Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Resolving competing distortions in Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 using complementary electron and X-ray techniques

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the high-temperature I4/mcm phase of Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 is locally perforated by nanoscale platelets with in-phase M2+ octahedral tilts, which X-ray diffraction averages away but electron diffraction resolves, explaining t

desk verdict A solid TEM/PXRD study that directly images nanoscale tilt disorder in the I4/mcm phase; the M2+ platelet attribution is plausible but rests on weak ED evidence and needs confirmation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29346 v1 pith:OBXTQBPW submitted 2026-07-31 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Robin Sjökvist , Catriona A. Crawford , Richard Beanland , Mark S. Senn This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords perovskiteoctahedraltiltingphasetransitiontransmissionelectronmicroscopydiffractionorderparametersRamanspectroscopyCa0.4Sr0.6TiO3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the high-temperature I4/mcm phase of Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 is not a uniform tetragonal structure despite what powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) shows. Using electron diffraction and dark-field imaging, the authors find M-point superstructure reflections that PXRD misses and trace them to nanoscale platelets, a few unit cells thick, with in-phase M2+ octahedral tilts. These platelets persist well above the 380 K transition and are probably the local lower-symmetry structure that vibrational (Raman) spectroscopy has been sensing for a long time. If correct, the average structure inferred from X-rays is locally perforated by platelets with a different tilt pattern, reconciling two families of measurements and explaining related anomalies such as hysteresis and elastic softening.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the use of order-parameter-specific dark-field imaging and selected-area electron diffraction: each distortion mode (the R, M, T, and Δ irreps) produces its own superstructure reflections, so imaging an M-point reflection isolates the platelet population while imaging a Δ-point reflection tracks the loss of coherence of the low-temperature Pbcm phase. The load-bearing identification is the assignment of the M-point reflections to in-phase M2+ tilts, based on systematic absences and the diffuse streaks along 001PC directions, rather than to the M5- antiferrodistortive displacements present at low temperature.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to record the M-point superstructure reflections at 400 K in a crystal tilted to avoid strong dynamical diffraction conditions and check whether their extinction rules match M2+ and the 001PC streaks remain diffuse; if the reflections vanish away from the kinematical orientation or show a different extinction pattern, the platelet interpretation would collapse. Alternatively, atomic-resolution imaging with oxygen-column sensitivity across a platelet at temperature could directly show whether in-phase tilts exist inside these few-nanometre sheets.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the I4/mcm phase of Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 contains a high density of nanoscale (001)PC platelets, only a few unit cells thick and a few nanometres wide, whose local octahedral tilting is of the in-phase M2+ type rather than the out-of-phase tilting pattern of the surrounding matrix. These platelets are invisible to PXRD because Scherrer broadening smears their already-weak superstructure reflections beyond detection, but electron diffraction reveals them directly, and their systematic absences and streak geometry point to M2+ in-phase tilting. Their persistence far above the transition temperature resolves the long-standing contradiction between Raman spectra, which indica

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the extra electron-diffraction spots above 380 K come from static in-phase tilting of oxygen octahedra in nanoscale platelets, not from another distortion, from stacking-fault contrast, or from electrons scattering more than once.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the local M2+ tilted platelets provide a concrete microscopic origin for Raman spectra that persistently show lower-than-tetragonal symmetry in samples that X-ray diffraction indexes as I4/mcm.
  • The persistence of the platelets well above 380 K explains the hysteresis in the Pbcm-to-I4/mcm transition and the observed softening of elastic constants extending tens of kelvin above the transition.
  • The phase transition proceeds by a loss of coherence of tilts along [001]PC rather than by simple nucleation of the new phase, which explains thermal-history effects such as the reduced coherence length when the material is cooled back through the transition.
  • The same kind of nanoscale phase coexistence should be present in other mixed-cation perovskite oxides with a steep composition dependence of transition temperature, especially those whose end members have very different transition temperatures.
  • The average structure determined by PXRD is incomplete: a full description of the I4/mcm phase must include a minority population of M2+ tilted platelets that are invisible to X-rays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editor's inference: If the M2+ assignment holds, the diffuse rods along 001PC could be used to quantify platelet volume fraction and thickness, giving a testable prediction for neutron total-scattering experiments.
  • Editor's inference: The same platelet mechanism may explain space-group ambiguities in other 'nearly cubic' perovskite solid solutions where diffraction and local vibrational probes disagree; pair-distribution-function analysis would be a natural check.
  • Editor's inference: The reported tendency of platelets to concentrate at domain walls suggests that domain-boundary engineering could tune the population of these local tilt variants, with possible consequences for dielectric behaviour.
  • Editor's inference: Since the paper attributes the platelets to composition fluctuations combined with a steep dTC2/dx, a systematic study across the x = 0.35–0.45 composition range should show a monotonic change in platelet density; that prediction is not made by the paper itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined variable-temperature PXRD and TEM/ED study of Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3. It confirms the Pbcm structure at room temperature and below, an I4/mcm phase above 380 K, and an intermediate two-phase region when the sample is warmed from 100 K. In the I4/mcm phase, ED shows M-point reflections and diffuse streaks along [001]PC that PXRD does not detect; the authors interpret these as evidence for nanoscale platelets with in-phase M2+ tilts on {100}PC planes, and propose that these platelets explain the long-standing discrepancy between Raman spectroscopy and diffraction measurements. The paper also uses dark-field TEM of individual Δ- and M-point reflections to follow the loss of tilt coherence during the transition and discusses thermal-history effects.

