation yields fidelity ≳0

Load-bearing premise

The argument collapses if the qubit–magnon coupling is not strictly unidirectional: the paper assumes g_{k<0,i}=0 and gives no robustness analysis, whereas real Damon–Eshbach modes are chiral but not perfectly one-sided.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Distance-modulation scheme: two NV centers a few microns apart reach state-transfer fidelity ≳0.95 with a maximal coupling of about 0.8 kHz and protocol time ~8 ms, provided dephasing time ≳25 ms.
  • Field-modulation scheme: with only one NV moved and the bias field varied, the protocol can be built on scanning NV magnetometer setups, but the required dephasing time grows to ≳20 s for fidelity ≳0.87.
  • Choosing the NV separation to satisfy k_q r21=π+2πn preserves the input state's local phase; other separations can imprint a controlled local phase on the transferred state.
  • Because the two-qubit state stays dark throughout, the transfer is insensitive to the magnon bath loss rate (within the Markov, low-temperature regime); residual infidelity is dominated by qubit dephasing and thermal excitation above k_B T≈0.2ℏω_q.
  • The protocol transfers arbitrary superpositions, not just excitation, and can be switched off by detuning the qubits from resonance, making it a candidate building block for spin-based quantum networks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct quantitative extension would be to include a residual backward coupling g_{k<0}=η g_{k>0}; I would expect the fidelity ≳0.95 to survive only for η of at most a few percent, because the dark-state condition is exact only at η=0.
  • The same dark-state transfer may work on other chiral magnon platforms — for example, films with interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction or topological magnon edge modes — since the master-equation derivation only requires a unidirectional spectral density, not the specific YIG stripe geometry.
  • Because the protocol keeps the pair in a dark subspace, it could be combined with entanglement operations on the same nodes: a superposition of dark states might be used to distribute or preserve entanglement between the two qubits without bath losses, an application the paper does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and numerically benchmarks a protocol for deterministic transfer of an arbitrary spin-qubit state between two distant qubits mediated by chiral magnons. The protocol time-modulates the qubit–magnon couplings so that the two-qubit state remains in the null space of the dissipative jump operator, thereby suppressing magnon-bath loss. The authors derive a time-dependent Markov master equation for two qubits coupled unidirectionally to a magnon bath (App. A), construct explicit coupling schedules f(t) (Sec. III), and benchmark the protocol against qubit decay, dephasing, and temperature (Figs. 2, 3). They then apply the protocol to NV centers coupled to Damon–Eshbach modes of a YIG stripe and propose two implementations: moving both NVs relative to the stripe (Sec. IV A) or sweeping the bias field while moving one NV (Sec. IV B). The headline result is a predicted fidelity ≳0.95 for method (i) with realistic parameters and T_phi≈25 ms.