Significance. If the central interpretation is correct, the paper provides a microstructural explanation for the Raman/diffraction discrepancy in (Ca,Sr)TiO3 and identifies a generic local-heterogeneity mechanism relevant to other tilted perovskites with large dTC/dx. The experimental combination is genuinely complementary: mode-decomposed Rietveld refinement against synchrotron PXRD plus dark-field imaging of individual order parameters is a powerful approach, and the observation of M-point ED intensity and streaks above the transition is an interesting and publishable result. However, the load-bearing step—the assignment of those M-point reflections to M2+ in-phase tilting—is not established with the required rigor, and the quantitative link between the streak geometry and the claimed platelet dimensions is underdeveloped. The paper's significance therefore rests on a plausible but not yet fully supported hypothesis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, §III (Fig. 5(j), S12)] The M2+ assignment is the load-bearing step of the paper, but the evidence is not sufficient. The authors base it on 'a pattern of weak intensities along 110PC consistent with systematic absences' and streaks along 001PC. No explicit reflection conditions for M2+, M5-, or M3+ are stated in the main text; no comparison with calculated structure factors or ED simulations is given; and alternatives such as residual M5- antiferrodistortive displacements, fault contrast from the dense planar defects (Figs. 3, 5), or multiple scattering in bent regions are not excluded. The authors themselves note that ED intensities are unreliable due to bending (§III, Fig. 4). Please provide a systematic-absence analysis distinguishing candidate M irreps, or ED simulations of the proposed platelet model, and explicitly rule out M5- and fault contrast.
  2. [Results, §III: 'not detected in PXRD regardless of thermal history'] The argument that the M-point reflections are absent from PXRD because of short coherence lengths is qualitative. Since the claim is that the platelets are only a few nm thick, the corresponding superstructure peaks would be extremely broad and weak; the authors do not estimate the expected PXRD intensity or the detection limit under the I11 conditions. Please provide a quantitative Scherrer/intensity estimate for a plausible platelet density and size, or at least an upper-bound calculation, to support the 'invisible to PXRD' statement.
  3. [Results, §III (Fig. 6, S12)] The proposed platelet dimensions ('few unit cells in thickness and a few nm wide') are inferred from streak geometry and DF images, but no direct real-space lattice image is shown and no quantitative correlation between the streak length and thickness is given. In addition, the DF images in Fig. 6(h) show sub-5 nm bright regions, but their relationship to the M2+ scattering is not established—they could be small domains of a different phase or contrast artifacts. A quantitative analysis of the diffuse streak (e.g., intensity profile along the rod) and, if possible, HRTEM of the platelets would substantially strengthen this conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, §III] The phrase 'pattern of weak intensities along 110PC' is ambiguous; please specify the reciprocal-lattice direction and zone axis, and explain how the systematic absences of M2+ differ from those of M5-.
  2. [Methods, Fig. 4] The ED intensity normalization in Fig. 4(c) should be described: how are the superstructure intensities summed, and how is the normalization to matrix reflections performed? This is important for the comparison with PXRD mode amplitudes.
  3. [Introduction / Fig. 1] The notation for irreps and OPDs (e.g., R5-(a,a,0)) is used without a brief tutorial; a single sentence defining the OPD convention would help readers not familiar with ISODISTORT.
  4. [Results, Fig. 3] The text describes 'the meandering black band' in Fig. 3(a) but the feature is not marked in the figure; please add an arrow or label.
  5. [Conclusions] The statement that 'the higher temperature I4/mcm phase contains nanoscale platelets' is presented as definitive, whereas the evidence for M2+ is indirect; I recommend softening the wording in the abstract/conclusions or clearly marking it as an inference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the M2+ platelet interpretation is an inference from independent TEM/ED observations, not a fitted input or self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper is an observational study combining PXRD and TEM/ED. The central claim that the high-temperature I4/mcm phase contains nanoscale M2+-tilted platelets on {100}PC planes is inferred from directly observed M-point superstructure reflections and streak geometry (Figures 5, 6, S11, S12), not derived by fitting the same data to the model. The systematic-absence analysis and streak interpretation are independent data constraints. The PXRD refinements use symmetry-adapted modes from ISODISTORT and standard group theory; these are inputs to the refinement, but the resulting order-parameter amplitudes are measurements, not predictions that reduce to those inputs. Citations to Howard/Carpenter are external predictions that the observations confirm (e.g., rods of diffuse intensity along 001PC), and self-citations (Senn & Bristowe, Beanland) are used only for standard irrep classifications and analogous defect structures; neither is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the source of the claimed result. The weakest step, distinguishing M2+ from M5- residual displacements or fault contrast, is an interpretive uncertainty, not a circularity: the assignment could be wrong, but it is not true by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no conclusion is equivalent to an input equation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