Significance. If the ideal unidirectionality assumption is accepted, this is a solid and timely contribution. The paper transfers well-established dark-state/chiral-optics ideas to a magnonic platform, provides a self-contained derivation of the time-dependent master equation, explicitly checks the Markov and wide-band conditions (κ_m/[v k_q]≈10^-4), and gives concrete parameter tables for a realistic NV–YIG implementation. The second implementation, with only one moving NV, is an experimentally relevant simplification. The numerical benchmarks are clearly described and reproducible in structure. The main scientific interest is in the combination of intrinsic chirality of DE magnons with time-dependent coupling engineering; if the robustness gaps are closed, the result would be a useful addition to quantum magnonics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II/App. A, Eq. (A14)] The entire protocol is built on the assumption g_{k<0,i}=0. This is stated before Eq. (3), used in App. A to evaluate the residue (Eq. A14), and is the basis of the dark-state condition Eq. (10) that suppresses bath loss. In the implementation, the DE-mode polarization in Eq. (D2) is idealized as exactly circular (δH_k ∝ e_∓ for k≷0). A finite-width stripe, exchange corrections, finite mode ellipticity, or an NV quantization axis not perfectly matched to the circular basis will give a nonzero g_{k<0,i}/g_{k>0,i}. The paper gives no estimate of this ratio for the proposed geometry and no simulation of its effect. Since the claim is a fidelity ≳0.95, even a few percent backward coupling can break the dark-state condition and add loss. I request a quantitative robustness analysis (e.g., F vs g_{k<0}/g_{k>0}) or an explicit statement that the headline claim is conditional on perfect unidirec
  2. [Sec. III and Fig. 2(c)] The arbitrary-state claim is not fully benchmarked. The numerical fidelity study uses only the initial state |1>_1|0>_2 (α=0, β=1). For a general input α|0>+β|1>, the fidelity depends also on the coherence between |00> and the single-excitation sector, which is damped by the dephasing dissipator 1/T_phi Σ D[σ^+σ^-]. The α=0 benchmark does not probe this coherence, so the quoted condition T_phi≈20/J for F>0.95 is not established for arbitrary superpositions. Please simulate the worst-case superposition (e.g., α=β=1/√2) and report the corresponding required T_phi, or qualify the abstract/Sec. III claims so that they refer to the benchmarked transfer of a single excitation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table I and Sec. IV] The table uses L_y=100d0 and L_z=15d0, but d0 is not defined in the table; it should presumably be the stripe thickness d (150 nm). Also, the sentence 'dimensions L_z ≫ L_y ≫ d' appears inconsistent with the table, which implies L_y ≫ L_z.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. IV B] The abstract's 'fidelity ≳0.95' should be tied to Method I. Method II (Sec. IV B) reports F>0.87 with T_phi≈20 s; the current wording could mislead readers into attributing 0.95 to both methods.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (19)] The protocol time in Eq. (19) depends on |α|^2. Since the state is supposed to be arbitrary and unknown, state explicitly that t_p should be chosen for the worst case α=0, or note that the required time is state-dependent.
  4. [Sec. IV B, Fig. 7] The phrase 'magnetic field over 9 mT/µ0' is confusing; the field amplitude should be quoted as μ0H0 ≈ 9 mT.
  5. [Sec. II, Eq. (3)] The assumption g_{k<0,i}=0 is introduced as part of the model but is not derived or justified at that point; a short physical justification (or a pointer to App. D and Ref. 35) would help the reader appreciate the scope of the idealization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dark-state protocol is a control-design construction benchmarked against independent decoherence and literature parameters; self-citations to Ref. 35 are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. Appendix A re-derives the effective master equation from the Born-Markov approximation with time-dependent couplings rather than importing it from Ref. 35; the unidirectional form follows from the explicitly stated assumption g_{k<0,i}=0 and a residue-theorem evaluation (Eq. A14). Appendix B derives the required couplings J1(t), J2(t) by imposing the dark-state condition (Eq. 10) and the transfer ansatz (Eq. 14); this is inverse control design, so the ideal-state fidelity in Eq. (16) is a designed target, not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction. The actual feasibility statement is not forced: the paper independently benchmarks the protocol against added qubit dephasing and decay (Fig. 2c) and finite temperature (Fig. 3), and the quoted numbers (Jmax=0.8 kHz, protocol time ~8 ms, T_phi=25 ms) are obtained from literature parameters in Table I. The self-citations to Ref. 35 for the master-equation method and the DE-mode profiles are accompanied in this paper by explicit derivations/formulas (Apps. A and D) and standard references (Damon-Eshbach, Polder susceptibility), so they are not load-bearing. The assumption of perfectly unidirectional coupling g_{k<0}=0 is a physical idealization; residual backward coupling would be a robustness/correctness concern, not a circularity, because the paper does not define the fidelity in terms of that assumption beyond its model. Overall, no step reduces the central claim to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The protocol uses no new particles or forces. The main input parameters are design choices (distances, field, quantization length) rather than free fits. The heaviest assumptions are standard open-quantum-system approximations plus the idealized perfect unidirectionality of the chiral magnon coupling.

free parameters (4)
  • d_min (minimal NV-YIG distance) = 50 nm
    Taken from scanning NV magnetometry literature (Refs. 92-95). Sets the maximum coupling Jmax and hence protocol time; chosen by hand, not fitted to the target fidelity.
  • d0 (fixed NV-YIG offset distance) = 50 nm (method i); 0.5 μm (method ii)
    For method (i), d0 = d_min to maximize coupling. For method (ii), d0 = 0.5 μm to balance the required Jmax/Jmin ratio against the achievable Jmax. This is a design choice.
  • L_y (quantization length along propagation) = 100 d0 (≈5–50 μm)
    Used in the mode normalization and coupling J0. Chosen as a convenient multiple of d0; it is a modeling parameter, not a direct experimental constraint.
  • External magnetic field μ0H0 (method i, nominal) = 8 mT
    Chosen so that the resonant wave number k_q gives the phase-matching distance y21 = π/k_q × (1+2n) = 0.4 μm. Sets the operating point of the qubit and magnon frequencies.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Born-Markov approximation with time-dependent coupling: τ_m ≪ τ_q, τ_g and g(t-τ) ≈ g(t) for τ on the bath-correlation timescale.
    Invoked in Sec. II and App. A to derive the time-local master equation (4). The paper checks the resulting conditions for the parameters used.
  • domain assumption Wide-band approximation κ_m/v_{k_q} ≪ k_q, allowing the residue-theorem evaluation of the bath kernel.
    Used in App. A to go from Eq. (A14) to Eq. (A15). The paper states κ_m/[v_kq(t) k_q(t)] = O(10^-4) for the parameters of Sec. IV.
  • domain assumption Linear spin-wave theory and restriction to Damon-Eshbach surface modes with k_z = 0; higher-order modes neglected because they are far detuned.
    Sec. IV and App. D use the DE-mode dispersion and field profiles; neglect of k_z>0 modes is justified by the detuning condition g_{n_z,k} ≪ |ω_{n_z,k} - ω_q|.
  • ad hoc to paper Perfectly unidirectional coupling: g_{k<0,i} = 0, and the coupling to the |+⟩ NV transition is neglected because g^+/g^- = 10^-2.
    This is the central idealization. Sec. IV states the chiral selection rule and the factor 10^-2, but the protocol analysis assumes exact unidirectionality with no residual backward coupling. This is the weakest load-bearing premise.
  • domain assumption Qubit separation is much smaller than the magnon coherence length, so exp(-α r) ≈ 1 for all times.
    App. A sets exp(-α(t) r_{ij}) = 1. The paper uses r ≈ 0.4 μm and l_m ≈ 0.3 mm, so the condition is satisfied for the nominal parameters.
  • domain assumption The magnon bath remains in a thermal state at all times (Born approximation); thermalization is fast compared with the timescale of parameter variation (τ_m ≪ τ_ωk, τ_ωq).
    App. A uses the thermal occupation n̄_k(t) evaluated at time t. This is necessary for the finite-temperature master equation and is valid under the stated timescale separation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral magnons for spin-qubit state transfer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U5OKDDXG

@misc{pith2026260729206,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral magnons for spin-qubit state transfer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U5OKDDXG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29206}
}
abstract