This is an experimental rather than a derivation paper. The ledger therefore lists the refined/fitted structural parameters and the modeling assumptions that the microstructural interpretation depends on. The central observation — that ED shows M-point reflections in I4/mcm that PXRD does not — is direct evidence; its specific assignment to M2+ platelets and the two-phase coexistence models are inferences.

free parameters (3)
  • Pbcm distortion-mode amplitudes (R5-, T2, Δ5, M5-)
    Refined against PXRD in TOPAS using ISODISTORT basis (Sec. II). Their temperature dependence (Fig. 4d) supports the proposed mode competition, but the values are outputs of Rietveld fitting, not independent measurements. They are load-bearing for the quantitative narrative but not for the core qualitative observation of the platelets.
  • Second I4/mcm phase parameters (Γ1+ strain / volume) = 0.2% volume difference (Fig. S8)
    Above 380 K a two-phase I4/mcm + I4/mcm model with identical structure but different volume was required; the physical reality of this phase separation is a fitted interpretation of subtle peak shapes and is near the resolution limit.
  • Intermediate Cmcm phase parameters
    Between 330–380 K, coexistence of Pbcm+Cmcm gave better fits than alternatives (Fig. S5); this is a fitted model that underpins the claim of competing tilt systems at the transition and could be a fitting artifact.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The structural distortions of the perovskite phases are fully described by symmetry-adapted modes of the Pm-3m aristotype (ISODISTORT irrep basis).
    Used throughout Sections II and III for phase identification and mode assignment. Standard in crystallography, but a modeling choice that determines which OPs are considered.
  • domain assumption Superstructure reflections and dark-field contrast in electron diffraction arise from static structural modulations in the sample, not from multiple-scattering or beam-induced artifacts.
    Underpins the M-point/M2+ assignment in I4/mcm (Figs. 5j, 6h, S12). The authors present partial checks (systematic absences, multiple zone axes) but cannot fully exclude dynamical effects, especially given the acknowledged unreliability of ED intensities.
  • domain assumption The coexistence models (Pbcm+Cmcm, I4/mcm+I4/mcm) correspond to genuinely distinct volumes of material rather than to peak-broadening artefacts.
    The phase-separation narrative (Sec. III) is supported only by Rietveld fit comparison (Fig. S5, S6–S8) on subtle reflections/peak shapes; the 0.2% volume difference is near the resolution limit.
  • domain assumption Local statistical composition fluctuations of ~x=0.4 are large enough, given dTC2/dx ~ 1400 K, to nucleate the observed nanoscale platelets.
    This is the proposed mechanism for platelet formation (Sec. III/IV); no direct local composition measurement is provided. The observation of platelets does not depend on this explanation, but the attribution to composition fluctuations does.
invented entities (1)
  • Nanoscale M2+ in-phase tilt platelets in I4/mcm
    purpose: Explain the M-point superstructure reflections in electron diffraction and the Raman/diffraction symmetry discrepancy
    The platelets are inferred from weak ED reflections and DF-TEM contrast; no independent technique outside the paper (e.g., neutron diffuse scattering) is used to confirm them, and no quantitative external prediction is made beyond the already-observed diffuse rods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resolving competing distortions in Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 using complementary electron and X-ray techniques." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OBXTQBPW

@misc{pith2026260729346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resolving competing distortions in Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 using complementary electron and X-ray techniques},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OBXTQBPW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29346}
}
abstract