We propose a protocol where chiral magnons mediate a state transfer between two distant spin qubits. The protocol is implemented by varying the coupling between the spin qubits and the magnons in time, such that an arbitrary state is transferred from one qubit to the other. The modulation of the coupling is performed such that the two-spin-qubit state is kept as a dark state of the magnon bath, bypassing the associated losses. We show that the protocol can be realized on a hybrid system composed of two nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers coupled to the nonreciprocal and chiral magnon modes of an yttrium iron garnet (YIG) stripe. We propose two methods to achieve the time modulation of the NV-magnon coupling: i) the NV-magnet distance of both NV centers is varied; ii) the external magnetic field and the NV-magnet distance of one NV center are varied. We evaluate the implementability of both methods numerically, including the constraints on the temperature, and the dephasing time and minimal lifetime of the spin qubits required for high-fidelity state transfer. We find that using realistic experimental parameters, a state transfer between NV centers at a distance of several microns can be achieved with a fidelity $\gtrsim 0.95$. Our findings expand the toolbox of magnonics for quantum information purposes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29206 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Two qubits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: In red: effective coupling a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: The proposed setup. Two NV centers integrated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: a) Coupling strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: b). In turn, the distance δx2(t) is varied such that also the coupling J2(t) is realized. With Eq. (25) one finds J2(t) = J1(t)e −2|kq(t)|δx2(t) . Using Eq. (15), this relation can be inverted to obtain δx2(t) as a function of kq(t) and the function f(t) (see Sec. III)…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The qubit frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: In red: effective coupling a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature Communications , volume =

    One-Second Coherence for a Single Electron Spin Coupled to a Multi-Qubit Nuclear-Spin Environment , author =. Nature Communications , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04916-z , copyright =

    doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04916-z

  2. [2]

    and Litvinenko, A

    An, K. and Litvinenko, A. N. and Kohno, R. and Fuad, A. A. and Naletov, V. V. and Vila, L. and Ebels, U. and. Coherent Long-Range Transfer of Angular Momentum between Magnon. Physical Review B , volume =

  3. [3]

    and Bertet, P

    Arrazola, I. and Bertet, P. and Chu, Y. and Rabl, P. , year = 2025, month = nov, journal =. Engineering Protected Cavity-. doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01143-5 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01143-5 2025

  4. [4]

    Nature Photonics , volume =

    Quantum Technologies with Optically Interfaced Solid-State Spins , author =. Nature Photonics , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0232-2 , copyright =

    doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0232-2

  5. [5]

    Nature Communications , volume =

    Solid-State Electronic Spin Coherence Time Approaching One Second , author =. Nature Communications , volume =. doi:10.1038/ncomms2771 , copyright =

    doi:10.1038/ncomms2771

  6. [6]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Parametric Magnon Transduction to Spin Qubits , author =. Science Advances , volume =

  7. [7]

    Interfacial

    Belmeguenai, Mohamed and Adam, Jean-Paul and Roussign. Interfacial. Physical Review B , volume =

  8. [8]

    Nature Materials , volume =

    Dispersion-Tunable Low-Loss Implanted Spin-Wave Waveguides for Large Magnonic Networks , author =. Nature Materials , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41563-025-02282-y , copyright =

    doi:10.1038/s41563-025-02282-y

Show all 112 references
  1. [9]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spin-Wave Transport and Interference in a Magnetic Insulator , author =. Science Advances , volume =

  2. [10]

    Bittencourt, V. A. S. V. and Liberal, I. and Viola Kusminskiy, S. , year = 2022, month = may, journal =. Optomagnonics in

    2022

  3. [11]

    Breuer, Heinz-Peter and Petruccione, Francesco , year = 2007, month = jan, edition =. The. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 , isbn =

    2007

  4. [12]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Classical and Quantum Theory of Magnonic and Magnetoelastic Nonlinear Dynamics in Continuum Geometries , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  5. [13]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Dynamic Entanglement in Oscillating Molecules and Potential Biological Implications , author =. Physical Review E , volume =

  6. [14]

    New Journal of Physics , volume =

    Robust Dynamical Decoupling with Concatenated Continuous Driving , author =. New Journal of Physics , volume =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113023 , langid =

    doi

  7. [15]

    Nature Reviews Materials , volume =

    Probing Condensed Matter Physics with Magnetometry Based on Nitrogen-Vacancy Centres in Diamond , author =. Nature Reviews Materials , volume =. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.88 , copyright =

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    The Saga of

    Cherepanov, Vladimir and Kolokolov, Igor and L'vov, Victor , year = 1993, month = jul, journal =. The Saga of

    1993

  9. [17]

    Chumak, A. V. and Kabos, P. and Wu, M. and Abert, C. and Adelmann, C. and Adeyeye, A. O. and. Advances in. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics , volume =

  10. [18]

    Nature Physics , volume =

    Magnon Spintronics , author =. Nature Physics , volume =. doi:10.1038/nphys3347 , copyright =

    doi

  11. [19]

    Cirac, J. I. and Zoller, P. and Kimble, H. J. and Mabuchi, H. , year = 1997, month = apr, journal =. Quantum

    1997

  12. [20]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume =

    Influence of the. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume =

  13. [21]

    Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , volume =

    Magnetostatic Modes of a Ferromagnet Slab , author =. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , volume =

  14. [22]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.19066 , archiveprefix =

    Sensing Magnonic Quantum Superpositions Using a Bosonic Mode as the Probe , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.19066 , archiveprefix =. 2507.19066 , primaryclass =

    doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Physics Reports , series =

    The Nitrogen-Vacancy Colour Centre in Diamond , author =. Physics Reports , series =

  16. [24]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Magnon-Mediated Quantum Gates for Superconducting Qubits , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  17. [25]

    Physical Review Research , volume =

    Steady-State Entanglement of Spin Qubits Mediated by Nonreciprocal and Chiral Magnons , author =. Physical Review Research , volume =

  18. [26]

    arXiv.org , howpublished =

    Optics-Microwave Entanglement and State Teleportation Mediated by a Cavity Magnomechanical System , author =. arXiv.org , howpublished =

  19. [27]

    and Bittencourt, V.A.S.V

    Engelhardt, F. and Bittencourt, V.A.S.V. and Huebl, H. and Klein, O. and Kusminskiy, S. Viola , year = 2022, month = oct, journal =. Optimal

    2022

  20. [28]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume =

    The 2024 Magnonics Roadmap , author =. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume =

    2024

  21. [29]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Entangling Distant Spin Qubits via a Magnetic Domain Wall , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  22. [30]

    Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , volume =

    Selective Dynamical Decoupling for Quantum State Transfer , author =. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/48/2/025501 , langid =

    doi

  23. [31]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Magnon-Mediated Qubit Coupling Determined via Dissipation Measurements , author =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

  24. [32]

    and Awschalom, David D

    Fukami, Masaya and Candido, Denis R. and Awschalom, David D. and Flatt. Opportunities for. PRX Quantum , volume =

  25. [33]

    Coherent

    Gallardo, Rodolfo and Weigand, Markus and Schultheiss, Katrin and Kakay, Attila and Mattheis, Roland and Raabe, J. Coherent. ACS Nano , volume =

  26. [34]

    Gallardo, R. A. and. Flat. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  27. [35]

    and Schneider, T

    Gallardo, R.A. and Schneider, T. and Chaurasiya, A.K. and Oelschl. Reconfigurable. Physical Review Applied , volume =

  28. [36]

    New Journal of Physics , volume =

    Spin-Wave Non-Reciprocity in Magnetization-Graded Ferromagnetic Films , author =. New Journal of Physics , volume =

  29. [37]

    New Journal of Physics , volume =

    Non-. New Journal of Physics , volume =

  30. [38]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Quantum. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  31. [39]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Towards a Quantum Interface between Spin Waves and Paramagnetic Spin Baths , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  32. [40]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Theory of Quantum Acoustomagnonics and Acoustomechanics with a Micromagnet , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  33. [41]

    Nature Reviews Physics , volume =

    Light--Matter Interactions in Quantum Nanophotonic Devices , author =. Nature Reviews Physics , volume =. doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00681-1 , copyright =

    doi

  34. [42]

    and Creedon, Daniel L

    Goryachev, Maxim and Farr, Warrick G. and Creedon, Daniel L. and Fan, Yaohui and Kostylev, Mikhail and Tobar, Michael E. , year = 2014, month = nov, journal =. High-

    2014

  35. [43]

    Nanoscale

    Hache, Toni and Anshu, Anshu and Shalomayeva, Tetyana and Richter, Gunther and St. Nanoscale. Nano Letters , volume =