We present a study of the perovskite Ca0.4Sr0.6TiO3 using variable temperature transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). At room temperature and below, PXRD shows that the material adopts an orthorhombic Pbcm structure analogous to the P-phase of NaNbO3. Above 380 K the material transforms to a tetragonal I4/mcm phase. The structural distortions of these phases can be described as a combination of modes and order parameters associated with the M, T, ${\Delta}$ and R-points of the Brillouin zone, each of which can be associated with a different set of superstructure reflections visible in X-ray and electron diffraction patterns. For the I4/mcm phase only the expected R-point reflections are observed in PXRD while both M and R- reflections are observed in electron diffraction. Using ${\Delta}$ and R dark field TEM images we show that the phase transition proceeds by a loss of coherence of TiO6 octahedral tilting along the c-axis, leading to a microstructure of thin nanoscale platelets with a different local symmetry to the macroscopic structure. These persist well above the phase transition temperature and are probably responsible for the long-standing discrepancy between Raman spectroscopy and diffraction measurements in this materials system, as well as other secondary effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29346 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG 1. (a) Phase diagram for Ca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG 2. PXRD data from Ca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG 3. TEM of room temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG 4. The AFD Δ mode and c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (h). These reflections should not exist in a material with the 𝑎 0𝑎 0 𝑐 − 𝐼4/𝑚𝑐𝑚 structure (and indeed are not detected in PXRD regardless of thermal history, indicating that they have very short coherence lengths). Electron microscopy conducted in the [112]𝑃𝐶 directio…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references

  1. [1]

    & Jakits, O

    Gränicher, H. & Jakits, O. Über die dielektrischen Eigenschaften und Phasenumwandlungen bei Mischkristallsystemen vom Perowskittyp. Nuovo Cim 11, 480–520 (1954)

    1954

  2. [2]

    Structural Behavior in the System (Ba, Ca, Sr)TiO 3 and Its Relation to Certain Dielectric Characteristics

    McQuarrie, M. Structural Behavior in the System (Ba, Ca, Sr)TiO 3 and Its Relation to Certain Dielectric Characteristics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 38, 444–449 (1955)

    1955

  3. [3]

    & Westphal, W

    Mitsui, T. & Westphal, W. B. Dielectric and X- Ray Studies of Ca xBa1-xTiO3 and CaxSr1-xTiO3. Phys. Rev. 124, 1354–1359 (1961)

    1961

  4. [4]

    Redfern, S. A. T. High -temperature structural phase transitions in perovskite (CaTiO 3). J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 8267–8275 (1996)

    1996

  5. [5]

    E., Ojovan , M

    Lee, W. E., Ojovan , M. I. & Jantzen, C. M. Radioactive Waste Management and Contaminated Site Clean -up: Processes, Technologies and International Experience . (Woodhead Publishing, 2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Reaney, I. M. et al. The role of chemical, polar and octahedral tilt disorder in high voltage/energy density ceramics. Int. Mater. Rev. 71, 178–196 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    Müller, K. A. & Burkard, H. SrTiO 3: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 K. Phys. Rev. B 19, 3593–3602 (1979)

    1979

  8. [8]

    Shin, D. et al. Quantum paraelectric phase of SrTiO3 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 104, L060103 (2021)

    2021

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    & Tachafine, A

    Palani, P., Fasquelle, D. & Tachafine, A. A review on (Sr,Ca)TiO 3-based dielectric materials: crystallography, recent progress and outlook in energy -storage aspects. Mater Sci 57, 12279–12317 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    & Pandey, D

    Ranjan, R. & Pandey, D. Antiferroelectric phase transition in (Sr 1-xCax)TiO3: II. X -ray diffraction studies. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 13, 4251–4266 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    & Lalla, N

    Ranjan, R., Pandey, D. & Lalla, N. P. Novel Features of Sr 1-xCaxTiO3 Phase Diagram: Evidence for Competing Antiferroelectric and Ferroelectric Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3726–3729 (2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    A., Howard, C

    Carpenter, M. A., Howard, C. J., Knight, K. S. & Zhang, Z. Structural relationships and a phase diagram for (Ca,Sr)TiO 3 perovskites. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, 10725 –10749 (2006)

    2006

  5. [13]

    Howard, C. J. et al. Space-group symmetry for the perovskite Ca 0.3Sr0.7TiO3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, L459–L465 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    J., Withers, R

    Howard, C. J., Withers, R. L., Knight, K. S. & Zhang, Z. (Ca 0.37Sr0.63)TiO3 perovskite—an example of an unusual class of tilted perovskites. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 135202 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    K., Ranjan, R., Pandey, D