  36. [44]

    Haigh, J. A. and Lambert, N. J. and Sharma, S. and Blanter, Y. M. and Bauer, G. E. W. and Ramsay, A. J. , year = 2018, month = jun, journal =. Selection Rules for Cavity-Enhanced

    2018

  37. [45]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Nonreciprocal Spin-Wave Dispersion in Magnetic Bilayers , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  38. [46]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Long-Distance Coupling of Spin Qubits via Topological Magnons , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  39. [47]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Spin-Wave Calculations for Multilayered Structures , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  40. [48]

    and Lotze, Johannes and Hocke, Fredrik and Greifenstein, Moritz and Marx, Achim and Gross, Rudolf and Goennenwein, Sebastian T

    Huebl, Hans and Zollitsch, Christoph W. and Lotze, Johannes and Hocke, Fredrik and Greifenstein, Moritz and Marx, Achim and Gross, Rudolf and Goennenwein, Sebastian T. B. , year = 2013, month = sep, journal =. High

    2013

  41. [49]

    Physical Review Applied , volume =

    Harmonic and Subharmonic Magnon Generation in a Surface-Acoustic-Wave Resonator , author =. Physical Review Applied , volume =

  42. [50]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Switchable Giant Nonreciprocal Frequency Shift of Propagating Spin Waves in Synthetic Antiferromagnets , author =. Science Advances , volume =

  43. [51]

    Scientific Reports , volume =

    Spin Wave Nonreciprocity for Logic Device Applications , author =. Scientific Reports , volume =. doi:10.1038/srep03160 , copyright =

    doi

  44. [52]

    Physical Review Research , volume =

    Magnon-Mediated Spin Entanglement in the Strong-Coupling Regime , author =. Physical Review Research , volume =

  45. [53]

    Curvilinear Spin-Wave Dynamics beyond the Thin-Shell Approximation:

    K. Curvilinear Spin-Wave Dynamics beyond the Thin-Shell Approximation:. Physical Review B , volume =

  46. [54]

    Kounalakis, Marios and Bauer, Gerrit E. W. and Blanter, Yaroslav M. , year = 2022, month = jul, journal =. Analog

    2022

  47. [55]

    Science , volume =

    Entanglement-Based Single-Shot Detection of a Single Magnon with a Superconducting Qubit , author =. Science , volume =

  48. [56]

    Lehmberg, R. H. , year = 1970, month = sep, journal =. Radiation from an \

    1970

  49. [57]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Optomagnonics in Magnetic Solids , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  50. [58]

    Nature , volume =

    Chiral Quantum Optics , author =. Nature , volume =. doi:10.1038/nature21037 , copyright =

    doi

  51. [59]

    Nature Nanotechnology , volume =

    A Robust Scanning Diamond Sensor for Nanoscale Imaging with Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centres , author =. Nature Nanotechnology , volume =. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.50 , copyright =

    2012 doi

  52. [60]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Chiral Phonons and Phononic Birefringence in Ferromagnetic Metal--Bulk Acoustic Resonator Hybrids , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  53. [61]

    and Serha, Rostyslav O

    Mycroft, Monika E. and Serha, Rostyslav O. and Chumak, Andrii V. and. Quantum. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.12833 , archiveprefix =. 2601.12833 , primaryclass =

    doi

  54. [62]

    Nanomagnonic

    Neuman, Tom. Nanomagnonic. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  55. [63]

    and Hisatomi, R

    Osada, A. and Hisatomi, R. and Noguchi, A. and Tabuchi, Y. and Yamazaki, R. and Usami, K. and Sadgrove, M. and Yalla, R. and Nomura, M. and Nakamura, Y. , year = 2016, month = jun, journal =. Cavity

    2016

  56. [64]

    Curvature-

    Ot. Curvature-. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  57. [65]

    Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing , volume =

    Propagation Characteristics of Magnetostatic Waves , author =. Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing , volume =

  58. [66]

    Optics Letters , volume =

    Cavity Magnon--Polariton Interface for Strong Spin--Spin Coupling , author =. Optics Letters , volume =. doi:10.1364/OL.545688 , copyright =

    doi

  59. [67]

    Physical Review A , volume =

    Quantum Optics of Chiral Spin Networks , author =. Physical Review A , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.042116 , copyright =

    doi

  60. [68]

    Potts, C. A. and Varga, E. and Bittencourt, V. A. S. V. and Kusminskiy, S. Viola and Davis, J. P. , year = 2021, month = sep, journal =. Dynamical

    2021

  61. [69]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Squeezing and Quantum Control of the Antiferromagnetic Magnon Pseudospin , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  62. [70]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , volume =

    Magnetometry with Nitrogen-Vacancy Defects in Diamond , author =. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503 , langid =

    doi

  63. [71]

    Applied Physics Letters , volume =

    Nanoscale Magnetic Field Mapping with a Single Spin Scanning Probe Magnetometer , author =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =

  64. [72]

    Master Equations for Pulsed Magnetic Fields:

    Rousochatzakis, Ioannis and Luban, Marshall , year = 2005, month = oct, journal =. Master Equations for Pulsed Magnetic Fields:

    2005

  65. [73]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Magnetization Dynamics Affected by Phonon Pumping , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  66. [74]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Phase Reciprocity of Spin-Wave Excitation by a Microstrip Antenna , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  67. [75]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.22773 , archiveprefix =

    Ultra-Long-Living Magnons in the Quantum Limit , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.22773 , archiveprefix =. 2505.22773 , publisher =

    doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Spin Cat States in Ferromagnetic Insulators , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  69. [77]

    Journal of Applied Physics , volume =

    Spin Wave Isolator Based on Frequency Displacement Nonreciprocity in Ferromagnetic Bilayer , author =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =

  70. [78]

    Sluka, Volker and Schneider, Tobias and Gallardo, Rodolfo A. and K. Emission and Propagation of. Nature Nanotechnology , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0383-4 , copyright =

    doi

  71. [79]

    Soykal,. Strong. 2010 , month = feb, journal =

    2010

  72. [80]

    and Prabhakar, Anil , year = 2009, publisher =

    Stancil, Daniel D. and Prabhakar, Anil , year = 2009, publisher =. Spin Waves: Theory and Applications , shorttitle =

    2009

  73. [81]

    New Journal of Physics , volume =

    Driven-Dissipative Preparation of Entangled States in Cascaded Quantum-Optical Networks , author =. New Journal of Physics , volume =

  74. [82]

    Physical Review A , volume =

    Optomechanical Transducers for Quantum-Information Processing , author =. Physical Review A , volume =

  75. [83]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Chiral. PRX Quantum , volume =

  76. [84]

    Magnetic Domains and Domain Wall Pinning in Atomically Thin

    Sun, Qi-Chao and Song, Tiancheng and Anderson, Eric and Brunner, Andreas and F. Magnetic Domains and Domain Wall Pinning in Atomically Thin. Nature Communications , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22239-4 , copyright =

    doi

  77. [85]

    Science , volume =

    Coherent Coupling between a Ferromagnetic Magnon and a Superconducting Qubit , author =. Science , volume =

  78. [86]

    Hybridizing

    Tabuchi, Yutaka and Ishino, Seiichiro and Ishikawa, Toyofumi and Yamazaki, Rekishu and Usami, Koji and Nakamura, Yasunobu , year = 2014, month = aug, journal =. Hybridizing

    2014

  79. [87]

    and Troncoso, R

    Tacchi, S. and Troncoso, R. E. and Ahlberg, M. and Gubbiotti, G. and Madami, M. and. Interfacial. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  80. [88]

    Physical Review Applied , volume =

    Unidirectional Spin Waves Measured Using Propagating-Spin-Wave Spectroscopy , author =. Physical Review Applied , volume =