    Mishra, S. K., Ranjan, R., Pandey, D. & Kennedy, B. J. Powder neutron diffraction study of the antiferroelectric phase transition in Sr0.75Ca0.25TiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 91, 4447–4452 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    K., Ranjan, R., Pandey, D

    Mishra, S. K., Ranjan, R., Pandey, D. & Stokes, H. T. Resolving the controversies about the ‘nearly cubic’ and other phases of Sr1-xCaxTiO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1): I. Room temperature structures. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, 1885–1898 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Ranjan, R., Pandey, D., Siruguri, V., Krishna, P. S. R. & Paranjpe, S. K. Novel structural features and phase transition behaviour of (Sr 1- xCax)TiO3 : I. Neutron diffraction study. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 2233–2246 (1999)

    1999

  10. [18]

    Mishra, S. K. et al. A combined X -ray diffraction and Raman scattering study of the phase transitions in Sr 1−xCaxTiO3 (x = 0.04, 0.06, and 0.12). J. Solid State Chem. 178, 2846– 2857 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Ranson, P. et al. The various phases of the system Sr 1-xCaxTiO3 - A Raman scattering study. J. Raman Spectrosc. 36, 898–911 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    Manchado, J. et al. Dielectric, calorimetric and elastic anomalies associated with the first order I4/mcm → Pbcm phase transition in (Ca, Sr)TiO3 perovskites. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 295903 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Glazer, A. M. The classification of tilted octahedra in perovskites. Acta Cryst. B 28, 3384–3392 (1972)

    1972

  14. [22]

    Howard, C. J. & Stokes, H. T. Group - Theoretical Analysis of Octahedral Tilting in Perovskites. Acta Cryst. B 54, 782–789 (1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    Senn, M. S. & Bristowe, N. C. A group - theoretical approach to enumerating magnetoelectric and multiferroic couplings in perovskites. Acta Cryst. A 74, 308–321 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Megaw, H. D. The seven phases of sodium niobate. Ferroelectrics 7, 87–89 (1974)

    1974

  17. [25]

    Shuvaeva, V. A. et al. Crystal structure of the electric-field induced ferroelectric phase of NaNbO3. Ferroelectrics 141, 307–311 (1993)

    1993

  18. [26]

    J., Evans, J

    Campbell, B. J., Evans, J. S., Perselli, F. & Stokes, H. T. Rietveld refinement of structural distortion-mode amplitudes. IUCr Comput. Comm. Newsl. 81–95 (2007). *R.S. and C.A.C. contributed equally to this work †Contact author: R.Beanland@warwick.ac.uk ‡Contact author: M.Senn...

    2007

  19. [27]

    Coelho, A. A. TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: an optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 210–218 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    T., Hatch, D

    Stokes, H. T., Hatch, D. M. & Campbell, B. J. ISODISTORT, ISOTROPY Software Suite, iso.byu.edu. iso.byu.edu

  21. [29]

    J., Stokes, H

    Campbell, B. J., Stokes, H. T., Tanner, D. E. & Hatch, D. M. ISODISPLACE : a web-based tool for exploring structural distortions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 607–614 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    & Lalla, N

    Anwar, S. & Lalla, N. P. Electron microscopic studies of the antiferroelectric phase in Sr0.60Ca0.40TiO3 ceramic. J. Solid State Chem. 181, 997–1004 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    & Lalla, N

    Anwar, S. & Lalla, N. P. Occurrence of a new superlattice phase across the antiferroelectric phase transition in Sr 1-xCaxTiO3 (x = 0.30 and 0.40). J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 20, 325231 (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    & Lalla, N

    Anwar, S. & Lalla, N. P. Phase coexistence in Sr0.70Ca0.30TiO3 studied through electron diffraction. Solid State Sci. 10, 307–315 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    & Lalla, N

    Anwar, S. & Lalla, N. P. Space group analysis of Sr 1-xCaxTiO3 ceramics with x = 0.20, 0.27 and 0.30 through electron diffraction. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 19, 436210 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Structure of planar defects in tilted perovskites

    Beanland, R. Structure of planar defects in tilted perovskites. Acta Cryst. A 67, 191 –199 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Salje, E. K. H. Multiferroic Domain Boundaries as Active Memory Devices: Trajectories Towards Domain Boundary Engineering. ChemPhysChem 11, 940–950 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    & Thomas, P

    Beanland, R. & Thomas, P. A. Imaging planar tetragonal sheets in rhombohedral Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 using transmission electron microscopy. Scr. Mater. 65, 440–443 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    See Supplemental Material for descriptions of distortion modes, Rietveld refinements and extracted structural information, and additional electron diffraction and microscopy

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.