  81. [89]

    and Wang, Z

    Thiel, L. and Wang, Z. and Tschudin, M. A. and Rohner, D. and. Probing Magnetism in. Science , volume =

  82. [90]

    and Loss, Daniel , year = 2013, month = dec, journal =

    Trifunovic, Luka and Pedrocchi, Fabio L. and Loss, Daniel , year = 2013, month = dec, journal =. Long-

    2013

  83. [91]

    and Szunyogh, L

    Udvardi, L. and Szunyogh, L. , year = 2009, month = may, journal =. Chiral

    2009

  84. [92]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.10176 , archiveprefix =

    Topological, Multi-Mode Amplification Induced by Non-Reciprocal, Long-Range Dissipative Couplings , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.10176 , archiveprefix =. 2405.10176 , publisher =

    doi

  85. [93]

    and Guimond, P.-O

    Vermersch, B. and Guimond, P.-O. and Pichler, H. and Zoller, P. , year = 2017, month = mar, journal =. Quantum

    2017

  86. [94]

    Dynamical

    Viola, Lorenza and Knill, Emanuel and Lloyd, Seth , year = 1999, month = mar, journal =. Dynamical

    1999

  87. [95]

    Physical Review A , volume =

    Coupled Spin-Light Dynamics in Cavity Optomagnonics , author =. Physical Review A , volume =

  88. [96]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Quantum Computing with Defects , author =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

  89. [97]

    and Huebl, H

    Weiler, M. and Huebl, H. and Goerg, F. S. and Czeschka, F. D. and Gross, R. and Goennenwein, S. T. B. , year = 2012, month = apr, journal =. Spin

    2012

  90. [98]

    Nature Nanotechnology , volume =

    Magnetic Vortex Cores as Tunable Spin-Wave Emitters , author =. Nature Nanotechnology , volume =. doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.117 , copyright =

    2016 doi

  91. [99]

    Applied Physics Letters , volume =

    Unidirectional Propagation of Zero-Momentum Magnons , author =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =

  92. [100]

    Progress in Surface Science , volume =

    Surface Dynamics of Magnetic Materials , author =. Progress in Surface Science , volume =

  93. [101]

    Wolski, S. P. and. Dissipation-. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  94. [102]

    Intracity

    Xiang, Ze-Liang and Zhang, Mengzhen and Jiang, Liang and Rabl, Peter , year = 2017, month = mar, journal =. Intracity

    2017

  95. [103]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    Directional Entanglement of Spin-Orbit Locked Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers by Magnons , author =. Physical Review B , volume =

  96. [104]

    and Zhu, Shi-Yao and You, J

    Xu, Da and Gu, Xu-Ke and Li, He-Kang and Weng, Yuan-Chao and Wang, Yi-Pu and Li, Jie and Wang, H. and Zhu, Shi-Yao and You, J. Q. , year = 2023, month = may, journal =. Quantum

    2023

  97. [105]

    Yamamoto, Takashi and. Ten-

  98. [106]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , volume =

    Hybrid Opto-Mechanical Systems with Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers , author =. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , volume =

  99. [107]

    Yuan, H. Y. and Cao, Yunshan and Kamra, Akashdeep and Duine, Rembert A. and Yan, Peng , year = 2022, month = jun, journal =. Quantum Magnonics:

    2022

  100. [108]

    Asymmetric

    Zakeri,. Asymmetric. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  101. [109]

    Physics Reports , series =

    Cavity Magnonics , author =. Physics Reports , series =

  102. [110]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Cavity Magnomechanics , author =. Science Advances , volume =

  103. [111]

    , year = 2016, month = sep, journal =

    Zhang, Xufeng and Zhu, Na and Zou, Chang-Ling and Tang, Hong X. , year = 2016, month = sep, journal =. Optomagnonic

    2016

  104. [112]

    , year = 2014, month = oct, journal =

    Zhang, Xufeng and Zou, Chang-Ling and Jiang, Liang and Tang, Hong X. , year = 2014, month = oct, journal =. Strongly

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.